(“kinesiology” OR “physical education” OR “physical activit*” OR “sport*”)
To answer the research questions, we first obtained hit counts for our search term combinations ( Table 1 ), employing a descriptive quantitative analysis approach [ 202 , 203 ]. We obtained the abstracts, as part of downloading the citations obtained through Scopus and EBSCO-Host, using the Endnote 9 software. We removed duplicates within the Endnote 9 software and exported the remaining abstracts, as a Word file, from the Endnote 9 software. We then uploaded the Word file with the abstracts into the qualitative analysis software ATLAS.Ti 9™ for directed qualitative content analysis [ 202 , 203 , 204 , 205 ] of the data focusing on the research questions, meaning the abstracts had to cover EDI as a policy framework and not just engage with individual EDI terms. Both authors coded the abstracts to see which fit the inclusion criterium, and the full text articles of these abstracts were downloaded and uploaded into ATLAS.Ti 9™. We used a directed content analysis to add knowledge about the phenomenon of EDI and areas of kinesiology, physical education, physical activity, and sports that benefit from further description [ 202 ]. As to the coding procedure, beyond having judged the relevance of the abstracts for downloading the full texts, we followed a procedure we used before [ 201 ], as outlined by others [ 202 , 205 , 206 ].
As to trustworthiness measures [ 207 , 208 , 209 ], the few differences in the analysis of the qualitative data were discussed and resolved between the authors (peer debriefing) [ 209 ]. Confirmability was achieved by using the audit trail, employing the memo and coding functions within ATLAS.Ti 9™ software. As for transferability, we provided all the information needed, so that others can decide whether to apply our study design to other sources or change design aspects, such as different keywords.
The search strategies generated 26 abstracts, of which 18 were deemed to have relevant content. The full texts of the 18 relevant abstracts were downloaded and thematically analyzed ( Figure 1 ).
Flow chart of the selection of academic full texts for qualitative analysis.
We present the themes in the downloaded full text articles in three sections:
We separated the findings further by the following four areas: physical education, sport, physical activity, and kinesiology.
Furthermore, we separate the findings into the four common themes we found: (a) EDI recommendation/EDI needs, (b) EDI curriculum and teacher/educator/mentor role in EDI, (c) EDI literacy/EDI narrative, and, lastly, (d) EDI study results.
Finally, we separated the results according to which EDI group they looked at. If a source did not specifically discuss equity deserving groups, it was labelled as “no group”.
In each of the results sections, we first provide the frequency counts for the presence of themes we found. We only list where there was at least one hit for the theme. The themes that had 0 results are not listed in the tables.
Within the academic/educational setting theme, the following themes returned no results and, as such, are neither listed in Table 2 and Table 3 nor reflected in the sub-headers:
Frequency of themes related to EDI and Physical education in an academic/educational setting.
Area of Coverage | Degree of Coverage | EDI-Related Theme | EDI-Related Equity Deserving Groups Mentioned | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Academic/educational Setting | Physical Education | EDI recommendation/EDI needs | Women | 0 |
Disabled People | 1 | |||
LGBTQ2S+ | 0 | |||
Racialized Minorities | 3 | |||
Indigenous Peoples | 0 | |||
No group | 8 | |||
EDI Curriculum and Educators and Mentors role in EDI | Women | 0 | ||
Disabled People | 0 | |||
LGBTQ2S+ | 0 | |||
Racialized Minorities | 1 | |||
Indigenous Peoples | 0 | |||
No group | 8 | |||
EDI Literacy/EDI Narrative | Women | 0 | ||
Disabled People | 0 | |||
LGBTQ2S+ | 0 | |||
Racialized Minorities | 0 | |||
Indigenous Peoples | 0 | |||
No group | 2 |
Frequency of themes related to EDI and sports in an academic/educational setting.
Area of Coverage | Degree of Coverage | EDI-Related Theme | EDI-Related Equity Deserving Groups Mentioned | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Academic/educational Setting | Sports | EDI recommendation/EDI needs | Women | 0 |
Disabled People | 0 | |||
LGBTQ2S+ | 0 | |||
Racialized Minorities | 0 | |||
Indigenous Peoples | 0 | |||
No group | 3 | |||
EDI literacy/EDI narrative | Women | 0 | ||
Disabled People | 0 | |||
LGBTQ2S+ | 0 | |||
Racialized Minorities | 0 | |||
Indigenous Peoples | 0 | |||
No group | 1 | |||
EDI study result | Women | 2 | ||
Disabled People | 1 | |||
LGBTQ2S+ | 1 | |||
Racialized Minorities | 3 | |||
Indigenous Peoples | 0 | |||
No groups | 3 |
Edi recommendation/edi needs.
There were twelve findings, in a total of five sources, that discussed EDI recommendations/EDI needs, in the context of physical education in an academic setting. Out of the twelve findings, one of them discussed persons with disabilities, three of them discussed ethnic groups, and eight of them did not cover any specific EDI group.
The EDI recommendation related to persons with disability(s) in physical education settings was that regular contact with non-disabled children in physical education classes aids in the inclusion of those with disabilities in society [ 210 ]. The EDI recommendation related to ethnic groups discussed that, if students limit their interactions with the same or similar cultural backgrounds in the physical education class, it is then reflected in the student’s behavior and interactions in society [ 210 ]. This statement essentially emphasizes that it is important that students do not limit their interactions with other students of different cultural backgrounds and highlights that, if this type of behavior is happening within the classroom, it is very likely that it will also occur outside of the classroom [ 210 ]. Another recommendation that looked at including ethnic groups was that, in order to make education more accessible, we should look at multilingual or cultural resources that can engage more communities and, as a result, have more participants engaging in learning [ 211 ]. In addition, another recommendation for the inclusion of ethnic groups discussed the importance of culturally sensitive and inclusive pedagogy in the classroom [ 210 ]. Other recommendations that discussed physical education in an academic setting did not address a specific group covered by the EDI framework but discussed other EDI recommendations and the need for EDI in these settings. Firstly, the need for EDI was addressed through the importance of inclusive education. Specifically, it is noted that inclusive education means that all learners, no matter who, should have access to mainstream education, and inclusive education should benefit all learners [ 211 ]. A recommendation for inclusive learning stated that there are many resources available online for learning that can aid education to be more inclusive [ 211 ]. Recommendations for EDI and the need for EDI was also looked at, specifically in the physical education classroom and curriculum. For example, a recommendation emphasized the importance of establishing an inclusive classroom environment, where all students feel like they are included and belong in the classroom [ 210 ]. Another major recommendation was the need for educational curricula to cover EDI topics, so students could be educated on the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion [ 212 ]. To keep those creating curricula accountable, a recommendation was put forward that, if curricula fail to implement EDI frameworks, there should be consequences for such actions [ 213 ]. The need for EDI was also addressed outside of the classroom, specifically in certain research journals [ 214 ]. This study looked at one journal, i.e., The Recreational Sports Journal , and found that EDI was not discussed in a meaningful way during the time period of their study; it is very important to address this void and publish more papers that cover EDI topics [ 214 ]. It was recommended in this paper that the editor-in-chief and editorial board of the journal should generate a call for papers that are focused on EDI issues, as well as designate research funding to the topic of EDI [ 214 ].
There were nine findings, in a total of three sources, that discussed EDI curricula and the teachers/educator/mentor role in EDI, in the context of physical education in an academic setting. Out of the nine findings, one of them discussed ethnic groups and the other eight covered no specific EDI group. In terms of ethnic groups, it was discussed that taking the initiative to build EDI curricula brings the opportunity to include more culturally responsive and cultural enrichment pedagogy [ 211 ]. The following findings did not discuss a specific EDI group but did cover the idea of an EDI curriculum and educators and mentors role in EDI. It was discussed that educators and mentors must make sure that everyone feels welcome, supported, and valued in their space, so students can achieve their goals and grow their talents [ 211 ]. Understanding the value that physical education has, in terms of building relationships across different groups of people, was addressed [ 210 ]. The idea that educators must reflect on their teaching styles and activities within the physical education classroom was highlighted [ 215 ]; in order to do so, it was said that this requires a deep understanding of the barriers and societal issues that minority groups face [ 210 ]. There was further emphasis on the fact that it is important that educators also teach for social cohesion and, when doing so, they must be careful to be aware of dominant versus minority groups and teach accordingly [ 210 ]. Overall, the idea that teachers must be aware of the impact that implementing EDI-based curricula can have for the children outside of the classroom, as well as the role they play in achieving positive outcomes, has been noted as crucial.
There were three findings, out of a total of one source, that discussed EDI recommendation/EDI needs, in the context of sports in an academic setting. Out of those three findings, none of them covered a specific EDI group. The source was a statement that was put out by the Journal of Sport Rehabilitation for their commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion [ 216 ]. In the statement, they addressed the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion in research and provided some future recommendations and goals for their own journal [ 216 ]. They started off by openly embracing the concept of EDI and said that they want to maintain a culture that embraces EDI within their journal [ 216 ]. They further went on to say that they want to work actively to promote change through purposeful EDI initiatives, as well as publish more diverse research that can be translatable to a more patient diverse population [ 216 ].
The following source discusses reflections that occurred at EDI conferences [ 217 ]. This source did not specifically cover physical education, physical activity, sports, or kinesiology, but they did take the reflections mentioned in the conferences and mentioned them in the context of sports; therefore, we categorized these findings in this section. There are four findings in the one source that discussed EDI literacy and narratives in an academic setting, specifically research conferences. None of these findings discussed a specific EDI group. This source first started off by highlighting that one of the barriers to EDI literacy is connected to the fact that the EDI research that is broadcasted and discussed during conferences is not easily accessible for the vast majority of people who do not get invited to conferences; therefore, it is important that we have literature for people to learn about EDI through credible sources [ 217 ]. There was further discussion on the idea that statistics cannot represent the actual stories that are behind individual answers, and its stories can show us the intersectionality in a clear way [ 217 ]. In addition, it was said, in relation to EDI literacy, that positive stories can often deflect from the negative stories that make people uncomfortable; therefore, this can affect the EDI narrative [ 217 ]. With that in mind, it was said that it is important that we provide appreciative inquiry and not critical inquiry when we are analyzing negative stories relating to EDI [ 217 ].
