special education assessment tools pdf

Loading to Current Technology Based Special Education Assessment Tool....

Special Education Assessment Checklist [PDF Included]

Imagine you’re a teacher in a special education classroom, surrounded by students with diverse needs and abilities. You’re determined to provide each of them with the best possible education, but with so many factors to consider, it can be challenging to ensure you’re covering all your bases. That’s where the Special Education Assessment Checklist comes in.

This comprehensive guide outlines everything you need to know about conducting assessments for your special education students and provides a step-by-step process for creating an effective evaluation plan. Whether you’re a seasoned special education teacher or wondering how to become one , this post is a must-read for anyone looking to support their students and drive meaningful progress in the classroom.

This article is an essential resource for anyone looking to provide the highest level of support for their students. With its clear, concise information and practical tips, the Special Education Assessment Checklist is the perfect tool for ensuring your students are making meaningful progress in the classroom.

Why is special education assessment crucial?

Special education assessments are crucial for several reasons. Firstly, they help to identify students who require special education services and determine their specific needs. Without an assessment, it can be difficult to determine which students require additional support and what kind of support is needed.

Secondly, assessments provide valuable information for developing individualized education plans (IEPs) for each student. The IEP is a legal document that outlines the student’s strengths, weaknesses, and goals, as well as the specific accommodations and services they will receive. The IEP is developed based on the results of the assessment, so it’s important that the assessment be thorough and accurate.

Thirdly, assessments are critical for monitoring student progress. By regularly re-assessing students, teachers can determine whether they are making progress toward their goals, and make any necessary adjustments to their IEPs to ensure continued progress.

Finally, assessments provide accountability for the special education program and the school. They demonstrate that the school is meeting its obligations to provide special education services to eligible students and that these services are making a difference in the lives of students.

Therefore, special education assessments are a critical component of providing effective special education services. They help identify students who require additional support, develop individualized education plans, monitor student progress, and provide accountability for the special education program and co-teaching models .

Special education assessment checklist

1.   Does the student exhibit difficulties with communication?

2.   Has the student demonstrated behavioral problems in the past?

3   Is the student able to effectively interact with their peers?

4.   Does the student struggle with fine motor skills?

5.   Are there academic skills that require improvement?

6.   Does the student have trouble maintaining attention and focus?

7.   Is the student’s sensory processing developmentally appropriate?

8.   Are there any concerns regarding executive functioning skills?

9.   Is the student able to understand and follow directions?

10.   Does the student have difficulty with self-care skills?

11.   Is the student able to communicate wants and needs effectively?

12.   Are there any physical limitations that impact the student’s daily life?

13.   Has the student displayed problematic behavior in school settings?

14.   Is the student able to form positive relationships with peers?

15.   Are there any difficulties with gross motor skills?

16.   Does the student require support in reading and writing?

17.   Are there concerns about the student’s ability to stay on task?

18.   Does the student show signs of sensory processing disorders?

19.   Are there any indications of difficulties with planning and organizing?

20.   Is the student able to participate in class discussions and activities?

21.   Has the student had any previous disciplinary actions taken in school?

The PDF of the checklist is attached below. You can download it for free.

How to use the checklist

The Special Education Assessment Checklist can be used in the following steps:

1. Review the list: Familiarize yourself with the items on the checklist to make sure you understand what information is needed.

2. Plan the assessment: Use the checklist as a guide to plan the assessment process. Determine which assessments are needed for each student, who will conduct the assessments, and when they will be completed.

3. Conduct the assessments: Follow the plan you created and complete the assessments for each student. Make sure to gather all the information and data needed for each item on the checklist. 

4. Review and analyze the results: After the assessments are completed, review the results and analyze the data. Use the information to identify each student’s strengths and weaknesses, and determine the specific services and accommodations they may need to support their learning.

5. Develop an individualized education plan (IEP): Based on the results of the assessment, create an individualized education plan (IEP) for each student. The IEP should include the student’s goals, services, and accommodations as well as a plan for monitoring progress and making adjustments as needed. Additionally, adding a plan for executing functioning skills is also necessary.

6. Implement the IEP: Once the IEP is developed, implement it in the classroom. Ensure that the student receives the services and accommodations outlined in the IEP and regularly monitor their progress to see if any adjustments are needed.

7. Evaluate and adjust: Regularly evaluate the student’s progress and adjust the IEP as needed to ensure that the student is making progress and receiving the support they need to be successful in the classroom.

The Special Education Assessment Checklist is a valuable tool for educators to support the assessment and planning process for students with special needs. By following these steps, educators can gather the information they need to develop an effective individualized education plan that meets the unique needs of each student.

