narrative approach case study

Narrative Analysis 101

Everything you need to know to get started

By: Ethar Al-Saraf (PhD)| Expert Reviewed By: Eunice Rautenbach (DTech) | March 2023

If you’re new to research, the host of qualitative analysis methods available to you can be a little overwhelming. In this post, we’ll  unpack the sometimes slippery topic of narrative analysis . We’ll explain what it is, consider its strengths and weaknesses , and look at when and when not to use this analysis method. 

Overview: Narrative Analysis

• What is narrative analysis (simple definition)
• The two overarching approaches  
• The strengths & weaknesses of narrative analysis
• When (and when not) to use it
• Key takeaways

What Is Narrative Analysis?

Simply put, narrative analysis is a qualitative analysis method focused on interpreting human experiences and motivations by looking closely at the stories (the narratives) people tell in a particular context.

In other words, a narrative analysis interprets long-form participant responses or written stories as data, to uncover themes and meanings . That data could be taken from interviews , monologues, written stories, or even recordings. In other words, narrative analysis can be used on both primary and secondary data to provide evidence from the experiences described.

That’s all quite conceptual, so let’s look at an example of how narrative analysis could be used.

Let’s say you’re interested in researching the beliefs of a particular author on popular culture. In that case, you might identify the characters , plotlines , symbols and motifs used in their stories. You could then use narrative analysis to analyse these in combination and against the backdrop of the relevant context.

This would allow you to interpret the underlying meanings and implications in their writing, and what they reveal about the beliefs of the author. In other words, you’d look to understand the views of the author by analysing the narratives that run through their work.

The Two Overarching Approaches

Generally speaking, there are two approaches that one can take to narrative analysis. Specifically, an inductive approach or a deductive approach. Each one will have a meaningful impact on how you interpret your data and the conclusions you can draw, so it’s important that you understand the difference.

First up is the inductive approach to narrative analysis.

The inductive approach takes a bottom-up view , allowing the data to speak for itself, without the influence of any preconceived notions . With this approach, you begin by looking at the data and deriving patterns and themes that can be used to explain the story, as opposed to viewing the data through the lens of pre-existing hypotheses, theories or frameworks. In other words, the analysis is led by the data.

For example, with an inductive approach, you might notice patterns or themes in the way an author presents their characters or develops their plot. You’d then observe these patterns, develop an interpretation of what they might reveal in the context of the story, and draw conclusions relative to the aims of your research.

Contrasted to this is the deductive approach.

With the deductive approach to narrative analysis, you begin by using existing theories that a narrative can be tested against . Here, the analysis adopts particular theoretical assumptions and/or provides hypotheses, and then looks for evidence in a story that will either verify or disprove them.

For example, your analysis might begin with a theory that wealthy authors only tell stories to get the sympathy of their readers. A deductive analysis might then look at the narratives of wealthy authors for evidence that will substantiate (or refute) the theory and then draw conclusions about its accuracy, and suggest explanations for why that might or might not be the case.

Which approach you should take depends on your research aims, objectives and research questions . If these are more exploratory in nature, you’ll likely take an inductive approach. Conversely, if they are more confirmatory in nature, you’ll likely opt for the deductive approach.

Need a helping hand?

Strengths & Weaknesses

Now that we have a clearer view of what narrative analysis is and the two approaches to it, it’s important to understand its strengths and weaknesses , so that you can make the right choices in your research project.

A primary strength of narrative analysis is the rich insight it can generate by uncovering the underlying meanings and interpretations of human experience. The focus on an individual narrative highlights the nuances and complexities of their experience, revealing details that might be missed or considered insignificant by other methods.

Another strength of narrative analysis is the range of topics it can be used for. The focus on human experience means that a narrative analysis can democratise your data analysis, by revealing the value of individuals’ own interpretation of their experience in contrast to broader social, cultural, and political factors.

All that said, just like all analysis methods, narrative analysis has its weaknesses. It’s important to understand these so that you can choose the most appropriate method for your particular research project.

The first drawback of narrative analysis is the problem of subjectivity and interpretation . In other words, a drawback of the focus on stories and their details is that they’re open to being understood differently depending on who’s reading them. This means that a strong understanding of the author’s cultural context is crucial to developing your interpretation of the data. At the same time, it’s important that you remain open-minded in how you interpret your chosen narrative and avoid making any assumptions .

A second weakness of narrative analysis is the issue of reliability and generalisation . Since narrative analysis depends almost entirely on a subjective narrative and your interpretation, the findings and conclusions can’t usually be generalised or empirically verified. Although some conclusions can be drawn about the cultural context, they’re still based on what will almost always be anecdotal data and not suitable for the basis of a theory, for example.

Last but not least, the focus on long-form data expressed as stories means that narrative analysis can be very time-consuming . In addition to the source data itself, you will have to be well informed on the author’s cultural context as well as other interpretations of the narrative, where possible, to ensure you have a holistic view. So, if you’re going to undertake narrative analysis, make sure that you allocate a generous amount of time to work through the data.

When To Use Narrative Analysis

As a qualitative method focused on analysing and interpreting narratives describing human experiences, narrative analysis is usually most appropriate for research topics focused on social, personal, cultural , or even ideological events or phenomena and how they’re understood at an individual level.

For example, if you were interested in understanding the experiences and beliefs of individuals suffering social marginalisation, you could use narrative analysis to look at the narratives and stories told by people in marginalised groups to identify patterns , symbols , or motifs that shed light on how they rationalise their experiences.

In this example, narrative analysis presents a good natural fit as it’s focused on analysing people’s stories to understand their views and beliefs at an individual level. Conversely, if your research was geared towards understanding broader themes and patterns regarding an event or phenomena, analysis methods such as content analysis or thematic analysis may be better suited, depending on your research aim .

Let’s recap

In this post, we’ve explored the basics of narrative analysis in qualitative research. The key takeaways are:

• Narrative analysis is a qualitative analysis method focused on interpreting human experience in the form of stories or narratives .
• There are two overarching approaches to narrative analysis: the inductive (exploratory) approach and the deductive (confirmatory) approach.
• Like all analysis methods, narrative analysis has a particular set of strengths and weaknesses .
• Narrative analysis is generally most appropriate for research focused on interpreting individual, human experiences as expressed in detailed , long-form accounts.

If you’d like to learn more about narrative analysis and qualitative analysis methods in general, be sure to check out the rest of the Grad Coach blog here . Alternatively, if you’re looking for hands-on help with your project, take a look at our 1-on-1 private coaching service .

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

Thanks. I need examples of narrative analysis

Here are some examples of research topics that could utilise narrative analysis:

Personal Narratives of Trauma: Analysing personal stories of individuals who have experienced trauma to understand the impact, coping mechanisms, and healing processes.

Identity Formation in Immigrant Communities: Examining the narratives of immigrants to explore how they construct and negotiate their identities in a new cultural context.

Media Representations of Gender: Analysing narratives in media texts (such as films, television shows, or advertisements) to investigate the portrayal of gender roles, stereotypes, and power dynamics.

Where can I find an example of a narrative analysis table ?

Please i need help with my project,

how can I cite this article in APA 7th style?

please mention the sources as well.

My research is mixed approach. I use interview,key_inforamt interview,FGD and document.so,which qualitative analysis is appropriate to analyze these data.Thanks

Which qualitative analysis methode is appropriate to analyze data obtain from intetview,key informant intetview,Focus group discussion and document.

I’ve finished my PhD. Now I need a “platform” that will help me objectively ascertain the tacit assumptions that are buried within a narrative. Can you help?

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Using narrative analysis in qualitative research

Last updated

7 March 2023

Reviewed by

Jean Kaluza

Short on time? Get an AI generated summary of this article instead

After spending considerable time and effort interviewing persons for research, you want to ensure you get the most out of the data you gathered. One method that gives you an excellent opportunity to connect with your data on a very human and personal level is a narrative analysis in qualitative research. 

Master narrative analysis

Analyze your qualitative data faster and surface more actionable insights

• What is narrative analysis?

Narrative analysis is a type of qualitative data analysis that focuses on interpreting the core narratives from a study group's personal stories. Using first-person narrative, data is acquired and organized to allow the researcher to understand how the individuals experienced something. 