There were seven findings, out of a total of two sources, that discussed EDI study results, in the context of sports in an academic setting. One of the sources covered all EDI groups, whereas the other source did not cover any EDI groups. The first source was a content analysis of equity, diversity, and inclusion in the Recreational Sports Journal [ 214 ], performed for the years of 2005 to 2019. The study results revealed that reporting participants gender was the only variable that showed improvement from the pre-to-post-EDI commission era [ 214 ]. In this content analysis, it was also highlighted that the most to least discussed issues in EDI research was in order from gender, race and ethnicity, social class, nationality issue, sexual orientation issue, disability issue, and non-traditional student issues [ 214 ]. It is important to take note that, out of the EDI groups we are looking at, the content analysis clearly highlighted that disability issues were the least discussed in EDI research. It was highlighted in another statement that gender was the most addressed cultural diversity issue, and there is little attention to topics, such as disability, nationality, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, or social class [ 214 ]. This content analysis also revealed that, out of the 200 Recreational Sports Journal articles that were analyzed, 18% addressed at least one equity diversity and/or inclusion issues [ 214 ]. Furthermore, it was also revealed that EDI issues were addressed in less than 20% of the articles in the journal [ 214 ]. The second source looked at the development of a model of diversity, equity, and inclusion for support volunteers [ 218 ]. In this source, it was revealed that sports volunteers experience a lack of inclusion on many levels and microaggressions [ 218 ]. It was specifically discussed that there is limited research that critically examines the experience of volunteers that belong to traditionally underrepresented populations [ 218 ].
Within the non-academic setting theme, the following returned no results and, as such, are neither listed in Table 4 and Table 5 nor reflected in the sub-headers:
Frequency of themes related to EDI and physical activity in a non-academic setting.
Area of Coverage | Degree of Coverage | EDI-Related Theme | EDI-Related Equity Deserving Groups Mentioned | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Non-academic setting | Physical activity | EDI recommendation/EDI needs | Women | 0 |
Disabled People | 0 | |||
LGBTQ2S+ | 0 | |||
Racialized Minorities | 0 | |||
Indigenous Peoples | 0 | |||
No group | 1 |
Frequency of themes related to EDI and sports in a non-academic setting.
Area of Coverage | Degree of Coverage | EDI-Related Theme | EDI-Related Equity Deserving Groups Mentioned | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Non-academic setting | Sports | EDI recommendation/EDI needs | Women | 1 |
Disabled people | 0 | |||
LGBTQ2S+ | 0 | |||
Racialized Minorities | 3 | |||
Indigenous Peoples | 0 | |||
No group | 2 | |||
EDI study result | Women | 3 | ||
Disabled People | 0 | |||
LGBTQ2S+ | 4 | |||
Racialized Minorities | 2 | |||
Indigenous Peoples | 0 | |||
No groups | 0 |
There was one finding, through one source, that discussed EDI recommendations/EDI needs in the context of physical activity in a non-academic setting. This EDI recommendation/EDI need did not cover any specific EDI group. It was discussed that there is an “urgent need” to address EDI within intramural and recreational sports [ 214 ]. This recommendation and expression for the need of EDI also covers the topic of sports; however, we also added it in the physical activity section because intramural and recreational sports are commonly a form of leisure time physical activity and usually do not include those who play sports professionally.
There were five findings, in a total of four sources, that discussed EDI recommendations/EDI needs in the context of sport in a non-academic setting. Out of those five findings, one discussed women and ethnic groups, one discussed ethnic groups, and two discussed no EDI groups. The EDI recommendation and need to promote racial EDI within black women’s football in Brazil were highlighted [ 219 ]. This recommendation emphasized the importance of EDI, in the context of women, as well as ethnic groups. The EDI recommendation that was specific to ethnic minorities was that, without intentional recognition and efforts towards addressing racial disparities, we will not see meaningful progress, in terms of the leadership efforts, for EDI and, in some cases, could even result in more damage, if we do not address racial disparities [ 213 ]. This paper was specific to college sports and sport leadership; however, the paper applied this statement generally and, therefore, is categorized under the non-academic section. In terms of general sports in a non-academic setting, it was said that there is an urgent need to start addressing EDI-related audiences, issues, and topics within the field of intramural and recreational sports [ 214 ]. Furthermore, it was recommended that national governing bodies should consider implementing mentorship programs, take steps to limit the influence of social connections on advancement decisions, reduce barriers to participation, and provide training to reduce the presence of microaggressions and unconscious bias within sport [ 218 ]. Lastly, the need for EDI was highlighted by saying that an EDI framework within sport organizations is necessary for success of that sport organization [ 218 ].
There were eight findings, out of a total of three sources, that presented EDI study results in the context of support in a non-academic setting. Out of the eight findings, four discussed LGBTQIA+ topics, two discussed women, one discussed ethnic groups, and one discussed both women and ethnic groups. One EDI study result discussing LGBTQIA+ was that athletes have a fear of disclosing their sexuality or sexual orientation, in fear of discrimination from the sports industry [ 220 ]. Because of this, players will not disclose their non-heterosexual orientation, in order to avoid homophobic discrimination from their fans, agents, the media, and, lastly, their employers [ 220 ]. Furthermore, there was discussion on the question as to whether the equity law, as well as the law on positive action, are enough to promote the equality of treatment and opportunity, when it comes to the employment of LGBTQIA+ elite sport professionals, specifically football players [ 220 ]. Lastly, it was said that the acknowledgement of the presence and prevalence of homophobia in football is a more recent phenomenon [ 220 ]. An EDI study result highlighted that female representation and recognition in sports have yet to catch up to that of their male counterparts [ 221 ]. Furthermore, there is limited coverage that is specific to women’s sports; when women are presented as a topic, they are faced with arbitrary issues, such as femininity and sexuality [ 221 ]. Specific to ethnic groups, a EDI study result highlighted that, even though many professional athletes are people of color, those who want to be employed as coaches and managers are still facing discrimination within sport [ 220 ]. One of the EDI study results that covered both ethnic groups and women was that there is white male advantage in sports [ 217 ].
Within the university setting theme, the following returned no results and, as such, are neither listed in Table 6 and Table 7 nor reflected in the sub-headers:
Frequency of themes related to EDI and sports in a university setting.
Area of Coverage | Degree of Coverage | EDI-Related Theme | EDI-Related Equity Deserving Groups Mentioned | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
University Setting | Sports | EDI recommendation/EDI needs | Women | 0 |
Disabled people | 0 | |||
LGBTQ2S+ | 0 | |||
Racialized Minorities | 0 | |||
Indigenous Peoples | 0 | |||
No group | 4 |
Frequency of themes related to EDI and kinesiology in a university setting.
Area of Coverage | Degree of Coverage | EDI-Related Theme | EDI-Related Equity Deserving Groups Mentioned | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
University Settings | Kinesiology | EDI recommendation/EDI needs | Women | 0 |
Disabled People | 0 | |||
LGBTQ2S+ | 0 | |||
Racialized Minorities | 0 | |||
Indigenous Peoples | 0 | |||
No groups | 1 |
There were four findings, in a total of two sources, that discussed EDI recommendation/EDI needs in the context of sport in a university setting. Out of those four findings, none of them discussed a specific EDI group. One of the findings presented the recommendation that, for the future of college recreational sports programs, those programs have a responsibility to address the needs of the changing demographic interests, as well as the diverse students on campus [ 214 ]. This source also addressed that, as there is growing diversity on college campuses, the future of college campuses must prioritize EDI [ 214 ]. Furthermore, it was recommended that the National Collegiate Athletic Association should have penalties in place for institutions that fail to implement EDI initiatives or for those that do not have any EDI initiatives in place [ 222 ]. In addition, recommendations around EDI frameworks and leadership strategies were also presented specifically by addressing that culturally responsive leadership strategies are important for achieving EDI in college sports [ 222 ].
The recommendation in this one source addressed that the kinesiology program design can use student narratives and experiences to make the shift from neutral documents and pedagogy to ones that expose and work towards dismantling Eurocentricity within the field of study [ 87 ].
The objective of this study was to ascertain to what extent (and how) the academic literature focusing on sports, kinesiology, physical education, and physical activity engages with the various EDI phrases and frameworks, as well as which of the marginalized groups covered under EDI are mentioned in the literature covered.
We found only 18 relevant hits with all our search strategies, whereby the EDI frameworks were not at all found. Only ‘sport*’ generated any hits related to EDI phrases; the other three fields did not. The majority of our findings were based on the presence of all the individual EDI terms, but not as phrases; within these sources, the term “sport*” was the most linked to EDI, with much less physical activity or physical education and even less kinesiology. On top, we found a very low to no coverage of marginalized groups normally linked to EDI, namely racialized minorities (12), women (6), LGBTQ2S+ (5), disabled people (2), and Indigenous peoples (0), within the already low coverage of EDI.
Altogether, our findings suggest a huge gap in the academic inquiry and huge opportunities for research on EDI within sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology by themselves, but also in collaborations with many other fields and groups, such as disability studies and other identity group studies, social justice studies, education, media studies, global south focused studies, sustainability studies, socially disadvantaged groups, practitioners, and policy makers. Given that ableism is employed in the academic literature covering sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology, we especially see opportunities for sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology academic efforts to use the ableism lens to enrich the EDI discourses. For the remainder of the section, we discuss the problems of our findings, using as lenses: (a) the academic literature related to physical education, sport, physical activity, and kinesiology, individually covering the terms equity, equality, inclusion, and diversity; (b) the premise of the EDI frameworks and phrases, in general, as well as in the context of disabled people; and (c) ableism experienced by disabled people, but also beyond.
Efforts performed under the EDI frameworks and EDI policy terms are envisioned to lead to systemic positive change for students, academic staff, and non-academic staff in universities, as a workplace, in general, but also in the research and education reality in universities [ 1 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. To quote from the Canadian EDI framework DIMENSIONS: Equity, diversity, and inclusion: “Canada invites you to take part in a post-secondary transformation to increase equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) and help drive deeper cultural change within the research ecosystem” [ 35 ] and “The Dimensions program addresses obstacles faced by, but not limited to, women, Indigenous Peoples, persons with disabilities, members of visible minorities/racialized groups, and members of LGBTQ2+ communities” [ 35 ].
