systems training for emotional predictability and problem solving

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• HHS Author Manuscripts

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) for Outpatients With Borderline Personality Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial and 1-Year Follow-Up

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) is a 20-week manual-based group treatment program for outpatients with borderline personality disorder that combines cognitive behavioral elements and skills training with a systems component. The authors compared STEPPS plus treatment as usual with treatment as usual alone in a randomized controlled trial.

Subjects with borderline personality disorder were randomly assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual or treatment as usual alone. Total score on the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included measures of global functioning, depression, impulsivity, and social functioning; suicide attempts and self-harm acts; and crisis utilization. Subjects were followed 1 year posttreatment. A linear mixed-effects model was used in the analysis.

Data pertaining to 124 subjects (STEPPS plus treatment as usual [N=65]; treatment as usual alone [N=59]) were analyzed. Subjects assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual experienced greater improvement in the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder total score and subscales assessing affective, cognitive, interpersonal, and impulsive domains. STEPPS plus treatment as usual also led to greater improvements in impulsivity, negative affectivity, mood, and global functioning. These differences yielded moderate to large effect sizes. There were no differences between groups for suicide attempts, self-harm acts, or hospitalizations. Most gains attributed to STEPPS were maintained during follow-up. Fewer STEPPS plus treatment as usual subjects had emergency department visits during treatment and follow-up. The discontinuation rate was high in both groups.

Conclusions

STEPPS, an adjunctive group treatment, can deliver clinically meaningful improvements in borderline personality disorder-related symptoms and behaviors, enhance global functioning, and relieve depression.

The treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder is challenging ( 1 , 2 ). The use of medication has increased, but while several drugs have proven useful, their benefit has been modest ( 3 – 4 ). A range of psychotherapies has been developed and several have garnered empirical support ( 5 – 12 ), including dialectical behavioral therapy ( 5 – 7 , 12 ), mentalization-based therapy ( 8 , 9 ), cognitive behavioral therapy ( 10 ), schema-focused therapy ( 11 ), and transference-focused therapy ( 12 ).

In 1995, Blum et al. developed Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) based on a program introduced by Bartels and Crotty ( 13 ). STEPPS is a group treatment that combines cognitive behavior elements and skills training with a systems component for individuals with whom a patient regularly interacts ( 14 , 15 ). STEPPS is easily learned and efficiently delivered by therapists of varying educational and professional backgrounds. The program supplements—but does not replace—a patient’s ongoing treatment (e.g., medication, individual therapy, case management). Data from two uncontrolled studies have supported its use ( 16 , 17 ). STEPPS is used in the United States ( 18 ) and was introduced in the Netherlands in 1998. By 2005, nearly 400 Dutch therapists were trained in its use ( 18 ).

In the present study, we report results of a 20-week randomized controlled trial and a 1-year follow-up. Outpatients with borderline personality disorder were randomly assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual or treatment as usual alone. We hypothesized the following: 1) STEPPS plus treatment as usual would result in greater improvement in borderline traits, social functioning, global functioning, and mood relative to treatment as usual alone; 2) STEPPS plus treatment as usual would result in fewer suicidal and self-harm acts and the use of fewer crisis resources relative to treatment as usual alone; and 3) gains resulting from STEPPS plus treatment as usual would be maintained during the follow-up.

Subjects with DSM-IV ( 19 ) borderline personality disorder were recruited from the University of Iowa inpatient and outpatient psychiatric services (N=92); clinicians and mental health centers in eastern Iowa (N=35); advertisements (N=29); word of mouth (N=8); and unspecified methods (N=8). We excluded subjects who 1) did not speak English; 2) had a psychotic or primary neurological disorder; 3) were cognitively impaired; 4) had current (past month) substance abuse or dependence; or 5) participated in STEPPS previously. Subjects were required to designate a mental health professional and a friend or relative to serve as system members. The purpose was to ensure that an independent mental health professional could be reached in a crisis and that a friend or relative could participate in the systems component of STEPPS. The designated individual was taught how to respond to the subject’s dysfunctional thoughts or behaviors. Subjects were not required to have recent suicidal or self-harm behavior. Subjects gave written informed consent according to procedures approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board.

Assessments

The diagnosis of borderline personality disorder was established using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality ( 20 ). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) ( 21 ) assessed current and lifetime DSM-IV axis I disorders. Efficacy assessments included the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder ( 22 ) to assess affective disturbance, cognitive disturbance, impulsivity, and disturbed relationships; the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time ( 18 ) to assess thoughts, feelings, and behaviors associated with borderline personality disorder; the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) ( 23 ) to assess positive and negative dispositions; the Beck Depression Inventory ( 24 ); the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised ( 25 ); the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (version 11a) ( 26 ); and the Social Adjustment Scale ( 27 ). Suicide and self-harm behaviors, medication usage, physician visits, other therapies, and crisis contacts were also assessed.

Primary outcome was the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder total score. Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder subscales were used as secondary efficacy measures. Other secondary measures included the rater-administered Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Improvement and Severity scales ( 28 ), patient CGI self-rating ( 28 ), Global Assessment Scale ( 29 ), Beck Depression Inventory ( 24 ), Symptom Checklist-90-Revised ( 25 ), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale ( 26 ), and Social Adjustment Scale ( 27 ). The CGI and Global Assessment Scales were used in part because of their demonstrated utility in medication studies of borderline personality disorder ( 30 , 31 ). Secondary outcome measures also included crisis variables (hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and crisis phone calls), suicide attempts, and self-harm acts.

To achieve reliability on interview measures, raters were trained by Nancee Blum, who also provided ongoing supervision. Excellent diagnostic agreement was achieved (kappa=1.0 for borderline personality disorder). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.96 for the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder total and 0.58 for the CGI severity ratings.

In addition to screening and baseline evaluations, subjects were assessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 ( 32 ) was administered at week 20.

Treatment Assignment

Subjects were assigned by coin toss to either the STEPPS plus treatment as usual group or treatment as usual alone group. Whenever eight to 12 subjects were assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual, they were notified that a group would begin. Groups began a mean of 6.5 (SD=6.6) weeks after random assignment. Eight treatment cohorts were recruited between 2002 and 2006.

STEPPS Program

STEPPS is a manual-based group treatment program for out-patients with borderline personality disorder that combines cognitive behavioral elements with skills training; it does not include individual therapy. The program involves 20 2-hour weekly sessions with two co-facilitators who follow a detailed lesson plan. Participants receive a packet of materials each week, including an agenda and homework assignments. STEPPS is systems-based in that family members, significant others, and health care professionals are educated about borderline personality disorder and instructed how best to interact with their relative or friend with the disorder. Participants are urged to share their notebooks and lesson materials with system members.

The STEPPS program has the following three main components: 1) psychoeducation about borderline personality disorder; 2) emotion management skills training; and 3) behavior management skills training. The first component teaches subjects to replace misconceptions about borderline personality disorder with an awareness of the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that define it and to identify their own schemas (i.e., cognitive filters) that drive their behaviors. The disorder is also reframed as an emotional intensity disorder, which patients find preferable to borderline personality disorder. The second component teaches the following skills to better manage the cognitive and emotional effects of borderline personality disorder: distancing, communicating, challenging, distracting, and problem management. The third component teaches the following behavioral skills, which subjects are encouraged to master: goal setting, healthy eating behaviors, sleep hygiene, regular exercise, leisure activities, health monitoring (e.g., medication adherence), avoiding self-harm, and interpersonal effectiveness. A session-by-session description is provided in Table 1 .

Session-by-Session Description of Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) for Outpatients With Borderline Personality Disorder

Sessions have the look and feel of a seminar. Participants sit at a conference table facing a board. There is a short break between the first and second hours. Each weekly session is organized around a particular skill. Some skills require more than one session to teach. In addition to the use of a board and printed materials, the program is facilitated by poetry, songs, art work, and relaxation exercises. Participants are encouraged to bring materials or artwork to reinforce the skills and themes of the meetings.

Participants are asked to monitor their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors over the course of the program; this enables them to become aware of and to monitor improvements in the intensity and frequency of their emotional episodes. They are introduced to the Emotional Intensity Continuum, a 1- to 5-point scale using the metaphor of pots on a burner. At level 1, there is no heat under the pot; at level 5 the pot is boiling over. This allows participants to recognize early warning signs of an impending outburst. New skills become the tools to prevent the heat from getting too hot, thereby reducing the chance that the pot will boil over. With this and other metaphors, abstract concepts are made more concrete and understandable. As participants progress, they are asked to monitor the new skills employed to manage their emotional intensity. Patients gradually become more aware of emotional triggers that may lead to outbursts.

