This is the Difference Between a Hypothesis and a Theory
What to Know A hypothesis is an assumption made before any research has been done. It is formed so that it can be tested to see if it might be true. A theory is a principle formed to explain the things already shown in data. Because of the rigors of experiment and control, it is much more likely that a theory will be true than a hypothesis.
As anyone who has worked in a laboratory or out in the field can tell you, science is about process: that of observing, making inferences about those observations, and then performing tests to see if the truth value of those inferences holds up. The scientific method is designed to be a rigorous procedure for acquiring knowledge about the world around us.
![what are a hypothesis and a theory hypothesis](https://merriam-webster.com/assets/mw/images/article/art-wap-article-main/hypothesis-3534-c955432a0c98d971174ee806b6d40979@1x.jpg)
In scientific reasoning, a hypothesis is constructed before any applicable research has been done. A theory, on the other hand, is supported by evidence: it's a principle formed as an attempt to explain things that have already been substantiated by data.
Toward that end, science employs a particular vocabulary for describing how ideas are proposed, tested, and supported or disproven. And that's where we see the difference between a hypothesis and a theory .
A hypothesis is an assumption, something proposed for the sake of argument so that it can be tested to see if it might be true.
In the scientific method, the hypothesis is constructed before any applicable research has been done, apart from a basic background review. You ask a question, read up on what has been studied before, and then form a hypothesis.
![](http://ortec.site/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
What is a Hypothesis?
A hypothesis is usually tentative, an assumption or suggestion made strictly for the objective of being tested.
When a character which has been lost in a breed, reappears after a great number of generations, the most probable hypothesis is, not that the offspring suddenly takes after an ancestor some hundred generations distant, but that in each successive generation there has been a tendency to reproduce the character in question, which at last, under unknown favourable conditions, gains an ascendancy. Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species , 1859 According to one widely reported hypothesis , cell-phone transmissions were disrupting the bees' navigational abilities. (Few experts took the cell-phone conjecture seriously; as one scientist said to me, "If that were the case, Dave Hackenberg's hives would have been dead a long time ago.") Elizabeth Kolbert, The New Yorker , 6 Aug. 2007
What is a Theory?
A theory , in contrast, is a principle that has been formed as an attempt to explain things that have already been substantiated by data. It is used in the names of a number of principles accepted in the scientific community, such as the Big Bang Theory . Because of the rigors of experimentation and control, its likelihood as truth is much higher than that of a hypothesis.
It is evident, on our theory , that coasts merely fringed by reefs cannot have subsided to any perceptible amount; and therefore they must, since the growth of their corals, either have remained stationary or have been upheaved. Now, it is remarkable how generally it can be shown, by the presence of upraised organic remains, that the fringed islands have been elevated: and so far, this is indirect evidence in favour of our theory . Charles Darwin, The Voyage of the Beagle , 1839 An example of a fundamental principle in physics, first proposed by Galileo in 1632 and extended by Einstein in 1905, is the following: All observers traveling at constant velocity relative to one another, should witness identical laws of nature. From this principle, Einstein derived his theory of special relativity. Alan Lightman, Harper's , December 2011
Non-Scientific Use
In non-scientific use, however, hypothesis and theory are often used interchangeably to mean simply an idea, speculation, or hunch (though theory is more common in this regard):
The theory of the teacher with all these immigrant kids was that if you spoke English loudly enough they would eventually understand. E. L. Doctorow, Loon Lake , 1979 Chicago is famous for asking questions for which there can be no boilerplate answers. Example: given the probability that the federal tax code, nondairy creamer, Dennis Rodman and the art of mime all came from outer space, name something else that has extraterrestrial origins and defend your hypothesis . John McCormick, Newsweek , 5 Apr. 1999 In his mind's eye, Miller saw his case suddenly taking form: Richard Bailey had Helen Brach killed because she was threatening to sue him over the horses she had purchased. It was, he realized, only a theory , but it was one he felt certain he could, in time, prove. Full of urgency, a man with a mission now that he had a hypothesis to guide him, he issued new orders to his troops: Find out everything you can about Richard Bailey and his crowd. Howard Blum, Vanity Fair , January 1995
And sometimes one term is used as a genus, or a means for defining the other:
Laplace's popular version of his astronomy, the Système du monde , was famous for introducing what came to be known as the nebular hypothesis , the theory that the solar system was formed by the condensation, through gradual cooling, of the gaseous atmosphere (the nebulae) surrounding the sun. Louis Menand, The Metaphysical Club , 2001 Researchers use this information to support the gateway drug theory — the hypothesis that using one intoxicating substance leads to future use of another. Jordy Byrd, The Pacific Northwest Inlander , 6 May 2015 Fox, the business and economics columnist for Time magazine, tells the story of the professors who enabled those abuses under the banner of the financial theory known as the efficient market hypothesis . Paul Krugman, The New York Times Book Review , 9 Aug. 2009
Incorrect Interpretations of "Theory"
Since this casual use does away with the distinctions upheld by the scientific community, hypothesis and theory are prone to being wrongly interpreted even when they are encountered in scientific contexts—or at least, contexts that allude to scientific study without making the critical distinction that scientists employ when weighing hypotheses and theories.
The most common occurrence is when theory is interpreted—and sometimes even gleefully seized upon—to mean something having less truth value than other scientific principles. (The word law applies to principles so firmly established that they are almost never questioned, such as the law of gravity.)
This mistake is one of projection: since we use theory in general use to mean something lightly speculated, then it's implied that scientists must be talking about the same level of uncertainty when they use theory to refer to their well-tested and reasoned principles.
The distinction has come to the forefront particularly on occasions when the content of science curricula in schools has been challenged—notably, when a school board in Georgia put stickers on textbooks stating that evolution was "a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things." As Kenneth R. Miller, a cell biologist at Brown University, has said , a theory "doesn’t mean a hunch or a guess. A theory is a system of explanations that ties together a whole bunch of facts. It not only explains those facts, but predicts what you ought to find from other observations and experiments.”
While theories are never completely infallible, they form the basis of scientific reasoning because, as Miller said "to the best of our ability, we’ve tested them, and they’ve held up."
More Differences Explained
- Epidemic vs. Pandemic
- Diagnosis vs. Prognosis
- Treatment vs. Cure
Word of the Day
See Definitions and Examples »
Get Word of the Day daily email!
Games & Quizzes
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Play Quordle: Guess all four words in a limited number of tries. Each of your guesses must be a real 5-letter word.](https://merriam-webster.com/assets/mw/static/images/games/external/quordle/485x364@1x.jpg)
Commonly Confused
'canceled' or 'cancelled', 'virus' vs. 'bacteria', your vs. you're: how to use them correctly, is it 'jail' or 'prison', 'deduction' vs. 'induction' vs. 'abduction', grammar & usage, every letter is silent, sometimes: a-z list of examples, how to use em dashes (—), en dashes (–) , and hyphens (-), the difference between 'i.e.' and 'e.g.', plural and possessive names: a guide, 31 useful rhetorical devices, pilfer: how to play and win, 8 words with fascinating histories, flower etymologies for your spring garden, 8 words for lesser-known musical instruments, it's a scorcher words for the summer heat.
Hypothesis vs. Theory
A hypothesis is either a suggested explanation for an observable phenomenon, or a reasoned prediction of a possible causal correlation among multiple phenomena. In science , a theory is a tested, well-substantiated, unifying explanation for a set of verified, proven factors. A theory is always backed by evidence; a hypothesis is only a suggested possible outcome, and is testable and falsifiable.
Comparison chart
Hypothesis | Theory | |
---|---|---|
Definition | A suggested explanation for an observable phenomenon or prediction of a possible causal correlation among multiple phenomena. | In , a theory is a well-substantiated, unifying explanation for a set of verified, proven hypotheses. |
Based on | Suggestion, possibility, projection or prediction, but the result is uncertain. | Evidence, verification, repeated testing, wide scientific consensus |
Testable | Yes | Yes |
Falsifiable | Yes | Yes |
Is well-substantiated? | No | Yes |
Is well-tested? | No | Yes |
Data | Usually based on very limited data | Based on a very wide set of data tested under various circumstances. |
Instance | Specific: Hypothesis is usually based on a very specific observation and is limited to that instance. | General: A theory is the establishment of a general principle through multiple tests and experiments, and this principle may apply to various specific instances. |
Purpose | To present an uncertain possibility that can be explored further through experiments and observations. | To explain why a large set of observations are consistently made. |
Examples of Theory and Hypothesis
Theory: Einstein's theory of relativity is a theory because it has been tested and verified innumerable times, with results consistently verifying Einstein's conclusion. However, simply because Einstein's conclusion has become a theory does not mean testing of this theory has stopped; all science is ongoing. See also the Big Bang theory , germ theory , and climate change .
Hypothesis: One might think that a prisoner who learns a work skill while in prison will be less likely to commit a crime when released. This is a hypothesis, an "educated guess." The scientific method can be used to test this hypothesis, to either prove it is false or prove that it warrants further study. (Note: Simply because a hypothesis is not found to be false does not mean it is true all or even most of the time. If it is consistently true after considerable time and research, it may be on its way to becoming a theory.)
This video further explains the difference between a theory and a hypothesis:
Common Misconception
People often tend to say "theory" when what they're actually talking about is a hypothesis. For instance, "Migraines are caused by drinking coffee after 2 p.m. — well, it's just a theory, not a rule."
