Prague
Data collection took place in two stages. First, the principal investigator conducted a thorough literature review and prepared a singular interview guide protocol that has been devised into five sections totalling fourteen basic questions. Every part of the interview included probing questions as a “jumping off” point for topic discussions, enabling the interviewer to explore different matters and dissimilar strategic approaches towards talent management. Interviewers sought to understand: (i) how different coworking spaces are perceiving the human talent; (ii) how the identity of a particular coworking space is being built to attract a specific type of individual; (iii) how coworking spaces are mapping skills and how are these skills being connected into skillsets; (iv) what specific mechanisms are being used to attract and retain skilled individuals; and finally (v) how the selected coworking spaces are strategically approaching the possible establishment of talent pools and the ultimate utilisation of mapped talents for inner and outer sourcing.
Next, 20 interviews with general managers were conducted on location at selected coworking spaces by four regional scholars. All of the discussions were undertaken in the local languages, since the ability of the respondent to express themselves and comprehend the interview in their mother tongue is essential to conducting research that is both rigorous and culturally competent (Fryer 2019 ). Discussions were recorded and transcribed by the interviewers, with transcripts subsequently being translated into English for analysis and comparison of the data. The total length of the recorded interviews was 1,225 min, with the average conversation lasting 61.25 min. There were no disagreements between the scholars who have collected the data.
The translated transcripts were returned to the principal investigator for analysis. Since the data collected was complex and texturally rich, the examination was conducted using template data analysis, a methodology of thematic analysis that involves a high degree of structure. The centre of this technique is developing a coding template in the form of a conceptual framework (King 1998 ). Several examples from prior workspace studies utilising this approach (e.g., Phipps et al. 2009 ; Viotti 2016 ; Morrison and Smollan 2020 ) emphasise a hierarchical coding, encompass narrower and more specific themes, and utilise a clear overview of relevant findings that elucidate previously unexplored fields (Table (Table2 2 ).
Main Theme | Sub-Theme | Features |
---|---|---|
Community | Community vs. Business Focus | |
Atmosphere / Feel | ||
Long-Term Collaboration | ||
Community for Marketing Purposes | ||
Brand and Community Identification | ||
Brand Identity | Physical Space as Part of the Brand Identity | |
Fitting the Cowork into the Local | ||
Definition of Talent | ||
Space Organization | Inspiration | |
Founder/Owner | ||
CWS Team | ||
Member/Information Exchange among Spaces | ||
Communication Platforms | ||
Physical Space | ||
Talent Attraction Mechanisms | Publicity | |
Events as Talent Attraction Tools | ||
Talent Selection Mechanisms | Selection Criteria | |
Community as Self-Selection Mechanism | ||
Pricing Strategies | ||
Talent Development and Retention | Mentors/Coaches/Experts | |
Resource Provision | ||
Forms of Incubation/Acceleration | ||
Awareness of Members’ Needs | ||
Member-Led Talent Development | ||
Events as Talent Development and Retention Tools | ||
Talent Mediation Mechanisms | Talent Management Tools |
|
Events as Community Building Tools | ||
Community as Talent Mediation Mechanism | ||
Informal Mediation Mechanisms | ||
Sourcing of Talent by Externals and Members | Investors/Incubators/Accelerators | |
“Outgrowing” Clients |
The transcripts were read multiple times by three researchers, who independently identified key themes of the interviews with the coworking space managers. The key themes were subsequently discussed and continuously challenged by the researchers during weekly meetings, from which a total of eight main themes emerged: community, brand identity, talent attraction mechanisms, talent selection mechanisms, talent development and retention mechanisms, talent mediation mechanisms, space organization, sourcing of talent by externals and members. Upon further discussion, the themes were synthesized into a working model, which was further refined upon completion of the coding process, and focused solely on themes and sub-themes which were cited in at least ten of the interviews. In taking this approach, the final version of the model was re-validated through a final round of discussion by challenging the model against transcripts to determine fit.
The respondents allude to a focus on providing a framework for the functioning of the community of their members. They note that shared values among users, and generally accepted rules for interaction, enable them to co-create a sense of community. The interviews suggest that coworking spaces can be positioned along a “Community vs. Business Focus” continuum, with a primary focus either on community building to foster collaboration of members and enhance well-being, or on growing the coworking space through rapid expansions, both locally and internationally. The interviews shed light upon the goal of community-focused workspaces, namely, the growth of one’s own enterprise by and through the community’s organic growth. The following quote illustrates this further:
“ So, the aim is not only to move our business forward but also to move their business forward and to enrich one another, and all in all to move forward.” (HubHub Prague) .
In addition to the focus on either the community or the business, there are degrees of attention to the wider (local) Community evident in the pursuit of supporting “ positive social change” (ImpactHub Budapest). Coworking spaces perceive themselves as initiators and accelerators of movements and broader communities, either focusing on a specific theme such as entrepreneurship, or on a more comprehensive mission such as environmental impact or social justice. In particular, those spaces operating as subsidiaries of a larger enterprise (e.g., HubHub under HB Reavis; Brain Embassy under Adger) seem to naturally lean towards the Business Focus side of the continuum. These workspaces face more pressure to generate returns through the growth of their clients’ businesses, often to refer clients to the parent company, from which the clients can lease office space. In contrast to the business focus, workspaces on the Community Focus side of the continuum treat the building of community as “ the most important thing ” (Kubik Budapest). These spaces encourage personal growth, and advocate collaboration among members to create a tight-knit community that shares values and interacts on a meaningful basis. Business growth may be part of the plan, but it is not necessarily a driving force.
