research example pdf

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Starting the research process
• How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates

How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates

Published on October 12, 2022 by Shona McCombes and Tegan George. Revised on November 21, 2023.

A research proposal describes what you will investigate, why it’s important, and how you will conduct your research.

The format of a research proposal varies between fields, but most proposals will contain at least these elements:

Introduction

Literature review.

• Research design

Reference list

While the sections may vary, the overall objective is always the same. A research proposal serves as a blueprint and guide for your research plan, helping you get organized and feel confident in the path forward you choose to take.

Table of contents

Research proposal purpose, research proposal examples, research design and methods, contribution to knowledge, research schedule, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about research proposals.

Academics often have to write research proposals to get funding for their projects. As a student, you might have to write a research proposal as part of a grad school application , or prior to starting your thesis or dissertation .

In addition to helping you figure out what your research can look like, a proposal can also serve to demonstrate why your project is worth pursuing to a funder, educational institution, or supervisor.

Research proposal length

The length of a research proposal can vary quite a bit. A bachelor’s or master’s thesis proposal can be just a few pages, while proposals for PhD dissertations or research funding are usually much longer and more detailed. Your supervisor can help you determine the best length for your work.

One trick to get started is to think of your proposal’s structure as a shorter version of your thesis or dissertation , only without the results , conclusion and discussion sections.

Download our research proposal template

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We’ve included a few for you below.

• Example research proposal #1: “A Conceptual Framework for Scheduling Constraint Management”
• Example research proposal #2: “Medical Students as Mediators of Change in Tobacco Use”

Like your dissertation or thesis, the proposal will usually have a title page that includes:

• The proposed title of your project
• Your supervisor’s name
• Your institution and department

The first part of your proposal is the initial pitch for your project. Make sure it succinctly explains what you want to do and why.

Your introduction should:

• Introduce your topic
• Give necessary background and context
• Outline your  problem statement  and research questions

To guide your introduction , include information about:

• Who could have an interest in the topic (e.g., scientists, policymakers)
• How much is already known about the topic
• What is missing from this current knowledge
• What new insights your research will contribute
• Why you believe this research is worth doing

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

As you get started, it’s important to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the most important research on your topic. A strong literature review  shows your reader that your project has a solid foundation in existing knowledge or theory. It also shows that you’re not simply repeating what other people have already done or said, but rather using existing research as a jumping-off point for your own.

In this section, share exactly how your project will contribute to ongoing conversations in the field by:

• Comparing and contrasting the main theories, methods, and debates
• Examining the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches
• Explaining how will you build on, challenge, or synthesize prior scholarship

Following the literature review, restate your main  objectives . This brings the focus back to your own project. Next, your research design or methodology section will describe your overall approach, and the practical steps you will take to answer your research questions.

To finish your proposal on a strong note, explore the potential implications of your research for your field. Emphasize again what you aim to contribute and why it matters.

For example, your results might have implications for:

• Improving best practices
• Informing policymaking decisions
• Strengthening a theory or model
• Challenging popular or scientific beliefs
• Creating a basis for future research

Last but not least, your research proposal must include correct citations for every source you have used, compiled in a reference list . To create citations quickly and easily, you can use our free APA citation generator .

Some institutions or funders require a detailed timeline of the project, asking you to forecast what you will do at each stage and how long it may take. While not always required, be sure to check the requirements of your project.

Here’s an example schedule to help you get started. You can also download a template at the button below.

Download our research schedule template

If you are applying for research funding, chances are you will have to include a detailed budget. This shows your estimates of how much each part of your project will cost.

Make sure to check what type of costs the funding body will agree to cover. For each item, include:

• Cost : exactly how much money do you need?
• Justification : why is this cost necessary to complete the research?
• Source : how did you calculate the amount?

To determine your budget, think about:

• Travel costs : do you need to go somewhere to collect your data? How will you get there, and how much time will you need? What will you do there (e.g., interviews, archival research)?
• Materials : do you need access to any tools or technologies?
• Help : do you need to hire any research assistants for the project? What will they do, and how much will you pay them?

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

Methodology

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement .

Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.

I will compare …

A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.

Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.

A PhD, which is short for philosophiae doctor (doctor of philosophy in Latin), is the highest university degree that can be obtained. In a PhD, students spend 3–5 years writing a dissertation , which aims to make a significant, original contribution to current knowledge.

A PhD is intended to prepare students for a career as a researcher, whether that be in academia, the public sector, or the private sector.

A master’s is a 1- or 2-year graduate degree that can prepare you for a variety of careers.

All master’s involve graduate-level coursework. Some are research-intensive and intend to prepare students for further study in a PhD; these usually require their students to write a master’s thesis . Others focus on professional training for a specific career.

Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including your own.

Like information literacy , it involves evaluating arguments, identifying and solving problems in an objective and systematic way, and clearly communicating your ideas.

The best way to remember the difference between a research plan and a research proposal is that they have fundamentally different audiences. A research plan helps you, the researcher, organize your thoughts. On the other hand, a dissertation proposal or research proposal aims to convince others (e.g., a supervisor, a funding body, or a dissertation committee) that your research topic is relevant and worthy of being conducted.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. & George, T. (2023, November 21). How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved September 4, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/research-process/research-proposal/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, how to write a problem statement | guide & examples, writing strong research questions | criteria & examples, how to write a literature review | guide, examples, & templates, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

Designing and Proposing Your Research Project

Available formats, also available from.

• Table of contents
• Contributor bios
• Reviews and awards
• Book details
• Supplemental Resources

Designing your own study and writing your research proposal takes time, often more so than conducting the study. This practical, accessible guide walks you through the entire process.

You will learn to identify and narrow your research topic, develop your research question, design your study, and choose appropriate sampling and measurement strategies.

The figures, tables, and exhibits offer a wealth of relatable examples, and students can use the many activities and worksheets to explore and apply concepts, as individuals or in groups.

This book is part of APA's Concise Guides to Conducting Behavioral, Health, and Social Science Research series. Aimed at undergraduate students in research methods courses or others with a lab or research project, each book describes a key stage in the research process. Collectively, these books provide a solid grounding in research from start to finish.