This is actually a logically reasoned proposal based on an observation — say 2 instances of drinking coffee after 2 p.m. caused a migraine — but even if this were true, the migraine could have actually been caused by some other factors.
Because this observation is merely a reasoned possibility, it is testable and can be falsified — which makes it a hypothesis, not a theory.
- What is a Scientific Hypothesis? - LiveScience
- Wikipedia:Scientific theory
Related Comparisons
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Accuracy vs Precision](https://static.diffen.com/uploadz/4/43/thumb_accuracy-vs-precision.jpg)
Share this comparison via:
If you read this far, you should follow us:
"Hypothesis vs Theory." Diffen.com. Diffen LLC, n.d. Web. 3 Jul 2024. < >
Comments: Hypothesis vs Theory
Anonymous comments (2).
October 11, 2013, 1:11pm "In science, a theory is a well-substantiated, unifying explanation for a set of verified, proven hypotheses." But there's no such thing as "proven hypotheses". Hypotheses can be tested/falsified, they can't be "proven". That's just not how science works. Logical deductions based on axioms can be proven, but not scientific hypotheses. On top of that I find it somewhat strange to claim that a theory doesn't have to be testable, if it's built up from hypotheses, which DO have to be testable... — 80.✗.✗.139
May 6, 2014, 11:45pm "Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things." this statement is poorly formed because it implies that a thing is a theory until it gets proven and then it is somehow promoted to fact. this is just a misunderstanding of what the words mean, and of how science progresses generally. to say that a theory is inherently dubious because "it isn't a fact" is pretty much a meaningless statement. no expression which qualified as a mere fact could do a very good job of explaining the complicated process by which species have arisen on Earth over the last billion years. in fact, if you claimed that you could come up with such a single fact, now THAT would be dubious! everything we observe in nature supports the theory of evolution, and nothing we observe contradicts it. when you can say this about a theory, it's a pretty fair bet that the theory is correct. — 71.✗.✗.151
- Accuracy vs Precision
- Deductive vs Inductive
- Subjective vs Objective
- Subconscious vs Unconscious mind
- Qualitative vs Quantitative
- Creationism vs Evolution
Edit or create new comparisons in your area of expertise.
Stay connected
© All rights reserved.
Alchem Learning
Similarities and Differences Between Hypothesis and Theory
In the realm of scientific inquiry, two terms that are often used interchangeably but hold distinct meanings are “hypothesis” and “theory.” Both play crucial roles in the scientific method, contributing to the understanding and advancement of knowledge. This article delves into the similarities and differences between these two fundamental scientific concepts.
Hypothesis: The Starting Point
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. It is an educated guess or a tentative solution to a problem based on existing knowledge. Scientists formulate hypotheses to guide their research and make predictions that can be tested through experimentation or observation.
Characteristics
- Testability: A good hypothesis is testable, meaning it can be investigated through empirical methods.
- Falsifiability: It should be possible to prove the hypothesis false through experimentation or observation.
- Specificity: The hypothesis must be clear and specific, outlining the expected outcome of the experiment.
If plants receive more sunlight, then their growth rate will increase.
Theory: A Comprehensive Explanation
On the other hand, a theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world. Unlike a hypothesis, a theory has withstood extensive testing and scrutiny, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding a particular phenomenon.
- Explanatory Power: Theories explain a wide range of phenomena and observations.
- Predictive Capability: They can predict future observations and experiments accurately.
- Consistency: The components of a theory are internally consistent and align with existing scientific knowledge.
The theory of evolution explains the biodiversity of life through the processes of natural selection and genetic variation.
Similarities
1. both guide scientific inquiry.
Both hypotheses and theories play integral roles in the scientific method, guiding researchers in the pursuit of knowledge. Hypotheses set the initial direction for experiments, while theories provide overarching frameworks.
2. Subject to Revision
Scientific knowledge is dynamic, and both hypotheses and theories are subject to revision based on new evidence. As more data becomes available, scientists may refine or even discard hypotheses and theories.
Differences
1. level of certainty.
The primary distinction lies in the level of certainty associated with each term. A hypothesis is a tentative explanation that requires testing, while a theory is a well-established explanation supported by a substantial body of evidence.
Hypotheses are narrow in scope, addressing specific questions or problems, while theories have a broader scope, encompassing a wide range of related phenomena.
In conclusion, hypotheses and theories are essential components of the scientific process, each serving distinct roles. Hypotheses initiate investigations, while theories provide robust explanations for observed phenomena. Recognizing the differences and similarities between these concepts is crucial for understanding how scientific knowledge evolves and progresses.
Related References:
- Scientific Method – Wikipedia
- Understanding Science – University of California Museum of Paleontology
- The Difference Between Hypothesis and Theory – ThoughtCo
Share this:
Leave a reply cancel reply, discover more from alchem learning.
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Type your email…
Continue reading
“Theory” vs. “Hypothesis”: What Is The Difference?
Chances are you’ve heard of the TV show The Big Bang Theory . Lots of people love this lighthearted sitcom for its quirky characters and their relationships, but others haven’t even given the series a chance for one reason: they don’t like science and assume the show is boring.
However, it only takes a few seconds with Sheldon and Penny to disprove this assumption and realize that this theory ab0ut The Big Bang Theory is wrong—it isn’t a scientific snoozefest.
But wait: is it a theory or a hypothesis about the show that leads people astray? And would the actual big bang theory— the one that refers to the beginning of the universe—mean the same thing as a big bang hypothesis ?
Let’s take a closer look at theory and hypothesis to nail down what they mean.
What does theory mean?
As a noun, a theory is a group of tested general propositions “commonly regarded as correct, that can be used as principles of explanation and prediction for a class of phenomena .” This is what is known as a scientific theory , which by definition is “an understanding that is based on already tested data or results .” Einstein’s theory of relativity and the theory of evolution are both examples of such tested propositions .
Theory is also defined as a proposed explanation you might make about your own life and observations, and it’s one “whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation .” For example: I’ve got my own theories about why he’s missing his deadlines all the time. This example refers to an idea that has not yet been proven.
There are other uses of the word theory as well.
- In this example, theory is “a body of principles or theorems belonging to one subject.” It can be a branch of science or art that deals with its principles or methods .
- For example: when she started to follow a new parenting theory based on a trendy book, it caused a conflict with her mother, who kept offering differing opinions .
First recorded in 1590–1600, theory originates from the Late Latin theōria , which stems from the Greek theōría. Synonyms for theory include approach , assumption , doctrine , ideology , method , philosophy , speculation , thesis , and understanding .
What does hypothesis mean?
Hypothesis is a noun that means “a proposition , or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation” that describe “some specified group of phenomena.” Sounds familiar to theory , no?
But, unlike a theory , a scientific hypothesis is made before testing is done and isn’t based on results. Instead, it is the basis for further investigation . For example: her working hypothesis is that this new drug also has an unintended effect on the heart, and she is curious what the clinical trials will show .
Hypothesis also refers to “a proposition assumed as a premise in an argument,” or “mere assumption or guess.” For example:
- She decided to drink more water for a week to test out her hypothesis that dehydration was causing her terrible headaches.
- After a night of her spouse’s maddening snoring, she came up with the hypothesis that sleeping on his back was exacerbating the problem.
Hypothesis was first recorded around 1590–1600 and originates from the Greek word hypóthesis (“basis, supposition”). Synonyms for hypothesis include: assumption , conclusion , conjecture , guess , inference , premise , theorem , and thesis .
How to use each
Although theory in terms of science is used to express something based on extensive research and experimentation, typically in everyday life, theory is used more casually to express an educated guess.
So in casual language, theory and hypothesis are more likely to be used interchangeably to express an idea or speculation .
In most everyday uses, theory and hypothesis convey the same meaning. For example:
- Her opinion is just a theory , of course. She’s just guessing.
- Her opinion is just a hypothesis , of course. She’s just guessing.
It’s important to remember that a scientific theory is different. It is based on tested results that support or substantiate it, whereas a hypothesis is formed before the research.
For example:
- His hypothesis for the class science project is that this brand of plant food is better than the rest for helping grass grow.
- After testing his hypothesis , he developed a new theory based on the experiment results: plant food B is actually more effective than plant food A in helping grass grow.
In these examples, theory “doesn’t mean a hunch or a guess,” according to Kenneth R. Miller, a cell biologist at Brown University. “A theory is a system of explanations that ties together a whole bunch of facts. It not only explains those facts, but predicts what you ought to find from other observations and experiments.”
So if you have a concept that is based on substantiated research, it’s a theory .
But if you’re working off of an assumption that you still need to test, it’s a hypothesis .
So remember, first comes a hypothesis , then comes theory . Now who’s ready for a Big Bang Theory marathon?
Now that you’ve theorized and hypothesized through this whole article … keep testing your judgment (Or is it judgement?). Find out the correct spelling here!
Or find out the difference between these two common issues below!
WATCH: "Lethologica" vs. "Lethonomia": What's The Difference?
Go Behind The Words!
- By clicking "Sign Up", you are accepting Dictionary.com Terms & Conditions and Privacy policies.
- Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Commonly Confused
![what are a hypothesis and a theory what are a hypothesis and a theory](https://www.dictionary.com/e/wp-content/themes/dictionary-com/images/temp/ico-arrow.png)
Hobbies & Passions
Word Origins
Current Events
[ goo -gawl ]
![what are a hypothesis and a theory 7ESL](https://7esl.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/7ESL-NEW-LOGO2-1.png)
Hypothesis vs. Theory: Understanding the Differences
“Hypothesis” and “theory” are two terms often used in science, but they have different meanings. Understanding the distinction between these two words can help us make sense of scientific explanations. In this article, we will explore the differences between “hypothesis” and “theory” in a way that is easy to understand. By the end, you’ll have a clearer grasp of these concepts and be able to use them confidently in scientific discussions.
Hypothesis vs. Theory
- A hypothesis is a preliminary assumption to be tested.
- A theory is a well-supported explanation for a broad range of phenomena.
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Hypothesis vs. Theory](https://7esl.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/hypothesis-vs-theory-NG-7ESL-scaled.jpg)
Hypothesis vs. Theory: The Definition
What does hypothesis mean.
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon or a scientific question that can be tested through experimentation or observation. It is an essential part of the scientific method, which involves formulating a hypothesis, conducting experiments to test it, and analyzing the results to draw conclusions.
In scientific research, a hypothesis serves as a tentative solution to a problem or a preliminary explanation for an observed phenomenon. It is based on existing knowledge and is formulated to be tested and potentially refuted through empirical evidence. A well-constructed hypothesis is specific, testable, and falsifiable, meaning that it can be proven false through experimentation or observation.
- Example of a hypothesis : “If a person consumes more vitamin C, then their immune system will be stronger and they will have a lower likelihood of catching a cold.”
What Does Theory Mean?
A theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of evidence, observations, and experimentation. In the scientific context, a theory is more than just a guess or a hypothesis; it is a comprehensive framework that has been rigorously tested and supported by a substantial amount of empirical data.
Scientific theories are developed through the scientific method, which involves formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing the results. As evidence accumulates and supports a particular explanation, it may be elevated to the status of a theory. Importantly, scientific theories are not static or unchangeable; they are subject to modification or even rejection in light of new evidence or more comprehensive explanations.
- Example of a theory: The theory of evolution, which explains how species change over time through the process of natural selection.
Hypothesis vs. Theory: Usage
You employ hypotheses during the early stages of research to develop experiments. For instance, you might hypothesize that a plant given more sunlight will grow faster.
A theory , like the Theory of Evolution, summarizes a group of tested hypotheses and facts to explain a complex set of patterns and behaviors.
For a better understanding of the differences between the two terms, let’s take a look at the table below:
Feature | Hypothesis | Theory |
---|---|---|
Definition | A proposed explanation for a phenomenon | Well-substantiated explanation of some aspect |
Basis | Based on limited evidence and observations | Based on extensive research and evidence |
Testability | Can be tested through experiments and research | Has been extensively tested and supported |
Scope | Narrow in scope, specific to a particular phenomenon | Broader in scope, applicable to multiple phenomena |
Status | Preliminary and subject to change | Established and widely accepted in the scientific community |
Tips to Remember the Differences
- Think of a hypothesis as a “hunch” to be tested.
- View a theory as a “tapestry” of well-tested ideas.
- Use the phrase “hypothesis for testing” and “theory for explaining” to keep them distinct in your mind.
Hypothesis vs. Theory: Examples
Example sentences using hypothesis.
- She formulated a hypothesis to explain the observed pattern in the data.
- The researchers tested their hypothesis through a series of carefully controlled experiments.
- The hypothesis proposed by the scientist led to a new understanding of the chemical reaction.
- It is essential to develop a clear and testable hypothesis before conducting the research.
- The hypothesis was supported by the experimental results, providing valuable insights into the phenomenon.
Example Sentences Using Theory
- Einstein ‘s theory of relativity has fundamentally altered our understanding of space and time.
- Darwin’s theory of natural selection provides a framework for understanding the evolution of species.
- The germ theory of disease is fundamental in developing medical hygiene practices.
- The Big Bang theory is widely accepted as the leading explanation for the origin of the universe.
- The kinetic molecular theory explains the behavior of gases, including their volume and temperature relationships.
Related Confused Words
Hypothesis vs thesis.
A hypothesis is a specific, testable prediction that is proposed before conducting a research study, while a thesis is a statement or theory put forward to be maintained or proved. In essence, a hypothesis is a tentative assumption made in order to draw out and test its logical or empirical consequences, while a thesis is a proposition that is maintained by argument.
Both play distinct roles in the scientific and academic realms, with hypotheses guiding research and theses forming the central point of an argument or discussion.
Theory vs. Law
The primary difference between a scientific theory and a scientific law lies in their scope and function. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of evidence and has undergone rigorous testing and validation. In contrast, a scientific law describes a concise statement or mathematical equation that summarizes a wide variety of observations and experiments, often expressing a fundamental principle of nature.
While a theory provides an overarching framework for understanding a phenomenon, a law describes a specific, observable relationship. Both theory and law are vital components of scientific understanding, with theories offering explanations and laws providing concise descriptions of natural phenomena.
- Ethics vs. Morals
- Latest Posts
![what are a hypothesis and a theory ' src=](https://7esl.com/wp-content/uploads/gravatar/jim-crop.jpg)
- Skillset or Skill Set: Which is Correct? - March 9, 2024
- Vender or Vendor: What Is the Difference? - February 5, 2024
- Take Effect vs. Take Affect: Unraveling the Confusion - February 3, 2024
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Back Home](https://sciencenotes.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/SNCustomizrLogo.png)
- Science Notes Posts
- Contact Science Notes
- Todd Helmenstine Biography
- Anne Helmenstine Biography
- Free Printable Periodic Tables (PDF and PNG)
- Periodic Table Wallpapers
- Interactive Periodic Table
- Periodic Table Posters
- Science Experiments for Kids
- How to Grow Crystals
- Chemistry Projects
- Fire and Flames Projects
- Holiday Science
- Chemistry Problems With Answers
- Physics Problems
- Unit Conversion Example Problems
- Chemistry Worksheets
- Biology Worksheets
- Periodic Table Worksheets
- Physical Science Worksheets
- Science Lab Worksheets
- My Amazon Books
Scientific Theory Definition and Examples
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Scientific Theory Definition](https://sciencenotes.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Scientific-Theory-Definition-1024x683.png)
A scientific theory is a well-established explanation of some aspect of the natural world. Theories come from scientific data and multiple experiments. While it is not possible to prove a theory, a single contrary result using the scientific method can disprove it. In other words, a theory is testable and falsifiable.
![](http://ortec.site/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Examples of Scientific Theories
There are many scientific theory in different disciplines:
- Astronomy : theory of stellar nucleosynthesis , theory of stellar evolution
- Biology : cell theory, theory of evolution, germ theory, dual inheritance theory
- Chemistry : atomic theory, Bronsted Lowry acid-base theory , kinetic molecular theory of gases , Lewis acid-base theory , molecular theory, valence bond theory
- Geology : climate change theory, plate tectonics theory
- Physics : Big Bang theory, perturbation theory, theory of relativity, quantum field theory
Criteria for a Theory
In order for an explanation of the natural world to be a theory, it meets certain criteria:
- A theory is falsifiable. At some point, a theory withstands testing and experimentation using the scientific method.
- A theory is supported by lots of independent evidence.
- A theory explains existing experimental results and predicts outcomes of new experiments at least as well as other theories.
Difference Between a Scientific Theory and Theory
Usually, a scientific theory is just called a theory. However, a theory in science means something different from the way most people use the word. For example, if frogs rain down from the sky, a person might observe the frogs and say, “I have a theory about why that happened.” While that theory might be an explanation, it is not based on multiple observations and experiments. It might not be testable and falsifiable. It’s not a scientific theory (although it could eventually become one).
Value of Disproven Theories
Even though some theories are incorrect, they often retain value.
For example, Arrhenius acid-base theory does not explain the behavior of chemicals lacking hydrogen that behave as acids. The Bronsted Lowry and Lewis theories do a better job of explaining this behavior. Yet, the Arrhenius theory predicts the behavior of most acids and is easier for people to understand.
Another example is the theory of Newtonian mechanics. The theory of relativity is much more inclusive than Newtonian mechanics, which breaks down in certain frames of reference or at speeds close to the speed of light . But, Newtonian mechanics is much simpler to understand and its equations apply to everyday behavior.
Difference Between a Scientific Theory and a Scientific Law
The scientific method leads to the formulation of both scientific theories and laws . Both theories and laws are falsifiable. Both theories and laws help with making predictions about the natural world. However, there is a key difference.
A theory explains why or how something works, while a law describes what happens without explaining it. Often, you see laws written in the form of equations or formulas.
Theories and laws are related, but theories never become laws or vice versa.
Theory vs Hypothesis
A hypothesis is a proposition that is tested via an experiment. A theory results from many, many tested hypotheses.
Theory vs Fact
Theories depend on facts, but the two words mean different things. A fact is an irrefutable piece of evidence or data. Facts never change. A theory, on the other hand, may be modified or disproven.
Difference Between a Theory and a Model
Both theories and models allow a scientist to form a hypothesis and make predictions about future outcomes. However, a theory both describes and explains, while a model only describes. For example, a model of the solar system shows the arrangement of planets and asteroids in a plane around the Sun, but it does not explain how or why they got into their positions.