The Atmosphere / Feel within the coworking space emerged as a significant sub-theme. The operators are keenly aware of its importance: “ Thanks to the creation of a friendly atmosphere here…. We are trying to find ways how we can activate the people here. So that they could experience this synergy” (Noa Co-work Warsaw). In trying to create a setting that cultivates productivity and familiarity, members seem to soak up the atmosphere, leading to boosts of motivation and synergies among members. This is furthered by the focus on Long-term Collaboration between members and the workspace, with the spaces investing in the relationship with their members by supporting them throughout their business life cycle.
What results from this process is a feeling of organisational citizenship, where individuals can learn and businesses can thrive. This even extends to former members, or “ alumni ” (Kaptar Budapest) who return to the space for special events. Establishing such a community makes it possible for the spaces to utilize the Community for Marketing Purposes, as word spreads and the space organically gains new members who are interested in becoming part of the ecosystem: “ And because everything we offer is available to all members, the community then interconnects organically, the community sparks interest internally but also externally, I mean that people’s interest in what happens here grows.” (WeWork Prague). This mechanism is further reinforced by the members’ Brand and Community Identification , with the feeling of pride that comes with a sense of belonging to relevant target groups. The following quote illustrates this effect in place at HubHub in Bratislava:
“It means that when I introduce somebody to someone else, they say “this is a HubHub member” and I identify myself as a member of a group. The objective is to make that group strong and prestigious so that people want to belong to it; that it's going to be a quality sign, a sign that you qualify somewhere.”
A space’s brand identity emerged from the interviews as a key element in positioning the coworking space in the market and attracting talent. By developing and further advancing their own DNA, and actively communicating this through public relations efforts, workspaces can differentiate themselves in the local market, with a focus on their global standing. Similarly, the spaces establish the Physical Space as Part of the Brand Identity , opting for a unique interior which also becomes advantageous for members looking to impress guests that they invite to the space, as outlined by Brain Embassy in Warsaw:
“They also said that the membership here influences business relationships in a very positive way. You have a client who is entering this space and there is something to talk about at the very first instance. There is nothing like “how was your trip”, but rather “wow!” as a reaction to the place. Brainers [name for their members] tell us that it has a very positive influence on the quality of these meetings.”
Moreover, the physical space aids the functioning of the brand identity in attracting their target group. For the latter, the sub-theme of Fitting the Cowork into the Local emerged, which further outlines how the space is configured to the local needs and market dynamics. Despite a centralized strategy of larger coworking space operators, they nevertheless suggest an adaptation based on the given local context. SvetHub in Prague explains it in this way:
“We are a small coworking space, that is distinct … how to say this, it’s based on people who live close by, they’ve been coming here for a long time, it’s not any in-and-out sort of place. People have been members for at least a year, they tend to be members for months or years at a time, it’s usually for more than half a year.”
To more effectively draw their target group into the space, the brand identity seems to be built around a Definition of Talent of their ideal members. This ranges from an emphasis on hard skills to a softer understanding of talent as innate by looking primarily for “somebody with talent” (HubHub Bratislava). A key criterion appears to be the Value added to the Community , which comprises both soft and hard factors. The following quote exemplifies this:
“The profile of the “dream” client is a person who is open. It is someone who likes to talk about their business, likes to build relationships, is happy to cooperate, so cares about this space, feels engaged here. Although it is us who are supposed to provide services and service here…. this feeling of comm…..of belonging…” (Noa Co-work Warsaw).
Following the coworking space’s conscious positioning in the local talent market and narrowing down the requirements for members, the goal is to fill the space with the most suitable members. With an initial membership base, the space solidifies its market position, allowing for an organic, non-mediated attraction of talent as new members fitting the profile are drawn into the space:
“When you have an attractive tech company, other tech companies follow, and hiring, I don’t want to use this word because we don’t do hiring, but I mean that it becomes easier to attract top tech companies, they start responding when they find out you are already developing a tech community and you already have some tech startups.” (HubHub Prague).
This is further aided by active Publicity through engagement on social media channels, investment in SEO and Adwords, while also relying on organically generated word of mouth of members attracting further candidates from the desired target group. In addition to this, Events as Talent Attraction Tools function by opening the space to the general public, enabling guests to engage with members. The respondents stress this as perhaps the most critical tool to generate new members, suggesting an inevitable return on investment whereby, in addition to enlarging the membership base, networking further contributes to the development and growth of current members:
“Actually, we are able to convert people who take part at an event to our (wide) community, to our clients or connect them to someone within our community. The events can be the biggest channel I would say, it’s quite important.” (Campus City Bratislava).
With a focus on full occupancy of the space, coworking spaces actively assess candidates in line with the respective policies and strategies of the space to determine their fit, both in terms of the community and the prospective member’s skill set, as highlighted in the following quote:
“The goal at the end of the day is that when we are fully occupied and will be able to choose who will be here, that the candidates will have to qualify.” (HubHub Bratislava).
For assessment purposes, the sub-theme of Selection Criteria emerged, which, in line with the underlying understanding of talent within the space, narrows down the profile of the ideal member to be selected by the staff member in charge, for instance, based upon specific personality traits:
“It is more of intuition. I can feel if someone has a natural personal culture, conduct…. Or not… If I have more people who apply for the space here… I actually use such personal criteria. Some people call it “chemistry”. This chemistry usually grows in personal relationship but there is an assumption here that in Noa co-work we also work on more familiar basis.” (Noa Co-work Warsaw).
Furthermore, respondents hint at the Community as a Self-Selection Mechanism . Hence, a non-mediated process, where prospective members get to develop a feeling for the space’s atmosphere and members either during an event, or while making use of a free trial day. When that sense of synergy is lacking, they de-select and no longer wish to become members:
“And somehow, those who don’t share our approach go away, and it happens organically, which I like. I think that in the course of our existence we decided to say good-bye to two members. And usually, the people who go away don’t share our mindset, they don’t enjoy the relaxed, pleasant and friendly space, they prefer to be on formal terms, they prefer an enclosed office and a hotel-like services that we don’t provide. They leave because they might be dissatisfied, the place is not a good fit for them and that’s completely fine, because we can’t accommodate everyone and we have some boundaries that we can cross and that we can’t cross.” (ImpactHub Prague).