Given this sweeping mandate for positive systemic and cultural changes EDI actions are to engender, much more should have been found in our searches that link sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology to EDI policy frameworks and phrases with particular emphasis on the EDI targeted groups. However, our findings are not surprising, as the EDI frameworks and phrases are rarely visible in other contexts either, such as disabled people, in general [ 1 ]. However, given the very focus of sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology, namely their narratives around the ability of the body and social role of sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology, we suggest they are uniquely situated to contribute and critically analyze EDI discourses, including the ability premises of EDI discourses. Furthermore, disabled students, graduate and undergraduate, are uniquely situated to contribute to this analysis, but there are problems to achieve that goal for disabled students on the undergraduate and graduate levels [ 1 , 223 , 224 ].
In sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology, the individual terms of equity, equality, diversity, and inclusion are discussed, in the context of the EDI groups of gender, race, LGBTQ2S+ [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 ], and Indigenous people [ 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 115 , 116 , 117 ], including using an intersectionality lens [ 52 , 53 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 ]. Individual EDI terms are also discussed in sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology, in the context of disabled people [ 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 149 ], whereby the very meaning of the individual terms, such as diversity and inclusion, are debated [ 113 , 151 ]. All these documents suggest that there could, and should, have been much more coverage of the EDI phrases and frameworks than we found. Our findings are another example of a disconnect between policy terms, frameworks, and existing academic literature. Our findings also suggests that the very conceptual thinking around EDI and sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology might be underdeveloped. Using individual terms, such as equity, equality, diversity, and inclusion, is much easier than using a framework that uses them together (equity, diversity, and inclusion; equality, diversity, and inclusion). Indeed, discussions are ongoing how to fill the individual terms with meaning in the EDI policy frameworks, and more terms are added to these phrases, such as belonging, justice, dignity, accessibility, accountability, and decolonization [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], suggesting that the initial EDI phrases did not lead to the desired EDI changes anticipated. These ongoing discussions suggest an opening for the academic engagement with the EDI arena in the university setting by sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology. Then the problems and actions flagged as needed in the academic literature covering sport, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology, as well as the individual EDI terms, are reasons, by themselves, that there could (and should) be more academic engagement of sport, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology with the EDI phrases and frameworks, in order to generate data on how to make them useful. The existing literature suggests the possibilities of interdisciplinary collaborations on EDI between sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology, as well as other academic fields, where problems of marginalized groups, in the context of sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology, are noted, such as media studies [ 70 , 71 , 72 ], departments and programs that cover the global south [ 69 ], teacher education (including physical education teachers) [ 113 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 , 149 , 150 , 151 ], and fields covering health, environmental design, and urban design [ 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 ]. EDI engagement by sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology could be used to engage with many social problems in the community linked to sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology, as well as problems flagged within university settings of sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology, such as group cohesion [ 73 , 74 ], identity formation [ 75 ], need for changing curricula [ 88 , 96 , 97 ], need for diversifying students and faculty [ 97 , 98 ], and need for questioning oppressive discourses and privileges [ 152 ].
Ableism is a term coined by disabled activists and academics to flag the cultural reality of ability-based expectations, judgments, norms, and conflicts [ 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 ]. Ableism is also used as a conceptual framework, to call out ability-based discriminations against disabled people within the kinesiology, sports, physical education, and physical education literature [ 91 , 149 , 151 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 ]. Ableism is seen as one reason for the invisibility of disabled people and their problems in many subject topics and degrees [ 196 ], and it is argued that it is critical to understand “ableism and how ableistic ideology informs sporting theory, sport science and sport management” [ 197 ] (p. 5), and a “different ability curriculum, which destabilises notions of normativity and challenges the status quo regarding ability” is needed [ 194 ] (p. 518). As such, the problems indicated in sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology, under the concept of ableism, suggest the need for critical evaluation of EDI frameworks and policies developed under EDI phrases that are applied to disabled people, which sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology are well situated to provide. However, ableism is more useful.
The cultural reality of ableism is intersectional [ 178 , 179 , 180 , 181 ]. The intersectionality of experiencing different forms of isms, including ableism and problematic ability, linked prejudices, perceptions, microaggression, discrimination, language, and attitudes toward disabled people and others are highlighted in the education of students and curricula in sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology [ 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 191 , 193 ]. It is argued that experiences and discourses around sport often favor and internalize ableism [ 183 , 187 , 190 ]. However, the very cultural reality of ableism goes beyond being part of a list of isms. Ableism is used to enable other negative isms, such as sexism, racism, classism, and ageism, that have, at their core, ability judgments [ 153 , 154 , 182 ]. Masculinity and supercrip identities, mentioned in [ 183 ], are not just internalized identities similar to the ableism identity mentioned in [ 183 ]; abilities are used to justify masculinity by itself, indeed masculinity is seen as an essential ability and a lack of such is used to question certain social groups [ 182 ]. Ableism is flagged as a useful analytical perspective in sports pedagogy to reflect on its discriminatory and exclusionary potential [ 149 ]; there are there are competing ability-related narratives [ 149 ]. Ableism could be used by sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology as a conceptual framework to engage with all EDI covered groups, because all EDI groups are judged based on abilities (body-derived, culture-derived). We think sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology are uniquely positioned to engage with, and enrich, the discussions around the cultural intersectional reality of ability-based expectations, judgments, norms, and conflicts, in conjunction with EDI frameworks and policy work. Sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology can make use of many ability concepts, such as internalized ableism [ 168 ], ability privilege [ 225 ], ability security (one is able to live a decent life with whatever set of abilities one has), ability identity security (to be able to be at ease with ones abilities), and ability inequity, an unjust or unfair (a) “distribution of access to and protection from abilities generated through human interventions” or (b) “judgment of abilities intrinsic to biological structures such as the human body” [ 156 , 177 ] to enrich the EDI discussions. Sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology can enrich the ability-based EDI discussions, as well, by engaging with the area of human body ability enhancements obtained through, for example, drugs, genetic and cybernetic interventions, the linked consequences of ability creeps (expecting more and more abilities of the human body; physical, mental and cognitive), and ability obsolescence [ 226 ].
The search was limited to two academic databases and English language literature. As such, the findings are not to be generalized to the whole academic literature, non-academic literature, or non-English literature. These findings, however, allow conclusions to be made, within the parameters of the searches.
The low hits we obtained in our scoping review suggests a gap in academic inquiry around EDI and sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology. Many research projects could evaluate the existing EDI frameworks and EDI phrases, through the lens of sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology. One could answer the following research questions: What do the EDI phrases mean for sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology? Which phrases are the most suitable for sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology? Do words have to be added to the phrases? Why has the academic literature in sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology not engaged with the phrases and frameworks yet? What are the societal consequences of sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology not generating academic data and engaging with the EDI frameworks and phrases? Answers to these questions can be obtained conceptually for sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology, with surveys and interviews covering EDI-deserving groups on the level of students, academic staff, and non-academic staff. This research can engage with workplace climate, education, and research realities. For example, in a 2019 Statistics Canada survey, it is stated that 35% of disabled university professors, instructors, teachers, or researchers “experienced unfair treatment or discrimination in the past 12 months”, and 47% saw themselves “subjected to at least one type of harassment in the past 12 months” [ 227 ]. Within this survey, the numbers for disabled university professors, instructors, teachers, or researchers are the highest of all groups listed [ 227 ]. The respective numbers for “no self-reported disability” were 15.4% and 26.0%; “female gender” were 23.0% and 34.0%; “visible minorities” were 23.0% and 28.0%; and “indigenous identity” were 30.0% and 37.0%” [ 1 ] (p. 5). Such a reality must impact the implementation of positive systemic and cultural EDI changes in universities. One could generate numbers specific for sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology activities at universities. We also suggest that sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology activities at universities are uniquely situated to perform conceptual and empirical work on linking ableism to EDI in their areas and beyond. We suggest that sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology all focus on the body, and the body is the primary source of ability judgments. These judgments are then used to enable some groups/individuals over others or disable some groups/individuals. We see sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology to be uniquely situated to engage with the linkage of body ability judgments and non-body linked abilities, such as competitiveness, productivity, or the ability to have a good life [ 228 ]. We also see that sports, physical education, physical activity, and kinesiology uniquely positioned to generate and run ability-based surveys that could enrich EDI discourses.
Conceptualization, G.W. and K.A.; methodology, G.W. and K.A.; formal analysis, K.A. and G.W.; investigation, K.A. and G.W.; writing—original draft preparation, K.A. and G.W.; writing—review and editing, G.W. and K.A.; supervision, G.W.; project administration, G.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research received no external funding.
Not applicable.
Data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
1559 Accesses
This chapter covers all aspects of diversity, equity, and inclusion as it relates to sport organizations. There are four major aspects of diversity to consider: ethical, legal, economic, and consumer/participant. First, understanding what diversity and inclusion are provides the foundation for building a better sport organization. The research in sport management indicates diversity and inclusion can be beneficial to the organization. Practical steps and considerations for improving diversity and inclusion in sport organizations are discussed in this chapter. This includes diversity statements, recruitment strategies, hiring process issues, programming, and organizational structure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Kotkin, J. (August, 2010). The Changing Demographics of America. Smithsonian Magazine . Retrieved from: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/the-changing-demographics-of-america-538284/ .
Olushola-Ogunrinde, J., & Carter-Francique, A. R. (2020). Beyond the Xs and Os. In (Eds. Bradbury, S., Lusted, J., & van Sterkenburg, J.) ‘Race’, Ethnicity and Racism in Sports Coaching . London: Routledge.
Proxmire, D. (December, 2008). Coaching Diversity: The Rooney Rule, Its Application and Ideas for Expansion. American Constitution Society for Law and Policy . Retrieved from: https://www.acslaw.org/wp-content/uploads/old-uploads/originals/documents/Proxmire_Issue_Brief.pdf .