Participants are encouraged to continue with ongoing concomitant treatment. Those participating in individual therapy are asked to familiarize their therapist with STEPPS, thereby enabling all members of the treatment team to employ a consistent approach and terminology. Participants are encouraged to show a copy of the handouts to their therapist and to review their homework assignments during their individual sessions.

A 2-hour evening session is held for family members or significant others as part of the program. These individuals are educated about borderline personality disorder and how best to respond to their relative or friend with the disorder. STEPPS attendees are encouraged to share their lessons with their individual therapist and significant others. This constitutes the systems component of the program.

STEPPS was administered by two of the authors of the present study (Ms. Blum and Mr. St. John). Adherence to the manual was rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of 5 denoting excellent adherence (unpublished data of Donald W. Black, 2002). A score of 4 (good) or higher was considered acceptable. Two Ph.D.-level psychologists who were not involved with the randomized controlled trial but familiar with STEPPS rated 43 randomly selected videotaped sessions. The mean adherence score was 4.4 (SD=0.8).

Additional information about the STEPPS program may be found at www.steppsforbpd.com . The website contains a summary of the program, literature references, author information, and contact instructions.

Treatment as Usual

Subjects assigned to either STEPPS plus treatment as usual or to treatment as usual alone were encouraged to continue their usual care, including individual psychotherapy, medication, and case management. Subjects received no instructions or advice about other pharmacologic or psychotherapeutic treatments. Subjects assigned to treatment as usual alone could not attend any STEPPS group until they completed the 20-week trial.

At the end of the 20-week treatment period, subjects entered a 1-year follow up. Assessments were made at months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. These included the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time, Beck Depression Inventory, PANAS, CGI severity and improvement ratings, Global Assessment Scale, and Social Adjustment Scale. Data on crisis variables, medication use, psychotherapy visits, suicide attempts, and self-harm acts were also collected.

Statistical Analysis

Subjects with at least one postbaseline assessment were included in the analyses. To test for treatment group imbalances, baseline demographic characteristics and clinical variables were compared using Pearson’s chi-square tests or Student’s t tests.

A linear mixed-effects model was used for primary and secondary outcomes. Each subject’s trajectory of scores from baseline to week 20 was summarized with a subject-specific intercept and slope, thus allowing STEPPS efficacy to be tested by examining the difference between the mean slopes of the two groups. To adjust for possible bias from informative right censoring (which occurs, for example, when subjects with more favorable response are more likely to be assessed), last assessment time was used as a covariate for intercepts and slopes. For the primary outcome variable (Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder total), last assessment time was not related to baseline score (intercept) or level of improvement (slope), and therefore this adjustment had little effect on the test of STEPPS efficacy. To ensure that a significant baseline difference with respect to avoidant personality disorder did not confound the test of STEPPS efficacy, the disorder was used as a covariate for intercepts and slopes. Avoidant personality disorder was associated with baseline severity (intercept) for the primary outcome but not level of improvement (slope), an adjustment that had little effect on the test of STEPPS efficacy.

Group differences were also tested across the 1-year follow-up. A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model was used to compare group changes from week 20 with week 72 (1-year follow-up). By utilizing the correlation of subjects’ responses over time, this model accommodates subjects with incomplete data. The correlation of subjects’ responses was assumed to have a first-order autoregressive structure, which assumes that the correlation of a subject’s responses decreases as the time between the assessments increases. For this analysis, week 20 was considered the baseline.

Groups were compared on the use of crisis services throughout the treatment and follow-up periods. For these variables, subjects were asked to report utilization during the last month. For each subject, we counted the number of follow-up months (n) and number of months for which each crisis service (hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and crisis calls) was utilized (y). Assuming a binomial model (y is a binomial random variable with parameters n and p) with logistic link function, we tested whether the probability of monthly utilization (p) differed for the groups. Using the Cox proportional hazards model, the study groups were compared on times to first suicide attempt and self-harm act.

Statistical analyses were carried out using SAS ( 33 ). The linear mixed-effects and repeated measure models were fit using the MIXED procedure; the binomial models were fit using the NL-MIXED procedure; and the Cox proportional hazards model was fit using the PHREG procedure. All tests were performed using a two-sided significance level of p=0.05.

One hundred seventy-two men and women 18 years and older were screened; 165 were enrolled and randomly assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual or treatment as usual alone. One hundred twenty-five subjects received the allocated interventions. Of these, data from 124 were analyzed ( Figure 1 ). (One subject was excluded because of a primary neurological disorder.) The groups were balanced on baseline demographic and clinical variables ( Table 2 ), except avoidant personality disorder was more frequent in the treatment as usual alone group (66% versus 45%; χ 2 =5.8, df=1, p=0.016).

Consort Diagram of Patient Flow in the Randomized Controlled Trial

Baseline Social, Demographic, and Clinical Characteristics of 124 Outpatients With Borderline Personality Disorder, by Treatment Assignment

Forty-five (69%) subjects assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual and 51 (86%) subjects assigned to treatment as usual alone completed the week 20 assessment (χ 2 =5.2, df=1, p=0.022). Baseline variables—age, gender, severity (Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time), and depression (Beck Depression Inventory)—were not predictive of having at least one postbaseline assessment or early discontinuation. Subjects completed a mean of 4.2 (SD=1.3) assessments, with no significant differences between treatment conditions (Mann-Whitney test: χ 2 =1.6, df=1, p=0.213). Overall, 82 (66%) subjects were assessed at least once during the 1-year follow-up. During follow-up, the mean number of assessments was 3.0 (SD=1.6) for STEPPS plus treatment as usual recipients and 2.8 (SD=1.3) for treatment as usual alone recipients (Mann-Whitney test: χ 2 =0.4, df=1, p=0.549). STEPPS recipients attended a mean of 12.9 (SD=5.4) group treatment sessions.

Assessment of Efficacy: Treatment Period

STEPPS plus treatment as usual recipients improved from baseline through week 20 on primary and secondary outcome measures ( Table 3 ). The mean rate of change for the STEPPS plus treatment as usual group was significantly greater relative to the treatment as usual alone group for the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder total and all four subscales, CGI severity and improvement ratings, Global Assessment Scale, Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (thoughts/feelings subscale), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, PANAS (negative affectivity subscale), Beck Depression Inventory, Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (depression, psychoticism, and global severity subscales), and Social Adjustment Scale (social/leisure subscale and total score). For other outcomes, improvement observed in the STEPPS plus treatment as usual group was greater than the treatment as usual alone group, but differences were not statistically significant.

Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures in Outpatients With Borderline Personality Disorder Randomly Assigned to STEPPS Plus Treatment as Usual or Treatment as Usual Alone

Effect sizes for the STEPPS program at 20 weeks represent group differences in mean improvement divided by the pooled standard deviations at baseline. While some assessment scales were reverse-coded (lower scores more favorable), we report all effect sizes in a positive direction. For the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder total, estimated effect size was 0.84, indicating a large effect of the STEPPS program on the primary outcome. For secondary outcome measures, effect size estimates ranged from 0.12–1.09. Generally, those of 0.50 and greater were statistically significant.

Figure 2 shows estimated means over the treatment period for the primary and selected secondary outcomes. Improvements for the STEPPS plus treatment as usual group appear to be monotonic and roughly linear. Improvements for the treatment as usual alone group appear mostly confined to the first half of the treatment period.

a The Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder was obtained at baseline, week 8, and week 20. The Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time, CGI ratings, and Beck Depression Inventory were obtained at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20.

Subjects randomly assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual had greater change in CGI severity and improvement ratings relative to those randomly assigned to treatment as usual alone. Using each subject’s last observation within the treatment period, those randomly assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual were more likely to be rated “very much” or “much” improved (40.0% versus 5.1%; χ 2 =21.0, df=1, p<0.001); subjects’ own global self-ratings showed similar results, with 58.5% of STEPPS plus treatment as usual recipients rating themselves as “very much” or “much” improved, compared with 22.0% for those assigned to treatment as usual alone (χ 2 =16.9, df=1, p<0.001). STEPPS plus treatment as usual recipients were more likely to reach the clinically relevant Global Assessment Scale cutoff (>60) (18.5% versus 5.1%; χ 2 =5.2, df=1, p=0.023).

Assessment of Efficacy: 1-Year Follow-Up

There were no statistically significant group differences across the 1-year follow-up ( Table 4 ), suggesting that treatment period gains attributed to STEPPS were maintained. Because not all subjects were assessed through the follow-up period, these analyses were less powerful than the primary analyses through week 20.