The third selection parameter is the pursuit of Pricing Strategies , in particular setting prices in higher market segments, with which the coworking spaces further narrow down their target group to individuals, small teams, or other businesses with stable growth and income, and in doing so, turn away candidates with less financial stability: “ Please also remember that the price, the fee does the job. We do not have the whole spectrum of the society.” (WeWork Warsaw).
The respondents outline how coworking spaces assume “the role of an educator, of a change maker” (Brain Embassy Warsaw) for their members in helping them advance both in terms of their personal growth, as well as their businesses. By making use of internal and external Mentors/Coaches/Experts , the coworking spaces actively develop their members in a mediated process:
“We have a database of mentors. So, when he [the business] comes to me and says “We have grown up and we need help with financial matters”, I will say that OK, here is the CFO of Microsoft, I can connect you. Thus, top people in the country to whom they would never get a chance to get, these people teach or convey their knowledge, and for them it is again that HubHub forms a gateway—they know that when we link them to someone, it is not going to be just anybody from the street who wants something and a there is a filter in place.” (HubHub Bratislava).
To further enable the development and retention of members, Resource Provision is considered a necessity to allow members to focus on developing their potential fully. Such resources range from basic amenities such as high-speed internet and coffee, to more customized service offerings:
“It sounds ridiculous but it’s basics, and if this doesn’t work well, everything else we’re trying to build falls to pieces.” (ImpactHub Prague).
An additional approach taken in the development of members is the establishment of Forms of Incubation/Acceleration within the coworking spaces, supporting individuals and businesses in various stages of their business life cycle. This, in turn, also benefits the coworking spaces through the expansion of their network and draws interest from investors. In the pursuit of maximizing the benefits from talent development and retention mechanisms, Awareness of Members’ Needs is described as a crucial element and a continuous effort to tailor their offerings to the changing needs of their members. The following quote highlights this point:
“Every company has needs. You can have a first impression that there is a marketing agency that is doing very well but after a conversation like this it turns out there are some problems that they have not addressed, and that we can actually help them. This is, in fact, the source of our activity.” (HubHub Warsaw).
For this purpose, a variety of Tools to Investigate Members’ Needs are utilized, ranging from surveys to feedback meetings or less formal chats. In addition to the space’s own development efforts, Member-Led Talent Development functions through community initiatives by members, for members, and is actively encouraged by the coworking space. These may also take the form of Events as Talent Development and Retention Tools, either covering a specific, business-related topic, or other inspirational topics. These events are offered free of charge to members, who also get the opportunity to interact with fellow members, or network with guests who pay to join the events:
“And because everything we offer is available to all members, the community then interconnects organically, the community sparks interest internally but also externally, I mean that people’s interest in what happens here grows. Well at least three times a week, we host an event for all our members. And because we don’t rent out our space externally, this is also an added value for the people who sit here because they organize their own events or presentations here. And when, for instance, our startup decides to have a presentation here, the whole building can attend. So, they become known to the community and once they are known to the community, somehow organically the information is passed on.” (WeWork Prague).
The combination of these mechanisms allows coworking spaces to develop their members, and in doing so, ensure the retention of talent.
Another way that workspaces actively develop members is through the use of talent mediation mechanisms. As coworking space members make connections with each other, they find new opportunities for personal and professional growth. In the words of an analogy shared by HubHub Warsaw, “ We like to give the fishing rod, not the fish. We try to connect people; we try to help them take advantage of one another’s skills”.
This process is aided by the use of Talent Management Tools . These entail selective invitations for External Talent to connect with members. Some spaces also report that they are being directly contacted by external parties looking to engage. Talent Pools/Systems are provided as a digital tool, where members create profiles and search through the member database. By filtering for skills, location, interests and the like, meaningful relationships can be built even across locations and countries. This directly feeds into the functioning of Community as Talent Mediation Mechanism, with the active exchange of ideas. Ideally, this results in collaboration among members, as illustrated by Noa Co-work in Warsaw:
“There are also some “higher level” things such as interactions …. For example, since this open space is a shared space, people get to know one another in different constellations. Sometimes their professions are complementary and they can start some cooperation. For example, a designer with a software developer can create projects together. It is the most common example. But also, the professions that are similar take advantage of sharing things in common here. They have similar problems; they can consult each other. So, it is a nice value added, apart from using this space. They can even consult their ideas with other people.”
This is portrayed as flourishing further with (Professional) Diversity Leading to Personal Understanding among members from different backgrounds. The final aspect in creating the necessary framework for effective talent mediation consists of Informal Mediation Mechanisms where coworking space staff actively contribute to creating a friendly, open environment with informal interactions among members, nudging them to connect with others:
“Maybe just a small percentage of people who are outgoing, open, will start talking to others in the street…. But really it is just a small percentage of such people… majority of people need support. I come here: “Hi”, “hi”.. “what’s up?” With this approach I open other people …. They notice that there is somebody else next to them … that a conversation can be interesting… that even when you have a small talk something can happen later on… it is really hard work, the work of community teams, you know…” (Brain Embassy Warsaw).
A second key element within the space is its organization, both from an operational perspective and from a strategic/visionary perspective. To enhance the functioning of the space, the operators look for Inspiration by travelling to other coworking spaces or meeting with community managers from other spaces, as described by Kubik Budapest:
“I used to do a lot of overseas viewing of what they do, how they do it. I've just been to Tel Aviv, and there was a WeWork, I went to look around, very designer offices, I've collected a lot of ideas from them before, but it's getting harder to figure out what's new.”
