Detrimental Effects
Note: The codes listed under the ethical code violations column are General Principles and Ethical Standards from the American Psychological Association (2002, as amended in 2010) . Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. American Psychologist , 57, 1060–1073.
There are circumstances (e.g., requests from the court) under which APA has taken a position on controversial issues. APA adopts a stance based on extensive evidence in the literature. Several amici curiae briefs have been produced from APA documenting research on controversial issues such as abortion rights (e.g., Harris v. McRae, 1980 ; Planned Parenthood et al., v. Mike Rounds et al. , 2010; Planned Parenthood of SE Pennsylvania v. Casey, 1992 ), anti-discrimination against sexual orientation (e.g., Boy Scouts of America v. Dale , 2003; Romer v. Evans, 1996 ; Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati Inc. v. City of Cincinnati, 1995, 1997, 1998 ), anti-sodomy laws (e.g., Campbell v. Sundquist, 1996 ; Jegley v. Picado, 2002 ; New York v. Uplinger, 1984 ), pro-custody rights for parents who identify as gay (e.g., Boswell v. Boswell, 1998 ; Bottoms v. Bottoms, 1995 ; Delong v. Delong, 1998 ), same-sex marriage rights (e.g., Andersen v. King County, 2006 ; Golinski v. Office of Personnel Management , 2012; Perry v. Schwarzenegger, 2012 ; Varnum v. Brien, 2009 ), and foster care and adoption rights for same-sex couples ( Boseman v. Jarrell, 2010 ; Department of Human Services v. Howard, 2006 ; Romer v. Evans, 1996 ). For example, research on some of these topics includes literature reviews on the effects of abortion on psychological health. These reviews revealed that women who got an abortion were no worse off psychologically in the long-term than were either pregnant women undergoing high-risk pregnancies who were threatened by miscarriage or women undergoing healthy pregnancies ( Bradshaw & Slade, 2003 ; Charles, Polis, Sridhara, & Blum, 2008 ) or women delivering an unwanted baby ( Major et al., 2009 ). In addition, extensive research has provided evidence that same-sex and opposite-sex relationships do not differ on important psychosocial variables ( Herek, 2006 ; Kurdek, 2005 ), and that same-sex couples are not limited by their sexual orientation in their ability to provide a nurturing environment to raise children ( Herek, 2006 ). There are psychologists who are APA members who do not agree with the stance the APA has taken on controversial issues; however, Standard 2.04 (bases for scientific and professional judgments) prevents these psychologists from making public, professional judgments on an issue without scientific or professional knowledge supporting their beliefs ( APA, 2002 ).
With this in mind, would it be appropriate for a psychologist to take a high profile stance on controversial issues that APA does endorse? The same concerns remain for practicing psychologists in terms of respecting clients’ individual beliefs and potential negative impact on the therapeutic alliance because the therapist would no longer be seen as unbiased. If a controversial issue is pertinent to therapy, then it would be important to provide psychoeducation to the client, but not more important than building rapport and protecting the therapeutic relationship. On the other hand, psychologists in teaching and research have the duty to educate the public especially on controversial issues with extensive research supporting a claim. All information must be presented accurately and honestly and within the bounds of the psychologist’s competency. However, psychologists in teaching and research may bump into the same issues with students, mentees, and supervisees. Thus, the goal might be for these psychologists to devise a plan to educate the public while minimizing harm to professional relationships.