Follow-Up Comparison of Outcome Measures in Outpatients With Borderline Personality Disorder Randomly Assigned to STEPPS Plus Treatment as Usual or Treatment as Usual Alone

Using each subject’s last observation within the follow-up period, those subjects randomly assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual were still more likely to be rated “very much” or “much” improved (40.0% versus 15.6%; χ 2 = 5.5, df=1, p=0.019). However, subjects’ global self-ratings were not significantly different during the follow-up, with 55.1% of STEPPS plus treatment as usual recipients rating themselves “very much” or “much” improved, compared with 43.8% of those assigned to treatment as usual alone (χ 2 =1.0, df=1, p=0.318). Within the follow-up period, subjects in STEPPS plus treatment as usual were still more likely to reach the Global Assessment Scale score cutoff (>60) (28.0% versus 9.7%; χ 2 =3.9, df=1, p=0.049).

Medication and Individual Psychotherapy

Ninety percent of subjects reported at least one psychotropic medication at baseline. Antidepressants were reported by 42 (65%) of the STEPPS plus treatment as usual recipients and 33 (56%) of the treatment as usual alone group (χ 2 =1.0, df=1, p=0.323). Psychotropic usage significantly decreased during the 20-week treatment period for both groups (from 2.9 to 1.3 medications per subject), but there was no group difference in level of change (Mann-Whitney test: χ 2 =0.1, df=1, p=0.782). Thus, medication usage did not confound study results. Additionally, 63% of STEPPS plus treatment as usual subjects and 54% of treatment as usual alone subjects were receiving individual psychotherapy at baseline. These percentages remained relatively static during the 20-week treatment period.

Indirect Indicators of Efficacy

Subjects were asked to report crisis care utilization within the last month. Because subjects varied in their number of assessments, we report utilization statistics in terms of the number of months per year in which utilization occurred. Thus, for example, we can distinguish a subject with three utilizations over 3 months (i.e., 12 months per year with utilization) from a subject with three utilizations over 6 months (i.e., 6 months per year with utilization). Overall, 35 (28.2%) subjects had at least one hospitalization during the treatment period or follow-up. Subjects randomly assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual averaged 1.13 months per year during which hospitalization occurred, and subjects randomly assigned to treatment as usual alone averaged 1.24; the difference was not significant (binomial test: p=0.670). In addition, 43 (34.7%) subjects had at least one emergency department visit during the treatment period or follow-up. Subjects randomly assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual averaged 0.97 months per year with at least one emergency department visit, and subjects randomly assigned to treatment as usual alone averaged 1.52; the difference was significant (binomial test: p=0.040). Finally, 60 (48.4%) subjects made at least one crisis call during the treatment period or follow-up. Subjects randomly assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual averaged 2.49 months per year during which at least one crisis call was made, and subjects randomly assigned to treatment as usual alone averaged 2.31; the difference was not significant (binomial test: p=0.603).

Suicide attempt and self-harm data were available for 108 of the 124 subjects. Suicide attempts were reported by 24 subjects (22.2%), and self-harm acts were reported by 56 (45.2%) subjects during treatment and follow-up. Nearly all who attempted suicide (88%) also reported self-harm acts. Among those who attempted suicide, the median number of attempts was 1.75 per year, and the mean was 2.60. Among those who reported acts of deliberate self-harm, the median number of acts was 9.8 per year, and the mean was 16.6. Using the Cox proportional hazards model, treatment group was not associated with time to first suicide attempt (χ 2 <0.1, df=1, p=0.994) or first self-harm act (χ 2 <0.1, df=1, p=0.902).

Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 total scores at week 20 were significantly higher for the STEPPS plus treatment as usual group relative to the treatment as usual alone group (t=4.7, df=71, p<0.001), with means of 28.2 (SD=4.9) and 22.6 (SD=5.2), respectively, indicating greater satisfaction.

STEPPS plus treatment as usual was superior to treatment as usual alone in the treatment of outpatients with borderline personality disorder across a spectrum of illness-specific and global measures. These results are encouraging because they suggest that a relatively brief adjunctive program can deliver clinically meaningful benefits to persons with this disorder and improve their quality of life. STEPPS now joins several other treatment programs supported by empirical evidence and is a reminder that earlier pessimism regarding the treatment of borderline personality disorder was misplaced ( 5 – 12 ).

This treatment program helped subjects to better understand their personality disorder and gave them skills to cope with it. It may also have provided social support, hope, and therapeutic alliance, which are common factors that may be responsible for benefit from many forms of therapy ( 34 – 36 ). Further, our test of STEPPS employed features of an effectiveness study suggesting that STEPPS provides “real-world” benefit. For example, subjects were allowed to take psychotropic medication or receive individual therapy and case management.

STEPPS led to broad-based improvements that included the affective, cognitive, impulsive, and disturbed relationship domains assessed by the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder; it also had a robust antidepressant effect. Impulsivity, as measured by the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, was significantly reduced, as were negative thoughts and feelings and negative affectivity, the latter findings indicating that STEPPS recipients were less likely to feel hopeless and helpless or to have negative self-impressions. These changes reflect the emphasis of the program in that subjects are taught to regulate their intense emotions and maladaptive behaviors. Importantly, improvements were generally maintained during the follow-up, suggesting that subjects learned new skills that they used beyond the treatment period to enhance their quality of life. Nonetheless, there was regression in some scores during the follow-up for STEPPS recipients. Without the support and structure of the group, mild regression may be inevitable in some persons.

Subjects assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual had moderate to high levels of satisfaction with the program based on their Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 scores, findings congruent with our preliminary data ( 16 ). Of course, these ratings were obtained from subjects who completed the treatment study, and those who did not may have been less satisfied.

We were unable to confirm our a priori hypotheses regarding a reduction in suicidal and self-harm acts during the 20-week treatment or follow-up, although there were no suicides. Additionally, while there was less crisis utilization among those individuals receiving STEPPS, only the reduction of emergency department visits was statistically significant. It may be that a positive effect on these behaviors requires more than a 20-week program or that more intensive follow-up is needed. To this end, we have developed an adjunctive program designed to follow STEPPS, which we plan to investigate. Reductions in crisis utilization, suicide attempts, and self-harm acts reported by other researchers have generally followed at least 12 to 18 months of active treatment ( 6 – 10 ). In addition, unlike some studies ( 5 , 6 ), we did not require subjects to be suicidal at intake, and the low base rate of suicidal behaviors may have made it difficult to show a treatment effect.

There are several methodological limitations. First, we experienced a relatively high discontinuation rate. High drop-out rates are the bane of borderline personality disorder treatment trials. Bateman and Fonagy ( 8 , 9 ) claimed a rate of only 12%, as did Linehan et al. ( 6 ) in their recent dialectical behavioral therapy trial, yet substantially higher rates have been reported by others. Verheul et al. ( 7 ) reported that 34 of 58 subjects (59%) assigned to dialectical behavioral therapy or treatment as usual dropped out. While we encouraged patients to remain in the study, we neither sought a commitment nor made a systematic attempt to reduce nonattendance. Most subjects assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual were not regular attendees of our clinic, and lack of “clinic loyalty” may have contributed to dropping out. Additionally, for some subjects, travel to Iowa City for the program, particularly during winter months, may have played a role. Subjects assigned to treatment as usual alone only had to complete periodic assessments, often conducted by telephone. While we intended to conduct blind assessments, we found it nearly impossible to maintain blindness. The convergence of both rater- and patient-administered scales suggests that this may not have been an important deficiency.

Another concern is the possible confounding of results by psychotropic medication. Zanarini ( 4 ) noted that nearly all patients treated for borderline personality disorder receive psychotropic medication. This was true of our subjects. Yet, there were no differences between groups indicating that results favoring STEPPS plus treatment as usual were not because of medication. Similarly, individual psychotherapy did not appear to confound the results.

The paucity of men and minorities does not allow firm conclusions about the effectiveness of STEPPS in these groups. Nor does the study design allow conclusions about the effectiveness of STEPPS relative to other manual-based treatment programs. Additionally, the fact that we did not seek subjects with recent suicidal or self-harm behaviors limits comparison with studies that have actively recruited such persons ( 5 , 6 , 10 ).

Additional trials of STEPPS by independent research groups and testing STEPPS in other patient populations should be considered. Future studies should also address premature discontinuation and develop strategies to minimize this limitation.

Patient Perspective

“Jenny,” a 43-year-old married, Caucasian woman, was referred to the research study by her psychiatrist. She had a history of physical and emotional abuse in childhood, repetitive self-harm (mainly cutting and head banging), and multiple non-serious suicide attempts. She had been psychiatrically hospitalized more than 200 times, and she had from 5 to 10 admissions annually in recent years. She was taking nefazodone, quetiapine, gabapentin, and carbamazepine for symptom management and was engaged in individual psychotherapy. She screened positive for recurrent major depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, past panic disorder, and past anorexia nervosa in addition to her borderline personality disorder.

