literature review on rice pdf

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• My Account Login
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Review Article
• Open access
• Published: 14 October 2022

Two decades of rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines: A systematic review and research agenda for the social sciences

• Ginbert P. Cuaton   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5902-3173 1 &
• Laurence L. Delina   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8637-4609 1  

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications volume  9 , Article number:  372 ( 2022 ) Cite this article

8824 Accesses

2 Citations

3 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Development studies
• Environmental studies

While rice studies are abundant, they usually focus on macro-level rice production and yield data, genetic diversity, cultivar varieties, and agrotechnological innovations. Moreover, many of these studies are either region-wide or concentrated on countries in the Global North. Collecting, synthesizing, and analyzing the different themes and topic areas in rice research since the beginning of the 21st century, especially in the Global South, remain unaddressed areas. This study contributes to filling these research lacunae by systematically reviewing 2243 rice-related articles cumulatively written by more than 6000 authors and published in over 900 scientific journals. Using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this study screened and retrieved articles published from 2001 to 2021 on the various topics and questions surrounding rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines—two rice-producing and -consuming, as well as emerging economies in Southeast Asia. Using a combination of bibliometrics and quantitative content analysis, this paper discusses the productive, relevant, and influential rice scholars; key institutions, including affiliations, countries, and funders; important articles and journals; and knowledge hotspots in these two countries. It also discusses the contributions of the social sciences, highlights key gaps, and provides a research agenda across six interdisciplinary areas for future studies. This paper mainly argues that an interdisciplinary and comparative inquiry of potentially novel topic areas and research questions could deepen and widen scholarly interests beyond conventional natural science-informed rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines. Finally, this paper serves other researchers in their review of other crops in broader global agriculture.

Similar content being viewed by others

Agricultural diversification promotes sustainable and resilient global rice production

Southeast Asia must narrow down the yield gap to continue to be a major rice bowl

Characterization of rice farming systems, production constraints and determinants of adoption of improved varieties by smallholder farmers of the Republic of Benin

Introduction.

Rice feeds the majority of the world’s population and employs millions, especially in developing countries in the Global South (Muthayya et al., 2014 ). Rice consumption has increased globally over the last decade. Statista data show that, in the cropping year 2020/2021, the world population consumed about 504.3 million metric tons of rice, increasing from 437.18 million metric tons in 2008/2009 (Shabandeh, 2021 ). These data highlight the crop’s global contribution and importance, especially in realizing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the blueprint for global prosperity (Gil et al., 2019 ). The SDGs call for systems transformation, including in agriculture, guided by the principles of sustainability and equity, driven by the leave-no-one-behind aphorism, to address the root causes of perennial poverty and chronic hunger.

Pathologist M. B. Waite ( 1915 ) pointed out that the apparent indicator of progress in modern agriculture is the application of scientific research and the subsequent modification and improvement of farming systems based on those research. For example, the Green Revolution resulted in increased agricultural production in developing countries due to the transfer of agrotechnological innovations from countries in the Global North to countries in the Global South. Although, we acknowledge that this project came with a cost (Glaeser, 2010 ; Pielke and Linnér, 2019 ; Pingali, 2012 ).

Regional rice studies have proliferated in Europe (Ferrero and Nguyen, 2004 ; Kraehmer et al., 2017 ), the Americas (Singh et al., 2017 ), Africa (Zenna et al., 2017 ), the Asia Pacific (Papademetriou et al., 2000 ), and South Asia (John and Fielding, 2014 ). Country studies on rice production have also emerged in Australia (Bajwa and Chauhan, 2017 ), China (Peng et al., 2009 ), and India (Mahajan et al., 2017 ). Scholars have also systematically reviewed rice’s phytochemical and therapeutic potentials (Sen et al., 2020 ), quality improvements (Prom-u-thai and Rerkasem, 2020 ), and its role in alleviating the effects of chronic diseases and malnutrition (Dipti et al., 2012 ).

These extant studies, however, are limited on at least three fronts. First, their foci were on rice production, yield, and operational practices and challenges at the macro level. Second, there have been zero attempts at synthesizing this corpus since the 21st century. Third, there are also no attempts at examining the various rice research areas that scholars, institutions, and countries need to focus on, especially in developing country contexts, and their nexuses with the social sciences. This paper addresses these gaps by unpacking and synthesizing multiple rice studies conducted in the emerging Southeast Asian economies of Indonesia and the Philippines from 2001 to 2021. A focus on these developing countries matters since they are home to over 35 million rice farmers (IRRI, 2013 ).

We conducted our review from the Scopus database, using a combination of bibliometric and quantitative content analyses. Section “Results and discussions” reports our results, where we discuss (1) the most relevant and influential rice scholars and their collaboration networks; (2) the most rice research productive institutions, including author affiliations, their countries, and their research funders; and (3) the most significant articles and journals in rice research. This section also identifies 11 topic areas belonging to four major themes of importance for rice research in the two countries. Section “Contributions from and research agenda for the social sciences” provides a research agenda, where we identify and discuss the contributions of our review in terms of future work. Despite the preponderance of rice research in the last two decades and more in Indonesia and the Philippines, contributions from the social sciences remain marginal. Thus, in the section “Conclusion”, we conclude that emphasis is needed on expanding and maximizing the contributions of social scientists given the many opportunities available, especially for conducting interdisciplinary and comparative rice research in these Southeast Asian countries.

Review methods and analytical approach

We used bibliometric and quantitative content analyses to systematically categorize and analyze more than two decades of academic literature on rice in Indonesia and the Philippines. Bibliometric methods, also known as bibliometrics, have grown to be influential in evaluating various research fields and topic areas. Bibliometrics mushroomed because of the increasing availability of online databases and new or improved analysis software (Dominko and Verbič, 2019 ). Bibliometrics quantitatively and statistically analyze research articles using their bibliographic data, such as authors, affiliations, funders, abstracts, titles, and keywords. These data are analyzed to identify and assess the development, maturity, research hotspots, knowledge gaps, and research trends (Aria and Cuccurullo, 2017 ). For example, bibliometrics have been used in reviewing hydrological modeling methods (Addor and Melsen, 2019 ), business and public administration (Cuccurullo et al., 2016 ), and animals’ cognition and behavior (Aria et al., 2021 ).

This review article used bibliometrix , a machine-assisted program that offers multiple options and flexibility to map the literature comprehensively (Aria and Cuccurullo, 2017 ). We run this program using R Studio version 4.1.2 (2021-11-01; “Bird Hippie”) for its source code readability, understandability, and easy-to-do computer programming (Cuaton et al., 2021 ). We used bibliometrix in three critical analytical phases: (a) importing and converting data to R format, (b) identifying our dataset’s collaboration networks and intellectual and conceptual structures, and (c) processing, presenting, and analyzing our dataset. Bibliometrix, however, is unable to produce specific data that we want to highlight in this paper; examples of these are our coding criteria on interdisciplinarity and author gender, where such information was not captured in the articles’ bibliographic data in Scopus. We addressed these issues by conducting a quantitative content analysis (QCA) of our dataset. QCA is a method to record, categorize, and analyze textual, visual, or aural materials (Coe and Scacco, 2017 ). QCA has been applied in other reviews, such as in energy research development in the social sciences (Sovacool, 2014 ), the concepts of energy justice (Jenkins et al., 2021 ), and in examining agricultural issues in Botswana (Oladele and Boago, 2011 ) and Bangladesh (Khatun et al., 2021 ).

Search strategies

We constructed our dataset from the Scopus database, which we accessed via our institution’s online library on 14 November 2021. Scopus is a scientific database established in 2004 and owned by Elsevier Ltd. (Elsevier, 2021 ). We excluded other databases, such as Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and EBSCO, suggesting one potential bias in our review (Waltman, 2016 ; Zupic and Čater, 2015 ). Our decision to exclusively use Scopus arises from two main reasons. First, the database has broader coverage than others, including the abovementioned (Falagas et al., 2008 ). Scopus includes new and emerging journals published in developing countries like Indonesia and the Philippines, our focus countries. Second, Scopus has a user-friendly interface and its search options allow researchers to flexibly explore its universe of indexed articles based on authors, institutions, titles, abstracts, keywords, and references (Donthu et al., 2021 ).

We followed the PRISMA 2020 Guideline (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) (Page et al., 2021 ) in our search for potential rice-related studies in Indonesia and the Philippines (see Fig. 1 ). We used the initial search string: “rice” AND “Indonesia*” OR “Philippine*” (asterisk or “*” was used as a wildcard search strategy) and limited the year coverage from 2001 to 2021. Our first round of searches resulted in 3846 documents (results as of 14 November 2021). We filtered these documents by including only peer-reviewed, full-text English articles on rice. We did not include any documents from the grey literature (e.g., news items, press releases, government or corporate reports), and other document types indexed in Scopus such as reviews, books, conference papers, errata, comments, editorials, and short reports.

Our initial result of 3846 documents (results as of 14 November 2021) was filtered by including only peer-reviewed, full-text English articles on rice, resulting in 2243 eligible documents.

We also excluded articles with irrelevant keywords by using the following combined queries:

This resulted in 2243 eligible documents. We downloaded these documents as raw files in BibTex format and imported them to Biblioshiny , a web interface in Bibliometrix, where they were further filtered. Our verified final dataset comprises 2243 full-text English articles cumulatively written by 6893 authors and published across 909 journals (see Table 1 ).

Structure and analytical approach

We examined the authors’ profiles based on their gender, relevance in the study, and global impact. For gender, we coded them into ‘man,’ ‘woman,’ and ‘undetermined’ because some did not put enough information that helps in gender identification. We identified their gender by counter-checking their Scopus profiles to their verified accounts in Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Publons/Web of Science, or institutional profiles. We measured the authors’ relevance and impact against their (a) productivity, (b) citations, and (c) H-indices. We acknowledge, however, that some Filipino and Indonesian scholars, whose papers may not be indexed in Scopus, could also be prolific based on different parameters, but we excluded them. We proceeded to map the collaboration networks of these authors to identify “who works with whom on what.” A collaboration network illustrates nodes (circle shape) as authors and links (connecting lines) as co-authorships (Glänzel and Schubert, 2005 ).

Institutions, countries, funders

Following Sovacool ( 2014 ), we categorized the authors’ institutions into four: (1) University and research included authors who are researchers, instructors/lecturers/professors, other academic faculty from various non-university research think tanks, institutes, and national and local research centers; (2) Government consisted country or state departments, bureaus, ministries, and other government regulatory bodies; (3) Interest groups and NGOs included intergovernmental bodies, such as the United Nations Food and Agriculture Office (FAO) and international organizations like the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) and Oxfam; and (4) Banking and finance encompassed players from the finance sector, including multilateral development banks such as the Asian Development Bank (ADB), World Bank, and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). After coding and categorizing, we analyzed the authors’ institutional collaboration networks.

We identified the country’s productivity and coded them by global region based on their geographical location: (a) Asia, (b) Australia, New Zealand, and South Pacific, (c) Europe, (d) North America, (e) South America, and (f) Africa. We did this to show how various countries have been researching rice in Indonesia and the Philippines since the 21st century.

We then constructed a country collaboration map as a visual macro-representation of countries working together on rice research using these data. Bibliometrix, however, measured the country’s productivity based on the corresponding authors’ affiliations. We, therefore, noted two critical points here. First, many corresponding authors may have multiple institutional affiliations. For example, one corresponding author may belong to more than two affiliations (e.g., a corresponding Filipino author may have concurrent institutional affiliations in Japan, Australia, and New Zealand). Second, the corresponding authors may not necessarily be nationals of that country. Note that the unit of analysis is based on the corresponding authors’ institutional affiliations at the time of publication and not on their country/ies of citizenship or nationality. Despite these, our findings still provide insight into the macro-level productivity of countries conducting rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines.

We analyzed the funders using Scopus’ in-house Analytics Tool and determined their relevance based on the number of articles mentioning them in the Funding source or Acknowledgment section in the paper. We categorized the funders into six: (1) government (e.g., ministries, departments, or regulatory agencies), (2) research (e.g., research councils, research centers, and national academies), (3) foundations and non-government organizations (NGOs), (4) universities, (5) private companies and corporations, and (6) intergovernmental organizations/IGOs, including multilateral development banks.

Articles and journals

In terms of interdisciplinarity, we coded the articles as (a) interdisciplinary, (b) disciplinary, or (c) unidentified by using the authors’ department or division affiliation/s as a proxy to determine their disciplinary training. We coded an article as interdisciplinary if it belonged to any of the three criteria: (1) it had an author that had training or belonged to a department/division in at least two conventional disciplines (e.g., agriculture, anthropology, sociology, biology); (2) it had an author that had a self-identified interdisciplinary department (e.g., interdisciplinary division, sustainability, agriculture economics, etc.); or (3) it had at least two authors with different disciplinary training or expertise (e.g., business and economics; crop science and political science, etc.). We coded an article as disciplinary if its author/s had only belonged to one conventional department/division affiliation (e.g., Division of Agriculture, Department of Economics, Division of Environmental Science, etc.). On the other hand, we coded an article as undetermined when the authors had only indicated the name of their institutions or did not indicate their departmental or division affiliations (e.g., only the University of the Philippines, IRRI, Universitas Gadja Mada, etc.).

We examined the articles based on their local relevance and global influence. Bibliometrix measured the articles’ relevance based on their “local citations” or citations received from the 2243 articles of our sample dataset. We did this to determine which papers are considered relevant by authors studying various areas of rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines. Global influence is measured based on the articles’ citations from the global research community or other scientific works beyond our sample dataset. We also conducted a co-citation analysis of the cited references. Co-citation is the frequency by which articles cite together two or more articles relevant to the topic areas of inquiry (Aria and Cuccurullo, 2017 ). Bibliometrix had identified some co-cited articles published before our timeline of interest (i.e., pre-2001) which provide scholars with a more profound understanding of rice research in the two countries.

On the other hand, Bibliometrix identified the most relevant journals based on the number of papers the journals had published and the local citations of the articles. These data guide readers and researchers on which journals to look for on rice studies in Indonesia and the Philippines.

Knowledge hotspots

Bibliometrix creates a thematic map that allows researchers to identify which study areas have been adequately explored and which areas need further investigation or re-investigation to identify knowledge hotspots and research gaps (Aria and Cuccurullo, 2017 ). Della Corte et al. ( 2019 , pp. 5–6) discussed the major themes in Bibliometrix in the following:

“Themes in the lower-right quadrant are the Basic Themes , characterized by high centrality and low density. These themes are considered essential for a research field and concerned with general topics across different research areas.

