How to Write Critical Reviews
When you are asked to write a critical review of a book or article, you will need to identify, summarize, and evaluate the ideas and information the author has presented. In other words, you will be examining another person’s thoughts on a topic from your point of view.
Your stand must go beyond your “gut reaction” to the work and be based on your knowledge (readings, lecture, experience) of the topic as well as on factors such as criteria stated in your assignment or discussed by you and your instructor.
Make your stand clear at the beginning of your review, in your evaluations of specific parts, and in your concluding commentary.
Remember that your goal should be to make a few key points about the book or article, not to discuss everything the author writes.
![](http://ortec.site/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Understanding the Assignment
To write a good critical review, you will have to engage in the mental processes of analyzing (taking apart) the work–deciding what its major components are and determining how these parts (i.e., paragraphs, sections, or chapters) contribute to the work as a whole.
Analyzing the work will help you focus on how and why the author makes certain points and prevent you from merely summarizing what the author says. Assuming the role of an analytical reader will also help you to determine whether or not the author fulfills the stated purpose of the book or article and enhances your understanding or knowledge of a particular topic.
Be sure to read your assignment thoroughly before you read the article or book. Your instructor may have included specific guidelines for you to follow. Keeping these guidelines in mind as you read the article or book can really help you write your paper!
Also, note where the work connects with what you’ve studied in the course. You can make the most efficient use of your reading and notetaking time if you are an active reader; that is, keep relevant questions in mind and jot down page numbers as well as your responses to ideas that appear to be significant as you read.
Please note: The length of your introduction and overview, the number of points you choose to review, and the length of your conclusion should be proportionate to the page limit stated in your assignment and should reflect the complexity of the material being reviewed as well as the expectations of your reader.
Write the introduction
Below are a few guidelines to help you write the introduction to your critical review.
Introduce your review appropriately
Begin your review with an introduction appropriate to your assignment.
If your assignment asks you to review only one book and not to use outside sources, your introduction will focus on identifying the author, the title, the main topic or issue presented in the book, and the author’s purpose in writing the book.
If your assignment asks you to review the book as it relates to issues or themes discussed in the course, or to review two or more books on the same topic, your introduction must also encompass those expectations.
Explain relationships
For example, before you can review two books on a topic, you must explain to your reader in your introduction how they are related to one another.
Within this shared context (or under this “umbrella”) you can then review comparable aspects of both books, pointing out where the authors agree and differ.
In other words, the more complicated your assignment is, the more your introduction must accomplish.
Finally, the introduction to a book review is always the place for you to establish your position as the reviewer (your thesis about the author’s thesis).
As you write, consider the following questions:
- Is the book a memoir, a treatise, a collection of facts, an extended argument, etc.? Is the article a documentary, a write-up of primary research, a position paper, etc.?
- Who is the author? What does the preface or foreword tell you about the author’s purpose, background, and credentials? What is the author’s approach to the topic (as a journalist? a historian? a researcher?)?
- What is the main topic or problem addressed? How does the work relate to a discipline, to a profession, to a particular audience, or to other works on the topic?
- What is your critical evaluation of the work (your thesis)? Why have you taken that position? What criteria are you basing your position on?
Provide an overview
In your introduction, you will also want to provide an overview. An overview supplies your reader with certain general information not appropriate for including in the introduction but necessary to understanding the body of the review.
Generally, an overview describes your book’s division into chapters, sections, or points of discussion. An overview may also include background information about the topic, about your stand, or about the criteria you will use for evaluation.
The overview and the introduction work together to provide a comprehensive beginning for (a “springboard” into) your review.
- What are the author’s basic premises? What issues are raised, or what themes emerge? What situation (i.e., racism on college campuses) provides a basis for the author’s assertions?
- How informed is my reader? What background information is relevant to the entire book and should be placed here rather than in a body paragraph?
Write the body
The body is the center of your paper, where you draw out your main arguments. Below are some guidelines to help you write it.
Organize using a logical plan
Organize the body of your review according to a logical plan. Here are two options:
- First, summarize, in a series of paragraphs, those major points from the book that you plan to discuss; incorporating each major point into a topic sentence for a paragraph is an effective organizational strategy. Second, discuss and evaluate these points in a following group of paragraphs. (There are two dangers lurking in this pattern–you may allot too many paragraphs to summary and too few to evaluation, or you may re-summarize too many points from the book in your evaluation section.)
- Alternatively, you can summarize and evaluate the major points you have chosen from the book in a point-by-point schema. That means you will discuss and evaluate point one within the same paragraph (or in several if the point is significant and warrants extended discussion) before you summarize and evaluate point two, point three, etc., moving in a logical sequence from point to point to point. Here again, it is effective to use the topic sentence of each paragraph to identify the point from the book that you plan to summarize or evaluate.
Questions to keep in mind as you write
With either organizational pattern, consider the following questions:
- What are the author’s most important points? How do these relate to one another? (Make relationships clear by using transitions: “In contrast,” an equally strong argument,” “moreover,” “a final conclusion,” etc.).
- What types of evidence or information does the author present to support his or her points? Is this evidence convincing, controversial, factual, one-sided, etc.? (Consider the use of primary historical material, case studies, narratives, recent scientific findings, statistics.)
- Where does the author do a good job of conveying factual material as well as personal perspective? Where does the author fail to do so? If solutions to a problem are offered, are they believable, misguided, or promising?
- Which parts of the work (particular arguments, descriptions, chapters, etc.) are most effective and which parts are least effective? Why?
- Where (if at all) does the author convey personal prejudice, support illogical relationships, or present evidence out of its appropriate context?
Keep your opinions distinct and cite your sources
Remember, as you discuss the author’s major points, be sure to distinguish consistently between the author’s opinions and your own.
Keep the summary portions of your discussion concise, remembering that your task as a reviewer is to re-see the author’s work, not to re-tell it.
And, importantly, if you refer to ideas from other books and articles or from lecture and course materials, always document your sources, or else you might wander into the realm of plagiarism.
Include only that material which has relevance for your review and use direct quotations sparingly. The Writing Center has other handouts to help you paraphrase text and introduce quotations.
Write the conclusion
You will want to use the conclusion to state your overall critical evaluation.
You have already discussed the major points the author makes, examined how the author supports arguments, and evaluated the quality or effectiveness of specific aspects of the book or article.