Cooper, J. N., Newton, A. C., Klein, M., & Jolly, S. (2020). A Call for Culturally Responsive Transformational Leadership in College Sport: An Anti-ism Approach for Achieving Equity and Inclusion. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, 65, 1–17.
Cunningham, G. B., & Melton, E. N. (2011). The benefits of sexual orientation diversity in sport organizations. Journal of Homosexuality, 58 (5), 647–663.
Loop, P. & DeNicola, P (Feb., 2019). You’ve Committed to Increasing Gender Diversity on Your Board. Here’s How to Make it Happen. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2019/02/youve-committed-to-increasing-gender-diversity-on-your-board-heres-how-to-make-it-happen .
Walker, N. A., & Melton, E. N. (2015). The tipping point: The intersection of race, gender, and sexual orientation in intercollegiate sports. Journal of Sport Management, 29 (3), 257–271.
McDowell, J., & Carter-Francique, A. (2017). An intersectional analysis of the workplace experiences of African American female athletic directors. Sex Roles, 77 (5–6), 393–408.
Leblanc, D. (April, 2020) Ottawa adding new census questions on gender, Indigenous, linguistic, and ethnic minorities. The Globe and Mail . Retrieved from: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-ottawa-adding-new-census-questions-on-gender-indigenous-canadians/ .
Damian, R. I., Spengler, M., Sutu, A., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117 (3), 674
Fink, J. S., Pastore, D. L., & Riemer, H. A. (2001). Do differences make a difference? Managing diversity in Division IA intercollegiate athletics. Journal of Sport Management, 15 (1), 10–50.
Singer, J. N., & Cunningham, G. B. (2018). A collective case study of African American male athletic directors’ leadership approaches to diversity in college sport. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 11 (2), 269–297.
Mohr, T. S. (August, 2014). Why women don’t apply for jobs unless they’re 100% qualified. Harvard Business Review . Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2014/08/why-women-dont-apply-for-jobs-unless-theyre-100-qualified .
Peterson, L. (March, 2018). Why aren’t more black kids going pro in esports? The Undefeated . Retrieved from: https://theundefeated.com/features/why-arent-more-black-kids-going-pro-in-esports/ .
Kim, J. (November, 2017). How to Design Original, Impactful Diversity and Inclusion Programming. Presented at the Lever Talent Innovation Summit. Retrieved from: https://www.jennifer.kim/inclusion .
Agyemang, K., & DeLorme, J. (2010). Examining the Dearth of Black Head Coaches at the NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision Level: A Critical Race Theory and Social Dominance Theory Analysis. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics , 3, 35–52.
Authors and affiliations.
Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA
Christopher R. Barnhill
East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA
Natalie L. Smith
University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO, USA
Brent D. Oja
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Christopher R. Barnhill .
(MP3 6711 kb)
Rights and permissions.
Reprints and permissions
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Barnhill, C.R., Smith, N.L., Oja, B.D. (2021). Diversity in Sport Organizations. In: Organizational Behavior in Sport Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67612-4_3
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67612-4_3
Published : 10 April 2021
Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN : 978-3-030-67611-7
Online ISBN : 978-3-030-67612-4
eBook Packages : Business and Management Business and Management (R0)
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Policies and ethics
Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.
For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here .
Loading metrics
Open Access
Peer-reviewed
Research Article
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
* E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliations Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation Centre for Transformative Innovation, Faculty of Business and Law, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation Faculty of Education, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Current address: School of Social and Political Sciences, Faculty of Arts, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Affiliation Department of Education and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation School of Media, Culture & Creative Arts, Curtin University, Western Australia, Australia
Roles Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sport participation has been shown to be associated with health and social benefits. However, there are persisting inequities and barriers to sport participation that can prevent children and young people with diverse backgrounds and abilities from accessing these benefits. This mixed methods study investigated how diversity is understood, experienced and managed in junior sport. The study combined in-depth interviews (n = 101), surveys (n = 450) and observations over a three-year period. The results revealed that a focus on performance and competitiveness negatively affected junior sports clubs’ commitment to diversity and inclusive participation. Gender and a range of attitudes about diversity were also strongly related. On average, we found that those who identified as men were more likely to support a pro-performance stance, be homophobic, endorse stricter gender roles, and endorse violence as a natural masculine trait. In addition, those who identified as men were less likely to hold pro-disability attitudes. These findings suggest that the participation-performance tension and gender affect to what extent, and how, sports clubs engage children and young people with diverse backgrounds and abilities.
Citation: Spaaij R, Lusher D, Jeanes R, Farquharson K, Gorman S, Magee J (2019) Participation-performance tension and gender affect recreational sports clubs’ engagement with children and young people with diverse backgrounds and abilities. PLoS ONE 14(4): e0214537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214537
Editor: Valerio Capraro, Middlesex University, UNITED KINGDOM
Received: November 20, 2018; Accepted: March 14, 2019; Published: April 17, 2019
Copyright: © 2019 Spaaij et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The data collection instruments and the anonymous survey data generated during the current study are available in the Supporting Information files. However, ethical restrictions apply to the qualitative data, imposed by the Victoria University Human Research Ethics Committee. The data contain potentially sensitive information that could not only identify the source (i.e., individuals who participated in the research) but also render participants vulnerable due to reported experiences or expressions of racism, sexism, ableism and other forms of discrimination. The ethics committee allows future use of the (strictly de-identified) qualitative data for unspecified secondary analyses by other researchers, but this access is subject to written approval of data requests by the ethics committee in consultation with the research team (represented by the Lead Investigator, Professor Ramón Spaaij). Qualitative data requests can be submitted to the Victoria University Human Research Ethics Committee. The contact information for the ethics committee is as follows: Human Research Ethics Committee; Victoria University; PO Box 14428; Melbourne; Victoria 8001; Australia. Phone: 9919 4781 or 9919 4461. Email: [email protected] .
Funding: This study was supported by the Australian Research Council ( www.arc.gov.au ) in partnership with the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth), the Centre for Multicultural Youth and the Australian Football League [grant number LP130100366, awarded to RS, DL, RJ, KF and SG]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Participation in sport can have health and social benefits for both children and adults [ 1 – 3 ]. Motivations for children and young people to participate in sport centre on associated social and health outcomes [ 1 , 4 ]. On a broader level, sport participation can provide an educational context and foster social interactions that teach children social life skills, sportspersonship, teamwork, and self-efficacy [ 3 , 5 – 6 ]. Research suggests that, in certain conditions, sport has the capacity to contribute to social inclusion and, as such, it has become an important site to engage socially vulnerable young people and assist in their psychosocial development [ 7 – 8 ]. However, there are persistent inequities in sport participation [ 9 – 11 ], as well as multilevel barriers that constrain the participation of diverse population groups [ 12 – 13 ]. Historically, organized sport has been a setting where diverse young people have struggled to gain access and develop a sense of belonging, whether it be based on gender [ 14 – 17 ], race/ethnicity [ 18 – 20 ], socioeconomic status [ 11 , 21 ] or disability [ 22 – 25 ]. These social factors continue to influence disparities in sport participation today.
Providing inclusive sports activities that are safe and welcoming to diverse population groups is critical if access to the health and social benefits of recreational sport is to be broadened and democratized [ 13 , 26 ]. This study empirically investigated the policy objective of promoting inclusive sports environments for people of all backgrounds and abilities. The aim of this study was to identify how diversity is understood, experienced and managed in junior-age sport. For many children and young people, sport is an important site for socialization where they interact with people with diverse backgrounds and abilities, learn about societal norms and develop a sense of community [ 27 – 28 ].
Demographic diversity occurs when people of varied backgrounds in terms of gender, race/ethnicity, ability or other social factors are present and interact. Diversity is socially constructed: it is a result of the definitions that people in a network of social relations make. In this study, we understood and analysed diversity in relation to their sports club, as a social network or context in which definitions of diversity arose and were used. The study focused on how three forms of diversity that have historically faced discrimination and disadvantage (i.e., gender, cultural diversity, and disability) are understood, experienced and managed by junior sports participants—players, parents, volunteers, committee members and others—within the context of their club and sport. Rather than focusing solely on one type of diversity, the study thus covered a broader spectrum of (intersecting) social relations that are relevant to understanding access to sport participation and associated health and social outcomes [ 29 – 30 ].
This study used a mixed methods design that involved four integrated phases conducted over a three-year period [ 31 ]:
In this article, we report exclusively on study phases 1, 2 and 4.
The findings from different research phases and methods were compared systematically [ 32 ]. The qualitative methods in phases 1 and 4 provided rich contextual understanding coupled with the broad relationships and patterns among variables uncovered through the survey in phase 2. The survey provided an account of attitudes toward diversity within the clubs, whereas phase 4 (observations) offered a sense of process by examining socialization in ways of experiencing and managing diversity as it unfolds on the ground. Fig 1 summarizes the mixed methods research design, which contained both sequential and parallel data collection and analysis strands.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214537.g001
The research used purposive sampling to select and recruit Australian junior sports clubs for inclusion in the study. Junior sport clubs were defined as not-for-profit, voluntary based organizations that provided sports leagues and competitions to children and young people. Sports clubs are the basis of grassroots participation in organized sport in Australia. Clubs are guided by national and state sport policies as well as state and local government regulations, but have a significant degree of autonomy in their operations. Sports clubs are, in effect, responsible for the practical translation of policy ambitions. State sporting associations and organisations such as VicHealth, a quasi-governmental, statewide health promotion organisation, provide clubs with support and resources to promote inclusive sports provision at the grassroots level.
The clubs (n = 9) were selected based on the following sampling criteria:
The research team developed a database of clubs that met the sampling criteria, in consultation with the partner organizations (Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, Australian Football League and Centre for Multicultural Youth) and relevant sports governing bodies. The identified clubs were formally invited to participate in the research through an information package that outlined the research aims, methodology and the nature of participation. Club committees formally approved their club’s participation in the project in writing; for de-identification purposes, all clubs were assigned a pseudonym. The sample was diverse with regard to the clubs’ geographical location, types of sport, areas of diversity (gender, cultural diversity, disability) and socio-economic status. The clubs covered five mass participation sports: Australian Rules football, soccer, netball, basketball, and cricket. Seven clubs were located in urban areas; two clubs were located in regional and rural Victoria.
