Karl Marx Sociologist: Contributions and Theory
Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc
Associate Editor for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education
Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Saul McLeod, PhD
Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester
Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.
On This Page:
Marxism is a social, political, and economic theory proposed by Karl Marx in the 19th century, and Marxists are those who ascribe to the ideas of Marxism.
Karl Marx was a German philosopher interested in exploring the relationship between the economy and the people working within the economic system.
Marx’s theory was strongly based on the struggles of the working class during the Industrial Revolution in Europe. He explained how there are power relationships between the capitalists and the workers, which are exploitative and would eventually cause class conflict.
According to Marx, the workers are those from a low social class, which he termed the proletariat, whereas those few in charge, the wealthy bosses, owners, and managers, are what he termed the bourgeoisie.
The proletariat are the individuals who perform labor that is then taken and sold by the bourgeoisie so that they themselves receive profit while the workers receive minimal wages.
Noteworthy writings of Marxism include Capital by Marx and The Communist Manifesto written by Marx and Friedrich Engels. These writings describe the features of Marxist ideology, including the struggle of the working class, capitalism, and how a classless society is needed to end the class conflict.
Key Takeaways
- Karl Marx was a German philosopher who, in the 19th century, began exploring the relationship between the economy and the people who work within the economic system.
- The basic idea of Marx’s theory is that society is characterized by the struggle between the workers and those in charge. The workers are those of lower social classes, which he termed the proletariat.
- The few in charge, who are the bosses, owners, and managers of an upper social class, are what he termed the bourgeoisie. The proletariat are the individuals who perform the labor, while the bourgeoisie obtains the profits from this labor. From this system, Marx argued that the workers are exploited while those in power get more powerful and wealthier.
- The workers are viewed as slaves of the bourgeoisie, given wages for their labor that is the minimum subsidence so that they can just about survive while also depending on their labor that they cannot simply quit (Marx & Engels, 2019).
- The writings ‘Capital’ by Marx and ‘The Communist Manifesto’ written by Marx and Friedrich Engels are noteworthy pieces that lay out what is now referred to as Marxism.
- These writings discuss capitalism, which is believed to eventually stagnate due to the increased struggle between the social classes.
- Marxist ideology predicts that there will be a proletariat revolution whereby capitalism will end, to be replaced by communism.
The Basic Principles Of Marx’s Theory
Class struggle.
Marx argued that there were two social classes; the working-class laborers, known as the proletariat, and the wealthy bourgeoise, who controlled the workers.
Marx argued that there is a struggle between the social classes. While the bourgeoisie is concerned with the means of producing via the laborers, those who conduct the labor, the proletariat , want to end this exploitation.
Marx explained that there is a constant conflict between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. While the bourgeoisie aims to make as much profit as possible by exploiting the labor of others, the proletariat is dissatisfied with this exploitation and wants to end it.
Class tensions are thought to increase with the opposing desires of those who want bigger profits and the workers who defend their right to fair pay and working conditions.
Competition in the market and the desire for bigger profits compels the bourgeoisie to further exploit their workers, who defend their rights and working conditions. These opposing desires of pushing the rate of exploitation in opposite directions create class tensions.
Over time, there is a broader division of labor and increased use of machinery to complete the labor. Marx and Engels argued that with this came an increase in the burden of toil, whether by the work hours getting longer, an increase in the amount of work in a given time, or by the increased speed of the machinery.
The workers are viewed as slaves of the bourgeoisie and the machine, given wages for their labor that is the minimum subsidence so they can just about survive while also depending on their labor (Marx & Engels, 2019).
The struggle between social classes was initially confined to individual factories. However, as capitalism matured, personal struggles became generalized to coalitions across factories and eventually manifested at societal levels (Rummel, 1977).
Marxists believe that the division between classes will widen with the exploitation of the workers deteriorating so severely that the social structure collapses and transforms into a proletarian revolution . A classless society will pursue erasing any exploitation or political authority (Rummel, 1977).
Theory of Capitalism
Capitalism is an economic system in which private individuals have the means of control over their own property, with the motivation to make as much profit as possible.
Marx describes capitalists as those who exploit the hard work of the laborers and pay them as little as possible to ensure the highest profits. The capitalists believe they are entitled to the profits made from their workers’ labor, which Marx viewed as theft.
Marx described the capitalists as the bourgeoisie business owners who organized the means of production, such as any tools or machinery used, and were entitled to any profit made.
Marxists believe that most societies are capitalist. That such a system is accepted without the need for violence or coercion is said to reflect the fact that the capitalists have a strong influence over ideas in society (Rose, 2005).
Marx saw profit as theft since the capitalists are stealing the hard work of the laborers, selling goods and services for an enormous profit while paying the laborers as little as possible. Workers’ labor is bought and sold like any other commodity.
That such a system is accepted without the need for violence or coercion reflects the fact that the capitalists have a strong influence over ideas in society (Rosen, 2005).
Marx viewed capitalism as an unstable system that would eventually result in a series of crises. The means of exploitation built into a capitalist economic system will be the source of social revolt and ultimately lead to capitalism”s dismantling.
Marx and Engels proposed that there would eventually be a proletariat revolution caused by continued exploitation by capitalists. The workers will revolt due to increasingly worse working conditions and wages.
In The Communist Manifesto , Marx and Engels proposed that after the proletariat revolution, the means of production from the bourgeoisie would end and be replaced with collective ownership over economic assets. This is a move from capitalism to communism.
