Advances in Space Research
Subject Area and Category
- Atmospheric Science
- Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Space and Planetary Science
- Aerospace Engineering
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
Elsevier Ltd
Publication type
02731177, 18791948
Information
How to publish in this journal
The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.
Category | Year | Quartile |
---|---|---|
Aerospace Engineering | 1999 | Q2 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2000 | Q2 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2001 | Q2 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2002 | Q2 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2003 | Q2 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2004 | Q2 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2005 | Q2 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2006 | Q1 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2007 | Q2 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2008 | Q1 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2009 | Q1 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2010 | Q1 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2011 | Q1 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2012 | Q1 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2013 | Q1 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2014 | Q1 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2015 | Q2 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2016 | Q2 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2017 | Q2 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2018 | Q2 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2019 | Q1 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2020 | Q1 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2021 | Q2 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2022 | Q2 |
Aerospace Engineering | 2023 | Q2 |
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2019 | Q2 |
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2020 | Q2 |
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2021 | Q2 |
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2022 | Q2 |
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2023 | Q2 |
Atmospheric Science | 2019 | Q3 |
Atmospheric Science | 2020 | Q3 |
Atmospheric Science | 2021 | Q3 |
Atmospheric Science | 2022 | Q3 |
Atmospheric Science | 2023 | Q2 |
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) | 2019 | Q1 |
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) | 2020 | Q2 |
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) | 2021 | Q2 |
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) | 2022 | Q2 |
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) | 2023 | Q1 |
Geophysics | 2019 | Q2 |
Geophysics | 2020 | Q2 |
Geophysics | 2021 | Q2 |
Geophysics | 2022 | Q2 |
Geophysics | 2023 | Q2 |
Space and Planetary Science | 1999 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2000 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2001 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2002 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2003 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2004 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2005 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2006 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2007 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2008 | Q2 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2009 | Q2 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2010 | Q2 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2011 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2012 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2013 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2014 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2015 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2016 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2017 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2018 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2019 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2020 | Q2 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2021 | Q3 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2022 | Q2 |
Space and Planetary Science | 2023 | Q2 |
The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.
Year | SJR |
---|---|
1999 | 0.346 |
2000 | 0.342 |
2001 | 0.255 |
2002 | 0.289 |
2003 | 0.284 |
2004 | 0.378 |
2005 | 0.471 |
2006 | 0.510 |
2007 | 0.485 |
2008 | 0.595 |
2009 | 0.653 |
2010 | 0.626 |
2011 | 0.575 |
2012 | 0.575 |
2013 | 0.657 |
2014 | 0.709 |
2015 | 0.584 |
2016 | 0.575 |
2017 | 0.569 |
2018 | 0.589 |
2019 | 0.657 |
2020 | 0.682 |
2021 | 0.613 |
2022 | 0.599 |
2023 | 0.663 |
Evolution of the number of published documents. All types of documents are considered, including citable and non citable documents.
Year | Documents |
---|---|
1999 | 548 |
2000 | 684 |
2001 | 512 |
2002 | 680 |
2003 | 715 |
2004 | 775 |
2005 | 702 |
2006 | 783 |
2007 | 518 |
2008 | 556 |
2009 | 427 |
2010 | 326 |
2011 | 448 |
2012 | 331 |
2013 | 445 |
2014 | 432 |
2015 | 525 |
2016 | 431 |
2017 | 488 |
2018 | 499 |
2019 | 516 |
2020 | 453 |
2021 | 642 |
2022 | 606 |
2023 | 819 |
This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.
Cites per document | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 1999 | 0.407 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2000 | 0.379 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2001 | 0.451 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2002 | 0.533 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2003 | 0.524 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2004 | 0.619 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2005 | 0.901 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2006 | 0.893 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2007 | 0.921 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2008 | 0.983 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2009 | 1.150 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2010 | 1.094 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2011 | 1.410 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2012 | 1.470 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2013 | 1.676 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2014 | 1.838 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2015 | 1.893 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2016 | 1.814 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2017 | 1.901 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2018 | 2.024 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2019 | 2.246 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2020 | 2.422 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2021 | 2.803 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2022 | 2.963 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2023 | 2.996 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 1999 | 0.407 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2000 | 0.395 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2001 | 0.435 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2002 | 0.526 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2003 | 0.517 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2004 | 0.676 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2005 | 0.904 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2006 | 0.958 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2007 | 0.974 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2008 | 0.956 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2009 | 1.166 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2010 | 1.191 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2011 | 1.463 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2012 | 1.494 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2013 | 1.784 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2014 | 1.835 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2015 | 1.884 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2016 | 1.790 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2017 | 1.880 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2018 | 2.108 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2019 | 2.327 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2020 | 2.572 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2021 | 2.866 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2022 | 3.064 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2023 | 3.077 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 1999 | 0.454 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2000 | 0.351 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2001 | 0.443 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2002 | 0.490 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2003 | 0.535 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2004 | 0.585 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2005 | 0.967 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2006 | 0.993 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2007 | 0.869 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2008 | 0.893 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2009 | 1.256 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2010 | 1.225 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2011 | 1.467 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2012 | 1.527 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2013 | 1.724 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2014 | 1.695 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2015 | 1.865 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2016 | 1.727 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2017 | 1.821 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2018 | 2.094 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2019 | 2.506 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2020 | 2.516 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2021 | 2.796 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2022 | 3.028 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2023 | 3.038 |
Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.
Cites | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Self Cites | 1999 | 116 |
Self Cites | 2000 | 108 |
Self Cites | 2001 | 154 |
Self Cites | 2002 | 132 |
Self Cites | 2003 | 170 |
Self Cites | 2004 | 227 |
Self Cites | 2005 | 300 |
Self Cites | 2006 | 222 |
Self Cites | 2007 | 272 |
Self Cites | 2008 | 249 |
Self Cites | 2009 | 236 |
Self Cites | 2010 | 232 |
Self Cites | 2011 | 233 |
Self Cites | 2012 | 195 |
Self Cites | 2013 | 281 |
Self Cites | 2014 | 308 |
Self Cites | 2015 | 337 |
Self Cites | 2016 | 327 |
Self Cites | 2017 | 414 |
Self Cites | 2018 | 371 |
Self Cites | 2019 | 445 |
Self Cites | 2020 | 360 |
Self Cites | 2021 | 466 |
Self Cites | 2022 | 470 |
Self Cites | 2023 | 641 |
Total Cites | 1999 | 730 |
Total Cites | 2000 | 681 |
Total Cites | 2001 | 761 |
Total Cites | 2002 | 917 |
Total Cites | 2003 | 969 |
Total Cites | 2004 | 1289 |
Total Cites | 2005 | 1961 |
Total Cites | 2006 | 2099 |
Total Cites | 2007 | 2202 |
Total Cites | 2008 | 1915 |
Total Cites | 2009 | 2165 |
Total Cites | 2010 | 1788 |
Total Cites | 2011 | 1915 |
Total Cites | 2012 | 1794 |
Total Cites | 2013 | 1971 |
Total Cites | 2014 | 2246 |
Total Cites | 2015 | 2276 |
Total Cites | 2016 | 2509 |
Total Cites | 2017 | 2610 |
Total Cites | 2018 | 3044 |
Total Cites | 2019 | 3300 |
Total Cites | 2020 | 3866 |
Total Cites | 2021 | 4208 |
Total Cites | 2022 | 4936 |
Total Cites | 2023 | 5234 |
Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.
Cites | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
External Cites per document | 1999 | 0.342 |
External Cites per document | 2000 | 0.333 |
External Cites per document | 2001 | 0.347 |
External Cites per document | 2002 | 0.450 |
External Cites per document | 2003 | 0.426 |
External Cites per document | 2004 | 0.557 |
External Cites per document | 2005 | 0.765 |
External Cites per document | 2006 | 0.856 |
External Cites per document | 2007 | 0.854 |
External Cites per document | 2008 | 0.832 |
External Cites per document | 2009 | 1.039 |
External Cites per document | 2010 | 1.037 |
External Cites per document | 2011 | 1.285 |
External Cites per document | 2012 | 1.331 |
External Cites per document | 2013 | 1.529 |
External Cites per document | 2014 | 1.583 |
External Cites per document | 2015 | 1.605 |
External Cites per document | 2016 | 1.556 |
External Cites per document | 2017 | 1.582 |
External Cites per document | 2018 | 1.851 |
External Cites per document | 2019 | 2.013 |
External Cites per document | 2020 | 2.333 |
External Cites per document | 2021 | 2.549 |
External Cites per document | 2022 | 2.772 |
External Cites per document | 2023 | 2.700 |
Cites per document | 1999 | 0.407 |
Cites per document | 2000 | 0.395 |
Cites per document | 2001 | 0.435 |
Cites per document | 2002 | 0.526 |
Cites per document | 2003 | 0.517 |
Cites per document | 2004 | 0.676 |
Cites per document | 2005 | 0.904 |
Cites per document | 2006 | 0.958 |
Cites per document | 2007 | 0.974 |
Cites per document | 2008 | 0.956 |
Cites per document | 2009 | 1.166 |
Cites per document | 2010 | 1.191 |
Cites per document | 2011 | 1.463 |
Cites per document | 2012 | 1.494 |
Cites per document | 2013 | 1.784 |
Cites per document | 2014 | 1.835 |
Cites per document | 2015 | 1.884 |
Cites per document | 2016 | 1.790 |
Cites per document | 2017 | 1.880 |
Cites per document | 2018 | 2.108 |
Cites per document | 2019 | 2.327 |
Cites per document | 2020 | 2.572 |
Cites per document | 2021 | 2.866 |
Cites per document | 2022 | 3.064 |
Cites per document | 2023 | 3.077 |
International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.