Themes in the upper-right quadrant are the Motor Themes , characterized by high centrality and density. Motor themes are considered developed and essential for the research field.

Themes in the upper-left quadrant are the highly developed and isolated themes or Niche Themes . They have well-developed internal links (high density) but unimportant external links, which could be interpreted as having limited importance for the field (low centrality).

Themes in the lower-left quadrant are known as Emerging or Declining Themes . They have low centrality and density, making them weakly developed and marginal.”

Contributions from and research agenda for the social sciences

As interdisciplinary environmental and social scientists, we also focused our review on the social studies of rice in the two countries. This section highlighted the gaps between the natural and the social sciences in rice research and advanced a research agenda for interdisciplinary and comparative social scientists.

Limitations

As in any systematic review, we acknowledge certain limitations to our work. We discuss four of these.

First, to keep a certain level of reliability, we focused only on peer-reviewed full-length research articles written in the English language and indexed in the Scopus database. Therefore, we may have excluded some relevant articles, including those written in Filipino, Indonesian, and other local or indigenous languages and published in local or international journals but are not indexed in Scopus. Our review also excluded conference papers, commentaries, book reviews, book chapters, conference reviews, data papers, errata, letters, notes, and non-academic publications like policy briefings, reports, and white papers.

Second, in our quantitative content analysis, we acknowledge the highly cis-heteronormative approach we used in coding the author’s gender as “man” or “woman.” We identified these genders from the names and pictures of the authors in their verified Scopus, Publons/ Web of Science, and institutional profiles. It is not our deliberate intention to neglect the varying genders of researchers and scientists beyond the traditional binary of man or woman.

Third, we recognize that our analysis cannot directly identify how much each funder provided as the unit of analysis in bibliometrix may depend on how prolific researchers were in publishing articles despite smaller funds. For instance, one research project supported by Funder A with US$1 million may have published only one article based on their project design or the funder's requirement. Since the authors published only one paper from this project, the data could show that Funder A only funded one research. Another research project, supported by Funder B, with only US$300,000 in funding, may have published more than five papers; therefore, more articles counted as funded by Funder B. This issue is not within the scope of our review.

Lastly, it should be noted that the future research works we discussed were highly influenced by our research interests and the general overview of the literature, and thus neither intend to cover nor aim to discuss the entire research topics that other scholars could study.

Despite these limitations, we strongly argue that our review provided relevant insights and proposed potentially novel topic areas and research questions for other scholars to explore, especially social scientists, in deepening and widening rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines. To end, we hope that researchers heed our call to conduct more interdisciplinary and comparative rice-related studies in these two emerging Southeast Asian countries.

Results and discussions

Our dataset comprises 2243 peer-reviewed journal articles cumulatively written by 6893 authors who cited around 80,000 cumulative references. The average annual publications from 2001 to 2013 were only 57 papers but elevated to hundreds beginning in 2014 (Fig. 2 ).

The average number of annual publications on rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines from 2001 to 2013 was only 57 papers but elevated to hundreds beginning in 2014.

Of the 159 authors, one had a duplicate profile; thus, we identified 158 authors publishing on rice studies; the majority (66%) are men. The top 50 most prolific scholars produced a little over 25% (567 articles) of the total articles. Australian ecologist Finbarr Horgan topped this list ( n  = 21), followed by Bas Bouman and Grant Singleton—each with 20 articles. The top 10 authors with the highest number of publications have affiliations with the IRRI, the University of the Philippines, the University of Gadjah Mada, and the Philippine Rice Research Institute (PhilRice). For the full list of prolific scholars with at least 10 articles published, see Supplementary Table 1 .

In terms of the authors with the most local citations, although Finbarr Horgan has the most documents, Johan Iskandar ( n  = 36 citations) from the Universitas Padjadjaran, who studies rice genetic diversity, is the most cited. Local citations refer to the citations received by authors from our sample dataset of 2243 articles. Muhidin Muhidin from the Universitas Halu Oleo and Ruhyat Partasasmita from the Universitas Padjadjaran, followed him with 30 and 28 local citations, respectively. Common to these three authors are their Biology background/expertise and interest in rice genetic diversity. To check the top 20 most locally cited scholars, refer to Supplementary Table 2 .

The H-index is the author-level measure of publications’ productivity and citation impacts (Hirsch, 2005 ). Bas Bouman (H-index = 18) leads the top 10 scholars among rice-related researchers in Indonesia and the Philippines. Yoshimichi Fukuta (H index = 13) and Shaobing Peng (H index = 13) followed him. These three authors are affiliated with or have collaborated with the IRRI. To check the top 10 scholars with the highest H-indices, refer to Supplementary Table 3 .

Figure 3 reveals the top 80 authors who collaborate across eight major clusters of rice research. The Red cluster shows Finbarr Horgan as the most prominent author with at least four significant collaborators in pest management, specifically on rice stemborers (Horgan et al., 2021 ), anthropods’ biodiversity in tropical rice ecosystems (Horgan et al., 2019 ), and virulence adaptations of rice leafhoppers (Horgan et al., 2018 ). In the Purple Cluster, Yoshimichi Fukuta has multiple publications with at least six collaborators in the study of rice blast (Ebitani et al., 2011 ; Kadeawi et al., 2021 ; Mizobuchi et al., 2014 ). In the Brown cluster, Bernard Canapi from the IRRI has collaborated with at least five scholars in the study of rice insect pest management (Cabasan et al., 2019 ; Halwart et al., 2014 ; Litsinger et al., 2011 ), farmers’ preference for rice traits (Laborte et al., 2015 ), and the drivers and consequences of genetic erosion in traditional rice agroecosystems in the Philippines (Zapico et al., 2020 ). The Gray cluster shows that Siti Herlinda has collaborated with at least four scholars to study anthropods in freshwater swamp rice fields (Hanif et al., 2020 ; Herlinda et al., 2020 ) and the benefits of biochar on rice growth and yield (Lakitan et al., 2018 ).

The authors’ collaboration networks show eight major clusters of rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines.

Institutions

Author affiliations.

In terms of institutional types, Fig. 4 shows that most rice researchers in Indonesia and the Philippines have affiliations with “University and research.” Figure 5 shows the top 20 institutions in terms of research productivity led by the IRRI, the University of the Philippines System, the PhilRice, the Institute Pertanian Bogor/IPB University, and the University of Gadja Mada. These 20 institutions produced 66% of the articles in our dataset.

The majority of rice researchers in Indonesia and the Philippines have affiliations with “University and research”.

The top 5 most productive institutions in terms of rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines are the IRRI, the University of the Philippines System, the PhilRice, the Institute Pertanian Bogor/IPB University, and the University of Gadja Mada.

Scholars affiliated with the IRRI have written the most papers (at least 19% or 358 articles) in our dataset. The range of topics covers both regional and country studies. Some regional examples include the drivers of consumer demand for packaged rice and rice fragrance in South and Southeast Asia (Bairagi et al., 2020 ; Bairagi, Gustafson et al., 2021 ). Country studies, for example, include an investigation of rice farming in Central Java, Indonesia (Connor et al., 2021 ), the cultural significance of heirloom rice in Ifugao in the Philippines (Bairagi, Custodio et al., 2021 ), and the distributional impacts of the 2019 Philippine rice tariffication policy (Balié and Valera, 2020 ).

The University of the Philippines System, with rice scholars affiliated with their campuses in Los Baños, Diliman, Mindanao, and Manila, produced the next largest number of papers (more than 200 or 10%) on topics about rice pests and parasites (Horgan et al., 2019 , 2021 ; Vu et al., 2018 ), weed control (Awan et al., 2014 , 2015 ; Fabro and Varca, 2012 ), and climate change impacts on rice farming (Alejo and Ella, 2019 ; Ducusin et al., 2019 ; Gata et al., 2020 ). Social studies of rice conducted by the University of the Philippines researchers include indigenous knowledge on climate risk management (Ruzol et al., 2020 , 2021 ), management options in extreme weather events (Lopez and Mendoza, 2004 ), agroecosystem change (Aguilar et al., 2021 ; Neyra-Cabatac et al., 2012 ), and the development and change over time of rice production landscapes (Santiago and Buot, 2018 ; Tekken et al., 2017 ).

PhilRice, a government-owned corporation under the Department of Agriculture (Official Gazette of the Philippines, 2021 ), is the third most prolific rice research-producing institution (122 papers) on topics ranging from nematodes or rice worms (Gergon et al., 2001 , 2002 ) and arthropods (invertebrates found in rice paddies) (Dominik et al., 2018 ), hybrid rice (Perez et al., 2008 ; Xu et al., 2002 ), alternate wetting-and-drying technology (Lampayan et al., 2015 ; Palis et al., 2017 ), and community development strategies on rice productions (Romanillos et al., 2016 ).

The IPB University, a public agrarian university in Bogor, Indonesia, investigates rice productivity and sustainability (Arif et al., 2012 ; Mucharam et al., 2020 ; Setiawan et al., 2013 ), irrigation (Nugroho et al., 2018 ; Panuju et al., 2013 ), extreme weather events such as drought (Dulbari et al., 2021 ), floods (Wakabayashi et al., 2021 ), and emerging social issues such as food security (Putra et al., 2020 ), land-use change (Chrisendo et al., 2020 ; Munajati et al., 2021 ), and sustainability (Mizuno et al., 2013 ). This university has 23 research centers, including those which focus on environmental research; agricultural and village development; engineering applications in tropical agriculture; Southeast Asian food and agriculture; and agrarian studies.

Universitas Gadja Maja in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, hosts 21 research centers, including its Agrotechnology Innovation Centre. It carries out research incubation and development activities, product commercialization, and integration of agriculture, animal husbandry, energy, and natural resources into a sustainable Science Techno Park. Some of their published studies focused on drought-tolerant rice cultivars (Salsinha et al., 2020 , 2021 ; Trijatmiko et al., 2014 ), farmers’ technical efficiency (Mulyani et al., 2020 ; Widyantari et al., 2018 , 2019 ), systems of rice intensification (Arif et al., 2015 ; Syahrawati et al., 2018 ), and climate change adaptation (Ansari et al., 2021 ).

In terms of institutional collaboration, the IRRI tops the list with at least eleven collaborators (Fig. 6 ), including the Japan International Center for Agricultural Sciences, the PhilRice, the University of the Philippines System, and the Indonesian Center for Rice Research.

The IRRI, as an international organization focused on many aspects of rice, is not surprising to have the greatest number of institutional collaborators ( n  = 11 institutions).

Rice studies’ authors are from at least 79 countries; the majority of them are working in Asia (79%), followed by Europe (13%) and North America (9%). At least 90% of rice scholars are in Indonesia, and more than 51% have affiliations in the Philippines, followed by Japan, the USA, and China. For the list of the top 20 most productive countries researching rice in Indonesia and the Philippines, see Supplementary Table 4 . Figure 7 shows a macro-level picture of how countries have collaborated on rice-related projects in Indonesia and the Philippines since 2001, suggesting that rice research in both countries has benefited from international partnerships.

A macro-level picture of how countries have collaborated on rice-related projects in Indonesia and the Philippines since 2001. It suggests that rice research in both countries has benefited from international partnerships.

Only around 47% (1050 studies) of our dataset acknowledged their funding sources, where most received financial support either from governments (45%), research (27%), or university funders (16%) (Fig. 8 ). To see the top 15 funders that supported at least 10 rice-related research projects in Indonesia and the Philippines from 2001 to 2021, refer to Supplementary Table 5 . Of over 150 rice research funders, Indonesia’s Ministry of Education, Culture, and Research (formerly the Ministry of Research and Technology) funded ~6% (62 out of 1050 studies). The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology came in as the second and third largest funders, respectively.

The majority of rice research projects in Indonesia and the Philippines were funded by governments (45%), research (27%), and university institutions (16%).

Half of all articles in the dataset were borne out of interdisciplinary collaboration. More than a quarter of the articles, however, were unidentified, showing an apparent undercount of the total number of disciplinary collaborations. Most of these collaborative pieces of work (~61%) belong to the natural science subject areas of agricultural and biological sciences; biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology; and environmental science (see Table 2 ). Note that the cumulative number of articles in Table 2 is more than the total number of the sample dataset since an article may belong to multiple subject areas as indicated by its authors in Scopus. Less than 9% (354) of all papers were written by social scientists, highlighting their marginal contribution to rice research. The social studies of rice can increase our understanding of the many facets of rice production, including their socio-political, economic, and cultural aspects.

Our review shows that there are 10 major networks of rice research co-citations (Fig. 9 ). The papers by Bouman et al. ( 2005 ), Bouman et al. ( 2007 ), Bouman and Tuong ( 2001 ), and Tuong and Bouman ( 2003 ) were co-cited by scholars studying the relationship between water scarcity management vis-à-vis rice growth and yield (the purple cluster in Fig. 9 ). Papers by Yoshida et al. ( 2009 ), De Datta ( 1981 ), and Peng et al. ( 1999 ) were co-cited by scholars researching the genetic diversity, yield, and principles and practices of rice production in Indonesia (the red cluster in Fig. 9 ). Papers by Ou ( 1985 ), Mackill and Bonman ( 1992 ), Sambrook et al. ( 1989 ), Kauffman et al. ( 1973 ), Iyer and McCouch ( 2004 ), and Mew ( 1987 ) were considered essential references in studying rice diseases (blue cluster in Fig. 9 ). The top-cited article on rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines, based on their overall global citations, is a study on water-efficient and water-saving irrigation (Belder et al., 2004 ). This study detailed alternative options for typical water management in lowland rice cultivation, where fields are continuously submerged, hence requiring a continuous large amount of water supply (Belder et al., 2004 ). Global citations refer to the citations received by the articles within and beyond our sample dataset of 2243 articles. To see the top 10 most globally cited articles on rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines, refer to Supplementary Table 6 .

There are 10 major networks of rice research co-citations in Indonesia and the Philippines.

The journal Biodiversitas: Journal of Biological Diversity published the most number of papers on rice research in the two countries. Biodiversitas publishes papers “dealing with all biodiversity aspects of plants, animals, and microbes at the level of gene, species, ecosystem, and ethnobiology” (Biodiversitas, 2021 ). Following its indexing in Scopus in 2014, Biodiversitas has increasingly published rice studies, most of which were authored by Indonesian researchers. To see the top 10 most relevant journals for rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines based on the number of documents published since 2001, refer to Supplementary Table 7 .