The Founder/Owner exerts a strong influence over the shape of the coworking space, fashioning it in line with their personal ideals and needs, as noted by the co-founder and current owner of SvetHub Prague:
“So, I designed this space so I myself could use it, and the design is built on my own needs and it reflects my personality that likes to connect these diverse sectors.”
To better run the space, the owners hire a Coworking Space Team (CWS Team) with similar values to nurture the community and its atmosphere. Both members and coworking space operators benefit from Member/Information Exchange among Spaces , where members can use multiple locations of the larger coworking chain, and coworking space operators may also exchange knowledge with non-related spaces. Such exchanges are made possible by the spaces’ self-perception not as competitors, but as part of a larger ecosystem of local, independent centres who “complement one another rather than compete with one another” (Noa Co-work Warsaw). Other space organization elements include the use of Communication Platforms for members to engage one another. These tend to be digital platforms, such as Slack or Facebook, but can also be internal systems specifically designed for the space. Lastly, the Physical Space is consciously created with amenities such as kitchenettes, which are described as “the heart of the central point of the space” (HubHub Prague). These areas provide a general Spatial Layout to Foster Community-Building, so that members can chat informally and bond with others. Some spaces even allow for (Member-based) Changes in Spatial Layout to enhance the fit of the physical space to their members’ needs.
As coworking spaces attract and develop a base of talented members, they draw interest from companies within the broader business environment who seek to contract with some of the members. Similarly, members themselves leverage the coworking space as a talent pool to acquire new employees. One group which actively attempts to source talent from coworking spaces is made up of Investors/Incubators/Accelerators . Some of the respondents describe how they cultivate these sorts of relationships to forward them potentially interesting candidates, such as HubHub Bratislava:
“We try to provide a flexible space and events that can be developmental, also a network of contacts and introducing them to people – their future business partners, investors or mentors.”
A more direct benefit of solid talent management of coworking spaces can be observed in the case of ImpactHub Prague, reporting to be approached by externals asking for contacts to fill certain positions, highlighting how building a strong talent pool has built the coworking space’s reputation in the business environment. However, the interviewee reports to be protective of the community by not disclosing information directly, and instead giving the choice to members through the approach towards externals outlined below, thus also benefitting members by providing them with new development opportunities:
“ ...send me info about what you’re looking for, and a short piece introducing your company, so that I know who’s asking, and I’ll share it with the people I think might be interested and they would potentially get back to you ”
With talent management measures in place, a common strategy has emerged for members’ connection to externals, resulting in “Outgrowing Clients”, and thus, in businesses that outgrow the coworking space. In particular, those spaces operating under a larger office space provider (e.g., Business Link under SKANSKA), are able to feed the newly matured business back to the parent company, which can accommodate its growing needs, as explained below:
“If you have a very large enterprise like American Express for example or a large bank. They will certainly aim to have permanent outlets, locations. If they start with us, they will be, in the end, interested in traditional leasing (of office area). Our “marriage” with SKANSKA can secure this as well, as part of our capital group. We can offer some office space for their beginning but later SKANSKA will meet their further demands.” (Business Link Warsaw). (Fig. (Fig.1 1 ) Open in a separate window Fig. 1 Model 1. Human talent cycle in coworking environments
The findings discussed in this paper lay out a comprehensive model for the functioning of talent mechanisms in coworking spaces. This model consists of four major elements.
First, the conscious building of a strong brand identity for the coworking space is a prerequisite for subsequent talent mechanisms to take effect. Importantly, with its underlying concept of talent specific to the space, the brand identity helps to determine the ultimate effectiveness of talent recruitment efforts by reinforcing the space’s connection to the target group of highly skilled workers in that location. Moreover, the relationship between brand identity and talent attraction mechanisms may be understood as reciprocal, with the brand benefitting from, and being strengthened by, the community of increasingly talented members.
With talent attraction mechanisms as the initiator, the interviews depict a human resource cycle that entails selection, development, and retention efforts by the coworking space. Because this second element is cyclical in nature, it is best understood as an ongoing process which gradually allows a space to maximize its efficacy. Once the space has reached a “critical mass” of talented members, its operators can become more particular in their selection criteria for potential new members. Conversely, they may also begin to de-select underperforming members based on continuous performance reviews as observed in some cases. Furthermore, as talent development and retention efforts become more customized, brand identity is enhanced, and external talent begins to view membership as something they should aspire to. In essence, talent attraction begins to take on a life of its own, and these mechanisms’ functioning improves over time.
Nevertheless, to optimize the effective functioning of this human resource cycle, the space’s organisation and the talent mediation play a crucial role. This third element provides the operational framework to allow for any of the mechanisms to be employed, including that of the physical environment itself, to best cater to its members’ varied and changing needs. Talent mediation within the space fuels the effective functioning of talent mechanisms by interlacing members, in both mediated and non-mediated approaches, to build community and enable members to take advantage of any synergies the shared workspace offers.
The fourth and final element of the conceptual model is the continuous sourcing of talent, both by businesses within the space who hire new employees or contract with other members and external businesses who recruit from the co-located talent pool. This is where coworking spaces are able to reap the benefits of the financial and non-financial investments they have made in the functioning and continuous improvement of the human resource cycle. From the perspective of workspace users, this is where their career and business growth are helped most clearly.
The empirical evidence from different coworking spaces is relevant to research on high-performance work systems, and contributes to the study of talent management in relation to coworking environments and their role in labour markets. First, the results have shown that coworking spaces identify themselves as local accelerators of entrepreneurship within communities, contributing to positive social change in their local environments. By facilitating interaction and collaboration between users, coworking spaces offer support throughout the business life cycle, with various lifelong learning and professional growth tools.