The result of the revolution is that capitalism will be replaced by a classless society in which private property will be replaced with collective ownership. This will mean that society will become communist. With private property abolished, the means of production will come to a common agreement, what is called the communal ownership of goods.
Communism would aim to create a classless society in which no social class would exploit the labor of the other. In a communist society, accumulated labor is but a means to widen, enrich, and promote the laborer’s existence (Marx & Engels, 2019).
According to Marxism, the key features of a communist society are that there would be no private property or inherited wealth, steeply graduated income tax, centralized control of the banking, communication, and transport industries, and free public education (Marx & Engels, 2019).
Conflict Theory
Karl Marx is known as the developer of conflict theory . This is the idea that society is in a state of perpetual conflict because of two or more groups with competing and incompatible interests. It is the theory that power struggles and dynamics drive societal change.
Marx concentrated on the conflict between the social classes: those of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat . The power the bourgeoisie hold can be found in their material resources, accumulated wealth, and social status.
As capitalism develops, there are fewer but more powerful individuals in the upper class, which creates conflict with a majority oppressed class. The two groups are in a struggle, and resources are unjustly distributed to the few.
Marx reasoned that as the social conditions worsened for the workers (e.g., through lower pay), they would develop a class consciousness that revealed that their exploitation was at the hands of the capitalist. The workers can make demands to ease the conflict, but conditions would eventually get worse again.
According to Marx, the only way to end the cycle of conflict is to bring about communism.
Theory Of Alienation
Alienation means the lack of power, control, and fulfillment experienced by workers in capitalist societies in which the means of producing goods are privately owned and controlled.
Marx described a division of labor , meaning that the production workers increasingly feel separated from their work. Workers have moved away from an artisanal approach to work when one person works on one product.
With the increase in machinery, technological advancements, and assembly lines where many people work on one product, there is a loss of meaning to individual workers (Marx, 1992).
As this division of labor increases along with the extent of production required for the market, the workers become more dependent on their labor for mere survival. As capitalist production becomes more technical, the workers’ productivity increases, but the final product of their labor is not for the worker to enjoy – it is the property of the capitalist (Prychitko, 2002).
In The Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels suggest that under capitalism, the proletariat loses all individual character, becoming ‘an appendage of the machine’; thus, their work becomes alien (Marx & Engels, 2019).
The proletariat loses agency over their work lives, instead, this is determined by the bourgeoisie, including when and how long to work. Thus, the workers view their labor as something alien to them.
Marx describes alienated labor as forced and involuntary labor in which the worker finds no purpose, pleasure, contentment, or power. The worker feels isolated and insignificant, seeing their labor as purely for wages (Mukhopadhyay, 2020).
As the division of labor increases along with the extent of production required for the market, the workers become more dependent on their labor for mere survival. Their productivity increases as capitalist production become more technical, but as a result, the final product is not for them to enjoy, rather, it is the property of the capitalist (Prychitko, 2002).
Thus, the workers view their labor as something alien. Not only the object but the process of production is alien, for it is no longer a creative activity.
Marx describes alienated labor in his writings as forced and involuntary labor in which the worker finds no purpose, pleasure, contentment, or power. The worker feels isolated and insignificant, seeing their labor as purely for wages (Mukhopadhyay, 2020).
Historical Materialism
Marx proposed a theory of historical materialism in which he describes stages or epochs that societies pass through. These are primitive communism, slave society, feudalism, capitalism, and advanced communism.
Marx used historical materialism to attempt to explain where society has come from, why it is the way that it is, and where it is heading.
Primitive communism was a time when society was free of social class divisions, and there were simply hunters and gathers who obtained enough food for survival. Since there was not a surplus of production, there was no exploitation.
Slave society is thought of as the first stage of exploitation. This is when there was a division between the wealthy aristocrats and those who were slaves. This epoch gave way to more advanced productive forces, with the means of production being by the people who were the property of the slaveowners.
Feudalism was a dominant social system in medieval Europe, and society was divided into landowners and land occupiers. It was a system in which people were given land and protection by the nobles, who had to work and fight for them in return. Essentially, in feudalism, the landowners exploited the land occupiers.
Marx proposed that the current society is a capitalist one in which there are private property owners who exploit the labor of their workers, whom they pay as little as possible to obtain high profits. This epoch is viewed as the wealthiest in society exploiting the poorest.
Marx’s prediction for the next epoch of society is that it will be an advanced communist one. In a communist society, there would be shared resources and wealth and no exploitation.
This was Marx’s idea of a utopia in which the system benefits most people in society rather than a small minority.
Critical Theory
Marxism would come to facilitate the development of critical theories and cultural studies.
Critical theory is a philosophical approach to culture — especially literature — that seeks to confront the social, historical, and ideological forces and structures of power that produce and constrain culture.
The first and most notable critical theorists are the members of the Frankfurt School (Bohman, 2005).
The critical method of analysis has far-reaching academic influence. Often, critical theorists are preoccupied with critiquing modernity and capitalist society, the definition of what it means to be free in society, and the detection of wrongs in society.
Critical theorists often use a specific interpretation of Marxist philosophy focusing on economic and political ideas such as commodification, reification, fetishization, and the critique of mass culture.
Stages of Societal Development in Marxism
Marxism believes that economic systems in societies go through five stages, these are:
1. Primitive Communism
Marx and Engels conceptualized society prior to antiquity as free of social class division as hunter-gatherers gathered just enough to survive. Because everyone in this system worked for subsistence, there was no surplus production, thus making exploitation impossible.
