• ...is an important factor/concept/idea/ to consider because...
• … will be argued/outlined in this paper.
Once you have finished writing your first draft it is recommended that you spend time revising your work. Proofreading and editing are two different stages of the revision process.
As can be seen in the figure above there are four main areas that you should review during the editing phase of the revision process. The main things to consider when editing include content, structure, style, and sources. It is important to check that all the content relates to the assignment task, the structure is appropriate for the purposes of the assignment, the writing is academic in style, and that sources have been adequately acknowledged. Use the checklist below when editing your work.
Editing checklist
There are also several key things to look out for during the proofreading phase of the revision process. In this stage it is important to check your work for word choice, grammar and spelling, punctuation and referencing errors. It can be easy to mis-type words like ‘from’ and ‘form’ or mix up words like ‘trail’ and ‘trial’ when writing about research, apply American rather than Australian spelling, include unnecessary commas or incorrectly format your references list. The checklist below is a useful guide that you can use when proofreading your work.
Proofreading checklist
This chapter has examined the experience of writing assignments. It began by focusing on how to read and break down an assignment question, then highlighted the key components of essays. Next, it examined some techniques for paraphrasing and summarising, and how to build an argument. It concluded with a discussion on planning and structuring your assignment and giving it that essential polish with editing and proof-reading. Combining these skills and practising them, can greatly improve your success with this very common form of assessment.
Academic Skills Centre. (2013). Writing an introduction and conclusion . University of Canberra, accessed 13 August, 2013, http://www.canberra.edu.au/studyskills/writing/conclusions
Balkis, M., & Duru, E. (2016). Procrastination, self-regulation failure, academic life satisfaction, and affective well-being: underregulation or misregulation form. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31 (3), 439-459.
Custer, N. (2018). Test anxiety and academic procrastination among prelicensure nursing students. Nursing education perspectives, 39 (3), 162-163.
Yerdelen, S., McCaffrey, A., & Klassen, R. M. (2016). Longitudinal examination of procrastination and anxiety, and their relation to self-efficacy for self-regulated learning: Latent growth curve modeling. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16 (1).
Writing Assignments Copyright © 2021 by Kate Derrington; Cristy Bartlett; and Sarah Irvine is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.
Learn about the differences between a test and an assignment
*See the article here to learn how to set up a test that can be paused.
Learn more: How to set up an assignment How to set up a test.
An Assignment is similar to traditional homework. Students get a section of the course that they have to prepare until the set deadline. This includes theory and exercise pages. While doing the assignment, students can use feedback, hints, and have multiple attempts to solve an exercise.
Students can start and pause an assignment as many times as they want, until the deadline. Once the deadline is reached, the assignment is submitted and their score is graded.
This is what an assignment looks like for students:
Teachers can't grade assignments - they are automatically graded by the computer. Instead, you can set up the passing score when you set up the assignment .
You can find the results of the assignments in the Reporting environment, but only after the deadline has passed. Learn more about how assignment scores are calculated here .
A test emulates an exam, and depending on the setting can be formative or summative. Students don't have access to theory pages, and only have one answer attempt per question (unless you set up the practice mode in Test settings), so there is no feedback/hint system.
Tests can't be paused- once the student starts the test, their time starts counting down and they have to finish it and submit it.
This is what a test looks like for students:
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
Replacing exams with project-based assessment: analysis of students’ performance and experience.
2. exams vs. projects: advantages and shortcomings.
“I liked the assessment of the course. We were given assignments about certain topics that we were learning at the time, and I find that helpful in learning.” “The assignments questions were very good in making one understand the problems”.
“The labs being instantly assessed helped me learn much more than if the questions had to be answered by myself at home. It eliminated a lot of ambiguity and clarified confusing points especially around theoretical expectations for lab results and interpretation versus ‘real life’ soil behaviour. Stuff that would have taken ages to understand and days of deliberation was addressed.”