Second, the evidence suggests that coworking spaces consciously work to build brand identification and a sense of belonging. The latter stands as the hallmark of an entrepreneurial environment, where individuals can hone their skills and acquire knowledge. Coworking spaces thus become identified as hubs of highly skilled talent by local businesses and policymakers.
Third, in order to realise their potential as talent pools, coworking spaces construct and adapt a vast array of talent attraction, selection and retention mechanisms. The evidence indicates that these mechanisms are different in every workspace, and are generally part of the strategic framework that establishes the position of a coworking space on a local market. Nevertheless, some similarities between the said mechanisms can be identified as they all build their basis on first identifying the talent, recognising the compatibility of the prosperous users and being invested into building meaningful relationships between onboarded users.
This paper can help raise awareness of policymakers about the importance of understanding coworking spaces as contemporary entrepreneurial hubs and help them formulate relevant policies supporting these flexible work environments. Moreover, the industry can better understand how different types of coworking spaces operate in terms of HRM, and how they position themselves in the changing landscape of a flexible economy that demands a supply of highly skilled individuals. For practitioners, the outlined talent mechanisms offer an opportunity to be seized. However, they might also be viewed as a threat, pushing them to adopt defensive measures for retaining talent in the face of highly developed coworking competitors. Overall, taking a strategic approach to talent management may benefit coworking spaces, especially in the long-term, due to the nature of the human resources cycle in continuously improving further by enhancing subsequent mechanisms (e.g., successful development and retention improving the brand identity as perceived by potential new members, thus contributing further to attraction mechanisms).
Due to the current COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting shutdown of commerce in many countries during the first half of 2020, the open talent economy has been significantly disrupted. Both traditional and flexible workplaces have been transformed, with the need for social distancing eclipsing the sort of openness and interaction between workplace users previously promoted. Nevertheless, while the coworking industry has been hit particularly hard by the pandemic, coworking environments may yet re-emerge as places offering the sort of flexibility that will be perceived as an asset to local economies. Bureau à Partager, the main platform for connecting individuals and organisations with drop-in workspaces in France, suggests that coworking environments will play a significant role in restarting the flexible economy (Calders 2020 ). JLL, a commercial real estate service provider has gone a step further, positing that the coworking model will likely take a larger share of the global office market, thanks to its resilience and ability to adapt to the needs of the economy (Huwart 2020 ). Future development and the changing landscape for flexible workspaces will demand additional research to further delineate the role of coworking environments in human resource management.
There are two possible outcomes to consider in terms of (re)establishing talent pools within coworking environments in the post-COVID-19 world. First, coworking spaces situate their users within a supportive network that is strongly connected to the physical environment. While most of the premises have closed their doors in the opening months of the crisis due to the need for physical distancing, many coworking spaces have initiated virtual coworking sessions for their members in order to maintain connections and nurture a sense of community and belonging (Roussel 2020 ). Efficient moderation of community-based activities and mediation of relationships might prove to be a go-to tool for retaining individuals within relevant networks. However, the COVID-19 pandemic could change that and a more personalised approach will be needed to attract the very same individuals back to coworking spaces.
Second, early coworking spaces underwent a sort of “growth spurt” following the global economic crisis of 2008 and 2009, with self-employed individuals and independent workers showing a demand for flexible workspaces with access to collaborative networks and new business opportunities. Assuming that coworking spaces can retain their position as talent pools, attract new skilled individuals, and effectively utilise mediation mechanisms that promote connectivity between individual members and companies, they could become a focal point for reigniting local economies.
Having said that, an additional scholarly inquiry will be needed. First, it will be essential to understand how smaller, localised and independent coworking spaces may reintroduce the gatekeeping process of selecting individuals who would befit their internal networks of support. Second, with markets being reshaped due to the Covid-19 disruption, coworking spaces may focus on a particular field of knowledge and a specific set of skills and subsequently attract such talent. Third, in parallel to onsite coworking spaces, these spaces may start to actively develop their digital presence, posing the question of how virtual coworking spaces attract individuals and effectively connect them in networks of support.
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Marko Orel, Email: [email protected] .
Manuel Mayerhoffer, Email: zc.esv@30myam .
Jana Fratricova, Email: [email protected] .
Anna Pilkova, Email: [email protected] .
Marzena Starnawska, Email: ude.wu.zw@akswanratSM .
Dora Horvath, Email: [email protected] .
F.S. Jubitana
Publication.
Just another place to work, or promising hubs for knowledge creation?