Now you must make an evaluation of the work as a whole, determining such things as whether or not the author achieves the stated or implied purpose and if the work makes a significant contribution to an existing body of knowledge.
Consider the following questions:
- Is the work appropriately subjective or objective according to the author’s purpose?
- How well does the work maintain its stated or implied focus? Does the author present extraneous material? Does the author exclude or ignore relevant information?
- How well has the author achieved the overall purpose of the book or article? What contribution does the work make to an existing body of knowledge or to a specific group of readers? Can you justify the use of this work in a particular course?
- What is the most important final comment you wish to make about the book or article? Do you have any suggestions for the direction of future research in the area? What has reading this work done for you or demonstrated to you?
![what is a critical review essay](https://writing.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/535/2018/07/Screen-Shot-2019-08-06-at-6.26.02-PM-e1565383158628.png)
Academic and Professional Writing
This is an accordion element with a series of buttons that open and close related content panels.
Analysis Papers
Reading Poetry
A Short Guide to Close Reading for Literary Analysis
Using Literary Quotations
Play Reviews
Writing a Rhetorical Précis to Analyze Nonfiction Texts
Incorporating Interview Data
Grant Proposals
Planning and Writing a Grant Proposal: The Basics
Additional Resources for Grants and Proposal Writing
Job Materials and Application Essays
Writing Personal Statements for Ph.D. Programs
- Before you begin: useful tips for writing your essay
- Guided brainstorming exercises
- Get more help with your essay
- Frequently Asked Questions
Resume Writing Tips
CV Writing Tips
Cover Letters
Business Letters
Proposals and Dissertations
Resources for Proposal Writers
Resources for Dissertators
Research Papers
Planning and Writing Research Papers
Quoting and Paraphrasing
Writing Annotated Bibliographies
Creating Poster Presentations
Writing an Abstract for Your Research Paper
Thank-You Notes
Advice for Students Writing Thank-You Notes to Donors
Reading for a Review
Critical Reviews
Writing a Review of Literature
Scientific Reports
Scientific Report Format
Sample Lab Assignment
Writing for the Web
Writing an Effective Blog Post
Writing for Social Media: A Guide for Academics
- Jump to menu
- Student Home
- Accept your offer
- How to enrol
- Student ID card
- Set up your IT
- Orientation Week
- Fees & payment
- Academic calendar
- Special consideration
- Transcripts
- The Nucleus: Student Hub
- Referencing
- Essay writing
- Learning abroad & exchange
- Professional development & UNSW Advantage
- Employability
- Financial assistance
- International students
- Equitable learning
- Postgraduate research
- Health Service
- Events & activities
- Emergencies
- Volunteering
- Clubs and societies
- Accommodation
- Health services
- Sport and gym
- Arc student organisation
- Security on campus
- Maps of campus
- Careers portal
- Change password
Structure of a Critical Review
Critical reviews, both short (one page) and long (four pages), usually have a similar structure. Check your assignment instructions for formatting and structural specifications. Headings are usually optional for longer reviews and can be helpful for the reader.
Introduction
The length of an introduction is usually one paragraph for a journal article review and two or three paragraphs for a longer book review. Include a few opening sentences that announce the author(s) and the title, and briefly explain the topic of the text. Present the aim of the text and summarise the main finding or key argument. Conclude the introduction with a brief statement of your evaluation of the text. This can be a positive or negative evaluation or, as is usually the case, a mixed response.
Present a summary of the key points along with a limited number of examples. You can also briefly explain the author’s purpose/intentions throughout the text and you may briefly describe how the text is organised. The summary should only make up about a third of the critical review.
The critique should be a balanced discussion and evaluation of the strengths, weakness and notable features of the text. Remember to base your discussion on specific criteria. Good reviews also include other sources to support your evaluation (remember to reference).
You can choose how to sequence your critique. Here are some examples to get you started:
- Most important to least important conclusions you make about the text.
- If your critique is more positive than negative, then present the negative points first and the positive last.
- If your critique is more negative than positive, then present the positive points first and the negative last.
- If there are both strengths and weakness for each criterion you use, you need to decide overall what your judgement is. For example, you may want to comment on a key idea in the text and have both positive and negative comments. You could begin by stating what is good about the idea and then concede and explain how it is limited in some way. While this example shows a mixed evaluation, overall you are probably being more negative than positive.
- In long reviews, you can address each criterion you choose in a paragraph, including both negative and positive points. For very short critical reviews (one page or less), where your comments will be briefer, include a paragraph of positive aspects and another of negative.
- You can also include recommendations for how the text can be improved in terms of ideas, research approach; theories or frameworks used can also be included in the critique section.
Conclusion & References
This is usually a very short paragraph.
- Restate your overall opinion of the text.
- Briefly present recommendations.
- If necessary, some further qualification or explanation of your judgement can be included. This can help your critique sound fair and reasonable.
If you have used other sources in you review you should also include a list of references at the end of the review.
Summarising and paraphrasing for the critical review
The best way to summarise
- Scan the text. Look for information that can be deduced from the introduction, conclusion, title, and headings. What do these tell you about the main points of the article?
- Locate the topic sentences and highlight the main points as you read.
- Reread the text and make separate notes of the main points. Examples and evidence do not need to be included at this stage. Usually they are used selectively in your critique.
Paraphrasing means putting it into your own words. Paraphrasing offers an alternative to using direct quotations in your summary (and the critique) and can be an efficient way to integrate your summary notes.
The best way to paraphrase
- Review your summary notes
- Rewrite them in your own words and in complete sentences
- Use reporting verbs and phrases, e.g. 'The author describes…', 'Smith argues that …'.
- Use quotation marks if If you include unique or specialist phrases from the text.
Next: Some general criteria for evaluating texts
Essay and assignment writing guide.
- Essay writing basics
- Essay and assignment planning
- Answering assignment questions
- Editing checklist
- Structure of a critical review
- General criteria for evaluating
- Sample extracts
- Annotated bibliography
- Reflective writing
- ^ More support
![what is a critical review essay close](https://www.cipd.org/static/images/Cross.png)
How to write a critical review
Our guide on what it means to think critically when assessing a piece of writing for a student assignment or a workplace project.
When an academic assignment asks you to “critically review” or include a “critical analysis” of the work of other people, it generally means that you’ll need to “think critically”. This means analysing and assessing the work in terms of what the author was trying to achieve, the approach they took, how they conducted the research, and whether the outcomes were valid and acceptable.
