doing your literature review jesson pdf

We’re fighting to restore access to 500,000+ books in court this week. Join us!

Internet Archive Audio

• This Just In
• Grateful Dead
• Old Time Radio
• 78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings
• Audio Books & Poetry
• Computers, Technology and Science
• Music, Arts & Culture
• News & Public Affairs
• Spirituality & Religion
• Radio News Archive

• Flickr Commons
• Occupy Wall Street Flickr
• NASA Images
• Solar System Collection
• Ames Research Center

• All Software
• Old School Emulation
• MS-DOS Games
• Historical Software
• Classic PC Games
• Software Library
• Kodi Archive and Support File
• Vintage Software
• CD-ROM Software
• CD-ROM Software Library
• Software Sites
• Tucows Software Library
• Shareware CD-ROMs
• Software Capsules Compilation
• CD-ROM Images
• ZX Spectrum
• DOOM Level CD

• Smithsonian Libraries
• FEDLINK (US)
• Lincoln Collection
• American Libraries
• Canadian Libraries
• Universal Library
• Project Gutenberg
• Children's Library
• Biodiversity Heritage Library
• Books by Language
• Additional Collections

• Prelinger Archives
• Democracy Now!
• Occupy Wall Street
• TV NSA Clip Library
• Animation & Cartoons
• Arts & Music
• Computers & Technology
• Cultural & Academic Films
• Ephemeral Films
• Sports Videos
• Videogame Videos
• Youth Media

Search the history of over 866 billion web pages on the Internet.

Mobile Apps

• Wayback Machine (iOS)
• Wayback Machine (Android)

Browser Extensions

Archive-it subscription.

• Explore the Collections
• Build Collections

Save Page Now

Capture a web page as it appears now for use as a trusted citation in the future.

Please enter a valid web address

• Donate Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape

Doing your literature Review : traditional and systematic techniques

Bookreader item preview, share or embed this item, flag this item for.

• Graphic Violence
• Explicit Sexual Content
• Hate Speech
• Misinformation/Disinformation
• Marketing/Phishing/Advertising
• Misleading/Inaccurate/Missing Metadata

plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews

5 Favorites

Better World Books

DOWNLOAD OPTIONS

No suitable files to display here.

IN COLLECTIONS

Uploaded by station35.cebu on August 9, 2020

SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata)

• Find My Rep

You are here

Doing Your Literature Review Traditional and Systematic Techniques

• Jill Jesson - Aston University, UK
• Lydia Matheson - Aston University, UK
• Fiona M Lacey - Aston University, UK
• Description
•  using libraries and the internet
•  note making
•  presentation
•  critical analysis
•  referencing, plagiarism and copyright.

This book will be relevant to students from any discipline. It includes contributions from two lecturers who have many years experience of teaching research methods and the supervision of postgraduate research dissertations and a librarian, each offering expert advice on either the creation and assessment of literature reviews or the process of searching for information. The book also highlights the increasing importance for many disciplines of the systematic review methodology and discusses some of the specific challenges which it brings.

Jill K. Jesson has worked with multi-disciplinary research teams within the Aston School of Pharmacy, Aston Business School and with M-E-L Research, an independent public services research consultancy. She has now left Aston University and is working as a Consultant.

Lydia Matheson is an Information Specialist working for Library & Information Services at Aston University.

Fiona M. Lacey is an academic pharmacist, a member of the pharmacy practice teaching group in the School of Pharmacy, and Associate Dean in the School of Life and Health Sciences at Aston.

'Tasks, tips, examples, figures and summaries in each chapter give the book a "self-guided" feel appropriate in a textbook, and the language is rarely arcane. Four useful appendices and a fine index complete the work. Overall, this is a sound guide for the absolute neophyte in how to create useable literature reviews. Part 2 is especially recommended as a good discussion of the ways and means of writing reviews. The work is useful for students at most levels, and for those who teach research methods and want a clear guide for literature reviews for their reading lists' - G. E. Gorman Online Information Review

'The main strength lies in the book's practical nature. The authors place great emphasis on the importance of proper searching techniques and encourage the use of specialist librarians. Chapters on reading and note-taking skills contain useful detail often missing from similar books - such as which bits of an article to read first, and how to make and store relevant notes that will be usable later. The examples of how to improve specific passages of writing are very valuable.'