- Frigg, Roman (2006). “ Scientific Representation and the Semantic View of Theories .” Theoria . 55 (2): 183–206.
- Halvorson, Hans (2012). “What Scientific Theories Could Not Be.” Philosophy of Science . 79 (2): 183–206. doi: 10.1086/664745
- McComas, William F. (December 30, 2013). The Language of Science Education: An Expanded Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts in Science Teaching and Learning . Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-94-6209-497-0.
- National Academy of Sciences (US) (1999). Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences (2nd ed.). National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6024 ISBN 978-0-309-06406-4.
- Suppe, Frederick (1998). “Understanding Scientific Theories: An Assessment of Developments, 1969–1998.” Philosophy of Science . 67: S102–S115. doi: 10.1086/392812
Related Posts
- Key Differences
Know the Differences & Comparisons
Difference Between Hypothesis and Theory
![what are a hypothesis and a theory hypothesis vs theory](https://keydifferences.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/hypothesis-vs-theory1.jpg)
The term ‘hypothesis’ is often contrasted with the term theory which implies an idea, typically proven, which aims at explaining facts and events. Both hypothesis and theory are important components of developing an approach, but these are not same. There exist a fine line of difference between hypothesis and theory, discussed in this article, have a look.
Content: Hypothesis Vs Theory
Comparison chart.
Basis for Comparison | Hypothesis | Theory |
---|---|---|
Meaning | An educated guess, based on certain data, as an inception for further research or investigation is called hypothesis. | Theory is a well substantiated explanation of natural phenomena, which is continuously validated through experimentation and observation. |
Based on | Limited data | Wide range of data |
Testing & Proving | It is not scientifically tested and proven. | It is scientifically tested and proven. |
Relies on | Projection or possibility. | Evidence and verification. |
Result | Uncertain | Certain |
Relationship | Outcome of theory. | Formulated through hypothesis. |
Definition of Hypothesis
An unproven statement or a mere assumption to be proved or disproved, about a factor, on which the researcher is interested, is called a hypothesis. It is a tentative statement, which is concerned with the relationship between two or more phenomena, as specified by the theoretical framework. The hypothesis has to go through a test, to determine its validity.
In other words, the hypothesis is a predictive statement, which can be objectively verified and tested through scientific methods, and relates the independent factor to the dependent one. To a researcher, a hypothesis is more like a question which he intends to resolve. The salient features of hypothesis are:
- It must be clear and precise or else the reliability of the inferences drawn will be questioned.
- It can be put to the test.
- If the hypothesis is relational, it should state the relationship between independent and dependent variables.
- The hypothesis should be open and responsive to testing within the stipulated time.
- It should be limited in scope and must be clearly defined.
Definition of Theory
An idea or a broad range of ideas that are assumed to be true, which aims at explaining cause and effect relationship between multiple observed phenomena. It is based on hypothesis, which after a thorough analysis and continuous testing and confirmation through observation and experiments, becomes a theory. As it is backed by evidence, it is scientifically proven.
Just like hypothesis, theories can also be accepted or rejected. As more and more information is gathered on the subject, theories are modified accordingly, to increase the accuracy of prediction over time.
Key Differences Between Hypothesis and Theory
The points given below are vital, so far as the difference between hypothesis and theory is concerned:
- Hypothesis refers to a supposition, based on few pieces of evidence, as an inception of further research or investigation. A theory is a well-affirmed explanation of natural phenomena, which is frequently validated through experimentation and observation.
- While the hypothesis is based on a little amount of data, the theory is based on a wide set of data.
- The hypothesis is an unproven statement; that can be tested. On the other hand, the theory is a scientifically tested and proven explanation of fact or event.
- Hypothesis relies on suggestions, prediction, possibility or projects whereas a theory is supported by evidence and is verified.
- The hypothesis may or may not be proved true, so the result is uncertain. On the contrary, the theory is one, that is assumed to be true and so its result is certain.
- Hypothesis and theory are two levels of the scientific method, i.e. theory follows hypothesis and the basis for research is hypothesis whose outcome is a theory.
Both hypothesis and theory are testable and falsifiable. When a hypothesis is proved true, by passing all critical tests and analysis, it becomes a theory. So, the hypothesis is very different from theory, as the former is something unproven but the latter is a proven and tested statement.
You Might Also Like:
![what are a hypothesis and a theory](https://keydifferences.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/null-vs-alternative-hypothesis-thumbnail-180x75.jpg)
BELLENS MOTEBEJANE says
July 15, 2019 at 2:31 pm
AMAIZING !WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEORY AND LAW?
February 17, 2022 at 3:47 am
Thanks, I’m finally clear on this for the first time in my life of 65 years
Curtis Le Gendre says
September 14, 2022 at 8:02 am
Great Information
Kenneth says
November 19, 2022 at 2:10 am
I was looking for some takes on this topic, and I found your article quite informative. It has given me a fresh perspective on the topic tackled. Thanks!
Stefanie Banis says
February 9, 2024 at 6:35 pm
Very informative! Thank you! I understand the difference much better now!
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Pediaa.Com](https://pediaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/logo_new.png)
Home » Education » Difference Between Hypothesis and Theory
Difference Between Hypothesis and Theory
Main difference – hypothesis vs theory.
Hypothesis and theory are two words that are often used in the field of science and research. Although these two words have somewhat similar meanings, there is a fundamental difference between hypothesis and theory. Hypothesis is a suggested explanation to explain some phenomenon, and is based on limited data. Theory, on the other hand, is a set of ideas that is intended to explain facts or events; they are based on concrete evidence. This is the main difference between hypothesis and theory.
This article explains,
1. What is a Hypothesis? – Definitions and Features
2. What is a Theory? – Definitions and Features
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Difference Between Hypothesis and Theory - Hypothesis vs Theory Comparison Summary](https://i0.wp.com/pediaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Difference-Between-Hypothesis-and-Theory-infographic.png?resize=450%2C684)
What is a Hypothesis
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation based on some evidence. According to the Oxford dictionary, hypothesis is “a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation” and Merriam-Webster dictionary defines it as “an idea or theory that is not proven but that leads to further study or discussion.”
However, a hypothesis is not scientifically tested or proven; it is a logical assumption based on the available evidence. A hypothesis can be accurate or inaccurate. Once the hypothesis is scientifically tested and proven, it becomes a theory.
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Main Difference - Hypothesis vs Theory](https://i0.wp.com/pediaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Difference-Between-Hypothesis-and-Theory-1.jpg?resize=550%2C471)
The hypothesis of Andreas Cellarius, showing the planetary motions in eccentric and epicyclical orbits.
What is a Theory
Theory is an idea or set of ideas that is intended to explain facts or events. A theory is formulated after in-depth research analysis. It is always proven scientifically with evidence. The Oxford dictionary defines theory as “supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained.”
As mentioned above, a theory is usually formulated from a hypothesis. Once a hypothesis is tested and proven, it is accepted as a theory. Copernicus’ Heliocentric theory, Darwin’s theory of evolution, quantum theory, special relativity theory, are examples of are some important scientific theories.
A theory can be used to understand, explain and make predictions over a concept. However, theories can be proven to be wrong as well, depending on the proof. However, theoretical knowledge is important in understanding different concepts and situations.
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Difference Between Hypothesis and Theory](https://i0.wp.com/pediaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Difference-Between-Hypothesis-and-Theory-2.png?resize=495%2C505)
Special Theory of Relativity
Definition
Hypothesis is a proposed explanation for some phenomenon based on limited evidence.
Theory is an idea or set of ideas that is intended to explain facts or events.
Testing and Proof
Hypothesis is not scientifically tested or proven.
Theory is scientifically tested and proven.
Hypothesis is based on limited data.
Theory is based on a wide range of data.
Interdependence
Hypothesis can lead to a theory.
Theory can be formulated through a hypothesis.
Image Courtesy:
“Cellarius Harmonia Macrocosmica – Hypothesis Ptolemaica” By Andreas Cellarius – (Public Domain) via Commons Wikimedia
“World line” By SVG version: K. Aainsqatsi at en.wikipediaOriginal PNG version: Stib at en.wikipedia – Transferred from en.wikipedia.(Original text : self-made) (CC BY-SA 3.0) via Commons Wikimedia
About the Author: Hasa
Hasanthi is a seasoned content writer and editor with over 8 years of experience. Armed with a BA degree in English and a knack for digital marketing, she explores her passions for literature, history, culture, and food through her engaging and informative writing.
You May Also Like These
Theories, Hypotheses, and Laws: Definitions, examples, and their roles in science
by Anthony Carpi, Ph.D., Anne E. Egger, Ph.D.
Listen to this reading
Did you know that the idea of evolution had been part of Western thought for more than 2,000 years before Charles Darwin was born? Like many theories, the theory of evolution was the result of the work of many different scientists working in different disciplines over a period of time.
A scientific theory is an explanation inferred from multiple lines of evidence for some broad aspect of the natural world and is logical, testable, and predictive.
As new evidence comes to light, or new interpretations of existing data are proposed, theories may be revised and even change; however, they are not tenuous or speculative.
A scientific hypothesis is an inferred explanation of an observation or research finding; while more exploratory in nature than a theory, it is based on existing scientific knowledge.