Instead of focusing on just the actual words used during an interview, the narrative analysis also allows for a compilation of data on how the person expressed themselves, what language they used when describing a particular event or feeling, and the thoughts and motivations they experienced. A narrative analysis will also consider how the research participants constructed their narratives.

From the interview to coding , you should strive to keep the entire individual narrative together, so that the information shared during the interview remains intact.

Is narrative analysis qualitative or quantitative?

Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method.

Is narrative analysis a method or methodology?

A method describes the tools or processes used to understand your data; methodology describes the overall framework used to support the methods chosen. By this definition, narrative analysis can be both a method used to understand data and a methodology appropriate for approaching data that comes primarily from first-person stories.

• Do you need to perform narrative research to conduct a narrative analysis?

A narrative analysis will give the best answers about the data if you begin with conducting narrative research. Narrative research explores an entire story with a research participant to understand their personal story.

What are the characteristics of narrative research?

Narrative research always includes data from individuals that tell the story of their experiences. This is captured using loosely structured interviews . These can be a single interview or a series of long interviews over a period of time. Narrative research focuses on the construct and expressions of the story as experienced by the research participant.

• Examples of types of narratives

Narrative data is based on narratives. Your data may include the entire life story or a complete personal narrative, giving a comprehensive account of someone's life, depending on the researched subject. Alternatively, a topical story can provide context around one specific moment in the research participant's life. 

Personal narratives can be single or multiple sessions, encompassing more than topical stories but not entire life stories of the individuals.

• What is the objective of narrative analysis?

The narrative analysis seeks to organize the overall experience of a group of research participants' stories. The goal is to turn people's individual narratives into data that can be coded and organized so that researchers can easily understand the impact of a certain event, feeling, or decision on the involved persons. At the end of a narrative analysis, researchers can identify certain core narratives that capture the human experience.

What is the difference between content analysis and narrative analysis?

Content analysis is a research method that determines how often certain words, concepts, or themes appear inside a sampling of qualitative data . The narrative analysis focuses on the overall story and organizing the constructs and features of a narrative.

Free AI content analysis generator

Make sense of your research by automatically summarizing key takeaways through our free content analysis tool.

What is the difference between narrative analysis and case study in qualitative research?

A case study focuses on one particular event. A narrative analysis draws from a larger amount of data surrounding the entire narrative, including the thoughts that led up to a decision and the personal conclusion of the research participant. 

A case study, therefore, is any specific topic studied in depth, whereas narrative analysis explores single or multi-faceted experiences across time. ​​

What is the difference between narrative analysis and thematic analysis?

A thematic analysis will appear as researchers review the available qualitative data and note any recurring themes. Unlike narrative analysis, which describes an entire method of evaluating data to find a conclusion, a thematic analysis only describes reviewing and categorizing the data.

• Capturing narrative data

Because narrative data relies heavily on allowing a research participant to describe their experience, it is best to allow for a less structured interview. Allowing the participant to explore tangents or analyze their personal narrative will result in more complete data. 

When collecting narrative data, always allow the participant the time and space needed to complete their narrative.

• Methods of transcribing narrative data

A narrative analysis requires that the researchers have access to the entire verbatim narrative of the participant, including not just the word they use but the pauses, the verbal tics, and verbal crutches, such as "um" and "hmm." 

As the entire way the story is expressed is part of the data, a verbatim transcription should be created before attempting to code the narrative analysis.

Video and audio transcription templates

• How to code narrative analysis

Coding narrative analysis has two natural start points, either using a deductive coding system or an inductive coding system. Regardless of your chosen method, it's crucial not to lose valuable data during the organization process.

When coding, expect to see more information in the code snippets.

• Types of narrative analysis

After coding is complete, you should expect your data to look like large blocks of text organized by the parts of the story. You will also see where individual narratives compare and diverge.

Inductive method

Using an inductive narrative method treats the entire narrative as one datum or one set of information. An inductive narrative method will encourage the research participant to organize their own story. 

To make sense of how a story begins and ends, you must rely on cues from the participant. These may take the form of entrance and exit talks. 

Participants may not always provide clear indicators of where their narratives start and end. However, you can anticipate that their stories will contain elements of a beginning, middle, and end. By analyzing these components through coding, you can identify emerging patterns in the data.

Taking cues from entrance and exit talk

Entrance talk is when the participant begins a particular set of narratives. You may hear expressions such as, "I remember when…," "It first occurred to me when…," or "Here's an example…."

Exit talk allows you to see when the story is wrapping up, and you might expect to hear a phrase like, "…and that's how we decided", "after that, we moved on," or "that's pretty much it."

Deductive method

Regardless of your chosen method, using a deductive method can help preserve the overall storyline while coding. Starting with a deductive method allows for the separation of narrative pieces without compromising the story's integrity.

Hybrid inductive and deductive narrative analysis

Using both methods together gives you a comprehensive understanding of the data. You can start by coding the entire story using the inductive method. Then, you can better analyze and interpret the data by applying deductive codes to individual parts of the story.

• How to analyze data after coding using narrative analysis

A narrative analysis aims to take all relevant interviews and organize them down to a few core narratives. After reviewing the coding, these core narratives may appear through a repeated moment of decision occurring before the climax or a key feeling that affected the participant's outcome.

You may see these core narratives diverge early on, or you may learn that a particular moment after introspection reveals the core narrative for each participant. Either way, researchers can now quickly express and understand the data you acquired.

• A step-by-step approach to narrative analysis and finding core narratives

Narrative analysis may look slightly different to each research group, but we will walk through the process using the Delve method for this article.

Step 1 – Code narrative blocks

Organize your narrative blocks using inductive coding to organize stories by a life event.

Example: Narrative interviews are conducted with homeowners asking them to describe how they bought their first home.

Step 2 – Group and read by live-event

You begin your data analysis by reading through each of the narratives coded with the same life event.

Example: You read through each homeowner's experience of buying their first home and notice that some common themes begin to appear, such as "we were tired of renting," "our family expanded to the point that we needed a larger space," and "we had finally saved enough for a downpayment."

Step 3 – Create a nested story structure

As these common narratives develop throughout the participant's interviews, create and nest code according to your narrative analysis framework. Use your coding to break down the narrative into pieces that can be analyzed together.

Example: During your interviews, you find that the beginning of the narrative usually includes the pressures faced before buying a home that pushes the research participants to consider homeownership. The middle of the narrative often includes challenges that come up during the decision-making process. The end of the narrative usually includes perspectives about the excitement, stress, or consequences of home ownership that has finally taken place. 

Step 4 – Delve into the story structure

Once the narratives are organized into their pieces, you begin to notice how participants structure their own stories and where similarities and differences emerge.

Example: You find in your research that many people who choose to buy homes had the desire to buy a home before their circumstances allowed them to. You notice that almost all the stories begin with the feeling of some sort of outside pressure.

Step 5 – Compare across story structure

While breaking down narratives into smaller pieces is necessary for analysis, it's important not to lose sight of the overall story. To keep the big picture in mind, take breaks to step back and reread the entire narrative of a code block. This will help you remember how participants expressed themselves and ensure that the core narrative remains the focus of the analysis.

Example: By carefully examining the similarities across the beginnings of participants' narratives, you find the similarities in pressures. Considering the overall narrative, you notice how these pressures lead to similar decisions despite the challenges faced. 

Divergence in feelings towards homeownership can be linked to positive or negative pressures. Individuals who received positive pressure, such as family support or excitement, may view homeownership more favorably. Meanwhile, negative pressures like high rent or peer pressure may cause individuals to have a more negative attitude toward homeownership.

These factors can contribute to the initial divergence in feelings towards homeownership.

Step 6 – Tell the core narrative

After carefully analyzing the data, you have found how the narratives relate and diverge. You may be able to create a theory about why the narratives diverge and can create one or two core narratives that explain the way the story was experienced.

Example: You can now construct a core narrative on how a person's initial feelings toward buying a house affect their feelings after purchasing and living in their first home.

Narrative analysis in qualitative research is an invaluable tool to understand how people's stories and ability to self-narrate reflect the human experience. Qualitative data analysis can be improved through coding and organizing complete narratives. By doing so, researchers can conclude how humans process and move through decisions and life events.