Year | International Collaboration |
---|---|
1999 | 26.82 |
2000 | 35.82 |
2001 | 31.25 |
2002 | 33.09 |
2003 | 32.31 |
2004 | 31.35 |
2005 | 38.46 |
2006 | 38.44 |
2007 | 33.78 |
2008 | 34.71 |
2009 | 34.19 |
2010 | 34.05 |
2011 | 32.81 |
2012 | 33.23 |
2013 | 34.61 |
2014 | 33.80 |
2015 | 29.71 |
2016 | 29.00 |
2017 | 29.71 |
2018 | 35.27 |
2019 | 29.84 |
2020 | 32.89 |
2021 | 31.46 |
2022 | 28.55 |
2023 | 30.89 |
Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Non-citable documents | 1999 | 7 |
Non-citable documents | 2000 | 1 |
Non-citable documents | 2001 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2002 | 1 |
Non-citable documents | 2003 | 1 |
Non-citable documents | 2004 | 2 |
Non-citable documents | 2005 | 2 |
Non-citable documents | 2006 | 27 |
Non-citable documents | 2007 | 67 |
Non-citable documents | 2008 | 69 |
Non-citable documents | 2009 | 45 |
Non-citable documents | 2010 | 5 |
Non-citable documents | 2011 | 7 |
Non-citable documents | 2012 | 12 |
Non-citable documents | 2013 | 16 |
Non-citable documents | 2014 | 19 |
Non-citable documents | 2015 | 20 |
Non-citable documents | 2016 | 22 |
Non-citable documents | 2017 | 21 |
Non-citable documents | 2018 | 20 |
Non-citable documents | 2019 | 19 |
Non-citable documents | 2020 | 20 |
Non-citable documents | 2021 | 20 |
Non-citable documents | 2022 | 21 |
Non-citable documents | 2023 | 18 |
Citable documents | 1999 | 1787 |
Citable documents | 2000 | 1721 |
Citable documents | 2001 | 1751 |
Citable documents | 2002 | 1743 |
Citable documents | 2003 | 1875 |
Citable documents | 2004 | 1905 |
Citable documents | 2005 | 2168 |
Citable documents | 2006 | 2165 |
Citable documents | 2007 | 2193 |
Citable documents | 2008 | 1934 |
Citable documents | 2009 | 1812 |
Citable documents | 2010 | 1496 |
Citable documents | 2011 | 1302 |
Citable documents | 2012 | 1189 |
Citable documents | 2013 | 1089 |
Citable documents | 2014 | 1205 |
Citable documents | 2015 | 1188 |
Citable documents | 2016 | 1380 |
Citable documents | 2017 | 1367 |
Citable documents | 2018 | 1424 |
Citable documents | 2019 | 1399 |
Citable documents | 2020 | 1483 |
Citable documents | 2021 | 1448 |
Citable documents | 2022 | 1590 |
Citable documents | 2023 | 1683 |
Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Uncited documents | 1999 | 1357 |
Uncited documents | 2000 | 1293 |
Uncited documents | 2001 | 1295 |
Uncited documents | 2002 | 1202 |
Uncited documents | 2003 | 1300 |
Uncited documents | 2004 | 1223 |
Uncited documents | 2005 | 1257 |
Uncited documents | 2006 | 1194 |
Uncited documents | 2007 | 1279 |
Uncited documents | 2008 | 1086 |
Uncited documents | 2009 | 904 |
Uncited documents | 2010 | 726 |
Uncited documents | 2011 | 563 |
Uncited documents | 2012 | 516 |
Uncited documents | 2013 | 420 |
Uncited documents | 2014 | 426 |
Uncited documents | 2015 | 394 |
Uncited documents | 2016 | 488 |
Uncited documents | 2017 | 504 |
Uncited documents | 2018 | 441 |
Uncited documents | 2019 | 396 |
Uncited documents | 2020 | 389 |
Uncited documents | 2021 | 356 |
Uncited documents | 2022 | 370 |
Uncited documents | 2023 | 378 |
Cited documents | 1999 | 437 |
Cited documents | 2000 | 429 |
Cited documents | 2001 | 456 |
Cited documents | 2002 | 542 |
Cited documents | 2003 | 576 |
Cited documents | 2004 | 684 |
Cited documents | 2005 | 913 |
Cited documents | 2006 | 998 |
Cited documents | 2007 | 981 |
Cited documents | 2008 | 917 |
Cited documents | 2009 | 953 |
Cited documents | 2010 | 775 |
Cited documents | 2011 | 746 |
Cited documents | 2012 | 685 |
Cited documents | 2013 | 685 |
Cited documents | 2014 | 798 |
Cited documents | 2015 | 814 |
Cited documents | 2016 | 914 |
Cited documents | 2017 | 884 |
Cited documents | 2018 | 1003 |
Cited documents | 2019 | 1022 |
Cited documents | 2020 | 1114 |
Cited documents | 2021 | 1112 |
Cited documents | 2022 | 1241 |
Cited documents | 2023 | 1323 |
Evolution of the percentage of female authors.
Year | Female Percent |
---|---|
1999 | 15.44 |
2000 | 16.44 |
2001 | 20.17 |
2002 | 18.09 |
2003 | 20.31 |
2004 | 19.79 |
2005 | 22.46 |
2006 | 20.75 |
2007 | 23.55 |
2008 | 22.34 |
2009 | 22.36 |
2010 | 23.60 |
2011 | 21.62 |
2012 | 26.25 |
2013 | 22.47 |
2014 | 24.98 |
2015 | 22.82 |
2016 | 23.38 |
2017 | 25.59 |
2018 | 23.73 |
2019 | 24.68 |
2020 | 25.85 |
2021 | 26.62 |
2022 | 23.30 |
2023 | 25.59 |
Evolution of the number of documents cited by public policy documents according to Overton database.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Overton | 1999 | 0 |
Overton | 2000 | 0 |
Overton | 2001 | 0 |
Overton | 2002 | 0 |
Overton | 2003 | 0 |
Overton | 2004 | 36 |
Overton | 2005 | 22 |
Overton | 2006 | 37 |
Overton | 2007 | 18 |
Overton | 2008 | 25 |
Overton | 2009 | 18 |
Overton | 2010 | 18 |
Overton | 2011 | 25 |
Overton | 2012 | 18 |
Overton | 2013 | 17 |
Overton | 2014 | 9 |
Overton | 2015 | 9 |
Overton | 2016 | 6 |
Overton | 2017 | 7 |
Overton | 2018 | 11 |
Overton | 2019 | 5 |
Overton | 2020 | 1 |
Overton | 2021 | 7 |
Overton | 2022 | 2 |
Overton | 2023 | 0 |
Evoution of the number of documents related to Sustainable Development Goals defined by United Nations. Available from 2018 onwards.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
SDG | 2018 | 42 |
SDG | 2019 | 27 |
SDG | 2020 | 34 |
SDG | 2021 | 54 |
SDG | 2022 | 62 |
SDG | 2023 | 87 |
Leave a comment
Name * Required
Email (will not be published) * Required
* Required Cancel
The users of Scimago Journal & Country Rank have the possibility to dialogue through comments linked to a specific journal. The purpose is to have a forum in which general doubts about the processes of publication in the journal, experiences and other issues derived from the publication of papers are resolved. For topics on particular articles, maintain the dialogue through the usual channels with your editor.
Follow us on @ScimagoJR Scimago Lab , Copyright 2007-2024. Data Source: Scopus®
Cookie settings
Cookie Policy
Legal Notice
Privacy Policy
Advances in Space Research - Impact Score, Ranking, SJR, h-index, Citescore, Rating, Publisher, ISSN, and Other Important Details
Published By: Elsevier Ltd.
Abbreviation: Adv. Space Res.
Impact Score The impact Score or journal impact score (JIS) is equivalent to Impact Factor. The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly mean number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal, as indexed by Clarivate's Web of Science. On the other hand, Impact Score is based on Scopus data.
Important details.
Advances in Space Research | |
Adv. Space Res. | |
Journal | |
Aerospace Engineering (Q2); Astronomy and Astrophysics (Q2); Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) (Q2); Geophysics (Q2); Space and Planetary Science (Q2); Atmospheric Science (Q3) | |
2.92 | |
0.599 | |
107 | |
8595 | |
Elsevier Ltd. | |
United Kingdom | |
02731177, 18791948 | |
1981-2022 | |
Q2 | |
(Last 3 Year) | 4790 |
About Advances in Space Research
Advances in Space Research is a journal published by Elsevier Ltd. . This journal covers the area[s] related to Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Geophysics, Space and Planetary Science, Atmospheric Science, etc . The coverage history of this journal is as follows: 1981-2022. The rank of this journal is 8595 . This journal's impact score, h-index, and SJR are 2.92, 107, and 0.599, respectively. The ISSN of this journal is/are as follows: 02731177, 18791948 . The best quartile of Advances in Space Research is Q2 . This journal has received a total of 4790 citations during the last three years (Preceding 2022).
Advances in Space Research Impact Score 2022-2023
The impact score (IS), also denoted as the Journal impact score (JIS), of an academic journal is a measure of the yearly average number of citations to recent articles published in that journal. It is based on Scopus data.
Prediction of Advances in Space Research Impact Score 2023
Impact Score 2022 of Advances in Space Research is 2.92 . If a similar upward trend continues, IS may increase in 2023 as well.
Impact Score Graph
Check below the impact score trends of advances in space research. this is based on scopus data..
Year | Impact Score (IS) |
---|---|
2023/2024 | Coming Soon |
2022 | 2.92 |
2021 | 2.77 |
2020 | 2.49 |
2019 | 2.51 |
2018 | 2.08 |
2017 | 1.82 |
2016 | 1.72 |
2015 | 1.87 |
2014 | 1.69 |
Advances in Space Research h-index
The h-index of Advances in Space Research is 107 . By definition of the h-index, this journal has at least 107 published articles with more than 107 citations.
What is h-index?
The h-index (also known as the Hirsch index or Hirsh index) is a scientometric parameter used to evaluate the scientific impact of the publications and journals. It is defined as the maximum value of h such that the given Journal has published at least h papers and each has at least h citations.
Advances in Space Research ISSN
The International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) of Advances in Space Research is/are as follows: 02731177, 18791948 .
