Penn State University Libraries
Empirical research in the social sciences and education.
- What is Empirical Research and How to Read It
- Finding Empirical Research in Library Databases
- Designing Empirical Research
- Ethics, Cultural Responsiveness, and Anti-Racism in Research
- Citing, Writing, and Presenting Your Work
Contact the Librarian at your campus for more help!
Introduction: What is Empirical Research?
Empirical research is based on observed and measured phenomena and derives knowledge from actual experience rather than from theory or belief.
How do you know if a study is empirical? Read the subheadings within the article, book, or report and look for a description of the research "methodology." Ask yourself: Could I recreate this study and test these results?
Key characteristics to look for:
- Specific research questions to be answered
- Definition of the population, behavior, or phenomena being studied
- Description of the process used to study this population or phenomena, including selection criteria, controls, and testing instruments (such as surveys)
Another hint: some scholarly journals use a specific layout, called the "IMRaD" format, to communicate empirical research findings. Such articles typically have 4 components:
- Introduction: sometimes called "literature review" -- what is currently known about the topic -- usually includes a theoretical framework and/or discussion of previous studies
- Methodology: sometimes called "research design" -- how to recreate the study -- usually describes the population, research process, and analytical tools used in the present study
- Results: sometimes called "findings" -- what was learned through the study -- usually appears as statistical data or as substantial quotations from research participants
- Discussion: sometimes called "conclusion" or "implications" -- why the study is important -- usually describes how the research results influence professional practices or future studies
Reading and Evaluating Scholarly Materials
Reading research can be a challenge. However, the tutorials and videos below can help. They explain what scholarly articles look like, how to read them, and how to evaluate them:
- CRAAP Checklist A frequently-used checklist that helps you examine the currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose of an information source.
- IF I APPLY A newer model of evaluating sources which encourages you to think about your own biases as a reader, as well as concerns about the item you are reading.
- Credo Video: How to Read Scholarly Materials (4 min.)
- Credo Tutorial: How to Read Scholarly Materials
- Credo Tutorial: Evaluating Information
- Credo Video: Evaluating Statistics (4 min.)
- Credo Tutorial: Evaluating for Diverse Points of View
- Next: Finding Empirical Research in Library Databases >>
- Last Updated: Aug 13, 2024 3:16 PM
- URL: https://guides.libraries.psu.edu/emp
- Books, Journals, Papers
- Guides & How To’s
- Life Around The World
- Research Methods
- Functionalism
- Postmodernism
- Social Constructionism
- Structuralism
- Symbolic Interactionism
- Sociology Theorists
- General Sociology
- Social Policy
- Social Work
- Sociology of Childhood
- Sociology of Crime & Deviance
- Sociology of Art
- Sociology of Dance
- Sociology of Food
- Sociology of Sport
- Sociology of Disability
- Sociology of Economics
- Sociology of Education
- Sociology of Emotion
- Sociology of Family & Relationships
- Sociology of Gender
- Sociology of Health
- Sociology of Identity
- Sociology of Ideology
- Sociology of Inequalities
- Sociology of Knowledge
- Sociology of Language
- Sociology of Law
- Sociology of Anime
- Sociology of Film
- Sociology of Gaming
- Sociology of Literature
- Sociology of Music
- Sociology of TV
- Sociology of Migration
- Sociology of Nature & Environment
- Sociology of Politics
- Sociology of Power
- Sociology of Race & Ethnicity
- Sociology of Religion
- Sociology of Sexuality
- Sociology of Social Movements
- Sociology of Technology
- Sociology of the Life Course
- Sociology of Travel & Tourism
- Sociology of Violence & Conflict
- Sociology of Work
- Urban Sociology
- Changing Relationships Within Families
- Conjugal Role Relationships
- Criticisms of Families
- Family Forms
- Functions of the Family
- Featured Articles
- Privacy Policy
- Terms & Conditions
Understanding the Meaning of Empirical in Sociology
Table of Contents
Defining empirical, the role of empirical research in sociology.
- Methodological Approaches in Empirical Research
- Analyzing Empirical Data
- Challenges and Ethical Considerations
In the realm of sociology, the term “empirical” holds a significant place. It is crucial for students to comprehend its meaning, relevance, and application within the field. Empirical research forms the backbone of sociological inquiry, grounding theoretical perspectives in observable and measurable phenomena. This essay will outline and explain the concept of “empirical” in sociology, providing an academic discussion suitable for an undergraduate audience.
What is Empirical?
The term “empirical” originates from the Greek word “empeiria,” meaning experience. In the context of sociology, empirical refers to knowledge derived from systematic observation, experimentation, or measurement rather than from theory or logic alone. Empirical research relies on evidence that is observable and verifiable by others, making it a cornerstone of the scientific method.