Series Foreword

• Introduction
• Choosing Your Research Question and Hypotheses
• Choosing Your Study's Purpose
• Choosing Whether to Use a Qualitative, Quantitative, or Mixed-Methods Approach
• Understanding Terms for Quantitative Studies: Concepts, Constructs, and Variables
• Choosing Your Design
• Choosing Your Sample
• Planning Your Measurement Strategy for Collecting Data
• Establishing Validity for Quantitative Studies
• Establishing Validity for Qualitative Studies

About the Authors

About the Series Editor

Jennifer Brown Urban, PhD, is a professor in the Department of Family Science and Human Development at Montclair State University, where she also directs the Research on Evaluation and Developmental Systems Science lab.

She is trained as a developmental scientist with specific expertise in youth development and program evaluation. Her scholarship is encapsulated under the umbrella of systems science, including both theoretical approaches and methodologies.

Dr. Urban's most recent research focuses on character development and innovative approaches to program evaluation and planning. She is currently principal investigator on several grant-funded projects. The goals of this work are to build the capacity of youth program practitioners and evaluators to engage in high-quality evaluation of character development programs, to determine the key features of character development programs that promote positive youth development, and to advance the application of character science in multiple contexts to enhance human flourishing across the lifespan.

She uses mixed-method approaches in her own research and has mentored many undergraduate and graduate students in designing and executing applied research projects.

Bradley Matheus van Eeden-Moorefield, PhD, is an associate professor in the Department of Family Science and Human Development at Montclair State University and director of the PhD program.

His research includes a strong social justice commitment to understanding and strengthening marginalized families, with his most recent work focused on stepfamilies headed by same-sex couples. Much of this research focuses on identifying how factors in the social world (e.g., stigma, stereotypes, policy) influence everyday family life and how each influence various indicators of individual (e.g., depression, happiness) and family well-being (stability).

Dr. van Eeden-Moorefield uses various qualitative and quantitative methodologies and has particular expertise in Internet-based methodologies.

He has provided training to various family and childcare practitioners and uses his previous clinical experiences to translate research into practice and practice into research.

The chapters are organized around the choices students need to make, rather than the types of research and issues specific to each type — an important distinguishing feature that sets this book apart from other research methods text…. In the current environment of increasing interdisciplinarity, this text is very useful to students who find themselves coming to social science research from other disciplines, or to students in need of clear guidelines who do not have the time to complete another entire research methods course. — Choice

Urban and van Eeden-Moorefield take the often daunting topic of research methods and make it — dare I say — fun and engaging. Through personal stories and good humor, they demystify the research process and find ways to connect research to everyday life and experiences. This book should be a required supplementary text for every introductory research methods course. —William M. Trochim, PhD Professor, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

The authors use vivid and engaging examples and masterfully crafted exhibits to create an irresistible proposition to students: "You can do excellent research and enjoy doing it!" They creatively help readers understand and make the choices involved in exemplary research. This book is an invaluable asset for students in psychology and in the social and behavioral sciences more generally. —Richard M. Lerner, PhD Bergstrom Chair in Applied Developmental Science and Director, Institute for Applied Research in Youth Development, Tufts University, Medford, MA

This book will help beginning researchers identify a meaningful and testable research question as well as deal with basic choices in designing their study. The accessible text and a host of tables guide readers through key issues in designing and proposing a research project. —Melvin M. Mark, PhD Professor and Head of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Welcome to the supplemental resources for Designing and Proposing Your Research Project . The links below provide copies of many of the worksheets seen throughout the text for ease of use.

We also have included several features referred to, but not discussed at length, in the text. These include handouts on ethics, mixed-methods designs, writing integrated literature reviews, and an example research proposal format.

We hope you find these extra features useful. Good luck!

• Anatomy of a Research Article and Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Research (PDF: 35KB)
• Research Design and Ethics (PDF: 18KB)
• Integrated Literature Review, Research Question-Hypothesis (PDF: 9KB)
• Mixed Methods Approaches (PDF: 32KB)
• Research Proposal Format Example (PDF: 9KB)
• Worksheet: Planning for Trustworthiness in My Study (PDF: 7KB)
• Worksheet: Planning and Tracking Validity in My Study (PDF: 28KB)

You may also like

Research Methodology Example

Detailed Walkthrough + Free Methodology Chapter Template

If you’re working on a dissertation or thesis and are looking for an example of a research methodology chapter , you’ve come to the right place.

In this video, we walk you through a research methodology from a dissertation that earned full distinction , step by step. We start off by discussing the core components of a research methodology by unpacking our free methodology chapter template . We then progress to the sample research methodology to show how these concepts are applied in an actual dissertation, thesis or research project.

If you’re currently working on your research methodology chapter, you may also find the following resources useful:

• Research methodology 101 : an introductory video discussing what a methodology is and the role it plays within a dissertation
• Research design 101 : an overview of the most common research designs for both qualitative and quantitative studies
• Variables 101 : an introductory video covering the different types of variables that exist within research.
• Sampling 101 : an overview of the main sampling methods
• Methodology tips : a video discussion covering various tips to help you write a high-quality methodology chapter
• Private coaching : Get hands-on help with your research methodology

PS – If you’re working on a dissertation, be sure to also check out our collection of dissertation and thesis examples here .

FAQ: Research Methodology Example

Research methodology example: frequently asked questions, is the sample research methodology real.

Yes. The chapter example is an extract from a Master’s-level dissertation for an MBA program. A few minor edits have been made to protect the privacy of the sponsoring organisation, but these have no material impact on the research methodology.

Can I replicate this methodology for my dissertation?

As we discuss in the video, every research methodology will be different, depending on the research aims, objectives and research questions. Therefore, you’ll need to tailor your literature review to suit your specific context.

You can learn more about the basics of writing a research methodology chapter here .

Where can I find more examples of research methodologies?

The best place to find more examples of methodology chapters would be within dissertation/thesis databases. These databases include dissertations, theses and research projects that have successfully passed the assessment criteria for the respective university, meaning that you have at least some sort of quality assurance.

The Open Access Thesis Database (OATD) is a good starting point.

How do I get the research methodology chapter template?

You can access our free methodology chapter template here .

Is the methodology template really free?

Yes. There is no cost for the template and you are free to use it as you wish.