The ISSN is a unique 8-digit identifier for a specific publication like Magazine or Journal. The ISSN is used in the postal system and in the publishing world to identify the articles that are published in journals, magazines, newsletters, etc. This is the number assigned to your article by the publisher, and it is the one you will use to reference your article within the library catalogues.
ISSN code (also called as "ISSN structure" or "ISSN syntax") can be expressed as follows: NNNN-NNNC Here, N is in the set {0,1,2,3...,9}, a digit character, and C is in {0,1,2,3,...,9,X}
Advances in Space Research Ranking and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)
SCImago Journal Rank is an indicator, which measures the scientific influence of journals. It considers the number of citations received by a journal and the importance of the journals from where these citations come.
Advances in Space Research Publisher
The publisher of Advances in Space Research is Elsevier Ltd. . The publishing house of this journal is located in the United Kingdom . Its coverage history is as follows: 1981-2022 .
Call For Papers (CFPs)
Please check the official website of this journal to find out the complete details and Call For Papers (CFPs).
Abbreviation
The International Organization for Standardization 4 (ISO 4) abbreviation of Advances in Space Research is Adv. Space Res. . ISO 4 is an international standard which defines a uniform and consistent system for the abbreviation of serial publication titles, which are published regularly. The primary use of ISO 4 is to abbreviate or shorten the names of scientific journals using the technique of List of Title Word Abbreviations (LTWA).
As ISO 4 is an international standard, the abbreviation ('Adv. Space Res.') can be used for citing, indexing, abstraction, and referencing purposes.
How to publish in Advances in Space Research
If your area of research or discipline is related to Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous), Geophysics, Space and Planetary Science, Atmospheric Science, etc. , please check the journal's official website to understand the complete publication process.
Acceptance Rate
- Interest/demand of researchers/scientists for publishing in a specific journal/conference.
- The complexity of the peer review process and timeline.
- Time taken from draft submission to final publication.
- Number of submissions received and acceptance slots
- And Many More.
The simplest way to find out the acceptance rate or rejection rate of a Journal/Conference is to check with the journal's/conference's editorial team through emails or through the official website.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is the impact score of advances in space research.
The latest impact score of Advances in Space Research is 2.92. It is computed in the year 2023.
What is the h-index of Advances in Space Research?
The latest h-index of Advances in Space Research is 107. It is evaluated in the year 2023.
What is the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) of Advances in Space Research?
The latest SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) of Advances in Space Research is 0.599. It is calculated in the year 2023.
What is the ranking of Advances in Space Research?
The latest ranking of Advances in Space Research is 8595. This ranking is among 27955 Journals, Conferences, and Book Series. It is computed in the year 2023.
Who is the publisher of Advances in Space Research?
Advances in Space Research is published by Elsevier Ltd.. The publication country of this journal is United Kingdom.
What is the abbreviation of Advances in Space Research?
This standard abbreviation of Advances in Space Research is Adv. Space Res..
Is "Advances in Space Research" a Journal, Conference or Book Series?
Advances in Space Research is a journal published by Elsevier Ltd..
What is the scope of Advances in Space Research?
- Aerospace Engineering
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Space and Planetary Science
- Atmospheric Science
For detailed scope of Advances in Space Research, check the official website of this journal.
What is the ISSN of Advances in Space Research?
The International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) of Advances in Space Research is/are as follows: 02731177, 18791948.
What is the best quartile for Advances in Space Research?
The best quartile for Advances in Space Research is Q2.
What is the coverage history of Advances in Space Research?
The coverage history of Advances in Space Research is as follows 1981-2022.
Credits and Sources
- Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR), https://www.scimagojr.com/
- Journal Impact Factor, https://clarivate.com/
- Issn.org, https://www.issn.org/
- Scopus, https://www.scopus.com/
Note: The impact score shown here is equivalent to the average number of times documents published in a journal/conference in the past two years have been cited in the current year (i.e., Cites / Doc. (2 years)). It is based on Scopus data and can be a little higher or different compared to the impact factor (IF) produced by Journal Citation Report. Please refer to the Web of Science data source to check the exact journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.
Impact Score, SJR, h-Index, and Other Important metrics of These Journals, Conferences, and Book Series
Journal/Conference/Book Title | Type | Publisher | Ranking | SJR | h-index | Impact Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Check complete list
Advances in Space Research Impact Score (IS) Trend
Year | Impact Score (IS) |
---|---|
2023/2024 | Updated Soon |
2022 | 2.92 |
2021 | 2.77 |
2020 | 2.49 |
2019 | 2.51 |
2018 | 2.08 |
2017 | 1.82 |
2016 | 1.72 |
2015 | 1.87 |
2014 | 1.69 |
Top Journals/Conferences in Aerospace Engineering
Top journals/conferences in astronomy and astrophysics, top journals/conferences in earth and planetary sciences (miscellaneous), top journals/conferences in geophysics, top journals/conferences in space and planetary science, top journals/conferences in atmospheric science.
Advances in Space Research
Volume 2 • Issue 24
- ISSN: 0273-1177
Editor-In-Chief: Pascal Willis
- 5 Year impact factor: 2.6
- Impact factor: 2.8
- Journal metrics
The Official Journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR), an interdisciplinary scientific committee of the International Science Council (ISC).The COSPA… Read more
Subscription options
Institutional subscription on sciencedirect.
The Official Journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) , an interdisciplinary scientific committee of the International Science Council (ISC) .
The COSPAR publication Advances in Space Research (ASR) is an open journal covering all areas of space research including: space studies of the Earth's surface, meteorology, climate, the Earth-Moon system, planets and small bodies of the solar system, upper atmospheres, ionospheres and magnetospheres of the Earth and planets including reference atmospheres, space plasmas in the solar system, astrophysics from space, materials sciences in space, fundamental physics in space, space debris, space weather, Earth observations of space phenomena, etc.
NB: Please note that manuscripts related to life sciences as related to space are no more accepted for submission to Advances in Space Research. Such manuscripts should now be submitted to the new COSPAR Journal Life Sciences in Space Research (LSSR).
All submissions are reviewed by two scientists in the field. COSPAR is an interdisciplinary scientific organization concerned with the progress of space research on an international scale. Operating under the rules of ICSU, COSPAR ignores political considerations and considers all questions solely from the scientific viewpoint.
Advances in Space Research
Journal Abbreviation: ADV SPACE RES Journal ISSN: 0273-1177
About Advances in Space Research
Year | Impact Factor (IF) | Total Articles | Total Cites |
2023 (2024 update) | 2.8 | - | - |
2022 | 2.6 | - | 16676 |
2021 | 2.611 | - | 16492 |
2020 | 2.152 | 448 | 13721 |
2019 | 2.177 | 510 | 12627 |
2018 | 1.746 | 492 | 11413 |
2017 | 1.529 | 486 | 10015 |
2016 | 1.401 | 425 | 9176 |
2015 | 1.409 | 517 | 8414 |
2014 | 1.358 | 426 | 7959 |
2013 | 1.238 | 437 | 7327 |
2012 | 1.183 | 326 | 7209 |
2011 | 1.178 | 443 | 6916 |
2010 | 1.076 | 321 | 6324 |
You may also be interested in the following journals
- ► Journal of Geophysical Research
- ► Kleintierpraxis
- ► Kybernetes
- ► Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis
- ► Journal of Applied Economics
- ► Space Science Reviews
- ► Plant Biotechnology Reports
- ► International Journal of Climatology
- ► Advanced Materials
- ► Monthly Notices of The Royal Astronomical Society
Top Journals in astronomy
- Living Reviews in Solar Physics
- Astronomy and Astrophysics Review
- Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
- Space Science Reviews
- Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- New Astronomy Reviews
- Astrophysical Journal Letters
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Astrophysical Journal
- Monthly Notices of The Royal Astronomical Society
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
- Publications of The Astronomical Society of Australia
Journal Impact
Advances in Space Research
Journal info (provided by editor), % accepted last year, % immediately rejected last year, articles published last year, manuscripts received last year, open access status, manuscript handling fee, impact factors (provided by editor), two-year impact factor, five-year impact factor, aims and scope.
The COSPAR publication Advances in Space Research (ASR) is an open journal covering all areas of space research including: space studies of the Earth's surface, meteorology, climate, the Earth-Moon system, planets and small bodies of the solar system, upper atmospheres, ionospheres and magnetospheres of the Earth and planets including reference atmospheres, space plasmas in the solar system, astrophysics from space, materials sciences in space, fundamental physics in space, space debris, space weather, Earth observations of space phenomena, etc.
Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round, tot. handling time acc. manuscripts, decision time immediate rejection, average number of review rounds, difficulty of reviewer comments, average number of review reports, characteristics of peer review process, quality of review reports, overall rating manuscript handling, latest review.
First review round: 12.3 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.
Very good process
Disciplines
Related journals.
Congratulations!
Congratulations to dubai host of the 47th cospar scientific assembly, 8 - 16 july 2028., goodbye busan, goodbye busan, 감사합니다 (gamsahabnida) thank you to our wonderful korean hosts for your warm welcome. we hope cospar 2024 has helped all participants to make new connections, collaborations and friendships for life. , cospar resources and activities related to the united nations, cospar 2026, the 46th cospar scientific assembly will be held in florence, italy, 1 - 9 august, quick links.
Next COSPAR Scientific Assembly
Industry Corner
COSPAR for Education
COSPAR Strategic Action Plan 2024 - 2028
COSPAR Strategic Action Plans
Latest News
New Adhering Member Institution Report to COSPAR Now Available
COSPAR adhering institutions may use the opportunity of the forthcoming Scientific Assembly to demonstrate the capabilities and successes of space research and technology in their countries to the wide and attentive community of scientists, engineers, representatives of agencies and governments, and the general public which is present at these events. Submitted reports will be made available through this News item as they become available and will also be included in the Assembly app.
Advances in Space Research - Special Issues
Click to see recently or soon to be published / free to read ASR special issues and open calls for special issues.