Despite the extensive literature and the clear position that the APA holds on some controversial issues, there sometimes continues to be research published which is contrary to APA’s position. One example includes controversy regarding the ability to “cure” homosexuality. Considerable research has documented that conversion therapy to “reorient” gays is not effective or efficacious and actually results in poorer outcomes for individuals undergoing this therapy (e.g., Haldeman, 1994 ; Hancock, Gock, & Haldeman, 2012 ; Morrow & Beckstead, 2004 ). The American Psychiatric Association took the stance that homosexuality is not a pathological disorder that should be treated through the removal of homosexuality as a disorder from the DSM-II ( American Psychiatric Association, 1968 ) in 1973 (for reviews on this issue see Bayer, 1981 ; Spitzer, 1981 ; Bayer & Spitzer 1981; Drescher, 2012 ). Additionally, the APA took the same stance through several amici curiae briefs supporting gay rights (see citations listed above), through the passing of the resolution stating that homosexuality is not a disorder and that psychologists should not discriminate against individuals who identify as such ( APA, 1997 ), through the report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation ( APA, 2009 ), and through the article published by the APA concluding that there is insufficient evidence supporting efforts to change sexual orientation ( Munsey, 2009 ). However, research continues to be conducted on therapeutic approaches (e.g., conversion therapy, reparative therapy, sexual orientation change efforts [SOCE]) for treating homosexuality (e.g., Karten & Wade, 2010 ; Nicolosi, 2009 ; Nicolosi, Byrd, & Potts, 2000 ; Spitzer, 2003 ; Throckmorton, 2002 ) 3 . There are several examples, such as this, of conflicting evidence in the literature on controversial issues; however, it is psychologists’ professional duty to critically evaluate what they read and take into account limitations of the studies before drawing conclusions and holding a public position based on research. Regardless of the discordant published evidence in the literature, the reality is that if the American Psychiatric and Psychological Associations took a public stance on a controversial issue, then the research opposing APA’s view is, at this point, not substantial enough to make a difference. This does not mean that all psychologists must agree with the APA’s values or even that the APA is always right. Instead, psychologists should be able to identify when their views conflict and be able to reach a point where they can maintain their personal beliefs while adhering to their professional responsibilities as psychologist. Ideally this point of reconciling personal values with professional expectations would occur during graduate training.
Discussion of this issue with psychologists in training would be an excellent way to be proactive. Trainees, as well as psychologists, have the duty to “do no harm,” so they should be especially cautious of the implications their actions may have on the community. Graduate students and other trainees, particularly at the start of the acculturation process into the profession (see Berry, 1980 ; Berry & Sam, 1997 ; Bersoff, 2008 ; Handelsman, Gottlieb, & Knapp, 2005 ), are often naive in realizing how their personal public behavior could be perceived by the community. Personal beliefs and values may obstruct trainees from noticing the impact of their actions. Ethics courses or seminars would be an ideal place for students to learn about the potential negative effects of publically advocating for a controversial issue. These courses or seminars could provide a space for students to strategize about how they could be involved in something they are passionate about in their personal time without giving the impression that their participation is representative of the field of psychology or have harmful effects on the public or clients (see Table 1 for suggested behavior). Further, training on this issue should incorporate readings on values and decision-making, and case examples such as those provided earlier in this paper, to guide class discussions. These discussions should aid trainees in becoming aware of their own values and opinions, learn about the profession’s values as identified in the General Principles, and obtain some resolution when these differ. Role plays and debates around values and current events could also help trainees understand the extent of the issue and the potential predicaments involved. Trainees, in psychology and other health care providing fields, in their early 20s who are not far from their undergraduate student identities, may have a more difficult time adjusting to the ‘restrictions’ of taking on a professional identity; therefore, an Ethics course utilizing these tools can be critical in facilitating this transition. Including a conversation in training programs on ethical considerations psychologists should keep in mind before taking a public stance on a contentious issue is a practical way to protect the trainee, clients, and the profession from unintended harm.
The present paper outlined important factors that psychologists should consider before publically taking a stance on a contentious issue. As mentioned earlier, the APA Principles and Standards only apply to psychologists in their professional roles. Ideally, on a personal level, when psychologists leave the office for the day, their work identity could be left behind as well. Unlike many other professions, however, psychologists’ professional and personal lives intersect frequently. Psychologists need to be mindful of where they socialize and their behavior in public places in order to protect against multiple relationships, conflicts of interest, and the image that is projected of the profession. These situations are not always avoidable especially for psychologists working in rural areas and when psychologists decide to publically promote a personal value or position; the latter case will have a wider and multilevel impact no matter what the location. Notably, of course one cannot tell psychologists that they should not hold their own opinions and beliefs outside of APA or participate in public events related to their personal views. Nevertheless, it is important to discuss the effects of psychologists taking on high-profile public positions in which the intent is to promote values or beliefs or to influence others on controversial issues and how this can impact professional relationships, APA, and the general public. The Ethics Code does not preclude psychologists from taking a public stance on controversial issues; however, doing so could have numerous unanticipated and potentially negative effects that psychologists should be mindful of in order to exercise careful professional, ethical decision-making. Given that the ethical mandate is to not do harm, it is essential that psychologists are aware of how their actions in their personal time might negatively impact their professional relationships.