Based on their local citations, the journals Field Crops Research , Theoretical & Applied Genetics , and Science are the most relevant. Field Crops Research focuses on crop ecology, crop physiology, and agronomy of field crops for food, fiber, feed, medicine, and biofuel. Theoretical and Applied Genetics publishes original research and review articles in all critical areas of modern plant genetics, plant genomics, and plant biotechnology. Science is the peer-reviewed academic journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and one of the world’s top academic journals. To see the top 30 most relevant journals for rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines based on the number of local citations, refer to Supplementary Table 8 .

The most used keywords found in 2243 rice research papers published between 2001 and 2021 in Indonesia and the Philippines are food security, climate change, drought, agriculture, irrigation, genetic diversity, sustainability, technical efficiency, and production (Fig. 10 ). We found 11 clusters across four significant themes of rice research in these countries (Fig. 11 ).

The most used keywords found in 2243 rice research papers published between 2001 and 2021 in Indonesia and the Philippines are food security, climate change, drought, agriculture, irrigation, genetic diversity, sustainability, technical efficiency, and production.

There are four major themes composed of 11 clusters of rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines since 2001.

Basic themes

We identified four major clusters under ‘basic themes’ (refer to Fig. 11 ):

The Red Cluster on studies in the Philippines related to rice yield and productivity, drought, nitrogen, the Green Revolution, and the use and potential of biomass;

The Blue Cluster on studies in Indonesia related to food security, climate change, agriculture, upland rice, irrigation, technical efficiency, and sustainability vis-à-vis rice production;

The Green Cluster on rice genetic diversity, bacterial blight diseases, resistant rice genes, aerobic rice, and brown planthoppers; and

The Gray Cluster on the nutritional aspects of rice, including studies on biofortified rice cultivars.

Agriculture suffers from climate change impacts and weather extremes. Rice researchers in Indonesia and the Philippines are identifying drought-tolerant rice cultivars that can produce high yields in abiotic stress-prone environments (Afa et al., 2018 ; Niones et al., 2021 ). These hybrid cultivars are vital for increasing rice productivity, meeting production demand, and feeding the growing Filipino and Indonesian populations (Kumar et al., 2021 ; Lapuz et al., 2019 ). Researchers have also looked at alternative nutrient and water management strategies that farmers can use, especially those in rainfed lowland areas during drought (Banayo, Bueno et al., 2018 ; Banayo, Haefele et al., 2018 ). There were also studies on the socio-cultural dynamics under which farmers adapt to droughts, such as how past experiences of hazards influence farmers’ perceptions of and actions toward drought (Manalo et al., 2020 ).

Motor themes

We identified three significant clusters of ‘motor themes’ (refer to Fig. 11 ):

The Pink Cluster on yield loss and integrated pest management of rice fields;

The Blue-Green Cluster on biodiversity, ecosystem services, remote sensing, and water productivity; and

The Orange Cluster on the antioxidant properties of rice bran and black rice.

In both countries, pests, including weeds (Awan et al., 2014 , 2015 ), insects (Horgan et al., 2018 , 2021 ), and rodents (Singleton, 2011 ; Singleton et al., 2005 , 2010 ), have significant impacts on yield loss in rice production and human health. To address these, many farmers have embraced chemical-heavy pest management practices to prevent yield loss and increase economic benefits. Pesticides began their use in Indonesia and the Philippines and rapidly expanded from the 1970s to the 1980s (Resosudarmo, 2012 ; Templeton and Jamora, 2010 ). However, indiscriminate use of pesticides caused an ecological imbalance that exacerbated pest problems (Templeton and Jamora, 2010 ) and contributed to farmers’ acute and chronic health risks (Antle and Pingali, 1994 ; Pingali and Roger, 1995 ).

Integrated pest management was introduced, applied, and studied in both countries to address these issues. This approach combines multiple compatible pest control strategies to protect crops, reduce pesticide use, and decrease farming costs (Gott and Coyle, 2019 ). For example, Indonesia’s 1989 National Integrated Pest Management Program trained hundreds of thousands of farmers and agricultural officials about its principles, techniques, and strategies (Resosudarmo, 2012 ). In the Philippines, the government of then-President Fidel V. Ramos (1992–1996) prohibited using hazardous pesticides and instituted a “multi-pronged approach to the judicious use of pesticides” (Templeton and Jamora, 2010 , p. 1). President Ramos’ suite of policies included deploying Integrated Pest Management “as a national program to encourage a more ecologically sound approach to pest control” (Templeton and Jamora, 2010 , p. 1). This pesticide policy package benefited the Philippine government in terms of private health costs avoided (Templeton and Jamora, 2010 ).

To address weed problems, farmers traditionally use manual weeding, a labor-intensive practice. However, as labor costs for manual weeding increased, herbicide use became economically attractive to farmers (Beltran et al., 2012 ). Herbicide experiments were made to address common rice weeds including barnyard grass ( Echinochloa crus-galli ) (Juliano et al., 2010 ), crowfoot grass ( Dactyloctenium aegyptium ) (Chauhan, 2011 ), three-lobe morning glory ( Ipomoea triloba ) (Chauhan and Abugho, 2012 ), and jungle rice ( Echinochloa colona ) (Chauhan and Johnson, 2009 ). Knowledge gained from these experiments contributed to the development of integrated weed management strategies.

Yet, many factors come into play when farmers decide to use herbicides. Beltran et al. ( 2013 ) reported that farmers’ age, household size, and irrigation use are significant determinants of adopting herbicides as an alternative to manual weeding. Beltran et al. ( 2013 ) further showed that economic variables, like the price of the herbicide, household income, and access to credit, determined farmers’ level of herbicide use (Beltran et al., 2013 ). Their study highlights the complex decision-making process and competing factors affecting weed management in the Philippines.

Apart from weeds, insects, like brown planthoppers ( Nilaparvata lugens ) and green leafhoppers ( Cicadella viridis ) and their accompanying diseases, affect rice production. In Java, Indonesia, Triwidodo ( 2020 ) reported a significant influence between the insecticide use scheme and the brown planthopper ( Nilaparvata lugens ) attack rates in rice fields. Brown planthopper attacks increased depending on the frequency of pesticide application, their varieties, and volume (Triwidodo, 2020 ). In the Philippines, Kim and colleagues ( 2019 ) developed a rice tungro epidemiological model for a seasonal disaster risk management approach to insect infestation.

Some social studies of integrated pest management included those that looked at the cultural practices that mitigate insect pest losses (Litsinger et al., 2011 ) and farmers’ knowledge, attitudes, and methods to manage rodent populations (Stuart et al., 2011 ). Other social scientists evaluated the value of amphibians as pest controls, bio-monitors for pest-related health outcomes, and local food and income sources (Propper et al., 2020 ).

Niche themes

We identified two ‘niche themes’ consisting of studies related to (a) temperature change and (b) organic rice production (refer to Fig. 11 ). Temperature change significantly affects rice farming. In the Philippines, Stuecker et al. ( 2018 ) found that El Niño-induced soil moisture variations negatively affected rice production from 1987–2016. According to one experiment, high night temperature stress also affect rice yield and metabolic profiles (Schaarschmidt et al., 2020 ). In Indonesia, a study suggests that introducing additional elements, such as Azolla, fish, and ducks, into the rice farming system may enhance rice farmers’ capacity to adapt to climate change (Khumairoh et al., 2018 ). Another study produced a rainfall model for Malang Regency using Spatial Vector Autoregression. This model is essential as rainfall pattern largely determines the cropping pattern of rice and other crops in Indonesia (Sumarminingsih, 2021 ).

Studies on organic rice farming in the Philippines include resource-poor farmers’ transition from technological to ecological rice farming (Carpenter, 2003 ) and the benefits of organic agriculture in rice agroecosystems (Mendoza, 2004 ). Other studies on organic rice focused on its impacts on agricultural development (Broad and Cavanagh, 2012 ) and climate resilience (Heckelman et al., 2018 ). In Indonesia, Martawijaya and Montgomery ( 2004 ) found that the local demand for organic rice produced in East Java was insufficient to generate revenue enough to cover its production costs. In West Java, Komatsuzaki and Syuaib ( 2010 ) found that organic rice farming fields have higher soil carbon storage capacity than fields where rice is grown conventionally. In Bali, farmers found it challenging to adopt organic rice farming vis-à-vis the complex and often contradictory and contested administration of the Subaks (MacRae and Arthawiguna, 2011 ) and the challenges they have to confront in marketing their produce (Macrae, 2011 ).

Emerging or declining themes

We identified two clusters of ‘emerging/declining themes’ or areas of rice research that are weakly developed and marginal (refer to Fig. 11 ). The Purple Cluster (emerging) studies rice straw, rice husk, methane, and rice cultivation, while the Light Blue Cluster (declining) pertains to local rice research.

In this section, we present and discuss the contributions of the social sciences, highlight key gaps, and provide a research agenda across six interdisciplinary areas for future studies. In Table 3 , we summarized the various topic areas that other scholars could focus on in their future studies of rice in Indonesia and the Philippines.

Economic, political, and policy studies

Political scientist Ernest A. Engelbert ( 1953 ) was one of the earliest scholars to summarize the importance of studying agricultural economics, politics, and policies. Engelbert ( 1953 ) identified three primary reasons scholars and laypeople alike need to understand the nature of political processes in agriculture. First, the rapid change and highly contested political environment where agriculture operates often places agriculture last on national policy agenda. Second, the formulation of agricultural policies intersects with contemporary national and economic contexts by which these policies revolve. Third, understanding the political processes around agriculture can help avoid political pressures and machinations aimed at undermining agricultural development.

Politics play a crucial role in better understanding rice- and agriculture-related policies, their evolution, dynamics, challenges, developments, and futures. Grant ( 2012 , p. 271) aptly asks, “Who benefits [from government policies, regulations, and programs]?” . Knowing, understanding, and answering this question is crucial since policymaking is a highly contested process influenced and negotiated not only by farmers and decision-makers but also by other interest groups, such as people’s organizations and non-government organizations. On the other hand, understanding macro- and micro-economic government arrangements come hand-in-hand in analyzing how policies impact farmers and consumers. Using tariffs as an example, Laiprakobsup ( 2014 , p. 381) noted the effects of government interventions in the agrarian market:

“… when the government implements consumer subsidy programs by requiring the farmers to sell their commodities at a cheaper price, it transfers the farmers’ incomes that they were supposed to earn to the consumers. Moreover, the government transfers tax burdens to the farmers via export taxes in that the agricultural industry is likely to purchase the farmers’ commodities as cheaply as possible in order to make up for its cost.”

The two countries have compelling economic, political, and policy-oriented rice studies. Some examples of this type of research in the Philippines are the following. Intal and Garcia ( 2005 ) argued that the price of rice had been a significant determinant in election results since the 1950s. Fang ( 2016 ) analyzed how the Philippines’ colonial history bolstered an oligarchy system, where landed elite politicians and patronage politics perpetuated corruption to the detriment of rice farmers. Balié and Valera ( 2020 ) examined rice trade policy reforms’ domestic and international impacts. San Juan ( 2021 ) contends that the 2019 Rice Tariffication Law of the Philippines only encouraged the country to rely on imports and failed to make the local rice industry more competitive.

In Indonesia, some political studies on rice production are the following. Putra et al. ( 2020 ) analyzed how urbanization affected food consumption, food composition, and farming performance. Noviar et al. ( 2020 ) provided evidence that households in the rice sub-sector have achieved an insufficient level of commercialization in their rice production. Rustiadi et al. ( 2021 ) investigated the impacts of land incursions over traditionally rice farming regions due to Jakarta’s continuous expansion. Satriawan and Shrestha ( 2018 ) evaluated how Indonesian households participated in the Raskin program, a nationwide rice price subsidy scheme for the poor. Misdawita et al. ( 2019 ) formulated a social accounting matrix and used a microsimulation approach to assess the impacts of food prices on the Indonesian economy.

Future work

Social science researchers could further explore and compare the local, regional, and national similarities and differences of the abovementioned issues or conduct novel research related to land-use change, land management, urbanization, food and agricultural policies, trade policies, irrigation governance, and price dynamics. Comparative social studies of rice could also lead to meaningful results. As social policy scholar Linda Hantrais noted:

“Comparisons can lead to fresh, exciting insights and a deeper understanding of issues that are of central concern in different countries. They can lead to the identification of gaps in knowledge and may point to possible directions that could be followed and about which the researcher may not previously have been aware. They may also help to sharpen the focus of analysis of the subject under study by suggesting new perspectives.” (Hantrais, 1995 , p. n/a).

Sociological, anthropological, and cultural studies

Biologists dominated agricultural research until the mid-1960s (Doorman, 1991 ). Agriculture, in other words, was no social scientist’s business. However, this situation gradually changed when governments and scholars realized the long-term impacts of the Green Revolution from the 1950s to the 1980s, which underscores that the development, transfer, and adoption of new agrotechnology, especially in developing countries, is driven not only by techno-biological factors but also by the socio-economic, political, and cultural realities under which the farmers operate. Since then, sociologists, anthropologists, and cultural scholars have become indispensable in answering the “how”, “what”, and “why” agrarian communities follow, adopt, utilize, or, in some cases, prefer local/traditional production technologies over the technological and scientific innovations developed by engineers, biologists, geneticists, and agriculturists. Nyle C. Brady, a soil scientist and the former Director-General of the IRRI pointed out:

“… we increasingly recognize that factors relating directly to the farmer, his family, and his community must be considered if the full effects of agricultural research are to be realized. This recognition has come partly from the participation of anthropologists and other social scientists in interdisciplinary teams … during the past few years.” (IRRI, 1982 ).

Since the late 19th century, many rice studies have tried to answer the roles of social scientists in agricultural research. Social sciences have contributed to agricultural research in many ways, especially regarding technology adoption by farmers (DeWalt, 1985 ; Doorman, 1990 ). Doorman ( 1991 , p. 4) synthesized these studies and offered seven roles for sociologists and anthropologists in agricultural research as follows:

“Accommodator of new technology, ex-post and ex-ante evaluator of the impact of new technology, an indicator of the needs for new technology, translator of farmer’s perceptions, broker-sensitizer, adviser in on-farm research, and trainer of team members from other disciplines.”

Social studies of rice are especially critical in Indonesia and the Philippines—home to hundreds of Indigenous cultural communities and Indigenous peoples (Asian Development Bank, 2002 ; UNDP Philippines, 2010 ). Regardless of the highly contested debates surrounding “indigeneity” or “being indigenous,” especially in Indonesia (Hadiprayitno, 2017 ), we argue that Indigenous cultural communities and Indigenous peoples have similarities (i.e., they are often farming or agrarian societies) but also recognize their differences and diversity in terms of their farming practices, beliefs, traditions, and rituals. These socio-cultural factors and human and non-human interactions influence rice production; thus, these differences and diversity bring front-and-center the importance of needs-based, community-driven, and context-sensitive interventions or projects for rice farming communities. These are research areas best explored by sociologists, anthropologists, and cultural scholars.