COSPAR 2024 Awards Announced
See the press release for recipients of COSPAR 2022 awards and medals . COSPAR congratulates all recipients.
Advances in Space Research (ASR): Impact Factor
Advances in Space Research (ASR) , one of COSPAR's flagship scientific journals, has been awarded a 2023 Impact Factor of 2.8, improving in all categories.
COSPAR International Space Innovation Centre to be Launched
COSPAR is proud to announce the creation of the COSPAR International Space Innovation Centre, in partnership with the Cyprus Space Exploration Organization. The Center will be inaugurated during the C-SpaRC (Cyprus Space Research and Innovation Centre) Summit in Nicosia, Cyprus, 21-26 June 2024.
Space Research and its Transformative Role in the Space Sector
Read this significant article by COSPAR President, Prof. Pascale Ehrenfreund, published by SpaceWatchGlobal.
COSPAR-LASP partnership for 1st COSPAR Center of Excellence
The Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) is proud to announce its partnership with the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP) at the University of Colorado, Boulder, USA, designating the LASP Small/CubeSat group as a “COSPAR Center of Excellence for Capacity Building in CubeSat Technologies”. Read the press release.
COSPAR appoints Niklas Hedman as General Counsel
Please welcome Niklas Hedman, COSPAR’s new General Counsel. He brings invaluable knowledge and experience from his time at the United Nations, where he most recently held the position of Acting Director of the Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA). Read more in this press release.
Inaugural COSPAR International Planetary Protection Week
COSPAR’s Inaugural International Planetary Protection Week will be held at the Royal Society, London, UK, 22-25 April 2024. Hosted by AstrobiologyOU and funded by the UK Space Agency as part of the International Bilateral Fund, it will include sessions ranging from the Planetary Protection Landscape to Icy Worlds, and the Implementation of Planetary Protection. Register […]
COSPAR Outstanding Paper Awards for Young Scientists 2023 - LSSR
Congratulations to the recipients of the COSPAR Outstanding Paper Award for Young Scientists published in Life Sciences in Space Research (LSSR) in 2023.
Advances in Space Research
Number of papers | 3031 |
H4-Index | |
TQCC | |
Average citations | 4.803 |
Median citations | |
Impact Factor | 2.800 (based on 2023) |
( API-Link )
Impact Factor : 2.800 (based on Web of Science 2023)
- # 20 / 56 (Q2) in Astronomy & Astrophysics
- # 9 / 31 (Q2) in Engineering, Aerospace
- # 74 / 179 (Q2) in Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
- # 39 / 88 (Q2) in Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
Partner: • University Press Alert
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
- View all journals
- Explore content
- About the journal
- Publish with us
- Sign up for alerts
- Review Article
- Open access
- Published: 21 August 2024
Discoveries from human stem cell research in space that are relevant to advancing cellular therapies on Earth
- Fay Ghani ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0000-8638-2422 1 &
- Abba C. Zubair ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4827-4740 1
npj Microgravity volume 10 , Article number: 88 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
222 Accesses
6 Altmetric
Metrics details
- Stem-cell research
Stem cell research performed in space has provided fundamental insights into stem cell properties and behavior in microgravity including cell proliferation, differentiation, and regeneration capabilities. However, there is broader scientific value to this research including potential translation of stem cell research in space to clinical applications. Here, we present important discoveries from different studies performed in space demonstrating the potential use of human stem cells as well as the limitations in cellular therapeutics. A full understanding of the effects of microgravity in space on potentially supporting the expansion and/or enhancement of stem cell function is required to translate the findings into clinics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Feasibility, potency, and safety of growing human mesenchymal stem cells in space for clinical application
Conserved mechanisms of self-renewal and pluripotency in mouse and human ESCs regulated by simulated microgravity using a 3D clinostat
Space microgravity increases expression of genes associated with proliferation and differentiation in human cardiac spheres
Introduction.
Over the last two decades, there have been tremendous advancements in stem cell biology within regenerative medicine as well as innovations in space technologies. The International Space Station (ISS) has been increasingly supportive of academic and commercial groups using microgravity for research and product development with potential benefits for use on Earth 1 , 2 . There is a growing interest in evaluating the potential for stem cells and their derived tissues in space to model human disease mechanisms and treat diseases through cell therapy.
At the start of human spaceflight, the primary focus of life science research conducted in space was to understand the physiological effects of the spaceflight environment including microgravity on humans to keep them alive and well in this extreme environment. Additionally, medical research in space has uncovered valuable evidence about the effects of microgravity on the human condition including biological processes and disease pathways. A great wealth of knowledge about cells and tissues has been known in biomedical space research. In recent years, there has been an emerging interest from scientists, governments, and commercial entities to investigate human health in space for the benefit of humans on Earth too. Studying stem cells in space has uncovered their behavior in an environment other than Earth, revealing mechanisms which would otherwise be undetected or unknown with the inevitable presence of normal gravity. This includes changes to stem cell proliferation rates, differentiation, and lineage phenotypes 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 . Stem cell research performed in space has shown potential ways microgravity can be leveraged to advance cellular therapeutics in space to benefit human life and commercial enterprise on Earth 7 . This paper reviews important discoveries that have occurred in real microgravity conditions on the ISS demonstrating the impact of microgravity on fundamental stem cell properties relevant to regenerative medicine practices and therapeutics on Earth 3 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 . We present here different areas of stem cell research conducted in space that have potential to translate to terrestrial applications within the context of developing cellular therapies while also highlighting the limitations and opposing evidence available. Prior to these spaceflight studies, little was known about the role of microgravity in influencing human stem cell growth and fate. We are just starting to understand the ways in which a microgravity environment influences stem cell function, division, and survival.
Stem cell studies in space and their potential application
The main types of stem cells used in clinical and experimental cell therapy are pluripotent stem cells and adult stem cells. Pluripotent stem cells include embryonic stem cells, epiblast stem cells, embryonic germ cells and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). iPSCs are specialized human stem cells created in the lab from a person’s blood or skin cells and can generate nearly any cell in the body, and hence, can be used in regenerative medicine therapies. They are derived from direct reprogramming of postnatal/adult somatic cells in vitro. They also carry an individual’s own DNA making them ideal for creating tailored treatments for diseases and are essential in the field of personalized medicine. Currently, the clinical use of pluripotent stem cells largely lacks therapeutic evidence and is constrained to investigational regenerative medicine 15 , 16 , 17 . As for adult stem cells, they are rare, undifferentiated stem cells which replenish cells and contribute to growth and repair of tissue by giving rise to progenitor cells which differentiate into the required cell types. Adult stem cells include hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), skin stem cells (SSCs) and neural stem cells (NSCs) 18 . With current tissue engineering technologies and advancements in gene editing techniques, stem cells can be remodeled into three-dimensional organoids and tissue structures, further exacerbating their use in personalized regenerative applications 19 .
Stem cell-based therapies are a possible treatment for age-related conditions including stroke, dementia, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer, among other conditions and injuries. However, such treatments may require large amounts of stem cells, and this is difficult to achieve since expanding stem cells for therapies remains a challenge 20 . One of the most important factors influencing therapeutic effects of stem cells is their culture environment, including presence or absence of gravitational forces. Microgravity is recognized as a novel culture environment for stem cells as a result of the unique changes which can occur in a microgravity culture 4 .
Different research groups around the world have been working on expanding stem cells in space for use in terrestrial studies and practices. This is a result of the advantages that the microgravity environment provides to cells in space. The goal of almost all these spaceflight studies is to enhance growth of large amounts of safe and high-quality clinical-grade stem cells with minimal cell differentiation. The studies also evaluate the feasibility of successful harvest and transport of the space expanded stem cells back to Earth. Optimizing these experiments and creating standardized protocols can enable the growth of stem cells in space for patient use on Earth.
The space environment offers an advantage to the growth of stem cells by providing a more natural three-dimensional (3D) state for their expansion which closely resembles growth of cells in the human body, in comparison to the two-dimensional (2D) culture environment available on Earth which less likely imitates real tissue 21 . A 3D cell culture system better mimics the behaviors and reactions of cells in vivo than 2D systems by simulating native cell-cell interactions and development. Therefore, scientists are interested in the effects of microgravity in creating a 3D cell culture system for stem cells by offloading the gravitational forces exerted on cells and replicating physiological composition of cells and their spatial arrangements 22 . Different types of stem cells have been sent into space to assess whether space is in fact an ideal platform to produce large quantities of stem cells and eventually improve treatments on Earth.
Types of stem cells studied in space
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), cardiomyocytes derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC-CMs), cardiovascular progenitor cells (CPCs) and neural stem cells (NSCs) have been sent to the ISS and returned for analysis. Their phenotypic and functional characteristics including their biology, stemness, and fate choice towards specific lineages were evaluated to ensure their maintenance of identity and safety (Table 1 ). These stem cells are vital for stem cell therapy including bone marrow transplant for the treatment of bone or blood cancers, and helping patients recover neurons and blood vessels after a stroke. Successfully growing stem cells in space and maintaining their stemness without differentiation into other downstream lineages while bringing them back to Earth in good condition can make these cells feasible for use in patients in the future (Fig. 1 ).
Created with BioRender.com.
Mesenchymal stem cells
MSCs are known to have potential as therapeutic agents. However, their safe and efficient expansion while maintaining stem cell properties is still a major challenge in the field 23 . Nonetheless, a study conducted by Huang et al. 8 evaluated the feasibility, potency, and safety of growing human bone marrow derived MSCs in space for potential future clinical applications. The MSCs were grown on the ISS for two weeks and different analyses were performed on them after their return to Earth. The results of this study showed that MSCs maintained their phenotype and proliferative characteristics after expansion on the ISS, prior microgravity exposure did not influence MSC differentiation abilities, and several cytokines and growth factors were significantly altered by microgravity and dependent on duration of exposure. MSCs grown in space showed enhanced immunosuppressive capabilities compared to those cultured on Earth. Also, no evidence of malignant transformation or genomic integrity compromise were found as demonstrated via the chromosomal, DNA damage and tumorigenicity assays 8 .