The recommendation for psychologists contemplating taking a public position on a controversial issue is to first consider potential outcomes and worse case scenarios in order to be proactive in planning necessary steps to reduce harm to professional relationships and the profession. This would involve psychologists’ using professional judgment, seeking consultation from professionals familiar with the Ethics Code and the particular situation, and documenting steps taken to protect themselves and their professional relationships. Following a decisional analysis (e.g., Gottlieb, 1993 ; Pope & Vasquez, 2011 ) can aid in arriving at a decision that will reduce harm to the psychologist and other parties involved.
The ultimate goal may be for psychologists to be able to distinguish between their personal beliefs and their professional role; however, putting this into action may be more difficult than it appears. Given this difficulty, it seems a psychologist’s behavior is never really viewed the same as a private citizen. Although psychologists might like their personal lives to be independent from their professional lives, the reality is that their identity as psychologists may never be detached, even outside of a professional context, for those familiar with the psychologist’s line of work. Suggestions have been made to extend the General Principles so they apply to the personal lives of psychologists ( Pipes et al., 2005 ). Despite the fact that the Ethics Code does not apply to the personal lives of psychologists, behavior in their personal time could still have detrimental effects on their professional relationships and the public. It is essential that psychologists keep this in mind when out in the community, especially if considering taking a public position on a controversial issue.
The present study was supported by the NIAAA grant T32 AA13526 to Kenneth J. Sher.
Publisher's Disclaimer: Disclaimer: This is a version of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of the accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to this version also.
Publisher's Disclaimer: Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
1 For the purposes of this paper, American Psychological Association will be denoted as APA and the American Psychiatric Association will be spelled out when referenced.
2 Notably, “product” could be broadened to include public endorsement of a value or belief.
3 Interestingly, one psychologist, who purported that his research provided evidence that homosexuality could be cured and whose work was used by many people and organizations to support their beliefs that homosexuality was a choice, recently published a letter to the editor of Archives of Behavior reassessing his research ( Spitzer, 2003 ) and apologizing to the gay community for his unverified claims of the efficacy of reparative therapy ( Spitzer, 2012 ).
Everything begins with an idea!
Psychology is the most interesting discipline of all since it deliberates on how humans respond in diverse situations. To write the best paper about the human mind, you should comprehend the fundamental theories of psychology. If the topic is arguable, you cannot write without understanding it. However, selecting an issue is the first step and the most significant part of the procedure. The controversy is essential to scientific development, and science is the confidence in the ignorance of specialists. We do not have to believe everything, but assumptions are open for additional study. Therefore, psychology studies continue to create controversy. Often the debate is about opinions about ethics or logic of ways, other times as results of differences of the consequences of the outcomes to the comprehension of human nature.
Psychologists have done numerous psychology experiments that seem inhumane, unethical, and controversial. As a result of these and other popular tests, guidelines, and rules to help conduct humane and ethical research are in place. Getting solid controversial psychology topic ideas is the most crucial stage in choosing what to write about in controversial psychology, but it’s not an easy task for starters. Psychology is a broad discipline, so you would like to choose a topic that will encompass all of your ideas, without overwhelming you with tones of information. Please select an item that is adequately narrow to permit you focuses on the issue, but not very tight such that it is hard to get material to write about. You need to narrow your focus to a point within a particular division of psychology. The following list is the theme proposal examples of controversial psychology topics.
Controversial psychology topics researches of current are mostly health issues in society. The findings are in-depth and give us a clue about what transpires in the human mind.