Learn more about qualitative transcription software

Should you be using a customer insights hub.

Do you want to discover previous research faster?

Do you share your research findings with others?

Do you analyze research data?

Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster

Editor’s picks

Last updated: 18 April 2023

Last updated: 27 February 2023

Last updated: 22 August 2024

Last updated: 5 February 2023

Last updated: 16 August 2024

Last updated: 9 March 2023

Last updated: 30 April 2024

Last updated: 12 December 2023

Last updated: 11 March 2024

Last updated: 4 July 2024

Last updated: 6 March 2024

Last updated: 5 March 2024

Last updated: 13 May 2024

Latest articles

Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next, log in or sign up.

Get started for free

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Narrative approaches to case studies

Related Papers

International Journal of Qualitative Methods

Elelwani Ramugondo

Case study and narrative inquiry as merged methodological frameworks can make a vital contribution that seeks to understand processes that may explain current realities within professions and broader society. This article offers an explanation of how a critical perspective on case study and narrative inquiry as an embedded methodology unearthed the interplay between structure and agency within storied lives. This case narrative emerged out of a doctoral thesis in occupational therapy, a single instrumental case describing a process of professional role transition within school-level specialized education in the Western Cape, South Africa. This case served as an exemplar in demonstrating how case study recognized the multiple layers to the context within which the process of professional role transition unfolded. The embedded narrative inquiry served to clarify emerging professional identities for occupational therapists within school-level specialized education in postapartheid Sout...

Maria Tamboukou

"Examining narrative methods in the context of its multi-disciplinary social science origins, this text looks at its theoretical underpinnings, while retaining an emphasis on the process of doing narrative research. The authors provide a comprehensive guide to narrative methods, taking the reader from initial decisions about forms of narrative analysis, through more complex issues of reflexivity, interpretation and the research context. The contributions included here clearly demonstrate the value of narrative methods for contemporary social research and practice. This book will be invaluable for all social science postgraduate students and researchers looking to use narrative methods in their own research."

Doing Narrative Research edition 1

Corinne Squire

Hervé Corvellec

This article is intended to be an introduction to narrative analysis. It introduces key terms in narrative theory (eg story and plot), discusses various types of narratives relevant for social studies and features three selected analytical approaches to narratives: a poetic classification, a tripartite way of reading and a deconstructive analysis. The conclusion presents some reflections on narratives as ways to make sense of time.

Hubert Van Puyenbroeck

John Schostak

Anecdotes are central to understanding and writing about people's lives. They provide an essential stepping stone to case studies and are fundamental to qualitative research methodologies. It draws upon Laclau's poststructuralist approach to discourse in exploring the development of narrative based case studies and in doing so presents an approach to 'triangulation' as a basis for validity and the reduction of bias.

NB This paper is a draft. Please reference the chapter as published: Esin, C., Fathi, M., & Squire, C. (2014). Narrative analysis: The constructionist approach. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. (pp. 203-217). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n14 Narrative analysis is an analytical method that accommodates a variety of approaches. Through these approaches, social researchers explore how people story their lives. This is also a process through which researchers understand the complexities of personal and social relations. Narrative analysis provides the researcher with useful tools to comprehend the diversity and the different levels involved in stories, rather than treating those stories simply as coherent, natural and unified entities (Andrews et al., 2004). It is this approach to narrative analysis, which we shall call the constructionist approach to narrative analysis, that we aim to explain in the chapter that follows.

Maura Striano

shelley day sclater , Corinne Squire

David M Boje

Narrative analysis is the sequencing of events and character identities derived by retrospective sensory representation. Narrative representations includes first a chronology and second a whole structure of constituent elements that relate together in poetic form, in order to examine how past shapes present, present perspectives filter the past. Narrative analysis represents how the author and others value events, characters, and elements differently. Narrative analysis can be applied to cases used for pedagogy and theory building in the social sciences. Case narratives are sensory representations derived from oral, document, or observational sources (including dramaturgical gestures, décor, or architecture).

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Therese Thuv

Leen Beyers

Narrative Inquiry

Anna De Fina

Anna Borisenkova

Doing narrative research

Journal of Writing in Creative Practice

Yasmin Gunaratnam

Italian Journal of Sociology of Education

Paolo Diana

Text & Talk-An …

HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory

Shaun Gallagher

Doing Narrative Research

Molly Andrews

Agricultural History

Erika Friedl

Deborah Tolman , Chunyan Yu

Laura Gillman

Movimento Revista de Educação Física da UFRGS

Arthur Bochner

Teresa Stone , Margaret McMillan

Narrative inquiry

Alexandra Georgakopoulou

Sharon Todd

Amardo Rodriguez

Corinne Squire , Lars Christer Hyden , Margareta Hyden

Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa (Auto)Biográfica

Jean Clandinin

The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods

Matti Hyvärinen

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Narrative Research

• In book: https://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6 (pp.1-13)
• Edition: eds
• Publisher: Springer

• University of Eswatini

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations
• Suanne Mistel Segovia-Tzompa
• Immaculata Casimero
• Marisol García Apagüeño

• Elizabeth Emily Watson

• Bambang Pratama

• Gloria Hongyee Chan

• Mohammad Hassan Naderi
• Josie Leonard

• Sun Kyung Kim
• Myonghwa Park
• Fereshteh Heidari
• Zinat Amiri

• W. Bryce Hagedorn

• David Herman

• F. Michael Connelly
• Denise Lillian Appel
• Maria Papaikonomou
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Qualitative study design: Narrative inquiry

• Qualitative study design
• Phenomenology
• Grounded theory
• Ethnography

Narrative inquiry

• Action research
• Case Studies
• Field research
• Focus groups
• Observation
• Surveys & questionnaires
• Study Designs Home

Narrative inquiry can reveal unique perspectives and deeper understanding of a situation. Often giving voice to marginalised populations whose perspective is not often sought. 

Narrative inquiry records the experiences of an individual or small group, revealing the lived experience or particular perspective of that individual, usually primarily through interview which is then recorded and ordered into a chronological narrative. Often recorded as biography, life history or in the case of older/ancient traditional story recording - oral history.  

• Qualitative survey 
• Recordings of oral history (documents can be used as support for correlation and triangulation of information mentioned in interview.) 
• Focus groups can be used where the focus is a small group or community. 

Reveals in-depth detail of a situation or life experience.  

Can reveal historically significant issues not elsewhere recorded. 

Narrative research was considered a way to democratise the documentation and lived experience of a wider gamut of society. In the past only the rich could afford a biographer to have their life experience recorded, narrative research gave voice to marginalised people and their lived experience. 

Limitations

“The Hawthorne Effect is the tendency, particularly in social experiments, for people to modify their behaviour because they know they are being studied, and so to distort (usually unwittingly) the research findings.” SRMO  

The researcher must be heavily embedded in the topic with a broad understanding of the subject’s life experience in order to effectively and realistically represent the subject’s life experience. 

There is a lot of data to be worked through making this a time-consuming method beyond even the interview process itself. 

Subject’s will focus on their lived experience and not comment on the greater social movements at work at the time. For example, how the Global Financial Crisis affected their lives, not what caused the Global Financial Crisis. 

This research method relies heavily on the memory of the subject. Therefore, triangulation of the information is recommended such as asking the question in a different way, at a later date, looking for correlating documentation or interviewing similarly related participants. 

Example questions

• What is the lived experience of a home carer for a terminal cancer patient? 
• What is it like for parents to have their children die young? 
• What was the role of the nurse in Australian hospitals in the 1960s? 
• What is it like to live with cerebral palsy? 
• What are the difficulties of living in a wheelchair? 