Furthermore, it is hypothesized that MSC cultures maintained in microgravity may be used for cell-based therapy in diseases of the central nervous system. Results collected via gene expression profiling from the experiment “Stroma-2” performed aboard the ISS showed that in-space mouse bone marrow-derived MSCs had higher expression of genes involved in neural development, neuron morphogenesis, and transmission of nerve impulse and synapse than MSCs grown on Earth 24 . Also, human MSCs cultured in simulated microgravity demonstrated therapeutic properties in a mouse model of acute injury via significantly higher expression of anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic factors compared to MSCs cultured in normal gravity 25 . Brain-injured mice that were transplanted with MSCs cultured in microgravity showed greater motor functional recovery than those transplanted with MSCs cultured in normal gravity 26 . Similarly, rat bone marrow-derived MSCs cultured in simulated microgravity which were transplanted into a rat model of spinal cord injury showed enhanced functional improvement and therapeutic effects 27 . Although the detailed mechanisms remain unclear, the results of these various stem cell transplantation studies demonstrate the benefits of using simulated microgravity as part of the culture experimental design to enhance therapeutic effects of MSCs using cell-based therapy for central nervous system diseases.
Nonetheless, simulated microgravity has been shown to inhibit the migration of rat MSCs 28 and suppress the differentiation of human MSCs 6 , 29 , 30 , mouse MSCs 26 , and rat MSCs 27 , 31 . Suppression of differentiation under microgravity may alter generation of multiple tissue lineages in space 32 . However, inhibition of differentiation of MSCs preserves their stemness and allows them to maintain their stem cell identity. This could help expand the cells in space for clinical application on Earth. Furthermore, simulated microgravity has been seen to inhibit proliferation of MSCs in some studies 31 and show increased proliferation compared to those cultured in normal gravity in others 6 . Therefore, conflicting data is present on the behavior of MSCs in microgravity, and hence, their potential benefits in stem cell-based therapy needs to be further explored.
Hematopoietic stem cells
HSCs are primarily found in the bone marrow and give rise to all mature blood cells including red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets 33 . The effects of spaceflight on human HSC proliferation and differentiation were explored in vitro via culture of CD34+ bone marrow-derived cells in suspension for 11 days during the space shuttle mission STS-63 (Discovery) and 13 days during STS-69 (Endeavour). Compared to ground control samples, the in-space HSCs exhibited a significant decline in the growth of myeloid and erythroid progenitor cell numbers. The in-space HSCs also showed an absolute increase in terminally differentiated macrophages, suggesting accelerated differentiation towards the macrophage lineage. The study indicates that the proliferation and differentiation of HSCs is impacted by microgravity with erythropoiesis being particularly sensitive to changes in gravity. Therefore, gravity may play a key role in certain pathways and biological processes of in vitro hematopoiesis 9 . Additionally, these findings suggest that spaceflight anemia may be a result of suppression of erythropoiesis by microgravity, among other factors 9 , 34 , 35 . The reduced differentiation observed within in-space HSCs suggests that microgravity may play a role in preserving the stemness of HSCs, and hence, may be used as HSC therapy in which they can be given to patients to produce functional and terminally differentiated cells. It remains to be established that space expanded HSC can produce functional and terminally differentiated hematopoietic cells on Earth.
On the contrary, a significant decrease in the number of mouse bone marrow hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells was reported during 12 days of spaceflight and simulated microgravity, mainly by blocking cell cycle at G1/S transition. However, their differentiation abilities were not affected 36 . In addition to this, a study which analyzed peripheral blood samples from six astronauts who had participated in spaceflight missions found significant changes in several cell populations at different time points, including HSCs. The changes to lineage cells and HSCs were further studied in a mouse model, using hindlimb unloading to simulate microgravity, and found a reduction in frequency of NK cells, B cells, and erythrocyte precursors in the bone marrow and increase in frequency of T cells, neutrophils, and HSCs. Deep sequencing showed changes in the expression of regulatory molecules important for the differentiation of HSCs, and hence, their findings demonstrated that spaceflight and simulated microgravity may disrupt the homeostasis of immune system and cause dynamic changes to both HSCs and lineage cells 37 . Additionally, simulated microgravity was shown to significantly inhibit the migration potential, cell-cycle progression and differentiation patterns in primitive HSC 38 and impair DNA damage repair in human HSCs 39 . Profound changes to HSCs may limit their applications in stem cell-based therapies.
Cardiomyocytes derived from induced pluripotent stem cells
The heart has limited ability in regenerating lost cardiomyocytes following an adverse event like a heart attack 40 , 41 . However, cardiomyocytes derived from human iPSCs may be a potential solution to replacing lost and dead cells in such an event. Wnorowski et al. 2019 analyzed human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) following 5.5 weeks of culture in space on the ISS. Analysis of gene expression, structure, and functions of these cells in comparison with ground control hiPSC-CMs was done. The differences observed include changes in calcium handling while RNA-sequencing showed differential expression of 2635 genes among flight, post-flight, and ground control samples, specifically upregulated genes involved in mitochondrial metabolism. No significant differences in cell morphology or sarcomere structure between spaceflight and ground control samples were seen. This study demonstrated the use of hiPSC-CMs to model the effects of microgravity in space, showing that the cells change their functional properties in spaceflight and compensate for the reduction in gravity by altering their gene expression patterns at the cellular level. Also, this study demonstrated the successful culture and return of viable cardiomyocytes derived from iPSCs which may pose potential therapeutic use 10 .
Additionally, another study investigated hiPSC-CMs in space, starting with hiPSC-cardiac progenitors. Cryopreserved 3D hiPSC-cardiac progenitors differentiated into cardiomyocytes and showed 3-fold larger sphere sizes, 20-fold higher counts of nuclei, and increased expression of proliferation markers compared to ground control samples, following three weeks on the ISS. In-space hiPSC-CMs also demonstrated increased expression of contraction-associated genes and enhanced calcium handling. Transient exposure to microgravity (3 days) showed upregulation in genes involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, survival, and contraction 11 . Therefore, the successful expansion of hiPSC-CMs derived from hiPSC-cardiac progenitors in space resulted in efficient production of highly enriched cardiomyocytes with the required features for function, and thus, may present potential therapeutic applications. These findings are supported by another study in which cardiac spheres derived from hiPSCs in simulated microgravity culture showed enhanced production of highly enriched cardiomyocytes (99% purity) with high viability (90%), upregulation of genes associated with proliferation and survival and expected functional properties 5 . During iPSC generation, the gravity-induced tension present on Earth is absent under microgravity conditions, possibly making it easier for stem cells to multiply quicker.
Cardiovascular progenitor cells
Cardiac regeneration is limited due to insufficient numbers of cardiovascular progenitor cells (CPCs), low self-renewal potency and production of immature cardiomyocytes, among other reasons 42 . Current clinical trials which stimulate repair in damaged heart tissue are promising 43 , 44 but are limited as a result of cells failing to engraft into the host tissue and use of progenitor cells restricted in potency 45 . CPCs are capable of self-renewal and differentiation into the three main cell types of cardiac tissue including cardiomyocytes, smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells 46 . Therefore, characterizing the molecular events which encourage stemness in CPCs during spaceflight may have implications for enhancing their regenerative potential for stem cell-based cardiac repair. CPCs shift from silent to active phases during processes of tissue regeneration which contributes to their differentiation into new myocytes and endothelial cells 47 .
On the ISS, neonatal and adult CPCs were cultured, and both showed increased expression of DNA repair genes and paracrine factors, and enhanced migration. Changes in cytoskeletal modifications as a result of reduced mechanotransduction were reported 3 , 12 . The findings showed that neonatal CPCs exhibited increased expression of early developmental markers and proliferative potential while adult CPCs did not 3 . An increased understanding of the response of CPCs to microgravity in space and identification of novel targets for enhancing therapies can help advance novel cardiovascular stem cell therapies on Earth 3 , 12 . Additionally, microgravity in space activated yes-associated protein (YAP1), a key component of the Hippo signaling pathway which regulates cell proliferation and cardiac development 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 in adult CPCs which have potential benefit for cardiovascular repair. The study suggests that inducing adult CPCs to overexpress YAP1 can enable these progenitors to have regeneration potential similar to that of neonatal CPCs 12 . This is particularly significant in the field of cardiac regeneration, given that the human heart has limited regeneration capabilities.
Neural stem cells
Neural stem cells (NSCs) derived from human iPSCs were cultured on the ISS and then returned to Earth. Analysis of these cells showed that they preserved their stemness and were able to proliferate in space while also remaining as NSCs after 39.3 days unattended in the same culture medium in space. These in-space NSCs were able to maintain their ability to become young neurons when cultured in neuronal specification media (NSM) upon return, indicating that exposure to microgravity in space did not change their potential to choose the neuronal fate. Additionally, neuroblasts proliferated for over a week when placed in NSM before deciding to mature 13 .
These findings show that microgravity is an excellent tool to increase neural cell numbers without the need to perform genetic manipulations of long-term treatments with mitogens. This is relevant to advancing human health on Earth since neurodegenerative diseases frequently result from loss of a specific cell population and perhaps in-space grown NSCs can be a potential solution. Investigating the effects of microgravity in space on the regulation of NSCs and their commitment to a specific lineage can offer benefits to patients on Earth for cell replacement therapies and recovery of CNS structure and function. This can be done by using donor cells from the patients themselves to address neurodegenerative and development disorders including cerebral palsy or multiple sclerosis, and then developing personalized treatments for them.