Within recent years an increasing amount of knowledge workers that are (mostly) active in the field of the creative industries and new media have been starting to make use of shared urban office environments known as coworking spaces. While essentially these coworking spaces can simply be conceived of as places where urban knowledge workers can rent a desk and work alongside each other, these environments are increasingly being associated with high expectations concerning the future of knowledge work as they intend to foster interactive dynamics among individual and local communities of entrepreneurs, freelancers and startups that make use of these spaces. The local concentration of these knowledge workers within coworking spaces has in particularly been suggested to be beneficial for knowledge creation, which involves the process by which new ideas, products and services are being developed, given that coworking spaces facilitate the physical platforms for these knowledge workers to identify new opportunities through networking practices, which consequently could lead to knowledge creation through the combination of the skills and talents of these coworkers. As a result of these assumed benefits for knowledge creation, coworking spaces have been conceptualized as microclusters in analogy to clusters which can be understood as “geographic concentrations of interconnected companies, specialized suppliers, service providers, firms from related industries, and associated institutions”, and which facilitate similar knowledge dynamics albeit on a different scale. Evidence of such dynamics however appeared to be lacking, which is why scholars started to cast their doubts on whether coworking spaces can actually redeem their promise of becoming promising platforms for knowledge creation. Moreover, despite that previous studies provided some useful indications of factors that could provoke knowledge creation dynamics among coworkers, none of these studies qualitatively assessed which of these factors are actually considered effective by the main actors related to coworking spaces. In order to address this gap in the literature, a qualitative inquiry by the means of eleven in-depth interviews was conducted with both coworkers and staff related to the management of seven Amsterdam-based coworking spaces, in order to find an answer to the following research question: “How can coworking spaces effectively foster knowledge creation?” Cluster theory was first consulted in order to assess whether similar factors are of influence on knowledge creation dynamics within coworking spaces as the conceptualization of these environments as microclusters seems to suggest. The results of the thematic data analysis indicated four main factors that were considered as effective in their ability to foster knowledge creation dynamics within coworking spaces: Selection, Connecting, Interactive Design and Educating. The relevance of these factors however seemed to differ between coworking spaces that were either larger, or smaller in terms of size and populations. Consequently, these differences make it questionable whether the microcluster conceptualization of coworking spaces will remain sustainable as it only seems to cover one particular configuration of coworking.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
Keywords | media, business, Coworking Spaces, Knowledge Creation, Creative Knowledge Workers, Clusters, Microclusters. |
Thesis Advisor | H.J.C.J. Hitters, J.M. Engelbert |
Persistent URL | |
Series | |
Organisation | |
Citation | . . Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2105/40361 |
A new building in Fort Greene was designed to encourage a more intimate living space, according to the builders.
By Matt Yan
Matt Yan reported in a white hard hat from the construction site, where the building is slated to be completed at the beginning of next year.
At the intersection of Myrtle and Vanderbilt Avenues in Brooklyn, a restaurant and fish market sit on one side of Myrtle, while townhouses and an apartment building line Vanderbilt. Some of these buildings are made from brick, and most are neutral toned. But at the corner, one building is an outlier: It’s pink.
That pink building — on the site of a former gas station at 144 Vanderbilt Avenue in Fort Greene — is slated to be completed at the beginning of next year. The building’s rippled edges, stacked silhouette and varying height stand out in stark contrast to anything else nearby. Tankhouse , a Brooklyn-based developer, collaborated on the project, to be known as 144 Vanderbilt, with SO-IL , an architecture firm, and Ted Kane, the project’s architect of record. Alex Schwartz, the president of ABS Engineering, was the MEP engineer on the project.
Sam Alison-Mayne and Sebastian Mendez, the owners of Tankhouse, are aware of the reputation that developers have: They go into a neighborhood, build something and then leave. That’s why, Mr. Alison-Mayne said, they try to build in familiar neighborhoods, like their own. He lives nearby on Willoughby Avenue, and Mr. Mendez lives in Gowanus.
“It’s really tempting to think that you can develop anywhere,” said Mr. Mendez, who founded Tankhouse in 2013 with Mr. Alison-Mayne. “I think it’s a little difficult because you just don’t know where you are. You don’t know what’s going on, and you don’t know what the issues are.”
Their familiarity with the area extends to some members of the project’s team, most of whom live nearby. (The architects from SO-IL live on Adelphi Street, two streets over.)
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
The theses in UWSpace are publicly accessible unless restricted due to publication or patent pending.
This collection includes a subset of theses submitted by graduates of the University of Waterloo as a partial requirement of a degree program at the Master's or PhD level. It includes all electronically submitted theses. (Electronic submission was optional from 1996 through 2006. Electronic submission became the default submission format in October 2006.)
This collection also includes a subset of UW theses that were scanned through the Theses Canada program. (The subset includes UW PhD theses from 1998 - 2002.)
Entrepreneur Becky Litvintchouk works on her computer at a co-working space on Monday, Aug. 12, 2024, in New York. (AP Photo/Andres Kudacki)
Entrepreneur Becky Litvintchouk makes a call at a co-working space on Monday, Aug. 12, 2024, in New York. (AP Photo/Andres Kudacki)
Becky Litvintchouk didn’t think she’d be able to manage the mountain of tasks needed to become an entrepreneur. Every other part of her life has been overwhelming because of ADHD , which can impact her ability to concentrate.
So, she turned to AI. The app Claude helps her decide which contracts made the most sense for her hygienic-wipes business, GetDirty, without having to read them word for word. She also created business plans by telling the generative AI bot what her goals were and having it create steps for her to get there.
“It’s been just massively instrumental. I probably would not be where I am today,” she said of using AI for about two years.
Experts say generative AI tools can help people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder — who experience difficulties with focusing, organizing and controlling impulses — to get through tasks quicker. But they also caution that it shouldn’t replace traditional treatment for ADHD, and also expressed concerns about potential overreliance and invasion of privacy.
Emily Kircher-Morris, a counselor who focuses on neurodivergent patients, said she’s seen the tools be useful to her clients with ADHD. She even uses them herself since she has ADHD.
Her clients, she said, seem to have varying levels of comfort with the idea of using AI. But for those who take to the technology, “it really can help to hook people in, like, ‘Oh, this is kind of a fancy new thing that catches my interest. And so I really want to dig in and explore it.’”
This article is part of AP’s Be Well coverage, focusing on wellness, fitness, diet and mental health. Read more Be Well.
She also said it’s good to use caution. John Mitchell, an associate professor at Duke University School of Medicine, added that AI apps should be used more as “one tool in a toolbox” instead of replacing traditional treatments such as developing organizational skills or taking prescription medications.
“If you’re kind of treading water in your job and AI’s a life preserver, well, that’s great you’re staying above water, but, you know, you still don’t know how to swim,” he said.
Litvintchouk, a married mother of four living in New York City, dropped out of high school and left the workforce — all things that research shows are more likely to happen to people with ADHD, putting them at higher risk of economic instability.
Aside from helping with her business, she uses ChatGPT to help with grocery shopping — another thing that can be fraught for people with ADHD because of the organization and planning skills needed — by having it brainstorm easy-to-prepare recipes with a corresponding grocery list.