Perks of using a special education assessment checklist

There are several benefits to using the Special Education Assessment Checklist, including:

1. Consistency: The Special Education Assessment Checklist provides a consistent framework for conducting assessments and evaluating students. This ensures that all students receive a comprehensive evaluation, with the same level of detail and consideration given to each student. This helps to eliminate any potential biases or inconsistencies in the evaluation process and ensures that all students receive fair and equal evaluations.

2.  Efficiency: The checklist helps to streamline the assessment process, providing a comprehensive list of what needs to be evaluated. This reduces the risk of missing important information, as all necessary aspects are covered in the checklist. This saves time and resources, as all evaluations are conducted in a systematic and organised manner.

3. Collaboration: The checklist can be used by a team of educators, including teachers, special education specialists, and other support staff. This ensures that all aspects of a student’s needs are considered in the assessment process and allows for a collective and collaborative approach to making decisions about the student’s education.

4. Accurate information: The checklist helps to ensure that accurate and relevant information is gathered, which can be used to make informed decisions about the student’s educational plan. This helps to identify the student’s strengths and weaknesses, allowing for a more targeted and effective individualized education plan.

5. Better outcomes: By using a comprehensive and consistent assessment process, educators can identify the specific needs of each student and develop an individualized education plan that provides the necessary support for success. This leads to better outcomes for students with special needs, as they receive the appropriate level of support and accommodations to succeed in the classroom.

Overall, the Special Education Assessment Checklist is a valuable tool for educators to support the assessment and planning process for students with special needs, leading to better outcomes for these students.

Just like DAP Checklist , Organizational Skills Checklist , and even an inclusive classroom environment checklist , the Special Education Assessment Checklist plays a crucial role in providing the best educational experience for students with special needs. This tool allows educators to approach each student’s assessment with a personalized and diligent approach, leading to well-informed decisions about their individualized education plan.

By utilizing the checklist, educators can ensure that no aspect of the student’s needs goes overlooked, providing them with the support they require to thrive in the classroom. The use of this tool serves as a testament to the commitment of educators to providing the highest quality of education for all students, no matter their unique needs.

An engineer, Maths expert, Online Tutor and animal rights activist. In more than 5+ years of my online teaching experience, I closely worked with many students struggling with dyscalculia and dyslexia. With the years passing, I learned that not much effort being put into the awareness of this learning disorder. Students with dyscalculia often misunderstood for having  just a simple math fear. This is still an underresearched and understudied subject. I am also the founder of  Smartynote -‘The notepad app for dyslexia’, 

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Assessment of Special Education Program in The Division of Aurora, Philippines

2019, International Journal of Science and Research Publications

This study focused on the assessment of the Special Education programs in the Division of Aurora, Philippines particularly those offerings of special education classes in the Districts of Dipaculao, Maria Aurora and Baler. The Special Education teachers and heads were young, mostly female, with SPED Teacher I item, young in service, master's degree holders, most of them did not specialized special education program in their undergraduate studies and with limited trainings attended. In terms of curriculum, the overall weighted mean was 3.33 with verbal description of "Observed", instructional material obtained an overall weighted mean of 3.68 which can be interpreted as "Sometimes Observed". In terms of facilities described as "Sometimes Observed" with the overall weighted mean of 3.65 and financial resources indicated as "Strongly Observed". Community involvement with an overall mean was 3.13 described as "Observed". Teachers perform community mapping at the end of school year in looking for pupils/students with disabilities and talking to the parents of the pupil/student with disability". Baler Central School obtained the highest number of enrolment with 46 pupils. Most of the schools used checklists to categorize the students according to their needs. Most SPED students are slow learner or with learning disability followed by hearing impaired and Down syndrome. The most common problems encountered by the school heads and teachers were the parents in the in-denial stage and the availability of instructional materials. Conducting orientation to the parents and tapping the Local Government Units for the financial assistance to support the program were strategies in addressing the problems encountered in the SPED programs. All the profiles on the curriculum implementation, instructional material, facilities of the SPED programs were found not significantly related. Training was the only profile significantly related to the financial resources with a correlation value of 0.582 with a significance value of 0.014. With regard to the community involvement, sex found significant with correlation value of 0.494 with significant value of 0.044. Status of implementation on "Curriculum" (t=17.909) and "Facilities" (t = 11.8) obtained significantly different when the schools were grouped into elementary and secondary schools.

Related Papers

SMCC Higher Education Research Journal

AJHSSR Journal

This study examined Fiscal Year 2021 SEF use in Bulan III District, Bulan Sorsogon, schools. Fifteen Bulan III District school principals responded. Enrollments, teachers, students, MOOE, and SBM level classify Bulan III District schools. It examined how the Special Education Fund was utilized for public school operation and maintenance, construction and repair of school buildings, facilities, and equipment, educational research, book and periodical purchases, and sports development. The research looked at SEF usage issues, factors, and a suggested action plan. Based on the findings, it was concluded that the majority of schools in Bulan III District are small, with nine teachers or less, a MOOE allotment of P26,000-P30,000, and SBM Level 1 accreditation; construction and repair of school buildings are the top priorities in using Special Education Fund; and the top three problems schools faced were the delayed release of SEF budget, poor coordination of LGU personnel to schools during transactions, and insufficient procurement of school supplies. It recommends that other school needs, such as sports and research development, may also be addressed to enhance student growth and research culture; schools may engage in fund-raising initiatives to enhance the budget for sports and research development; and an action plan may be adopted following a comprehensive examination and evaluation by the relevant authorities.