In addition to this, RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) based transcriptomic profiling revealed that NSCs maintained greater stemness ability during spaceflight via elevation of markers for stemness including Sox2, Pax6 , and Notch1 despite reduction in growth rate. Also, the increased expression of mature neuron marker Map2 and decrease in astrocyte marker Gfap and the oligodendrocyte markers Gal and Olig2 demonstrated NSCs’ tendency to differentiate into neurons in space. These findings suggest that culture in outer space combined with biomaterial-based 3D culture system may improve the neural differentiation abilities of NSCs in vitro and contribute to tissue engineering. Further understanding of the mechanisms which occur in NSCs during spaceflight could improve our knowledge and unveil potential benefits for NSC-based regenerative medicine 52 . Also, boundary cap neural crest stem cells exposed to real microgravity in space showed improved viability and increased survival and proliferation compared to cells exposed to simulated gravity on Earth, with significantly different gene expression patterns for proliferation, adhesion, and differentiation between the space and simulated microgravity groups 53 . Conflicting evidence persists since in-space NSCs experience a reduction in growth rate in space 52 but also proliferate at a higher rate and up to 72 h following spaceflight, irrespective of flight duration 54 , 55 .
Furthermore, a recent study which assessed the behavior of in-space NSCs that readapted to Earth’s gravity found that although most of these cells survived spaceflight and self-renewed, some showed enhanced stress responses and autophagy-like behavior via secretome and proteomics analysis 56 and increased energy production demands 57 . Also, NSCs derived from hiPSCs which remained onboard the ISS for 39.6 days before returning to Earth showed an increased number of abnormal cell division events between one- and two-weeks post-space flight 58 . Nonetheless, the different cell types that form the central nervous system, either individually or collectively, may respond to microgravity in different ways 56 . Also, the culture hardware used in space may play a role in how cells respond.
Further benefits
In addition to using in-space stem cells for clinical use on Earth, there are many other benefits that result from this scientific endeavor. Stem cells in space can be used as tools for scientists in disease modelling to test new therapeutics when studying a specific disease. Performing such experiments expands the use of space as a unique and natural environment in biomedical research to study biological phenomena to manipulate cell processes. Also, advancing in-space expansion of stem cells opens the door to exploring many other cell types and potential therapeutics to be evaluated and tested in microgravity, besides stem cells. Such research also encourages the study of organoids in space which may hold promising regenerative medicine and translational stem cell applications 59 .
Additionally, the potential privatization and/or commercialization of in-space stem cells allows the acceleration of research and technology development in low Earth orbit (LEO), further expanding the medical commerce in space and valuable biomanufacturing enterprises. The advancements currently taking place in space infrastructure technologies are promising in reducing costs and increasing frequency to access space 7 . Growing stem cells in space pushes the boundaries of creativity and innovation in seeking ways to help patients and advancing medical practice forward, that may not be replicated in a terrestrial setting. Using the LEO environment to expand stem cells and other products for scientific research and clinical use could provide insights that have significant impacts to the greater scientific community and public.
Furthermore, understanding how stem cells behave in space and their subsequent expansion helps the development of suitable countermeasures to protect astronauts from problems encountered during long-duration spaceflight missions. It benefits current and future space travelers as more knowledge is known about the effects of microgravity on the behavior of stem cells. An interdisciplinary approach including experts from a range of disciplines is required to achieve the full benefits of utilizing space to expand stem cells and stem cell-derived tissues for the benefit of mankind.
Current limitations and gaps
Despite the potential benefits to using stem cells grown in space for clinical use, there remain limitations and gaps in our knowledge, scientific practices, and funding capabilities to make this a reality for patients. Studying stem cells in space and investigating their safety and feasibility for use in cellular therapies is still in its infancy. A full understanding of the effects of microgravity on stem cell growth and differentiation is needed. It is yet to be established whether microgravity induces expansion (quantity) or potency/stemness (quality) or both and whether the effect is universal to all types of stem cells 60 . There is conflicting evidence in the literature about the regenerative potential of various types of stem cells, as benefits associated with culturing stem cells in microgravity are reported for mesenchymal stem cells 6 , 8 , 24 , 25 , 26 hematopoietic stem cells 9 , cardiomyocytes derived from hiPSCs 10 , 11 , 61 , cardiovascular progenitor cells 3 , 12 and neural stem cells 13 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 and disadvantages for mesenchymal stem cells 6 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , hematopoietic stem cells 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 and neural stem cells 52 , 56 , 57 , 58 . Additionally, it has been reported that microgravity reduces regenerative potential of other stem cells including embryonic stem cells 32 . While simulated microgravity is seen to inhibit osteogenesis of MSCs 31 , 62 , it is also seen to increase adipogenesis 62 . There is limited understanding of how microgravity in space affects stem cell differentiation since on Earth this is a major barrier to expanding large quantities of stem cells. Also, optimal cell culture media for the in vitro expansion of stem cells while maintaining stemness and limiting differentiation is not well-established 60 . Further research is required to understand the stem cell-specific changes which occur in space to different types of stem cells, how to leverage and target those benefits while minimizing the disadvantages, and potential implications for regenerative therapeutics.
Additionally, different stem cell samples from different donors and sources need to be tested. The variability which exists in stem cell potency between different cell lines and the inability to maintain potency and genetic integrity with cell proliferation is still a challenge 7 . Also, it is important to note that on Earth and especially with ageing, stem cell exhaustion occurs. This is known as the decrease in stem cell abundance and activity where they stop dividing after a couple of population doublings 63 . Whether stem cell exhaustion happens in space needs to be studied, especially since the spaceflight microgravity environment induces an accelerated ageing phenotype in many in vivo physiological systems 64 , 65 , 66 .
Furthermore, microgravity is not the only major environmental change that stem cells are exposed to in space. Ionizing radiation (IR) in space affects stem cells, particularly when they are dividing, and this can transform cells to be malignant. Research has shown that stem cells exposed to simulated cosmic galactic cosmic ray (GCR) radiation or solar energetic particles (SEP) experience dramatic changes in their differentiation potential and report increased apoptosis, delayed DNA repair, DNA damage and mutations which may lead to leukemic transformation within the hematopoietic system 67 , 68 , 69 . Although IR exposure is associated with an increase in cancer risk, particularly leukemias, the exact mechanisms underlying IR-induced malignancy remain poorly understood 70 , 71 , 72 . The effects of IR on tissues are complex and the causation of oncogenic mutations is not the only mechanism to explain the relationship between IR and cancers, among other factors 73 . Evidence of the overall carcinogenic susceptibility of stem cells in space, whether influenced by cosmic radiation, microgravity, or other stressors as contributing factors, is limited, and needs to be understood to assess the feasibility of growing stem cells in space for use on Earth.
The costs associated with this sort of research and large-scale production of in-space stem cells for patient use is high and limited by the challenges of launching and performing experiments in space. There is also a need for validation of in-space products for terrestrial applications. Nonetheless, recent scientific research efforts and global forums like the 2020 Biomanufacturing in Space symposium have outlined the foundations required to leverage microgravity in LEO to advance stem cell therapeutics and biomanufacturing for regenerative medicine purposes. An extensive roadmap to overcoming barriers is required where financial investments are coupled with scientific research and innovation 7 . Also, stem cells grown in space for research and subsequent therapies must follow the best practices and guidelines currently in place. This includes abiding by the International Stem Cell Initiative (ICSI) and the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) standard 74 . Nevertheless, major developments and discoveries addressing stem cells in space have occurred in the past decade alone which can propel this unique branch of regenerative medicine further.
Returning to Earth: requirements and considerations for in-space stem cell use in patients
While stem cell research in space provides valuable insights into effects of the spaceflight environment on their behavior, including both benefits and existing challenges, their therapeutic translation requires establishing standard safety and functionality protocols and suitable regulatory approvals. The studies in this review show that the spaceflight environment does not harm the different types of stem cells investigated and may enhance their quantity and/or quality. However, it is important to also investigate whether stem cells cultured in space can do their job effectively when back on Earth. It is not enough that stem cells can grow in space and retain their stem cell characteristics. Further studies must investigate the safety, functionality, and feasibility of growing stem cells in space for patient use and make a conclusion about whether the advantages in space outweigh the challenges and costs. Also, they must address whether there is a significant benefit and novelty in choosing to expand stem cells in space than on Earth particularly for clinical use.
Stem cells grown in space are different to those grown on Earth, and so, specific protocols and safety checkpoints unique to them must be created and followed. Analyses regarding their suitability to be used in cell therapy must be established while passing the required quality control procedures and regulatory guidelines, including further research and clinical trials (Table 2 ). Also, since different types of stem cells react differently in space, a comprehensive framework identifying the stem cell-specific changes which happen are crucial moving forward.
Expanding stem cells for regenerative medicine applications is a novel therapeutic strategy for many conditions. In this paper, we discussed the innovative approaches to growing stem cells in space for potential use on Earth along with the conflicting data which exists today. The evidence available suggests that microgravity culture conditions may have substantial potential as a cell culture environment for expanding cells with improved therapeutic effects while the full underlying treatment mechanisms remain unclear. Incorporating microgravity into projects of a translational nature may lead to benefits towards patients on Earth to address important developmental and aging disorders, injuries, and diseases across different organ systems. This may bring the scientific community closer to creating promising cellular therapies for debilitating conditions, as well as uncovering pathways and mechanisms about stem cells in a unique environment like space. These results not only give important information fundamental to stem cell biology but enable the further development of LEO-based stem cell research platforms. Therefore, a broader perspective about stem cell applications is possible in space as research continues to explore the use of space for regenerative medicine.
Parfenov, V. A. et al. Magnetic levitational bioassembly of 3D tissue construct in space. Sci. Adv. 6 , eaba4174, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba4174 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Giulianotti, M. A. & Low, L. A. Pharmaceutical research enabled through microgravity: perspectives on the use of the international space station US national laboratory. Pharm. Res-Dordr. 37 , 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-019-2719-z (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Baio, J. et al. Cardiovascular progenitor cells cultured aboard the International Space Station exhibit altered developmental and functional properties. Npj Microgravity 4 , 13, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-018-0048-x (2018).
Imura, T., Otsuka, T., Kawahara, Y. & Yuge, L. “Microgravity” as a unique and useful stem cell culture environment for cell-based therapy. Regen. Ther. 12 , 2–5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2019.03.001 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jha, R. et al. Simulated Microgravity and 3D Culture Enhance Induction, Viability, Proliferation and Differentiation of Cardiac Progenitors from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Sci. Rep. 6 , 30956, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30956 (2016).