A critical review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of an item’s ideas and content. It provides description, analysis and interpretation that assess the item’s value. It’s an exercise that can be carried out on many different types of writing, but is most often carried out on a report, a book or a journal article.
Thousands of publications relevant to HR appear every year, via established journals, websites, management consultancy reports and universities all over the world. With so much information becoming available, many of which offer new ideas, new HR theories and approaches, it’s important that HR practitioners can evaluate whether what they read is valid, sound and unbiased. We can’t take everything we read at face value, and it’s an important skill, and a very important activity to conduct, if you’re going to base corporate change and your proposals to management on information from published sources.
On this page
Selecting an item to review, the critical review process, writing the critical review, useful contacts and books, view our other study guides.
For study purposes, it's likely that you'll be asked to carry out a critical review of one or more journal articles. You may be directed to a specific journal article, or asked to select one based on your own research on a particular topic, or on a topic of your choice.
If you're given options to make a choice, you're more likely to achieve the required outcome if you use well-known academic journals. These might be found in a library, on HR websites such as HR Focus, or via any online journal hosting service, such as EBSCO which is provided free to CIPD members.
An article will only be useful for a critical review assignment if the author has stated what the question was, how the research was done and the outcomes or conclusions based on the facts and evidence listed.
What is a journal?
A journal (sometimes also called a “ periodical ” ) is a publication produced on a regular continuing basis – it may be weekly, monthly, quarterly (every three months) or annually.
The titles of journals (for example The Journal of Occupational Psychology ) indicate the main topic focus of the articles contained in it.
As they are published regularly, journals usually have volume and issue numbers, and sometimes months, to identify them.
A volume usually covers a specific year – so, for example, volume 45 may be all the issues published in 2013.
A n issue number refers to a specific instalment of the journal within that volume – they are often numbered issue or number 1, 2, 3, etc.
A s well as, or instead of, a volume and issue number, some journals use the month of publication. This information is often crucial in finding specific articles.
There are two main types of journal :
Academic journal (also called scholarly journals) – T hese often contain research articles written by subject experts; they contain academic commentary and critical evaluation of issues by experts. The articles will be written in an academic style and they may be “ refereed ” or “ peer-reviewed ” – that is they articles are assessed, often by members of an editorial board who are experts in the field, before they are accepted for publication. Articles from this type of journal are usually suitable for a critical review exercise. The International Journal of Human Resource Management and Harvard Business Review are examples.
Trade or professional journals – T hese usually contain news articles and comment on current issues. The articles often contain practical information and are written in everyday language. They also often have a “ jobs ” section and news of people in that profession. They are likely to be written by journalists rather than academics and don't usually have such rigorous publishing criteria. These articles may not be so suitable for a critical review exercise. People Management is an example.
Take time to:
Think about what content are you expecting, based on the title?
Read the abstract for a summary of the author's arguments.
Study the list of references to determine what research contributed to the author's arguments. Are the references recent? Do they represent important work in the field by accredited authors?
Find out more about the author to learn what authority they have to write about the subject. Have they published other works which have been peer-assessed by other experts?
Read the article carefully, but straight-through the first time to form an impression. You may find it useful to note down your initial reactions and questions. Then re-read it, either right-through or in sections, taking notes of the key ideas. Use these questions as a framework.
Who was the article written for?
Why has the author written the article? To survey and summarise research on a topic? Or to present an argument that builds on past research? Or to disagree with another writer’s stated argument?
Does the author define important terms?
Is the information in the article fact or opinion? Facts can be verified, while opinions arise from perceptions and interpretation.
Is the article well-structured? Is it organised logically and easy to follow?
Is the information well-researched, or is it largely unsupported?
What are the author’s central arguments or conclusions? Are they supported by evidence and analysis?
If the article reports on an experiment or study, does the author clearly outline methodology and the expected result?
Is the article lacking any information or arguments that you expected to find?
For more on effective reading and note-taking, see our guide on studying effectively.
A key part of a critical review is assessing the author's “argument”. In this context, the argument is the line of reasoning or the approach or point of view of the author. It may be the author is defending a particular idea. They may be trying to make a case for something, perhaps a new idea, in which case there would then need to be evidence, examples and a clear set of conclusions coming from the research, or investigation done. To be academically acceptable, any outcomes stated should not be just the author's ideas alone, they must be backed up with valid, appropriate evidence.
Questions to ask yourself about the item you're reviewing are:
Is there a logical progression through the argument?
Do you feel the argument is strong enough?
Is there enough valid evidence?
Does the author make any assumptions and, if so, are they reasonable?
Are any surveys valid – for example, is the sample size representative and large enough for any conclusions to be valid?
Would the findings and conclusions apply to other organisations, or are they too specific? Why?
Do you think the author was biased? Why? For example, it can be useful to think about who funded the research and whether could that have influenced the findings.
It's important to remember that you don't need to agree with the author's views – this would form part of your critical thinking.
A key skill when thinking critically is to be objective in what you are reading or thinking through. Look at both sides of the argument, think of some tests you could do to establish if the ideas are sound. You might apply them to your own organisation for instance.
The output from critical thinking in a professional context is usually a report – a critical review of the item(s) chosen for a given purpose (for example, as student assignment or, in a work setting, to a project team).
The steps are to:
Select your area for review, and the reason for choosing it.
Identify the different information sources reviewed, naming type, when accessed, and through which online database or source.
Explain why you chose these source(s) to review (unless they were given to you).
Highlight and comment on the different research approaches and methods used by the author(s).
Comment on the argument and conclusions, drawing where necessary on your wider research.
If required, make recommendations to named stakeholders for sustaining or improving practice, based on the findings in your sources.
Open University – critical reading techniques
Open University – critically processing what you read
Palgrave Study Skills – critical thinking
CAMERON, S. (2009) The business student's handbook: skills for study and employment . 5th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.
COTTRELL, S. (2013) The study skills handbook . 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
COTTRELL, S. (2011) Critical thinking skills . 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
HORN. R. (2009) The business skills handbook . London: CIPD.
NORTHEDGE, A. (2005) The good study guide . 2nd ed. Milton Keynes: Open University.
OPEN UNIVERSITY. (2007) Develop effective study strategies . Milton Keynes: Open University
Our guide to helping you compile bibliographies based on the Harvard system.