Today, agriculture’s sociological, anthropological, and cultural research have gone beyond the classic technology adoption arena. In Indonesia, studies have explored farmers’ technical efficiency in rice production (e.g., Muhardi and Effendy, 2021 ), the similarities and differences of labor regimes among them (e.g., White and Wijaya, 2021 ), the role of social capital (e.g., Salman et al., 2021 ), and the reciprocal human–environmental interactions in the rice ecological system (e.g., Sanjatmiko, 2021 ). Disyacitta Nariswari and Lauder ( 2021 ) conducted a dialectological study to examine the various Sundanese, Javanese, and Betawi Malay words used in rice production. Rochman et al. ( 2021 ) looked into the ngahuma (planting rice in the fields) as one of the inviolable customary laws of the Baduy Indigenous cultural community in Banten, Indonesia.

In the Philippines, Balogbog and Gomez ( 2020 ) identified upland rice farmers’ productivity and technical efficiency in Sarangani. Aguilar et al. ( 2021 ) examined the drivers of change, resilience, and potential trajectories of traditional rice-based agroecosystems in Kiangan, Ifugao. Pasiona et al. ( 2021 ) found that using the “modified listening group method” enables farmers’ peer-to-peer learning of technical concepts. Sociologist Shunnan Chiang ( 2020 ) examined the driving forces behind the transformation of the status of brown rice in the country.

Social scientists could further look into the social, cultural, technological, and human–ecological interactions in the temporal and spatial studies of different rice farming regions in Indonesia and the Philippines. Other topics could include the cultural practices and the techno-social relationships of rice farmers (e.g., Shepherd and McWilliam, 2011 ) and other players in the rice value chain, local and indigenous knowledge and practices on agrobiodiversity conservation, historical and invasive pests and diseases, agricultural health and safety, farmer education, and aging agricultural infrastructures. Lastly, future researchers can explore the impacts of adopting rice farming technologies in the different stages or processes of the rice value chain. They can look into its short- and longer-term effects on farmers’ livelihoods and conduct comparative analyses on how it improves, or not, their livelihoods, and whether farmers regard them better compared to the traditional and indigenous practices and beliefs that their communities apply and observe in rice farming.

Social and environmental psychology

Our review yielded no article published on the social and environmental psychology aspects of rice farming in Indonesia and the Philippines, suggesting a new research frontier. The increasing demand for and competition over agricultural and natural resources due to climate change and population expansion (Foley et al., 2011 ) opens up new and emerging sociopsychological dilemmas for society to understand, answer, and, hopefully, solve. Social and environmental psychologists can help shed light on these questions, such as those related to understanding farmers’ pro-environmental agricultural practices (Price and Leviston, 2014 ), sustainable sharing and management of agricultural and natural resources (Anderies et al., 2013 ; Biel and Gärling, 1995 ), and understanding the psychosocial consequences of resource scarcity (Griskevicius et al., 2013 ). Broadly, social psychology examines human feelings, thoughts, and behaviors and how they are influenced by the actual, imagined, and implied presence, such as the effects of internalized social norms (Allport, 1985 ). Social psychologists look at the many facets of personality and social interactions and explore the impacts of interpersonal and group relationships on human behavior (American Psychological Association, 2014b ). On the other hand, environmental psychology examines psychological processes in human encounters with their natural and built environments (Stern, 2000 ). Environmental psychologists are interested in studying and understanding people’s responses to natural and technological hazards, conservation, and perceptions of the environment (American Psychological Association, 2014a ).

Using the Asian Journal of Social Psychology and the Journal of Environmental Psychology as benchmarks, we recommend that scholars explore the following uncharted or least studied areas of rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines: sociopsychological processes such as attitude and behavior, social cognition, self and identity, individual differences, emotions, human–environmental health and well-being, social influence, communication, interpersonal behavior, intergroup relations, group processes, and cultural processes. Researchers could also investigate the psycho-behavioral areas of nature–people interactions, theories of place, place attachment, and place identity, especially in rice farming. Other topics may include farmers’ perceptions, behaviors, and management of environmental risks and hazards; theories of pro-environmental behaviors; psychology of sustainable agriculture; and the psychological aspects of resource/land management and land-use change.

Climate change, weather extremes, and disaster risk reduction

Indonesia’s and Philippines’ equatorial and archipelagic location in the Pacific Ring of Fire (Bankoff, 2016 ; Parwanto and Oyama, 2014 ), coupled with their political, social, and economic complexities (Bankoff, 2003 , 2007 ; UNDRR and CRED, 2020 ), expose and render these countries highly vulnerable to hazards, such as typhoons, strong winds, tsunamis, storm surges, floods, droughts, and earthquakes. The accelerating global climate change increases the frequency and intensity of some of these hazards, such as prolonged droughts, torrential rainfalls causing floods, and super typhoons (IPCC, 2014 ). For example, torrential flooding, induced by heavy rains caused by low pressures and southwest monsoons, has been damaging lives and livelihoods, including rice production (Statista, 2021 ). The 2020 droughts caused over 12 trillion pesos (~US$239.40 billion) of economic losses in the Philippines (Statista, 2021 ) and affected millions of Indonesians (UNDRR, 2020 ). Prolonged drought in Indonesia has also exacerbated fire hazards, which caused transboundary haze pollution in neighboring countries, like Singapore and the Philippines, inflecting environmental health damages (Aiken, 2004 ; Sheldon and Sankaran, 2017 ; Tan-Soo and Pattanayak, 2019 ). Increasing sea-level rise due to anthropogenic climate change puts cities like Jakarta and Manila at risk of sinking in the next 30–50 years (Kulp and Strauss, 2019 ). The high vulnerability, frequent exposure, and low capacities of marginalized and poor Indonesians and Filipinos turn these hazards into disasters (Gaillard, 2010 ; Kelman, 2020 ; Kelman et al., 2015 ), negatively affecting rice agriculture.

Given these contexts, climate change, weather extremes, and disaster risks, vis-à-vis its impacts on the rice sector, are issues of profound interest to scholars and the Indonesian and Philippine governments. In the Philippines, climate adaptation studies include re-engineering rice drying systems for climate change (Orge et al., 2020 ) and evaluating climate-smart farming practices and the effectiveness of Climate-Resiliency Field Schools in Mindanao (Chandra et al., 2017 ). In Indonesia, where some rice farming communities are vulnerable to sea-level rise, scholars are experimenting to identify rice cultivars with high yields under different salinity levels (Sembiring et al., 2020 ). Hohl et al. ( 2021 ) used a regional climate model to develop index-based drought insurance products to help the Central Java government make drought-related insurance payments to rice farmers. Aprizal et al. ( 2021 ) utilized land-use conditions and rain variability data to develop a flood inundation area model for the Way Sekampung sub-watershed in Lampung, Sumatra. Others also looked at the science behind liquefaction hazards caused by irrigation systems for wet rice cultivation in mountainous farming communities like the 2018 earthquake-triggered landslides in Palu Valley, Sulawesi (Bradley et al., 2019 ).

Examples of climate mitigation-related studies in the Philippines include investigating the social innovation strategies in engaging rice farmers in bioenergy development (Minas et al., 2020 ) and evaluating the environmental performance and energy efficiency of rice straw-generated electricity sources (Reaño et al., 2021 ). Doliente and Samsatli ( 2021 ) argue that it is possible to combine energy and food production to increase farm productivity and reduce GHG emissions with minimal land expansion. Other studies have looked into the potential of alternate wetting and drying irrigation practices to mitigate emissions from rice fields (Sander et al., 2020 ).

Future work could explore the following topic areas: demand-driven research and capacity building on climate information and environmental monitoring; nature-based solutions for climate mitigation and adaptation; water–energy–food nexus in rice farming; the nexus of climate change and conflict in rice farming communities; the potentials and pitfalls of social capital in farmer’s everyday adaptation; just energy transitions in rice farming; vulnerabilities from and traditional/local/indigenous ways of adapting to climate change, including the various learning strategies communities use for its preservation; and examples, potentials, and barriers in adopting climate-smart agriculture technologies and practices.

Demographic transitions and aging farmers

Farmers are in various stages and speeds of aging globally (Rigg et al., 2020 ). Evidence of aging farmers in the Global North has been reported in Australia (O’Callaghan and Warburton, 2017 ; Rogers et al., 2013 ), the Czech Republic (Zagata et al., 2015 ), England (Hamilton et al., 2015 ), Japan (Poungchompu et al., 2012 ; Usman et al., 2021 ), and the United States of America (Mitchell et al., 2008 ; Reed, 2008 ; Yudelman and Kealy, 2000 ). Similarly, in the Global South, HelpAge International ( 2014 , p. 21) reported that “there has been a universal trend of an increase in the proportion of older people… attached to agricultural holdings… across [Low and Middle-income Countries in] Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean.” Moreover, farming populations are aging rapidly in East and Southeast Asia (Rigg et al., 2020 ) and southern Africa (HelpAge, 2014 ). Despite this, the literature on aging farmers in Southeast Asian countries remains scant, except for case studies conducted in some villages and provinces in Thailand (Poungchompu et al., 2012 ; Rigg et al., 2018 , 2020 ) and the Philippines (Moya et al., 2015 ; Palis, 2020 ).

Rice farmers’ quiet but critical demographic transformation in Indonesia and the Philippines has not received much attention from scientists, policymakers, and development practitioners. The impacts of aging farmers on the micro-, meso-, and macro-level agricultural processes and outcomes are important issues that require urgent attention. Studies done in other countries could guide future work to explore these questions in Indonesia and the Philippines. These include aging’s potential negative implications in terms of agricultural efficiency and productivity (e.g., Tram and McPherson ( 2016 ) in Vietnam, and Szabo et al. ( 2021 ) in Thailand), food security (e.g., Bhandari and Mishra ( 2018 ) in Asia), farming continuity and sustainability (e.g., O’Callaghan and Warburton ( 2017 ) in Australia, Palis ( 2020 ) in the Philippines, and Rigg et al. ( 2018 , 2020 ) in Thailand), aging and feminization of farm labor (e.g., Liu et al. ( 2019 ) in China), cleaner production behaviors (e.g., Liu et al. ( 2021 ) in Northern China), youth barriers to farm entry (e.g., Zagata and Sutherland ( 2015 ) in Europe), and health and well-being of aging farmers (Jacka, 2018 ; Rogers et al., 2013 ; Ye et al., 2017 ).

Other critical new topics include the (dis)engagement and re-engagement of young people in rice farming; gender dynamics—including structures and systems of inclusion and/or exclusion—in rice production; the impacts of migration and return migration to farming households; community-based and policy-oriented case studies that provide examples of successfully engaging and retaining youth workers in farming; and social protection measures for aging farmers, to name a few.

Contemporary and emerging challenges

One of the biggest and most visible contemporary global challenges is the Covid-19 pandemic. Most pronounced is the pandemic’s impacts on the healthcare system and the economic toll it caused on the lives and livelihoods of people, including rice farmers. Only 0.18% (4 articles) of our dataset have investigated the impacts of Covid-19 on rice systems in Indonesia and the Philippines. Ling et al. ( 2021 ) assessed the effects of the pandemic on the domestic rice supply vis-à-vis food security among ASEAN member-states. They found that Singapore and Malaysia were highly vulnerable to a pandemic-induced rice crisis, while Brunei, Indonesia, and the Philippines are moderately vulnerable. They argued that Southeast Asian rice importers should consider alternative import strategies to reduce their high-risk reliance on rice supply from Thailand and Vietnam and look for other suppliers in other continents.

Rice prices did not change in the early months of the pandemic in Indonesia (Nasir et al., 2021 ); however, as the health emergency progressed, distributors and wholesalers incurred additional costs due to pandemic-induced mobility restrictions (Erlina and Elbaar, 2021 ). In the Philippines, San Juan ( 2021 ) argues that the global rice supply disruption due to the pandemic proves that the country cannot heavily rely on rice imports; instead, it should work on strengthening its domestic rice supply. To realize this, he recommended drastic investments in agriculture and research, rural solar electrification, and the promotion of research on increasing rice yields, boosting productivity, and planting sustainably as feasible steps on the road to rice self-sufficiency.

The ways and extent to which the pandemic negatively affected or exacerbated the vulnerabilities of rice farmers and other value chain actors remain an understudied area in the social studies of rice. Scholars could study the pandemic’s impacts in conjunction with other contemporary and emerging challenges like climate change, weather extremes, aging, conflict, and poverty. Scholars could also explore the medium- and longer-term impacts of the pandemic on rice production, unemployment risks, rice supply and nutrition security of farming households, and the potential and extent to which economic stimulus can benefit rice farmers, to name a few. Most importantly, the pandemic allows researchers and governments to assess the business-as-usual approach that resulted in the disastrous impacts of the pandemic on different sectors, including rice farmers, and hopefully devise strategies to learn from these experiences.

From our review of 2243 articles, cumulatively written by 6893 authors using almost 80,000 references, we conclude that a voluminous amount of rice research has been conducted in Indonesia and the Philippines since 2001. As in other reviews, (e.g., on energy research by Sovacool, 2014 ), our results show that women scholars remain underrepresented in rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines. While interdisciplinary collaboration is abundant, most of these studies belong to the natural sciences with minimal contributions from the social sciences, arts, and humanities. University and research institutions contributed the most to rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines: from hybrid rice cultivars, water management, and technology adoption to socio-cultural, political, economic, and policy issues. Influential scholars in the field were affiliated with the IRRI, which can be expected given the institute’s focus on rice, and key agriculture-focused universities and government bureaus such as the University of the Philippines and the PhilRice in the Philippines, and the Institut Pertanian Bogor University and the Universitas Gadja Maja in Indonesia. We also discussed some examples of economic, political, and policy studies; social, anthropological, and cultural research; social and environmental psychology; climate change, weather extremes, and disaster risk reduction; demographic transitions; and contemporary and emerging issues and studies on rice in the two Southeast Asian countries. Ultimately, we hope that this systematic review can help illuminate key topic areas of rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines and magnify the crucial contributions from and possible research areas and questions that interdisciplinary and comparative social scientists can further explore.

Data availability

The dataset analyzed in this study is available in the Figshare online repository via https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17284814.v2 . All codes about Bibliometrix are available at https://bibliometrix.org/ .