2. Antiquity
Antiquity, to Marx, represented the first stage of exploitation between two classes, as the dynamic between aristocrats and their slaves and servants characterized society.
3. Feudalism
The second stage of exploitation in Marx’s vision of society was medieval society. Divided into landowners and occupiers, the lords and landlords exploited those who cultivated their lands by taking a portion of their yield.
4. Capitalist Society
Marxism focuses most heavily on the ills of contemporary capitalist society. In this system, anyone could trade with anyone and were free to make money from their own goods and services.
However, according to Marx and Engels, this just as powerfully bred injustice through the exploitation of the poor by the rich. Marx and Engels were particularly inspired by the conditions of their era, the industrial revolution.
Karl Marx was born in what is now Western Germany, and he experienced England at the turn of the Industrial Revolution.
Witnessing first-hand the exploitation of British factory workers, the pair conducted a series of profiles of laborers and collaboratively authored The Communist Manifesto (Prychitko, 1991).
Although the ideas of Marxism seemed to take hold by the first half of the twentieth century, as the Bolshevik revolution in Russia and the spread of communism came to define much of Eastern Europe, their association — the USSR — began to reject Marxist ideology, entering a transition toward private property rights and a market exchange system.
The societies of Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Romania, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Albania, and the other Soviet states shifted to a capitalist and consumerist system, and the USSR collapsed in 1991 (Prychitko, 2002).
5. Advanced Communism
After the fall of the current capitalist system, Marx predicted a utopian society involving shared resources, wealth, and equality.
Strengths of Marxism
Marx’s ideas of society are a source of many useful insights and arguments, many of which remain relevant for modern analyses of society. While some ideas may have lost some relevance, the legacy of Marxism has endured (Burawoy & Wright, 2001).
Karl Marx has remained a prominent and influential figure in the world of sociology. In particular, his ideas on conflict theory gave rise to other conflict theories that developed later, including race-conflict theory, gender-conflict theory, and intersectional theory .
These theories provide sociologists with ways to understand power, control, freedom, and exploitation in society.
Due to Marx’s understanding of capitalism, we have a better understanding of how society functions and why we may have certain ideas about labor.
Marx provided the understanding that capitalism may be the cause of why society holds these views and how it teaches us to be competitive and conformist.
Many institutions are believed to use capitalist ideology to justify inequalities. For instance, educational institutions socialize children into working hard and being obedient.
With the increase of technological advancements in the workplace and the seemingly excessive number of products in the modern world – a lot of which would be considered non-essential- supports Marx’s ideas about capitalism.
Marxism can help sociologists understand how past revolutions have occurred in capitalist societies. It is considered a social theory of vital importance for understanding the issues and possibilities of social change and social reproduction in modern societies.
While not every element within Marxism is sustainable, Marxist ideas can be built upon to challenge and transform it (Burawoy & Wright, 2001).
Criticisms of Marxism
Marxism can be criticized for being overly simplistic in the idea of society being split into two social classes. There are different levels of wealth in society, so it is more likely that there are several social classes.
Likewise, Marx’s theory ignores other factors that contribute to social inequality, such as a person’s race and religion. A person’s gender is also mostly ignored by Marxism. Feminists would suggest that gender provides a greater social division in society rather than social class.
Marxism is argued to be a doctrine with little relevance for serious social change. It is said to be ideological for mobilizing political parties and social movements but lacks scientific credibility (Burawoy & Wright, 2001). It is thought to be unlikely that there would be total social class equality in a communist society.
Further, communist ideas have been introduced in some countries and have not fared well. For instance, there was a fall of communism in the former socialist state of the USSR. Therefore, a Marxist society, while promising in theory, may not be fully sustainable unless reconstructed.
In general, there are negative connotations about those who are unemployed, considering those who take too much time off as lazy and holding the belief that more belongings make people happier.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the main goals of marxism.
The main goal of Marxism is to achieve a classless society that is not only adopted in one society but on a global scale.
Marx’s idea was to design a social system that eliminates exploitation and differences in power between groups of people.
In communism, the proletariat has political power, and private property is abolished. In a communist society, private ownership will be replaced with collective ownership over economic assets.
What Is The Importance of Marxism In Society?
Karl Marx is one of the most prominent and influential figures in sociological theory. These ideas on conflict theory have given rise to different conflict theories, such as race-conflict theory, gender-conflict theory, and intersectional theory.
Marx’s explanations of capitalism have provided a deep understanding of how society functions and enabled people to think critically about the labor they do.
Marx further offered that capitalism may be why society holds particular views about labor, including negative judgments about those who do not work and why people are competitive and conformist.
Is Marxism Still Relevant Today?
While some ideas of Marxism may be outdated and may not necessarily be a comprehensive theory for social change, they can still help understand some of the key social mechanisms in a society divided by class.
Marxism offers a way to understand history and economics, as well as an explanation of the global capitalist crisis. It can be argued that exploitation is still at the heart of a capitalist system enforced by those in the upper social classes.
Marxism also captures how capitalism develops and impacts specific world regions, specifically how some regions are developed unevenly relative to one another. Marxists would argue that unregulated commodification comes with environmental hazards, the costs of which are becoming increasingly clear (Fasenfest, 2018).
What were the criticisms of Marx on capitalism?
Karl Marx criticized capitalism for its inherent exploitation of the working class, who, he argued, were not fairly compensated for their labor. He also highlighted the alienation workers experience due to a lack of control over the production process and the products they create.