Example studies

• Francis, M. (2018). A Narrative Inquiry Into the Experience of Being a Victim of Gun Violence. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 25(6), 381–388. https://doi-org.ezproxy-f.deakin.edu.au/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000406 
•  Kean, B., Oprescu, F., Gray, M., & Burkett, B. (2018). Commitment to physical activity and health: A case study of a paralympic gold medallist. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40(17), 2093-2097. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1323234  https://doi-org.ezproxy-f.deakin.edu.au/10.1080/09638288.2017.1323234
• Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative research methods. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.deakin.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00097a&AN=deakin.b2351301&site=eds-live   
• Padgett, D. (2012). Qualitative and mixed methods in public health. SAGE. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.deakin.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00097a&AN=deakin.b3657335&authtype=sso&custid=deakin&site=eds-live&scope=site    
• << Previous: Historical
• Next: Action research >>
• Last Updated: Jul 3, 2024 11:46 AM
• URL: https://deakin.libguides.com/qualitative-study-designs

• Privacy Policy

Home » Narrative Analysis – Types, Methods and Examples

Narrative Analysis – Types, Methods and Examples

Table of Contents

Narrative Analysis

Definition:

Narrative analysis is a qualitative research methodology that involves examining and interpreting the stories or narratives people tell in order to gain insights into the meanings, experiences, and perspectives that underlie them. Narrative analysis can be applied to various forms of communication, including written texts, oral interviews, and visual media.

In narrative analysis, researchers typically examine the structure, content, and context of the narratives they are studying, paying close attention to the language, themes, and symbols used by the storytellers. They may also look for patterns or recurring motifs within the narratives, and consider the cultural and social contexts in which they are situated.

Types of Narrative Analysis

Types of Narrative Analysis are as follows:

Content Analysis

This type of narrative analysis involves examining the content of a narrative in order to identify themes, motifs, and other patterns. Researchers may use coding schemes to identify specific themes or categories within the text, and then analyze how they are related to each other and to the overall narrative. Content analysis can be used to study various forms of communication, including written texts, oral interviews, and visual media.

Structural Analysis

This type of narrative analysis focuses on the formal structure of a narrative, including its plot, character development, and use of literary devices. Researchers may analyze the narrative arc, the relationship between the protagonist and antagonist, or the use of symbolism and metaphor. Structural analysis can be useful for understanding how a narrative is constructed and how it affects the reader or audience.

Discourse Analysis

This type of narrative analysis focuses on the language and discourse used in a narrative, including the social and cultural context in which it is situated. Researchers may analyze the use of specific words or phrases, the tone and style of the narrative, or the ways in which social and cultural norms are reflected in the narrative. Discourse analysis can be useful for understanding how narratives are influenced by larger social and cultural structures.

Phenomenological Analysis

This type of narrative analysis focuses on the subjective experience of the narrator, and how they interpret and make sense of their experiences. Researchers may analyze the language used to describe experiences, the emotions expressed in the narrative, or the ways in which the narrator constructs meaning from their experiences. Phenomenological analysis can be useful for understanding how people make sense of their own lives and experiences.

Critical Analysis

This type of narrative analysis involves examining the political, social, and ideological implications of a narrative, and questioning its underlying assumptions and values. Researchers may analyze the ways in which a narrative reflects or reinforces dominant power structures, or how it challenges or subverts those structures. Critical analysis can be useful for understanding the role that narratives play in shaping social and cultural norms.

Autoethnography

This type of narrative analysis involves using personal narratives to explore cultural experiences and identity formation. Researchers may use their own personal narratives to explore issues such as race, gender, or sexuality, and to understand how larger social and cultural structures shape individual experiences. Autoethnography can be useful for understanding how individuals negotiate and navigate complex cultural identities.

Thematic Analysis

This method involves identifying themes or patterns that emerge from the data, and then interpreting these themes in relation to the research question. Researchers may use a deductive approach, where they start with a pre-existing theoretical framework, or an inductive approach, where themes are generated from the data itself.

Narrative Analysis Conducting Guide

Here are some steps for conducting narrative analysis:

• Identify the research question: Narrative analysis begins with identifying the research question or topic of interest. Researchers may want to explore a particular social or cultural phenomenon, or gain a deeper understanding of a particular individual’s experience.
• Collect the narratives: Researchers then collect the narratives or stories that they will analyze. This can involve collecting written texts, conducting interviews, or analyzing visual media.
• Transcribe and code the narratives: Once the narratives have been collected, they are transcribed into a written format, and then coded in order to identify themes, motifs, or other patterns. Researchers may use a coding scheme that has been developed specifically for the study, or they may use an existing coding scheme.
• Analyze the narratives: Researchers then analyze the narratives, focusing on the themes, motifs, and other patterns that have emerged from the coding process. They may also analyze the formal structure of the narratives, the language used, and the social and cultural context in which they are situated.
• Interpret the findings: Finally, researchers interpret the findings of the narrative analysis, and draw conclusions about the meanings, experiences, and perspectives that underlie the narratives. They may use the findings to develop theories, make recommendations, or inform further research.

Applications of Narrative Analysis

Narrative analysis is a versatile qualitative research method that has applications across a wide range of fields, including psychology, sociology, anthropology, literature, and history. Here are some examples of how narrative analysis can be used:

• Understanding individuals’ experiences: Narrative analysis can be used to gain a deeper understanding of individuals’ experiences, including their thoughts, feelings, and perspectives. For example, psychologists might use narrative analysis to explore the stories that individuals tell about their experiences with mental illness.
• Exploring cultural and social phenomena: Narrative analysis can also be used to explore cultural and social phenomena, such as gender, race, and identity. Sociologists might use narrative analysis to examine how individuals understand and experience their gender identity.
• Analyzing historical events: Narrative analysis can be used to analyze historical events, including those that have been recorded in literary texts or personal accounts. Historians might use narrative analysis to explore the stories of survivors of historical traumas, such as war or genocide.
• Examining media representations: Narrative analysis can be used to examine media representations of social and cultural phenomena, such as news stories, films, or television shows. Communication scholars might use narrative analysis to examine how news media represent different social groups.
• Developing interventions: Narrative analysis can be used to develop interventions to address social and cultural problems. For example, social workers might use narrative analysis to understand the experiences of individuals who have experienced domestic violence, and then use that knowledge to develop more effective interventions.

Examples of Narrative Analysis

Here are some examples of how narrative analysis has been used in research:

• Personal narratives of illness: Researchers have used narrative analysis to examine the personal narratives of individuals living with chronic illness, to understand how they make sense of their experiences and construct their identities.
• Oral histories: Historians have used narrative analysis to analyze oral histories to gain insights into individuals’ experiences of historical events and social movements.
• Children’s stories: Researchers have used narrative analysis to analyze children’s stories to understand how they understand and make sense of the world around them.
• Personal diaries : Researchers have used narrative analysis to examine personal diaries to gain insights into individuals’ experiences of significant life events, such as the loss of a loved one or the transition to adulthood.
• Memoirs : Researchers have used narrative analysis to analyze memoirs to understand how individuals construct their life stories and make sense of their experiences.
• Life histories : Researchers have used narrative analysis to examine life histories to gain insights into individuals’ experiences of migration, displacement, or social exclusion.

Purpose of Narrative Analysis

The purpose of narrative analysis is to gain a deeper understanding of the stories that individuals tell about their experiences, identities, and beliefs. By analyzing the structure, content, and context of these stories, researchers can uncover patterns and themes that shed light on the ways in which individuals make sense of their lives and the world around them.

The primary purpose of narrative analysis is to explore the meanings that individuals attach to their experiences. This involves examining the different elements of a story, such as the plot, characters, setting, and themes, to identify the underlying values, beliefs, and attitudes that shape the story. By analyzing these elements, researchers can gain insights into the ways in which individuals construct their identities, understand their relationships with others, and make sense of the world.

Narrative analysis can also be used to identify patterns and themes across multiple stories. This involves comparing and contrasting the stories of different individuals or groups to identify commonalities and differences. By analyzing these patterns and themes, researchers can gain insights into broader cultural and social phenomena, such as gender, race, and identity.

In addition, narrative analysis can be used to develop interventions that address social and cultural problems. By understanding the stories that individuals tell about their experiences, researchers can develop interventions that are tailored to the unique needs of different individuals and groups.

Overall, the purpose of narrative analysis is to provide a rich, nuanced understanding of the ways in which individuals construct meaning and make sense of their lives. By analyzing the stories that individuals tell, researchers can gain insights into the complex and multifaceted nature of human experience.