6. results and discussion, 6.1. student academic performance, 6.2. student experience with project-based learning.
“It seems like a really good decision to make it assignment-based and no final. The assignments have had me go through and be tested on every aspect of the course and I have learnt so much. Probably more than if I had to cram for a final and then forget everything the next week.”
“I feel like in many courses, especially soil mechanics, a large project rather than an exam is more beneficial, as more content can be assessed, plus the question-solving is more realistic (in real life you would have more than 2 hours to solve a problem!).”
“The project-based work enabled me to better see how the theoretical principles we have learned in class actually translate into the real world.”
“Having worked in the engineering industry prior to uni, I find the projects more relevant to what is expected on the job.”
6.4. student and teacher workloads, 7. concluding remarks.
Informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
Exam-Based Assessment Plan (2015–2017) | Project-Based Assessment Plan (2018–2022) |
---|---|
Lab work (10%) | Lab work (10%) |
Two assignments (10%) | Two online quizzes (20%) |
Mid-semester exam (25%) | Project 1 (25%) |
Final Exam (55%) | Project 2 (35%) |
Site visit or industry guest lecture reflection (10%) |
Type of Exam (2015–2017) | Project-Based Assignments (2018–2022) |
---|---|
Mid-semester exam | Project 1 |
Content: Textbook-like problems on soil classification, soil constituents, soil compaction, stresses, water seepage, and soil compaction. Duration: 2-h exam in the class Submission: Exam paper was submitted to the invigilator at the end of the exam Feedback: Solutions were uploaded; additional feedback from the teacher was provided on student demand. | Content: Students were given real data from site (borehole logs) investigation and lab tests. Students were required to draw a cross-section, discuss the geology, classify soil, estimate stresses including the effect of upward seepage and analyse the data from compaction tests. Duration: 10 days Submission: Individual report was submitted online Feedback: General feedback via email to students, short personal feedback via rubrics assessment, additional feedback from the teacher was provided on student demand. |
Final exam | Project 2 |
Content: Textbook problems on water flow, flow nets, soil deformation, consolidation, and shear strength. Duration: 3-h exam in the class Submission: Exam paper was submitted to the invigilator at the end of the exam. Feedback: Feedback was provided on student demand | Content: Students were given real data from site and lab investigations. They were required to draw a flow net and estimate the stresses, estimate the time and amount of soft soil consolidation due to embankment loads, and obtain shear strength parameters for slope stability analysis. Duration: 10 days Submission: Individual report was submitted online Feedback: Short personal feedback via rubrics assessment. More detailed feedback from the teacher was provided on student demand. |
Years | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of students | 144 | 128 | 112 | 97 | 95 | 96 | 78 | 74 |
Male/Female (%) | 85/15 | 86/14 | 89/11 | 87/13 | 92/8 | 83/17 | 87/13 | 87/13 |
Domestic/International (%) | 65/35 | 62/38 | 66/34 | 63/37 | 77/23 | 75/25 | 87/13 | 85/15 |
GPA Range | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<4 | 15.5 | 18.6 | 22.4 | 13.2 | 10.5 | 7.5 | 20.0 | 14.8 |
4 to <5 | 29.6 | 32.6 | 22.4 | 32.7 | 35.8 | 28.8 | 29.1 | 37.0 |
5 to <6 | 30.3 | 24.8 | 19.8 | 28.8 | 24.2 | 25.0 | 34.5 | 31.5 |
6 to 7 | 13.4 | 8.5 | 13.8 | 14.8 | 11.6 | 20.0 | 14.5 | 13.0 |
no GPA | 11.3 | 15.5 | 21.6 | 10.6 | 17.9 | 18.8 | 1.8 | 3.7 |
Years | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment Type | Exam-Based Assessment | Project-Based Assessment | |||||||
Mid semester exam/Project 1 mark | Average | 69.9 | 67.2 | 70.8 | 75.1 | 76.9 | 66.3 | 66.5 | 62.3 |
Standard Deviation | 17.4 | 19.3 | 19.5 | 14.0 | 10.3 | 17.2 | 16.1 | 21.8 | |
Final Exam/Project 2 mark | Average | 65.2 | 63.8 | 61.2 | 76.4 | 74.7 | 69.0 | 65.8 | 67.0 |
Standard Deviation | 15.8 | 19.5 | 15.5 | 12.0 | 12.2 | 13.1 | 15.2 | 15.3 | |