When she shared her technique with another mom who also has ADHD, she felt more people needed to know about it, so she started creating videos on TikTok about various AI tools she uses to help manage her ADHD struggles.
“That’s when I was like, you know what? I need to, like, educate people,” she said.
Generative AI tools can help people with ADHD break down big tasks into smaller, more manageable steps. Chatbots can offer specific advice and can sound like you’re talking with a human. Some AI apps can also help with reminders and productivity.
Software engineer Bram de Buyser, said he created Goblin.tools with his neurodivergent friends in mind. Its most popular feature is the “magic to-do,” where a user can enter a task and the bot will spit out a to-do list. They can even break down items on the list into smaller tasks.
“I’m not trying to build a cure,” he said, “but something that helps them out (for) two minutes out of the day that they would otherwise struggle with.”
Husson University professor Russell Fulmer describes the research around AI and ADHD as “inconclusive.” While experts say they see how artificial intelligence could have a positive impact on the lives of people with anxiety and ADHD, Fulmer said, it may not work perfectly for everyone, like people of color with ADHD.
He pointed to chatbot responses that have been racist and biased at times .
Valese Jones, a publicist and founder of Sincerely Nicole Media, was diagnosed with ADHD as a child and uses AI bots to help with reading and responding to emails and proofreading public relations plans. But its responses don’t always capture who she really is.
“I’m southern, so I talk like a southerner. There are cadences in my writing where you can kind of pick up on the fact that I’m southern, and that’s on purpose,” said Jones, who is Black. “It doesn’t pick up on Black women’s tone, and if you do put in like, ‘say it like African American,’ it automatically goes to talking like ‘Malibu’s Most Wanted.’”
And de Buyser said while he sees a future where AI chatbots function more like a personal assistant that is “never tired, never sleeps,” it could also have privacy implications.
“If you say, ‘Oh, I want an AI that gives me personal information and checks my calendar’ and all of that, you are giving that big company access to your emails, your calendar, personal correspondence, essentially your deepest, darkest secrets just so it can give you something useful back,” he warned.
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
As radioisotopes power the Perseverance rover to explore Mars, perseverance “powered” three winners to write essays each year till they achieved their mission goal of winning NASA’s Power to Explore Challenge . These students explored behind the scenes at NASA's Glenn Research Center and Great Lakes Science Center (GLSC) in Cleveland after writing the top essays in the national contest.
The competition for kindergarten through 12th grade students focuses on the enabling power of radioisotopes. Students were challenged to learn how NASA has powered some of its most famous science missions and to dream up how their personal “superpower” would energize their own radioisotope-powered science mission.
Judges narrowed down over a seventeen hundred creative essays to 45 semi-finalists, who received prize packs, nine finalists, who participated in a videoconference with NASA experts, and three winners, who were awarded with a visit to NASA Glenn.
Dr. Wanda Peters
Acting Deputy Director, NASA's Glenn Research Center
“I’m so impressed by the work of these talented young students,” said Dr. Wanda Peters, acting deputy center director at NASA Glenn. “It’s wonderful to see their interest, innovation, and creativity at this stage in their lives. Our future is bright!”
Rainie Lin , the kindergarten through fourth grade winner; Aadya Karthik , the fifth through eighth grade winner, and Thomas Liu , the ninth through 12th grade winner, toured several research facilities including the Electric Propulsion and Power Laboratory , Telescience Support Center , Graphics and Visualization Lab , and Simulated Lunar Operations Lab . Along the way, they met with engineers and researchers to learn about NASA’s missions and the technologies that are innovating exploration.
The next day students and their families traveled to GLSC, which houses NASA Glenn’s Visitor Center. Accompanied by members of NASA’s Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS) team, the group toured the visitor center and explored the many interactive displays.
“It was our pleasure to host the three student winners of The Power to Explore Challenge, and I hope that this visit will further inspire and motivate them to pursue their interests in science and exploration,” said Carl Sandifer, manager for NASA’s RPS Program. "We are so impressed by the ideas and quality of the essays submitted this year and we can’t wait to what new ideas student come up with for next year’s challenge!”
The Power to Explore Challenge asked students to learn about the RPS, one of NASA’s “nuclear batteries” it uses to explore some of the most extreme destinations in our solar system and beyond. Students then wrote about their own power to achieve goals in 250 words or less.
NASA will hold its fourth-annual Power to Explore Challenge later this fall. For more information on the challenge visit: The Power to Explore Writing Challenge homepage .
ABOUT THE CHALLENGE:
Power to Explore is a national essay challenge that asks students in grades K-12 to learn about Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS), a type of “nuclear battery” that NASA uses to explore some of the most extreme destinations in our solar system and beyond, and then write about, in 250 words or less, an RPS-powered space mission that would energize their space exploration dreams.
ABOUT FUTURE ENGINEERS:
Future Engineers hosts online contests and challenges for K-12 students. Previous challenges have helped produce historic achievements – from naming NASA’s Perseverance rover to manufacturing the first student-designed 3D print in space. All challenges are offered free for student and classroom participation. For more information, visit futureengineers.org . Follow Future Engineers on Twitter , Facebook , and Instagram .
Media Contact: Kristin Jansen Public Affairs Specialist Office of Communications NASA RPS Program Phone: 216-296-2203 Email: [email protected]
Radioisotope Power Systems
About Plutonium-238
Radioisotope Power Systems Missions
Radioisotope Power Systems Safety and Reliability
IMAGES
COMMENTS
In her multimedia thesis, Making Space for Others, Jackson (2013) investigated the socioeconomic factors that initiated a major movement toward coworking, and how ... Kenline (n.d.) also sees space and the culture of coworking as intertwined. She conceives of the spaces as "ecosystems," bounded externally by space and internally by . a
Initially, co-working spaces were born to support collaborative and mobile working habits of independent workers by offering attractive and flexible workspace with community. Later, co-working ...
