tensile test experiment lab report

• No category

Tensile Test Lab Report

Related documents.

Add this document to collection(s)

You can add this document to your study collection(s)

Add this document to saved

You can add this document to your saved list

Suggest us how to improve StudyLib

(For complaints, use another form )

Input it if you want to receive answer

• Faculty/Staff
• MyMichiganTech
• Safety Data Sheets
• Website Settings
• Engineering
• Materials Science and Engineering
• Virtual Experiments

Tensile Test Experiment

One material property that is widely used and recognized is the strength of a material. But what does the word "strength" mean? "Strength" can have many meanings, so let us take a closer look at what is meant by the strength of a material. We will look at a very easy experiment that provides lots of information about the strength or the mechanical behavior of a material, called the tensile test .

What is a Tensile Test?

Tensile test procedure.

• Tensile Tests of Composites
• Virtual Experiment Examples

The basic idea of a tensile test is to place a sample of a material between two fixtures called "grips" which clamp the material. The material has known dimensions, like length and cross-sectional area. We then begin to apply weight to the material gripped at one end while the other end is fixed. We keep increasing the weight (often called the load or force) while at the same time measuring the change in length of the sample.

One can do a very simplified test at home.

If you have a way to hang one end of some material from a solid point that does not move, then you can hang weights on the other end.

Measure the change in length while adding weight until the part begins to stretch and finally breaks.

The result of this test is a graph of load (amount of weight) versus displacement (amount it stretched). Since the amount of weight needed to stretch the material depends on the size of the material (and of course the properties of the material), comparison between materials can be very challenging. The ability to make a proper comparison can be very important to someone designing for structural applications where the material must withstand certain forces.

• Animated GIF

Cross-Sectional Areas

We need a way of directly being able to compare different materials, making the “strength” we report independent of the size of the material. We can do that by simply dividing the load applied to the material (the weight or force) by the initial cross-sectional area. We also divide the amount it moves (displacement) by the initial length of the material. This creates what material scientists refer to as engineering stress (load divided by the initial cross-sectional area) and engineering strain (displacement divided by initial length). By looking at the engineering stress-strain response of a material we can compare the strength of different materials, independently of their sizes.

To use the stress-strain response for designing structures, we can divide the load we want by the engineering stress to determine the cross-sectional area needed to be able to hold that load. For example, a 1/8” diameter 4340 steel wire can hold a small car. Again, it is not always that simple. We need to understand the different meanings of “strength” or engineering stress.

Stress Versus Strain

Now it gets more complicated. Let us take a look at what is meant by the different strength values and also look at other important properties we can get from this simple test. The easiest way is to examine a graph of engineering stress versus engineering strain. Shown below is a graph of a tensile test for a common steel threaded rod, providing a good example of a general metal tensile test. The units of engineering stress are ksi , which stands for a thousand pounds per square inch. Note the reference to area in the units. The units on strain are of course unitless, since we are dividing distance by distance.

Let us discuss some of the important areas of the graph. First, the point on the graph labeled number 1 indicates the end of the elastic region of the curve. Up to this point, the material stretches in an elastic or reversible manner.

All materials are made up of a collection of atoms. Elasticity can be best understood by imaging the atoms are connected by springs. As we pull on the material, the springs between the atoms get longer and the material lengthens. The elastic portion of the curve is a straight line. A straight line indicates that the material will go back to its original shape when the load is removed.

The next portion of the curve of interest is point 2. At this point the curve has begun to bend over, or is no longer linear. This point is known as the 0.2% offset yield strength. It indicates the strength of the material just as it starts to permanently change shape. It is determined as the value of the stress at which a line of the same slope as the initial portion (elastic region) of the curve that is offset by a strain of 0.2% or a value of 0.002 strain intersects the curve.

In our example, the 0.2% offset yield strength is a 88 ksi.

This is a very important aspect of strength. It basically tells us the amount of stress we can apply before the material starts to permanently change shape, putting it on a path to eventual failure. Those who design parts that are used under stress must see that the stress or force on the part never exceeds this value.

Our example shows a strain of 0.15. The 15% change in length is the amount of “ductility”.

When the sample fractures or breaks the load is released. Therefore, the atoms elastically stretched will return to their non-loaded positions. Other information about the mechanical response of a material can also be gathered from a fracture test.