Empirical vs. Theoretical
Empirical research contrasts with theoretical research, which involves developing hypotheses and models to explain social phenomena without necessarily relying on direct observation or experimentation. While theoretical frameworks are essential for understanding broader social structures and processes, empirical research tests these theories against real-world data. This symbiotic relationship ensures that sociological theories remain grounded in reality and that empirical findings contribute to refining theoretical models.
Foundations of Sociological Inquiry
Empirical research is foundational to sociological inquiry for several reasons:
- Validation of Theories: It allows sociologists to test and validate theoretical propositions, ensuring they accurately reflect social realities.
- Evidence-Based Practice: Empirical research provides the evidence base for developing policies and interventions aimed at addressing social issues.
- Objectivity: By relying on observable and measurable data, empirical research helps mitigate bias, promoting objectivity in sociological studies.
Types of Empirical Research
Membership required.
You must be a member to access this content.
View Membership Levels
Mr Edwards has a PhD in sociology and 10 years of experience in sociological knowledge
Related Articles
Ideographic Versus Nomothetic Approaches
In the field of sociology, the methodologies employed to understand social phenomena can be broadly categorized into two distinct approaches:...
Fallacy of Composition
The fallacy of composition is a common logical error that occurs when one assumes that what is true for an...
Emotion Work: A Sociological Perspective
Understanding the Concept of ‘Elite’ in Sociology
Emergence: A Sociological Exploration
Get the latest sociology.
How would you rate the content on Easy Sociology?
Recommended
The Postmodernist View of Politics: An Outline and Explanation
Holism: An Overview
24 hour trending.
Robert Merton’s Strain Theory Explained
Functionalism: an introduction, understanding conflict theories in sociology, pierre bourdieu’s symbolic violence: an outline and explanation, the marxist view of crime and deviance: an outline, explanation, and analysis.
Easy Sociology makes sociology as easy as possible. Our aim is to make sociology accessible for everybody. © 2023 Easy Sociology
© 2023 Easy Sociology
- University of Memphis Libraries
- Research Guides
Empirical Research: Defining, Identifying, & Finding
Defining empirical research, what is empirical research, quantitative or qualitative.
- Introduction
- Database Tools
- Search Terms
- Image Descriptions
Calfee & Chambliss (2005) (UofM login required) describe empirical research as a "systematic approach for answering certain types of questions." Those questions are answered "[t]hrough the collection of evidence under carefully defined and replicable conditions" (p. 43).
The evidence collected during empirical research is often referred to as "data."
Characteristics of Empirical Research
Emerald Publishing's guide to conducting empirical research identifies a number of common elements to empirical research:
- A research question , which will determine research objectives.
- A particular and planned design for the research, which will depend on the question and which will find ways of answering it with appropriate use of resources.
- The gathering of primary data , which is then analysed.
- A particular methodology for collecting and analysing the data, such as an experiment or survey.
- The limitation of the data to a particular group, area or time scale, known as a sample [emphasis added]: for example, a specific number of employees of a particular company type, or all users of a library over a given time scale. The sample should be somehow representative of a wider population.
- The ability to recreate the study and test the results. This is known as reliability .
- The ability to generalize from the findings to a larger sample and to other situations.
If you see these elements in a research article, you can feel confident that you have found empirical research. Emerald's guide goes into more detail on each element.
Empirical research methodologies can be described as quantitative, qualitative, or a mix of both (usually called mixed-methods).
Ruane (2016) (UofM login required) gets at the basic differences in approach between quantitative and qualitative research:
- Quantitative research -- an approach to documenting reality that relies heavily on numbers both for the measurement of variables and for data analysis (p. 33).
- Qualitative research -- an approach to documenting reality that relies on words and images as the primary data source (p. 33).
Both quantitative and qualitative methods are empirical . If you can recognize that a research study is quantitative or qualitative study, then you have also recognized that it is empirical study.
Below are information on the characteristics of quantitative and qualitative research. This video from Scribbr also offers a good overall introduction to the two approaches to research methodology:
Characteristics of Quantitative Research
Researchers test hypotheses, or theories, based in assumptions about causality, i.e. we expect variable X to cause variable Y. Variables have to be controlled as much as possible to ensure validity. The results explain the relationship between the variables. Measures are based in pre-defined instruments.
Examples: experimental or quasi-experimental design, pretest & post-test, survey or questionnaire with closed-ended questions. Studies that identify factors that influence an outcomes, the utility of an intervention, or understanding predictors of outcomes.