The book does what it promises: it is an accessible and practical book, which many researchers can benefit from to improve their literature reviews.

Fantastic resource for students entering the research phase

I find this title very rewarding to use both for the tutor and a student. It's suitable for understanding demands of a proper literature review, traditional or more systematic one.

Covers something all students need to think about across the course of the MA, and does so with a good level of clarity. Every step of getting on with a literature review is covered, and there's a good step-by-step approach to a lot of it.

The discussion of different types and purposes of 'traditional' literature review is likely to be a useful prop early on in a research skills module.

Essential for doing literature review

The book is recommended to students who have to write a literature review within their paper. Especially for writing their thesis (BSc).

This book provides an up to date overview of tackling literature reviews. Ideal for all researchers but maybe particularly useful for final year under-graduates and Masters students working on research projects and dissertations.

Thorough and accessible text supporting students working towards research.

Preview this book

Sample materials & chapters, for instructors.

Please select a format:

Select a Purchasing Option

Order from:.

• VitalSource
• Amazon Kindle
• Google Play

Related Products

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Doing your literature review: traditional and systematic techniques

2011, Evaluation & Research in Education

Related Papers

Zorica Patel

Lorraine Ling

The title of this book refers to both methods and paradigms in education research. Both are addressed, but this book is distinguished from others in that the research paradigm, rather than choice of research method, is placed front of stage. The related field of study is education. The study of education intertwines with a range of disciplines in the social sciences so the research issues arising have implications beyond the education context. The research paradigms addressed in this book include the traditional positivist and post-positivist—here labelled neo-positivist—paradigms. The interpretivist, transformative and pragmatic research paradigms, which have also been nominated in existing literature, are included. A novel supercomplexity paradigm has been added here in acknowledgement of the “supercomplex” environment (Barnett, 2000a) in which education research now operates. Following chapters explore issues relating to the design, implementation and critique of education resear...

Saravanan Muthukrishnan

British Educational Research Journal

Steve Brigley

Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning

Barbara Humberstone

Tariq Elyas

The current paper attempts to discuss some of the fundamental issues in educational research with the aim to offer a lucid narrative for the fresh and less experienced researchers in the field. It critically reviews literature on research paradigms, delineates the differences between Interpretive, Positivist and Critical paradigms, and explains their ontological and epistemological stances. It also precisely defines and examines different research methodologies, approaches and methods. It underscores that we should be careful in the choice our research paradigm and design our studies accordingly. While encouraging a flexible approach in the choice of research methods or mixing of methods, it argues that ontological and epistemological beliefs do not prevent a qualitative researcher from utilizing data collection methods typically used in quantitative research approach. Hence choice of any research method(s) should not be interpreted as an indicator of an ontological or epistemologic...