Tensile Tests Procedures for Composites

If one pulls on a material until it breaks, one can find out lots of information about the various strengths and mechanical behaviors of a material. In this virtual experiment we will examine the tensile behavior of three different composite fiber materials. They have similar uses but very different properties.

All of these composites use epoxy as a matrix, which “glues” the fabric like arrangement of the fibers of the respective materials.

Epoxies are thermosetting network polymers, which are very hard and strong, but on the brittle side.

P=Poor, G=Good, F=Fair, E=Excellent

Description: The apparatus pulls on each end of the material until it fractures.

Fiberglass 00:00 Kevlar 01:10 Carbon Fiber 03:09

The video is 5 minutes and 5 seconds with no audio.

Executive Producer Ed Laitila Host Stephen Forsell Videographer Britta Lundberg

Raw Data for Fiberglass

The displacement increases from zero to a little over 5 mm. The load increases almost linearly from 0 to about 12 kN before dropping almost vertically.

Corrected Data For Fiberglass

The engineering strain increases from zero to about 0.10. The engineering stress increases linearly from zero to about 170 MPa, the fracture strength. The modulus is 1.7 GPa.

Corrected Data for Kevlar

The engineering strain increases from zero to about 0.11. The engineering stress increases linearly from zero to about 265 MPa, the fracture strength. The modulus is 2.3 GPa.

Corrected Data for Carbon Fiber

The engineering strain increases from zero to about 0.10. The engineering stress increases linearly from zero to about 580 MPa, the fracture strength. The modulus is 5.7 GPa.

Conclusions

The carbon fiber composite material has a much higher tensile strength and modulus of elasticity than the other materials. Note they all break in a “brittle” manner, as the curve is linear until it breaks or fractures with no bending of the curve at high loads. Consequently, there is no permanent change in original shape during this test, and hence no ductility.

Additional Virtual Experiment Examples

You have seen the experiments for the composite materials. Compare the composite material stress-strain curves with those for polymer and steel.

Tensile Test Steel

The necking steel sample has a continuous stress strain relationship. The stress increases almost vertically, then drops gradually.

Tensile Test Polymer

The stretching polymer sample has a discontinuous stress strain relationship. The stress increases almost vertically, then drops and increases unevenly.

Below are optical photos of the broken or fractured samples, along with close ups of the fracture surface, taken with a scanning electron microscope. Study of these fracture surfaces is also a very important part of materials science and engineering , making this an area of specialty.

Carbon Fiber

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

22919957-Tensile-Test-Lab-Report

Related Papers

Sikiru Bolakale

Tawhid Mahmud

Amber Arfan

Kazeem Kayode Adewole

Luboš Kloc

This paper describes the results of tensile tests carried out on 99.95% high purity oxygen-free copper (OFC) and determine the ductile fracture from the stress-strain graph and diagrams of scanning electron microscopy. Results shows that the average number of grain through thickness varying mechanism of ductile fracture, fracture mode is determined by the combination of size effect and surface roughening. Fracture strain and dimples on the fracture surface decreased with simulated surface roughness. Stress, strain, yield stress and ultimate strength of the copper can be found from stress-strain graph and from the structure and shape of the graph, copper considered in ductile. The crack of copper can said in stable and slow from the graph compare to brittle fracture. Physically, the cup-and-cone shape of deformation around necking region shows that copper is ductile. Fibrous and dimple region shows on microscopy diagrams indicate the behaviour of copper as well. Copper fracture start from void nucleation, void coalescence, crack formation and final fracture. Highly ductile fracture lead specimen necks down to a point and moderately ductile specimen fracture after some necking. The transgranular and intergranular fracture observed on dimple surface area from scanning electron microscope

JAMIU KOLAWOLE ODUSOTE

International Journal of Fracture

Horacio Espinosa

Yarhands Dissou Arthur

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Nazmul Ahsan

Tariq Almistarehi

Abdelrahman shanab

Materials Science and Engineering: A

Lav Kush Kumar

Deniz Akyazı

Mechanics of Materials

Masayuki Kamaya

The Open Biomedical Engineering Journal

Jason Carey

International Journal of Impact Engineering

kasilingam Senthil

European Scientific Journal ESJ

Journal of Materials Science

abdullah akça

Ashenafi Atsbaha

Microelectronics Reliability

Vincent B.C. Tan

Long Bin Tan

Wojciech Jurczak

Asad Seeyab

IRJET Journal

Igor Moravčík

vamsi krishna

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024