Marx further criticized capitalism’s tendency towards periodic economic crises and its creation of social inequality through the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of the bourgeoisie, or the capitalist class.
Burawoy, M., & Wright, E. O. (2001). Sociological marxism. In Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 459-486). Springer, Boston, MA.
Callinicos, A. (2011). The revolutionary ideas of Karl Marx. Haymarket Books.
Fasenfest, D. (2018). Is Marx still relevant?. Critical Sociology , 44(6), 851-855.
Marx, K. (1873). Capital: A critical analysis of capitalist production . Humboldt.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1967). The communist manifesto . 1848. Trans. Samuel Moore. London: Penguin, 15.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2019). The communist manifesto. In Ideals and Ideologies (pp. 243-255). Routledge.
Mukhopadhyay, R. (2020). Karl Marx”s Theory of Alienation . Available at SSRN 3843057.
Poulantzis, N. (1975). Social Classes in Contemporary Capitalism . London: New Left Books.
Prychitko, D. L. (Ed.). (2002). Markets, Planning, and Democracy: Essays after the Collapse of Communism . Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rosen, M. (2005). Marx, Karl. Ed. Edward Craig. The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 619-631.
Rummel, R. J. (1977). Understanding conflict and war: Vol. 3: Conflict in perspective. Beverly Hills: Sage.
- Books, Journals, Papers
- Guides & How To’s
- Life Around The World
- Research Methods
- Functionalism
- Postmodernism
- Social Constructionism
- Structuralism
- Symbolic Interactionism
- Sociology Theorists
- General Sociology
- Social Policy
- Social Work
- Sociology of Childhood
- Sociology of Crime & Deviance
- Sociology of Art
- Sociology of Dance
- Sociology of Food
- Sociology of Sport
- Sociology of Disability
- Sociology of Economics
- Sociology of Education
- Sociology of Emotion
- Sociology of Family & Relationships
- Sociology of Gender
- Sociology of Health
- Sociology of Identity
- Sociology of Ideology
- Sociology of Inequalities
- Sociology of Knowledge
- Sociology of Language
- Sociology of Law
- Sociology of Anime
- Sociology of Film
- Sociology of Gaming
- Sociology of Literature
- Sociology of Music
- Sociology of TV
- Sociology of Migration
- Sociology of Nature & Environment
- Sociology of Politics
- Sociology of Power
- Sociology of Race & Ethnicity
- Sociology of Religion
- Sociology of Sexuality
- Sociology of Social Movements
- Sociology of Technology
- Sociology of the Life Course
- Sociology of Travel & Tourism
- Sociology of Violence & Conflict
- Sociology of Work
- Urban Sociology
- Changing Relationships Within Families
- Conjugal Role Relationships
- Criticisms of Families
- Family Forms
- Functions of the Family
- Featured Articles
- Privacy Policy
- Terms & Conditions
The Marxist View of Social Class in Sociology
In sociology, the Marxist view of social class provides a critical analysis of the hierarchical structure of society and the role that social class plays in shaping individuals’ lives. Developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Marxism offers a unique perspective on class struggle, capitalism, and the inherent inequalities present in society.
Understanding Social Class
Social class refers to the division of society based on economic factors, such as wealth, income, and occupation. It is a system that categorizes individuals into different groups based on their socioeconomic status, power , and access to resources. Marxists argue that social class is not merely a reflection of individual characteristics but is deeply rooted in the structure of society.
Key Concepts of the Marxist View
Marxism emphasizes the following key concepts when examining social class:
1. Mode of Production
Marxists believe that social class is primarily determined by the mode of production, which refers to the way society organizes the production and distribution of goods and services. According to Marx , there are two main classes in capitalist societies: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat.
– The bourgeoisie: This class consists of the capitalist owners of the means of production, such as factories, land, and machinery. They control the means of production and exploit the labor of the proletariat to generate profits.
– The proletariat: This class comprises the working class, who do not own the means of production and must sell their labor to the bourgeoisie to survive. The proletariat is seen as being exploited by the bourgeoisie, as they receive only a fraction of the value they create through their labor.
2. Class Struggle
Marxism argues that social class is not a static category but is characterized by ongoing class struggle. Class struggle refers to the conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, as the two classes have opposing interests. The bourgeoisie seeks to maintain their power and maximize profits, while the proletariat aims to improve their working conditions and reduce exploitation.
Marxists believe that class struggle is an inherent feature of capitalist societies and that it ultimately leads to social change. They argue that the proletariat, through collective action and revolution, will overthrow the bourgeoisie and establish a classless society.
3. False Consciousness and Ideology
Marxists also highlight the concept of false consciousness and ideology as important factors in perpetuating social inequality . False consciousness refers to the distorted perception that individuals have about their own social class and the class system. It occurs when individuals are unaware of their exploitation and believe that the existing social order is natural and just.
Marxists argue that false consciousness is perpetuated by ideology, which refers to the dominant ideas, beliefs, and values that are promoted by the ruling class to maintain their power. Ideology serves to justify and legitimize the existing social hierarchy, making it difficult for the proletariat to recognize their own class interests and challenge the status quo.
Critiques of the Marxist View
While the Marxist view of social class offers valuable insights into the dynamics of capitalism and class struggle, it has also faced criticism:
1. Oversimplification of Social Class
Critics argue that Marxism oversimplifies social class by reducing it to a binary division between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. They argue that there are multiple layers and complexities within social class, including the middle class, which does not fit neatly into the Marxist framework.