A scientific law is an expression of a mathematical or descriptive relationship observed in nature.
Imagine yourself shopping in a grocery store with a good friend who happens to be a chemist. Struggling to choose between the many different types of tomatoes in front of you, you pick one up, turn to your friend, and ask her if she thinks the tomato is organic . Your friend simply chuckles and replies, "Of course it's organic!" without even looking at how the fruit was grown. Why the amused reaction? Your friend is highlighting a simple difference in vocabulary. To a chemist, the term organic refers to any compound in which hydrogen is bonded to carbon. Tomatoes (like all plants) are abundant in organic compounds – thus your friend's laughter. In modern agriculture, however, organic has come to mean food items grown or raised without the use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, or other additives.
So who is correct? You both are. Both uses of the word are correct, though they mean different things in different contexts. There are, of course, lots of words that have more than one meaning (like bat , for example), but multiple meanings can be especially confusing when two meanings convey very different ideas and are specific to one field of study.
- Scientific theories
The term theory also has two meanings, and this double meaning often leads to confusion. In common language, the term theory generally refers to speculation or a hunch or guess. You might have a theory about why your favorite sports team isn't playing well, or who ate the last cookie from the cookie jar. But these theories do not fit the scientific use of the term. In science, a theory is a well-substantiated and comprehensive set of ideas that explains a phenomenon in nature. A scientific theory is based on large amounts of data and observations that have been collected over time. Scientific theories can be tested and refined by additional research , and they allow scientists to make predictions. Though you may be correct in your hunch, your cookie jar conjecture doesn't fit this more rigorous definition.
All scientific disciplines have well-established, fundamental theories . For example, atomic theory describes the nature of matter and is supported by multiple lines of evidence from the way substances behave and react in the world around us (see our series on Atomic Theory ). Plate tectonic theory describes the large scale movement of the outer layer of the Earth and is supported by evidence from studies about earthquakes , magnetic properties of the rocks that make up the seafloor , and the distribution of volcanoes on Earth (see our series on Plate Tectonic Theory ). The theory of evolution by natural selection , which describes the mechanism by which inherited traits that affect survivability or reproductive success can cause changes in living organisms over generations , is supported by extensive studies of DNA , fossils , and other types of scientific evidence (see our Charles Darwin series for more information). Each of these major theories guides and informs modern research in those fields, integrating a broad, comprehensive set of ideas.
So how are these fundamental theories developed, and why are they considered so well supported? Let's take a closer look at some of the data and research supporting the theory of natural selection to better see how a theory develops.
Comprehension Checkpoint
- The development of a scientific theory: Evolution and natural selection
The theory of evolution by natural selection is sometimes maligned as Charles Darwin 's speculation on the origin of modern life forms. However, evolutionary theory is not speculation. While Darwin is rightly credited with first articulating the theory of natural selection, his ideas built on more than a century of scientific research that came before him, and are supported by over a century and a half of research since.
- The Fixity Notion: Linnaeus
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Figure 1: Cover of the 1760 edition of Systema Naturae.](https://www.visionlearning.com/img/library/modules/mid177/Image/VLObject-4839-091019111003.jpg)
Figure 1: Cover of the 1760 edition of Systema Naturae .
Research about the origins and diversity of life proliferated in the 18th and 19th centuries. Carolus Linnaeus , a Swedish botanist and the father of modern taxonomy (see our module Taxonomy I for more information), was a devout Christian who believed in the concept of Fixity of Species , an idea based on the biblical story of creation. The Fixity of Species concept said that each species is based on an ideal form that has not changed over time. In the early stages of his career, Linnaeus traveled extensively and collected data on the structural similarities and differences between different species of plants. Noting that some very different plants had similar structures, he began to piece together his landmark work, Systema Naturae, in 1735 (Figure 1). In Systema , Linnaeus classified organisms into related groups based on similarities in their physical features. He developed a hierarchical classification system , even drawing relationships between seemingly disparate species (for example, humans, orangutans, and chimpanzees) based on the physical similarities that he observed between these organisms. Linnaeus did not explicitly discuss change in organisms or propose a reason for his hierarchy, but by grouping organisms based on physical characteristics, he suggested that species are related, unintentionally challenging the Fixity notion that each species is created in a unique, ideal form.
- The age of Earth: Leclerc and Hutton
Also in the early 1700s, Georges-Louis Leclerc, a French naturalist, and James Hutton , a Scottish geologist, began to develop new ideas about the age of the Earth. At the time, many people thought of the Earth as 6,000 years old, based on a strict interpretation of the events detailed in the Christian Old Testament by the influential Scottish Archbishop Ussher. By observing other planets and comets in the solar system , Leclerc hypothesized that Earth began as a hot, fiery ball of molten rock, mostly consisting of iron. Using the cooling rate of iron, Leclerc calculated that Earth must therefore be at least 70,000 years old in order to have reached its present temperature.
Hutton approached the same topic from a different perspective, gathering observations of the relationships between different rock formations and the rates of modern geological processes near his home in Scotland. He recognized that the relatively slow processes of erosion and sedimentation could not create all of the exposed rock layers in only a few thousand years (see our module The Rock Cycle ). Based on his extensive collection of data (just one of his many publications ran to 2,138 pages), Hutton suggested that the Earth was far older than human history – hundreds of millions of years old.
While we now know that both Leclerc and Hutton significantly underestimated the age of the Earth (by about 4 billion years), their work shattered long-held beliefs and opened a window into research on how life can change over these very long timescales.
- Fossil studies lead to the development of a theory of evolution: Cuvier
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Figure 2: Illustration of an Indian elephant jaw and a mammoth jaw from Cuvier's 1796 paper.](https://www.visionlearning.com/img/library/modules/mid177/Image/VLObject-4840-091019111018.jpg)
Figure 2: Illustration of an Indian elephant jaw and a mammoth jaw from Cuvier's 1796 paper.
With the age of Earth now extended by Leclerc and Hutton, more researchers began to turn their attention to studying past life. Fossils are the main way to study past life forms, and several key studies on fossils helped in the development of a theory of evolution . In 1795, Georges Cuvier began to work at the National Museum in Paris as a naturalist and anatomist. Through his work, Cuvier became interested in fossils found near Paris, which some claimed were the remains of the elephants that Hannibal rode over the Alps when he invaded Rome in 218 BCE . In studying both the fossils and living species , Cuvier documented different patterns in the dental structure and number of teeth between the fossils and modern elephants (Figure 2) (Horner, 1843). Based on these data , Cuvier hypothesized that the fossil remains were not left by Hannibal, but were from a distinct species of animal that once roamed through Europe and had gone extinct thousands of years earlier: the mammoth. The concept of species extinction had been discussed by a few individuals before Cuvier, but it was in direct opposition to the Fixity of Species concept – if every organism were based on a perfectly adapted, ideal form, how could any cease to exist? That would suggest it was no longer ideal.
While his work provided critical evidence of extinction , a key component of evolution , Cuvier was highly critical of the idea that species could change over time. As a result of his extensive studies of animal anatomy, Cuvier had developed a holistic view of organisms , stating that the
number, direction, and shape of the bones that compose each part of an animal's body are always in a necessary relation to all the other parts, in such a way that ... one can infer the whole from any one of them ...
In other words, Cuvier viewed each part of an organism as a unique, essential component of the whole organism. If one part were to change, he believed, the organism could not survive. His skepticism about the ability of organisms to change led him to criticize the whole idea of evolution , and his prominence in France as a scientist played a large role in discouraging the acceptance of the idea in the scientific community.
- Studies of invertebrates support a theory of change in species: Lamarck
Jean Baptiste Lamarck, a contemporary of Cuvier's at the National Museum in Paris, studied invertebrates like insects and worms. As Lamarck worked through the museum's large collection of invertebrates, he was impressed by the number and variety of organisms . He became convinced that organisms could, in fact, change through time, stating that
... time and favorable conditions are the two principal means which nature has employed in giving existence to all her productions. We know that for her time has no limit, and that consequently she always has it at her disposal.
This was a radical departure from both the fixity concept and Cuvier's ideas, and it built on the long timescale that geologists had recently established. Lamarck proposed that changes that occurred during an organism 's lifetime could be passed on to their offspring, suggesting, for example, that a body builder's muscles would be inherited by their children.
As it turned out, the mechanism by which Lamarck proposed that organisms change over time was wrong, and he is now often referred to disparagingly for his "inheritance of acquired characteristics" idea. Yet despite the fact that some of his ideas were discredited, Lamarck established a support for evolutionary theory that others would build on and improve.
- Rock layers as evidence for evolution: Smith
In the early 1800s, a British geologist and canal surveyor named William Smith added another component to the accumulating evidence for evolution . Smith observed that rock layers exposed in different parts of England bore similarities to one another: These layers (or strata) were arranged in a predictable order, and each layer contained distinct groups of fossils . From this series of observations , he developed a hypothesis that specific groups of animals followed one another in a definite sequence through Earth's history, and this sequence could be seen in the rock layers. Smith's hypothesis was based on his knowledge of geological principles , including the Law of Superposition.
The Law of Superposition states that sediments are deposited in a time sequence, with the oldest sediments deposited first, or at the bottom, and newer layers deposited on top. The concept was first expressed by the Persian scientist Avicenna in the 11th century, but was popularized by the Danish scientist Nicolas Steno in the 17th century. Note that the law does not state how sediments are deposited; it simply describes the relationship between the ages of deposited sediments.