![what is a critical review essay what is a critical review essay](https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/marketing/learning/support-for-students/2023-woman-learning-in-her-free-time51.jpg?width=10&height=5&quality=80&rxy=0.5%2c0.5&rmode=crop)
There are a number of key considerations when developing an approach to studying to suit you. These study tips will help ensure you study effectively.
Practical advice on the report-writing process, with key steps to improve the quality of business reports
An academic essay is a formal piece of writing which presents an argument to the reader. Learn how to write persuasive and robust academic essays.
Our online Community
A place to learn, debate and connect with other HR and L&D professionals
![what is a critical review essay what is a critical review essay](https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/comms/the-people-profession/careers/2023-people-talking-over-laptop-in-cafe-setting39.jpg?width=10&height=6&quality=80&rxy=0.73%2c0.44&rmode=crop)
Interactive career tools, including career assessments, personal development planner, elevator pitch builder, and interview simulator.
![what is a critical review essay what is a critical review essay](https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/marketing/learning/support-for-students/2023-mature-woman-writing-on-paper52.jpg?width=10&height=6&quality=80&rxy=0.5%2c0.5&rmode=crop)
Supporting CIPD members in successful job search
![what is a critical review essay what is a critical review essay](https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/webinars/2023-images/2023-woman-enjoying-hot-beverage-office53.jpg?width=10&height=6&quality=80&rxy=0.5%2c0.5&rmode=crop)
Listen to our webinar to hear how our new qualifications could give you the skills and knowledge you need to excel in the people profession.
Latest guides
![what is a critical review essay what is a critical review essay](https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/guides/2024-images/2024-hr-own-mental-health-guide-gettyimages-1357880802.jpg?width=10&height=6&quality=80&rxy=0.5%2c0.5&rmode=crop)
Advice on how to manage your wellbeing when working in HR
![what is a critical review essay Two women talking](https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/guides/2024-images/ndas-guide.jpg?width=10&height=6&quality=80&rxy=0.5%2c0.5&rmode=crop)
Clear and practical advice on the proper use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) or confidentiality clauses and how to avoid inappropriate use
![what is a critical review essay what is a critical review essay](https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/employment-law/2023-images/2023-employee-thinking-over-computer31.jpg?width=10&height=6&quality=80&rxy=0.5%2c0.5&rmode=crop)
What this practice is, why you should avoid it, and how to approach it if no other options are available
![what is a critical review essay what is a critical review essay](https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/guides/2024-images/2024-manager-guide-sexual-harassment.jpg?width=10&height=6&quality=80&rxy=0.5%2c0.5&rmode=crop)
Practical advice for managers on tackling sexual harassment in the workplace
- Memberships
- Institutional Members
- Teacher Members
![what is a critical review essay Academic English UK](https://academic-englishuk.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/logo-big.png)
Critical Review
by AEUK | May 13, 2024 | Critical thinking , Writing
![what is a critical review essay A critical Review](https://academic-englishuk.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Critical-Review-AEUK-1080x675.png)
Critical Review
What is a critical review.
In very simply terms, a critical review or appraisal is an academic review of an article that offers both a summary and critical comment. Book reviews, movie reviews, critical reviews and literature reviews all perform a similar task of evaluating or appraising how well various texts and artistic productions achieve their goals of communicating with the reader, or a wider audience ( Charles Strut University, 2024. )
A critical review (sometimes called a critique, critical commentary, critical appraisal, critical analysis) is a detailed commentary on and critical evaluation of a text. To be critical does not mean to criticise in an exclusively negative manner. To be critical of a text means you question the information and opinions in the text, in an attempt to evaluate or judge its worth overall ( University of Southampton, 2024) .
A critical review is not just a summary. It is an evaluation of what an author has said about a topic. It is critical in the sense that it is a thoughtful consideration of the validity and accuracy of the author’s claims; considers the benefits and limitations of the author’s point of view; and identifies other valid points of view ( Monash University, 2024 ).
A critical review usually includes the following parts: Summary (What is the text about?), a critical analysis & evaluation (both positive and negative evaluations, e.g. What does the text contribute to the field? What are the limitations of the writer’s approach/conclusions?), and a recommendation (in light of your analysis and evaluation, how should others view this text?) ( Western Sydney University, 2024 ).
How to write a critical review video
A short video on academic writing.
Video Worksheet: click here
A critical review outline.
A critical review usually contains four parts:
- Introduction
- Summary of main ideas
- Evaluation (the critique)
![Critical Review Outline AEUK Critical Review Outline](https://academic-englishuk.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Critical-Review-Outline-AEUK.png)
Evaluation Focus Questions
This is a set of critical questions to think about when reading or listening to a text. These questions help to focus on the key areas to critique.
![Evaluation Focus Questions AEUK Evaluation Focus Questions](https://academic-englishuk.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Evaluation-Focus-Questions-AEUK-.png)
Evaluation Phrases
A set of evaluation phrases that can be used to signal positive and negative areas in a text.
![Evaluation Language AEUK Evaluation Language Phrases](https://academic-englishuk.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Evaluation-Language-AEUK.png)
![](http://ortec.site/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Critical Review Download
Critical review: how to write a critical review (new 2024).
This lesson provides students with the knowledge and practice on how to write a critical review. It includes university critical review definitions, a four-part structure critical review outline, evaluation questions, evaluation phrases, a critical review essay analysis and writing practice. Example . Level: ** * ** [B1/B2/C1] TEACHER MEMBERSHIP / INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERSHIP
£5.50 – Add to cart Checkout Added to cart
Critical Analysis Reading Texts
Text analysis 1: going to university, text analysis 1: going to university (updated 2024).
A great lesson for developing and practising critical thinking reading skills. It is a 400-word text on ‘going to university’ with over 15 possible problems. Students use the higher level thinking skills of analysis and evaluation to examine, question and critique the text . Example. Level: ** ** * [B1/B2/C1] TEACHER MEMBERSHIP / INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERSHIP
£6.50 – Add to cart Checkout Added to cart
Text analysis 2: cost-of-living crisis, text analysis 2: cost-of-living crisis (new 2024).
A great lesson for developing and practising critical thinking reading skills. It is a 400-word text on ‘the cost-of-living crisis’ with over 18 possible problems. Students use the higher level thinking skills of analysis and evaluation to examine, question and critique the text . Example. Level: ** ** * [B1/B2/C1] TEACHER MEMBERSHIP / INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERSHIP
Text Analysis 3: Climate Change
Text analysis 3: climate change: the turning point (new 2024).