Jenny was randomly assigned to the active treatment arm and attended all 20 STEPPS sessions, despite having to drive a considerable distance and experiencing financial, marital, and school-related stressors. Her reinforcement team consisted of her psychiatrist and therapist but eventually expanded to include other members of the group. She gradually became less symptomatic. For example, her Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time score fell from 50 at baseline to 17 at week 20. Instead of near monthly hospitalizations, there were only three during the STEPPS program, two during the following year, and none during the past year. Likewise, there was one non-serious suicide attempt during the program and none during the following 2 years, a record for her.

With STEPPS, Jenny learned new emotion and behavior management skills. When she reached a “5” on the Emotional Intensity Continuum (indicating that she felt out of control), the group facilitators and members helped her identify the cognitive filters and related distorted thoughts that were triggered; she was then encouraged to choose and implement a skill to reduce her emotional intensity. Social undesirability, for example, was a strong cognitive filter that often led to acts of self-harm. In response, Jenny learned to use the skills of distancing and distracting to decrease her emotional intensity and to use the skill of communicating her thoughts to others and accepting feedback. As the group progressed, she was able to challenge her cognitive distortions more effectively and respond to stressful situations in a more positive way.

Jenny has since completed her schooling and is employed as a part-time school teacher and mental health advocate. She uses her STEPPS skills on a daily basis: “Although I often feel like hurting myself, I rarely act out….It’s much easier for me to bring myself down to a lower intensity level, often without the help of others.”

Acknowledgments

Dr. Black has received research support from Shire and Forest Laboratories; speaker’s bureau honoraria from Pfizer; and honoraria for other consulting from Forest Laboratories and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Mr. St. John has received honoraria for consulting from AstraZeneca and Wyeth. Ms. Blum, Mr. St. John, and Dr. Pfohl have received royalties from Ms. Blum’s books for sales of the STEPPS CD-ROM. Drs. Allen, Arndt, and Stuart and Mr. McCormick report no competing interests.

Supported by grant MH-63746 from NIMH (Dr. Black).

The authors thank Wayne Bowers, Ph.D., and Scott Temple, Ph.D., for their contributions to the study. The authors also thank Jo Ann Franklin, B.A., and Rebecca Hansel for data collection and data entry; Peggy Loveless, Ph.D., for help with data analysis; and Russell Noyes, M.D., for editorial suggestions.

Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, San Diego, Calif., May 2007, and the 10th Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Personality Disorders, Hague, the Netherlands, Sept. 2007.

Clinical Trials Registry number 00055315.