2. Neglect of Non-Economic Factors
Marxism tends to prioritize economic factors over other dimensions, such as race, gender, and sexuality, which also contribute to social inequalities. Critics argue that these non-economic factors intersect with social class and shape individuals’ experiences in ways that Marxism may overlook.
3. Failure to Achieve Classless Society
Marxism has been criticized for its failure to achieve a classless society in practice. Critics argue that attempts to implement Marxist ideologies in various countries have resulted in authoritarian regimes and further social inequalities.
The Marxist view of social class provides a critical lens through which to examine the inequalities and power dynamics within society. It highlights the role of social class in shaping individuals’ lives and emphasizes the importance of class struggle and collective action in challenging the existing social order. While the Marxist perspective has faced criticism, it continues to be influential in sociological analyses of social class and inequality.
Mr Edwards has a PhD in sociology and 10 years of experience in sociological knowledge
Related Articles
The Proletariat in Modern Britain: A Sociological Perspective
Learn about the composition of the proletariat in contemporary British society. This article discusses manual laborers, service industry workers, gig...
Forces of Production: A Sociological Exploration
The concept of "forces of production" is central to Marxist theory and has been a foundational element in the sociological...
Understanding Oppression in Sociology
The Psychological Effects of Misogyny: An Outline and Explanation
The Postmodernist View of the Welfare State in Sociology
Get the latest sociology.
How would you rate the content on Easy Sociology?
Recommended
Blockbusting in Sociology: An Outline and Explanation
Exploring Determinism: Understanding the Influence of External Forces on Human Behavior and Social Change
24 hour trending.
Robert Merton’s Strain Theory Explained
Pierre bourdieu’s symbolic violence: an outline and explanation, structuration theory: an introduction, extended families: roles, functions, and cultural variations, the functionalist perspective on gender in sociology.
Easy Sociology makes sociology as easy as possible. Our aim is to make sociology accessible for everybody. © 2023 Easy Sociology
© 2023 Easy Sociology
ReviseSociology
A level sociology revision – education, families, research methods, crime and deviance and more!
Evaluate the Marxist View of the Role of Education in Society
An essay evaluating the Marxist view of education covering ideological state apparatus, correspondence principle, the reproduction and legitimation of class inequality.
Last Updated on November 18, 2022 by Karl Thompson
According to Marxists, modern societies are capitalist, and are structured along class-lines, and such societies are divided into two major classes – The Bourgeois elite who own and control the means of production who exploit the Proletariat by extracting surplus value from them.
Traditional Marxists understand the role of education in this context – education is controlled by the elite class (The Bourgeoisie) and schools forms a central part of the superstructure through which they maintain ideological control of the proletariat.
Education has four main roles in society according to Marxists:
- acting as the state apparatus
- producing an obedient workforce
- the reproduction of class inequality
- the legitimation of class inequality.
Louis Althusser argued that state education formed part of the ‘ ideological state apparatus ‘: the government and teachers control the masses by injecting millions of children with a set of ideas which keep people unaware of their exploitation and make them easy to control.
According to Althusser, education operates as an ideological state apparatus in two ways; Firstly, it transmits a general ideology which states that capitalism is just and reasonable – the natural and fairest way of organising society, and portraying alternative systems as unnatural and irrational Secondly, schools encourage pupils to passively accept their future roles, as outlined in the next point…
The second function schools perform for Capitalism is that they produce a compliant and obedient workforce…
In ‘Schooling in Capitalist America’ (1976) Bowles and Gintis suggest that there is a correspondence between values learnt at school and the way in which the workplace operates. The values, they suggested, are taught through the ‘Hidden Curriculum’, which consists of those things that pupils learn through the experience of attending school rather than the main curriculum subjects taught at the school. So pupils learn those values that are necessary for them to tow the line in menial manual jobs.
For example passive subservience of pupils to teachers corresponds to the passive subservience of workers to managers; acceptance of hierarchy (authority of teachers) corresponds to the authority of managers; and finally there is ‘motivation by external rewards: students are motivated by grades not learning which corresponds to being motivated by wages, not the joy of the job.
Marxists also argue that schools reproduce class inequality . In school, the middle classes use their material and cultural capital to ensure that their children get into the best schools and the top sets. This means that the wealthier pupils tend to get the best education and then go onto to get middle class jobs. Meanwhile working class children are more likely to get a poorer standard of education and end up in working class jobs. In this way class inequality is reproduced
Fourthly, schools legitimate class inequality . Marxists argue that in reality class background and money determines how good an education you get, but people do not realize this because schools spread the ‘myth of meritocracy’ – in school we learn that we all have an equal chance to succeed and that our grades depend on our effort and ability. Thus if we fail, we believe it is our own fault. This legitimates or justifies the system because we think it is fair when in reality it is not.
Finally , Paul Willi’s classic study Learning to Labour (1977) criticises aspects of Traditional Marxist theory.
Willis’ visited one school and observed 12 working class rebellious boys about their attitude to school and attitudes to future work. Willis described the friendship between these 12 boys (or the lads) as a counter-school culture. They attached no value to academic work, more to ‘having a laff’ and that the objective of school was to miss as many lessons as possible.
Willis argued that pupils rebelling are evidence that not all pupils are brainwashed into being passive, subordinate people as a result of the hidden curriculum. Willis therefore criticizes Traditional Marxism. These pupils also realise that they have no real opportunity to succeed in this system, so they are clearly not under ideological control.