Addor N, Melsen LA (2019) Legacy, rather than adequacy, drives the selection of hydrological models. Water Resour Res 55(1):378–390. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022958

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

Afa LO, Purwoko BS, Junaedi A, Haridjaja O, Dewi IS (2018) Screening of hybrid rice tolerance through stimulated condition of drought stress in rainfed lowland. Biosci Res 15(3):1630–1637

Google Scholar  

Aguilar CHM, Altoveros NC, Borromeo TH, Dayo MHF, Koohafkan P (2021) Traditional rice-based agroecosystem in Kiangan, Ifugao, Philippines: drivers of change, resilience, and potential trajectories. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst 45(2):296–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2020.1813861

Article   Google Scholar  

Aiken SR (2004) Runaway fires, smoke‐haze pollution, and unnatural disasters in Indonesia. Geogr Rev 94(1):55–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2004.tb00158.x

Alejo LA, Ella VB (2019) Assessing the impacts of climate change on dependable flow and potential irrigable area using the swat model. The case of maasin river watershed in Laguna, Philippines. J Agric Eng 50(2):88–98. https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2018.941

Allport GW (1985) The historical background of social psychology. In: Lindzey G, Aronson E (eds.) The handbook of social psychology. McGraw Hill

American Psychological Association (2014a) A career in climate and environmental psychology. https://www.apa.org/education-career/guide/subfields/environment/education-training

American Psychological Association (2014b) Social psychology examines interpersonal relationships. https://www.apa.org/education-career/guide/subfields/social

Anderies JM, Janssen MA, Lee A, Wasserman H (2013) Environmental variability and collective action: experimental insights from an irrigation game. Ecol Econ 93:166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.010

Ansari A, Lin Y-P, Lur H-S (2021) Evaluating and adapting climate change impacts on rice production in Indonesia: a case study of the Keduang subwatershed, Central Java. Environments-MDPI 8(11) https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8110117

Antle JM, Pingali PL (1994) Pesticides, productivity, and farmer health: a Philippine case study. Am J Agric Econ 76(3):418–430. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243654

Aprizal, Alisjahbana SW, Nurhasanah A (2021) The development of the flood inundation area model in the way Sekampung subwatershed in Lampung. Rev Int Geogr Educ 11(3):1246–1256. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.800567

Aria M, Alterisio A, Scandurra A, Pinelli C, D’Aniello B (2021) The scholar’s best friend: research trends in dog cognitive and behavioral studies. Animal Cogn 24(3):541–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01448-2

Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr 11(4):959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Arif C, Setiawan BI, Sofiyuddin HA, Martief LM, Mizoguchi M, Doi R (2012) Estimating crop coefficient in intermittent irrigation paddy fields using excel solver. Rice Sci 19(2):143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6308(12)60033-X

Arif C, Toriyama K, Nugroho BDA, Mizoguchi M (2015) Crop coefficient and water productivity in conventional and system of rice intensification (SRI) irrigation regimes of terrace rice fields in Indonesia. J Teknol 76(15):97–102. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.5958

Asian Development Bank (ed.) (2002) Indigenous peoples/ethnic minorities and poverty reduction. Environment and Social Safeguard Division, Regional and Sustainable Development Department, Asian Development Bank

Awan TH, Chauhan BS, Sta Cruz PC (2014) Influence of environmental factors on the germination of Urena lobata L. and its response to herbicides. PLoS ONE 9(3) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090305

Awan TH, Cruz PCS, Chauhan BS (2015) Efficacy and economics of different herbicides, their weed species selectivity, and the productivity of mechanized dry-seeded rice. Crop Prot 78:239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.09.016

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Bairagi S, Custodio MC, Durand-Morat A, Demont M (2021) Preserving cultural heritage through the valorization of Cordillera Heirloom rice in the Philippines. Agric Hum Values 38(1):257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10159-w

Bairagi S, Demont M, Custodio MC, Ynion J (2020) What drives consumer demand for rice fragrance? Evidence from South and Southeast Asia. Br Food J 122(11):3473–3498. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2019-0025

Bairagi S, Gustafson CR, Custodio MC, Ynion J, Demont M (2021) What drives consumer demand for packaged rice? Evidence from South and Southeast Asia. Food Control 129 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108261

Bajwa AA, Chauhan BS (2017) Rice production in Australia. In: Chauhan BS, Jabran K, Mahajan G (eds.) Rice production worldwide. Springer International Publishing, pp. 169–184

Balié J, Valera HG (2020) Domestic and international impacts of the rice trade policy reform in the Philippines. Food Policy 92 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101876

Balogbog KJM, Gomez NU (2020) Determinants of productivity and technical efficiency of upland rice farming system in Sarangani Province, Phillipines. Mindanao J Sci Technol 18(2):125–137

Banayo NPMC, Bueno CS, Haefele SM, Desamero NV, Kato Y (2018) Site-specific nutrient management enhances sink size, a major yield constraint in rainfed lowland rice. Field Crops Res 224:76–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.05.006

Banayo NPMC, Haefele SM, Desamero NV, Kato Y (2018) On-farm assessment of site-specific nutrient management for rainfed lowland rice in the Philippines. Field Crops Res 220:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.09.011

Bankoff G (2003) Cultures of disaster: society and natural hazards in the Philippines. RoutledgeCurzon

Bankoff G (2007) Dangers to going it alone: social capital and the origins of community resilience in the Philippines. Contin Change 22(2):327–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416007006315

Bankoff G (2016) Hazardousness of place a new comparative approach to the Filipino past. Philipp Stud: Hist Ethnogr Viewp 64(3/4):335–357

Belder P, Bouman BAM, Cabangon R, Guoan L, Quilang EJP, Yuanhua L, Spiertz JHJ, Tuong TP(2004) Effect of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia. Agric Water Manag 65(3):193–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2003.09.002

Beltran JC, Pannell DJ, Doole GJ (2012) Economic implications of herbicide resistance and high labour costs for management of annual barnyardgrass ( Echinochloa crus-galli ) in Philippine rice farming systems. Crop Prot 31(1):31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.09.012

Beltran JC, White B, Burton M, Doole GJ, Pannell DJ (2013) Determinants of herbicide use in rice production in the Philippines. Agric Econ (UK) 44(1):45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00631.x

Bhandari H, Mishra AK (2018) Impact of demographic transformation on future rice farming in Asia. Outlook Agric 47(2):125–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727018769676

Biel A, Gärling T (1995) The role of uncertainty in resource dilemmas. J Environ Psychol 15(3):221–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90005-5

Biodiversitas (2021) Aims and scope|biodiversitas. J Biol Divers https://smujo.id/biodiv/aimsandscope

Bouman BAM, Humphreys E, Tuong TP, Barker R (2007) Rice and water. In: Advances in agronomy, vol 92. Elsevier, pp. 187–237

Bouman BAM, Peng S, Castañeda AR, Visperas RM (2005) Yield and water use of irrigated tropical aerobic rice systems. Agric Water Manag 74(2):87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.11.007

Bouman BAM, Tuong TP (2001) Field water management to save water and increase its productivity in irrigated lowland rice. Agric Water Manag 49(1):11–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00128-1

Bradley K, Mallick R, Andikagumi H, Hubbard J, Meilianda E, Switzer A, Du N, Brocard G, Alfian D, Benazir B, Feng G, Yun S-H, Majewski J, Wei S, Hill EM (2019) Earthquake-triggered 2018 Palu Valley landslides enabled by wet rice cultivation. Nat Geosci 12(11):935–939. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0444-1

Article   ADS   CAS   Google Scholar  

Broad R, Cavanagh J (2012) The development and agriculture paradigms transformed: reflections from the small-scale organic rice fields of the Philippines. J Peasant Stud 39(5):1181–1193. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.722082

Cabasan MTN, Tabora JAG, Cabatac NN, Jumao-as CM, Soberano JO, Turba JV, Dagamac NHA, Barlaan E (2019) Economic and ecological perspectives of farmers on rice insect pest management. Global J Environ Sci Manag 5(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2019.01.03

Carpenter D (2003) An investigation into the transition from technological to ecological rice farming among resource poor farmers from the Philippine island of Bohol. Agric Hum Values 20(2):165–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024013509602

Chandra A, Dargusch P, McNamara KE, Caspe AM, Dalabajan D (2017) A Study of Climate-Smart Farming Practices and Climate-resiliency Field Schools in Mindanao, the Philippines. World Dev 98:214–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.028

Chauhan BS (2011) Crowfootgrass ( Dactyloctenium aegyptium ) germination and response to herbicides in the Philippines. Weed Sci 59(4):512–516. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00048.1

Chauhan BS, Abugho SB (2012) Threelobe morningglory ( Ipomoea triloba ) germination and response to herbicides. Weed Sci 60(2):199–204. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00137.1

Chauhan BS, Johnson DE (2009) Seed germination ecology of junglerice ( Echinochloa colona ): a major weed of rice. Weed Sci 57(3):235–240. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-08-141.1

Chiang S-N (2020) Transecting the fall and rise of brown rice—the historic encounters of the global food system, nutrition science, and malnutrition in the Philippines. Food Cult Soc 23(2):229–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2019.1682889

Chrisendo D, Krishna VV, Siregar H, Qaim M (2020) Land-use change, nutrition, and gender roles in Indonesian farm households. Forest Policy Econ 118 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102245

Coe K, Scacco J (2017) Content analysis, quantitative. In: Matthes J, Davis CS, Potter RF (eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research methods, 1st edn. Wiley

Connor M, de Guia AH, Pustika AB, Sudarmaji, Kobarsih M, Hellin J (2021) Rice farming in central java, Indonesia—adoption of sustainable farming practices, impacts and implications. Agronomy 11(5) https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050881

Cuaton GP, Caluza LJB, Neo JFV (2021) A topic modeling analysis on the early phase of COVID-19 response in the Philippines. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 61:102367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102367

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Cuccurullo C, Aria M, Sarto F (2016) Foundations and trends in performance management. A twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains. Scientometrics 108(2):595–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1948-8

De Datta SK (1981) Principle and practices of rice production. John Wiley and Sons.

Della Corte V, Del Gaudio G, Sepe F, Sciarelli F (2019) Sustainable tourism in the open innovation realm: a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability 11(21):6114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216114

DeWalt BR (1985) Anthropology, sociology, and farming systems research. Hum Organ 44(2):106–114

Dipti SS, Bergman C, Indrasari SD, Herath T, Hall R, Lee H, Habibi F, Bassinello PZ, Graterol E, Ferraz JP, Fitzgerald M (2012) The potential of rice to offer solutions for malnutrition and chronic diseases. Rice 5(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-8433-5-16

Disyacitta Nariswari RA, Lauder MRMT (2021) Agricultural terms in rice production: a dialectological study [TÉrminos agrÍcolas en la producciÓn de arroz: Un estudio dialectal]. Dialectologia 26:145–178. https://doi.org/10.1344/DIALECTOLOGIA2021.26.7

Doliente SS, Samsatli S (2021) Integrated production of food, energy, fuels and chemicals from rice crops: multi-objective optimisation for efficient and sustainable value chains. J Clean Prod 285 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124900

Dominik C, Seppelt R, Horgan FG, Settele J, Václavík T (2018) Landscape composition, configuration, and trophic interactions shape arthropod communities in rice agroecosystems. J Appl Ecol 55(5):2461–2472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13226

Dominko M, Verbič M (2019) The economics of subjective well-being: a bibliometric analysis. J Happiness Stud 20(6):1973–1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0022-z

Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM (2021) How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res 133:285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Doorman F (1990) A social science contribution to applied agricultural research for the small farm sector: the diagnostic case study as a tool for problem identification. Agricult Syst 32(3):273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(90)90005-B

Doorman F (1991) Adept at adapting. Contributions of sociology to agricultural research for small farmers in developing countries: the case of rice in the Dominican Republic. Wagening Stud Sociol https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40176828_Adept_at_adapting_Contributions_of_sociology_to_agricultural_research_for_small_farmers_in_developing_countries_the_case_of_rice_in_the_Dominican_Republic

Ducusin RJC, Espaldon MVO, Rebancos CM, De Guzman LEP (2019) Vulnerability assessment of climate change impacts on a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System (GIAHS) in the Philippines: the case of Batad Rice Terraces, Banaue, Ifugao, Philippines. Clim Change https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02397-7

Dulbari, Santosa E, Koesmaryono Y, Sulistyono E, Wahyudi A, Agusta H, Guntoro D (2021) Local adaptation to extreme weather and it’s implication on sustainable rice production in Lampung, Indonesia. Agrivita 43(1):125–136. https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v43i1.2338

Ebitani T, Hayashi N, Omoteno M, Ozaki H, Yano M, Morikawa M, Fukuta Y (2011) Characterization of Pi13, a blast resistance gene that maps to chromosome 6 in Indica rice ( Oryza sativa L. variety, Kasalath). Breed Sci 61(3):251–259. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.61.251

Elsevier (2021) About Scopus—Abstract and citation database. Elsevier

Engelbert EA (1953) Agriculture and the political process. In: Increasing understanding of public problems and policies. AgEconSearch Res Agric Appl Econ https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.17209

Erlina Y, Elbaar EF (2021) Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on local rice supply chain flow patterns in Kapuas regency, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. WSEAS Trans Bus Econ 18:941–948. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2021.18.89

Fabro L, Varca LM (2012) Pesticide usage by farmers in Pagsanjan-Lumban catchment of Laguna de Bay, Philippines. Agric Water Manag 106:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.08.011

Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22(2):338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Fang AH (2016) Linkage between rural voters and politicians: effects on rice policies in the Philippines and Thailand: voter–politician linkage & rice policies. Asia Pacif Policy Stud 3(3):505–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.150

Ferrero A, Nguyen NV (2004) The sustainable development of rice-based production systems in Europe. https://www.fao.org/3/y5682e/y5682e0g.htm

Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Hill J, Monfreda C, Polasky S, Rockström J, Sheehan J, Siebert S, Zaks DPM (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478(7369):337–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Gaillard JC (2010) Vulnerability, capacity and resilience: perspectives for climate and development policy. J Int Dev 22(2):218–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1675

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Gata L, Losloso J, Nilo P (2020) Gender and the use of climate information in agricultural decision-making amidst climate change: the case of rice and corn production in oriental Mindoro, Philippines. Philipp Agric Sci 103(Special issue):93–104

Gergon EB, Miller SA, Davide RG, Opina OS, Obien SR (2001) Evaluation of cultural practices (surface burning, deep ploughing, organic amendments) for management of rice root-knot nematode in rice–onion cropping system and their effect on onion ( Allium cepa L.) yield. Int J Pest Manag 47(4):265–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670870110047118

Gergon EB, Miller SA, Halbrendt JM, Davide RG (2002) Effect of rice root-knot nematode on growth and yield of Yellow Granex onion. Plant Dis 86(12):1339–1344. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.12.1339

Gil JDB, Reidsma P, Giller K, Todman L, Whitmore A, van Ittersum M (2019) Sustainable development goal 2: Improved targets and indicators for agriculture and food security. Ambio 48(7):685–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1101-4

Glaeser B (ed.) (2010) The green revolution revisited, 1st edn. Routledge.