When to use Narrative Analysis

Here are some situations where narrative analysis may be appropriate:

• Studying life stories: Narrative analysis can be useful in understanding how individuals construct their life stories, including the events, characters, and themes that are important to them.
• Analyzing cultural narratives: Narrative analysis can be used to analyze cultural narratives, such as myths, legends, and folktales, to understand their meanings and functions.
• Exploring organizational narratives: Narrative analysis can be helpful in examining the stories that organizations tell about themselves, their histories, and their values, to understand how they shape the culture and practices of the organization.
• Investigating media narratives: Narrative analysis can be used to analyze media narratives, such as news stories, films, and TV shows, to understand how they construct meaning and influence public perceptions.
• Examining policy narratives: Narrative analysis can be helpful in examining policy narratives, such as political speeches and policy documents, to understand how they construct ideas and justify policy decisions.

Characteristics of Narrative Analysis

Here are some key characteristics of narrative analysis:

• Focus on stories and narratives: Narrative analysis is concerned with analyzing the stories and narratives that people tell, whether they are oral or written, to understand how they shape and reflect individuals’ experiences and identities.
• Emphasis on context: Narrative analysis seeks to understand the context in which the narratives are produced and the social and cultural factors that shape them.
• Interpretive approach: Narrative analysis is an interpretive approach that seeks to identify patterns and themes in the stories and narratives and to understand the meaning that individuals and communities attach to them.
• Iterative process: Narrative analysis involves an iterative process of analysis, in which the researcher continually refines their understanding of the narratives as they examine more data.
• Attention to language and form : Narrative analysis pays close attention to the language and form of the narratives, including the use of metaphor, imagery, and narrative structure, to understand the meaning that individuals and communities attach to them.
• Reflexivity : Narrative analysis requires the researcher to reflect on their own assumptions and biases and to consider how their own positionality may shape their interpretation of the narratives.
• Qualitative approach: Narrative analysis is typically a qualitative research method that involves in-depth analysis of a small number of cases rather than large-scale quantitative studies.

Advantages of Narrative Analysis

Here are some advantages of narrative analysis:

• Rich and detailed data : Narrative analysis provides rich and detailed data that allows for a deep understanding of individuals’ experiences, emotions, and identities.
• Humanizing approach: Narrative analysis allows individuals to tell their own stories and express their own perspectives, which can help to humanize research and give voice to marginalized communities.
• Holistic understanding: Narrative analysis allows researchers to understand individuals’ experiences in their entirety, including the social, cultural, and historical contexts in which they occur.
• Flexibility : Narrative analysis is a flexible research method that can be applied to a wide range of contexts and research questions.
• Interpretive insights: Narrative analysis provides interpretive insights into the meanings that individuals attach to their experiences and the ways in which they construct their identities.
• Appropriate for sensitive topics: Narrative analysis can be particularly useful in researching sensitive topics, such as trauma or mental health, as it allows individuals to express their experiences in their own words and on their own terms.
• Can lead to policy implications: Narrative analysis can provide insights that can inform policy decisions and interventions, particularly in areas such as health, education, and social policy.

Limitations of Narrative Analysis

Here are some of the limitations of narrative analysis:

• Subjectivity : Narrative analysis relies on the interpretation of researchers, which can be influenced by their own biases and assumptions.
• Limited generalizability: Narrative analysis typically involves in-depth analysis of a small number of cases, which limits its generalizability to broader populations.
• Ethical considerations: The process of eliciting and analyzing narratives can raise ethical concerns, particularly when sensitive topics such as trauma or abuse are involved.
• Limited control over data collection: Narrative analysis often relies on data that is already available, such as interviews, oral histories, or written texts, which can limit the control that researchers have over the quality and completeness of the data.
• Time-consuming: Narrative analysis can be a time-consuming research method, particularly when analyzing large amounts of data.
• Interpretation challenges: Narrative analysis requires researchers to make complex interpretations of data, which can be challenging and time-consuming.
• Limited statistical analysis: Narrative analysis is typically a qualitative research method that does not lend itself well to statistical analysis.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Descriptive Statistics – Types, Methods and...

Data Analysis – Process, Methods and Types

Discriminant Analysis – Methods, Types and...

Critical Analysis – Types, Examples and Writing...

MANOVA (Multivariate Analysis of Variance) –...

Uniform Histogram – Purpose, Examples and Guide

• Advanced search

Advanced Search

A Narrative Approach to Qualitative Inquiry

• Find this author on Google Scholar
• Find this author on PubMed
• Search for this author on this site
• For correspondence: [email protected]
• Info & Metrics

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

• University of Kentucky, College of Health Sciences, Lexington, KY
• Address for Correspondence: Michelle Butina, PhD, MLS(ASCP) CM , Assistant Professor and Program Director, Medical Laboratory Science, University of Kentucky, College of Health Sciences, 900 South Limestone Street, CTW Bldg. Rm. 126E, Lexington, KY 40536-0200, (859) 218-0852, Michelle.Butina{at}uky.edu

Provide an example of when narrative inquiry would be the most appropriate qualitative research approach.

Identify the activities involved in data collection.

Define and describe narrative thematic data analysis.

Discuss data verification and validation strategies used in qualitative research approaches.

INTRODUCTION When selecting a research design, such as quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods, Patton (2002) suggested reflecting on the purpose of the inquiry and the types of answers you seek. 1 Qualitative methods allow the researcher to study issues in depth with data collection often occurring through open-ended questions permitting “one to understand and capture the points of view of other people without predetermining those points of view through prior selection of questionnaire categories”. 1 Results include a wealth of detailed information about a small number of people; therefore, leading to an increase in the depth of understanding of these select individuals.

As Creswell (2013) stated, “Those undertaking qualitative studies have a baffling number of choices of approaches”. 2 Qualitative approaches of inquiry are diverse and can be numerous depending upon how they are classified as some classification schemes include 20 plus approaches. 2 Regardless of how they are classified, the traditional 5 approaches are represented, in some fashion, in all classification schemes. These include case studies, ethnography, grounded theory, narrative, and phenomenology. This article will provide the reader with a better understanding of narrative approach or narrative inquiry.

Narrative inquiry is the approach of which I have the most knowledge and the most experience with as it was the approach I selected for my doctoral research study. Narrative inquiry is a form of qualitative research in which the stories themselves become the raw data. 3 This approach has been used in many disciplines to learn more about the culture, historical experiences, identity, and lifestyle…

• Data coding
• data validation
• narrative inquiry
• professional identity
• qualitative research methods
• © Copyright 2015 American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Inc. All rights reserved.

In this issue

• Table of Contents
• Table of Contents (PDF)
• Index by author
• Front Matter (PDF)

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Citation Manager Formats

• EndNote (tagged)
• EndNote 8 (xml)
• RefWorks Tagged
• Ref Manager

• Tweet Widget
• Facebook Like
• Google Plus One

Jump to section

Related articles.

• No related articles found.
• Google Scholar

Cited By...

• Impact of defocus incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses for myopia control on quality of life of the children: a qualitative study
• Practices and challenges of community engagement in health research in Ethiopia: a qualitative study
• The experiences of Indigenous people with cancer in Saskatchewan: a patient-oriented qualitative study using a sharing circle

More in this TOC Section

• Conducting Qualitative Research Introduction
• Conducting Case Study Research

Similar Articles

• data coding

Unsupported Browser Detected. It seems the web browser you're using doesn't support some of the features of this site. For the best experience, we recommend using a modern browser that supports the features of this website. We recommend Google Chrome , Mozilla Firefox , or Microsoft Edge

• Domestic Politics
• Economy and Technology
• Foreign Policy and National Security
• Climate, Energy, and the Environment
• Society, Culture, Public Health, and Education
• Staff and Fellows
• Subscribe to China 5
• Climate & Energy
• Security & Diplomacy
• Trade, Investment, & Innovation
• Society, Technology, & Public Health
• Central Asia
• Southeast Asia
• All Publications
• Initiatives
• Interactives
• Past Events
• How We Work
• Institutional Independence
• Network of Experts
• Schwartz Book Award
• Join Our Email List
• Our Locations

Asia Society Policy Institute

Understanding china's perceptions and strategy toward nuclear weapons: a case study approach, introduction.