The geographical areas in which the clubs were located ranged from very low to very high in terms of socio-economic status on the Socio-Economic Index for Areas (SEIFA) [ 34 ].
Interviews..
Phase 1 of the study involved a total of 101 face-to-face interviews across the nine clubs. Interviews were conducted at club venues, cafés, workplaces or participants’ homes. Interviews with children and young people ranged from 10 to 20 minutes, while adult interviews ranged from 30 to 90 minutes. Ten per cent of participants were aged 10–14, 20% were aged 15–19, 10% were aged 20–24, 20% were aged 25–34, 20% were aged 35–44, and 20% were aged 45–54. Approximately 60% of interviewees identified as men and 40% as women. The interviews began with questions about respondents’ personal and sporting history, followed by questions that investigated their attitudes to, and perceptions and experiences of, diversity at their club ( S1 File ). Further questions explored any behaviors or actions respondents had taken to promote diversity at the club or within their own team as well as their perceptions and experiences of resistance to diversity at the club.
This aspect of the research was conducted as a cross-sectional questionnaire ( S2 File ) that examined individual-level predictors (e.g., gender, age) of various attitudes (e.g., pro-performance, gender equality) that participants within the clubs held, using linear regression models. The selection of the four clubs for this research phase was determined by initial findings from the interviews. Questionnaires were completed at club venues either after training or on game day.
This phase of the research aimed to complement the interviews and survey by providing further insights into how junior sport participants are socialized into ways of managing diversity as it unfolds on the ground. Research relationships with players, parents, coaches and other key club personnel developed within the club setting. Two clubs were invited and agreed to take part in the observation phase of the study. The researchers attended practice sessions, matches, social functions, and club meetings during one full season (six months). A semi-structured observation protocol was developed and implemented ( S3 File ).
The researchers’ positioning in relation to the social and political context of the study (i.e., the clubs and their members) is noteworthy. The researchers had had no prior engagement with the clubs, with the exception of some previous research interviews with club committee members at two of the clubs. There was no personal relationship between the researchers and the club communities at the time of the study. The research team was diverse in terms of gender, age, cultural background and academic level. Politically, they were committed to the promotion of safe and inclusive sports environments for children and adults. Throughout the study, the researchers maintained an identity as independent, university-based researchers. In the latter stages of the study, they also actively worked with club representatives to assist in translating research findings and recommendations into practice.
The research team employed multiple techniques to enhance the trustworthiness and credibility of the qualitative data. Pilot interviews and observations were initially conducted to develop and test the appropriateness of the interview questions and observation protocol. Based on this pilot, the interview guide was refined and a number of questions were reformulated and added. In addition, ongoing discussion and reflection within the research team allowed for researcher triangulation. Investigators who are experts in specific diversity issues (e.g. race/ethnicity, gender, Indigeneity) provided advice and input into the development of the interview guide and observation protocol. Finally, data triangulation was performed by systematically comparing the qualitative data to the quantitative results.
Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim, while observations were recorded using field notes. The interview transcripts and field notes were entered into Nvivo 11 data analysis software and coded using thematic analysis techniques. The research team independently read a proportion (10%) of the interview transcripts and field notes. Each investigator coded passages of text firstly using an open (or initial meaning code) and secondly an axial (or categorization of open codes) coding scheme. After similar statements related to a theme were open coded, all the statements under this code were then coded a second time to further categorize the statement. Dialogue among the research team resulted in intersubjective agreement on the interpretation of the identified passages and codes. Two research team members then coded the transcripts line by line. A third investigator reviewed the coding, resulting in a final, agreed-upon set of codes and sub-codes. The resulting coding framework for qualitative data analysis can be found in S6 File . In this specific paper, we focus on a small number of codes that emerged as highly salient during the qualitative data analysis process.
The survey data (pooled across all clubs) was analyzed using linear regression models in SPSS in order to identify overall patterns in responses and how these related to demographic details such as gender, ethno-cultural background and disability. Overall, 450 participants (63.1% male; 62.4% under 18 years of age) completed the survey ( Table 1 ). The average age was 21.0 years and the average length of club membership was 4.4 years. The average socio-economic score was 986.89. This socio-economic score is a measure used by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (SEIFA). It is based upon home postcode, with an average of 1000 (and a standard deviation of 100) and higher scores representing higher socio-economic status.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214537.t001
The Victoria University Human Research Ethics Committee approved this specific study, the study protocol, and the consent procedures, which adhered to the latest version of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans. Written consent forms were obtained from all participants. Competence to give unspecified consent was determined by the researchers during the introductory conversation (pre-interview) with potential participants (aged 13 and above). During this conversation, all relevant information regarding the project (aims, methods, participants’ rights, etc.) was communicated and, if deemed competent, the participant was asked to sign a consent form. For participants aged 13–17, one parent or guardian provided written unspecified consent, in combination with the written unspecified consent of the underage participant.
The results revealed a range of experiences of diversity at the nine sports clubs. Multiple factors influenced the way players, parents, board members, volunteers and coaches understood, experienced and managed diversity. The qualitative data showed that understandings of diversity were broad and differed significantly between individuals and clubs [ 35 ]. Particular understandings were shaped by club culture and local context; for example, clubs located in neighborhoods with high levels of cultural diversity tended to have greater awareness of and engagement with cultural diversity. Clubs tended to focus on aspects of diversity that were already present within their environments, while often neglecting or marginalising other aspects of diversity. For example, clubs with established girls’ or women’s teams reported that they were effectively supporting diversity despite their lack of consideration of other forms of diversity, such as disability or cultural diversity. The findings also revealed that clubs primarily considered and acted on individual axes of diversity in isolation; they were not inclined to view different forms of diversity as being inter-related. In doing so, their actions were informed by a narrow conception of diversity, with more intersectional understandings of diversity being virtually non-existent within the nine sport clubs.
The results identified two factors that significantly affected to what extent and how junior sports clubs’ engaged with children and young people with diverse backgrounds and abilities: the participation-performance tension, and gender.
The findings revealed a tension between the promotion of diversity and inclusive participation on the one hand, and the focus on sport performance (i.e., winning and competitiveness) on the other hand. Club members’ attitudes towards participation/ performance significantly influenced their approach to diversity. The data showed that the clubs varied in the degree to which they focused upon participation or performative aspects of sport. However, performance pressures existed at all clubs, albeit in different ways. In some clubs, diversity was afforded less priority than performance. This was evident in, for example, the way these clubs prioritized resource allocation. In the interviews, for example, diversity was often viewed as peripheral to, or diverting resources from, a club’s core business, which revolved around organizing teams and improving playing skills. These clubs thus had a particular understanding of what constituted their core business and what constituted organisational success. For example, a performance-oriented female soccer coach reflected:
“That’s one thing I see the club changing in, it used to be definitely everybody must get an equal time, equal share, blah, blah, blah. But, I do see that the club is starting to turn on, well that’s great, but the main goal is to win, and the main goal is to win premierships. But that is the way the world has gone, and that’s the way society … I wanted to help the club win some premierships; because they haven’t won premierships in a long time.”
Revealing a similar dynamics, a more participation-oriented female netball coach reflected:
“Why do we all have to push our kids you’ve got to win to be great? Someone’s got to come second. And I’m not probably pushy enough […] ‘cause I always think go out there and do your very best and I want you to have a great time. Whereas other coaches, you go to win and winning and we’re getting the championship. So I’m probably not strong enough like that. I’m better probably with littler kids. […] It’s a game of netball for God’s sakes, let’s put into perspective; they’re not going to war. Like some people are very serious about their football and netball around here.”
In the survey and interviews, most clubs positioned themselves towards the participation end of the spectrum, meaning that they identified the core aim of the club as being to provide opportunities to participate in sport. However, the qualitative data revealed that this philosophy was compromised where teams had less ability and faced repeated defeat by opposition teams. For example, two clubs reported that opposing teams’ focus on winning as opposed to giving all children equal playing time led to unsatisfactory experiences for children who lost week in week out. The male president of a soccer club described this tension as follows:
“Overall the club philosophy is about giving people as much time on the pitch as possible […] But some coaches apply that differently and it’s not really policed in that sense, so if some girls are regularly being benched it’s hard to manage that unless parents are telling us and ultimately the coach decides. There will be some pressure put on that coach about fairness, but ultimately they may have a different thing about trying to get as… make their team as competitive as possible. It’s no point playing every week where you’re getting thrashed seven nil if you’ve got half your team, your best players on the bench because you’re doing that spreading that fairly.” [ 36 ]
In addition, clubs that actively promoted diversity were generally regarded by outsiders (e.g., coaches and parents from other clubs) as not serious and as having little or no interest in developing talented players. These clubs were therefore perceived as being appropriate for children and young people who were not serious about or “no good” at sport. This labeling process presented challenges for clubs that aimed to provide opportunities for all participants, regardless of ability, and sought to instil a participation rather than performance-based culture. For example, one club had an equal game time policy for all junior players, but when they adhered to this policy and rotated high ability players, coaches received heavy criticism from parents, who argued that the team was not competitive enough.
The survey found that gender (i.e., self-identifying as female) significantly predicted pro-participation attitudes (i.e., giving everyone a chance to participate rather than playing to win) [ 35 ]. Gender (this time, identifying as man) also predicted adherence to strict gender roles (see Table 2 ). We further found that those who identified as men, but also younger participants, were more likely to agree with statements regarding masculine violence (e.g., “it’s natural for men to get into fights”). This finding may suggest greater adherence or acceptance by young people more generally for male violent behavior. Regarding homophobia, significant predictors were, again, identifying as men and being younger. Finally, we found that those who identified as women were significantly more likely to hold pro-disability attitudes captured in statements such as “I would be happy to have players with a disability on my team, even if it would limit my team’s chance of success” (see Table 2 ).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214537.t002
The qualitative data provided further insight into the role of gender [ 35 ]. The sports clubs reported that they attempted to create a welcoming and inclusive environment for girls and women, yet some clubs revealed persistent gender divisions and a male-dominated atmosphere. For example, referring to gender differences at her club, a female soccer coach stated: “The same as at every club, they have to really fight to get the same recognition as the men. I’ve always seen that, and always felt that. They could be as committed as anything, and prove their worth, but because they don’t draw the crowd that the men draw they aren’t treated as they are as important to a club as the men are.” Several respondents who identified as women reported that they did not attend club social events because they felt uncomfortable in those spaces. For example, a netball coach reported that “it is not that welcoming or friendly, I never really feel like I should be there.” The club facilities were frequently decorated with memorabilia and cultural artefacts (e.g., trophies, photographs, posters) that highlighted the men’s teams’ successes rather than the accomplishments of girls’ and women’s teams.