Characteristics of Qualitative Research
Researchers explore “meaning individuals or groups ascribe to social or human problems (Creswell & Creswell, 2018, p3).” Questions and procedures emerge rather than being prescribed. Complexity, nuance, and individual meaning are valued. Research is both inductive and deductive. Data sources are multiple and varied, i.e. interviews, observations, documents, photographs, etc. The researcher is a key instrument and must be reflective of their background, culture, and experiences as influential of the research.
Examples: open question interviews and surveys, focus groups, case studies, grounded theory, ethnography, discourse analysis, narrative, phenomenology, participatory action research.
Calfee, R. C. & Chambliss, M. (2005). The design of empirical research. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire, & J. Jensen (Eds.), Methods of research on teaching the English language arts: The methodology chapters from the handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 43-78). Routledge. http://ezproxy.memphis.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=125955&site=eds-live&scope=site .
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
How to... conduct empirical research . (n.d.). Emerald Publishing. https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/how-to/research-methods/conduct-empirical-research .
Scribbr. (2019). Quantitative vs. qualitative: The differences explained [video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-XtVF7Bofg .
Ruane, J. M. (2016). Introducing social research methods : Essentials for getting the edge . Wiley-Blackwell. http://ezproxy.memphis.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1107215&site=eds-live&scope=site .
- << Previous: Home
- Next: Identifying Empirical Research >>
- Last Updated: Apr 2, 2024 11:25 AM
- URL: https://libguides.memphis.edu/empirical-research
2.1 Approaches to Sociological Research
Learning objectives.
By the end of this section, you should be able to:
- Define and describe the scientific method.
- Explain how the scientific method is used in sociological research.
- Describe the function and importance of an interpretive framework.
- Describe the differences in accuracy, reliability and validity in a research study.
When sociologists apply the sociological perspective and begin to ask questions, no topic is off limits. Every aspect of human behavior is a source of possible investigation. Sociologists question the world that humans have created and live in. They notice patterns of behavior as people move through that world. Using sociological methods and systematic research within the framework of the scientific method and a scholarly interpretive perspective, sociologists have discovered social patterns in the workplace that have transformed industries, in families that have enlightened family members, and in education that have aided structural changes in classrooms.
Sociologists often begin the research process by asking a question about how or why things happen in this world. It might be a unique question about a new trend or an old question about a common aspect of life. Once the question is formed, the sociologist proceeds through an in-depth process to answer it. In deciding how to design that process, the researcher may adopt a scientific approach or an interpretive framework. The following sections describe these approaches to knowledge.
The Scientific Method
Sociologists make use of tried and true methods of research, such as experiments, surveys, and field research. But humans and their social interactions are so diverse that these interactions can seem impossible to chart or explain. It might seem that science is about discoveries and chemical reactions or about proving ideas right or wrong rather than about exploring the nuances of human behavior.
However, this is exactly why scientific models work for studying human behavior. A scientific process of research establishes parameters that help make sure results are objective and accurate. Scientific methods provide limitations and boundaries that focus a study and organize its results.
The scientific method involves developing and testing theories about the social world based on empirical evidence. It is defined by its commitment to systematic observation of the empirical world and strives to be objective, critical, skeptical, and logical. It involves a series of six prescribed steps that have been established over centuries of scientific scholarship.
Sociological research does not reduce knowledge to right or wrong facts. Results of studies tend to provide people with insights they did not have before—explanations of human behaviors and social practices and access to knowledge of other cultures, rituals and beliefs, or trends and attitudes.
In general, sociologists tackle questions about the role of social characteristics in outcomes or results. For example, how do different communities fare in terms of psychological well-being, community cohesiveness, range of vocation, wealth, crime rates, and so on? Are communities functioning smoothly? Sociologists often look between the cracks to discover obstacles to meeting basic human needs. They might also study environmental influences and patterns of behavior that lead to crime, substance abuse, divorce, poverty, unplanned pregnancies, or illness. And, because sociological studies are not all focused on negative behaviors or challenging situations, social researchers might study vacation trends, healthy eating habits, neighborhood organizations, higher education patterns, games, parks, and exercise habits.
Sociologists can use the scientific method not only to collect but also to interpret and analyze data. They deliberately apply scientific logic and objectivity. They are interested in—but not attached to—the results. They work outside of their own political or social agendas. This does not mean researchers do not have their own personalities, complete with preferences and opinions. But sociologists deliberately use the scientific method to maintain as much objectivity, focus, and consistency as possible in collecting and analyzing data in research studies.
With its systematic approach, the scientific method has proven useful in shaping sociological studies. The scientific method provides a systematic, organized series of steps that help ensure objectivity and consistency in exploring a social problem. They provide the means for accuracy, reliability, and validity. In the end, the scientific method provides a shared basis for discussion and analysis (Merton 1963). Typically, the scientific method has 6 steps which are described below.