Failure rate (%) | 1.3 | 8.3 | 4.3 | 5.2 | 3.2 | 9.9 | 16.2 | 18.0 |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Gratchev, I. Replacing Exams with Project-Based Assessment: Analysis of Students’ Performance and Experience. Educ. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040408
Gratchev I. Replacing Exams with Project-Based Assessment: Analysis of Students’ Performance and Experience. Education Sciences . 2023; 13(4):408. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040408
Gratchev, Ivan. 2023. "Replacing Exams with Project-Based Assessment: Analysis of Students’ Performance and Experience" Education Sciences 13, no. 4: 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040408
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
Protests against sfu’s continued investment in israel arise at summer convocation, sfu queer collective’s webinar tackles 2slgbtqia+ rights in universities, protect our province bc holds briefing on covid-19 infections in hospitals, indigenous voices must be prioritized when fighting climate change, the bc government should pay for therapy, the genocide of palestinians is not up for debate, what grinds our gears: the job market, halfsoul chronicles the struggles of mental health, identity, and morality, la lune rocks on with songs of disparity, theatre under the stars’ cats features two sfu dance majors, indigenous songwriters illuminating ancestral languages, from turtle island to gaza, indigenous place names in so-called vancouver, the right to protest our universities’ decisions, a guide to cannabis use, wannabe influencer goes to the retirement home to tell her grandparents…, minimum wage worker doing the job of three people is excited…, remembering the 2023-24 vancouver canucks, horoscopes june 24 – 30, it’s okay to cheer: let fans be fans, the dark side of hockey, a projection of what the blue jays’ season will bring, sfu women’s basketball coach bruce langford reaches historic 500-win mark, what’s it like working at the peak, carissa toledo – sfu student artists (artist spotlight), anxiety & adhd: the peak speaks podcast, what’s going on in stanley park, y2k chronicles: tales from the digital frontier, the ultimate 2000s quiz, the battle of limewire vs. frostwire, the greatest ipod shuffles of the 2000s, xx a lonely makeup tutorial xx, students learn better through assignments, not exams.
It’s time the university does away with ridiculous and inaccessible exams
by Lubaba Mahmud, Peak Associate
The fact that I see so many posts with some variant of “course suggestions with no exams? TIA” on the Facebook group “Must Knows for SFU Courses” says something about the way SFU students want to learn. The comments, which are filled with suggestions and expressions of annoyance about exams, show that a lot of students look for alternative grading criteria. This may be because we learn a great deal through participation and assignments of various forms, but I’m not sure whether we actually learn when we’re cramming for exams . Therefore, assignments that challenge our learning at a higher level and are a much better alternative to evaluating students’ knowledge .
Assignments, like essays, are a lot better for my learning experience. Exams induce a lot of fear and often lead to cramming , a defence mechanism that isn’t great for my, or any other student’s, mental and physical health. I’ve noticed that sometimes I get so burnt-out that I’m not actively reviewing my course materials, just reading them absent-mindedly so that I can cross it off my to-do list. On the other hand, that doesn’t happen when I’m researching for an essay. I’m more focused because I have to look for the author’s main ideas and paraphrase them in my own words, or even actively apply a theory to explain something I’ve come across.
Moreover, we’re encouraged to discuss assignments with TAs and professors; I’ve done so several times and this sparked many interesting conversations beyond the classroom. In my experience, this kind of intellectual discussion does not happen in classes that are weighed more to exams. At most, the instructor simply posts the solutions and asks students to talk to them if they have questions. Students are more focused on finding the answers to the specific set of questions they’ve received for the exam and don’t explore the material further.