• Search Menu

Sign in through your institution

• Browse content in Arts and Humanities
• Browse content in Archaeology
• Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Archaeology
• Archaeological Methodology and Techniques
• Archaeology by Region
• Archaeology of Religion
• Archaeology of Trade and Exchange
• Biblical Archaeology
• Contemporary and Public Archaeology
• Environmental Archaeology
• Historical Archaeology
• History and Theory of Archaeology
• Industrial Archaeology
• Landscape Archaeology
• Mortuary Archaeology
• Prehistoric Archaeology
• Underwater Archaeology
• Zooarchaeology
• Browse content in Architecture
• Architectural Structure and Design
• History of Architecture
• Residential and Domestic Buildings
• Theory of Architecture
• Browse content in Art
• Art Subjects and Themes
• History of Art
• Industrial and Commercial Art
• Theory of Art
• Biographical Studies
• Byzantine Studies
• Browse content in Classical Studies
• Classical Numismatics
• Classical Literature
• Classical Reception
• Classical History
• Classical Philosophy
• Classical Mythology
• Classical Art and Architecture
• Classical Oratory and Rhetoric
• Greek and Roman Archaeology
• Greek and Roman Epigraphy
• Greek and Roman Law
• Greek and Roman Papyrology
• Late Antiquity
• Religion in the Ancient World
• Social History
• Digital Humanities
• Browse content in History
• Colonialism and Imperialism
• Diplomatic History
• Environmental History
• Genealogy, Heraldry, Names, and Honours
• Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing
• Historical Geography
• History by Period
• History of Agriculture
• History of Education
• History of Emotions
• History of Gender and Sexuality
• Industrial History
• Intellectual History
• International History
• Labour History
• Legal and Constitutional History
• Local and Family History
• Maritime History
• Military History
• National Liberation and Post-Colonialism
• Oral History
• Political History
• Public History
• Regional and National History
• Revolutions and Rebellions
• Slavery and Abolition of Slavery
• Social and Cultural History
• Theory, Methods, and Historiography
• Urban History
• World History
• Browse content in Language Teaching and Learning
• Language Learning (Specific Skills)
• Language Teaching Theory and Methods
• Browse content in Linguistics
• Applied Linguistics
• Cognitive Linguistics
• Computational Linguistics
• Forensic Linguistics
• Grammar, Syntax and Morphology
• Historical and Diachronic Linguistics
• History of English
• Language Variation
• Language Families
• Language Acquisition
• Language Evolution
• Language Reference
• Lexicography
• Linguistic Theories
• Linguistic Typology
• Linguistic Anthropology
• Phonetics and Phonology
• Psycholinguistics
• Sociolinguistics
• Translation and Interpretation
• Writing Systems
• Browse content in Literature
• Bibliography
• Children's Literature Studies
• Literary Studies (Modernism)
• Literary Studies (Asian)
• Literary Studies (European)
• Literary Studies (Eco-criticism)
• Literary Studies (Romanticism)
• Literary Studies (American)
• Literary Studies - World
• Literary Studies (1500 to 1800)
• Literary Studies (19th Century)
• Literary Studies (20th Century onwards)
• Literary Studies (African American Literature)
• Literary Studies (British and Irish)
• Literary Studies (Early and Medieval)
• Literary Studies (Fiction, Novelists, and Prose Writers)
• Literary Studies (Gender Studies)
• Literary Studies (Graphic Novels)
• Literary Studies (History of the Book)
• Literary Studies (Plays and Playwrights)
• Literary Studies (Poetry and Poets)
• Literary Studies (Postcolonial Literature)
• Literary Studies (Queer Studies)
• Literary Studies (Science Fiction)
• Literary Studies (Travel Literature)
• Literary Studies (War Literature)
• Literary Studies (Women's Writing)
• Literary Theory and Cultural Studies
• Mythology and Folklore
• Shakespeare Studies and Criticism
• Browse content in Media Studies
• Browse content in Music
• Applied Music
• Dance and Music
• Ethics in Music
• Ethnomusicology
• Gender and Sexuality in Music
• Medicine and Music
• Music Cultures
• Music and Culture
• Music and Religion
• Music and Media
• Music Education and Pedagogy
• Music Theory and Analysis
• Musical Scores, Lyrics, and Libretti
• Musical Structures, Styles, and Techniques
• Musicology and Music History
• Performance Practice and Studies
• Race and Ethnicity in Music
• Sound Studies
• Browse content in Performing Arts
• Browse content in Philosophy
• Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art
• Epistemology
• Feminist Philosophy
• History of Western Philosophy
• Metaphysics
• Moral Philosophy
• Non-Western Philosophy
• Philosophy of Action
• Philosophy of Law
• Philosophy of Religion
• Philosophy of Science
• Philosophy of Language
• Philosophy of Mind
• Philosophy of Perception
• Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic
• Practical Ethics
• Social and Political Philosophy
• Browse content in Religion
• Biblical Studies
• Christianity
• East Asian Religions
• History of Religion
• Judaism and Jewish Studies
• Qumran Studies
• Religion and Education
• Religion and Health
• Religion and Politics
• Religion and Science
• Religion and Law
• Religion and Art, Literature, and Music
• Religious Studies
• Browse content in Society and Culture
• Cookery, Food, and Drink
• Cultural Studies
• Customs and Traditions
• Ethical Issues and Debates
• Hobbies, Games, Arts and Crafts
• Natural world, Country Life, and Pets
• Popular Beliefs and Controversial Knowledge
• Sports and Outdoor Recreation
• Technology and Society
• Travel and Holiday
• Visual Culture
• Browse content in Law
• Arbitration
• Browse content in Company and Commercial Law
• Commercial Law
• Company Law
• Browse content in Comparative Law
• Systems of Law
• Competition Law
• Browse content in Constitutional and Administrative Law
• Government Powers
• Judicial Review
• Local Government Law
• Military and Defence Law
• Parliamentary and Legislative Practice
• Construction Law
• Contract Law
• Browse content in Criminal Law
• Criminal Procedure
• Criminal Evidence Law
• Sentencing and Punishment
• Employment and Labour Law
• Environment and Energy Law
• Browse content in Financial Law
• Banking Law
• Insolvency Law
• History of Law
• Human Rights and Immigration
• Intellectual Property Law
• Browse content in International Law
• Private International Law and Conflict of Laws
• Public International Law
• IT and Communications Law
• Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law
• Law and Society
• Law and Politics
• Browse content in Legal System and Practice
• Courts and Procedure
• Legal Skills and Practice
• Legal System - Costs and Funding
• Primary Sources of Law
• Regulation of Legal Profession
• Medical and Healthcare Law
• Browse content in Policing
• Criminal Investigation and Detection
• Police and Security Services
• Police Procedure and Law
• Police Regional Planning
• Browse content in Property Law
• Personal Property Law
• Restitution
• Study and Revision
• Terrorism and National Security Law
• Browse content in Trusts Law
• Wills and Probate or Succession
• Browse content in Medicine and Health
• Browse content in Allied Health Professions
• Arts Therapies
• Clinical Science
• Dietetics and Nutrition
• Occupational Therapy
• Operating Department Practice
• Physiotherapy
• Radiography
• Speech and Language Therapy
• Browse content in Anaesthetics
• General Anaesthesia
• Browse content in Clinical Medicine
• Acute Medicine
• Cardiovascular Medicine
• Clinical Genetics
• Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
• Dermatology
• Endocrinology and Diabetes
• Gastroenterology
• Genito-urinary Medicine
• Geriatric Medicine
• Infectious Diseases
• Medical Oncology
• Medical Toxicology
• Pain Medicine
• Palliative Medicine
• Rehabilitation Medicine
• Respiratory Medicine and Pulmonology
• Rheumatology
• Sleep Medicine
• Sports and Exercise Medicine
• Clinical Neuroscience
• Community Medical Services
• Critical Care
• Emergency Medicine
• Forensic Medicine
• Haematology
• History of Medicine
• Medical Ethics
• Browse content in Medical Dentistry
• Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
• Paediatric Dentistry
• Restorative Dentistry and Orthodontics
• Surgical Dentistry
• Browse content in Medical Skills
• Clinical Skills
• Communication Skills
• Nursing Skills
• Surgical Skills
• Medical Statistics and Methodology
• Browse content in Neurology
• Clinical Neurophysiology
• Neuropathology
• Nursing Studies
• Browse content in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
• Gynaecology
• Occupational Medicine
• Ophthalmology
• Otolaryngology (ENT)
• Browse content in Paediatrics
• Neonatology
• Browse content in Pathology
• Chemical Pathology
• Clinical Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics
• Histopathology
• Medical Microbiology and Virology
• Patient Education and Information
• Browse content in Pharmacology
• Psychopharmacology
• Browse content in Popular Health
• Caring for Others
• Complementary and Alternative Medicine
• Self-help and Personal Development
• Browse content in Preclinical Medicine
• Cell Biology
• Molecular Biology and Genetics
• Reproduction, Growth and Development
• Primary Care
• Professional Development in Medicine
• Browse content in Psychiatry
• Addiction Medicine
• Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
• Forensic Psychiatry
• Learning Disabilities
• Old Age Psychiatry
• Psychotherapy
• Browse content in Public Health and Epidemiology
• Epidemiology
• Public Health
• Browse content in Radiology
• Clinical Radiology
• Interventional Radiology
• Nuclear Medicine
• Radiation Oncology
• Reproductive Medicine
• Browse content in Surgery
• Cardiothoracic Surgery
• Gastro-intestinal and Colorectal Surgery
• General Surgery
• Neurosurgery
• Paediatric Surgery
• Peri-operative Care
• Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• Surgical Oncology
• Transplant Surgery
• Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery
• Vascular Surgery
• Browse content in Science and Mathematics
• Browse content in Biological Sciences
• Aquatic Biology
• Biochemistry
• Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
• Developmental Biology
• Ecology and Conservation
• Evolutionary Biology
• Genetics and Genomics
• Microbiology
• Molecular and Cell Biology
• Natural History
• Plant Sciences and Forestry
• Research Methods in Life Sciences
• Structural Biology
• Systems Biology
• Zoology and Animal Sciences
• Browse content in Chemistry
• Analytical Chemistry
• Computational Chemistry
• Crystallography
• Environmental Chemistry
• Industrial Chemistry
• Inorganic Chemistry
• Materials Chemistry
• Medicinal Chemistry
• Mineralogy and Gems
• Organic Chemistry
• Physical Chemistry
• Polymer Chemistry
• Study and Communication Skills in Chemistry
• Theoretical Chemistry
• Browse content in Computer Science
• Artificial Intelligence
• Computer Architecture and Logic Design
• Game Studies
• Human-Computer Interaction
• Mathematical Theory of Computation
• Programming Languages
• Software Engineering
• Systems Analysis and Design
• Virtual Reality
• Browse content in Computing
• Business Applications
• Computer Games
• Computer Security
• Computer Networking and Communications
• Digital Lifestyle
• Graphical and Digital Media Applications
• Operating Systems
• Browse content in Earth Sciences and Geography
• Atmospheric Sciences
• Environmental Geography
• Geology and the Lithosphere
• Maps and Map-making
• Meteorology and Climatology
• Oceanography and Hydrology
• Palaeontology
• Physical Geography and Topography
• Regional Geography
• Soil Science
• Urban Geography
• Browse content in Engineering and Technology
• Agriculture and Farming
• Biological Engineering
• Civil Engineering, Surveying, and Building
• Electronics and Communications Engineering
• Energy Technology
• Engineering (General)
• Environmental Science, Engineering, and Technology
• History of Engineering and Technology
• Mechanical Engineering and Materials
• Technology of Industrial Chemistry
• Transport Technology and Trades
• Browse content in Environmental Science
• Applied Ecology (Environmental Science)
• Conservation of the Environment (Environmental Science)
• Environmental Sustainability
• Environmentalist Thought and Ideology (Environmental Science)
• Management of Land and Natural Resources (Environmental Science)
• Natural Disasters (Environmental Science)
• Nuclear Issues (Environmental Science)
• Pollution and Threats to the Environment (Environmental Science)
• Social Impact of Environmental Issues (Environmental Science)
• History of Science and Technology
• Browse content in Materials Science
• Ceramics and Glasses
• Composite Materials
• Metals, Alloying, and Corrosion
• Nanotechnology
• Browse content in Mathematics
• Applied Mathematics
• Biomathematics and Statistics
• History of Mathematics
• Mathematical Education
• Mathematical Finance
• Mathematical Analysis
• Numerical and Computational Mathematics
• Probability and Statistics
• Pure Mathematics
• Browse content in Neuroscience
• Cognition and Behavioural Neuroscience
• Development of the Nervous System
• Disorders of the Nervous System
• History of Neuroscience
• Invertebrate Neurobiology
• Molecular and Cellular Systems
• Neuroendocrinology and Autonomic Nervous System
• Neuroscientific Techniques
• Sensory and Motor Systems
• Browse content in Physics
• Astronomy and Astrophysics
• Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
• Biological and Medical Physics
• Classical Mechanics
• Computational Physics
• Condensed Matter Physics
• Electromagnetism, Optics, and Acoustics
• History of Physics
• Mathematical and Statistical Physics
• Measurement Science
• Nuclear Physics
• Particles and Fields
• Plasma Physics
• Quantum Physics
• Relativity and Gravitation
• Semiconductor and Mesoscopic Physics
• Browse content in Psychology
• Affective Sciences
• Clinical Psychology
• Cognitive Neuroscience
• Cognitive Psychology
• Criminal and Forensic Psychology
• Developmental Psychology
• Educational Psychology
• Evolutionary Psychology
• Health Psychology
• History and Systems in Psychology
• Music Psychology
• Neuropsychology
• Organizational Psychology
• Psychological Assessment and Testing
• Psychology of Human-Technology Interaction
• Psychology Professional Development and Training
• Research Methods in Psychology
• Social Psychology
• Browse content in Social Sciences
• Browse content in Anthropology
• Anthropology of Religion
• Human Evolution
• Medical Anthropology
• Physical Anthropology
• Regional Anthropology
• Social and Cultural Anthropology
• Theory and Practice of Anthropology
• Browse content in Business and Management
• Business History
• Business Strategy
• Business Ethics
• Business and Government
• Business and Technology
• Business and the Environment
• Comparative Management
• Corporate Governance
• Corporate Social Responsibility
• Entrepreneurship
• Health Management
• Human Resource Management
• Industrial and Employment Relations
• Industry Studies
• Information and Communication Technologies
• International Business
• Knowledge Management
• Management and Management Techniques
• Operations Management
• Organizational Theory and Behaviour
• Pensions and Pension Management
• Public and Nonprofit Management
• Social Issues in Business and Management
• Strategic Management
• Supply Chain Management
• Browse content in Criminology and Criminal Justice
• Criminal Justice
• Criminology
• Forms of Crime
• International and Comparative Criminology
• Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice
• Development Studies
• Browse content in Economics
• Agricultural, Environmental, and Natural Resource Economics
• Asian Economics
• Behavioural Finance
• Behavioural Economics and Neuroeconomics
• Econometrics and Mathematical Economics
• Economic Methodology
• Economic Systems
• Economic History
• Economic Development and Growth
• Financial Markets
• Financial Institutions and Services
• General Economics and Teaching
• Health, Education, and Welfare
• History of Economic Thought
• International Economics
• Labour and Demographic Economics
• Law and Economics
• Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics
• Microeconomics
• Public Economics
• Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
• Welfare Economics
• Browse content in Education
• Adult Education and Continuous Learning
• Care and Counselling of Students
• Early Childhood and Elementary Education
• Educational Equipment and Technology
• Educational Strategies and Policy
• Higher and Further Education
• Organization and Management of Education
• Philosophy and Theory of Education
• Schools Studies
• Secondary Education
• Teaching of a Specific Subject
• Teaching of Specific Groups and Special Educational Needs
• Teaching Skills and Techniques
• Browse content in Environment
• Applied Ecology (Social Science)
• Climate Change
• Conservation of the Environment (Social Science)
• Environmentalist Thought and Ideology (Social Science)
• Management of Land and Natural Resources (Social Science)
• Natural Disasters (Environment)
• Pollution and Threats to the Environment (Social Science)
• Social Impact of Environmental Issues (Social Science)
• Sustainability
• Browse content in Human Geography
• Cultural Geography
• Economic Geography
• Political Geography
• Browse content in Interdisciplinary Studies
• Communication Studies
• Museums, Libraries, and Information Sciences
• Browse content in Politics
• African Politics
• Asian Politics
• Chinese Politics
• Comparative Politics
• Conflict Politics
• Elections and Electoral Studies
• Environmental Politics
• Ethnic Politics
• European Union
• Foreign Policy
• Gender and Politics
• Human Rights and Politics
• Indian Politics
• International Relations
• International Organization (Politics)
• Irish Politics
• Latin American Politics
• Middle Eastern Politics
• Political Theory
• Political Methodology
• Political Communication
• Political Philosophy
• Political Sociology
• Political Behaviour
• Political Economy
• Political Institutions
• Politics and Law
• Politics of Development
• Public Administration
• Public Policy
• Qualitative Political Methodology
• Quantitative Political Methodology
• Regional Political Studies
• Russian Politics
• Security Studies
• State and Local Government
• UK Politics
• US Politics
• Browse content in Regional and Area Studies
• African Studies
• Asian Studies
• East Asian Studies
• Japanese Studies
• Latin American Studies
• Middle Eastern Studies
• Native American Studies
• Scottish Studies
• Browse content in Research and Information
• Research Methods
• Browse content in Social Work
• Addictions and Substance Misuse
• Adoption and Fostering
• Care of the Elderly
• Child and Adolescent Social Work
• Couple and Family Social Work
• Direct Practice and Clinical Social Work
• Emergency Services
• Human Behaviour and the Social Environment
• International and Global Issues in Social Work
• Mental and Behavioural Health
• Social Justice and Human Rights
• Social Policy and Advocacy
• Social Work and Crime and Justice
• Social Work Macro Practice
• Social Work Practice Settings
• Social Work Research and Evidence-based Practice
• Welfare and Benefit Systems
• Browse content in Sociology
• Childhood Studies
• Community Development
• Comparative and Historical Sociology
• Disability Studies
• Economic Sociology
• Gender and Sexuality
• Gerontology and Ageing
• Health, Illness, and Medicine
• Marriage and the Family
• Migration Studies
• Occupations, Professions, and Work
• Organizations
• Population and Demography
• Race and Ethnicity
• Social Theory
• Social Movements and Social Change
• Social Research and Statistics
• Social Stratification, Inequality, and Mobility
• Sociology of Religion
• Sociology of Education
• Sport and Leisure
• Urban and Rural Studies
• Browse content in Warfare and Defence
• Defence Strategy, Planning, and Research
• Land Forces and Warfare
• Military Administration
• Military Life and Institutions
• Naval Forces and Warfare
• Other Warfare and Defence Issues
• Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution
• Weapons and Equipment