Great insights you are sharing here…

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

• Methodology
• Research Methodology

HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

• August 2017
• Publisher: Educreation
• ISBN: 978-1-5457-0340-3

• United Institute of Pharmacy, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow, India

• Institute of Pharmacy

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations

• Ms. Rimma Quadros
• Int J Sustain Dev Plann
• Purnawan Adi Wicaksono
• Diana Puspita Sari
• Faradhina Azzahra
• Nur Aini Sa'adati

• Gargi Yadav
• Nitya Awasthi
• Geetanjali Negi
• Alemayehu Abera Lema
• Getachew Gobena

• Yohan Wazirchand

• Sidra Akhtar
• Fahad Ali Malik
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin

Trinity Search

Trinity menu.

• Faculties and Schools
• Trinity Courses
• Trinity Research

Graduate Studies

You are here Prospective Students > Research Proposal Template

page under construction

Exploratory Research

Ai generator.

Obscurity can eat up a person’s mind; the lack of clarity can be maddening to those who have a working brain. When one can’t think straight or form a coherent thought, they start to feel as though they’ve lost touch with reality. To battle this phenomenon, people find a focus so that they can build something out of a little fact. When things become too vague, the best thing would be to conduct some sort of case analysis . It would help if you searched for something that can give you a clue to where the problem leads, how the complication unfolds, and what other factors can lead to the issue. To fix things, like this, you might need to conduct exploratory research.

Before you can conduct exploratory research, you first need to understand what it is. Exploratory research defines itself as the process of investigating an unclear and improperly set problem. This research methodology is a way to recognize an existing problem. This study is useful when the problem is at its early phase. It can give slight clarifications but will not provide conclusive results. Researchers use this study to lock on specific issues. Since this is exploratory, researchers are required to be flexible and able to divert the path of the research based on the new data gathered from this research.

Help and Handicap

Exploratory research is a critical research framework applicable to any research project . This is because it lets the researcher find a clear path to solve a given problem. It enables the researcher to explore his ideas to help him find suitable ways to formulate and answer research questions. This builds a firm understanding of the subject without impulsively making conclusions. This type of research still does come with its own set of advantages and disadvantages, though.

One thing that makes this research favorable is that it lets the researcher adapt to any changes in the data gathered. It’s easy for researchers to be flexible with this study. It also provides a reliable insight into a phenomenon that is worth all the time, effort, or cost spent. The most significant advantage is that it can lead to other possibilities. Whether that is finding new details to solve the problem or further exploratory data analysis.

Disadvantage

The biggest downside to exploratory research is that it can turn into qualitative research . The data of which can be interpreted with bias. This research also provides inconclusive data, which can still lead to an unclear study. This research design usually makes use of a small sample that cannot accurately describe the whole demographic. Also, when using secondary research to collect data for this study, the information might not be up to date and can render itself useless.

10+ Exploratory Research Examples

If you are looking for answers to what, why, and how questions regarding a particular issue, you might need to conduct exploratory research. This research stirs the curiosity of the researcher and dives him to look for ways to solve a problem. If you need more information about this research action plan , here are 10+ exploratory research examples you can look into.

1. Exploratory Research Workshops Example

Size: 84 KB

2. Exploratory Research Design Example

Size: 30 KB

 3. Exploratory Studies Social Science Research Example

4. Exploratory Research Project Example

Size: 39 KB

5. Fundamental and Exploratory Research Example

Size: 337 KB

6. Multiple Testing for Exploratory Researh Example

Size: 226 KB

7. Exploratory Social Science Research Example

Size: 494 KB

8. Exploratory Museum Studies Research Example

9. Exploratory Small Enterprises Research Example

Size: 309 KB

10. Exploratory Research Application Form Example

Size: 35 KB

11. Exploratory Research Essay Template

Wonderful Ways

Exploratory research is a very versatile research design. It can help you find faults in your case study or even your marketing strategies . This research can lead to further investigations like qualitative and descriptive research. But researching something would be really difficult if you have nowhere to start. There are many methods to accomplish this type of research; here are some of them.

1. Focus Group

A standard method in exploratory research is the use of focus groups. Having this in your research plan is strongly advised. This method selects 8-12 participants to answer questions and give insight into the topic studied. This strategy requires the participants to have similar backgrounds and experiences for the research results to be valid. This method provides useful information about the problem.

2. Polls / Survey

When collecting data regarding trends and opinions, the best methods for that are polls, survey questions, and questionnaires. The digital age has even helped in the advancement of this method through online surveys. That said, this method is considerably low cost. Researchers can also use this method to collect data from experts and specialists that know their way around the field and topic.

3. Interview

When gathering information, nothing beats in-person interviews. This way, you get to interact with your target market and research participants on a personal level. You get to gather information straight from the source. You can be sure that the facts you use for data analysis are reliable and valid. Interviewing experts can also provide you something not everyone can come across.

4. Secondary research

Exploratory research can also make use of secondary research. Documentary research can be a form of this method. By checking out previously conducted research, journals, and news articles, you can be sure that the data has been proven correct.

There is a quote that goes, “curiosity killed the cat.” What most people don’t know is that it is followed by, “but satisfaction brought it back.” This means that new things may be risky and dangerous, but when you get to prove something, you can get the satisfaction you deserve

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

10 Examples of Public speaking

20 Examples of Gas lighting

• Open access
• Published: 02 September 2024

Empathy ability and influencing factors among pediatric residents in China: a mixed-methods study

• Pingping Li 1   na1 ,
• Ling Weng 2   na1 &
• Lu Dong 1  

BMC Medical Education volume  24 , Article number:  955 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

Empathy is one of the fundamental factors enhancing the therapeutic effects of physician–patient relationships, but there has been no relevant research in China on the pediatric resident physicians’ capacity for empathy or the influencing factors.

A mixed-methods study was undertaken. The student version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy was used to assess 181 postgraduate residents at Shanghai Children’s Medical Center and Shanghai Children’s Hospital. Differences in empathy ability among pediatric resident physicians of different genders and specialties were analyzed using independent sample t-tests and Mann–Whitney U tests. A one-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences in empathy ability at different educational levels and years of medical residency training. Seven third-year postgraduate pediatric residents from Shanghai Children’s Medical Center participated in semi-structured interviews exploring the influencing factors. We analyzed the interview transcripts using thematic analysis.