In line with previous studies of diversity in everyday discourse [ 37 ], this research has found that diversity was interpreted in many different, yet often abstract and universal, ways within and across the junior sports clubs. Individuals were frequently confused about the language of diversity, how diversity actually related to them within the context of their club, and the attitudes or behaviors associated with it. The particular context and culture of each club shaped the parameters for how diversity was understood and experienced, which in turn dictated practical responses to diversity within each club. This finding is consistent with recent research which suggests that the contexts of sports clubs influence how they respond to policy objectives [ 38 ].
The clubs in this study demonstrated varying levels of commitment to diversity. Overall, there was not a consistent approach to the promotion of diversity and inclusion of people of all backgrounds and abilities, nor was there consensus across the clubs that inclusive participation was an important objective. Most clubs recognized the benefits of diversity in terms of increased club membership, additional volunteers, sustainability, and social and health benefits to participants. This finding aligns with management literature that shows how organisations can enact both a business and a social justice case for diversity [ 39 ]. Yet, in contrast to previous studies which found that belief in the benefits of diversity results in higher levels of diversity management practice [ 40 ], this research revealed that junior sports club leaders and members frequently felt overwhelmed by, and under-resourced to deliver on, policy calls to actively promote diversity and social inclusion. Most clubs felt that promoting diversity was beyond their means. Clubs and their volunteers were not necessarily resisting diversity but were implementing diversity in (restricted) ways that they believed the club could cope with. This finding confirms the conclusion of previous research that volunteers face considerable pressure within sports clubs, particularly when delivering agendas that are not see as a core focus [ 41 – 42 ].
The findings complement previous studies that highlight the importance of individual and organizational commitment to diversity for organizational change and creative work environments in sport [ 43 – 46 ]. Two findings stand out. First, our results showed that gender and a range of attitudes about diversity are strongly related. On average, we found that those who identified as men were more likely to support a pro-performance stance, be homophobic, endorse stricter gender roles (while believing there is gender equality) and endorse violence as a natural masculine trait. In addition, those who identified as men were less likely to hold pro-disability attitudes. This does not mean that all individuals who identified as men endorsed such views at levels greater than all who identified as women, but that in general men’s responses were higher on average than women’s responses. These results are consistent with research on gender differences using economic games and moral dilemmas. This body of research indicates that women are more altruistic than men in Dictator Game experiments [ 47 – 48 ], somewhat more cooperative than men in social dilemmas [ 49 ], and more harm averse than men in personal moral dilemmas [ 50 ].
Contextual factors may have driven the attitudes of those who identified as men in some clubs in certain directions. Indeed, differences between clubs highlight the impact such contextual factors may have had [ 35 ]. For example, clubs varied in terms of the socioeconomic, age and cultural diversity of its membership and leadership, which interacted with gender to shape specific attitudes to diversity in complex ways. Beyond demographics, organizational culture played a role in shaping attitudes and behaviors concerning diversity, such as to what extent leaders afforded priority to inclusive participation within club structures, practices and resources. Nonetheless, the findings suggest that gender can intersect with a range of diversity attitudes and can be a facilitator or constraint to diverse and inclusive participation within sports clubs. The particular context of a sports club is likely to moderate these effects. Previous research has indicated how gender shapes girls’ and women’s participation in sport [ 14 – 17 ], but few studies have explored how gender mediates attitudes toward other forms of diversity. Our findings suggest that having more people who identify as women involved in the club, particularly in leadership and management positions, can affect club attitudes and practices toward diverse and inclusive participation. A second major finding is that attitudes of junior sports clubs and their members in regards to participation or performance significantly influenced how they understood and managed diversity. This finding reflects the documented tension between power/performance and pleasure/participation ideologies in global sport [ 51 – 52 ], suggesting that these ideologies also trickle down to the junior level.
The findings reported in this article were drawn from a purposive sample: a set of junior sports clubs that were recognized by their sports governing bodies as being relatively active and successful in promoting diverse participation. It could be hypothesized that other sports clubs, including those that do not engage with diversity or that resist efforts at diversification, experience comparable or more accentuated issues regarding the engagement and inclusion of people with diverse backgrounds and abilities. The current study expands upon existing knowledge on barriers to sport participation experienced by children and young people with diverse backgrounds and abilities. Our study warrants further research investigating the effects of pro-performance attitudes and practices, and gender relations on inclusive participation in recreational sports clubs, taking into consideration the present limitations and suggestions made.
S1 file. interview protocol..
Interview questions used in phase 1 of this study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214537.s001
Questionnaire used in phase 2 of this study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214537.s002
Observation guide used in phase 4 of this study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214537.s003
Data matrix in SPSS format used for the statistical analyses in this study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214537.s004
Regression analyses in SPSS format.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214537.s005
Codes used in qualitative data analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214537.s006
We would like to thank partner investigators Soo-Lin Quek, Shelley White and Erin Ablett for your contributions to the study. A special thanks to Ryan Storr, Georgia McGrath and Caitlyn MacKenzie for your dedicated work on this project.
Editorial: gender and racial bias in sport organizations.
Editorial on the Research Topic
Gender and Racial Bias in Sport Organizations
Legal mandates, social pressures for inclusion, and shifting demographic landscapes all contribute to an increased focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion in sport ( Cunningham, 2019 ). Some leagues, such as the Women’s National Basketball Association, excel in this area, serving as a model for others ( Lapchick, 2021 ). Despite the presence of exemplars, most of professional sport in the United States remains mired in the decades-long pattern of similarity and exclusion where White, able-bodied, cisgender, heterosexual men hold key leadership roles ( Brassil & Lutz, 2020 ). These patterns are also evident in other sport contexts in the United States and around the world ( Ahn & Cunningham, 2017 ; Cunningham et al., 2021 ; Walker & Bopp, 2011 ; Wicker et al., 2019 ; Wicker et al., 2020 ). Thus, even though members of underrepresented, minoritized groups frequently represent the majority of players, leadership roles are seemingly reserved for those who have historically held power.
In addition to limited access, members of underrepresented groups are likely to encounter stereotypes, prejudice, and treatment discrimination in sport. The disparities are evident among athletes, administrators, coaches, officials, and fans ( Burton, 2015 ; Singer, 2016 ; Sveinson et al., 2019 ; Hindman & Walker, 2020 ; Wells et al., 2021 ; Wicker & Kerwin, 2020 ). These patterns suggest that, even though group diversity is frequently associated with desired outcomes, such as organizational effectiveness and positive affective outcomes ( Lee & Cunningham, 2019 ), sport is a place where people who differ from the typical majority face various biases, limiting their access to and full participation in sport.
The purpose of this Research Topic was to explore these issues in greater depth. Specifically, we sought research from authors who 1) focused on taken-for-granted assumptions, 2) considered the myriad of factors that could influence the manifestation of bias, and 3) explored the intersections of race, gender, and other diversity forms. As we outline in the following section, the selected articles accomplished these aims.
One of the themes to materialize from the articles was the value of critically examining the presence of and consequences of diverging from taken-for-granted assumptions and practices. Frick and Moser ’s study offers an apt illustration, questioning the assumption that, among Nordic and Alpine skiers, women are less competitive than men. To do so, they analyzed decades of data from the sport. Their results showed that women and men were equally adept at managing career successes and failures, and that the career length of women and men was virtually identical. Thus, at least among elite skiers, their findings counter the notion of gender differences in competitiveness and drive. From another perspective, Braumüller et al. drew from a large-scale dataset, which included respondents from Germany, Scotland, Austria, Italy, and Hungary, to explore the experiences of transgender, non-binary, and cisgender athletes. Given that sport is largely segregated based on sex assigned at birth, and transgender and non-binary athletes challenge this demarcation, it is possible they have poor experiences in sport. Consistent with this perspective, results showed that transgender and non-binary athletes faced continued anti-trans bias, including structural forms of discrimination.
Two articles considered factors that might influence the presence of bias in sport. Mire et al. , for example, conducted a study of weightlifters and examined whether coach-athlete gender similarity influenced the athletes’ performance. Among men, gender congruence was associated with better performance. Women performed better when their coach was a man, but only until age 43, at which point they performed better when guided by a woman. The authors noted historical biases against women in the sport could contribute to these patterns. Demographic similarity, or a lack thereof, is also associated with referee decisions. Specifically, in examining multiple years of data from the National Football League, Eiserloh et al. found that Black umpires called more penalties when their referee (the leader of the team of officials) was White. The authors reasoned that Black umpires might feel more pressure to assess infractions when their team leader is White—stresses others have observed in different sport contexts ( Foreman & Turick, 2020 ).
The importance of contextual factors was highlighted in two studies. Focusing on men’s intercollegiate basketball in the United States, Nesseler et al. found that Black coaches were underrepresented—a pattern that continued for decades. The effects were more pronounced, however, in Division III institutions, which are comparatively smaller with more White undergraduate students. Gomez-Gonzalez et al. also illustrated the importance of context. The authors noted that previous researchers had found that demographic dissimilarity was associated with the number of infractions a referee called on an athlete. Most of these studies, though, were set in the United States or United Kingdom and focused on men’s sport. Gomez-Gonzalez et al. diverged from this pattern, analyzing data from women’s basketball teams in Spain. Contrary to previous work, the authors observed no effects of racial dissimilarity or nationality dissimilarity. Thus, the country and sport might moderate the relationship between dissimilarity and infractions called.