A great lesson for developing and practising critical thinking reading skills. It is a 400-word text on ‘Climate Change’ with over 24 possible problems. Students use the higher level thinking skills of analysis and evaluation to examine, question and critique the text . Example. Level: ** ** * [B1/B2/C1] TEACHER MEMBERSHIP / INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERSHIP
Text Analysis 4: Climate Change
Text analysis 4: population growth (new 2024).
A great lesson for developing and practising critical thinking reading skills. It is a 400-word text on ‘population growth’ with over 20 possible problems. Students use the higher level thinking skills of analysis and evaluation to examine, question and critique the text . Example. Level: ** ** * [B1/B2/C1] TEACHER MEMBERSHIP / INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERSHIP
Text Analysis 5: Data Centres
Text analysis 5: data centres (new 2024).
A great lesson for developing and practising critical thinking reading skills. It is a 400-word text on ‘data centres’ with over 26 possible problems. Students use the higher level thinking skills of analysis and evaluation to examine, question and critique the text . Example. Level: ** ** * [B1/B2/C1] TEACHER MEMBERSHIP / INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERSHIP
Memberships (Teacher / Institutional)
Full access to everything - £100 / £200 / £550
Join today * x
More Blog Articles…
![what is a critical review essay Critical Reading 2](https://academic-englishuk.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Critical-Reading-Analysis-2-AEUK-min-400x284.png)
Advertisement:
![Academic English Courses for Students AEUKC-min Academic English Courses for Students](https://academic-englishuk.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Academic-English-Courses-for-Students-AEUKC-min.png)
![what is a critical review essay Banner](https://d1qywhc7l90rsa.cloudfront.net/sites/462/banner/Library_header_LibCal_02.png)
Write a Critical Review
Introduction, how can i improve my critical review, ask us: chat, email, visit or call.
![what is a critical review essay Click to chat: contact the library](https://libapps-ca.s3.amazonaws.com/accounts/1200/images/click_to_chat.jpg)
Video: How to Integrate Critical Voice into Your Literature Review
![what is a critical review essay How to Integrate Critical Voice in Your Lit Review](https://libapps-ca.s3.amazonaws.com/customers/451/images/Video__How_to_integrate_critical_voice_into_your_lit_review.png)
Video: Note-taking and Writing Tips to Avoid Plagiarism
![what is a critical review essay Note-taking and Writing Tips to Avoid Accidental Plagiarism](https://libapps-ca.s3.amazonaws.com/customers/451/images/Video__Note-taking_and_Writing_Tips_to_Avoid_Plagiarism.png)
More help: Writing
- Book Writing Appointments Get help on your writing assignments.
- To introduce the source, its main ideas, key details, and its place within the field
- To present your assessment of the quality of the source
In general, the introduction of your critical review should include
- Author(s) name
- Title of the source
- What is the author's central purpose?
- What methods or theoretical frameworks were used to accomplish this purpose?
- What topic areas, chapters, sections, or key points did the author use to structure the source?
- What were the results or findings of the study?
- How were the results or findings interpreted? How were they related to the original problem (author's view of evidence rather than objective findings)?
- Who conducted the research? What were/are their interests?
- Why did they do this research?
- Was this research pertinent only within the author’s field, or did it have broader (even global) relevance?
- On what prior research was this source-based? What gap is the author attempting to address?
- How important was the research question posed by the researcher?
- Your overall opinion of the quality of the source. Think of this like a thesis or main argument.
- Present your evaluation of the source, providing evidence from the text (or other sources) to support your assessment.
In general, the body of your critical review should include
- Is the material organized logically and with appropriate headings?
- Are there stylistic problems in logical, clarity or language?
- Were the author(s) able to answer the question (test the hypothesis) raised
- What was the objective of the study?
- Does all the information lead coherently to the purpose of the study?
- Are the methods valid for studying the problem or gap?
- Could the study be duplicated from the information provided?
- Is the experimental design logical and reliable?
- How are the data organized? Is it logical and interpretable?
- Do the results reveal what the researcher intended?
- Do the authors present a logical interpretation of the results?
- Have the limitations of the research been addressed?
- Does the study consider other key studies in the field or other research possibilities or directions?
- How was the significance of the work described?
- Follow the structure of the journal article (e.g. Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) - highlighting the strengths and weaknesses in each section
- Present the weaknesses of the article, and then the strengths of the article (or vice versa).
- Group your ideas according to different research themes presented in the source
- Group the strengths and weaknesses of the article into the following areas: originality, reliability, validity, relevance, and presentation
Purpose:
- To summarize the strengths and weaknesses of the article as a whole
- To assert the article’s practical and theoretical significance
In general, the conclusion of your critical review should include
- A restatement of your overall opinion
- A summary of the key strengths and weaknesses of the research that support your overall opinion of the source
- Did the research reported in this source result in the formation of new questions, theories or hypotheses by the authors or other researchers?
- Have other researchers subsequently supported or refuted the observations or interpretations of these authors?
- Did the research provide new factual information, a new understanding of a phenomenon in the field, a new research technique?
- Did the research produce any practical applications?
- What are the social, political, technological, or medical implications of this research?
- How do you evaluate the significance of the research?
- Find out what style guide you are required to follow (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago) and follow the guidelines to create a reference list (may be called a bibliography or works cited).
- Be sure to include citations in the text when you refer to the source itself or external sources.
- Check out our Cite Your Sources Guide for more information.
- Read assignment instructions carefully and refer to them throughout the writing process.
- Make an outline of your main sections before you write.
- If your professor does not assign a topic or source, you must choose one yourself. Select a source that interests you and is written clearly so you can understand it.
- << Previous: Start Here
- Last Updated: Apr 25, 2024 1:53 PM
- URL: https://guides.lib.uoguelph.ca/CriticalReview
Suggest an edit to this guide
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
![what is a critical review essay Federation University Study Skills](https://studyskills.federation.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/FED_colour_logo_medium.png)
Critical Reviews (Summary and Critique)
A Critical Review (also called a ‘Summary and Critique’) is similar to a Annotated Bibliography in that it is a written response to a single text. This text can be a peer-reviewed journal article, a book chapter, or a book. A critical review is usually much longer than an annotated bibliography (800-1000 words or more).