The scale was completed by 154 pediatric residents. No statistically significant differences in empathy were found between educational level, postgraduate year, gender, or specialty. The factors influencing empathy in doctor–patient communication included the person who accompanied the child to see the doctor, how the children cooperated with doctors for medical treatment, the volume of pediatric outpatient and emergency visits, and the physician’s ability to withstand pressure. All interviewed resident physicians regarded learning empathy as important but rarely spent extra time learning it.

Conclusions

The evaluation results of resident physicians on changes in empathy after improving clinical abilities vary according to their understanding of empathy, and the work environment has an important impact on pediatricians’ empathy ability. Their empathy score is relatively low, and this requires exploration and intervention.

Peer Review reports

There has been a long-standing tension in the physician–patient relationship in pediatric clinics in China [ 1 ]. There are complex reasons for this, but research has found that 80% of doctor–patient disputes result from poor communication, often due to a lack of empathy during interactions [ 2 , 3 ]. The current medical literature defines empathy as the ability to understand the patient’s perspective and feelings, as well as sharing and acting on this understanding during interpersonal interactions [ 4 ]. Studies show that empathy is linked with enhanced patient satisfaction and treatment compliance [ 5 ]. High levels of empathy in healthcare professionals are connected to positive clinical prognoses for patients by reducing mental stress, improving self-awareness, and reducing anxiety and depression [ 6 , 7 ].

Residency training is mandatory for doctors to qualify to practice independently [ 8 ]. In China, standardized residency training began nationwide in 2013; seven government ministries jointly issued the policy document, “Guidance on the Establishment of a Standardized Residency Training System” [ 9 ]. All clinicians, including pediatricians, are required to undergo three-year residency training after graduating from medical school. During these three years, residents study in different departments.

The Chinese Medical Doctor Association recommends six core competencies for medical residents based on the content and standards for standardized residency training (2022 version): professionalism, clinical professionalism, managing patients, communication, teaching, and learning. While professionalism necessarily involves knowledge and skill, the unique characteristic of medical professionalism is empathy [ 10 ], a capacity that is also strongly related to communication. Thus, cultivating empathy is important for medical residents.

The student version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE-S) was specifically developed as a self-report scale for the assessment of empathy in medical students [ 11 , 12 ]. Some studies have reported a decline in empathy among medical students [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], while some have noted that students in their final year scored higher for empathy than did first-year medical students [ 16 , 17 ] and others have reported little change in empathy scores across the years [ 18 ]. However, there is little comparable research for China.

Some studies have shown that the work environment can affect the development of empathy [ 19 ], and pediatric departments recorded a high incidence of doctor–patient disputes [ 20 ]. According to the 2019 National Medical Injury Liability Dispute Case Big Data Report, pediatrics is a high-risk area for doctor–patient disputes.

Therefore, this study aimed to analyze whether there are differences in the ability to empathize among pediatric resident physicians of different grades and whether the pediatric medical environment affects that ability. A mixed-methods approach was used: We assessed empathy scores using the JSE-S and then conducted a semi-structured survey to discuss the influencing factors.

Study design

Quantitative and qualitative methodologies were used to analyze empathy and influencing factors among pediatric residents, incorporating a survey for the quantitative analysis and interviews for the qualitative assessment.

Quantitative methodology

Data collection: survey.

In July 2023, all residents of the Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, and the Children’s Hospital affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, were surveyed using an anonymous online questionnaire. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The survey was available online for one week, and after three days, the residents were sent reminders via WeChat by staff members from the two hospitals.

The JSE-S was used in this study [ 21 ] The scale consists of 20 items, measured using a seven-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = completely disagree to 7 = completely agree but with items 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14, 18, and 19 reverse scored. The total score of the scale comprises the total score for all items, with higher scores indicating higher levels of empathy. The scale is subdivided into three dimensions: perspective-taking, compassionate care, and standing in the patient’s shoes [ 12 , 21 ]. The maximum score on the JSE is 140, and the minimum score is 20. Other data collected as part of the JSE survey included sex and years of medical resident training, specialty, and education.

Data analysis

Independent samples t-tests were performed to assess differences in mean JSE scores between sexes. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the differences in mean JSE scores between specialties. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the differences between the different years of medical residency training and different levels of education. All analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics Version 25.0. The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise stated.

Qualitative methods

Data collection: interviews.

As the third-year postgraduate (PGY3) pediatric residents who entered standardized training for pediatric resident physicians in 2020 had completed their training, in August 2023, PGY3 pediatric residents at the Shanghai Children’s Medical Center were asked to participate in the interviews. Seven consented to participate (Table  1 ).

Two researchers (LPP and WL) conducted individual face-to-face semi-structured interviews. The interviews lasted 50–70 min (60-minute average) and were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim by a professional service. The interview guide (Table  2 ) included three aspects: work environment, residents’ standardized training, and open questions. The open-ended questions explored the most memorable cases of smooth and unsmooth communication with patients.

During the interviews, the research followed the guidelines of the interview outline and interviewees’ actual situations. The order and method of questioning were adjusted according to the context and the value of the questions. The language used by the interviewees was accepted without judgment, and no inducements or interventions were made. To protect the privacy of the respondents, their names have been replaced by numbers.

In accordance with a constructivist approach, the analyses tapped into the sense that the participants made of their experiences of communicating with patients. Inductive thematic analysis [ 22 ] was used to identify themes. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim by a professional service (iFLYTEK). WL and LPP read and reread transcripts for immersion and familiarization. Two authors (WL and LPP) iteratively coded the data deemed relevant to the current study using Nvivo14 [ 23 ]. Disagreements were discussed with another author (DL). The next step was to group related codes into potential themes. Subsequently, three authors (LPP, WL, and DL) jointly reviewed the themes to ensure that the codes in each theme were coherent and that the codes in different themes could be clearly distinguished.

Quantitative research results

Study population characteristics.