Assignments are especially more relevant than traditional exams in our current remote learning environment. For one, essays and creative projects often need more higher-order thinking than exams do, as the latter may be more focused on remembering materials with set solutions, while the former asks for individual interpretations. This reduces the chances of cheating, as students can’t simply copy from each other.
They are also more accessible for international students who are living in different time zones. I’ve been given disastrous exams at 4 a.m. during remote learning, leaving me to be a demotivated mess for the entire term. Instructors have told us to be “ready for unusual hours of commitment,” but they are basically asking us to suck it up even though international students pay exorbitant amounts of tuition fees and should be given time zone accommodations for timed exams. I know instructors will argue that exams are meant to test our knowledge, but when they’re at such inaccessible hours they’re only testing my ability to stay awake, rather than how well I know the subject.
These timed exams also have additional nuisances that add to those problems: technological issues like Canvas glitches and invasive proctoring software. I have experienced both of these and they resulted in professors sending an all-caps email with the subject line “STOP SENDING ME EMAILS ABOUT THE EXAM.” It’s funny when I look back on it, but not so much when I’m trying to write an exam worth 30 % of my grade while checking emails for updates, which wastes precious time. Needless to say that these stressful problems do not occur when we’re required to do an assignment and are given sufficient time for it.
Exams are old-fashioned and ridiculous in this day and age, and assignments are much better for testing our true knowledge — it’s time SFU recognizes this.
Leave a reply cancel reply, editor picks, explore the “ajeeb” in life with asian heritage month at morrow, i don’t know how to feel about kung fu panda 4, masks should be mandatory in healthcare, popular posts, independent jewish voices calls on bc government to reject ihra definition of antisemitism, exploring vancouver’s latin american culture, everyone hates the stairwell detour at commercial-broadway, popular category.
Simon Fraser University's independent student newspaper since 1965.
Contact us: [email protected]
© The Peak Publications Society 1965-2024
As of January 1st, 2020, Internet Explorer (versions 11 and below) is no longer supported by Evolve. To get the best possible experience using Evolve, we recommend that you use another web browser. For HESI iNet users click here .
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
If you are willing to think creatively about assignments that go beyond traditional exams or research papers, you may be able to design assignments that are more accurate reflections of the kind of thinking and problem-solving you want your students to engage in. In addition, non-traditional assignments can boost students' motivation.
An assignment-based evaluation or an exam-based evaluation. Research and records indicate that, over the last 40 years in the United Kingdom and other nations, the assignment-based evaluation or completion of the module assessment of higher education coursework (postgraduate, Master's & Ph.D.) has significantly enhanced. ...
The definition of performance-based assessments varies greatly depending on author, disciple, publication, and intended audience (Palm, 2008). In general, a performance-based assessment measures students' ability to apply the skills and knowledge learned from a unit or units of study. Typically, the task challenges students to use their higher ...
An assignment is a written or digitally created piece of academic work. It forces a learner to learn, practice, and demonstrate their progress and achievements in academics. An assignment-based evaluation system considers assignments written by the learners as the measure of learning, as opposed to an examination-based evaluation system.
Many argued that students today are more suited for an assignment-based curriculum as compared with the traditional British unseen exams model. In this video...
Performance-based learning and performance-based assessments are a system of learning and assessing a student's knowledge through a display of skills. In this system, student performance is not measured by a multiple-choice test or quiz. Instead, students are given assignments that mimic real-world situations. To successfully complete the ...
ps of AssessmentStep 1: Identify Learning OutcomesThese are the important knowledge, skills, modes of thinking, or values t. at you expect graduates of your program to possess. This process may entail a review of your program mission an. goals, disciplinary norms, or employment criteria. In some cases, you may surv.