Typically, a critical review will begin with a short introduction, then provide a summary of the key ideas contained in the source text. The summary section should be sufficiently detailed so that the reader does not need to read the original source article. This will be followed immediately by an appraisal or critique of those ideas, after which a short conclusion is provided. The weighting of the summary and critique sections should be approximately equal. Your lecturer might specify additional elements to be included in your critical review (e.g., the search terms used to find source articles, the criteria used to judge an article, or appendices outlining CASP checklists *).
Avoid using quotations when writing a critical review; the review must include your paraphrases of key ideas in the article in the summary section and your own critical evaluation in response to the article in the ‘critique’ section. No headings or subheadings are used in a critical review.
What is a Critique?
What is a critique? It is an assessment of both the positive and negative elements of an article. You must make clear judgments – don’t ‘sit on the fence’.
When you read an article prior to writing a critical review, think about the following:
- Objectives: what does the article set out to do? What is the writer/research intention or purpose?
- Question: what is the research question(s)? Are you convinced by the answers to these questions?
- Hypotheses: Are there specific hypotheses? Are the hypotheses testable?
- Theory: is there an explicit theoretical framework? If not, are there important theoretical assumptions or beliefs?
- Concepts: what are the central concepts in the article? Are they clearly defined? Has the author overlooked key concepts?
- Argument: what is the central argument? Is it valid and are the premises sound? Do you agree with it?
- Method: what methods are employed to test the hypothesis(es)? Are they reasonable (see below)
- Evidence: is evidence provided in the article? How adequate is it?
- Values: what value judgments does the author express? Are they clear or are they tacit/hidden? Should they be made clearer?
- Literature: how does the work fit into the wider literature in the area? Is important literature in the field missing?
- Contribution: how well does the work advance our knowledge of the subject?
- Style: how clear is the author’s language/style/expression? (adapted from ANU, 2022)
In relation to methodological considerations, ask yourself:
- Is the method sound and validated, considering other research in the field?
- Is there a sufficient sample size of participants tested (if a quantitative study)?
- If questionnaires are used, are the questions clear and unambiguous? Fair/unfair?
- Are common flaws identified in the research design, such as confirmation or observer bias, or unexplained or overstated results?
- Does the evidence support the conclusions?
Structure of a Critical Review
The structure of a critical review is shown below. A Critical Review will make liberal use of critical review language and signposting . See examples in bold below.
Introduction
This includes:
- A citation of the article reviewed in a conventional referencing style (usually APA 7th Edition).
- A general overview of the topic, question(s), or aim(s) raised in the text
- An overall evaluative comment on the text being reviewed.
Silva, M. C. (1986). Research testing nursing theory: State of the art. (1), 1-11. the strengths and limitations of Silva’s article and chronicles how the evaluation criteria for theory testing within the article have been refined since its publication. how philosophy, with an emphasis on epistemology affects testing of nursing theory and reflects on philosophical issues … the claims made by the author are … [end with your overall conclusion about the article]. |
The Summary Section
The summary section requires you to:
- Establish the key ideas/evidentiary or experimental claims made in the text
- List them from most to least significant
- Summarise each idea/evidentiary claim dispassionately as though you were providing a concise overview of the article for someone who has not read the article.
- Use the present tense for the author’s ideas even if they are published in the past (it is assumed they still believe their ideas). For research findings, use the past tense, e.g., found that…).
clarity by delineating the following seven evaluation criteria that distinguished the testing of nursing theory from other types of evaluation criteria in nursing research: 1)….2)…7) . is the distinction made between evaluation criteria and the testing of nursing theory and evaluation criteria for the overall quality of a research study. … made in the paper is that … from an experimental pilot project on … … [outline of main points and evidence continues]. |
The Critique Section
This section is the most important as it demonstrates your ability to critically assess the article. In writing this section:
- Take it for granted that published articles by world experts are never perfect. There are always limitations and caveats and ways that research can be improved. Research articles will often identify ‘limitations’ as part of the paper. You can expand on these limitations but you need to consider other areas in which the article might be flawed as part of your critical review.
- Devote a paragraph for each critical response if you have a lot to say; combine ideas together in one paragraph if they are closely related concerns.
- If your critique is more positive than negative, present the negative points first and the positive points last. End with a statement of why you agree with the article overall. If your critique is more negative than positive, do the opposite.
- If the article is equally balanced in terms of positive and negative points, you need to decide overall what your judgement is after weighing up the positive and negative points. Don’t ‘sit on the fence’.
- Consider including recommendations for how the text can be improved in terms of methodological improvements, a clearer research approach, the inclusion of additional theories or frameworks, or a more suitable experimental paradigm. (adapted from University of New South Wales, 2022)
; that is, the seven formative evaluation criteria need than that given in the paper. Chinn and Kramer (1999), Fawcett (1989), Melesis (1991) and Walker and Avant (1988) have all made contributions in terms of … and the author of these developments. , although Silva for choosing … evidence from other sources show that to all nursing theories in existence when the paper was written in 1986 (Jackson, 1986). the degree to which the results may have differed . with Silva’s article is that to the testing of nursing theory . But this of three other approaches to … This the …. [critique continues]. |
The Conclusion Section
This must be as brief and succinct as possible. In a critical review of 800 words, a conclusion might not even be necessary. If required, do the following:
- Remind the reader in a single sentence of your overall position on the article, positive or negative, and why you have made this judgement.
- End with a positive point about how the text has contributed to your understanding of the topic and the discipline as a whole. If it hasn’t done so, leave this sentence out.
This review Silva’s article …. /… / to our understanding of … because … [Despite this], to get clearer understanding of how nurses have systematically contributed to evaluation criteria for empirical testing of nursing theory. This bodes well for the advancement of nursing science and the future of nursing. |
- Australian National University. (2022). Critical review. https://www.anu.edu.au/students/academic-skills/writing-assessment/other-assessments/critical-review
- Davies, M. (2022). ‘Writing a critical review: A step by step guide’. In Study skills for international postgraduates. Bloomsbury. https://www.bloomsbury.com/au/study-skills-for-international-postgraduates-9781352012569/
- University of new South Wales. (2022). Structure of a critical review. https://www.student.unsw.edu.au/structure-critical-review
*These additional requirements are discipline-specific and not always required for critical reviews. NB: CASP checklists are critical appraisal tools to be used when reading research articles. See: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
For a downloadable helpsheet, see Critical reviews .