In total, 154 residents responded to the survey, a response rate of 85.1% (154/181). The participating pediatric residents included 60 (39.0%) residents from postgraduate year 1 (PGY1), 48 (31.1%) from postgraduate year 2 (PGY2), and 46 (29.9%) from PGY3. A total of 111 participants (72.1%) were women, and 43 (27.9%) were men. A total of 112 (72.7%) participants were pediatric residents, and 42 (27.3%) were pediatric surgery residents. There were 63 (40.9%) undergraduate residents, 69 (44.8%) master’s residents, and 22 (14.3%) doctoral degree residents in this study. The mean JSE-S score for the overall study population was 81.41 ± 5.43.

Based on the independent samples t-test and Mann–Whitney test, we found no differences in pediatrics’ sex (t = 0.878, p  = 0.381) or specialty (z=-0.981, p  = 0.327).

The education levels of different residents were not significantly different (f = 1.455, p  = 0.237) (Table  3 ).

Empathy competencies of pediatric residents with different pediatric standardized training years

The empathetic recognition mean JSE-S score was 81.41 ± 5.43. Compared to PGY1 (81.33 ± 4.45) and PGY2 (80.75 ± 4.08), PGY3 had a high JSE-S score (82.2 ± 7.48), but there were no significant differences between different years of medical residency training (f = 0.839, p  = 0.434) (Table  4 ).

In the perspective-taking scale, the mean JSE-S score was 54.66 ± 6.70, and the one-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between PGYs (f = 3.51, p  = 0.032). There were significant differences between PGYs for three items: “Physicians’ understanding of the emotional status of their patients, and that of their families is an important component of the physician–patient relationship” (f = 4.391, p  = 0.014); “Physicians should try to stand in their patients’ shoes when providing care to them” (f = 4.697, p  = 0.010); and “I believe that empathy is an important therapeutic factor in medical treatment” (f = 250.996, p  = 0.000).

The mean JSE-S score on the compassionate care scale was 20.76 ± 5.97. PYG1, PYG2, and PYG3 scored 22.42 ± 4.48, 19.42 ± 6.17, and 20.00 ± 7.00, respectively, indicating significant differences between them (f = 4.053, p  = 0.019). Significant differences were found for years of pediatric residency training for “Physicians should not allow themselves to be influenced by strong personal bonds between their patients (f = 40.158, p = 0.000) and their family members” and “I do not enjoy reading non-medical literature or the arts.” (f = 37.236, p  = 0.000).

The standing in the patient’s shoes dimension of the JSE-S showed no significant differences between the PGYs.

Qualitative research results

The influence of pediatric visiting environment on physicians’ empathy ability.

Because children are unable to express their discomfort or illness well, they should be accompanied by parents or grandparents when attending hospital. Doctors, therefore, have to communicate with the parents or grandparents, and their circumstances, including their education level, familiarity with the child, physical health status, communication and understanding skills, and attitude toward doctors, can affect empathy between doctors and patients.

Compared to adult hospitals , the empathy ability of doctors in children’s hospitals may be slightly reduced because we are dealing with parents , not patients themselves , and many of them are brought for treatment by elderly people. Elderly people do not understand the child’s disease or may have difficulty hearing clearly , which can greatly affect communication , let alone empathy. (P1, M) Some elderly people may regard their children’s condition unnecessarily seriously , resulting in us not being able to understand the symptoms of the child properly. (P2, F) Parents tend to have a good understanding of the child’s condition. If grandparents with a low education or if other relatives bring them over , the process of consultation may not be very smooth. (P3, F) The child might be brought over on the first day of treatment by their parents but subsequently by older relatives. Because the child is still running a fever for two or three days , they will be very anxious. When they communicate this to us , their attitude is often poor. (P4, M) If an elderly person brings a child to see a doctor , I often ask the elderly person to call the parents on the spot so I can listen to them. It is better this way. (P7, M)

Some resident physicians said that the language of the patients’ parents significantly impacted their ability to empathize:

Because I am not from Shanghai and grandparents who accompany their children may speak the local dialect , we are unable to communicate. This is challenging for me and many colleagues because most of us cannot understand the Shanghai dialect. (P2, F)

The child’s upbringing and willingness to cooperate with treatment were also identified as important:

Some parents may spoil their children , some children start acting spoiled as soon as they arrive at the clinic , and some even make a scene , which can interfere with the medical treatment. (P2, F)

The volume of pediatric outpatient and emergency visits and the self-regulation ability of physicians facing strong workloads can also affect communication and empathy between doctors and patients:

Outpatient hours may limit our communication with patients. Generally , you need to finish one within 5–10 min. Otherwise , the patient’s visit may be too long , and you may not be able to see all registered patients before leaving work. For example , last summer , our two doctors saw an average of around 130–150 patients a day , while I saw an average of 80–90 patients per day. That was during the pandemic last year , and there will definitely be more this year. (P7, M) The doctor is very tired and has a large number of patients. If the patients are in a hurry , you need to see them within a short period. If our resident physician’s self-regulation ability is not good , it will affect communication. (P5, M)

Standardized training for resident physicians to cultivate empathy skills

The three resident physicians interviewed believed that in their first year of participating in standardized resident training, they felt more empathy for patients due to their lack of clinical knowledge. By contrast, after three years of clinical practice and improvements in their clinical knowledge, they viewed the patient’s condition more rationally and from a medical perspective.

Because you have learned systematic knowledge about diseases , you know what the likely outcome will be objectively. Consequently , your empathy regarding the intermediate treatment process and patients may decrease , and you have to think about the treatment from a doctor’s professional perspective. (P2, F) When I first entered standardized training for resident physicians , I lacked clinical experience and was not familiar with the treatment process for many diseases. When I encountered critically ill patients , I felt that they were so pitiful. After three years of training , however , these diseases have become more familiar. I know the treatment processes for each disease and feel that empathy has decreased. (P3, F)

The two residents felt that empathy followed a curved path. Residents who have just entered clinical practice have relatively high empathy. However, as their clinical abilities and understanding of diseases increase, coupled with the busy workload of clinical work, their empathy decreases. However, empathy may improve after becoming a physician.