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving for Borderline Personality Disorder: Implementing STEPPS Around the Globe

Professor of Psychiatry

Adjunct Instructor of Psychiatry

• Cite Icon Cite
• Permissions Icon Permissions

This edited, multi-authored text brings together all that is known about Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS), a group treatment program for outpatients with borderline personality disorder. The book describes the program, the evidence that is supportive of STEPPS, and its implementation in a variety of settings and countries. Created at the University of Iowa in 1995, STEPPS combines cognitive-behavioral therapy, skills training, and psychoeducation with a systems component for family, friends, and significant others. The 5-month-long program is easily learned and delivered by therapists from a wide range of theoretical orientations. Data show that STEPPS is effective and produces clinically important improvement. The program is well accepted by patients and therapists. STEPPS is listed in the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA) National Registry of Evidence-based Practices (NREPP). The program is embraced by the health care systems in the United Kingdom and The Netherlands and is used in correctional settings.

Personal account

• Sign in with email/username & password
• Get email alerts
• Save searches
• Purchase content
• Activate your purchase/trial code
• Add your ORCID iD

Institutional access

Sign in with a library card.

• Sign in with username/password
• Recommend to your librarian
• Institutional account management
• Get help with access

Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:

IP based access

Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.

Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.

• Click Sign in through your institution.
• Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in.
• When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
• Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.

If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.

Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.

Society Members

Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:

Sign in through society site

Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:

• Click Sign in through society site.
• When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.

If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.

Sign in using a personal account

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.

A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.

Viewing your signed in accounts

Click the account icon in the top right to:

• View your signed in personal account and access account management features.
• View the institutional accounts that are providing access.

Signed in but can't access content

Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.

For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.

Our books are available by subscription or purchase to libraries and institutions.

• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Rights and permissions
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS)

• First Online: 01 January 2014

Cite this chapter

• Renee Harvey 3 ,
• Nancee Blum 4 , 5 ,
• Donald W. Black 4 , 5 ,
• Jo Burgess 6 &
• Paula Henley-Cragg 7  

6575 Accesses

2 Citations

STEPPS (Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving) is a manualized, cognitive-behavioral, skills-based group treatment program originally developed in the USA for adults with borderline personality disorder (BPD) (Black, Blum, Pfohl, & St. John, 2004, 2012; Blum, Bartels, St. John, & Pfohl, 2002); the manual was also adapted for use in the UK (Blum, Bartels, St. John, & Pfohl, 2009), and the program is widely used in the Netherlands under the title VERS (Van Wel et al., 2006). The program is evidence based, as designated by the National Registry for Evidence-Based Practices (NREPP 2012). Although it was originally conceptualized as an outpatient program, STEPPS has been successfully adapted and implemented in a variety of settings, including inpatient units, partial hospital, day treatment programs, residential treatment facilities, substance abuse treatment, and correctional settings, including both male and female offenders in prisons and community corrections. In this chapter, an adaptation of STEPPS for adolescents in the UK will be described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Battles of the Comfort Zone: Modelling Therapeutic Strategy, Alliance, and Epistemic Trust—A Qualitative Study of Mentalization-Based Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder

Advancing the treatment of long-lasting borderline personality disorder: a feasibility and acceptability study of an expanded DBT-based skills intervention

The effects of on-line systems training for emotional predictability and problem solving (stepps) on impulsivity and self-destructive behaviors of women with borderline personality disorder.

American Psychiatric Association, (2004). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th Ed. Text Revision) (DSM-IV-TR). Arlington: American Psychiatric Press.

Google Scholar  

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th Ed.) (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

Black, D. W., Blum, N., McCormick, B., & Allen, J. (2013). Systems training for emotional predictability and problem solving (STEPPS) group treatment for offenders with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 201 , 1–6.

Black, D. W., Blum, N., Eichinger, L., McCormick, B., Allen, J., & Sieleni, B. (2008). STEPPS: Systems training for emotional predictability and problem solving in women offenders with borderline personality disorder in prison—A pilot study. CNS Spectrums, 13 , 881–886.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

Black, D. W., Blum, N., Pfohl, B., & St. John, D. (2004). The STEPPS Group Treatment Program for Outpatients with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 34 , 193–210.

Article   Google Scholar  

Blum, N. S., Bartels, N. E, St. John, D., & Pfohl, B. (2009). Systems training for emotional predictability and problem solving (STEPPS UK): Group treatment program for borderline personality disorder. Coralville, IA: Level One Publishing (Blums Books). Retrieved from www.steppsforbpd.com

Blum, N. S., Bartels, N. E, St. John, D., & Pfohl, B. (2012). Systems training for emotional predictability and problem solving (STEPPS second edition): Group treatment program for borderline personality disorder . Coralville, IA: Level One Publishing (Blums Books). Retrieved from www.steppsforbpd.com

Blum, N., Bartels, N., St. John, D., & Pfohl, B. (2002). STEPPS: Systems training for emotional predictability and problem solving: group treatment for borderline personality disorder . Coralville, IA: Blum’s Books.