Glänzel W, Schubert A (2005) Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In Moed HF, Glänzel W, Schmoch U (eds.) Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 257–276

Gott RC, Coyle DR (2019) Educated and engaged communicators are critical to successful integrated pest management adoption. J Integr Pest Manag 10(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmz033

Grant WP (2012) Can political science contribute to agricultural policy. Policy Soc 31(4):271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.09.001

Griskevicius V, Ackerman JM, Cantú SM, Delton AW, Robertson TE, Simpson JA, Thompson ME, Tybur JM (2013) When the economy falters, do people spend or save? Responses to resource scarcity depend on childhood environments. Psychol Sci 24(2):197–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612451471

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Hadiprayitno II (2017) The limit of narratives: ethnicity and indigenous rights in Papua, Indonesia. Int J Minor Group Rights 24(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02401004

Halwart M, Litsinger JA, Viray MC, Kaule G (2014) Efficacy of common carp and Nile tilapia as biocontrol agents of the golden apple snail in the Philippines. Philipp J Sci 143(2):125–136

Hamilton W, Bosworth G, Ruto E (2015) Entrepreneurial younger farmers and the “young farmer problem” in England. Agric For 61(4):61–69

Hanif KI, Herlinda S, Irsan C, Pujiastuti Y, Prabawati G, Hasbi, Karenina T (2020) The impact of bioinsecticide overdoses of Beauveria bassiana on species diversity and abundance of not targeted arthropods in South Sumatra (Indonesia) freshwater swamp paddy. Biodiversitas 21(5):2124–2136. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210541

Hantrais L (1995) Comparative research methods. Soc Res Update 13(Summer):2–11

Heckelman A, Smukler S, Wittman H (2018) Cultivating climate resilience: a participatory assessment of organic and conventional rice systems in the Philippines. Renew Agric Food Syst 33(3):225–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000709

HelpAge (2014) The ageing of rural populations: evidence on older farmers in low and middle-income countries. HelpAge International, p. 24

Herlinda S, Prabawati G, Pujiastuti Y, Susilawati, Karenina T, Hasbi, Irsan C (2020) Herbivore insects and predatory arthropods in freshwater swamp rice field in South Sumatra, Indonesia sprayed with bioinsecticides of entomopathogenic fungi and abamectin. Biodiversitas 21(8):3755–3768. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210843

Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(46):16569–16572

Hohl R, Jiang Z, Tue Vu M, Vijayaraghavan S, Liong S-Y (2021) Using a regional climate model to develop index-based drought insurance for sovereign disaster risk transfer. Agric Finance Rev 81(1):151–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-02-2020-0020

Horgan FG, Bernal CC, Vu Q, Almazan MLP, Ramal AF, Yasui H, Fujita D (2018) Virulence adaptation in a rice leafhopper: exposure to ineffective genes compromises pyramided resistance. Crop Prot 113:40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.07.010

Horgan FG, Martínez EC, Stuart AM, Bernal CC, Martín EC, Almazan MLP, Ramal AF (2019) Effects of vegetation strips, fertilizer levels and varietal resistance on the integrated management of arthropod biodiversity in a tropical rice ecosystem. Insects 10(10) https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10100328

Horgan FG, Romena AM, Bernal CC, Almazan MLP, Ramal AF (2021) Differences between the strength of preference-performance coupling in two rice stemborers (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae, Crambidae) promotes coexistence at field-plot scales. Environ Entomol 50(4):929–939. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvab034

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Intal PS, Garcia MC (2005) Rice and Philippine politics. Working Paper No. 2005–13. PIDS Discussion Paper Series. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/127899

IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press

IRRI (1982) The role of anthropologists and other social scientists in interdisciplinary teams developing improved food production technology. International Rice Research Institute, p. 103

IRRI (2013) Rice almanac: source book for the most important economic activities on Earth, 4th edn. IRRI

Iyer AS, McCouch SR (2004) The rice bacterial blight resistance gene xa5 encodes a novel form of disease resistance. Mol Plant–Microbe Interact® 17(12):1348–1354. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.12.1348

Jacka T (2018) Translocal family reproduction and agrarian change in China: a new analytical framework. J Peasant Stud 45(7):1341–1359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1314267

Jenkins KEH, Sovacool BK, Mouter N, Hacking N, Burns M-K, McCauley D (2021) The methodologies, geographies, and technologies of energy justice: a systematic and comprehensive review. Environ Res Lett 16(4):043009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd78c

John A, Fielding M (2014) Rice production constraints and ‘new’ challenges for South Asian smallholders: Insights into de facto research priorities. Agric Food Secur 3(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/2048-7010-3-18

Juliano LM, Casimero MC, Llewellyn R (2010) Multiple herbicide resistance in barnyardgrass ( Echinochloa crus-galli ) in direct-seeded rice in the Philippines. Int J Pest Manag 56(4):299–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2010.495795

Kadeawi S, Swaruno, Nasution A, Hairmansis A, Telebanco-Yanoria MJ, Obara M, Hayashi N, Fukuta Y (2021) Pathogenicity of isolates of the rice blast pathogen ( Pyricularia oryzae ) from Indonesia. Plant Disease 105(3):675–683. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-20-0949-RE

Kauffman HE, Reddy APK, Hsieh SPY, Merca SD (1973) An improved technique for evaluating resistance of rice varieties to Xanthomonas oryzae . Plant Disease Report 57:537–541

Kelman I (2020) Disaster by choice: how our actions turn natural hazards into catastrophes (new product). Oxford University Press.

Kelman I, Gaillard JC, Mercer J (2015) Climate change’s role in disaster risk reduction’s future: beyond vulnerability and resilience. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 6(1):21–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-015-0038-5

Khatun MM, Siddik MS, Rahman MA, Khaled S (2021) Content analysis of Covid-19 and agriculture news in Bangladesh using topic modeling algorithm. Curr Appl Sci Technol 21(02):299–317

Khumairoh U, Lantinga EA, Schulte RPO, Suprayogo D, Groot JCJ (2018) Complex rice systems to improve rice yield and yield stability in the face of variable weather conditions. Sci Rep 8(1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32915-z

Kim K-H, Raymundo AD, Aikins CM (2019) Development of a rice tungro epidemiological model for seasonal disease risk management in the Philippines. Eur J Agron 109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2019.04.006

Komatsuzaki M, Syuaib MF (2010) Comparison of the farming system and carbon sequestration between conventional and organic rice production in West Java, Indonesia. Sustainability 2(3):833–843. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2030833

Kraehmer H, Thomas C, Vidotto F (2017) Rice production in Europe. In Chauhan BS, Jabran K, Mahajan G (eds.) Rice production worldwide. Springer International Publishing, pp. 93–116

Kulp SA, Strauss BH (2019) New elevation data triple estimates of global vulnerability to sea-level rise and coastal flooding. Nat Commun 10(1):4844. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12808-z

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Kumar S, Tripathi S, Singh SP, Prasad A, Akter F, Syed MA, Badri J, Das SP, Bhattarai R, Natividad MA, Quintana M, Venkateshwarlu C, Raman A, Yadav S, Singh SK, Swain P, Anandan A, Yadaw RB, Mandal NP, Henry A (2021) Rice breeding for yield under drought has selected for longer flag leaves and lower stomatal density. J Exp Bot 72(13):4981–4992. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab160

Laborte AG, Paguirigan NC, Moya PF, Nelson A, Sparks AH, Gregorio GB (2015) Farmers’ preference for rice traits: insights from farm surveys in Central Luzon, Philippines, 1966–2012. PLoS ONE 10(8):e0136562. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136562

Laiprakobsup T (2014) Populism and agricultural trade in developing countries: a case study of Thailand’s rice-pledging scheme. Int Rev Public Adm 19(4):380–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2014.967000

Lakitan B, Alberto A, Lindiana L, Kartika K, Herlinda S, Kurnianingsih A (2018) The benefits of biochar on rice growth and yield in tropical riparian wetland, South Sumatra, Indonesia. Chiang Mai Univ J Nat Sci 17(2):111–126. https://doi.org/10.12982/CMUJNS.2018.0009

Lampayan RM, Samoy-Pascual KC, Sibayan EB, Ella VB, Jayag OP, Cabangon RJ, Bouman BAM (2015) Effects of alternate wetting and drying (AWD) threshold level and plant seedling age on crop performance, water input, and water productivity of transplanted rice in Central Luzon, Philippines. Paddy Water Environ 13(3):215–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-014-0423-5

Lapuz RR, Javier S, Aquino JDC, Undan JR (2019) Gene expression and sequence analysis of BADH1 gene in CLSU aromatic rice ( Oryza sativa L.) accessions subjected to drought and saline condition. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 65:S196–S199. https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.65.S196

Ling TJ, Shamsudin MN, Bing WZ, Thi Cam Nhung P, Rabbany MG (2021) Mitigating the impacts of COVID-19 on domestic rice supply and food security in Southeast Asia. Outlook Agric 50(3):328–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270211024275

Litsinger JA, Canapi BL, Bandong JP (2011) Cultural practices mitigate irrigated rice insect pest losses in the Philippines. Philipp J Sci 140(2):179–194

Liu J, Du S, Fu Z (2021) The impact of rural population aging on farmers’ cleaner production behavior: evidence from five provinces of the North China Plain. Sustainability 13(21):12199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112199

Liu J, Xu Z, Zheng Q, Hua L (2019) Is the feminization of labor harmful to agricultural production? The decision-making and production control perspective. J Integr Agric 18(6):1392–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62649-3

Lopez MV, Mendoza TC (2004) Management options for salt-affected rice-based farming systems during the El Niño and La Niña phenomena. J Sustain Agric 23(4):19–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v23n04_04

Mackill DJ, Bonman JM (1992) Inheritance of rice resistance in near-isogenic lines of rice. Phytopathology 82:746–749

Macrae G (2011) Rice farming in Bali organic production and marketing challenges. Crit Asian Stud 43(1):69–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2011.537852

MacRae GS, Arthawiguna IWA (2011) Sustainable agricultural development in Bali: is the Subak an obstacle, an agent or subject. Hum Ecol 39(1):11–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-011-9386-y

Mahajan G, Kumar V, Chauhan BS (2017) Rice production in India. In: Chauhan BS, Jabran K, Mahajan G (eds.) Rice production worldwide. Springer International Publishing, pp. 53–91

Manalo IJA, van de Fliert E, Fielding E (2020) Rice farmers adapting to drought in the Philippines. Int J Agric Sustain 18(6):594–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2020.1807301

Martawijaya S, Montgomery RD (2004) Bureaucrats as entrepreneurs: a case study of organic rice production in East Java. Bull Indones Econ Stud 40(2):243–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007491042000205303

Mendoza TC (2004) Evaluating the benefits of organic farming in rice agroecosystems in the Philippines. J Sustain Agric 24(2):93–115. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v24n02

Mew TW (1987) Current Status and future prospects of research on bacterial blight of rice. Annu Rev Phytopathol 25(1):359–382. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.25.090187.002043

Minas AM, Mander S, McLachlan C (2020) How can we engage farmers in bioenergy development? Building a social innovation strategy for rice straw bioenergy in the Philippines and Vietnam. Energy Res Soc Sci 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101717

Misdawita, Hartono D, Nugroho A (2019) Impacts of food prices on the economy: social accounting matrix and microsimulation approach in Indonesia. Rev Urban Reg Dev Stud 31(1–2):137–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/rurd.12099

Mitchell J, Bradley D, Wilson J, Goins RT (2008) The aging farm population and rural aging research. J Agromed 13(2):95–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599240802125383

Mizobuchi R, Sato H, Fukuoka S, Yamamato S, Kawasaki-Tanaka A, Fukuta Y (2014) Mapping of a QTL for field resistance to blast ( Pyricularia oryzae Cavara) in Ingngoppor-tinawon, a rice ( Oryza sativa L.) landrace from the Philippines. Japan Agric Res Q 48(4):425–431. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.48.425

Mizuno K, Mugniesyah SS, Herianto AS, Tsujii H (2013) Talun-Huma, Swidden agriculture, and rural economy in West Java, Indonesia. Southeast Asian Stud 2(2):351–381

Moya P, Kajisa K, Barker R, Mohanty S, Gascon F, San Valentin MR (2015) Changes in rice farming in the Philippines: insights from five decades of a household-level survey. International Rice Research Institute.

Mucharam I, Rustiadi E, Fauzi A, Harianto (2020) Assessment of rice farming sustainability: evidence from Indonesia provincial data. Int J Sustain Dev Plan 15(8):1323–13332. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.150819

Muhardi, Effendy (2021) Technical efficiency and the factors that affect it in rice production in Indonesia. Asian J Agric Rural Dev 11(3):230–235. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.ajard.2021.113.230.235

Mulyani A, Darwanto DH, Widodo S, Masyhuri (2020) Production efficiency of inpago unsoed-1 and situbagendit rice farming in central Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 21(7):3276–3286. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210751

Munajati SL, Kartodihardjo H, Saleh MB, Nurwadjedi (2021) Ecosystem services dynamics in Bogor Regency. Indones J Geogr 53(2):264–273. https://doi.org/10.22146/IJG.64493

Muthayya S, Sugimoto JD, Montgomery S, Maberly GF (2014) An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption: global rice production, consumption, and trade. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1324(1):7–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12540

Article   ADS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Nasir MA, Jamhar, Mulyo JH, Dumasari D (2021) Spatial study on How COVID-19 affects the Indonesian rice markets integration: period of March to July 2020. Rev Int Geogr Educ 11(4):672–683. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.8006781

Neyra-Cabatac NM, Pulhin JM, Cabanilla DB (2012) Indigenous agroforestry in a changing context: the case of the Erumanen ne Menuvu in Southern Philippines. Forest Policy Econ 22:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.01.007

Niones JM, Lipio PLG, Cruz AS, Cabral MCJ, Hautea DM, Lucob-Agustin N, Suralta RR (2021) Genome-wide association mapping for the identification of SNPs controlling lateral root plasticity in selected rice germplasms of the Philippines. Philipp J Sci 150(3):663–674

Noviar H, Masbar R, Aliasuddin, Syahnur S, Zulham T, Saputra J (2020) The agricultural commercialisation and its impact on economy management: an application of duality-neoclassic and stochastic frontier approach. Ind Eng Manag Syst 19(3):510–519. https://doi.org/10.7232/iems.2020.19.3.510

Nugroho BDA, Toriyama K, Kobayashi K, Arif C, Yokoyama S, Mizoguchi M (2018) Effect of intermittent irrigation following the system of rice intensification (SRI) on rice yield in a farmer’s paddy fields in Indonesia. Paddy Water Environ 16(4), 715–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-018-0663-x

O’Callaghan Z, Warburton J (2017) No one to fill my shoes: narrative practices of three ageing Australian male farmers. Ageing Soc 37(3):441–461. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1500118X

Official Gazette of the Philippines (2021) Executive order no. 1061, s. 1985|GOVPH. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://mirror.officialgazette.gov.ph/1985/11/05/executive-order-no-1061-s-1985/

Oladele OI, Boago C (2011) Content analysis of agricultural news in Botswana newspapers. J Hum Ecol 36(3):173–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2011.11906432

Ou SK (1985) Rice diseases, 2nd edn. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau.