When I went to the outpatient clinic with my supervisor , I felt that my supervisor , who was already a chief physician , had reached a very high level of empathy. I think his empathy ability was much stronger than mine; that is , regardless of the patient’s attitude , he could think from the patient’s perspective. As a resident physician , I still cannot reach the level of empathy that my supervisor possesses. Perhaps I need to acquire some experience in my career to reach the level of empathy that my supervisor possesses , but the process may be a bit complex. (P2, F) As a physician , I think that empathy is a curved process , initially high , but as your clinical abilities improve and work experience increases , empathy may decrease. The attending physician is very busy , and at some point , the value of empathy may be underestimated , but it increases again with age. Perhaps at a certain point or stage , you suddenly feel it is important , and you become very focused on the ability to empathize. (P3, F)

Two interviewees believed that after three years of standardized training for resident physicians, their empathy skills had improved. Three years ago, they only thought about the disease. Today, they are able to think from the perspective of the patient and stand in their shoes.

For example , parents who come to the surgical emergency department are very anxious. As a physician , I can understand their feelings. Some common diseases that you have seen before have a likely trajectory. Although you are also anxious about their diseases , you know how to treat different disease symptoms and have the ability to handle them. I know why parents are anxious , and I can think from their perspective. (P4, F) As you gain an understanding of diseases and as your own abilities and clinical experience improve , your feelings toward the patient change. Because I know how a disease like Mycoplasma pneumonia , for example , develops , when I was in PGY1 , I felt that the child’s cough was very severe , which made the parents very anxious. At the time , I was also quite anxious. Now , however , I know that the course of this disease is long. If parents are very anxious , I will explain this disease to them and comfort them. I have had more contact with patients , and I will consider the problem more from their perspective. (P6, F)

Cultivating residents’ empathy ability during standardized resident training

Self-study: The residents believed it important to learn theories relevant to doctor–patient communication and empathy. The interviews revealed that most of them improved their communication skills in clinical practice, and a few residents spent time studying how to communicate with patients. Only one student bought a book about communication, and one student paid attention to the ability to communicate with patients because they had to take an exam on doctor–patient communication.

When I was admitted for training , there was a medical teacher talking about doctor–patient disputes , which was quite scary at the time. I bought relevant books but did not read them. (P1, M) I have not bought any books related to doctor–patient communication , but I think in clinical practice , it is necessary to participate more in the conversation process with superiors , listen more to their conversations , listen more to how they communicate with patients , and then try to learn how to better communicate with patients on my own. (P2, F) This year’s standardized training and graduation assessment for resident physicians added an assessment of doctor–patient communication. I have paid attention to this knowledge , but I have not delved into it. (P3, F)

Training course: It is necessary to set courses to cultivate residents’ empathy ability, such as theoretical training courses, case-sharing groups, and scenario simulations.

I think it’s necessary to set courses for residents to teach us how to communicate , how to express the appropriate level of empathy to patients , etc. (P1, M) I think theoretical teaching in this area is possible , but it cannot be a single output of this teaching mode. Instead , we could hold some doctor–patient communication and sharing meetings , where residents or specialists could share their cases in clinical work and learn from each other . (P3, F) Maybe establish some scenario simulation courses for training. (P5, M)

Sharing the most memorable cases during resident training

Due to the fact that resident physicians undergo rotational training in different clinical departments over 3 years, clinical departments, patient situations, work environments, and severity of diseases may vary. By conducting interviews with resident physicians during the training period, the factors that affect the empathy ability of resident physicians can be further explored by allowing them to profoundly impact the departments where communication with patients is not smooth or smooth. The results are shown in Table  5 .

Clinical empathy and number of years of standardized training

Some studies have shown that empathy scores are associated with ratings of clinical competence [ 24 ]. From the results of the questionnaire survey, the JSE-S scores of PGY1, PGY2, and PGY3 showed no significant differences. From the interview results, seven respondents compared the changes in their empathy skills between the beginning and completion of the standardized resident physician training. Five pediatric resident physicians believed that their empathy skills had decreased with the improvement in their medical skills, while two resident physicians believed that their empathy skills improved after receiving standardized resident physician training. The results of the interviews seem to confirm the results of the questionnaire survey that different physicians have different understandings of the relationship between the improvement of clinical abilities and empathy. These two perspectives may be due to different perspectives on empathy. A resident physician who believes that empathy decreases may believe that the physician’s empathy toward patients is more about the patient’s illness. As their medical abilities improve, they can treat the patient’s illness and believe that it will eventually be cured, so the need for empathy decreases. Some studies have reported that doctors who sympathize with their patients share their suffering, which could lead to emotional fatigue and a lack of objectivity [ 25 ]. However, one resident physician believed empathy had improved by progressing from learning about diseases from books during their medical student stage to the realities of clinical practice, seeing the impact of diseases on patients, families, and even society.

Clinical empathy and the pediatric work environment

Doctor–patient communication in pediatrics is more complex and difficult than when treating adults, meaning that pediatricians bear higher risks. The probability of medical disputes in pediatrics is much higher than in other departments; pediatricians are often insulted and even physically threatened [ 26 ]. Physician empathy is at the heart of doctor–patient communication and significantly influences patient outcomes [ 27 ]. This study explored the factors that influence empathy between pediatricians and patients. In patient terms, the level of cooperation from the child and the characteristics of the person accompanying the child are factors. As for the doctors, they can be confronted with pressure and the need to communicate effectively in the face of high outpatient volumes, which can affect their expressions of empathy, a finding similar to that of previous studies [ 28 , 29 ].

Further analysis of direct doctor–patient communication and empathy among pediatric resident physicians in different rotating departments showed that communication between doctors and patients was seen to be smoother in the Rheumatology and Immunology, General Surgery, and Special Diagnosis Departments, while difficulties were encountered in Outpatients and Emergency, Hematology and Oncology, Surgical Oncology, and Cardiology. The reasons may be complex, but four principal issues can be identified. First, the duration of communication between doctors and patients and the environment of medical treatment; in the Special Diagnosis Department, for example, patients are able to communicate and interact with doctors for a long time, and the medical environment is very good, whereas Outpatients and Emergency see a rapid turnover and high workload. Second, the level of familiarity between patients and physicians can play a role. In Rheumatology and Immunology Departments, for example, there are often patients with chronic diseases who have been hospitalized for a long time; doctors and patients are very familiar with each other, and some studies have shown empathy is easier to generate when closer interpersonal relationships develop [ 30 ]. Third, different teaching methods may have an impact. Better training on the wards can make residents feel more confident in communicating with patients, whereas Outpatients and Emergency can require residents to face patients alone, generating anxiety or even burnout [ 31 ]. Fourth, disease severity can play a role. In some departments, such as Hematology and Oncology, patients may not have a high hope of recovery but may have high expectations of the treatment. This may not only put a lot of pressure on doctors but also make it difficult to communicate effectively with patients; research has indicated that there is still a gap between the actual and expected disclosure of “bad news” about cancer among healthcare workers, patients, and family members, leading to various disclosure dilemmas [ 32 ].