Executive Summary

Full Summary Report

The nuclear arsenal of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is undergoing significant transformation, as reported by the 2022 U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) report on China’s military power. In 2021, Beijing accelerated its nuclear expansion, with estimates placing its current stockpile at over 400 warheads, and it is projected to reach 1,500 warheads by 2035, based on a DoD report on China's military power from 2021. In addition, Beijing is also reportedly consolidating its nuclear triad of bombers, submarines, and intercontinental ballistic missiles, as well as moving to a launch-on-warning posture. These quantitative and qualitative improvements are advancing China toward nuclear parity with the United States, significantly impacting strategic calculations in Beijing and Washington, especially during times of heightened instability.

Yet critical gaps remain in understanding how China views nuclear deterrence. Most importantly — and most urgently — there is limited insight into China’s nuclear weapons calculations in potential confrontations with another nuclear power — in this case, the United States. The English-language literature on China’s use of force and crisis management does not focus on PRC nuclear weapons doctrine. The Chinese-language literature on nuclear crisis management is significantly underdeveloped.

To address these critical gaps in understanding, this study, sponsored by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) as part of its Strategic Trends Research Initiative, examines Chinese writings and analyses regarding past crises between nuclear weapons states — including those in which China was involved — to understand what lessons Beijing took from them and how those lessons inform PRC thinking in future crises. Specifically, this report seeks to answer the following questions:

• How do Chinese experts characterize the cause and nature of historical nuclear crises?
• What do Chinese experts view as the major strategic decisions that foreign leaders (or Chinese leaders) made during Cold War nuclear crises, and to what extent did leaders have control over nuclear escalation?
• Do Chinese experts recognize the dangers of dramatic nuclear escalation versus incremental escalation?
• What do Chinese experts identify as the major strategic mistakes or correct decisions that foreign or Chinese leaders make?
• Do Chinese experts view nuclear weapons as mainly useful to deter adversaries from crisis involvement or military escalation, to inflict countervalue or counterforce damage, or for other purposes? 
• What do Chinese experts take from U.S. behavior patterns during historical nuclear crises or escalations?
• What are Beijing’s views of U.S. extended deterrence assurances toward its key allies and partners during conflicts?

This study presents the implications of this research for DTRA and the United States, especially with regard to U.S.-China strategic stability, U.S.-China crisis management, and strategic and conventional deterrence vis-à-vis China.

Methodology

The study used a case study approach to understand Chinese nuclear thinking. The six major case studies include the Korean War of 1950–53, the First and Second Taiwan Strait Crises of 1954–55 and 1958, the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, the 1969 Sino-Soviet border clashes, and the border conflicts between China and India of 2017–20. It was determined that these six cases best captured the breadth of Chinese views on the nuclear deterrent dynamics in terms of historical significance and in terms of actors with different nuclear capabilities. Some, like the Cuban Missile Crisis, had been the subject of in-depth examination by PRC analysts, but of which little had been written in the English language open-source literature. This study utilizes Chinese-language sources, including official PRC government documents, as well as monographs and journal articles written by authors of Chinese Communist Party–affiliated think tanks and military research institutions. The report is also informed by insights drawn from a private workshop composed of subject matter experts held in Washington, D.C., in January 2024.

Key Findings and Recommendations

Below are the report’s overall findings. The full report and its executive summary are also available for download.

• Nuclear deterrence mattered little in China’s use of force calculus. China assesses that the historical role of nuclear weapons, for the most part, played a minor factor in its calculus to use force and, similarly, in other countries’ decisions to use force.
• Nuclear coercion against China was ineffective after the onset of hostilities. In conflicts involving China, Chinese scholars are fairly uniform in their assessment that after the initial use of force in a conflict, nuclear coercion, or “saber-rattling,” by the adversary was generally not effective in managing escalation.
• Strategic balance calculus was influential in the outcome of certain conflicts. Chinese assessments of the Cuban Missile Crisis stand out for their realpolitik flavor, suggesting that the strategic balance between two adversaries before and during a military conflict matters.
• Fears of nuclear “blackmail” remain a powerful narrative in modern Chinese thinking . Preventing the nuclear “blackmail” of China closely followed the deterrence of nuclear aggression as a strategic objective, in large part because Beijing felt itself victimized by U.S. and Soviet nuclear threats at various moments during the early Cold War when it did not have nuclear weapons.
• Retaining a “minimum means of reprisal” matters to deter adversary behavior . After 1964, Chinese scholars assessed that a minimum nuclear deterrent, by its very presence and irrespective of specific vulnerabilities, serves to induce caution on the part of stronger rivals like the United States and the Soviet Union even during serious crises.
• China’s lack of experience in nuclear escalation may lead to miscalculation . Most Chinese historians conclude that China successfully emerged from crises having achieved its limited war aims while controlling escalation in the nuclear domain. However, such confidence may be misplaced and may fail to account for the myriad factors influencing the decision of foreign actors not to retaliate with nuclear weapons.
• The potential to misread nuclear signals remains worrisome . Several assessments by Chinese scholars who expressed skepticism that Chinese leaders received the intended nuclear signaling by the United States raise questions over a “perception gap” within China’s strategic bureaucracy.

Recommendations

• Fund studies that involve Chinese historians to guide current U.S. government “red team” thinking on Chinese nuclear escalation . DTRA should take the lead in funding studies and tabletop exercises that enable the U.S. government and intelligence community to use Chinese history as a guide to inform “red team” thinking.
• Fund Track 2 dialogues with Chinese institutions about the risks of nuclear escalation . DTRA has a unique history of funding Track 2 dialogues on nuclear dynamics with Chinese think tanks and academic institutes. Given this unique history, and while progress on Track 1 dialogues with China on arms control remains stalled, DTRA should consider funding new Track 2 dialogues with Chinese institutions.
• Push for arms control and risk reduction with China . DTRA should join the various stakeholders within the U.S. government in advocating for arms control with China, bearing in mind that arms control in the future will probably look different from how it evolved with the Soviet Union during the Cold War.
• Invest in more Chinese-language primary source materials . While this study sheds new light on China’s views of nuclear coercion, the continued availability of Chinese-language resources appears more challenging than in the past. DTRA would benefit from taking the lead to fund additional sources of Chinese-language materials for the U.S. government.

This research was sponsored by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency as part of its Strategic Trends Research Initiative as #HDTRA1-23-P-0033 between DTRA and the Asia Society Policy Institute. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of DTRA, the U.S. Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Author Biographies
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