Have top experts do your papers.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Topics for research, papers, and other projects
Are you looking for a developmental psychology topic for a psychology paper , experiment, or science fair project? Topics you might pick can range from prenatal development to health during the final stages of life.
Developmental psychology is a broad topic that involves studying how people grow and change throughout their whole lifetime. Topics don't just include physical growth but also the emotional, cognitive, and social development that people experience at different stages of their lives.
The following are just a few different topics that might help inspire you. Remember, these are just ideas to help you get started. You might opt to explore one of these areas, or you might think of a related question that interests you as well.
Developmental psychology is a huge and diverse subject, so picking a topic isn't always easy. Some tips that can help you choose a good developmental psychology topic include:
Before you start working on any paper, experiment, or science project, the first thing you need to do is understand the rules your instructor has established for the assignment.
Also, be sure to check the official guidelines given by your teacher. If you are not sure about these guidelines, ask your instructor if there are any specific requirements before you get started on your research .
If you are going to actually conduct an experiment , you need to present your idea to your instructor to gain their permission before going forward. In some cases, you might have to also present your plan to your school's Institutional Review Board.
After you have gotten to move forward with your chosen topic, the next step is to do some background research. This step is essential! If you are writing a paper, the information you find will make up your literature review.
If you are performing an experiment, it will provide background information for the introduction of your lab report . For a psychology science project, this research will help you in your presentation and can help you decide how to best approach your own experiment.
Choosing a topic for a developmental psychology experiment, paper, or project can be tough! The ideas above can be a great place to start, but you might also consider questions you've had about your own life. Once you have a general idea for your topic, narrow it down, do some background research and talk to your instructor.
Nielsen M, Haun D. Why developmental psychology is incomplete without comparative and cross-cultural perspectives . Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci . 2016;371(1686):20150071. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0071
Leite DFB, Padilha MAS, Cecatti JG. Approaching literature review for academic purposes: The Literature Review Checklist . Clinics (Sao Paulo) . 2019;74:e1403. Published 2019 Nov 25. doi:10.6061/clinics/2019/e1403
Grady C. Institutional review boards: Purpose and challenges . Chest . 2015;148(5):1148-1155. doi:10.1378/chest.15-0706
Kim WO. Institutional review board (IRB) and ethical issues in clinical research . Korean Journal of Anesthesiology . 2012;62(1):3-12. doi:10.4097/kjae.2012.62.1.3
By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."
We are a place for students of psychology to discuss study methods, receive assistance with homework, enquire for job-searching advice, and all else that come to mind. This community is aimed at those at the beginner to intermediate level, generally in or around undergraduate studies. Graduate students and professionals are recommended to our sister subreddit, r/AcademicPsychology.
Hello! I have to write an essay for psych about a controversial issue in psychology and I was wondering what my fellow psych redditors thought!? Do you have a favourite controversial topic? do you know any? I have to choose one for my essay and I've been doing some research and thought I'd ask reddit too!
Can people be addicted to video games?
Are children with ADHD prescribed medication too often?
Why has depression become such a widespread illness?
Why are superhero movies so popular?
Should marijuana be legalized?
Should students be allowed to use laptops in the classroom?
These are some examples that were given and I found! what do you think ?
By continuing, you agree to our User Agreement and acknowledge that you understand the Privacy Policy .
You’ve set up two-factor authentication for this account.
Create your username and password.
Reddit is anonymous, so your username is what you’ll go by here. Choose wisely—because once you get a name, you can’t change it.
Enter your email address or username and we’ll send you a link to reset your password
An email with a link to reset your password was sent to the email address associated with your account
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Explore interesting psychology research topics—ideal for students and professionals. Get ideas for your next research project here.
If you need to write a paper in your psychology class, there are several psychology research topics to consider. Here are 50+ topics of psychology research.
Controversial Topics for Psychology Research Papers. The history of psychology is not always positive, and if you enjoy writing about controversial topics, psychology's history is rich with material. The use of lobotomies to treat mental illness. The history of mental asylums in the United States. The use and effects of electroconvulsive therapy.