Coworking Spaces have emerged as a new and promising phenomenon in entrepreneurship. Coworking Spaces provide efficiency, flexibility, and legitimacy. Coworking Spaces provide connections, solutions, energy/motivation, and social support. Founders, minorities, women, non-market logic, and foreign entrepreneurs benefit more.
This thesis consists of eight research articles that shed light on the structures, processes, and potentials of coworking-spaces by employing contemporary theoretical lenses, such as design ...
through co-working and collaboration increased. The aim of this study is to understand the potential of co-working spaces' influence on facilitating collaboration and to offer a brief regarding the fundamentals of collaboration in coworking spaces. The thesis examines two cases that have different
The main topic of this thesis was to find out whether coworking spaces have an impact on an employee's motivation and productivity in their work. The research was conducted through a qualitative study based on ten interviews with employees currently working in a coworking space. In the given analysis, thematic analysis was used.
Figure 1: Number of Coworking Spaces Worldwide Across Years My thesis makes an early attempt to conduct an international comparison on coworking companies ... research on financial and operation risks of co-working spaces and "co-working" bubble. 2.1 The introduction of coworking spaces Waters-Lynch, J. & Potts, J. (2017) defined coworking ...
The preferred characteristics of coworking spaces The relation between user characteristics and preferred coworking space characteristics: an attribute based stated choice experiment. J.G.C (Jasper) van de Koevering Master's thesis Eindhoven, 2017 1 The preferred characteristics of coworking spaces The relation between user characteristics ...
Co-working spaces are defined as "workplaces diverse groups of freelancers, remote workers, and other independent professionals work together in a shared, communal setting" (Spreitzer 2015). The cubicles of yesteryear are disappearing as greater attention is given to individual and collaborative work with open floor plans and varied ...
Literature review. The paper opens up with a brief meta-narrative review of the available literature on human talent and coworking spaces. This method provides a glimpse into a particular research tradition that has unfolded over time and examines the range of approaches to comprehensively study an issue to create an account of the subject's development (Gough 2013).
ABSTRACT. In the past decade, coworking spaces have emerged as a new and promising phenomenon within entrepre-. neurship. Due to its prevalence, popularity, and potential for disruptive change ...
The results of the thematic data analysis indicated four main factors that were considered as effective in their ability to foster knowledge creation dynamics within coworking spaces: Selection, Connecting, Interactive Design and Educating. The relevance of these factors however seemed to differ between coworking spaces that were either larger ...
Coworking spaces are flexible and shared work environments that make a significant effort to connect users with supportive networks that commonly result in efficient work outputs, a high level of ...
coworking-spaces and co-chaired my colloquium as second supervisor. Thank you for inspir-ing me, discussing ideas and pointing out pitfalls in the course of my thesis. Coworking and community are inevitably interconnected and my research shows that discuss-ing and competing increases the success. Likewise, I feel that the community and the chal-
This thesis aims to analyze how members of a coworking space create a Sense of Community through the different types of social interactions that occur. Furthermore, it is investigated how ... coworking space (Seo et al., 2017), there is a need to further study how a Sense of Community
Co-working spaces have spreading around the world at an unprecedented rate. Asian mega cities with the rise of the knowledge economy and ... at a co-working space company, the thesis has potential limitations in terms of time and resources. Firstly, the ideation and conduct of thesis . 2 research are under time constraints. Additionally, it ...
In the empirical part, this thesis focuses on coworking spaces of mid-sized cities in Sweden. By conducting a qualitative research, we identify professional developments that can be clustered in different entrepreneurial competencies. As stated in the findings, these competencies particularly develop through a combination of the following three ...
Residents will have over 11,000 square feet of private amenities, as well as retail space on the ground floor. Those working from home can take advantage of the co-working space and residents ...
The co-working space is defined with the concepts of flexibility, change, mobility, community-building and ideasharing (Fuzi, Clifton and Loudon, 2014;Makaklı, Yücesan and Ozar, 2019).
In this thesis, we introduce strategies to improve the electrochemical performance of vanadium-based and manganese-based cathodes in RAZBs through ionic pre-intercalation techniques and the integration of cathode-electrolyte interface layers, respectively. In particular, the RAZB with an improved vanadium-based cathode maintains 90% capacity ...
Entrepreneur Becky Litvintchouk works on her computer at a co-working space on Monday, Aug. 12, 2024, in New York. (AP Photo/Andres Kudacki) Read More. 2 of 3 | Entrepreneur Becky Litvintchouk works on her computer at a co-working space on Monday, Aug. 12, 2024, in New York. (AP Photo/Andres Kudacki)
File photo NEW DELHI: Smartworks Coworking Spaces Ltd has filed preliminary papers with capital markets regulator Sebi to raise funds through an initial public offering ().The proposed initial share sale is a combination of a fresh issue of equity shares worth Rs 550 crore and an Offer For Sale (OFS) of 67.59 lakh shares by promoters, according to the Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP).
India's commercial office space was about 841.2 million square feet as of March 31, 2024, and is expected to grow at an annual rate of 6.71 per cent to 1,079.3 million square feet by the end of ...
continues this theme, 'co-working spaces reflect the collective-driven, networked approach of the . open-source-idea translated into physical space' (Lange 201 1:16). However Lange observes the
As radioisotopes power the Perseverance rover to explore Mars, perseverance "powered" three winners to write essays each year till they achieved their mission goal of winning NASA's Power to Explore Challenge.These students explored behind the scenes at NASA's Glenn Research Center and Great Lakes Science Center (GLSC) in Cleveland after writing the top essays in the national contest.