How students learn during the pre-briefing and observation of facilitation in a high-fidelity patient simulation: a narrative analysis, 1. introduction, background and literature review, 2. materials and methods, 2.1. study design, 2.2. study aim and objectives, 2.3. sampling and study setting, 2.4. the structured hfps guidelines, 2.5. the instruments, 2.6. study procedure, 2.7. ethical considerations, 2.8. data analysis, 3.1. students’ demographhic characteristics, 3.2. student learning at pre-briefing and the period of being observers during facilitation, 3.3. learning at pre-briefing stage, 3.3.1. adequate learning resources to increase knowledge acquisition, 3.3.2. clear instruction and guidelines, 3.3.3. adequate time for preparation, 3.3.4. self-motivation for competence enhancement in knowledge and skills, 3.4. learning from observation of hfps, 3.4.1. performance of role-players with knowledge and skill applications, 3.4.2. comments on the performance by others, 3.4.3. discussion with other students who were observers, 3.5. in both sessions, 3.5.1. clear guiding questions and observation areas, 3.5.2. self-awareness and attentiveness, 3.5.3. active self-engagement, 4. discussion, 4.1. practical recommendations, 4.2. strengths and limitations, 5. conclusions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Lee, J.; Lee, Y.; Lee, S.; Bae, J. Effects of high-fidelity patient simulation led clinical reasoning course: Focused on nursing core competencies, problem solving, and academic self-efficacy. Jpn. J. Nurs. Sci. 2016 , 13 , 20–28. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wong, F.M.F.; Wong, D.C.N. A Modified Guideline for High-Fidelity Patient Simulation to Improve Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning: A Mixed Study. Nurs. Rep. 2023 , 13 , 1030–1039. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, Z.; Huang, F.F.; Chen, S.S.; Wang, A.; Guo, Y. The learning effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation teaching among Chinese nursing students: A mixed-methods study. J. Nurs. Res. 2021 , 29 , e141. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wong, F.M.F.; Chan, A.M.L.; Lee, N.P.M.; Luk, K.K.H. Can High-Fidelity Patient Simulation Be Used for Skill Development in Junior Undergraduate Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Healthcare 2023 , 11 , 2221. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yeo, J.Y.; Jang, M.S. Nursing students’ self-directed learning experiences in web-based virtual simulation: A qualitative study. Jpn. J. Nurs. Sci. 2022 , 20 , e12514. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yang, G.F.; Jiang, X.Y. Self-directed learning readiness and nursing competency among undergraduate nursing students in Fujian province of China. Int. J. Nurs. Sci. 2014 , 1 , 255–259. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aljohani, A.S.; Karim, Q.; George, P. Students’ satisfaction with simulation learning environment in relation to self-confidence and learning achievement. J. Health Sci. 2016 , 4 , 228–235. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dalton, L.; Gee, T.; Levett-Jones, T. Using clinical reasoning and simulation-based education to ‘flip’ the enrolled nurse curriculum. Aust. J. Adv. Nurs. 2015 , 33 , 2–15. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gopalakrishnan, P.; Sethuraman, K.R.; Suresh, P. Efficacy of high-fidelity simulation in clinical problem-solving exercises—Feedback from teachers and learners. SBV J. Basic. Clin. Appl. Health Sci. 2018 , 2 , 14–22. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Welman, A.; Spies, C. High-fidelity simulation in nursing education: Considerations for meaningful learning. Trends Nurs. 2016 , 3 , 1–16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• INACSL Standards Committee. Healthcare simulation standards of best practice—Prebriefing: Preparation and briefing. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 2021 , 58 , 9–13. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• INACSL Standards Committee. Healthcare simulation standards of best practice—Facilitation. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 2021 , 58 , 22–26. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tutticci, N.; Theobald, K.A.; Ramsbotham, J.; Johnston, S. Exploring the observer role and clinical reasoning in simulation: A scoping review. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2022 , 59 , 103301. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harder, N.; Ross, C.J.M.; Paul, P. Student Perspective of Roles Assignment in High-Fidelity Simulation: An Ethnographic Study. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 2013 , 9 , e329–e334. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Henrique-Sanches, B.C.; Cecilio-Fernandes, D.; Costa, R.R.; Almeida, R.G.; Etchegoyen, F.F.; Mazzo, A. Implications of clinical simulation in motivation for learning: Scoping review. Einstein 2024 , 22 , eRW0792. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tekkol, I.A.; Demirel, M. An investigation of self-directed learning skills of undergraduate students. Front. Psychol. 2018 , 9 , 2324. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wu, H.; Zheng, J.; Li, S.; Guo, J. Does academic interest play a more important role in medical sciences than in other disciplines? A nationwide cross-sectional study in China. BMC Med. Educ. 2019 , 19 , 301. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chamberlain, J. The impact of simulation prebriefing on perceptions of overall effectiveness, learning, and self-confidence in nursing students. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 2017 , 38 , 119–125. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Page-Cutrara, K. Prebriefing in nursing simulation: A concept analysis. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 2015 , 11 , 335–340. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Levett-Jones, T.; Andersen, P.; Reid-Searl, K.; Guinea, S.; McAllister, M.; Lapkin, S.; Palmer, L.; Niddrie, M. Tag team simulation: An innovative approach for promoting active engagement of participants and observers during group simulations. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2015 , 15 , 345–352. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Thidemann, I.J. Olle Söderhamn, High-fidelity simulation among bachelor students in simulation groups and use of different roles. Nurse Educ. Today 2013 , 33 , 1599–1604. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wong, F.M.F.; Tang, A.C.Y.; Cheng, W.L.S. Factors associated with self-directed learning among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review. Nurse Educ. Today 2021 , 104 , 104998. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• London, M.; Sessa, V.L.; Shelley, L.A. Developing self-awareness: Learning process for self-and interpersonal growth. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2023 , 10 , 261–288. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rasheed, S.P.; Sundus, A.; Younas, A.; Fakhar, J.; Inayat, S. Development and testing of a measure of self-awareness among nurses. West. J. Nurs. Res. 2021 , 4391 , 36–44. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lin, X.D.; Lin, Y.; Liu, X.Y.; Su, W.J.; Nie, R.J. The status of study engagement and its influencing factors among nursing arts undergraduates. Chin. J. Nurs. Educ. 2018 , 15 , 770–774. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jacobs, C.; Rigby, J.M. Developing measures of immersion and motivation for learning technologies in healthcare simulation: A pilot study. J. Adv. Med. Educ. Prof. 2022 , 10 , 163–171. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Abelsson, A.; Bisholt, B. Nurse students learning acute care by simulation—Focus on observation and debriefing. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2017 , 24 , 6–13. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chang, Y.; Brickman, P. When group work doesn’t work: Insights from students. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 2018 , 17 , ar52. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wighus, M.; Bjørk, I.T. An educational intervention to enhance clinical skills learning: Experiences of nursing students and teachers. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2018 , 29 , 143–149. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Alshehri, F.D.; Jone, S.; Harrison, D. The effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation on undergraduate nursing students’ clinical reasoning-related skills: A systematic review. Nurse Educ. Today 2023 , 121 , 105679. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kim-Godwin, Y.S.; Livsey, K.R.; Ezzell, D.; Highsmith, C. Home Visit Simulation Using a Standardized Patient. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 2013 , 9 , e55–e61. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wong, F.M.F. A phenomenological research study: Perspectives of student learning through small group work between undergraduate nursing students and educators. Nurse Educ. Today 2018 , 68 , 153–158. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hober, C.; Bonnel, W. Student Perceptions of the Observer Role in High-Fidelity Simulation. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 2014 , 10 , 507–514. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Connor Desai, S.; Reimers, S. Comparing the use of open and closed questions for Web-based measures of the continued-influence effect. Behav. Res. Methods 2019 , 51 , 1426–1440. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hyman, M.R.; Sierra, J.J. Open-versus close-ended survey questions. Bus. Outlook 2016 , 14 , 105. [ Google Scholar ]

Share and Cite

Wong, F.M.F. How Students Learn during the Pre-Briefing and Observation of Facilitation in a High-Fidelity Patient Simulation: A Narrative Analysis. Healthcare 2024 , 12 , 1761. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171761

Wong FMF. How Students Learn during the Pre-Briefing and Observation of Facilitation in a High-Fidelity Patient Simulation: A Narrative Analysis. Healthcare . 2024; 12(17):1761. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171761

Wong, Florence M. F. 2024. "How Students Learn during the Pre-Briefing and Observation of Facilitation in a High-Fidelity Patient Simulation: A Narrative Analysis" Healthcare 12, no. 17: 1761. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171761

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Participatory actions for investigating eco-craft trail activities: a case of Pinglin in Taiwan

• Published: 05 September 2024

Cite this article

• Ming-Feng Huang 1 &
• Li-Pei Peng   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6855-1253 1  

The "eco-craft trail" is firmly grounded in the principles of nature-based solutions (NBS), which advocate for the preservation of ecology. It adopts a site-specific intervention approach that considers natural and cultural contexts to restore trail facilities while prioritizing the protection of the natural environment and the preservation of cultural and historical characteristics. Moreover, it aimed to engage local communities in local affairs or by convening volunteers on a working holiday. However, there has been less focus on the divergence in context-specific knowledge between local residents and outsider participants in NBS events, as well as the identified implications for rural governance. This paper aims to address these theoretical gaps by examining a case study of eco-craft trail maintenance through a participatory action process. Our study involved conducting participatory action research, including in-depth interviews with 17 participants, to explore the rural governance in Pinglin before and after eco-craft trail maintenance events. The research revealed that local residents in Pinglin demonstrate a significant level of commitment to environmental conservation and exhibit a strong sense of attachment to their local community. Within the framework of multi-stakeholder collaboration, our study found that local individuals, as opposed to outsider volunteers, display a reluctance to deviate from their established work habits. This phenomenon, referred to as tshiú-lōo in Taiwanese, embodies a collective body memory rooted in customary knowledge and physical skills unique to the local community. This paper suggests that the maintenance of eco-craft trails cannot solely rely on government resources. Instead, it necessitates comprehensive training and preparation to effectively integrate local residents with outsider volunteers in collaborative efforts. Recommendations for enhancing multi-stakeholder collaboration are essential for advancing environmental conservation, rural governance, and facilitating sustainable transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Explore related subjects