The question of behavioral universality vs. cultural variability is a hot one, and some of the best research being done by psychologists examines questions related to this particular debate.
Controversy is essential to scientific progress - here we digest ten of the most controversial studies in psychology's history.
Controversial topics in psychology research question examples Some psychology topics don't fit into any of the subcategories above, but they may still be worthwhile topics to consider.
In 2022, psychological science will play an increasingly outsize role in the debate about how to solve the world's most intractable challenges. Human behavior is at the heart of many of the biggest issues with which we grapple: inequality, climate change, the future of work, health and well-being, vaccine hesitancy, and misinformation. Psychologists have been asked not only to have a seat at ...
Explore 100 Controversial psychology topics that challenge our understanding of human behavior. Dive into ethics, cognition and more.
Issues and debates" in psychology refers to the discussions around key topics such as nature vs. nurture, free will vs. determinism, individual vs. situational explanations, reductionism vs. holism, and the ethics of psychological research. They inform and shape the theories, methodologies, and interpretations in the field.
Among a sample of U.S. psychology professors, we identified a set of controversial research conclusions, and we explored the professors' empirical beliefs, self-censorship, desire to discourage controversial research, support for punishing peers who put forward controversial conclusions, and normative preferences surrounding academic freedom.
Psychology is a field of study that is always evolving, and there are often new controversial topics emerging. In this article, we will explore some of the most controversial Psychology Topics, including social media addiction, the impact of nature vs. nurture, and the use of psychiatric medication.
Exploring controversial topics: Opposing Viewpoints. Find pro and con essays on controversial topics in the Opposing Viewpoints database.
Controversial topics in a controversial subject - well, that's a hell of a lot of controversy you're looking for. Since its inception, or rather, acceptance as a possible field of study, psychology has tread tricky water as the public opinion regarding its various assumptions, theories, and methods has always bordered on doubt mixed with fear.
This page provides a comprehensive list of psychology thesis topics, ideal for students seeking inspiration and guidance.Whether you are interested in clinical psychology, cognitive psychology, or social psychology, our extensive list includes 1200 carefully curated topics, divided into 30 distinct categories, to help you find the perfect subject for your research.
Course Objectives Become a wise consumer of psychological research and information that you are exposed to through the media. Develop your critical thinking skills by examining important historical and current research in psychology. Improve your writing and oral presentation skills by writing and speaking about controversial topics
This guide will help you research and write a literature review on a topic in psychology for Professor Amanda O'Bryan's PSY 110 sections. Here is a list of controversial issues that might make for good paper topics.
Sometimes it seems like coming up with a good psychology research topic for a paper is harder than the actual research and writing. When it comes to writing a psychology research paper, there are many topics to choose from. However, it can be challenging to find a topic that is both interesting and has enough research to support your paper.
All interesting psychology research topics are designed to focus on psychology. You will have to write about a condition, disorder, experiment, or even a literature review. Keep in mind that you can also write about psychology research topics on social media or social elements of society. Yes, psychology affects that as well.
Psychology topics Psychology is a diverse discipline grounded in science, but with nearly boundless applications in everyday life. Scientific research conducted by psychologists can inform and guide those seeking help with issues that affect their professional lives, family relationships, and emotional wellness.
The present paper examines ethical issues that a) should be taken into account before psychologists take a public position on a controversial issue, and b) are in conflict with APA's Ethics Code or current research.
Controversial Psychology Topics Psychology is the most interesting discipline of all since it deliberates on how humans respond in diverse situations. To write the best paper about the human mind, you should comprehend the fundamental theories of psychology. If the topic is arguable, you cannot write without understanding it. However, selecting an issue is the first step and the most ...
Developmental psychology topics can cover early childhood to older adulthood. If you need a topic for a project, experiment, or paper, here are a few great ideas.
Hello! I have to write an essay for psych about a controversial issue in psychology and I was wondering what my fellow psych redditors thought!? Do you have a favourite controversial topic? do you know any? I have to choose one for my essay and I've been doing some research and thought I'd ask reddit too!