Blum, N., Pfohl, B., St. John, D., Monahan, P., & Black, D. W. (2002). STEPPS: A cognitive behavioral systems-based group treatment for outpatients with borderline personality disorder—A preliminary report. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 43 , 301–310.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Blum, N., & St. John, D. (2008) . STAIRWAYS—The next step in treatment for borderline personality disorder . Coralville, IA: Level One Publishing (Blums Books). Retrieved from www.steppsforbpdcom

Blum, N., St. John, D., Pfohl, B., Stuart, S., McCormick, B., Allen, J., et al. (2008). Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) for outpatients with borderline personality disorder: A randomized controlled trial and 1-year follow-up. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165 , 468–478.

Article   PubMed Central   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Boccalon, S., Alesiani, R., Giarolli, L., Franchini, C., Columbo, C., Blum, N., et al. (2012). Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS): theoretical model, clinical applications and preliminary efficacy data in a sample of inpatients with personality disorders in comorbidity with mood disorders. Giornale di Psicopatologia . Retrieved from www.jpsychopathol.net

Freije, H., Dietz, B., & Appelo, M. (2002). Behandeling van de borderline persoonlijkheidsstoornis met de Vers: de Vaardigheidstraining emotionele regulatiestoornis. Directive Therapies, 4 , 367–378.

Harvey, R., Black, D. W., & Blum, N. (2010). Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) in the United Kingdom: A preliminary report. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40 , 225–232.

Linehan, M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder . New York: Guilford.

Schuppert, H. M., Giesen-Bloo, J., van Gemert, T. G., Wiersema, H. M., Minderaa, R. B., Emmelkamp, P. M., et al. (2009). Effectiveness of an emotion regulation group training for adolescents—A randomized controlled pilot study. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy., 16 (6), 467.

Millon, T., Millon, C., Davis, R., & Grossman, S. (1993/2006). The Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory (MACI™). Pearson. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/HAIWEB/Cultures/en-us/Productdetail.htm?Pid=PAg501

Pfohl, B., Blum, N., McCormick, B., St. John, D., Allen, J., & Black, D. W. (2009). Reliability and validity of the borderline evaluation of severity over time: A new scale to measure severity and change in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23 , 281–293.

Sperry, L. (2003). Handbook of diagnosis and treatment of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Brunner-Routledge.

Book   Google Scholar  

Van Wel, B., Bos, E. H., Appelo, M. T., Berendsen, E. M., Willgeroth, F. C., & Verbraak, M. J. P. M. (2009). De effectiviteit van de vaardigheidstraining Emotieregulatiestoornis (VERS) in de behandeling van de Borderlinepersoonlijkheidsstoornis; een gerandomiseerd onderzoek. Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie, 51 , 5.

Van Wel, B., Kockmann, I., Blum, N., Pfohl, B., Black, D. W., & Heesterman, W. (2006). STEPPS group treatment for borderline personality disorder in The Netherlands. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 18 , 63–67.

Yeomans, F. E., Gutfreund, J., Selzer, M. A., Clarkin, J. F., Hull, J. W., & Smith, T. E. (1994). Factors related to drop-outs by borderline patients. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 3 , 16–24.

PubMed Central   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Suggested Reading

Blum, N., & Black, D. W. (2008). The STEPPS group treatment for borderline personality disorder. In P. D. Hoffman, & P. Steiner-Grossman (Eds.), Borderline personality disorder: meeting the challenges to successful treatment (published simultaneously as Social Work in Mental Health 2008, 6, 171–186). Binghampton, NY: The Haworth Press.

Blum, N., & Pfohl, B. (2006). Volatile Vivian (Borderline Personality Disorder). In R. Spitzer, J. Williams, M. Gibbon, & M. First (Eds.), DSM-IV-TR treatment casebook: Experts tell how they treated their patients (pp. 391–402). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

Dowrick, C., Blum, N., & Pfohl, B. (2008). Psychoeducational treatments. In: P. Tyrer, & K. Silk (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of effective treatments in psychiatry (pp. 116–131). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

With thanks to Charlotte Wilcox, Research Assistant, Group co-facilitators Jude Jarrett (Clinical Psychologist) and Tansy Walker (Clinical Psychologist), and Stephanie Field who provided administrative support.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Bluebell House, Recovery Support Centre, Royal George Road, Burgess Hill, RH15 9NZ, West Sussex, Great Britain

Renee Harvey

Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA

Nancee Blum & Donald W. Black

Iowa Department of Corrections, Des Moines, IA, USA

Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, Sussex Partnership NHs Foundation Trust, Burgess Hill, West Sussex, Great Britain

Worthing Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Burgess Hill, West Sussex, Great Britain

Paula Henley-Cragg

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renee Harvey .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Dept. Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA

Carla Sharp

Jennifer L. Tackett

Appendix: A “Typical” STEPPS Lesson

Every STEPPS lesson is structured according to an agenda, which is handed out with the notes. The agendas are all broadly similar. This provides a predicable pattern, which helps the participant to feel less anxious and enables them to concentrate on the new material being presented each week.

Described here is Lesson 10, which is the first of two on “Managing Problems.” By this stage, the participant has been introduced to the concept of emotional intensity difficulties (as an alternative to a diagnosis of BPD) and has been given a series of emotion management skills to underpin the work on behavior change to follow (See Chap. 27 for a description of these). Comments in square brackets explain the process.

Complete a QuEST scale and record the score [Symptom measure which is done weekly]

Relaxation [A brief relaxation session, each week introducing a different method so that participants have a choice]

Review EIC [Here there is an opportunity for participants to describe how the past week has been, and for the group to share how they have filled in the 5-point EIC form relative to any incidents they experienced. There is usually an example done in the lesson on the whiteboard, with all encouraged to comment, make suggestions, and share their own responses.]

Review Skills Monitoring Card [Participants have been encouraged to use a tick list of skills every day.]

Review of homework exercises from the previous week.

Presentation of the week’s lesson and homework exercises.

In the Managing Problems lesson, participants begin with problem identification and potential solution strategies, but with particular attention paid to understanding the role of “filters” (schemas/core beliefs) in contributing to the intensity of their reactions and the obstacles in their way. All the skills learned so far are brought to bear in understanding how they might find a possible solution and how to overcome resistances and self-sabotaging which may have played a role in past failures. The group contributes by making suggestions, encouraging each other, and sharing experiences of what has been helpful for them. In the lessons to come, feedback from each of the previous lesson is used to build the skills of the next.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Harvey, R., Blum, N., Black, D.W., Burgess, J., Henley-Cragg, P. (2014). Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS). In: Sharp, C., Tackett, J. (eds) Handbook of Borderline Personality Disorder in Children and Adolescents. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0591-1_26

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0591-1_26

Published : 28 March 2014

Publisher Name : Springer, New York, NY

Print ISBN : 978-1-4939-0590-4

Online ISBN : 978-1-4939-0591-1

eBook Packages : Behavioral Science Behavioral Science and Psychology (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) for Outpatients With Borderline Personality Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial and 1-Year Follow-Up

Information & authors, metrics & citations, view options, assessments, treatment assignment, stepps program.

Treatment as Usual

Statistical analysis.

Assessment of Efficacy: Treatment Period

Assessment of Efficacy: 1-Year Follow-Up

Medication and Individual Psychotherapy

Indirect indicators of efficacy.

Information

Published in.

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu .

To download the citation to this article, select your reference manager software.

There are no citations for this item

View options

Login options.

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR ® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Share article link

Copying failed.

PREVIOUS ARTICLE

Next article, request username.

Can't sign in? Forgot your username? Enter your email address below and we will send you your username

If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username

Create a new account

Change password, password changed successfully.

Your password has been changed

Reset password

Can't sign in? Forgot your password?

Enter your email address below and we will send you the reset instructions

If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password.

Your Phone has been verified

As described within the American Psychiatric Association (APA)'s Privacy Policy and Terms of Use , this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences. Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

• Health, Fitness & Dieting
• Mental Health

Sorry, there was a problem.

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving for Borderline Personality Disorder: Implementing STEPPS Around the Globe 1st Edition

• ISBN-10 9780199384426
• ISBN-13 978-0199384426
• Edition 1st
• Publisher Oxford University Press
• Publication date January 16, 2017
• Language English
• Dimensions 1 x 6.4 x 9.3 inches
• Print length 224 pages
• See all details

Products related to this item

Editorial Reviews

About the author, product details.