abida sheikh

This article traces the underlying theoretical framework of educational research. It outlines the definitions of epistemology, ontology and paradigm and the origins, main tenets, and key thinkers of the 3 paradigms; positivist, interpetivist and critical. By closely analyzing each paradigm, the literature review focuses on the ontological and epistemological assumptions of each paradigm. Finally the author analyzes not only the paradigm's weakness but also the author's own construct of reality and knowledge which align with the critical paradigm. The English Language Teaching (ELT) field has moved from an ad hoc field with amateurish research to a much more serious enterprise of professionalism. More teachers are conducting research to not only inform their teaching in the classroom but also to bridge the gap between the external researcher dictating policy and the teacher negotiating that policy with the practical demands of their classroom. I was a layperson, not an educational researcher. Determined to emancipate myself from my layperson identity, I began to analyze the different philosophical underpinnings of each paradigm, reading about the great thinkers' theories and the evolution of social science research. Through this process I began to examine how I view the world, thus realizing my own construction of knowledge and social reality, which is actually quite loose and chaotic. Most importantly, I realized that I identify most with the critical paradigm assumptions and that my future desired role as an educational researcher is to affect change and challenge dominant social and political discourses in ELT. The following literature review is the product of my transformation from teacher to educational researcher. I will begin by defining the operational definitions of ontology, epistemology and paradigm. Then, I trace the origins, main tenets, and key thinkers of the 3 paradigms; positivist, interpetivist and critical, focusing on the ontological and epistemological assumptions of each paradigm. Through this analysis of different paradigms, I will expose not only each paradigm's weakness but also my own construct of reality and knowledge.

Jhon Jairo Mosquera Rodas

The document presents the analysis and assessment of the paradigms through which educational research can be supported. It provides a rationale for why the researcher clearly defines the paradigm(s) of his/her study, considering the relevance and usefulness of these paradigms in the research process. Focusing on why it is essential to recognize the specificity of the levels of analysis - ethical, epistemological, methodological or axiological, in this type of research? This necessarily presents a complex picture, in relation to its object of study, and its position in the current science system.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques

• J. Jesson , L. Matheson , Fiona M. Lacey
• Published 11 February 2011

736 Citations

The science of literature reviews: searching, identifying, selecting, and synthesising, reviewing the animal literature: how to describe and choose between different types of literature reviews, sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management research.

• Highly Influenced
• 11 Excerpts

A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews

Literature reviews, citations and intertextuality in graduate student writing, the state of research on folksonomies in the field of library and information science : a systematic literature review, literature reviews of qualitative accounting research: challenges and opportunities, digital content management: systematic review, re-examining systematic literature review in management research: additional benefits and execution protocols, many paths to discovery: the increasingly complex literature maze, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

•  Sign into My Research
•  Create My Research Account
• Company Website
• Our Products
• About Dissertations
• Español (España)
• Support Center

Select language

• Bahasa Indonesia
• Português (Brasil)
• Português (Portugal)

Welcome to My Research!

You may have access to the free features available through My Research. You can save searches, save documents, create alerts and more. Please log in through your library or institution to check if you have access.

Translate this article into 20 different languages!

If you log in through your library or institution you might have access to this article in multiple languages.

Get access to 20+ different citations styles

Styles include MLA, APA, Chicago and many more. This feature may be available for free if you log in through your library or institution.

Looking for a PDF of this document?

You may have access to it for free by logging in through your library or institution.

Want to save this document?

You may have access to different export options including Google Drive and Microsoft OneDrive and citation management tools like RefWorks and EasyBib. Try logging in through your library or institution to get access to these tools.

• Document 1 of 1
• More like this
• Scholarly Journal

Doing Your Literature Review. Traditional and Systematic Techniques

No items selected.

Please select one or more items.

Select results items first to use the cite, email, save, and export options

Jesson, J.K., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M., Doing Your Literature Review. Traditional and Systematic Techniques, London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2011, 192 p.

Doing Your Literature Review. Traditional and Systematic Techniques, as suggested by the authors, is intended to be "a practical study guide" for anyone who wants to learn or to improve their way of reviewing mainly scientific literature. The main contribution of this book is that it presents different models of literature review used to this day; however, its emphasis falls on describing the latest methods and techniques. In the last 20 to 25 years, the advancement of technology and the extensive use of the Internet have changed the way literature review is done. The book also explains the difference between traditional literature review and the more exact, more scientific systematic model. In order to come to the aid of the readers, the authors present and explain methods that should be used for producing a good literature review, from reading, note-taking and writing, to the methodology of making a meta-analysis.