Quick links
- Apply online
- Course Finder
- Scholarships
- Indigenous matters
- my Student Centre
- Student Webmail
- FedUni Moodle
- ePortfolios
- Staff email
- Captive portal
- Change password
- General enquiries
- Staff directory
- Facilities and services
- Emergency and security
- ITS Service Desk portal
How to Write a Critical Essay
Hill Street Studios / Getty Images
- An Introduction to Punctuation
Olivia Valdes was the Associate Editorial Director for ThoughtCo. She worked with Dotdash Meredith from 2017 to 2021.
![what is a critical review essay what is a critical review essay](https://www.thoughtco.com/thmb/rVhZoN6hXkCa4LUbQ5EzqQiXcmY=/200x200/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(webp)/Olivia-Valdes_WEB1-1e405fc799d9474e9212215c4f21b141.jpg)
- B.A., American Studies, Yale University
A critical essay is a form of academic writing that analyzes, interprets, and/or evaluates a text. In a critical essay, an author makes a claim about how particular ideas or themes are conveyed in a text, then supports that claim with evidence from primary and/or secondary sources.
In casual conversation, we often associate the word "critical" with a negative perspective. However, in the context of a critical essay, the word "critical" simply means discerning and analytical. Critical essays analyze and evaluate the meaning and significance of a text, rather than making a judgment about its content or quality.
What Makes an Essay "Critical"?
Imagine you've just watched the movie "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory." If you were chatting with friends in the movie theater lobby, you might say something like, "Charlie was so lucky to find a Golden Ticket. That ticket changed his life." A friend might reply, "Yeah, but Willy Wonka shouldn't have let those raucous kids into his chocolate factory in the first place. They caused a big mess."
These comments make for an enjoyable conversation, but they do not belong in a critical essay. Why? Because they respond to (and pass judgment on) the raw content of the movie, rather than analyzing its themes or how the director conveyed those themes.
On the other hand, a critical essay about "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory" might take the following topic as its thesis: "In 'Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory,' director Mel Stuart intertwines money and morality through his depiction of children: the angelic appearance of Charlie Bucket, a good-hearted boy of modest means, is sharply contrasted against the physically grotesque portrayal of the wealthy, and thus immoral, children."
This thesis includes a claim about the themes of the film, what the director seems to be saying about those themes, and what techniques the director employs in order to communicate his message. In addition, this thesis is both supportable and disputable using evidence from the film itself, which means it's a strong central argument for a critical essay .
Characteristics of a Critical Essay
Critical essays are written across many academic disciplines and can have wide-ranging textual subjects: films, novels, poetry, video games, visual art, and more. However, despite their diverse subject matter, all critical essays share the following characteristics.
- Central claim . All critical essays contain a central claim about the text. This argument is typically expressed at the beginning of the essay in a thesis statement , then supported with evidence in each body paragraph. Some critical essays bolster their argument even further by including potential counterarguments, then using evidence to dispute them.
- Evidence . The central claim of a critical essay must be supported by evidence. In many critical essays, most of the evidence comes in the form of textual support: particular details from the text (dialogue, descriptions, word choice, structure, imagery, et cetera) that bolster the argument. Critical essays may also include evidence from secondary sources, often scholarly works that support or strengthen the main argument.
- Conclusion . After making a claim and supporting it with evidence, critical essays offer a succinct conclusion. The conclusion summarizes the trajectory of the essay's argument and emphasizes the essays' most important insights.
Tips for Writing a Critical Essay
Writing a critical essay requires rigorous analysis and a meticulous argument-building process. If you're struggling with a critical essay assignment, these tips will help you get started.
- Practice active reading strategies . These strategies for staying focused and retaining information will help you identify specific details in the text that will serve as evidence for your main argument. Active reading is an essential skill, especially if you're writing a critical essay for a literature class.
- Read example essays . If you're unfamiliar with critical essays as a form, writing one is going to be extremely challenging. Before you dive into the writing process, read a variety of published critical essays, paying careful attention to their structure and writing style. (As always, remember that paraphrasing an author's ideas without proper attribution is a form of plagiarism .)
- Resist the urge to summarize . Critical essays should consist of your own analysis and interpretation of a text, not a summary of the text in general. If you find yourself writing lengthy plot or character descriptions, pause and consider whether these summaries are in the service of your main argument or whether they are simply taking up space.
- Critical Analysis in Composition
- Writing About Literature: Ten Sample Topics for Comparison & Contrast Essays
- What Is a Critique in Composition?
- Definition and Examples of Analysis in Composition
- A Critical Analysis of George Orwell's 'A Hanging'
- What Are the Different Types and Characteristics of Essays?
- literary present (verbs)
- Book Report: Definition, Guidelines, and Advice
- personal statement (essay)
- Definition Examples of Collage Essays
- Definition and Examples of Evaluation Essays
- Composition Type: Problem-Solution Essays
- What Is Plagiarism?
- The Power and Pleasure of Metaphor
- Quotes About Close Reading
- What Is a Compelling Introduction?
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
Methodology
- How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates
How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates
Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.
What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .
There are five key steps to writing a literature review:
- Search for relevant literature
- Evaluate sources
- Identify themes, debates, and gaps
- Outline the structure
- Write your literature review
A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.
Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text
Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes
![what is a critical review essay upload-your-document-ai-proofreader](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/grammar-check.webp)
Table of contents
What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature review’s structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.
- Quick Run-through
- Step 1 & 2
When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:
- Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
- Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
- Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
- Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
- Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.
Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.
![what is a critical review essay Literature review guide](https://www.scribbr.nl/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Literature-review-guide.webp)
Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
- Academic style
- Vague sentences
- Style consistency
See an example
![what is a critical review essay what is a critical review essay](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/dissertation-proofreading-service.png)
Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.
- Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
- Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
- Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
- Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)
You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.
Download Word doc Download Google doc
Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .
If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .
Make a list of keywords
Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.
- Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
- Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
- Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth
Search for relevant sources
Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:
- Your university’s library catalogue
- Google Scholar
- Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
- Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
- EconLit (economics)
- Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)
You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.
Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.
You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.
For each publication, ask yourself:
- What question or problem is the author addressing?
- What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
- What are the key theories, models, and methods?
- Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
- What are the results and conclusions of the study?
- How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
- What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?
Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.
You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.