• ASIN ‏ : ‎ 0199384428
• Publisher ‏ : ‎ Oxford University Press; 1st edition (January 16, 2017)
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Hardcover ‏ : ‎ 224 pages
• ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 9780199384426
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0199384426
• Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 2.31 pounds
• Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 1 x 6.4 x 9.3 inches
• #1,152 in Clinical Psychology (Books)
• #1,515 in Personality Disorders (Books)
• #5,196 in Medical Clinical Psychology

Customer reviews

• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 5 star 46% 0% 27% 0% 27% 46%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 4 star 46% 0% 27% 0% 27% 0%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 3 star 46% 0% 27% 0% 27% 27%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 2 star 46% 0% 27% 0% 27% 0%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 1 star 46% 0% 27% 0% 27% 27%

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

No customer reviews

• About Amazon
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Sell products on Amazon
• Sell on Amazon Business
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Become an Affiliate
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Host an Amazon Hub
• › See More Make Money with Us
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Amazon and COVID-19
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices

• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) for outpatients with borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial and 1-year follow-up

Affiliation.

• 1 Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
• PMID: 18281407
• PMCID: PMC3608469
• DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07071079
• Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;165(6):777

Objective: Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) is a 20-week manual-based group treatment program for outpatients with borderline personality disorder that combines cognitive behavioral elements and skills training with a systems component. The authors compared STEPPS plus treatment as usual with treatment as usual alone in a randomized controlled trial.

Method: Subjects with borderline personality disorder were randomly assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual or treatment as usual alone. Total score on the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included measures of global functioning, depression, impulsivity, and social functioning; suicide attempts and self-harm acts; and crisis utilization. Subjects were followed 1 year posttreatment. A linear mixed-effects model was used in the analysis.

Results: Data pertaining to 124 subjects (STEPPS plus treatment as usual [N=65]; treatment as usual alone [N=59]) were analyzed. Subjects assigned to STEPPS plus treatment as usual experienced greater improvement in the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder total score and subscales assessing affective, cognitive, interpersonal, and impulsive domains. STEPPS plus treatment as usual also led to greater improvements in impulsivity, negative affectivity, mood, and global functioning. These differences yielded moderate to large effect sizes. There were no differences between groups for suicide attempts, self-harm acts, or hospitalizations. Most gains attributed to STEPPS were maintained during follow-up. Fewer STEPPS plus treatment as usual subjects had emergency department visits during treatment and follow-up. The discontinuation rate was high in both groups.

Conclusions: STEPPS, an adjunctive group treatment, can deliver clinically meaningful improvements in borderline personality disorder-related symptoms and behaviors, enhance global functioning, and relieve depression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Consort Diagram of Patient Flow…

Consort Diagram of Patient Flow in the Randomized Controlled Trial

FIGURE 2. Mean Primary and Secondary Outcome…

FIGURE 2. Mean Primary and Secondary Outcome Measure Scores a

• Augmenting psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: the STEPPS program. Silk KR. Silk KR. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;165(4):413-5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08010102. Am J Psychiatry. 2008. PMID: 18381909 No abstract available.
• Effectiveness of adjunctive STEPPS group treatment in borderline personality disorder patients. Schulte-Herbrüggen O, Koerting J, Roepke S. Schulte-Herbrüggen O, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;165(10):1354; author reply 1354-5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08030390. Am J Psychiatry. 2008. PMID: 18829887 No abstract available.
• Borderline personality disorder: STEPPS improves symptoms. Davidson KM. Davidson KM. Evid Based Ment Health. 2008 Nov;11(4):120. doi: 10.1136/ebmh.11.4.120. Evid Based Ment Health. 2008. PMID: 18952969 No abstract available.

Similar articles

• STEPPS treatment programme for borderline personality disorder: Which scale items improve? An item-level analysis. Black DW, Blum N, Allen J. Black DW, et al. Personal Ment Health. 2018 Nov;12(4):345-354. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1431. Epub 2018 Aug 28. Personal Ment Health. 2018. PMID: 30152603 Clinical Trial.
• [The efficacy of the systems training for emotional predictability and problem solving (STEPPS) in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. A randomized controlled trial]. van Wel EB, Bos EH, Appelo MT, Berendsen EM, Willgeroth FC, Verbraak MJ. van Wel EB, et al. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2009;51(5):291-301. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2009. PMID: 19434566 Clinical Trial. Dutch.
• Effectiveness of Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) for borderline personality problems in a 'real-world' sample: moderation by diagnosis or severity? Bos EH, van Wel EB, Appelo MT, Verbraak MJ. Bos EH, et al. Psychother Psychosom. 2011;80(3):173-81. doi: 10.1159/000321793. Epub 2011 Mar 9. Psychother Psychosom. 2011. PMID: 21389754 Clinical Trial.
• Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. Stoffers JM, Völlm BA, Rücker G, Timmer A, Huband N, Lieb K. Stoffers JM, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD005652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005652.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22895952 Free PMC article. Review.
• STEPPS group treatment for borderline personality disorder in The Netherlands. Van Wel B, Kockmann I, Blum N, Pfohl B, Black DW, Heesterman W. Van Wel B, et al. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Jan-Mar;18(1):63-7. doi: 10.1080/10401230500464760. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2006. PMID: 16517455 Review.
• Short-Term versus Long-Term Mentalization-Based Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial (MBT-RCT). Juul S, Jakobsen JC, Hestbaek E, Jørgensen CK, Olsen MH, Rishede M, Frandsen FW, Bo S, Lunn S, Poulsen S, Sørensen P, Bateman A, Simonsen S. Juul S, et al. Psychother Psychosom. 2023;92(5):329-339. doi: 10.1159/000534289. Epub 2023 Nov 7. Psychother Psychosom. 2023. PMID: 37935133 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
• A randomized 3-month, parallel-group, controlled trial of CALMA m-health app as an adjunct to therapy to reduce suicidal and non-suicidal self-injurious behaviors in adolescents: study protocol. Rodante DE, Chiapella LC, Olivera Fedi R, Papávero EB, Lavoie KL, Daray FM. Rodante DE, et al. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 20;14:1087097. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1087097. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37547219 Free PMC article.
• Patient perspectives on non-response to psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: a qualitative study. Woodbridge J, Townsend ML, Reis SL, Grenyer BFS. Woodbridge J, et al. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2023 Apr 18;10(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40479-023-00219-y. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2023. PMID: 37072881 Free PMC article.
• Clinical Practice Guidelines for Assessment and Management of Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder. Sharan P, Das N, Hans G. Sharan P, et al. Indian J Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;65(2):221-237. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_495_22. Epub 2023 Jan 30. Indian J Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37063623 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
• Effectiveness of outpatient and community treatments for people with a diagnosis of 'personality disorder': systematic review and meta-analysis. Katakis P, Schlief M, Barnett P, Rains LS, Rowe S, Pilling S, Johnson S. Katakis P, et al. BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 21;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04483-0. BMC Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 36681805 Free PMC article.
• Paris J. Social Factors in Personality Disorders: A Biopsychosocial Approach to Etiology and Treatment. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
• American Psychiatric Association. Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(suppl 1):1–52. - PubMed
• Soloff PH. Psychopharmacology of borderline personality disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2000;23:169–191. - PubMed
• Zanarini MC. Update on pharmacotherapy of borderline personality disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2004;6:66–70. - PubMed
• Linehan MM, Armstrong HE, Suarez A, Allmon D, Heard HL. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of chronically parasuicidal borderline patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991;48:1060–1064. - PubMed

Publication types

• Search in MeSH

Related information

• Cited in Books

Grants and funding

• R01 MH063746/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
• MH-63746/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

• Europe PubMed Central
• Ovid Technologies, Inc.
• PubMed Central

Other Literature Sources

• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

• Subscribe to journal Subscribe
• Get new issue alerts Get alerts

Secondary Logo

Journal logo.

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.

Save my selection

Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving Program and Emotion Dysregulation

A pilot study.

Boccalon, Silvia PsyD * ; Alesiani, Roberta PsyD * ; Giarolli, Laura PsyD * ; Fossati, Andrea PhD *†

*Department of Clinical Neurosciences, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan; and †Department of Humanities, LUMSA University, Rome, Italy.

Send reprint requests to Silvia Boccalon, PsyD, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, 20 Stamira d'Ancona Street, 20127 Milan, Italy. E-mail: [email protected] .

The aim of this study was to assess the observed changes on emotion dysregulation obtained through the Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) program. The sample is composed of 24 subjects with a personality disorder with borderline features. All participants filled out the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). There was a significant decrease in the DERS total score at the end of the treatment and at 6-month follow-up. Friedman test showed a significant decrease in suicide attempts and hospitalizations over time. The analysis of the DERS subscales showed that “goals” and “impulse” were the two dimensions on which the treatment acted and the changes were stable over time. STEPPS is associated with an improvement in emotion regulation and a reduction in the number of hospitalizations and suicide attempts. The treatment seems to act on the behavioral dimensions of emotion dysregulation like the ability to control impulsive behaviors and to achieve goals.

Full Text Access for Subscribers:

Individual subscribers.

Institutional Users

Not a subscriber.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

• + Favorites
• View in Gallery