Orge RF, Sawey DA, Leal LV, Gagelonia EC (2020) Re-engineering the paddy rice drying system in the Philippines for climate change adaptation Dry Technol 38(11):1462–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2019.1648289

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Palis FG (2020) Aging filipino rice farmers and their aspirations for their children. Philipp J Sci 149(2):321–331

Palis FG, Lampayan RM, Flor RJ, Sibayan E (2017) A multi-stakeholder partnership for the dissemination of alternate wetting and drying water-saving technology for rice farmers in the Philippines. AIMS Agric Food 2(3):290–309. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2017.3.290

Panuju DR, Mizuno K, Trisasongko BH (2013) The dynamics of rice production in Indonesia 1961–2009. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 12(1):27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2012.05.002

Papademetriou M, Dent F, Herath E (eds.) (2000) Bridging the rice yield gap in the Asia-Pacific Region. UNFAO

Parwanto NB, Oyama T (2014) A statistical analysis and comparison of historical earthquake and tsunami disasters in Japan and Indonesia. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 7:122–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.10.003

Pasiona SP, Nidoy MGM, Manalo IV JA (2021) Modified listening group method as a knowledge-sharing and learning mechanism in agricultural communities in the Philippines. J Agric Educ Ext 27(1):89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1816477

Peng S, Cassman KG, Virmani SS, Sheehy J, Khush GS (1999) Yield potential trends of tropical rice since the release of IR8 and the challenge of increasing rice yield potential. Crop Sci 39(6):1552–1559. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961552x

Peng S, Tang Q, Zou Y (2009) Current status and challenges of rice production in China. Plant Prod Sci 12(1):3–8. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.12.3

Perez LM, Redoña ED, Mendioro MS, Vera Cruz CM, Leung H (2008) Introgression of Xa4, Xa7 and Xa21 for resistance to bacterial blight in thermosensitive genetic male sterile rice ( Oryza sativa L.) for the development of two-line hybrids. Euphytica 164(3):627–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9653-1

Pielke R, Linnér B-O (2019) From Green Revolution to Green Evolution: a critique of the political myth of averted famine. Minerva 57(3):265–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09372-7

Pingali PL (2012) Green Revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(31):12302–12308. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912953109

Pingali P, Roger P (eds.) (1995) Impact of pesticides on farmer health and the rice environment. Springer

Poungchompu S, Tsuneo K, Poungchompu P (2012) Aspects of the aging farming population and food security in agriculture for Thailand and Japan. Int J Environ Rural Dev 03(01):1–6

Price JC, Leviston Z (2014) Predicting pro-environmental agricultural practices: the social, psychological and contextual influences on land management. J Rural Stud 34:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.10.001

Prom-u-thai C, Rerkasem B (2020) Rice quality improvement. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 40(4):28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00633-4

Propper CR, Hardy LJ, Howard BD, Flor RJB, Singleton GR (2020) Role of farmer knowledge in agro-ecosystem science: Rice farming and amphibians in the Philippines. Hum–Wildl Interact 14(2) https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85091838772&partnerID=40&md5=4ad2c5129ee2e5bfbe34d6f1505327bc

Putra AS, Tong G, Pribadi DO (2020) Food security challenges in rapidly urbanizing developing countries: insight from Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(22):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229550

Reaño RL, de Padua VAN, Halog AB (2021) Energy efficiency and life cycle assessment with system dynamics of electricity production from rice straw using a combined gasification and internal combustion engine. Energies 14(16) https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164942

Reed DB (2008) America’s aging farmers: tenacious, productive, and underresearched. J Agromed 13(2):69–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599240802293942

Resosudarmo BP (2012) Implementing a national environmental policy: Understanding the ‘success’ of the 1989–1999 integrated pest management programme in Indonesia: the 1989–1999 integrated pest management programme. Singap J Trop Geogr 33(3):365–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12006

Rigg J, Phongsiri M, Promphakping B, Salamanca A, Sripun M (2020) Who will tend the farm? Interrogating the ageing Asian farmer. J Peasant Stud 47(2):306–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1572605

Rigg J, Salamanca A, Phongsiri M, Sripun M (2018) More farmers, less farming? Understanding the truncated agrarian transition in Thailand. World Dev 107:327–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.008

Rochman KL, Misno, Mubarok Z, Bunyamin, Bahrudin (2021) Ngahuma (Planting rice in the fields) and tilled land limitation of the baduy tribe in Indonesia. Geoj Tour Geosites 34(1):63–68. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.34109-620

Rogers M, Barr N, O’Callaghan Z, Brumby S, Warburton J (2013) Healthy ageing: farming into the twilight. Rural Soc 22(3):251–262. https://doi.org/10.5172/rsj.2013.22.3.251

Romanillos RD, Dizon JT, Quimbo MAT, Cruz PCS, Miranda RB (2016) Community development strategies and other factors affecting rice productivity in inland valleys in Quezon province, Luzon, Philippines. Asia Life Sci 25(2):603–620

Rustiadi E, Pravitasari AE, Setiawan Y, Mulya SP, Pribadi DO, Tsutsumida N (2021) Impact of continuous Jakarta megacity urban expansion on the formation of the Jakarta-Bandung conurbation over the rice farm regions. Cities 111 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103000

Ruzol C, Lomente LL, Pulhin J (2020) Mapping access and use of weather and climate information to aid farm decisions in the Philippines. Philipp Agric Sci 103(Special issue):25–39

Ruzol C, Lomente LL, Pulhin J (2021) Cultural consensus knowledge of rice farmers for climate risk management in the Philippines. Clim Risk Manag 32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100298

Salman D, Kasim K, Ahmad A, Sirimorok N (2021) Combination of bonding, bridging and linking social capital in a livelihood system: nomadic duck herders amid the covid-19 pandemic in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Forest Soc 5(1):136–158. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i1.11813

Salsinha YCF, Indradewa D, Purwestri YA, Rachmawati D (2020) Selection of drought-tolerant local rice cultivars from east Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia during vegetative stage Biodiversitas 21(1):170–178. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210122

Salsinha YCF, Maryani, Indradewa D, Purwestri YA, Rachmawati D (2021) Morphological and anatomical characteristics of Indonesian rice roots from East Nusa Tenggara contribute to drought tolerance. Asian J Agric Biol 2021(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.35495/ajab.2020.05.304

Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor laboratory press.

San Juan DM (2021) A review of rice tariffication in the time of COVID-19: rationale and road to rice self-sufficiency in the Philippines. Asia-Pacif Soc Sci Rev 21(4):50–71

Sander BO, Schneider P, Romasanta R, Samoy-Pascual K, Sibayan EB, Asis CA, Wassmann R (2020) Potential of alternate wetting and drying irrigation practices for the mitigation of GHG emissions from rice fields: two cases in central Luzon (Philippines) Agriculture (Switzerland) 10(8):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10080350

Sanjatmiko P (2021) Multispecies ethnography: reciprocal interaction between residents and the environment in Segara Anakan, Indonesia. South East Asia Res 29(3):384–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2021.1978313

Santiago JO, Buot Jr IE (2018) Conceptualizing the socio-ecological resilience of the Chaya rice terraces, a socio-ecological production landscape in Mayoyao, Ifugao, Luzon Island, Philippines. J Mar Island Cult 7(1):107–126. https://doi.org/10.21463/jmic.2018.07.1.07

Satriawan E, Shrestha R (2018) Mistargeting and regressive take up of the Indonesian Rice Subsidy Program. Asian Econ J 32(4):387–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12164

Schaarschmidt S, Lawas LMF, Glaubitz U, Li X, Erban A, Kopka J, Krishna Jagadish SV, Hincha DK, Zuther E (2020) Season affects yield and metabolic profiles of rice ( Oryza sativa ) under high night temperature stress in the field. Int J Mol Sci 21(9) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093187

Sembiring H, Subekti NA, Erythrina, Nugraha D, Priatmojo B, Stuart AM (2020) Yield gap management under seawater intrusion areas of Indonesia to improve rice productivity and resilience to climate change. Agriculture (Switzerland) 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10010001

Sen S, Chakraborty R, Kalita P (2020) Rice—not just a staple food: a comprehensive review on its phytochemicals and therapeutic potential. Trends Food Sci Technol 97:265–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.01.022

Setiawan BI, Irmansyah A, Arif C, Watanabe T, Mizoguchi M, Kato H (2013) Effects of groundwater level on CH4 and N2O emissions under SRI paddy management in Indonesia. Taiwan Water Conserv 61(4):135–146

Shabandeh M (2021) Total global rice consumption 2021. Statista https://www.statista.com/statistics/255977/total-global-rice-consumption/

Sheldon TL, Sankaran C (2017) The impact of Indonesian forest fires on Singaporean pollution and health. Am Econ Rev 107(5):526–529. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171134

Shepherd C, McWilliam A (2011) Ethnography, agency, and materiality: anthropological perspectives on rice development in east Timor. East Asian Sci Technol Soc 5(2):189–215. https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-1262876

Singh V, Zhou S, Ganie Z, Valverde B, Avila L, Marchesan E, Merotto A, Zorrilla G, Burgos N, Norsworthy J, Bagavathiannan M (2017) Rice production in the Americas. In Chauhan BS, Jabran K, Mahajan G (eds.) Rice production worldwide. Springer International Publishing, pp. 137–168

Singleton G (2011) Outwit rats with smart, green solutions. Appropr Technol 38(1):66–67

Singleton GR, Belmain S, Brown PR, Aplin K, Htwe NM (2010) Impacts of rodent outbreaks on food security in Asia. Wildl Res 37(5):355–359. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR10084

Singleton GR, Sudarmaji, Jacob J, Krebs CJ (2005) Integrated management to reduce rodent damage to lowland rice crops in Indonesia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 107(1):75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.09.010

Sovacool BK (2014) What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Res Soc Sci 1:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003

Statista (2021) Topic: natural disasters in the Philippines. Statista https://www.statista.com/topics/5845/natural-disasters-in-the-philippines-at-a-glance/

Stern PC (2000) Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. Am Psychol 55(5):523–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.523

Stuart AM, Prescott CV, Singleton GR, Joshi RC (2011) Knowledge, attitudes and practices of farmers on rodent pests and their management in the lowlands of the Sierra Madre Biodiversity Corridor, Philippines. Crop Prot 30(2):147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.10.002

Stuecker MF, Tigchelaar M, Kantar MB (2018) Climate variability impacts on rice production in the Philippines. PLoS ONE 13(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201426

Sumarminingsih E (2021) Modeling rainfall using spatial vector autoregressive. Int J Agric Stat Sci 17(1):21–30

Syahrawati M, Martono E, Putra NS, Purwanto BH (2018) Effects of fertilizer, irrigation level and spider presence on abundance of herbivore and carnivore in rice cultivation in Yogyakarta. Asian J Agric Biol6(3):385–395

Szabo S, Apipoonanon C, Pramanik M, Leeson K, Singh DR (2021) Perceptions of an ageing agricultural workforce and farmers’ productivity strategies: evidence from Prachinburi Province, Thailand. Outlook Agric 50(3):294–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270211025053

Tan-Soo J-S, Pattanayak SK (2019) Seeking natural capital projects: forest fires, haze, and early-life exposure in Indonesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116(12):5239–5245. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802876116

Tekken V, Spangenberg JH, Burkhard B, Escalada M, Stoll-Kleemann S, Truong DT, Settele J (2017) “Things are different now”: farmer perceptions of cultural ecosystem services of traditional rice landscapes in Vietnam and the Philippines. Ecosyst Serv 25:153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.010

Templeton DJ, Jamora N (2010) Economic assessment of a change in Pesticide Regulatory Policy in the Philippines. World Dev 38(10):1519–1526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.06.009

Tram LTQ, McPherson M (2016) The ageing and feminization of the agricultural labor force in the lower Mekong Basin [Policy Brief]. Lower Mekong Public Policy Initiative

Trijatmiko KR, Supriyanta, Prasetiyono J, Thomson MJ, Vera Cruz CM, Moeljopawiro S, Pereira A (2014) Meta-analysis of quantitative trait loci for grain yield and component traits under reproductive-stage drought stress in an upland rice population. Mol Breed 34(2):283–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-013-0012-0

Triwidodo H (2020) Brown planthoppers infestations and insecticides use pattern in Java, Indonesia. Agrivita 42(2):320–330. https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v0i0.2501

Tuong TP, Bouman BAM (2003) Rice production in water-scarce environments. In Kijne JW, Barker R, Molden DJ (eds.) Water productivity in agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvement. CABI Publisher

UNDP Philippines (2010) Indigenous peoples in the Philippines [Fast Facts]. United Nations Development Programme, pp. 1–2

UNDRR (2020) Disaster risk reduction in the Republic of Indonesia: status Report 2020 [Status Report 2020]. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

UNDRR & CRED (2020) The Human Cost of Disasters—an overview of the last 20 years 2000–2019—world. ReliefWeb https://reliefweb.int/report/world/human-cost-disasters-overview-last-20-years-2000-2019

Usman M, Sawaya A, Igarashi M, Gayman JJ, Dixit R (2021) Strained agricultural farming under the stress of youths’ career selection tendencies: a case study from Hokkaido (Japan). Humanit Soc Sci Commun 8(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00688-4