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Figure 3: Engraving from William Smith's 1815 monograph on identifying strata by fossils.](https://www.visionlearning.com/img/library/modules/mid177/Image/VLObject-4841-091019111026.jpg)
Figure 3: Engraving from William Smith's 1815 monograph on identifying strata by fossils.
Smith backed up his hypothesis with extensive drawings of fossils uncovered during his research (Figure 3), thus allowing other scientists to confirm or dispute his findings. His hypothesis has, in fact, been confirmed by many other scientists and has come to be referred to as the Law of Faunal Succession. His work was critical to the formation of evolutionary theory as it not only confirmed Cuvier's work that organisms have gone extinct , but it also showed that the appearance of life does not date to the birth of the planet. Instead, the fossil record preserves a timeline of the appearance and disappearance of different organisms in the past, and in doing so offers evidence for change in organisms over time.
- The theory of evolution by natural selection: Darwin and Wallace
It was into this world that Charles Darwin entered: Linnaeus had developed a taxonomy of organisms based on their physical relationships, Leclerc and Hutton demonstrated that there was sufficient time in Earth's history for organisms to change, Cuvier showed that species of organisms have gone extinct , Lamarck proposed that organisms change over time, and Smith established a timeline of the appearance and disappearance of different organisms in the geological record .
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Figure 4: Title page of the 1859 Murray edition of the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin.](https://www.visionlearning.com/img/library/modules/mid177/Image/VLObject-4842-091019111029.jpg)
Figure 4: Title page of the 1859 Murray edition of the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin.
Charles Darwin collected data during his work as a naturalist on the HMS Beagle starting in 1831. He took extensive notes on the geology of the places he visited; he made a major find of fossils of extinct animals in Patagonia and identified an extinct giant ground sloth named Megatherium . He experienced an earthquake in Chile that stranded beds of living mussels above water, where they would be preserved for years to come.
Perhaps most famously, he conducted extensive studies of animals on the Galápagos Islands, noting subtle differences in species of mockingbird, tortoise, and finch that were isolated on different islands with different environmental conditions. These subtle differences made the animals highly adapted to their environments .
This broad spectrum of data led Darwin to propose an idea about how organisms change "by means of natural selection" (Figure 4). But this idea was not based only on his work, it was also based on the accumulation of evidence and ideas of many others before him. Because his proposal encompassed and explained many different lines of evidence and previous work, they formed the basis of a new and robust scientific theory regarding change in organisms – the theory of evolution by natural selection .
Darwin's ideas were grounded in evidence and data so compelling that if he had not conceived them, someone else would have. In fact, someone else did. Between 1858 and 1859, Alfred Russel Wallace , a British naturalist, wrote a series of letters to Darwin that independently proposed natural selection as the means for evolutionary change. The letters were presented to the Linnean Society of London, a prominent scientific society at the time (see our module on Scientific Institutions and Societies ). This long chain of research highlights that theories are not just the work of one individual. At the same time, however, it often takes the insight and creativity of individuals to put together all of the pieces and propose a new theory . Both Darwin and Wallace were experienced naturalists who were familiar with the work of others. While all of the work leading up to 1830 contributed to the theory of evolution , Darwin's and Wallace's theory changed the way that future research was focused by presenting a comprehensive, well-substantiated set of ideas, thus becoming a fundamental theory of biological research.
- Expanding, testing, and refining scientific theories
- Genetics and evolution: Mendel and Dobzhansky
Since Darwin and Wallace first published their ideas, extensive research has tested and expanded the theory of evolution by natural selection . Darwin had no concept of genes or DNA or the mechanism by which characteristics were inherited within a species . A contemporary of Darwin's, the Austrian monk Gregor Mendel , first presented his own landmark study, Experiments in Plant Hybridization, in 1865 in which he provided the basic patterns of genetic inheritance , describing which characteristics (and evolutionary changes) can be passed on in organisms (see our Genetics I module for more information). Still, it wasn't until much later that a "gene" was defined as the heritable unit.
In 1937, the Ukrainian born geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky published Genetics and the Origin of Species , a seminal work in which he described genes themselves and demonstrated that it is through mutations in genes that change occurs. The work defined evolution as "a change in the frequency of an allele within a gene pool" ( Dobzhansky, 1982 ). These studies and others in the field of genetics have added to Darwin's work, expanding the scope of the theory .
- Evolution under a microscope: Lenski
More recently, Dr. Richard Lenski, a scientist at Michigan State University, isolated a single Escherichia coli bacterium in 1989 as the first step of the longest running experimental test of evolutionary theory to date – a true test meant to replicate evolution and natural selection in the lab.
After the single microbe had multiplied, Lenski isolated the offspring into 12 different strains , each in their own glucose-supplied culture, predicting that the genetic make-up of each strain would change over time to become more adapted to their specific culture as predicted by evolutionary theory . These 12 lines have been nurtured for over 40,000 bacterial generations (luckily bacterial generations are much shorter than human generations) and exposed to different selective pressures such as heat , cold, antibiotics, and infection with other microorganisms. Lenski and colleagues have studied dozens of aspects of evolutionary theory with these genetically isolated populations . In 1999, they published a paper that demonstrated that random genetic mutations were common within the populations and highly diverse across different individual bacteria . However, "pivotal" mutations that are associated with beneficial changes in the group are shared by all descendants in a population and are much rarer than random mutations, as predicted by the theory of evolution by natural selection (Papadopoulos et al., 1999).
- Punctuated equilibrium: Gould and Eldredge
While established scientific theories like evolution have a wealth of research and evidence supporting them, this does not mean that they cannot be refined as new information or new perspectives on existing data become available. For example, in 1972, biologist Stephen Jay Gould and paleontologist Niles Eldredge took a fresh look at the existing data regarding the timing by which evolutionary change takes place. Gould and Eldredge did not set out to challenge the theory of evolution; rather they used it as a guiding principle and asked more specific questions to add detail and nuance to the theory. This is true of all theories in science: they provide a framework for additional research. At the time, many biologists viewed evolution as occurring gradually, causing small incremental changes in organisms at a relatively steady rate. The idea is referred to as phyletic gradualism , and is rooted in the geological concept of uniformitarianism . After reexamining the available data, Gould and Eldredge came to a different explanation, suggesting that evolution consists of long periods of stability that are punctuated by occasional instances of dramatic change – a process they called punctuated equilibrium .
Like Darwin before them, their proposal is rooted in evidence and research on evolutionary change, and has been supported by multiple lines of evidence. In fact, punctuated equilibrium is now considered its own theory in evolutionary biology. Punctuated equilibrium is not as broad of a theory as natural selection . In science, some theories are broad and overarching of many concepts, such as the theory of evolution by natural selection; others focus on concepts at a smaller, or more targeted, scale such as punctuated equilibrium. And punctuated equilibrium does not challenge or weaken the concept of natural selection; rather, it represents a change in our understanding of the timing by which change occurs in organisms , and a theory within a theory. The theory of evolution by natural selection now includes both gradualism and punctuated equilibrium to describe the rate at which change proceeds.
- Hypotheses and laws: Other scientific concepts
One of the challenges in understanding scientific terms like theory is that there is not a precise definition even within the scientific community. Some scientists debate over whether certain proposals merit designation as a hypothesis or theory , and others mistakenly use the terms interchangeably. But there are differences in these terms. A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon. Hypotheses , just like theories , are based on observations from research . For example, LeClerc did not hypothesize that Earth had cooled from a molten ball of iron as a random guess; rather, he developed this hypothesis based on his observations of information from meteorites.
A scientist often proposes a hypothesis before research confirms it as a way of predicting the outcome of study to help better define the parameters of the research. LeClerc's hypothesis allowed him to use known parameters (the cooling rate of iron) to do additional work. A key component of a formal scientific hypothesis is that it is testable and falsifiable. For example, when Richard Lenski first isolated his 12 strains of bacteria , he likely hypothesized that random mutations would cause differences to appear within a period of time in the different strains of bacteria. But when a hypothesis is generated in science, a scientist will also make an alternative hypothesis , an explanation that explains a study if the data do not support the original hypothesis. If the different strains of bacteria in Lenski's work did not diverge over the indicated period of time, perhaps the rate of mutation was slower than first thought.
So you might ask, if theories are so well supported, do they eventually become laws? The answer is no – not because they aren't well-supported, but because theories and laws are two very different things. Laws describe phenomena, often mathematically. Theories, however, explain phenomena. For example, in 1687 Isaac Newton proposed a Theory of Gravitation, describing gravity as a force of attraction between two objects. As part of this theory, Newton developed a Law of Universal Gravitation that explains how this force operates. This law states that the force of gravity between two objects is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between those objects. Newton 's Law does not explain why this is true, but it describes how gravity functions (see our Gravity: Newtonian Relationships module for more detail). In 1916, Albert Einstein developed his theory of general relativity to explain the mechanism by which gravity has its effect. Einstein's work challenges Newton's theory, and has been found after extensive testing and research to more accurately describe the phenomenon of gravity. While Einstein's work has replaced Newton's as the dominant explanation of gravity in modern science, Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation is still used as it reasonably (and more simply) describes the force of gravity under many conditions. Similarly, the Law of Faunal Succession developed by William Smith does not explain why organisms follow each other in distinct, predictable ways in the rock layers, but it accurately describes the phenomenon.