African Educational Research Journal

Leonora De Jesus

Journal of ICSAR

hayatun thaibah

The evaluation obtained depends on the objectives of the evaluation program it self which of course have been formulated previously and are accounted for in the form of a program, to reward program implementers, for selection and promotion, for program improvement, and to predict the possibility of continuing the program in the future. This research is to find out the differences in the evaluation results of 2 Special Public Schools in the City of Banjarmasin, Indonesia. This type of research approach is to use a quantitative approach. The data collection technique was through a questionnaire accompanied by free interviews addressed to several teachers and the principal. The subjects of the study were 33 people, with details at the Pelambuan State Special School in Banjarmasin as many as 16 people and 17 people at the Public Special School 2 Banjarmasin City. The results of the data were analyzed using independent sample t test. The value of t count is 1.120 < t table is 2.040, t...

VIVIAN B A N D O L E S FLORES

Employing descriptive method of research , this study determines the problems met in the implementation of K to 12 Program in selected schools of Sta. Maria District, school year 2013-2014. It involves 93 randomly selected Grades I and II teachers. Descriptive and inferential statistics, such as, frequency, percentage, weighted mean t-test for independent Samples (2-tailed) and one –way analysis of Variance are used to explain results. The findings reveal that all (93 0f 100%) of the grades I and II teachers are females. Thirty-four (34) of them are with 10 years and below teaching experience, majority (47 or 52%) are BS with MA units, speaks Chavacano. The problems in the implementation of the K to 12 Program are competence, language policies, preparation, instructional materials, attitudes of the implementers and references are moderately serious; there is a significant difference on the problem of instructional materials , when teachers are categorized according to gender. However, there is no significant difference on problem met by Grades 1 and II teachers on teachers competence: language policies, preparation, instructional materials, attitudes and references when categorized as to length of service, educational qualification and mother tongue. The study recommends that Grades I and II teachers be advised to complete graduate studies for professional advancement. The Department of Education through the Office of the City Schools Division Superintendent of Zamboanga may provide adequate instructional materials for teachers and pupils. The Division Office in Zamboanga City may also hold enhancement training for concerned teachers in the implementation of the K to 12 Program. Lastly, similar studies is recommended to validate the findings of the present investigation.

The main purpose of this study was to find out the contributions and challenges of Sebeta Special School for the students with visual impairments. The research design used was qualitative case study method as this would enable the researcher to make in-depth study of the case from different perspectives. For responding to this main purpose of the study, purposive sampling was used and the subjects of the study were selected by purposive sampling technique as they were taught to have the necessary information for the problem under study. Accordingly, twelve teachers, (six males and six females), ten members of the support staff (five males and five females) and twelve students of grades five to eight (six males and six females) were selected for focus group discussions. Besides, interview was conducted with the director and vice-director of the school and two teachers (a male and a female) and two students of grades five to eight (a male and a female).Relevant documents and observation checklists were also used as data sources. Finally, the data collected were organized, thematically analyzed and presented. Regarding the contributions made, the findings revealed that the school has been serving the students as school to learn in and succeed, home to live in and family to leave with. There were also services being delivered for the students and different resources were also available in the special school. Findings displayed that challenges to the special school as manpower assignment was not need based and there were lack of skills necessary to run activities in the special school as reading and writing braille, inadequate budget and resources like student textbooks transcribed in to braille and wastages in usage of the available resources. Besides, there were conditions that violate the safety of students. The recommendations made included such things as alleviating the challenges the school encountered such as appropriate use of resource, availing the necessary resources as braille textbooks, budget and others.

The study was conducted to evaluate the current status of Special Education programs in the province of Zambales, Philippines and the relevance of the curriculum of Teacher Education Program at Pres. Ramon Magsaysay State University. To date, no evaluation of the implementation has been conducted to determine if program objectives are being met. This also aims to provide support and feedback to administrators, teachers, learners and other stake holders. Likewise, this would help in identifying and documenting program strengths and weaknesses as basis for program development/enhancement. The study made used of descriptive developmental method of research with questionnaire and unstructured interview as the main instrument to gather data from 19 Administrators and 26 SPED teacher-respondents. Findings obtained in the study revealed that the profile of the SPED Centers in terms of management staff are school administrators who are occupying a Principal 3 position, 10.4 years in the service, MA graduate, major in Elementary Education but have inadequate training in Special Education. The teacher respondents are occupying a Teacher 3 position, 6.5 years in service with MA units, major in Elementary Education. Training is inadequate for the SPED positions. The categories of LSEN catered mostly are Learning Disability, Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability. The areas of concern of the SPED Centers are administrative, professional, curricular and instructional concerns.The existing curriculum program for Teacher Education Program does not address the needs of special education teachers and school administrators in the province of Zambales.