Finally, other contributors highlighted the importance of explicitly considering intersectionality—a position for which previous researchers have advocated ( Walker & Melton, 2015 ). In the first study, Bartsch and Rulofs focused on physical education teachers’ attitudes toward children from refugee backgrounds. Racialized and gendered notions of threat and vulnerability were evident, with four themes emerging: victimization and vulnerabilization, notions of threat and impulsivity, claims for assimilation and normalization , and demands for discipline . Given the increased number of refugees around the world, and the important role of physical activity and sport in their lives ( Anderson et al., 2019 ), Bartsch and Rulofs’ findings are especially instructive. Finally, Cooper and colleagues made a persuasive argument for new, innovative leadership approaches in sport. They argued that leaders should adopt anti-racism, anti-sexism, and culturally responsive stances. Only through such a paradigmatic shift can leaders hope to create and maintain diversity, equity, and inclusion in their sport organizations.
The Research Topic enhances the understanding of gender and racial bias in sport and its organizational settings. The included articles have provided rich insights into the topic from a number of perspectives, including the challenge of taken-for-granted assumptions, the study of factors that might influence the presence of bias in sport, the role of contextual factors in terms of national research settings, and the consideration of intersectionality. They help understanding how, why, and in what contexts gender and racial bias toward and discrimination of under-represented groups in sport is evident, ultimately enhancing the evidence base for taking informed action toward making sport a more inclusive and diverse environment.
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Ahn, N. Y., and Cunningham, G. B. (2017). Cultural Values and Gender Equity on National Olympic Committee Boards. Int. J. Exerc. Sci. 10 (6), 857–874.
Google Scholar
Anderson, A., Dixon, M. A., Oshiro, K. F., Wicker, P., Cunningham, G. B., and Heere, B. (2019). Managerial Perceptions of Factors Affecting the Design and Delivery of Sport for Health Programs for Refugee Populations. Sport Manage. Rev. 22 (1), 80–95. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2018.06.015
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
Brassil, G. R., and Lutz, E. (2020). 30 Years, Little Progress for U.S. Sports Leagues on Leadership Diversity . New York: New York Times . Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/12/23/sports/diversity-coaches-sports.html?auth=login-email&login=email .
Burton, L. J. (2015). Underrepresentation of Women in Sport Leadership: A Review of Research. Sport Manage. Rev. 18 (2), 155–165. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2014.02.004
Cunningham, G. B., Wicker, P., and Kutsko, K. (2021). Gendered Racial Stereotypes and Coaching Intercollegiate Athletic Teams: The Representation of Black and Asian Women Coaches on U.S. Women's and Men's Teams. Sex Roles 84, 574–583. doi:10.1007/s11199-020-01186-2
Cunningham, G. B. (2019). Diversity and Inclusion in Sport Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective . New York, NY: Routledge . doi:10.4324/9780429504310
CrossRef Full Text
Foreman, J. J., and Turick, R. M. (2020). ”The Effect of Race on Lateral Moves to Coach central Positions,” in Sport Management Review (in press). doi:10.1016/j.smr.2020.04.004
Hindman, L. C., and Walker, N. A. (2020). Sexism in Professional Sports: How Women Managers Experience and Survive Sport Organizational Culture. J. Sport Manage. 34 (1), 64–76. doi:10.1123/jsm.2018-0331
Lapchick, R. (2021). WNBA, NBA Set Standard for Diverse, Equitable, Inclusive Hiring across U.S. Sports . ESPN.com Available at: https://www.espn.com/espn/story/_/id/31003620/wnba-nba-set-standard-diverse-equitable-inclusive-hiring-us-sports .
Lee, W., and Cunningham, G. B. (2019). Group Diversity's Influence on Sport Teams and Organizations: a Meta-Analytic Examination and Identification of Key Moderators. Eur. Sport Manage. Q. 19 (2), 139–159. doi:10.1080/16184742.2018.1478440
Singer, J. N. (2016). African American Male College Athletes' Narratives on Education and Racism. Urban Educ. 51 (9), 1065–1095. doi:10.1177/0042085916669749
Sveinson, K., Hoeber, L., and Toffoletti, K. (2019). "If People Are Wearing Pink Stuff They're Probably Not Real Fans": Exploring Women's Perceptions of Sport Fan Clothing. Sport Manage. Rev. 22 (5), 736–747. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2018.12.003
Walker, N. A., and Bopp, T. (2011). The Underrepresentation of Women in the Male-Dominated Sport Workplace: Perspectives of Female Coaches. J. Workplace Rights 15 (1), 47–64. doi:10.2190/wr.15.1.d
Walker, N. A., and Melton, E. N. (2015). The Tipping point: The Intersection of Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation in Intercollegiate Sports. J. Sport Manage. 29 (3), 257–271. doi:10.1123/jsm.2013-0079
Wells, J. E., Sartore-Baldwin, M., Walker, N. A., and Gray, C. E. (2021). Stigma Consciousness and Work Outcomes of Senior Woman Administrators: The Role of Workplace Incivility. J. Sport Manage. 35 (1), 69–80. doi:10.1123/jsm.2019-0422
Wicker, P., and Kerwin, S. (2020). “Women Representation in the Boardroom of Canadian Sport Governing Bodies: Structural and Financial Characteristics of Three Organizational Clusters,” in Managing Sport and Leisure .(in press).
Wicker, P., Cunningham, G. B., and Fields, D. (2019). Head Coach Changes in Women's College Soccer: An Investigation of Women Coaches through the Lenses of Gender Stereotypes and the Glass Cliff. Sex Roles 81 (11), 797–807. doi:10.1007/s11199-019-01022-2
Wicker, P., Feiler, S., and Breuer, C. (2020). Board Gender Diversity, Critical Masses, and Organizational Problems of Non-profit Sport Clubs,” in European Sport Management Quarterly . (in press).
Keywords: diversity, equity, inclusion, gender, race, sport, intersectionality
Citation: Cunningham GB, Wicker P and Walker NA (2021) Editorial: Gender and Racial Bias in Sport Organizations. Front. Sociol. 6:684066. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.684066
Received: 22 March 2021; Accepted: 18 May 2021; Published: 31 May 2021.
Edited and reviewed by:
Copyright © 2021 Cunningham, Wicker and Walker. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: George B. Cunningham, [email protected]
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors: Kevin T. McGinniss, Ed.D. (Southern Connecticut State University), Demetri Goutos, B.A., M.B.A. (Yale University), and Yetsa A. Tuakli-Wosornu, M.D., M.P.H. (Yale University).
Corresponding author: Kevin T. McGinniss, EdD Southern Connecticut State University 501 Crescent Street, New Haven, CT USA 06515 Campus Site: Office Building 1, 108G Phone: 203-392-8837 Email: [email protected]
Kevin T. McGinniss, Ed.D. is an Assistant Professor, Graduate Coordinator, and Director of Sport Management at Southern Connecticut State University. Demetri Goutos, B.A., M.B.A., and Yetsa A. Tuakli-Wosornu, M.D., M.P.H. are members of an independent research lab at Yale University, dedicated to addressing inequities and unethical behavior in sport, while at the same time, using sport to address inequities and unethical behavior in society.
The popularization of adaptive sports on college campuses has incredible potential to affect real and meaningful change for students with disabilities across the country. Despite clear language promoting equality and fairness espoused by the NCAA and member universities, as well as legislation requiring equal opportunities for students with disabilities, early attempts to adopt inclusive sports strategies have all but evaporated. Another category of non-traditional sports programming, however, has taken off in recent years. eSports, or competitive video games, has seen a meteoric rise in support, investment, and growth on the collegiate athletic scene, and show that when properly motivated the NCAA and member institutions act with surprising conviction. With their proven ability to react and organize, and the need clearly defined, the NCAA must return its attention to increasing athletic opportunities for student-athletes with disabilities.
Key words : NCAA, eSports, disability, sports programming
INTRODUCTION
Like all sports, adaptive college sports (e.g. sports for student-athletes with disabilities) have the potential to spark positive change by bringing people together for a common purpose, but these programs need meaningful support to succeed. Given the sea-change in American attitudes towards inequities in sport, there is no better time for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) to rethink its approach to intercollegiate varsity (college-level) adaptive sports.
America is getting better about addressing inequities in sport head-on. In June 2019, the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) changed its name to the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC), projecting a view that athletes with and without disabilities hold equal status. In the same month, the U.S. Women’s soccer team toppled the world’s best in spectacular fashion, while also using its platform to highlight pay disparities between male and female players. These disparities mirror age-old, gender-based pay gaps in the broader American (and global) workplace, and America seems to have had enough. While elite American athletes are learning how to equitably share spotlight, what is happening at the college level?
The USOPC Collegiate Advisory Council (USOPC CAC) recently recommended that the NCAA institute changes to improve the intercollegiate (college) experience for student-athletes who compete internationally. This includes Paralympic athletes, who for years may not have had support on campus, even while representing the U.S. on world stages. If enacted, these recommendations may be the first steps towards filling a gap in support for student-athletes with disabilities, and may highlight disparities these students face.
Adaptive sports offer visibility and a voice to a growing community of students with disabilities. Research confirms that a broad lack of awareness continues to prevent the full social inclusion and integration of students with disabilities at American universities(1). It also shows, promisingly, that awareness-raising efforts have had a significant impact (2). Despite high levels of participation at youth and professional levels, there is a comparative and concerning dearth of college-level competitive adaptive sports venues (with some notable exceptions, such as the recent efforts by the City University of New York (CUNY) to build a collegiate wheelchair basketball team).
So how do sports programs grow? Athletics departments and the NCAA each play significant roles in the fate of any new program, deciding the program’s status, stature, organizational structure, and degree of financial and programmatic support. In the past, the NCAA has had inconsistent interest in adaptive sports. A few years ago, in response to criticism that universities were failing to offer equal opportunities to students with disabilities required under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the NCAA attempted to create change. In 2015, the Eastern Collegiate Athletics Conference (ECAC) became the first NCAA-sanctioned conference to adopt a comprehensive inclusive sport strategy providing championship opportunities for student-athletes with disabilities in swimming, rowing, and track & field, as an outgrowth of the 2013 NCAA Think Tank on Student-Athletes with Disabilities. Despite early enthusiasm, the championships have not been continued and there are no concrete signs of future support for systematic inclusion of student-athletes with disabilities from the NCAA. Meanwhile, the ECAC appears to instead be putting a major focus on expanding into eSports, as have many intercollegiate athletics departments across the country.