Theories, hypotheses , and laws drive scientific progress
Theories, hypotheses , and laws are not simply important components of science, they drive scientific progress. For example, evolutionary biology now stands as a distinct field of science that focuses on the origins and descent of species . Geologists now rely on plate tectonics as a conceptual model and guiding theory when they are studying processes at work in Earth's crust . And physicists refer to atomic theory when they are predicting the existence of subatomic particles yet to be discovered. This does not mean that science is "finished," or that all of the important theories have been discovered already. Like evolution , progress in science happens both gradually and in short, dramatic bursts. Both types of progress are critical for creating a robust knowledge base with data as the foundation and scientific theories giving structure to that knowledge.
Table of Contents
- Theories, hypotheses, and laws drive scientific progress
Activate glossary term highlighting to easily identify key terms within the module. Once highlighted, you can click on these terms to view their definitions.
Activate NGSS annotations to easily identify NGSS standards within the module. Once highlighted, you can click on them to view these standards.
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Encyclopedia Britannica](https://cdn.britannica.com/mendel/eb-logo/MendelNewThistleLogo.png)
- History & Society
- Science & Tech
- Biographies
- Animals & Nature
- Geography & Travel
- Arts & Culture
- Games & Quizzes
- On This Day
- One Good Fact
- New Articles
- Lifestyles & Social Issues
- Philosophy & Religion
- Politics, Law & Government
- World History
- Health & Medicine
- Browse Biographies
- Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
- Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
- Environment
- Fossils & Geologic Time
- Entertainment & Pop Culture
- Sports & Recreation
- Visual Arts
- Demystified
- Image Galleries
- Infographics
- Top Questions
- Britannica Kids
- Saving Earth
- Space Next 50
- Student Center
Discussion with Kara Rogers of how the scientific model is used to test a hypothesis or represent a theory
![what are a hypothesis and a theory Discussion with Kara Rogers of how the scientific model is used to test a hypothesis or represent a theory](https://cdn.britannica.com/42/154842-138-D063918E/Kara-Rogers-difference-Encyclopaedia-Britannica-theory-hypothesis.jpg)
Hypothesis, Model, Theory, and Law
Dorling Kindersley / Getty Images
- Physics Laws, Concepts, and Principles
- Quantum Physics
- Important Physicists
- Thermodynamics
- Cosmology & Astrophysics
- Weather & Climate
![what are a hypothesis and a theory what are a hypothesis and a theory](https://www.thoughtco.com/thmb/pl3cLcXeT2OgptOg3ly2mVDsw10=/200x200/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(webp)/AZJFaceShot-56a72b155f9b58b7d0e783fa.jpg)
- M.S., Mathematics Education, Indiana University
- B.A., Physics, Wabash College
In common usage, the words hypothesis, model, theory, and law have different interpretations and are at times used without precision, but in science they have very exact meanings.
Perhaps the most difficult and intriguing step is the development of a specific, testable hypothesis. A useful hypothesis enables predictions by applying deductive reasoning, often in the form of mathematical analysis. It is a limited statement regarding the cause and effect in a specific situation, which can be tested by experimentation and observation or by statistical analysis of the probabilities from the data obtained. The outcome of the test hypothesis should be currently unknown, so that the results can provide useful data regarding the validity of the hypothesis.
Sometimes a hypothesis is developed that must wait for new knowledge or technology to be testable. The concept of atoms was proposed by the ancient Greeks , who had no means of testing it. Centuries later, when more knowledge became available, the hypothesis gained support and was eventually accepted by the scientific community, though it has had to be amended many times over the year. Atoms are not indivisible, as the Greeks supposed.
A model is used for situations when it is known that the hypothesis has a limitation on its validity. The Bohr model of the atom , for example, depicts electrons circling the atomic nucleus in a fashion similar to planets in the solar system. This model is useful in determining the energies of the quantum states of the electron in the simple hydrogen atom, but it is by no means represents the true nature of the atom. Scientists (and science students) often use such idealized models to get an initial grasp on analyzing complex situations.
Theory and Law
A scientific theory or law represents a hypothesis (or group of related hypotheses) which has been confirmed through repeated testing, almost always conducted over a span of many years. Generally, a theory is an explanation for a set of related phenomena, like the theory of evolution or the big bang theory .
The word "law" is often invoked in reference to a specific mathematical equation that relates the different elements within a theory. Pascal's Law refers an equation that describes differences in pressure based on height. In the overall theory of universal gravitation developed by Sir Isaac Newton , the key equation that describes the gravitational attraction between two objects is called the law of gravity .
These days, physicists rarely apply the word "law" to their ideas. In part, this is because so many of the previous "laws of nature" were found to be not so much laws as guidelines, that work well within certain parameters but not within others.
Scientific Paradigms
Once a scientific theory is established, it is very hard to get the scientific community to discard it. In physics, the concept of ether as a medium for light wave transmission ran into serious opposition in the late 1800s, but it was not disregarded until the early 1900s, when Albert Einstein proposed alternate explanations for the wave nature of light that did not rely upon a medium for transmission.
The science philosopher Thomas Kuhn developed the term scientific paradigm to explain the working set of theories under which science operates. He did extensive work on the scientific revolutions that take place when one paradigm is overturned in favor of a new set of theories. His work suggests that the very nature of science changes when these paradigms are significantly different. The nature of physics prior to relativity and quantum mechanics is fundamentally different from that after their discovery, just as biology prior to Darwin’s Theory of Evolution is fundamentally different from the biology that followed it. The very nature of the inquiry changes.
One consequence of the scientific method is to try to maintain consistency in the inquiry when these revolutions occur and to avoid attempts to overthrow existing paradigms on ideological grounds.
Occam’s Razor
One principle of note in regards to the scientific method is Occam’s Razor (alternately spelled Ockham's Razor), which is named after the 14th century English logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham. Occam did not create the concept—the work of Thomas Aquinas and even Aristotle referred to some form of it. The name was first attributed to him (to our knowledge) in the 1800s, indicating that he must have espoused the philosophy enough that his name became associated with it.
The Razor is often stated in Latin as:
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
or, translated to English:
entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity
Occam's Razor indicates that the most simple explanation that fits the available data is the one which is preferable. Assuming that two hypotheses presented have equal predictive power, the one which makes the fewest assumptions and hypothetical entities takes precedence. This appeal to simplicity has been adopted by most of science, and is invoked in this popular quote by Albert Einstein:
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
It is significant to note that Occam's Razor does not prove that the simpler hypothesis is, indeed, the true explanation of how nature behaves. Scientific principles should be as simple as possible, but that's no proof that nature itself is simple.
However, it is generally the case that when a more complex system is at work there is some element of the evidence which doesn't fit the simpler hypothesis, so Occam's Razor is rarely wrong as it deals only with hypotheses of purely equal predictive power. The predictive power is more important than the simplicity.
Edited by Anne Marie Helmenstine, Ph.D.
- The Basics of Physics in Scientific Study
- Kinetic Molecular Theory of Gases
- De Broglie Hypothesis
- An Introduction to Brownian Motion
- The History of Gravity
- History of the Michelson-Morley Experiment
- Newton's Law of Gravity
- Wave Particle Duality and How It Works
- What Is the Boltzmann Brains Hypothesis?
- Five Great Problems in Theoretical Physics
- The Basics of String Theory
- Understanding Cosmology and Its Impact
- Albert Einstein: What Is Unified Field Theory?
- An Idealized Model in Physics
- What Is the Steady-State Theory in Cosmology?
- What Is Model-Dependent Realism?
2024 Theses Doctoral
Towards a Computational Theory of the Brain: The Simplest Neural Models, and a Hypothesis for Language
Mitropolsky, Daniel
Obtaining a computational understanding of the brain is one of the most important problems in basic science. However, the brain is an incredibly complex organ, and neurobiological research has uncovered enormous amounts of detail at almost every level of analysis (the synapse, the neuron, other brain cells, brain circuits, areas, and so on); it is unclear which of these details are conceptually significant to the basic way in which the brain computes. An essential approach to the eventual resolution of this problem is the definition and study of theoretical computational models, based on varying abstractions and inclusions of such details. This thesis defines and studies a family of models, called NEMO, based on a particular set of well-established facts or well-founded assumptions in neuroscience: atomic neural firing, random connectivity, inhibition as a local dynamic firing threshold, and fully local plasticity. This thesis asks: what sort of algorithms are possible in these computational models? To the extent possible, what seem to be the simplest assumptions where interesting computation becomes possible? Additionally, can we find algorithms for cognitive phenomena that, in addition to serving as a "proof of capacity" of the computational model, otherwise reflect what is known about these processes in the brain? The major contributions of this thesis include: 1. The formal definition of the basic-NEMO and NEMO models, with an explication of their neurobiological underpinnings (that is, realism as abstractions of the brain). 2. Algorithms for the creation of neural \emph{assemblies}, or highly dense interconnected subsets of neurons, and various operations manipulating such assemblies, including reciprocal projection, merge, association, disassociation, and pattern completion, all in the basic-NEMO model. Using these operations, we show the Turing-completeness of the NEMO model (with some specific additional assumptions). 3. An algorithm for parsing a small but non-trivial subset of English and Russian (and more generally any regular language) in the NEMO model, with meta-features of the algorithm broadly in line with what is known about language in the brain. 4. An algorithm for parsing a much larger subset of English (and other languages), in particular handling dependent (embedded) clauses, in the NEMO model with some additional memory assumptions. We prove that an abstraction of this algorithm yields a new characterization of the context-free languages. 5. Algorithms for the blocks-world planning task, which involves outputting a sequence of steps to rearrange a stack of cubes in one order into another target order, in the NEMO model. A side consequence of this work is an algorithm for a chaining operation in basic-NEMO. 6. Algorithms for several of the most basic and initial steps in language acquisition in the baby brain. This includes an algorithm for the learning of the simplest, concrete nouns and action verbs (words like "cat" and "jump") from whole sentences in basic-NEMO with a novel representation of word and contextual inputs. Extending the same model, we present an algorithm for an elementary component of syntax, namely learning the word order of 2-constituent intransitive and 3-constituent transitive sentences. These algorithms are very broadly in line with what is known about language in the brain.