However, the fact that the lads saw manual work as ‘proper work’ and placed no value of academic work, they all ended up failing their exams, and as a result had no choice but to go into low-paid manual work, and the end result of their active rebellion against the school was still the reproduction of class inequality. Thus this aspect of Marxism is supported by Willis’ work.
Evaluating the Marxist Perspective on Education
Traditional Marxist views of education are extremely dated, even the the new ‘Neo-Marxist’ theory of Willis is 40 years old, but how relevant are they today?
To criticise the idea of the Ideological State Apparatus, Henry Giroux, says the theory is too deterministic. He argues that working class pupils are not entirely molded by the capitalist system, and do not accept everything that they are taught. Also, education can actually harm the Bourgeois – many left wing, Marxist activists are university educated, so clearly they do not control the whole of the education system.
However, the recent academisation programme, which involves part-privatisation of state schools suggests support for the idea that Businesses control some aspects of education.
It is also quite easy to criticise the idea of the correspondence principle – Schools clearly do not inject a sense of passive obedience into today’s students – many jobs do not require a passive and obedient workforce, but require an active and creative workforce.
However, if you look at the world’s largest education system, China, this could be seen as supporting evidence for the idea of the correspondence principle at work – many of those children will go into manufacturing, as China is the world’s main manufacturing country in the era of globalisation.
The Marxist Theory of the reproduction of class inequality and its legitimation through the myth of meritocracy does actually seem to be true today. There is a persistent correlation between social class background and educational achievement – with the middle classes able to take advantage of their material and cultural capital to give their children a head start and then better grades and jobs. It is also the case that children are not taught about this unfairness in schools, although a small handful do learn about it in Sociology classes.
In conclusion , while Marxist theory might be dated, all of the four major ideas still seem to have some relevance, especially their ideas about the reproduction and legitimation of class inequality, so I would say Marxism is one of the more accurate perspectives which helps us understand the role of the education system today, both nationally and globally.
Signposting and Related Posts
This essay was written as a top band answer for a 30 mark question which might appear in the education section of the AQA’s A-level sociology 7192/1 exam paper: Education with Theory and Methods.
For more essay plans please see this main post of links….. ‘ sociology revision and exam advice ‘… all tailored towards AQA A level sociology.
You can find more essay advice on my essays and exam page !
The full knowledge post relevant to the above essay is here:
The Marxist Perspective on the Role of Education in Society
Please click here to return to the homepage – ReviseSociology.com
Share this:
- Share on Tumblr
4 thoughts on “Evaluate the Marxist View of the Role of Education in Society”
- Pingback: What Is the Role of Education in the Society? A Marxist Perspective! - Learningneverstops
- Pingback: Perspectives on the Role of Education – Knowledge Check- List – ReviseSociology
- Pingback: The Marxist Perspective on Education | ReviseSociology
- Pingback: Evaluating the Marxist Perspective on Education | ReviseSociology
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .
Discover more from ReviseSociology
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Continue reading
- Subject List
- Take a Tour
- For Authors
- Subscriber Services
- Publications
- African American Studies
- African Studies
- American Literature
- Anthropology
- Architecture Planning and Preservation
- Art History
- Atlantic History
- Biblical Studies
- British and Irish Literature
- Childhood Studies
- Chinese Studies
- Cinema and Media Studies
- Communication
- Criminology
- Environmental Science
- Evolutionary Biology
- International Law
- International Relations
- Islamic Studies
- Jewish Studies
- Latin American Studies
- Latino Studies
- Linguistics
- Literary and Critical Theory
- Medieval Studies
- Military History
- Political Science
- Public Health
- Renaissance and Reformation
- Social Work
- Urban Studies
- Victorian Literature
- Browse All Subjects
How to Subscribe
- Free Trials
In This Article Expand or collapse the "in this article" section Marxist Sociology
Introduction, general overviews.
- Key Writings of Marx and Engels for Sociologists
- Classical Marxism After Marx
- Western Marxism
- The New Marxist Historiography
- Structuralist Marxism
- Marxist Political Economy
- Marxism in the Less Developed World
- Marxist Feminism
- Marxian Class Structure and Analysis
- Marxism and Political Sociology
- Marxism and the Sociology of Work
- Globalization and International Political Economy
- Marxism and Culture
- Marxism and Urban Studies
- Post-Marxism
- Analytical Marxism
- Utopian Radical Marxism
- Reassessing the Socialist Experience
Related Articles Expand or collapse the "related articles" section about
About related articles close popup.
Lorem Ipsum Sit Dolor Amet
Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Aliquam ligula odio, euismod ut aliquam et, vestibulum nec risus. Nulla viverra, arcu et iaculis consequat, justo diam ornare tellus, semper ultrices tellus nunc eu tellus.
- Daniel Bell
- Georg Simmel
- Political Sociology
- Revolutions
- Social Darwinism
- Social Stratification
- Social Theory
Other Subject Areas
Forthcoming articles expand or collapse the "forthcoming articles" section.
- Global Racial Formations
- Transition to Parenthood in the Life Course
- Find more forthcoming articles...