• Medical Ethics
• Environmental Chemistry

Aberbach JD, Rockman BA (2002) Conducting and coding elite interviews. PS: Polit Sci Polit 35(4):673–676

Google Scholar  

Babchuk W, Eileen B (2022) Grounded theory. Int Encyclop Educ 18:1–17

Baldassarre B, Keskin D, Diehl JC, Bocken N, Calabretta G (2020) Implementing sustainable design theory in business practice: a call to action. J Clean Prod 273:1–17

Berger AA (2011) Interviews. In Arthur Asa Berger (eds), Media and communication research methods: an introduction to qualitative and quantitative approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, pp135–152

Booth A, Halseth G (2011) Why the public thinks natural resources public participation processes fail: a case study of British Columbia communities. Land Use Policy 28(4):898–906

Chang SE (2013) Blue Magpie TEAgriculture: eco-tea cultivation and participatory farming in Pinglin Satoyama. Taiwan Proc Soc Behav Sci 101:14–22

Chen L, Chang SE (2015) Building and recovering rural economic landscapes: the case of liquor and tea industries in Taiwan. Proc Soc Behav Sci 202:408–416

Chen P, Tsai H, Hsu S (2019) Analysis of the managerial efficiency of tea plantations in Pinglin area. Taiwan J Appl Econ 106:67–107

Chen Y, Lee BV (2023) Application of information technology and innovative cooperation: a case study of “Social Innovation Enterprise T” promoting sustainable development of Pinglin organic tea. J Lib Arts Soc Sci 19(1):1–26

Chiang HH, Basu M, Hoshino S, Onitsuka K, Shimizu N (2021) The role of territorial conflicts in multi-municipal water governance: a case study from Taipei Metropolis. Local Environ 1:1–19

Chiang HH, Basu M, Sianipar CPM, Onitsuka K, Hoshino S (2021) Capital and symbolic power in water quality governance: stakeholder dynamics in managing nonpoint sources pollution. J Environ Manag 290:1–12

Cohen-Shacham E, Walters G, Janzen C and Maginnis S (eds) (2016) Nature-based Solutions to address global societal challenges. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, pp xiii + 97

Chiang H, Wang C, Huang J (2018) The extended urbanization of water: the territorial governance of Pinglin water protection area. City Plann 45(2):131–160

Eagleston H, Marion JL (2020) Application of airborne LiDAR and GIS in modeling trail erosion along the Appalachian Trail in New Hampshire, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 198:1–9

Evju M, Hagen D, Jokerud M, Olsen SL, Selvaag SK, Vistad OI (2020) Effects of mountain biking versus hiking on trails under different environmental conditions. J Environ Manage 278:1–9

Given LM (2008) The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage, New York

Guell C, Ogilvie D (2015) Picturing commuting: photovoice and seeking well-being in everyday travel. Qual Res 15(2):201–218

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Hoicka CE, Savic K, Campney A (2021) Reconciliation through renewable energy? A survey of Indigenous communities, involvement, and peoples in Canada. Energy Res Soc Sci 74:1–15

Hsu CF, Hsu MC (2010) Making National Forest Recreation Areas as Accessible Tourism Sites in Taiwan through collaborative effort of grassroots organizations, Trails: The Green Way for America 20th American Trails National Symposium Chattanooga, Tennessee ~ Nov 14–17

Hsu MC (2007) From Appalachia to Chakara—Observations from a trail volunteer (In Chinese). Taiwan Forest J 33:88–95

Hsu MC (2021) Across the administrative boundaries—the first mile of the Long685 distance trail collaboration in Taiwan. Tour Plann Dev 1:1–10

Hu C, Chen F (2017) Study on the relationship between shaded tea garden and ant diversity in Pinglin, New Taipei City. Quart J Chin for 50(3):215–233

Huang MF, Peng LP (2023) Extracting evaluation factors of social resilience in water resource protection areas using the Fuzzy Delphi method. Sustainability 15:1–19

Huang PC (2022) A preliminary study on the symbolic struggle for tourism and recreation Brands: the Pinglin tea as an example. Leisure Soc Res 25:11–34

Jong E, Vijge MJ (2020) From millennium to sustainable development goals: evolving 19 discourses and their reflection in policy coherence for development. Economics, pp 1–25

Kwok AH, Doyle EHE, Becker J, Johnston D, Paton D (2016) What is ‘social resilience’? Perspectives of disaster researchers, emergency management practitioners, and policymakers in New Zealand. Int J Disaster Risk Reduc 19:197–211

Li J, Krishnamurthy S, Roders AP, Wesemael PV (2020) Informing or consulting? Exploring community participation within urban heritage management in China. Habitat Int 105:1–11

Lindlof RT, Taylor CB (2011) Producing Data II: Qualitative Interviewing. In: Lindlof TR, Taylor BC (eds) Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Sage Publications, Los Angeles, pp 170–216

Liotas ED, Charatsari C, Rosa MD (2021) Digitalization of agriculture: A way to solve the food problem or a trolley dilemma? Technol Soc 67:1–8

Marques S, Lima ML, Moreira S, Reis J (2015) Local identity as an amplifier: procedural justice, local identity and attitudes towards new dam projects. J Environ Psychol 44:63–73

Mihalic T (2020) Conceptualising overtourism: a sustainability approach. Ann Tour Res 84:1–12

Ng SL (2022) Is surfacing a good choice for trail management? Evidence from four high708 use hiking trails in Hong Kong. J Soil Water Conserv 77(6):600–608

Pei Z (2019) Roles of neighborhood ties, community attachment and local identity in residents’ household waste recycling intention. J Clean Prod 241:1–9

Peng LP (2020) Understanding human–nature connections through landscape socialization. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(20):1–18

Peng LP (2023) Understanding leverage points of rural activities on hillsides in Taiwan. Sustain Sci 18:1705–1719

Phillipson J, Tiwasing P, Gorton M, Maioli S, Newbery R, Turner T (2019) Shining a spotlight on small rural businesses: How does their performance T compare with urban? J Rural Stud 68:230–239

Postula M, Moroz KR (2020) Fiscal policy instruments in environmental protection. Environ Impact Assess Rev 84:1–9

Rickenbacker H, Brown F, Bilec M (2019) Creating environmental consciousness in underserved communities: implementation and outcomes of community-based environmental justice and air pollution research. Sustain Cities Soc 47:1–11

Salesa D, Cerda A (2020) Soil erosion on mountain trails as a consequence of recreational activities. A comprehensive review of the scientific literature. J Environ Manag 271:1–13

Serrano DP, Cabirol N, Cervantes CM, Oropeza MR (2021) Mesquite management in the Mezquital Valley: a sustainability assessment based on the view point of the Hñähñú 20 indigenous community. Environ Sustain Indic 10:1–12

Snorek J, Renaud FG, Kloos J (2014) Divergent adaptation to climate variability: a case study of pastoral and agricultural societies in Niger. Glob Environ Chang 29:371–386

Spernbauer BS, Monz C, Antonio AD, Smith JW (2023) Factors influencing informal trail conditions: implications for management and research in Urban-Proximate parks and protected areas. Landsc Urban Plan 231:1–25

Thomas DR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 27:237–246

Yang MS (2006) Issues on the interpretation and guidance of leisure agricultural development in Pinglin Township (In Chinese). Agric Ext Anthol 51: 295–306

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Bio-Industry Communication and Development, College of Bio-Resources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

Ming-Feng Huang & Li-Pei Peng

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Pei Peng .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Huang, MF., Peng, LP. Participatory actions for investigating eco-craft trail activities: a case of Pinglin in Taiwan. Paddy Water Environ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-024-00996-4

Download citation

Received : 06 April 2024

Revised : 13 July 2024

Accepted : 25 July 2024

Published : 05 September 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-024-00996-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Eco-craft trail
• Nature-based solutions
• Multi-stakeholder collaboration
• Rural governance
• Sustainable transformation
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research