Vu Q, Ramal AF, Villegas JM, Jamoralin A, Bernal CC, Pasang JM, Almazan MLP, Ramp D, Settele J, Horgan FG (2018) Enhancing the parasitism of insect herbivores through diversification of habitat in Philippine rice fields. Paddy Water Environ 16(2):379–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-018-0662-y

Waite MB (1915) The importance of research as a means of increasing agricultural production. Ann Am Acad Political Soc Sci 59:40–50

Wakabayashi H, Hongo C, Igarashi T, Asaoka Y, Tjahjono B, Permata I (2021) Flooded rice paddy detection using sentinel-1 and planetscope data: a case study of the 2018 spring flood in West Java, Indonesia. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 14:6291–6301. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3083610

Waltman L (2016) A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. J Informetr 10(2):365–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007

White B, Wijaya H (2021) What kind of labour regime is contract farming? Contracting and sharecropping in Java compared. J Agrar Change https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12459

Widyantari IN, Jamhari, Waluyati LR, Mulyo JH (2018) Does the tribe affect technical efficiency? Case study of local farmer rice farming in Merauke regency, Papua, Indonesia. Int J Mech Eng Technol 9(11):37–47

Widyantari IN, Jamhari, Waluyati LR, Mulyo JH (2019) Case study of farming from transmigrants and local farmers in the district of Semangga and Tanah Miring, Merauke Regency, Papua. Int J Civil Eng Technol 10(2):761–772

Xu W, Virmani SS, Hernandez JE, Sebastian LS, Redoña ED, Li Z (2002) Genetic diversity in the parental lines and heterosis of the tropical rice hybrids. Euphytica 127(1):139–148. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019960625003

Ye J, He C, Liu J, Wang W, Chen S (2017) Left-behind elderly: Shouldering a disproportionate share of production and reproduction in supporting China’s industrial development. J Peasant Stud 44(5):971–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1186651

Yoshida T, Anas, Rosniawaty S, Setiamihardja R (2009) Genetic background of Indonesia rice germplasm and its relationship to agronomic characteristics and eating quality. Jpn J Crop Sci 78(3):335–343. https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.78.335

Yudelman M, Kealy LJM (2000) The graying of farmers. Popul Today 28(4):1–6

Zagata L, Hádková Š, Mikovcová M (2015) Basic outline of the problem of the “ageing population of farmers” in the Czech Republic. Agris On-Line Pap Econ Inform 7(1):89–96. https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2015.070110

Zagata L, Sutherland L-A (2015) Deconstructing the ‘young farmer problem in Europe’: towards a research agenda. J Rural Stud 38:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.01.003

Zapico FL, DIzon JT, Borromeo TH, McNally KL, Fernando ES, Hernandez JE (2020) Genetic erosion in traditional rice agro-ecosystems in Southern Philippines: drivers and consequences. Plant Genet Resour: Charact Util 18(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262119000406

Zenna N, Senthilkumar K, Sie M (2017) Rice production in Africa. In: Chauhan BS, Jabran K, Mahajan G (eds.) Rice production worldwide. Springer International Publishing, pp. 117–135

Zupic I, Čater T (2015) Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ Res Methods 18(3):429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was substantially supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. HKUST 26600521). Partial funding was also made available by the HKUST Institute for Emerging Market Studies with support from EY.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China

Ginbert P. Cuaton & Laurence L. Delina

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

GPC made substantial contributions through this paper’s original conceptualization, data curation and processing, formal analysis, methodology, writing the original draft, and reviewing, revising, and finalizing the paper. LLD made substantial contributions to its conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, and reviewing and editing of the review paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ginbert P. Cuaton .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Additional information.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary info, rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Cuaton, G.P., Delina, L.L. Two decades of rice research in Indonesia and the Philippines: A systematic review and research agenda for the social sciences. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 9 , 372 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01394-z

Download citation

Received : 20 February 2022

Accepted : 30 September 2022

Published : 14 October 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01394-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Literature Review on the Developments of Rice Milling Machines

• Conference paper
• First Online: 12 December 2018
• Cite this conference paper

• M. Sohail Pervez 4 &
• K. S. Zakiuddin 4  

Part of the book series: History of Mechanism and Machine Science ((HMMS,volume 37))

1293 Accesses

The aim of this paper is to present the recent developments in the field of rice milling technology including human powered milling machines. The present paper lucidly explains both traditional and improved methods for the rice milling operation. It speaks about the innovations that took place in dehusking machine from earliest times to the present and its future scope. The different types of designs and progressive developments with operating parameters and mechanisms used can be overviewed from the literature review to obtain out the scope for further developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Araullo EV, De Padua DB, Graham M. Rice Postharvest Technology, International Development Research Centre (IDRC) 053e, Ottawa. ISBN 0-88936-067-7

Google Scholar  

Surendranath Singh TH. Pedal operated rice mill at home scale, manipur science &technology council, Imphal, Manipur

Gariboldi F (1974) Rice milling equipment operation and maintenance. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation, Rome

Satake T (1990) Modern rice milling technology. Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 40–46. By Rickman JF, Gummert M. Agricultural Engineering, International Rice Research Institute IRRI

Wimberly JE (1983) Technical handbook for paddy postharvest industry in developing countries, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Los Banos, Laguna

Van Ruiten HTL (1981) Milling performance of single pass rice mill units using one abrasive roll and one rubber roll instead of two-rubber rolls. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual workshop on grains post harvest technology. Southeast Asia Cooperative Post harvest Research and Development Programme. SEARCA College, Laguna, Philippines

Nayak P (1996) Problems And prospects of rice mill modernization a case study. J. Assam Univ. 1(1):22–28

Esmay M, Eriyanto S, Phillips A (1979) Rice post production technology in the tropics. East-West Food Institute, The University Press of Hawaii, Honululu

Dhankhar P, Hissar T (2014) Rice Milling, IOSR J Eng, 04(05): 34–42 ISSN 2278-8719

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to take this opportunity to express my profound gratitude and deep regard to my PhD supervisor, Professor. K. S. Zakiuddin who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Priyadarshini College of Engineering, Nagpur, 440001, India

M. Sohail Pervez & K. S. Zakiuddin

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. Sohail Pervez or K. S. Zakiuddin .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Institute for the History of Natural Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Baichun Zhang

LARM: Laboratory of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Cassino and South Latium, Cassino, Italy

Marco Ceccarelli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Cite this paper.

Sohail Pervez, M., Zakiuddin, K.S. (2019). Literature Review on the Developments of Rice Milling Machines. In: Zhang, B., Ceccarelli, M. (eds) Explorations in the History and Heritage of Machines and Mechanisms. History of Mechanism and Machine Science, vol 37. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03538-9_8

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03538-9_8

Published : 12 December 2018

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-03537-2

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-03538-9

eBook Packages : Engineering Engineering (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

A Literature Review on Design of Mini Rice Milling Machine

2021, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology

Rice mill is important step in post production of rice, past studies had proven that supply of rice can be increased by additional conversion of paddy to rice through use of modern paddy processing techniques. Aim of this project will be to provide an alternative solution to farmers in form of a portable rice mill machine and decrease dependency on rice mill industries and own a feasible solution for rice milling and own the byproduct obtained from milling process such as bran and husk. A pair to leather roller will be used to remove the husk and mini huller mill will be used for whitening of rice. In this study, we will use conventional method as well as CAD model for designing a portable rice mill machine. Then analysis of design will be performed comparing to study and existing models. After final analysis, when result is found to be safe, design will be finalized.

Related Papers

Uraipan NORES

International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT)

IJERT Journal

https://www.ijert.org/design-development-and-performance-evaluations-of-mini-rice-mill-for-domestic-purpose https://www.ijert.org/research/design-development-and-performance-evaluations-of-mini-rice-mill-for-domestic-purpose-IJERTV3IS100615.pdf In rural areas electric are unavailable or expensive. So performing many activities human muscle power can be good alternative energy requirement. Bicycle is the most efficient mechanical devices developed by man and pedaling is the key to the most efficient use of leg power. Milling is most important aspect of post-harvest operation of paddy. The traditional method of paddy dehulling is laborious, time consuming and low output. So improve milling efficiency mini rice mill for domestic purpose design and developed. The mini rice mill consists of chain drive and gear amplification mechanism that turn huller shaft in housing filled with paddy. In this system is to remove the husk and the brain layers from paddy rice to produce whole white rice kernels. They free the user from rising energy costs, and can be used anywhere, and are easy to maintain, produce no pollution and provide healthy exercise.

Lyceum of the Philippines University Batangas

The main objective of the study is to design and construct a prototype of a rice huller with rice grinder. Experimental research approach is used in this study. It is an attempt by the researcher to maintain control over all factors that may affect the result of an experiment. The researchers had successfully fabricated a prototype of a rice huller than can efficiently husk and bran of the rice using the principle of friction resulting from the rotating motion of the steel roll. A vacuum fan was also installed to suck the remaining light husk at the exhaust of the rice huller. The resulting output from the rice huller with vacuum fan had a husk to rice ratio of less than one cup of husk per 30 cups of rice.

Francis Inegbedion

Nigeria has a history of indigenous rice production with an increasing domestic demand and its prominent role among staple food crops has given it a growing importance. However, there is poor acceptance of local rice in Nigeria due to its processing, which introduces foreign particles and leads to breakage of the rice kernel. Therefore, the authors in this research designed and developed a simple rice mill machine capable of milling 25kg of paddy rice per hour that is safe for human consumption and with minimum breakage of the rice kernels. The developed machine was fabricated using 100% local content. During the testing locally produced and parboiled rice grains were fed through the hopper. The test was carried out by feeding 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000 and 5500 grains into the milling machine at different times. The performance test carried out on the machine was to ascertain if the machine would run and also mill the rice grains at the expected milling capacity of 25kg per hour. The efficiency of the machine was determined by randomly taking some quantity of the milled rice grains and finding the percentage of the milled rice grains, from the total number of rice grains milled. Results revealed that the average efficiency of milling is 85%.

Prof. Nurudeen A . Raji

Shiv Kapoor

— India is an agrarian country. About 70% of Indians are dependent on agriculture for their livelihood. India is one of the world's largest producers of rice, accounting for 20% of all world rice production. Rice is usually grown by planting rice paddy in the fields manually with hands. With this method of planting rice paddy, labour cost increases and it is a very time consuming process. These problems can be solved with the help of rice planting machine. This machine reduces labour cost and time to plant rice paddy. This machine has a simple mechanism and it is eco-friendly. This machine requires only one person for its operation. This machine can bring revolution in rice production. So, the main aim of this to design and develop a rice planting machine which will help the farmers to make the whole rice planting process mechanical resulting in reduction of labour, cost and time to a large extend.

IJARW Research Publication , A. S Bitturwar

Manual method of seed planting, results in low seed placement, spacing efficiencies and serious back pain for the farmer which confines the size of field that can be planted. This study is focus on design and fabrication of a manually operated rice trans-planter for small scale Indian rice cultivators. This machine reduces labour cost and time to plant rice paddy. This machine has a simple mechanism and it is eco-friendly. Manually operated two row paddy transplanter was selected for the study and the male and female subjects selected randomly in the age group of 25-35 years operated it. More force in pulling the transplanter in forward direction is required by the subjects as compared to handle up and handle down operation. The average force required for pulling the transplanter was 130.32 and 145.12 N for male and female subjects, respectively. More force is required for female workers as compared to male workers because of males are taller and thus exerted a more upward-oriented force on the unit thus reducing the drag force on the runners. These problems can be solved with the help of proposed new design paddy planting machine. This proposed machine reduces labor cost and time to plant paddy. This machine has a simple mechanism and it is eco-friendly. This machine requires only a single person for its operation and working. This machine can bring revolution in rice production in our scenario. So, the main aim of this proposed work to design and develop a paddy planting machine which will help the farmers to make the whole paddy planting process mechanical resulting in reduction of labor, cost and time to a large extend. Presently the process is tedious, time consuming and health hazardous. After studying various available machines, the final machine had finalized considering all factors. The complete modelling, drafting, assembly and design of machine are done using CAD software AUTOCAD, CREO and CATIA. The model is prepared and analyzed for synchronous and fault free motion of components. Time study of the manual process was performed at the farm. On the basis of rate of plantation and cost of labour, the fabrication process, material and maximum cost of production were planned out. The material chosen considering weight and easy to maintain. The analysis of existing machine has been performed thoroughly.

Anang Saleh

The aim of this research to develop a simple rice seedling transplanter with a crank system for two lines, the manufacturing costs are cheap and affordable, ergonomic, lighter and easy maintanance. Agricultural activities are mostly found in rural areas and many land conditions are divided into small plots, making it difficult to implement mechanized machinery, especially planting machines of the field rice seedlings, this causes farmers to be reluctant to use these machines in addition to expensive prices. Expectations of the results of this study can motivate farmers to implement rice seedlings planting tools that begin with simple technology and can overcome the scarcity of planters so as to support the food security program. The design approach is based on a functional design and structural design. The stages of designing this machine include problem identification, formulation and refinement of ideas, selection of draft concepts, analysis and creation of working drawings, manuf...

TJPRC Publication

The machine consists of blower unit, heating unit, container, casing, wooden platform and power consumption. Two types of power transmission was used in the developed machine, one from electric motor of 0.25 hp capacity for blower and the other one for heating coil connected directly to electric source. After achieving 220-250 o C temperature in the container, the specified feed rate of conditioned rice in to the container will result in puffed rice within a short span of around 10-12 sec. The capacity of the small scale rice puffing machine ranges between 4-5 kg/h.

Journal 4 Research - J4R Journal

J4R - Journal for Research , Patel Mayurkumar Ravjibhai

Need of rice transplanting machine is growing nowadays because of unique feature seeding in well sequence and well manners. This will save too much efforts of human being. Class of people who uses this kind of machine is farmers and they are having poor economic background. To feed growing population is a huge challenge. Importation of rice will lead to drain out the economy of the country. Mechanization of paddy sector will lead to higher productivity with releasing of work force to other sectors. The objective of this project is to design a paddy transplanting mechanism to transplant paddy seedling by small scale farmers in the country. Hence, this is considered as an activity that needed mechanization. For mechanization the modeling and simulation evaluated for hand operated rice seeding machine, which is help the farmers to planting more and more amount of rice in good quality with low energy consumption and less harm to the environment. India is predominately an agricultural country with rice as one of its main food crop. It Produce about 80 million tons rice annually which is about 22% of the world rice production. Culturally transplanting of young seeding is preferred over direct seeding for better yield and better crop management practice. But this operation requires large amount of manpower (about 400 Man-Hour/ha) and task is very laborious involving working in stopping posture and moving in muddy field.

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024