Written assignments in any form (authentic, project, or problem-based) can also be designed to collect data and measure student learning, as well as provide opportunities for self-regulation and reflective learning. Instructors should consider using a type of grading rubric ... exam, written assignment, portfolio, performance, project, etc.
Instructions can prepare students for what they are about to be asked by previewing the format of the exam, including question type and point value (e.g., there will be 10 multiple-choice questions, each worth two points, and two essay questions, each worth 15 points). This helps students use their time more effectively during the exam.
Assignments and assessments are much the same thing: an instructor is unlikely to give students an assignment that does not receive some sort of assessment, whether formal or informal, formative or summative; and an assessment must be assigned, whether it is an essay, case study, or final exam. ... Essay-based Exam: An essay-based exam is an ...
Tutor-Marked Assignments (TMAs) You'll usually have a number of these throughout each module. Each one can be an essay, a series of questions, a skills test, a speaking assessment or something else that allows you to show what you've learned. They'll each have a submission deadline. When your tutor returns them, they'll provide you with ...
If grades are assigned to a quiz, test, project, or other work product, the reasoning goes, they become de facto summative assessments—i.e., the act of assigning a grade turns the assessment into a performance evaluation that is documented in a student's academic record, as opposed to a diagnostic strategy used to improve student ...
This includes discussion-based assessments. Even though some students may get nervous or anxious, just remember that DBAs are simply a verbal conversation between you and your teacher. DBAs are one of the ways we ensure academic integrity (and make sure that it's actually you doing the work). This is why teachers need to hear directly from you!
1. Use the review sheets to study efficiently. Most courses I've taken with essay-based exams have also provided a review sheet with topics and information about the exam beforehand. This means that you often don't have to review the entire course in depth to do well. If the professor gives you a list of say, 15 topics, and you know that ...
Utilizing alternative and innovative testing formats such as PBL enhances student learning as they develop skills such as higher critical thinking, problem-solving, teamwork, communication, and leadership skills. Plus, there are even long-term benefits, such as stronger initiative-taking, responsibility, character, and the ability to understand ...
In classrooms that use PBL, students often work together to answer curriculum-relevant questions and solve challenges, preparing them to become adept communicators and collaborators in their future lives and careers. Instead of end-of-unit tests, they are assessed through group or independent projects. For example, in a unit about environmental ...
Using data on students at a Canadian business school, this article studies the effect of homework assignments and in-class quizzes on exam performance. Based on a difference-in-difference approach, assignments had a statistically discernible positive impact on exam grades for the overall sample.
Assignments are a common method of assessment at university and require careful planning and good quality research. Developing critical thinking and writing skills are also necessary to demonstrate your ability to understand and apply information about your topic. It is not uncommon to be unsure about the processes of writing assignments at ...
Based on a difference-in-difference approach, assignments had a statistically discernible positive impact on exam grades for the overall sample. When broken down by gender, assignments had a ...
An Assignment is similar to traditional homework. Students get a section of the course that they have to prepare until the set deadline. This includes theory and exercise pages. While doing the assignment, students can use feedback, hints, and have multiple attempts to solve an exercise. Students can start and pause an assignment as many times ...
This study seeks to investigate whether project-based assignments can lead to better student performance and learning experience compared to traditional examinations. In an engineering course of soil mechanics, the traditional mid-semester and final exams were replaced by project work which was related to a real-life site investigation. Student performance was evaluated on the basis of student ...
Therefore, assignments that challenge our learning at a higher level and are a much better alternative to evaluating students' knowledge. Assignments, like essays, are a lot better for my learning experience. Exams induce a lot of fear and often lead to cramming, a defence mechanism that isn't great for my, or any other student's, mental ...
In such cases, traditional exams may be replaced with project-based work, which is perceived as a more engaging and industry-related. However, this prompts the question as to how effective, in comparison with traditional exams, such project-based assignments can be in assisting students in their learning journey.
Skip to main content