- Export Citations
- Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Marxist Sociology by Michael McCarthy , Jeff Manza LAST REVIEWED: 27 July 2011 LAST MODIFIED: 27 July 2011 DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756384-0032
Karl Marx (b. 1818–d. 1883) and his lifelong collaborator Friedrich Engels (b. 1820–d. 1895) developed a body of thought that would inspire major social movements, initiate revolutionary social change across the globe, and provide the foundation for many socialist or communist governments. More recently, Marxism’s political influence has waned, with most of the formerly communist regimes undergoing significant change. It is important, however, to separate out Marxism as a system of ideas in the social sciences from Marxism as a political ideology and the foundation for revolutionary social movements and as a governing philosophy. Marxist ideas have influenced many fields of thought and indeed have played a particularly important role in the development of the discipline of sociology. Classical sociological theorists such as Émile Durkheim (b. 1858–d. 1917) and Max Weber (b. 1864–d. 1920), for example, developed their theories of society in conversation with the works of Karl Marx. However, as it evolved in the United States and western Europe in the middle parts of the 20th century, sociology’s dialogue with Marxian propositions declined. For example, the widely influential norm-oriented functionalist sociology of Talcott Parsons (b. 1902–d. 1979) had little engagement with Marxist thought. In the aftermath of the large-scale social struggles of the 1960s and 1970s, however, sociologists around the world increasingly embraced a historically oriented approach to knowledge and in many cases found in the classics of Marxism a source of inspiration. Debates and controversies over Marxism continue to shape the development of sociology up to the present time, although “neo-Marxism” is less influential today than it was twenty-five years ago. Nonetheless, serious students of sociology have to have some familiarity with some of the classical ideas and theorists of Marxism, and Marxist theories continue to influence some parts of the discipline today.
It is hardly surprising, given its historical significance, that hundreds of general overviews of Marxism have been written. As a body of thought and a political movement, Marxism can be synthesized from many points of view. McLellan 1974 offers an ideal introduction through an examination of the life and ideas of Marx himself. Draper 1977 and Draper 1978 focus more squarely on the relationship between Marxism and politics. In the case of Marxist sociology, Bottomore 1984 provides a historical analysis of the relationship between Marxism and sociology. Lefebvre 1968 ’s contribution provides a more advanced introduction. Mandel 1970 is a good place to start for students interested in Marxist economic theory (which is shaped by sociological insights far more than its neoclassical competitors). Foley 1986 develops more formalized models for understanding the basic contributions of Marx’s political economy. Finally, Ollman 1976 offers an excellent overview of Marx’s philosophical concept of alienation.
Bottomore, Tom. 1984. Sociology and socialism . New York: St. Martin’s Press.
A collection of essays that examine the historical relationship of Marxist theory to sociological thought, highlighting in particular the ways in which the growth of sociology has reflected an ongoing dialogue with Marxism.
Draper, Hal. 1977. Karl Marx’s theory of revolution . Vol. 1, State and bureaucracy . New York: Monthly Review Press.
This is a thorough, wide-ranging, and easy-to-comprehend exegesis of Marx and Engels’ writings on democracy and their approach to politics. It is part of a five-volume collection on a range of central concepts and debates in Marxian theory.
Draper, Hal. 1978. Karl Marx’s theory of revolution . Vol. 2, The politics of social classes . New York: Monthly Review Press.
This excellent follow-up to Volume 1 continues with a clear and wide-ranging exegesis of Marx and Engels, focused squarely on the question of social class—the class structure, classes in history, and classes and revolution.
Foley, Duncan K. 1986. Understanding capital: Marx’s economic theory . Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
This clear and short book reviews the core contributions of all three volumes of Marx’s major economic treatise, Capital . This is a very useful resource for those who engage with Marx’s political economy.
Lefebvre, Henri. 1968. The sociology of Marx . New York: Pantheon.
Seeks to uncover the systematic contributions to sociology in the writings of Karl Marx, including Marx’s contributions to social theory, the sociology of knowledge, political sociology, and class analysis. Originally published in French in 1966.
Mandel, Ernest. 1970. An introduction to Marxist economic theory . New York: Pathfinder.
This short book offers a concise exploration of the basic concepts in Marx’s political economy.
McLellan, David. 1974. Karl Marx: His life and thought . London: Harper & Row.
This is a key biography of Marx, situating his core theoretical contributions in his social and intellectual milieu.
Ollman, Bertell. 1976. Alienation: Marx’s conception of man in a capitalist society. 2d ed. Cambridge Studies in the History and Theory of Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
This is the most thorough exploration of Marx’s concept of alienation—the condition of human beings in capitalist society—in the English language.
back to top
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login .
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here .
- About Sociology »
- Meet the Editorial Board »
- Actor-Network Theory
- Adolescence
- African Americans
- African Societies
- Agent-Based Modeling
- Analysis, Spatial
- Analysis, World-Systems
- Anomie and Strain Theory
- Arab Spring, Mobilization, and Contentious Politics in the...
- Asian Americans
- Assimilation
- Authority and Work
- Bell, Daniel
- Biosociology
- Bourdieu, Pierre
- Catholicism
- Causal Inference
- Chicago School of Sociology
- Chinese Cultural Revolution
- Chinese Society
- Citizenship
- Civil Rights
- Civil Society
- Cognitive Sociology
- Cohort Analysis
- Collective Efficacy
- Collective Memory
- Comparative Historical Sociology
- Comte, Auguste
- Conflict Theory
- Conservatism
- Consumer Credit and Debt
- Consumer Culture
- Consumption
- Contemporary Family Issues
- Contingent Work
- Conversation Analysis
- Corrections
- Cosmopolitanism
- Crime, Cities and
- Cultural Capital
- Cultural Classification and Codes
- Cultural Economy
- Cultural Omnivorousness
- Cultural Production and Circulation
- Culture and Networks
- Culture, Sociology of
- Development
- Discrimination
- Doing Gender
- Du Bois, W.E.B.