Clinical empathy across different settings

The mean empathy levels found in this study (81.41 ± 5.43) are lower than those reported [ 33 ] in most similar studies around the world. Similar lower JSE scores have been seen in undergraduate medical students in China; the average JSE score among medical students from Sun Yat-sen University was 84 [ 34 ]. This finding is concerning. The shortage of pediatricians, [ 35 ] low wages, [ 36 ] severe occupational burnout, [ 37 ] and the influence of Asian parental culture [ 38 ] may partly explain our findings. Further investigations are required to determine the factors associated with such low scores so that steps can be taken to address the situation.

Cultivating empathy among pediatric residents

Our research shows that resident physicians believe that empathy is important, even though their self-rated empathy scores are less than ideal. Interventions to further investigate the teaching and learning of empathy were discussed [ 39 ]. Many training courses have proven to be beneficial in enhancing the empathy skills of resident physicians. The teaching innovation “How to act-in-role” has been shown to be effective not only in increasing medical students’ self-reported empathy but also in their competence in consultation skills [ 40 ]. The addition of narrative medicine-based education in standardized training improved empathy and may have improved the professional knowledge of residents [ 41 , 42 ] The use of Balint group activities [ 43 ] with residents has shown significant improvements in empathy across all dimensions. Medical schools should design appropriate training courses and implement interventions at all stages (from the admission process to curricula to residency) and levels (explicit and implicit curricula) depending on the empathy levels of their resident physicians.

Our findings suggest that, based on the different understandings of empathy among resident physicians, the clinical empathy level of pediatric resident physicians is not closely related to an improvement in clinical abilities. Rather, the working environment of pediatricians significantly impacts their empathy ability. Empathy is lower among pediatric residents in China when compared to their European counterparts, and further research into the underlying factors associated with such low scores is necessary to plan interventions to cultivate empathy among pediatric residents.

Limitations

One important weakness of this study is that it was based in one medical school with two specialized children’s hospitals; the limited sample size of the investigation and interviews may mean that the study is not representative of pediatric residents in China. Moreover, the cross-sectional survey precluded us from identifying a causal relationship; thus, a prospective longitudinal study with a larger sample size of pediatric residents is warranted.

Data availability

The questionnaire data that support the findings of this study are available in the Baidu Netdisk repository, https://pan.baidu.com/s/1hRjCKuIVVry79HwTzxB_bA with the primary accession code e9hp.The interview datasets analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy concerns but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Wenhui G, Xinqing Z, Shanshan L, et al. Cognitive analysis of medical staff in clinical departments of 45 hospitals in nine provinces on the tense doctor-patient relationship. J Southeast Univ. 2018;20(4):124–129145. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-511X.2018.04.014 . Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition.

Article   Google Scholar  

Zhang X, Sleeboom-Faulkner M. Tensions between medical professionals and patients in mainland China. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011;20(3):458–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180111000144 .

Jiang S. Pathways linking patient-centered communication to health improvement: a longitudinal study in China. J Health Commun. 2019;24(2):156–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1587110 .

Mercer SW, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GC. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. 2004;21(6):699–705. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmh621 .

Kane GC, Gotto JL, Mangione S, West S, Hojat M. Jefferson scale of patient’s perceptions of physician empathy: preliminary psychometric data. Croat Med J. 2007;48(1):81–6.

Google Scholar  

Lorié áine, Reinero DA, Phillips M, et al. Culture and nonverbal expressions of empathy in clinical settings: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:411–24.

Hemmerdinger JM, Stoddart SDR, Lilford RJ. A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7:24.

Joyce BL, Scher E, Steenbergh T, Voutt-Goos MJ. Development of an institutional resident curriculum in communication skills. J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3(4):524–8.

Li FY, Wen Y, Lei PG, et al. The present situation and consideration of Residency standardized training in China. China Contin Med Educ. 2019;11:92–4.

Montgomery L, Loue S, Stange KC. Linking the heart and the head: humanism and professionalism in medical education and practice. Fam Med. 2017;49(5):378–83.

Alcorta-Garza AJ, Gonzalez-Guerrero JF, Tavitas-Herrera SE, Rodrigues-Lara FJ, Hojat M. Validity of the Jefferson scale of physician empathy among Mexican medical students. Salud Ment (Mex). 2005;28:57–63.

Hojat M. Empathy in Patient Care: antecedents, Development, Measurement, and outcomes. New York: Springer; 2007.

Hojat M, Shannon SC, DeSantis J, Speicher MR, Bragan L, Calabrese LH. Does empathy decline in the clinical phase of medical education? A nationwide, multi-institutional, cross-sectional study of students at DO-granting medical schools. Acad Med 2020;95(6):911–918. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003175 , PMID: 31977341.

Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K et al. The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med 2009;84(9):1182–1191. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17e55 . Erratum in: Acad Med 2009;84(9):1182–1191. PMID: 19707055.

Hojat M. Change in empathy in medical school. Med Educ 2018;52(4):456–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13497 , PMID: 29574956.

Magalhães E, Salgueira AP, Costa P, Costa MJ. Empathy in senior year and first year medical students: a cross-sectional study. B MC Med Educ 2011;11:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-52 , PMID: 21801365.

Ye X, Guo H, Xu Z, et al. Empathy variation of undergraduate medical students after early clinical contact: a cross-sectional study in China. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e035690. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035690 .