The authors of the book come from different academic fields, and their experience is used for creating a methodology for literature review that may be used in all sciences. Jill K. Jesson has worked with multi-disciplinary research teams, and her publications cover community pharmacy practice, public health and social care. Her main contribution in the present paper covers issues about traditional and systematic literature review. Lydia Matheson is an information specialist working for Library and Information Services at Aston University. Her professional expertise was used in the chapters that focus on searching for information and the use of traditional printed sources of relevant contents, as well as the use of modern electronic databases. Fiona M. Lacey is an academic pharmacist, who teaches research methods as Associate Dean in the School of Life and Health Sciences at Aston and her contribution relate to the topics of multidisciplinary research, systematic review and meta-analysis.

The introduction focuses on presenting the authors as well as the objectives and the overall features of the volume. The book is divided in two parts, with chapters focusing on specific issues. The volume starts with the conceptualization of the terms to be used; it gradually presents techniques of searching for information, reading skills, taking notes and writing; it then proceeds to describe the traditional and systematic types of review. The volume ends with the analysis of the meta-analysis model, as well as issues related to referencing and plagiarism. By taking the topics gradually, the authors make it easy for readers to understand, and maintain their interest.

The book is structured in two parts. The first part - "Getting information" - has 4 chapters - "Preliminaries", "Searching for information", "Reading skills" and "From making notes to writing" - which provides a general introduction to literature review, finding and evaluating information.

The second part - "Using information" - provides detailed methods about how traditional, systematic and meta-analysis review should be done in the 5 chapters it contains, namely "The traditional review", "Writing up your review", "The systematic review", "Meta-analysis" and "Referencing and plagiarism".

In the "Preliminaries" chapter, the authors focus on explaining the concepts and the terminology used throughout the book. Recognizing and distinguishing between traditional and systematic review is also described briefly in this chapter, as well as different review designs such as the conceptual, the state-of-the-art and the expert type. In the project management section, the reader can find useful methods of planning for a literature review.

In the second chapter "Searching for information", the methodology for identifying the relevant sources of information is presented. All the steps that must be taken in order to create a bibliographic database are described in this section, from finding the available information sources to identifying the keywords to elaborate further complex search, to methods of organizing and record-keeping of the results. The suggested methods are mostly modern ways of fulfilling the task of searching for information such as the ISI Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, Ebsco, digital libraries, and online journals.

The chapter about Reading skills begins with the planning of the time allocated for doing a literature review and the proposal of using a Gantt chart. In this part of the book, the reader will find useful methods and techniques for reading the literature that is important for their research. For a systematic approach, the authors suggest the use of one of these three methods: the scan, skim and understand, EECA (Examine, Evaluate, Establish, Compare, Argue) and SQ3R (Survey, Question, Read, Recall and Review). Literature sources are debated in this section, making difference between scientific literature and gray literature.

The last chapter of the first part, is about making notes and writing. This part focuses on some protocols for the process of taking notes and writing papers based on the literature that was prior reviewed. In conclusion, the manner in which the end paper will look depends on the way previous steps were undertaken.

The traditional review is intended to explore issues, develop ideas and identify research gaps. The main characteristic of the traditional review, and also the difference compared to the systematic research, is that it hasn't got a specific methodological approach. Different types of traditional review are described in this chapter: conceptual, state-of-the-art, expert and scoping method. When analyzing traditional literature, the reader must be aware of the fact that the paper could be written in a subjective manner, and thereby be biased. The reasons for undertaking a traditional review is that it is flexible, it allows the reader to use different types of evidence, and it constitutes the first step in endeavoring in a systematic style review. The chapter about writing a review is focused around the framework of such a paper. The authors describe the methods that should be used in writing a scientific paper, and the manner in which its parts (the abstract, the executive summary, annotated bibliography and content) must be constructed.