While it can be difficult to build a non-traditional sports program, the support given to eSports (e.g. competitive video game playing) can serve as a precedent. College eSports has seen exponential growth in the last few years, first at the club level, and more recently as full-blown, university-sponsored varsity athletic programs, some offering scholarships. Universities are wholeheartedly supporting eSports development, and the NCAA spent years investigating the potential to bring it under its banner. This level of support demonstrates institutions can move quickly and decisively when motivated.
eSports allow institutions to honor the NCAA core value of creating an “inclusive culture that fosters equitable participation for student-athletes” within member institutions(3). They also position schools to earn a slice of the eSports industry, expected to exceed $1 billion in market revenue this year. Universities are acutely aware of opportunities to gain the attention of prospective tuition-paying applicants.
Greed (and cynicism) aside, ensuring the financial viability of athletic programs and boosting application rates is an important role the NCAA and members must play. That said, it’s not a zero sum game. Institutions can attend to the business of raising actual capital (through supporting eSports, for example), while raising the bar on social capital by making sure diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts are truly diverse, equitable, and inclusive—and acknowledge all non-traditional athletes. Implementing recommendations set forth by the USOPC CAC, and re-launching the conversation started by the ECAC about adaptive sports would be a good start. Taking another look at how to better and more formally support an ever-increasing number of students with disabilities through sports would give member universities who, at least in writing, laud the value of diversity a chance to explore these themes further.
All things considered, the case for expanding varsity intercollegiate competition opportunities for student-athletes with disabilities (mandated by law) is clear.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Share this article, choose your platform.
Help | Advanced Search
Title: equity, diversity, and inclusion in sports analytics.
Abstract: This paper presents a landmark study of equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in the field of sports analytics. We developed a survey that examined personal and job-related demographics, as well as individual perceptions and experiences about EDI in the workplace. We sent the survey to individuals in the five major North American professional leagues, representatives from the Olympic and Paralympic Committees in Canada and the U.S., the NCAA Division I programs, companies in sports tech/analytics, and university research groups. Our findings indicate the presence of a clear dominant group in sports analytics identifying as: young (72.0%), White (69.5%), heterosexual (89.7%) and male (82.0%). Within professional sports, males in management positions earned roughly 30,000 USD (27%) more on average compared to females. A smaller but equally alarming pay gap of 17,000 USD (14%) was found between White and non-White management personnel. Of concern, females were nearly five times as likely to experience discrimination and twice as likely to have considered leaving their job due to isolation or feeling unwelcome. While they had similar levels of agreement regarding fair processes for rewards and compensation, females "strongly agreed" less often than males regarding equitable support, equitable workload, having a voice, and being taken seriously. Over one third (36.3%) of females indicated that they "strongly agreed" that they must work harder than others to be valued equally, compared to 9.8% of males. We conclude the paper with concrete recommendations that could be considered to create a more equitable, diverse and inclusive environment for individuals working within the sports analytics sector.
Subjects: | Applications (stat.AP) |
Cite as: | [stat.AP] |
(or [stat.AP] for this version) | |
Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Access paper:.
Code, data and media associated with this article, recommenders and search tools.
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
It is leadership, but (maybe) not as you know it: advocating for a diversity paradigm in sports leadership and beyond.
Cassidy, T.; Byrne, G. It Is Leadership, but (Maybe) Not as You Know It: Advocating for a Diversity Paradigm in Sports Leadership and Beyond. Behav. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100860
Cassidy T, Byrne G. It Is Leadership, but (Maybe) Not as You Know It: Advocating for a Diversity Paradigm in Sports Leadership and Beyond. Behavioral Sciences . 2024; 14(10):860. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100860
Cassidy, Tania, and Gary Byrne. 2024. "It Is Leadership, but (Maybe) Not as You Know It: Advocating for a Diversity Paradigm in Sports Leadership and Beyond" Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 10: 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100860
Further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
Discover the world's research
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Research methods . This paper draws upon an integrative literature review of DIM in sport organizations (n = 124). Data consist of articles gathered from Web of Science and the databases of Human Kinetics, Elsevier, Taylor and Francis and SAGE. ... Third, since the data gathering stopped in 2022 new research in sport, diversity and inclusion ...
Sport studies scholars have continued that research, with emphasis on sport media. Early research (e.g., Messner, Duncan, & Jensen, 1993) showed that female athletes receive much less and different coverage, with the emphasis on athletic ability and accomplishments for men and on femininity and physical attractiveness for women. Despite the ...
Sports have the power to bring people together across cultural divides, but they can also highlight and amplify cultural differences. As such, cultural diversity has become an increasingly important topic in the world of sports. This Research Topic seeks to explore various perspectives on cultural diversity in sports, with a particular focus on inclusion, representation, and context.We invite ...
The source was a statement that was put out by the Journal of Sport Rehabilitation for their commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion . In the statement, they addressed the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion in research and provided some future recommendations and goals for their own journal .
There are four major aspects of diversity to consider: ethical, legal, economic, and consumer/participant. First, understanding what diversity and inclusion are provides the foundation for building a better sport organization. The research in sport management indicates diversity and inclusion can be beneficial to the organization.
ArticlePDF Available. Diversity and inclusion management in sport organizations: an integrative literature review. May 2023. Managing Sport and Leisure. DOI: 10.1080/23750472.2023.2213707. License ...
There are systemic and longstanding inequalities in sport participation for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) migrants. Drawing on theoretical foundations of critical pedagogy and social justice education, as well as a public sociology perspective, this paper examines the development of an action research (AR) project to support the co-creation of inclusive climates in sports clubs ...
This commentary paper draws on existing theory and literature to explore the application of an intersectional lens to research regarding social capital development through sport. ... Qualitative Research In Sport, Exercise And Health 8(2): 213 ... Markula P, Knoppers A (eds) Research Handbook on Gender and Diversity in Sport Management ...
Inclusivity and sport communication and management. The literature on inclusivity in sport management emphasises the need to promote diversity and inclusion in sports organisations by creating inclusive environments and addressing barriers to entry for marginalised groups (Jeanes et al., Citation 2018; Shaw & Cunningham, Citation 2021).These groups include individuals with disabilities, women ...
Sport participation has been shown to be associated with health and social benefits. However, there are persisting inequities and barriers to sport participation that can prevent children and young people with diverse backgrounds and abilities from accessing these benefits. This mixed methods study investigated how diversity is understood, experienced and managed in junior sport. The study ...
Editorial on the Research Topic. Gender and Racial Bias in Sport Organizations. Overview. Legal mandates, social pressures for inclusion, and shifting demographic landscapes all contribute to an increased focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion in sport (Cunningham, 2019).Some leagues, such as the Women's National Basketball Association, excel in this area, serving as a model for others ...
NIRSA's Research and Assessment Committee has identified equity, diversity, and inclusion issues as being one of their nine critical research priorities (NIRSA, n.d.). The present study of research articles published in the RSJ during May, 2005-April, 2019 underscores this priority. Rarely were equity, diversity, and/or inclusion overtly ...
Diversifying Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in American College Athletics: The Case for Adaptive (And Other Non-Traditional) Sports. ... Research confirms that a broad lack of awareness continues to prevent the full social inclusion and integration of students with disabilities at American universities(1). It also shows, promisingly, that ...
Introduction. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the Special Issue. on gender and sex diversity in sport organizations. In doing. so, we first briefly outline the role of sex and gender in ...
4 Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto. This paper presents a landmark study of equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in the field of sports analytics. We developed a survey ...
This paper is part of a larger project that explored diversity in recreational sport in Australia (Spaaij, Farquharson et al., 2018, Spaaij et al., 2019). The project aimed to identify how diversity was understood, experienced, and managed in sports clubs (and particularly, junior sports clubs), and to develop resources and guidelines that ...
Research question: Diversity and inclusion management (DIM) is central to organizational science and studies of sport's contribution to diversity and inclusion in society are plentiful, e.g. through the "sport for development" field. But what is the status of existing research about DIM within sport organizations?
Diversity and Inclusion in Sport. Volume 5, Issue 1. Participation in sport can provide psychosocial benefits, but only within an intentionally created environment (Petitpas, Cornelius, Raalte, & Jones, 2005). Psychosocial benefits do not extend to those who experience limited access to sport, and/or who experience additional social stressors ...
A final area of research which holds promise is the growing body of evidence that suggests LGBTQ+ diversity may have direct benefits to the overall success of sport teams and improve the experiences of everyone in sport settings (Cunningham, Citation 2011; Cunningham & Hussain, Citation 2020; Cunningham & Nite, Citation 2020). Much of this ...
This paper presents a landmark study of equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in the field of sports analytics. We developed a survey that examined personal and job-related demographics, as well as individual perceptions and experiences about EDI in the workplace. We sent the survey to individuals in the five major North American professional ...
and Educational Services, College of Education, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210. Diversity Issues in Sport and Leisure. George B. Cunningham. T exas A&M University. Janet S. Fink. The ...
The diversity of Black America in general, and how it pertains to gender in particular, remains understudied in analyses of sports media. To get a better understanding of the Black female athlete in our society today, this project addresses the intersections of race, gender, and nationality/ethnicity in U.S. media.
The need to 'rethink leadership' is on the radar of many, from global finance and auditing organisations (e.g., Deloitte) and global sports organisations (e.g., the International Olympic Committee) to national and local sports organisations concerned about the decreasing numbers of participants or the lack of women coaches. Yet, is the dominant Western leadership orthodoxy fit for purpose ...
Content may be subject to copyright. The Contribution of Sports to Gender Equality and. Women' s Empowerment 1. Allison Huggins and Shirley Randell. Abstract. In both subtle and explicit ways ...
Purpose: The aim of this paper is to explore whether national diversity in the form of national variety (differences in kind, e.g. number of nationalities) has a positive effect on group processes and performance whereas national separation (differences in attitudes and beliefs; i.e. social distance and national stereotypes) has a negative effect. Design/methodology/approach: This cross ...
In this commentary, we instead demonstrate the value of approaching equity and inclusion as allied causes. We offer four principles of Gender Inclusive Sport as an alternative policy and research paradigm: lead with inclusion; de-centre regulatory science; increase access to community and youth sport; and double down on gender equity.