Assing Hvidt E, Søndergaard J, Wehberg S, Hvidt NC, Andersen CM. A cross-sectional study of student empathy across four medical schools in Denmark-associations between empathy level and age, sex, specialty preferences and motivation. BMC Med Educ 2022;22(1):489. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03532-2 , PMID: 35739548.

Yu CC, Tan L, Le MK, et al. The development of empathy in the healthcare setting: a qualitative approach. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03312-y . PMID: 35379249, PMCID: PMC8981670.

Wanqi F. Chen panorama analysis and countermeasures of common nurse patient disputes in pediatrics. Qilu J Nurs. 2011;17(21):117–8. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2011.21.087 .

Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Vergare M, Magee M. Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(9):1563–9.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

Houghton C, Murphy K, Meehan B, Thomas J, Brooker D, Casey D. From screening to synthesis: using NVivo to enhance transparency in qualitative evidence synthesis. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(5–6):873–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13443 .

Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Mangione S et al. Empathy in medical students as related to academic performance, clinical competence and gender. Med Educ 2002;36(6):522–527. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01234.x , PMID: 12047665.

Zhao JB, Liang SW, Hou YF. Etc the relationship between empathy fatigue and post-traumatic stress disorder among clinical doctors. Guangdong Med. 2017;38(24):3841–4. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2017.24.036 .

Xu W, Zhang SC. Chinese pediatricians face a crisis: should they stay or leave? Pediatrics. 2014;134(6):1045–7. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1377 . Epub 2014 Nov 10. PMID: 25384495.

Zhang X, Li L, Zhang Q, Le LH, Wu Y. Physician empathy in doctor-patient communication: A systematic review. Health Commun . 2023:1–11. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2201735. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37062918.

Libo J. Analysis and resolution of doctor-patient disputes in grassroots pediatric outpatient clinics. Chin Community Phys. 2020;36(10):184–.

Lingyan G. Research on Building a Good Pediatric Doctor-Patient Relationship from the perspective of Public Management [D]. Suzhou University; 2022. https://doi.org/10.27351/dcnki.gszhu.2022.000265 .

Wuying C, Lianqi L. The influence of context on empathy. Prog Psychol Sci. 2016;24(1):91–100. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00091 .

Song C, Du XT, Hong YX, Mao JH, Zhang W. Association between social supports and negative emotions among pediatric residents in China: the chain-mediating role of psychological resilience and burnout. Front Public Health 2022;10:962259. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.962259 , PMID: 36755738.

Jiaman S, Lihua L, Linling Y, et al. An analysis of the current situation and difficulties in informing cancer bad news. Chin Med Ethics. 2023;36(05):540–7.

Lases LSS, Arah OA, Busch ORC, Heineman MJ, Lombarts KMJMH. Learning climate positively influences residents’ work-related well-being. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2019;24(2):317–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9868-4 . Epub 2018 Dec 5. PMID: 30519786.

Min C, Zhen H, Mengxian L. Etc a survey and analysis of the effectiveness of cultivating empathy skills among medical students. Med Educ Res Pract. 2023;31(5):583–6. https://doi.org/10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2023.05.014 .

Wei W, Ruiling Z, Jiongfeng Z. etc A literature review on the reasons and countermeasures for the shortage of pediatricians in China. Chizi , 2019 (15): 273.

Xinxin Y. A study on the factors influencing the vocational inclination and turnover behavior of Pediatric doctors in Public Medical institutions [D]. Guangdong: Southern Medical University; 2020.

Lei F, Chao S, Yunxia H. Etc analysis of the current situation and countermeasures of occupational burnout among standardized training students for pediatric resident physicians. Chin J Med Educ Explor. 2023;22(5):796–800. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220518-01297 .

Claramita M, Dalen JV, Van Der Vleuten CP. Doctors in a southeast Asian country communicate sub-optimally regardless of patients’ educational background. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(3):e169–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.002 . Epub 2011 Mar 21. PMID: 21420821.

Lim BT, Moriarty H, Huthwaite M, Gray L, Pullon S, Gallagher P. How well do medical students rate and communicate clinical empathy? Med Teach 2013;35(2):e946-e951. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.715783 . Epub 2012 Sep 3. PMID: 22938688.

Lim BT, Moriarty H, Huthwaite M. Being-in-role: A teaching innovation to enhance empathic communication skills in medical students. Med Teach 2011;33(12):e663-e669. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.611193 , PMID: 22225448.

Zhao J, Xiantao O, Li Q et al. Role of narrative medicine-based education in cultivating empathy in residents. BMC Med Educ 2023;23(1):124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04096-5 , PMID: 36810009.

Ziółkowska-Rudowicz E, Kładna A. Empathy-building of physicians. Part IV–development of skills enhancing capacity for empathy. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2010;29(174):400–4. Polish. PMID: 21298994.

Haiyan G, Qinmei Z. Yongfei Z, etc the Impact of Bahrain Group activities on Empathy and Communication skills in standardized training of traditional Chinese medicine residents. J Traditional Chin Med Manage. 2019;27(12):103–5.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financed by Postgraduate Medical Education Project in 2022 (BYH20220412); The 2022 Science and Technology Innovation Project (Humanities and Social Sciences) Project of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (WK2217); Fujian Medical University Education Reform Project: Application Research on the Intelligent Teaching Platform for Clinical Teachers under the Background of “New Medical Science” (J22021).

Author information

Pingping Li and Ling Weng contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Pediatric Clinical Medicine School, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China

Pingping Li & Lu Dong

Department of Science and Education, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian, 350000, China

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

L.P.P. conceptualized the idea of this study. L.P.P. and W.L. contributed to design of the project and survey preparation and dissemination. L.P.P. contributed to investigate. D.L. contributed to writing-review and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu Dong .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the institutional research ethics committee of Shanghai Children’s Medical Center Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine(NO: SCMCTRB-K2023147-1). All participants received written explanations about the study in advance and signed a written consent form to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Li, P., Weng, L. & Dong, L. Empathy ability and influencing factors among pediatric residents in China: a mixed-methods study. BMC Med Educ 24 , 955 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05858-5

Download citation

Received : 29 April 2024

Accepted : 02 August 2024

Published : 02 September 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05858-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Empathy ability
• Pediatric residents

BMC Medical Education

ISSN: 1472-6920

• General enquiries: [email protected]