Yuge, L. et al. Microgravity potentiates stem cell proliferation while sustaining the capability of differentiation. Stem Cells Dev. 15 , 921–929, https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2006.15.921 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sharma, A. et al. Biomanufacturing in low Earth orbit for regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Rep. 17 , 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.12.001 (2022).
Article Google Scholar
Huang, P. et al. Feasibility, potency, and safety of growing human mesenchymal stem cells in space for clinical application. Npj Microgravity 6 , 16, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-020-0106-z (2020).
Davis, T. A. et al. Effect of spaceflight on human stem cell hematopoiesis: Suppression of erythropoiesis and myelopoiesis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 60 , 69–76, https://doi.org/10.1002/jlb.60.1.69 (1996).
Wnorowski, A. et al. Effects of Spaceflight on Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocyte Structure and Function. Stem Cell Rep. 13 , 960–969, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.10.006 (2019).
Rampoldi, A. et al. Space microgravity improves proliferation of human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Stem Cell Rep. 17 , 2272–2285, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.08.007 (2022).
Camberos, V. et al. Effects of Spaceflight and Simulated Microgravity on YAP1 Expression in Cardiovascular Progenitors: Implications for Cell-Based Repair. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 , 2742, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20112742 (2019).
Cepeda, C. et al. Human Neural Stem Cells Flown into Space Proliferate and Generate Young Neurons. Appl Sci.-Basel 9 , 4042, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9194042 (2019).
Mao, A. S. & Mooney, D. J. Regenerative medicine: Current therapies and future directions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 , 14452–14459, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508520112 (2015).
Singh, V. K., Saini, A., Kalsan, M., Kumar, N. & Chandra, R. Describing the Stem Cell Potency: The Various Methods of Functional Assessment and In silico Diagnostics. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 4 , 134, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2016.00134 (2016).
Hanna, J. H., Saha, K. & Jaenisch, R. Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming: facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues. Cell 143 , 508–525, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.008 (2010).
Chu, D. T. et al. Recent Progress of Stem Cell Therapy in Cancer Treatment: Molecular Mechanisms and Potential Applications. Cells-Basel 9 , 563, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9030563 (2020).
Gurusamy, N., Alsayari, A., Rajasingh, S. & Rajasingh, J. Adult Stem Cells for Regenerative Therapy. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 160 , 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2018.07.009 (2018).
Mahla, R. S. Stem Cells Applications in Regenerative Medicine and Disease Therapeutics. Int J. Cell Biol. 2016 , 6940283, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6940283 (2016).
Chen, C. M., Hu, Z. G., Liu, S. B. & Tseng, H. Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opin. Biol. Th 12 , 593–608, https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2012.674507 (2012).
Ma, C., Duan, X. & Lei, X. 3D cell culture model: From ground experiment to microgravity study. Front Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11 , 1136583, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1136583 (2023).
Park, Y., Huh, K. M. & Kang, S. W. Applications of Biomaterials in 3D Cell Culture and Contributions of 3D Cell Culture to Drug Development and Basic Biomedical Research. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052491 (2021).
Zhang, Y., Ravikumar, M., Ling, L., Nurcombe, V. & Cool, S. M. Age-Related Changes in the Inflammatory Status of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Implications for Cell Therapy. Stem Cell Rep. 16 , 694–707, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.01.021 (2021).
Monticone, M., Liu, Y., Pujic, N. & Cancedda, R. Activation of nervous system development genes in bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells following spaceflight exposure. J. Cell Biochem 111 , 442–452, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.22765 (2010).
Otsuka, T. et al. Simulated Microgravity Culture Enhances the Neuroprotective Effects of Human Cranial Bone-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Traumatic Brain Injury. Stem Cells Dev. 27 , 1287–1297, https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2017.0299 (2018).
Yuge, L. et al. Simulated Microgravity Maintains the Undifferentiated State and Enhances the Neural Repair Potential of Bone Marrow Stromal Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 20 , 893–900, https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2010.0294 (2011).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Mitsuhara, T. et al. Simulated microgravity facilitates cell migration and neuroprotection after bone marrow stromal cell transplantation in spinal cord injury. Stem Cell Res Ther. 4 , 35, https://doi.org/10.1186/scrt184 (2013).
Mao, X., Chen, Z., Luo, Q., Zhang, B. & Song, G. Simulated microgravity inhibits the migration of mesenchymal stem cells by remodeling actin cytoskeleton and increasing cell stiffness. Cytotechnology 68 , 2235–2243, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-016-0007-x (2016).
Chen, Z., Luo, Q., Lin, C. C. & Song, G. B. Simulated microgravity inhibits osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through down regulating the transcriptional co-activator TAZ. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 468 , 21–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.11.006 (2015).
Merzlikina, N. V., Buravkova, L. B. & Romanov, Y. A. The primary effects of clinorotation on cultured human mesenchymal stem cells. J. Gravit. Physiol. 11 , P193–P194 (2004).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dai, Z. Q., Wang, R., Ling, S. K., Wan, Y. M. & Li, Y. H. Simulated microgravity inhibits the proliferation and osteogenesis of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Prolif. 40 , 671–684, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2184.2007.00461.x (2007).
Blaber, E. A. et al. Microgravity Reduces the Differentiation and Regenerative Potential of Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 24 , 2605–2621, https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2015.0218 (2015).
Mosaad, Y. M. Hematopoietic stem cells: an overview. Transfus. Apher. Sci. 51 , 68–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2014.10.016 (2014).
Tavassoli, M. Anemia of spaceflight. Blood 60 , 1059–1067 (1982).
Kimzey, S. L. The effects of extended spaceflight on hematologic and immunologic systems. J. Am. Med Women’s Assoc. 30 , 218–232 (1975).
CAS Google Scholar
Wang, P. et al. Spaceflight/microgravity inhibits the proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells by decreasing Kit-Ras/cAMP-CREB pathway networks as evidenced by RNA-Seq assays. FASEB J. 33 , 5903–5913, https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201802413R (2019).
Cao, D. et al. Hematopoietic stem cells and lineage cells undergo dynamic alterations under microgravity and recovery conditions. FASEB J. 33 , 6904–6918, https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201802421RR (2019).
Plett, P. A., Abonour, R., Frankovitz, S. M. & Orschell, C. M. Impact of modeled microgravity on migration, differentiation, and cell cycle control of primitive human hematopoietic progenitor cells. Exp. Hematol. 32 , 773–781, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2004.03.014 (2004).
Low, E. K. et al. Microgravity Impairs DNA Damage Repair in Human Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells and Inhibits Their Differentiation into Dendritic Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 27 , 1257–1267, https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2018.0052 (2018).
Bergmann, O. et al. Dynamics of Cell Generation and Turnover in the Human Heart. Cell 161 , 1566–1575, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.026 (2015).
Laflamme, M. A. & Murry, C. E. Heart regeneration. Nature 473 , 326–335, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10147 (2011).
Nadal-Ginard, B., Kajstura, J., Leri, A. & Anversa, P. Myocyte death, growth, and regeneration in cardiac hypertrophy and failure. Circ. Res. 92 , 139–150, https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.0000053618.86362.df (2003).
Makkar, R. R. et al. Intracoronary cardiosphere-derived cells for heart regeneration after myocardial infarction (CADUCEUS): a prospective, randomised phase 1 trial. Lancet 379 , 895–904, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60195-0 (2012).
Gerbin, K. A. & Murry, C. E. The winding road to regenerating the human heart. Cardiovasc Pathol. 24 , 133–140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpath.2015.02.004 (2015).
Hong, K. U. et al. c-kit+ Cardiac stem cells alleviate post-myocardial infarction left ventricular dysfunction despite poor engraftment and negligible retention in the recipient heart. PLoS One 9 , e96725, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096725 (2014).
Sturzu, A. C. & Wu, S. M. Developmental and regenerative biology of multipotent cardiovascular progenitor cells. Circ. Res. 108 , 353–364, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.227066 (2011).
Urbanek, K. et al. Myocardial regeneration by activation of multipotent cardiac stem cells in ischemic heart failure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 , 8692–8697, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500169102 (2005).
Di Cara, F. et al. The Hippo pathway promotes cell survival in response to chemical stress. Cell Death Differ. 22 , 1526–1539, https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2015.10 (2015).
Mach, J. et al. Modulation of the Hippo pathway and organ growth by RNA processing proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115 , 10684–10689, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807325115 (2018).
Pan, D. Hippo signaling in organ size control. Genes Dev. 21 , 886–897, https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1536007 (2007).
Yu, F. X., Zhao, B. & Guan, K. L. Hippo Pathway in Organ Size Control, Tissue Homeostasis, and Cancer. Cell 163 , 811–828, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.044 (2015).
Cui, Y. et al. Systematic Analysis of mRNA and miRNA Expression of 3D-Cultured Neural Stem Cells (NSCs) in Spaceflight. Front Cell Neurosci. 11 , 434, https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00434 (2017).
Han, Y. et al. Molecular genetic analysis of neural stem cells after space flight and simulated microgravity on earth. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 118 , 3832–3846, https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27858 (2021).
Lee, A. G. et al. Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS) and the neuro-ophthalmologic effects of microgravity: a review and an update (vol 82, pg 931, 2020). Npj Microgravity 6 , 23, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-020-00114-8 (2020).
Espinosa-Jeffrey, A. et al. Impact of Simulated Microgravity on Oligodendrocyte Development: Implications for Central Nervous System Repair. Plos One 8 , e76963, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076963 (2013).
Carpo, N., Tran, V., Biancotti, J. C., Cepeda, C. & Espinosa-Jeffrey, A. Space Flight Enhances Stress Pathways in Human Neural Stem Cells. Biomolecules 14 https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14010065 (2024).
Biancotti, J. C. & Espinosa-Jeffrey, A. Metabolomic Profiling of the Secretome from Human Neural Stem Cells Flown into. Space Bioeng.-Basel 11 , 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11010011 (2024).