- Computer science
- Neurosciences
- Brain--Physiology
- Language acquisition
- Computational linguistics
- Computational neuroscience
- English language
- Russian language
![what are a hypothesis and a theory thumnail for Mitropolsky_columbia_0054D_18727.pdf](https://derivativo-1.library.columbia.edu/iiif/2/ac:j9kd51c5m9/full/!256,256/0/native.jpg)
More About This Work
- DOI Copy DOI to clipboard
Conceptual Theory Art as a Method for Interdisciplinary Research, Hypothesis, and Critical Analysis Both Within and Beyond Traditional Western Social Sciences
10 Pages Posted: 6 Sep 2024
Adam Daley Wilson
Stanford Law School
Date Written: August 01, 2024
This paper researches whether and how Theory Art, an emergent conceptual art form across visual art, music, literature, and other artistic disciplines, might serve as a method for integrating existing methodologies of interdisciplinary research, hypothesis-making, and critical analysis, both in and beyond the traditional social sciences of the West, by creatively blending elements of artistic and philosophical traditions across cultures, thought systems, and time periods, to observe, propose, critique, and preserve human theories, arguments, and narratives, including theories conveyed through spoken-word storytelling. The paper first provides an academic research survey as a foundation to measure the intellectual rigor of Theory Art's emphasis on construction of meaning by the audience-viewer-listener-reader, rather than by the artist-creator alone. The paper then evaluates Theory Art relative to other artistic movements to date. The paper then measures Theory Art in relation to traditional Western social sciences, including economics and other quantitative social sciences, to measure the potential degree and scope of Theory Art's interdisciplinary nature and theoretical foundations. The paper then proposes several observable standards and elements that appear to indicate that Theory Art is a new form of Conceptual Art, including in relation to, and distinct from, traditional Conceptual Art as well as Post-conceptual Art, Post-minimalism, Postmodernism, and Neo-conceptual Art. By integrating a wide survey of relevant cross-cultural researchers and theorists, from multiple societies and time periods, this research paper is a first attempt to analyze Theory Art's substantive elements as an artistic movement. This paper is also a first attempt to measure Theory Art's intellectual and methodological rigor, in order to assess Theory Art as a method for interdisciplinary research, hypothesis-making, and critical analysis of human theories both within and beyond traditional Western social sciences. The paper concludes that Theory Art offers new theory-communication methodologies that have new implications for art, and cultural discourse, not only in Western cultures but all cultures worldwide. Finally, this research paper is intended as a foundation allowing future researchers and scholars to develop hypotheses by which to test not only the rigor of Theory Art itself as an art movement related to Conceptual Art, but also the rigor of any given work that may be made by an artist-creator.
Keywords: Theory Art, Conceptual Art, Art Theory, Art History, Social Sciences, Post-Theory Art, Post-Contemporary Art
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Adam Daley Wilson (Contact Author)
Stanford law school ( email ), do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on ssrn, paper statistics, related ejournals, aesthetics & philosophy of art ejournal.
Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic
Art & Science eJournal
Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic
Visual, Performing & Fine Arts Education eJournal
Art history ejournal.
![](http://ortec.site/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
A hypothesis is an assumption made before any research has been done. It is formed so that it can be tested to see if it might be true. A theory is a principle formed to explain the things already shown in data. Because of the rigors of experiment and control, it is much more likely that a theory will be true than a hypothesis.
See why leading organizations rely on MasterClass for learning & development. Though you may hear the terms "theory" and "hypothesis" used interchangeably, these two scientific terms have drastically different meanings in the world of science.
A hypothesis is either a suggested explanation for an observable phenomenon, or a reasoned prediction of a possible causal correlation among multiple phenomena. In science, a theory is a tested, well-substantiated, unifying explanation for a set of verified, proven factors. A theory is always backed by evidence; a hypothesis is only a suggested possible outcome, and is testable and falsifiable.
A hypothesis is a tentative explanation that requires testing, while a theory is a well-established explanation supported by a substantial body of evidence. 2. Scope. Hypotheses are narrow in scope, addressing specific questions or problems, while theories have a broader scope, encompassing a wide range of related phenomena.
A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it. Therefore, theories can be disproven. Basically, if evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, then the hypothesis can become accepted as a good explanation of a ...
"Theory" vs. "Hypothesis": What Is The Difference?
Hypothesis & theory have one main difference. Use these definitions & examples to explore how these terms differ from each other and similar science terms.
Hypothesis vs Thesis. A hypothesis is a specific, testable prediction that is proposed before conducting a research study, while a thesis is a statement or theory put forward to be maintained or proved. In essence, a hypothesis is a tentative assumption made in order to draw out and test its logical or empirical consequences, while a thesis is ...
hypothesis. science. scientific hypothesis, an idea that proposes a tentative explanation about a phenomenon or a narrow set of phenomena observed in the natural world. The two primary features of a scientific hypothesis are falsifiability and testability, which are reflected in an "If…then" statement summarizing the idea and in the ...
A theory explains why or how something works, while a law describes what happens without explaining it. Often, you see laws written in the form of equations or formulas. Theories and laws are related, but theories never become laws or vice versa. Theory vs Hypothesis. A hypothesis is a proposition that is tested via an experiment.
Hypothesis and theory are two levels of the scientific method, i.e. theory follows hypothesis and the basis for research is hypothesis whose outcome is a theory. Conclusion. Both hypothesis and theory are testable and falsifiable. When a hypothesis is proved true, by passing all critical tests and analysis, it becomes a theory.
Hypothesis is a suggested explanation to explain some phenomenon, and is based on limited data. Theory, on the other hand, is a set of ideas that is intended to explain facts or events; they are based on concrete evidence. This is the main difference between hypothesis and theory. This article explains, 1. What is a Hypothesis?
Some scientists debate over whether certain proposals merit designation as a hypothesis or theory, and others mistakenly use the terms interchangeably. But there are differences in these terms. A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon. Hypotheses, just like theories, are based on observations from research. For ...
A hypothesis is a tentative explanation about an observation that can be tested. It's just a starting point for further investigation. Any one observation usually comes with an array of hypotheses. If you observe that a swan is white, your hypothesis could be that it's painted, or it was bleached by the sun, or its feathers just lack pigment.
Both a theory and hypothesis have a place in the scientific method and their primary difference is when they occur in this type of research. Scientists, researchers and psychologists commonly use theories to guide their studies and develop hypotheses. A theory requires evidence to prove, while a hypothesis guides research and helps to gather ...
A theory is a principle that explains a phenomenon or occurrence, which usually has data to support its use. Theories are well-established explanations that scientists and researchers often accept following results from multiple tests and experiments. Theories typically help describe aspects of the natural world.
A scientific hypothesis is an idea that proposes a tentative explanation for a phenomenon that's been observed. It is both falsifiable and testable. Falsifiability is evident in the if/then statement of the hypothesis, and its testability is evident in its ability to be supported or refuted by scientific observation or experimentation.
A hypothesis is a possible explanation that can be tested. This simple definition needs some further explanation. It says it must have a possible explanation. The hypothesis should apply reasoning ...
A scientific theory or law represents a hypothesis (or group of related hypotheses) which has been confirmed through repeated testing, almost always conducted over a span of many years. Generally, a theory is an explanation for a set of related phenomena, like the theory of evolution or the big bang theory. The word "law" is often invoked in ...
Simulation hypothesis
Towards a Computational Theory of the Brain: The Simplest Neural Models, and a Hypothesis for Language. Mitropolsky, Daniel. Obtaining a computational understanding of the brain is one of the most important problems in basic science. However, the brain is an incredibly complex organ, and neurobiological research has uncovered enormous amounts ...
Abstract. This paper researches whether and how Theory Art, an emergent conceptual art form across visual art, music, literature, and other artistic disciplines, might serve as a method for integrating existing methodologies of interdisciplinary research, hypothesis-making, and critical analysis, both in and beyond the traditional social sciences of the West, by creatively blending elements of ...
Hypothesis testing. We used Bayesian generalized linear multilevel models to explore the relationships between body size, trophic position, and alpha. To test predictions from Hypothesis 1 (Figure 1b), body size was the response variable, and trophic position, alpha, and the interaction between alpha and trophic position were the predictors. To ...