The systematic review uses a standardized, structured, protocol-driven methodology, and it requires an exhaustive search for all the relevant literature. This kind of work is usually undertaken by experienced researchers, and is typically restricted to published, peer-reviewed academic work. Being a type of review with a strict protocol, the authors explain all the phases that should be covered in the attempt of making a systematic review. The more precise meta-analysis is a statistical technique used to combine data from different published sources in the attempt to obtain an estimated overall perspective on a specific issue. The difference in making a meta-analysis, in comparison with the systematic review, is that the literature sources must be academic and the variables analyzed t homogeneous.

The last chapter provides guidance on how to create references in the traditional manner and/or using reference management software, and on the way a paper should be written in order to avoid plagiarism. The authors present the most widely used systems of referencing like the Harvard, Vancouver, Oxford, APA, MLA and OSCOLA. Referenced authors found in the bibliographic section of all the scientific published papers could become important research tracks to follow if they are in the reader's field of interest.

This book is intended to come to the aid of students and researchers that work in the academic field and guide them through the production of either a traditional or a systematic literature review by giving practical advices. An important feature of this volume is that it is addressed to and can be used by researches from any discipline, and it also presents the latest methods used in searching for information and reference management.

Petru Adrian Pop

University of Oradea

Acknowledgement: This paper is made and published under the aegis of the Research Institute for Quality of Life, Romanian Academy as a part of programme co-funded by the European Union within the Operational Sectorial Programme for Human Resources Development through the project for Pluri and interdisciplinary in doctoral and post-doctoral programmes Project Code: POSDRU/159/1.5/S/141086

You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer

Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer

Copyright University of Oradea Publishing House (Editura Universitatii din Oradea) Jul 2015

In order to come to the aid of the readers, the authors present and explain methods that should be used for producing a good literature review, from reading, note-taking and writing, to the methodology of making a meta-analysis. [...]the manner in which the end paper will look depends on the way previous steps were undertaken.

Suggested sources

• About ProQuest
• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy

(Stanford users can avoid this Captcha by logging in.)

• Send to text email RefWorks EndNote printer

Doing your literature review : traditional and systematic techniques

Available online, at the library.

Green Library

More options

• Find it at other libraries via WorldCat
• Contributors

Description

Creators/contributors, contents/summary.

• Introduction Who is this book for? How is this book different? The rationale and history behind the contributions from a researcher and from an information specialist Features of the book Layout of the book PART ONE: GETTING INFORMATION Preliminaries What is a literature review? Terminology used in this book Different styles of review Two styles or approaches A critical approach Knowledge and literature Why and when will you need to review the literature? The research question and the literature review What is appropriate literature? Choosing which style of review: a traditional narrative review or a systematic review Project management Searching for Information Introduction Develop online searches by identifying key words and creating a search record The range of information sources available for complex searches. What do you need from a resource to make it appropriate for locating journal articles for your review? Reading Skills Introduction Be analytical in your reading Where to start Reading techniques - scan, skim and understand Reading different types of material Grey literature: non academic sources and policy reports Recording and note making From Making Notes to Writing Introduction Note-making From notes to writing Writing - critical writing and types of argument Making a value judgment and bias PART TWO: USING INFORMATION The Traditional Review
• Overview of the debate Types of review: critical, conceptual state of the art, expert and scoping Draw up an analytical framework - how to sort the material Moving to analysis and synthesis The presentation of your review Summarizing the gap - dare to have an opinion. Writing up Your Review Overview A short summary A self-standing review
• Abstract, executive summary and annotated bibliography Writing the review Key words or phrases to help you move from stage 1 to stage 2 The 'so what' question, originality and making a value judgment The Systematic Review Overview Definitions Development of the review protocol Formulating the review question Documenting your progress Locating studies and sources of information Selecting studies: inclusion and exclusion criteria Appraisal - assessing the quality of research Data extraction Synthesis, drawing conclusions, what the review shows Evolving formats of systematic review Meta- Analysis Overview What is meta-analysis? Can I use meta-analysis to summarise the results of my systematic review? Undertaking your meta-analysis Displaying the results of a meta-analysis Is your meta-analysis free from bias? Performing a sensitivity analysis Referencing and Plagiarism Introduction Why is referencing important? What do you need to reference? How many references should I provide? When and how to reference Referencing systems Where to find citation information you need Plagiarism Copyright Conclusion Summary Appendices Appendix 1: Further reading Appendix 2: Critical review checklist Appendix 3: Systematic review online resources Appendix 4: Resources for meta-analysis Glossary.
• (source: Nielsen Book Data)

Bibliographic information

Browse related items.