Shaka, S., Carpo, N., Tran, V., Cepeda, C. & Espinosa-Jeffrey, A. Space Microgravity Alters Neural Stem Cell Division: Implications for Brain Cancer Research on Earth and in Space. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214320 (2022).
Azar, J. et al. The Use of Stem Cell-Derived Organoids in Disease Modeling: An Update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147667 (2021).
Yadav, P., Vats, R., Bano, A. & Bhardwaj, R. Hematopoietic Stem Cells Culture, Expansion and Differentiation: An Insight into Variable and Available Media. Int J. Stem Cells 13 , 326–334, https://doi.org/10.15283/ijsc19157 (2020).
Reya, T., Morrison, S. J., Clarke, M. F. & Weissman, I. L. Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature 414 , 105–111, https://doi.org/10.1038/35102167 (2001).
Zayzafoon, M., Gathings, W. E. & McDonald, J. M. Modeled microgravity inhibits osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells and increases adipogenesis. Endocrinology 145 , 2421–2432, https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2003-1156 (2004).
Oh, J., Lee, Y. D. & Wagers, A. J. Stem cell aging: mechanisms, regulators and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Med 20 , 870–880, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3651 (2014).
Michel, E. L., Rummel, J. A. & Sawin, C. F. Skylab experiment M-171 “Metabolic Activity”–results of the first manned mission. Acta Astronaut 2 , 351–365, https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(75)90101-0 (1975).
Demontis, G. C. et al. Human Pathophysiological Adaptations to the Space Environment. Front Physiol. 8 , 547, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00547 (2017).
Strollo, F., Gentile, S., Strollo, G., Mambro, A. & Vernikos, J. Recent progress in space physiology and aging. Front Physiol. 9 , 1551, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01551 (2018).
Almeida-Porada, G. et al. Exposure of the bone marrow microenvironment to simulated solar and galactic cosmic radiation induces biological bystander effects on human hematopoiesis. Stem Cells Dev. 27 , 1237–1256, https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2018.0005 (2018).
Giri, J. & Moll, G. MSCs in Space: mesenchymal stromal cell therapeutics as enabling technology for long-distance manned space travel. Curr. Stem Cell Rep. 8 , 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40778-022-00207-y (2022).
Wang, Y., An, L., Jiang, Y. & Hang, H. Effects of simulated microgravity on embryonic stem cells. PLoS One 6 , e29214, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029214 (2011).
Finch, S. C. Radiation-induced leukemia: Lessons from history. Best. Pr. Res Cl. Ha 20 , 109–118, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beha.2006.10.009 (2007).
Little, J. B. Radiation carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 21 , 397–404, https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/21.3.397 (2000).
Ron, E. Ionizing radiation and cancer risk: evidence from epidemiology. Radiat. Res. 150 , S30–S41 (1998).
Fleenor, C. J., Marusyk, A. & DeGregori, J. Ionizing radiation and hematopoietic malignancies: altering the adaptive landscape. Cell Cycle 9 , 3005–3011, https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.15.12311 (2010).
Daley, G. Q. et al. Setting Global Standards for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation: The 2016 ISSCR Guidelines. Stem Cell Rep. 6 , 787–797, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.05.001 (2016).
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Center for Regenerative Biotherapeutics and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
Fay Ghani & Abba C. Zubair
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Contributions
The authors Fay Ghani and Abba C. Zubair contributed equally and have both participated in conceptualizing the research or content of the manuscript, in writing or critically editing the manuscript, and/or in analysis of data presented in the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Abba C. Zubair .
Ethics declarations
Competing interests.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article.
Ghani, F., Zubair, A.C. Discoveries from human stem cell research in space that are relevant to advancing cellular therapies on Earth. npj Microgravity 10 , 88 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-024-00425-0
Download citation
Received : 21 March 2024
Accepted : 12 August 2024
Published : 21 August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-024-00425-0
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Quick links
- Explore articles by subject
- Guide to authors
- Editorial policies
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Advances in Space Research is an open journal covering all areas of space research and the official publication of COSPAR. It has a high acceptance rate, fast publication speed, and various special issues and article collections.
Resurchify provides information on the impact factor, ranking, h-index, SJR, and other metrics of Advances in Space Research, a journal covering all areas of space research. See the latest data, trends, and predictions for 2023 based on Scopus data.
Advances in Space Research is an open journal covering all areas of space research, published by Elsevier Ltd. It has an SJR of 0.346, an H-Index of 114, and is ranked in the second quartile in several categories related to space science.
Find out the impact factor, quartile, ranking, and other information of ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, a multidisciplinary journal of engineering, astronomy, and meteorology. The journal is published in England and has an open access option.
Advances in Space Research is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is published 24 times per year by Elsevier.It was established in 1981 and is the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR). The editor-in-chief is Pascal Willis.. Topics of interest for this journal are all interactions observed in space research, including space studies of the Earth's surface, meteorology ...
ASR is an open journal covering all areas of space research, published by Elsevier and included in the Web of Science and the Science Citation Index. The 2023 impact factor for ASR is 2.8, improving in all categories.
2005 — Volumes 35-36. Previous. Page 1 of 3. ISSN: 0273-1177. Read the latest articles of Advances in Space Research at ScienceDirect.com, Elsevier's leading platform of peer-reviewed scholarly literature.
The latest impact score (IS) of the Advances in Space Research is 2.92.It is computed in the year 2023 as per its definition and based on Scopus data. 2.92 It is increased by a factor of around 0.15, and the percentage change is 5.42% compared to the preceding year 2021, indicating a rising trend.The impact score (IS), also denoted as the Journal impact score (JIS), of an academic journal is a ...
The Official Journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR), an interdisciplinary scientific committee of the International Science Council (ISC).. The COSPAR publication Advances in Space Research (ASR) is an open journal covering all areas of space research including: space studies of the Earth's surface, meteorology, climate, the Earth-Moon system, planets and small bodies of the solar ...
The COSPAR publication Advances in Space Research (ASR) is an open journal covering all areas of space research including: ... Impact factor; Advances in Space Research. $ 2780: 2.8: APCs are only available for journals that offer the option of publishing your research in gold Open Access. The journals you can find here for comparison cover ...
Advances in Space Research (ASR), one of COSPAR's flagship scientific journals, has been awarded a 2023 Impact Factor of 2.8, improving in all categories: - Engineering , Aerospace remains in Q1. - Geosciences, multidisplinary improved from Q3 to Q2. - Astronomy & Astrophysics remains in Q2.
Advances in Space Research Impact Factor, IF, number of article, detailed information and journal factor. ISSN: 0273-1177. ... (ASR) is an open journal covering all areas of space research including: space studies of the Earth surface, meteorology, climate, the Earth-Moon system, planets and small bodies of the solar system, upper atmospheres ...
Advances in Space Research. The University of Kiel Cosmic Ray Instrument on board the solar probes HELIOS-1 and -2 measured angular distributions of electrons, protons, and heavier nuclei between ...
Five-year impact factor 1.46. Aims and Scope . The COSPAR publication Advances in Space Research (ASR) is an open journal covering all areas of space research including: space studies of the Earth's surface, meteorology, climate, the Earth-Moon system, planets and small bodies of the solar system, upper atmospheres, ionospheres and ...
Top authors and change over time. The top authors publishing in Advances in Space Research (based on the number of publications) are: Christopher T. Russell (143 papers) absent at the last edition,; Dieter Bilitza (80 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition,; Bodo W. Reinisch (67 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition,; Sandro M. Radicella (63 papers) published 1 paper at the ...
Advances in Space Research. Supports open access. 5.0 CiteScore. 2.6 Impact Factor. Articles & Issues. About. Publish. Order journal. Menu. Articles & Issues. Latest issue; ... Research article Open access Impact of incorporating Spire CubeSat GPS observations in a global GPS network solution.
Advances in Space Research (ASR): Impact Factor Published Saturday, June 22nd, 2024. Advances in Space Research (ASR), one of COSPAR's flagship scientific journals, has been awarded a 2023 Impact Factor of 2.8, improving in all categories. COSPAR International Space Innovation Centre to be Launched Published Friday, June 21st, 2024 ...
The impact factor of Advances in Space Research, and other metrics like the H-Index and TQCC, alongside relevant research trends, citation patterns, altmetric scores, Twitter account and similar journals. ... Advances in Space Research 2023-05-30. Ad. 0.0042388439178467. The Observatory of International Research. Home Trending Papers Journal ...
Evaluation of soil quality of cultivated lands with classification and regression-based machine learning algorithms optimization under humid environmental condition. Orhan Dengiz, Pelin Alaboz, Fikret Saygın, Kemal Adem, Emre Yüksek. In Press, Journal Pre-proof, Available online 22 August 2024. View PDF.
Advances in Space Research 2023-2024 Journal's Impact IF is 2.611. Check Out IF Ranking, Prediction, Trend & Key Factor Analysis.
Know all about Advances in Space Research - Impact factor, Acceptance rate, Scite Analysis, H-index, SNIP Score, ISSN, Citescore, SCImago Journal Ranking (SJR), Aims & Scope, Publisher, and Other Important Metrics. Click to know more about Advances in Space Research Review Speed, Scope, Publication Fees, Submission Guidelines. Support +1 (833 ...
Stem cell research performed in space has shown potential ways microgravity can be leveraged to advance cellular therapeutics in space to benefit human life and commercial enterprise on Earth 7.
Advances in Space Research. Supports open access. 5 CiteScore. 2.6 Impact Factor. Articles & Issues. About. Publish. Order journal. Menu. Articles & Issues. ... Research article Full text access Impact of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai volcanic eruption on the changes observed over the Indian near-equatorial ionosphere.
Announcement of a Special Issue of Advances in Space Research on Astrophysics of Cosmic Rays. Papers are invited for a special topical issue of Advances in Space Research (ASR) entitled "Astrophysics of Cosmic Rays" Cosmic rays (CRs) are the only pieces of matter available to us that come from large Galactic and extragalactic distances.