- Durkheim, Émile
- Economic Globalization
- Economic Institutions and Institutional Change
- Economic Sociology
- Education and Health
- Education Policy in the United States
- Educational Policy and Race
- Empires and Colonialism
- Entrepreneurship
- Environmental Sociology
- Epistemology
- Ethnic Enclaves
- Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis
- Exchange Theory
- Families, Postmodern
- Family Policies
- Feminist Theory
- Field, Bourdieu's Concept of
- Forced Migration
- Foucault, Michel
- Frankfurt School
- Gender and Bodies
- Gender and Crime
- Gender and Education
- Gender and Health
- Gender and Incarceration
- Gender and Professions
- Gender and Social Movements
- Gender and Work
- Gender Pay Gap
- Gender, Sexuality, and Migration
- Gender Stratification
- Gender, Welfare Policy and
- Gendered Sexuality
- Gentrification
- Gerontology
- Global Inequalities
- Globalization and Labor
- Goffman, Erving
- Historic Preservation
- Human Trafficking
- Immigration
- Indian Society, Contemporary
- Institutions
- Intellectuals
- Intersectionalities
- Interview Methodology
- Job Quality
- Knowledge, Critical Sociology of
- Labor Markets
- Latino/Latina Studies
- Law and Society
- Law, Sociology of
- LGBT Parenting and Family Formation
- LGBT Social Movements
- Life Course
- Lipset, S.M.
- Markets, Conventions and Categories in
- Marriage and Divorce
- Marxist Sociology
- Masculinity
- Mass Incarceration in the United States and its Collateral...
- Material Culture
- Mathematical Sociology
- Medical Sociology
- Mental Illness
- Methodological Individualism
- Middle Classes
- Military Sociology
- Money and Credit
- Multiculturalism
- Multilevel Models
- Multiracial, Mixed-Race, and Biracial Identities
- Nationalism
- Non-normative Sexuality Studies
- Occupations and Professions
- Organizations
- Panel Studies
- Parsons, Talcott
- Political Culture
- Political Economy
- Popular Culture
- Proletariat (Working Class)
- Protestantism
- Public Opinion
- Public Space
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)
- Race and Sexuality
- Race and Violence
- Race and Youth
- Race in Global Perspective
- Race, Organizations, and Movements
- Rational Choice
- Relationships
- Religion and the Public Sphere
- Residential Segregation
- Role Theory
- Rural Sociology
- Scientific Networks
- Secularization
- Sequence Analysis
- Sex versus Gender
- Sexual Identity
- Sexualities
- Sexuality Across the Life Course
- Simmel, Georg
- Single Parents in Context
- Small Cities
- Social Capital
- Social Change
- Social Closure
- Social Construction of Crime
- Social Control
- Social Disorganization Theory
- Social Epidemiology
- Social History
- Social Indicators
- Social Mobility
- Social Movements
- Social Network Analysis
- Social Networks
- Social Policy
- Social Problems
- Social Psychology
- Socialization, Sociological Perspectives on
- Sociolinguistics
- Sociological Approaches to Character
- Sociological Research on the Chinese Society
- Sociological Research, Qualitative Methods in
- Sociological Research, Quantitative Methods in
- Sociology, History of
- Sociology of Manners
- Sociology of Music
- Sociology of War, The
- Suburbanism
- Survey Methods
- Symbolic Boundaries
- Symbolic Interactionism
- The Division of Labor after Durkheim
- Tilly, Charles
- Time Use and Childcare
- Time Use and Time Diary Research
- Tourism, Sociology of
- Transnational Adoption
- Unions and Inequality
- Urban Ethnography
- Urban Growth Machine
- Urban Inequality in the United States
- Veblen, Thorstein
- Visual Arts, Music, and Aesthetic Experience
- Wallerstein, Immanuel
- Welfare, Race, and the American Imagination
- Welfare States
- Women’s Employment and Economic Inequality Between Househo...
- Work and Employment, Sociology of
- Work/Life Balance
- Workplace Flexibility
- Privacy Policy
- Cookie Policy
- Legal Notice
- Accessibility
Powered by:
- [66.249.64.20|162.248.224.4]
- 162.248.224.4
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Karl Marx is one of the most prominent and influential figures in sociological theory. These ideas on conflict theory have given rise to different conflict theories, such as race-conflict theory, gender-conflict theory, and …
Karl Marx and Louis Althusser are Modernist, Structural Conflict Theorists while Antonio Gramsci is a Humanist Conflict Theorist. Marxism for A Level Sociology. Karl Marx: Key Ideas. Two classes – Bourgeois – Proletariat. …
One of the most critical components of this framework is the concept of the superstructure. This essay explores the superstructure in Marxism, examining its definition, …
Sociological Theory: An Introduction to Marxism. By Damian E M Milton. One of the most complicated theories in Sociology is the ‘Conflict theory’ of Marxism. A conflict theory (unlike a …
Introduction. An obvious classic, Karl Marx has been canonized as well as condemned. He deserves to be honoured as a radical and controversial contributor to the social sciences. Marx was fiercely (and furiously) politically …
In sociology, the Marxist view of social class provides a critical analysis of the hierarchical structure of society and the role that social class plays in shaping individuals’ lives. Developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, …
An essay evaluating the Marxist view of education covering ideological state apparatus, correspondence principle, the reproduction and legitimation of class inequality.
A collection of essays that examine the historical relationship of Marxist theory to sociological thought, highlighting in particular the ways in which the growth of sociology has …