• Stanford Home
• Maps & Directions
• Search Stanford
• Emergency Info
• Terms of Use
• Non-Discrimination
• Accessibility

© Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 .

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Doing Your Literature Review - Traditional and Systematic Techniques Jill K Jesson Doing Your Literature Review - Traditional and Systematic Techniques , Lydia Matheson Fiona M Lacey £20.99 192pp 9781848601543 1848601549 [Formula: see text]

Affiliation.

• 1 The children's charity the NSPCC (seconded from the University of Dundee).
• PMID: 27712345
• DOI: 10.7748/nr.19.4.45.s7

A PLETHORA of books has appeared over the past few years on writing literature reviews. However this one is definitely worth a second look. Written by a social scientist, a pharmaceutical scientist and a library scientist, the authors between them have a wealth of experience and authority on the subject.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Designing and managing your research project David R Thomas and Ian D Hodges Designing and managing your research project Sage Publications £20.99 264pp 9781848601932 184860193X [Formula: see text]. [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Nurse Res. 2011 Oct 21;19(1):46. doi: 10.7748/nr.19.1.46.s2. Nurse Res. 2011. PMID: 27712352
• Designing and managing your research project Designing and managing your research project Thomas David Hodges Ian Sage Publications £20.99 264pp 9781848601932 184860193X [Formula: see text]. [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Emerg Nurse. 2011 Jun 8;19(3):9. doi: 10.7748/en.19.3.9.s2. Emerg Nurse. 2011. PMID: 27645790
• Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care A Practical Guide Second edition Helen Aveyard Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care A Practical Guide Second edition McGraw Hil / £17.99 170pp 9780335238859 0335238858 [Formula: see text]. [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Nurse Res. 2011 Jul 15;18(4):45. doi: 10.7748/nr.18.4.45.s2. Nurse Res. 2011. PMID: 27712339
• Submaximal, Perceptually Regulated Exercise Testing Predicts Maximal Oxygen Uptake: A Meta-Analysis Study. Coquart J, Tabben M, Farooq A, Tourny C, Eston R. Coquart J, et al. Sports Med. 2016 Jun;46(6):885-97. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0465-x. Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 26790419 Review.
• Collections of traditional Chinese medical literature as resources for systematic searches. May BH, Lu C, Xue CC. May BH, et al. J Altern Complement Med. 2012 Dec;18(12):1101-7. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0587. Epub 2012 Oct 12. J Altern Complement Med. 2012. PMID: 23062022 Review.
• Computer Education and Third Age Universities: A Systematic Review. Sobral SR, Sobral M. Sobral SR, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 10;18(14):7390. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147390. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34299841 Free PMC article.
• Perception, attitude, and demand for Korean medicine and Western medicine collaborative treatment of medical occupational groups in Korea: A scoping review. Leem J, Kim KI, Seo JH, Cheong MJ, Youn I. Leem J, et al. Integr Med Res. 2021 Mar;10(1):100430. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100430. Epub 2020 May 23. Integr Med Res. 2021. PMID: 32923363 Free PMC article. Review.

LinkOut - more resources

Miscellaneous.

• NCI CPTAC Assay Portal
• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

• Choose the language

• Jesson, Jill

Jesson, Jill | Lacey, Fiona M. | Matheson, Lydia Doing Your Literature Review : Traditional and Systematic Techniques 2011 - Sage Publications

Doing Your Literature Review : Traditional and Systematic Techniques

• This eBook is not available for institutional purchase.

ISBN: 9781446209899

DISCIPLINES