Take notes and cite your sources
As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.
It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.
Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.
To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:
- Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
- Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
- Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
- Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
- Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?
This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.
- Most research has focused on young women.
- There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
- But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your own research.
There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).
Chronological
The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.
Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.
If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.
For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.
Methodological
If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:
- Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
- Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
- Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources
Theoretical
A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.
You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.
Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.
The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.
Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.
As you write, you can follow these tips:
- Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
- Analyze and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers — add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
- Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
- Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts
In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.
When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !
This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.
Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.
Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint
If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
- Sampling methods
- Simple random sampling
- Stratified sampling
- Cluster sampling
- Likert scales
- Reproducibility
Statistics
- Null hypothesis
- Statistical power
- Probability distribution
- Effect size
- Poisson distribution
Research bias
- Optimism bias
- Cognitive bias
- Implicit bias
- Hawthorne effect
- Anchoring bias
- Explicit bias
A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .
It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.
There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:
- To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
- To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
- To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
- To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
- To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic
Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.
The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .
A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .
An annotated bibliography is a list of source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a paper .
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved September 2, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/
Is this article helpful?
Shona McCombes
Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, what is your plagiarism score.
![](http://ortec.site/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
COMMENTS
To write a good critical review, you will have to engage in the mental processes of analyzing (taking apart) the work-deciding what its major components are and determining how these parts (i.e., paragraphs, sections, or chapters) contribute to the work as a whole. Analyzing the work will help you focus on how and why the author makes certain ...
the article, taking the main points of each paragraph. The point of the diagram is to. show the relationships between the main points in the article. Ev en better you might. consider doing an ...
The critical review is a writing task that asks you to summarise and evaluate a text. The critical review can be of a book, a chapter, or a journal article. Writing the critical review usually requires you to read the selected text in detail and to read other related texts so you can present a fair and reasonable evaluation of the selected text.
s made. Critical vs DescriptiveA critical review or analysis is characterised by two main types of writing: (i) writing descriptively to summarise the particular arguments or concepts of a text, and (ii) writing critically to evaluate and/or an. lyse these arguments and concepts. It is necessary for a critical review to contain some descriptive ...
Summarising and paraphrasing are essential skills for academic writing and in particular, the critical review. To summarise means to reduce a text to its main points and its most important ideas. The length of your summary for a critical review should only be about one quarter to one third of the whole critical review. The best way to summarise.
Writing a Critical Review The advice in this brochure is a general guide only. We strongly recommend that you also follow your assignment instructions and seek clarification from your lecturer/tutor if needed. Purpose of a critical review The critical review is a writing task that asks you to summarise and evaluate a text. The critical review can
A short critical review should have a brief introduction, simply providing the subject of the research and the author, and outlining the structure you will be using. The simplest way to structure a critical review is to write a paragraph or two about each section of the study in turn. Within your discussion of
A critical review is a description and evaluation of a source, usually a journal article or book. It moves beyond a summary to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the source and to comment on the quality of the source as a whole. Do not be confused by the term "critical": it does not mean that you only look at the negative aspects of ...
A critical review is a critical evaluation of a document (or book or chapter or article). It is not just a summary of the contents. You are expected to read, make judgments about the document and justify these judgments by using the criteria given to you by your lecturer or indicated in the theory. If you have been given criteria to undertake ...
Critical evaluation necessitates understanding and analysing the text and then evaluating according to various criteria. The following is a list of criteria that can be referred to when reviewing academic texts and included in your critical commentary. • Writing and structure of the article or book. (e.g the style and expression)
A critical review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of an item's ideas and content. It provides description, analysis and interpretation that assess the item's value. It's an exercise that can be carried out on many different types of writing, but is most often carried out on a report, a book or a journal article.
A critical review is usually written in an essay structure. The key elements of an essay are the argument and the reasoning. The argument is what you're trying to convince the reader about. In a critical review, you are making an argument about the text you are reviewing, e.g. its main contribution, its value for understanding a topic.
A critical review is not just a summary. It is an evaluation of what an author has said about a topic. It is critical in the sense that it is a thoughtful consideration of the validity and accuracy of the author's claims; considers the benefits and limitations of the author's point of view; and identifies other valid points of view (Monash ...
To assert the article's practical and theoretical significance. In general, the conclusion of your critical review should include. A restatement of your overall opinion. A summary of the key strengths and weaknesses of the research that support your overall opinion of the source. An evaluation of the significance or success of the research.
A critical analysis essay requires you to analyze a subject and determine its meaning, backing it with evidence and ideas of your own. We've got examples to help you write one.
Writing a Critical Review You are probably familiar with the review genre such as film reviews or book reviews. A critical review is similar, as it is based on a close and detailed reading and evaluation of a text or comparison of multiple texts on the same topic. The type of texts you may be asked to review could include books, articles, reports,
How to Write a Critical Analysis Essay. Written by MasterClass. Last updated: Jun 7, 2021 • 3 min read. Critical analysis essays can be a daunting form of academic writing, but crafting a good critical analysis paper can be straightforward if you have the right approach.
Critical Reviews (Summary and Critique) A Critical Review (also called a 'Summary and Critique') is similar to a Annotated Bibliography in that it is a written response to a single text. This text can be a peer-reviewed journal article, a book chapter, or a book. A critical review is usually much longer than an annotated bibliography (800 ...
A review is a critical essay evaluating the merits of an academic work. Its purpose is not to prove that you read the book—which is understood as a given—but to show that you can think critically about what you've read. You can see examples of reviews in virtually any historical journal, and these may help you to write your ...
A critical essay is a form of academic writing that analyzes, interprets, and/or evaluates a text. In a critical essay, an author makes a claim about how particular ideas or themes are conveyed in a text, then supports that claim with evidence from primary and/or secondary sources. In casual conversation, we often associate the word "critical ...
Writing a Critical Review The advice in this brochure is a general guide only. We strongly recommend that you also follow your assignment instructions and seek clarification from your lecturer/tutor if needed. Purpose of a Critical Review The critical review is a writing task that asks you to summarise and evaluate a text. The critical review ...
Learning how to write a critical analysis essay is an important skill for college students. You'll need to learn how to critique what you read and how to wri...
Examples of literature reviews. Step 1 - Search for relevant literature. Step 2 - Evaluate and select sources. Step 3 - Identify themes, debates, and gaps. Step 4 - Outline your literature review's structure. Step 5 - Write your literature review.