Anna Grace Julian

SPED111 Curriculum in SPED 2 As I had asked some of the students who had taken special education and had recently graduated, some of them said that special education is not affected by the K to 12 Program, primarily because their curriculum is different from that of general education. However, some of the teachers in this field said that yes, the K to 12 curricula has affected the delivery of special education services in the Philippines, due to the fact that the new curriculum now is performance-based, unlike the situation before wherein conventional manners and expectations in teaching were used. This is good and can be a help for students with special needs to be more productive in their respective classes. Since 2012, the Department of Education issued an article that the public special education schools must abide by the rules of K to 12 to further enhance the curriculum of the SPED. As said by then Education Secretary Armin Luistro, the SPED schools will be given the same education or lesson modules that are similar to those used by regular students, but teachers will provide modifications that will ensure that it would be suited to every individual, each with unique learning needs. Also, for children who were said to be gifted, they will be given accommodations that will more enhance the learners beyond the regular curriculum. They will also imply various task analyses to every child with special needs. For children who cannot keep up with the pace of other children, they will extend the learning days for the child. In 2014, the Department of Education released Department Order 46, s. 2014, entitled Guidelines on the Implementation of the Alternative Learning System for Persons With Disability (ALS for PWD) Program. This order empowers the Education for All advocacy by the DepEd. Also, the ALS Basic Literacy Program and the Accreditation and Equivalency Program are designed to stretch out an arm to the people with hearing and visual impairment and give suitable learning interventions for them.

International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM)

Guarin S . Maguate

This study aimed to determine the level of assessment of School Improvement Plan 2013-2015: basis for the Technical Assistance Plan in the Division of Sagay City, Negros Occidental. The respondents of the study were the 72 school heads, 72 teachers-representatives who were member of the school planning team, 72 parents and 25 LGU representatives in the Division of Sagay City. The validated instruments were distributed and discussed during the Focus Group Discussion to the four group of respondents. The study employed the descriptive research design. The processing of data was done with the use of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Software.The mean was used to determine the level of assessment of the four groups of respondents in the three phases and when they are grouped according to their profile variables. Mann-Whitney U-Test was used to determine whether or not significant difference existed on the level of assessment of school improvement plan in the three phases when the four group of respondents were grouped and compared according to their profile variables. Qualitative questions were classified, grouped and synthesized based on the magnitude of observation for intervention. Results of the study showed that the level of assessment of the school heads revealed a very high rating in the Assess, Plan and Act phases and when taken as a whole. Teachers rated the three phases in a high level. Parents rated the Assess phase in a high level, while Plan and Act phases in a moderate level. Likewise, LGU representatives rates the Assess phase in a very high level, Plan phase as high level and the Act phase as moderate level. When differences were considered school heads, parents and LGU representatives find no significant difference on the level of assessment on school improvement plan. Teachers revealed a significant difference in the Assess phase when grouped and compared according to position title. For the Plan phase, a significant difference found when grouped according to highest educational attainment, position title and average family monthly income. Further, for Act phase, a significant difference existed when grouped according to age. The rest of the responses find no significant difference. Examining deeper the results of the study reveals that it is essential for DepEd Division of Sagay City to package technical assistance plan for the four respondents on various issues contributory to the crafting of School Improvement Plan.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Jupiter Petilla

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences

RIZA A. BELTRAN

iJSRED Journal , sherralyn cablao

Jennifer Tingley

Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal

Psychology and Education

Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies

SÜLEYMAN GÖKSOY

Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal

KARLYN RICO

Igor Grygus

sciepub.com SciEP

Journal of Education & Humanities Research (JEHR)

Dr Tahira Bibi

OFELIA M. DEL MUNDO

OFELIA DEL MUNDO

Jyanee Loi Yecla

Christopher Cocal

JPGI (Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia)

edi harapan

claudia ika sukowati

jessica avenido

G.R.U Lusaka

mordecai mfula

IAEME PUBLICATION

IAEME Publication

Başak Bağlama , Yazgülü Demir

IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal

IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal ( IIMRJ) , ERMA VALENZUELA

Fahmi Rizal

Ma. Annabelle D. Daca and Lanie M. Pacadaljen

Lanie M . Pacadaljen

EDUCATUM (Journal of Social Sceince)

Rashid Ceazar Ormilla

Nuruhussien Seid

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024