Step 1: Ask a Question or Find a Research Topic
The first step of the scientific method is to ask a question, select a problem, and identify the specific area of interest. The topic should be narrow enough to study within a geographic location and time frame. “Are societies capable of sustained happiness?” would be too vague. The question should also be broad enough to have universal merit. “What do personal hygiene habits reveal about the values of students at XYZ High School?” would be too narrow. Sociologists strive to frame questions that examine well-defined patterns and relationships.
In a hygiene study, for instance, hygiene could be defined as “personal habits to maintain physical appearance (as opposed to health),” and a researcher might ask, “How do differing personal hygiene habits reflect the cultural value placed on appearance?”
Step 2: Review the Literature/Research Existing Sources
The next step researchers undertake is to conduct background research through a literature review , which is a review of any existing similar or related studies. A visit to the library, a thorough online search, and a survey of academic journals will uncover existing research about the topic of study. This step helps researchers gain a broad understanding of work previously conducted, identify gaps in understanding of the topic, and position their own research to build on prior knowledge. Researchers—including student researchers—are responsible for correctly citing existing sources they use in a study or that inform their work. While it is fine to borrow previously published material (as long as it enhances a unique viewpoint), it must be referenced properly and never plagiarized.
To study crime, a researcher might also sort through existing data from the court system, police database, prison information, interviews with criminals, guards, wardens, etc. It’s important to examine this information in addition to existing research to determine how these resources might be used to fill holes in existing knowledge. Reviewing existing sources educates researchers and helps refine and improve a research study design.
Step 3: Formulate a Hypothesis
A hypothesis is an explanation for a phenomenon based on a conjecture about the relationship between the phenomenon and one or more causal factors. In sociology, the hypothesis will often predict how one form of human behavior influences another. For example, a hypothesis might be in the form of an “if, then statement.” Let’s relate this to our topic of crime: If unemployment increases, then the crime rate will increase.
In scientific research, we formulate hypotheses to include an independent variables (IV) , which are the cause of the change, and a dependent variable (DV) , which is the effect , or thing that is changed. In the example above, unemployment is the independent variable and the crime rate is the dependent variable.
In a sociological study, the researcher would establish one form of human behavior as the independent variable and observe the influence it has on a dependent variable. How does gender (the independent variable) affect rate of income (the dependent variable)? How does one’s religion (the independent variable) affect family size (the dependent variable)? How is social class (the dependent variable) affected by level of education (the independent variable)?
Hypothesis | Independent Variable | Dependent Variable |
---|---|---|
The greater the availability of affordable housing, the lower the homeless rate. | Affordable Housing | Homeless Rate |
The greater the availability of math tutoring, the higher the math grades. | Math Tutoring | Math Grades |
The greater the police patrol presence, the safer the neighborhood. | Police Patrol Presence | Safer Neighborhood |
The greater the factory lighting, the higher the productivity. | Factory Lighting | Productivity |
The greater the amount of media coverage, the higher the public awareness. | Observation | Public Awareness |
Taking an example from Table 12.1, a researcher might hypothesize that teaching children proper hygiene (the independent variable) will boost their sense of self-esteem (the dependent variable). Note, however, this hypothesis can also work the other way around. A sociologist might predict that increasing a child’s sense of self-esteem (the independent variable) will increase or improve habits of hygiene (now the dependent variable). Identifying the independent and dependent variables is very important. As the hygiene example shows, simply identifying related two topics or variables is not enough. Their prospective relationship must be part of the hypothesis.
Step 4: Design and Conduct a Study
Researchers design studies to maximize reliability , which refers to how likely research results are to be replicated if the study is reproduced. Reliability increases the likelihood that what happens to one person will happen to all people in a group or what will happen in one situation will happen in another. Cooking is a science. When you follow a recipe and measure ingredients with a cooking tool, such as a measuring cup, the same results is obtained as long as the cook follows the same recipe and uses the same type of tool. The measuring cup introduces accuracy into the process. If a person uses a less accurate tool, such as their hand, to measure ingredients rather than a cup, the same result may not be replicated. Accurate tools and methods increase reliability.
Researchers also strive for validity , which refers to how well the study measures what it was designed to measure. To produce reliable and valid results, sociologists develop an operational definition , that is, they define each concept, or variable, in terms of the physical or concrete steps it takes to objectively measure it. The operational definition identifies an observable condition of the concept. By operationalizing the concept, all researchers can collect data in a systematic or replicable manner. Moreover, researchers can determine whether the experiment or method validly represent the phenomenon they intended to study.
A study asking how tutoring improves grades, for instance, might define “tutoring” as “one-on-one assistance by an expert in the field, hired by an educational institution.” However, one researcher might define a “good” grade as a C or better, while another uses a B+ as a starting point for “good.” For the results to be replicated and gain acceptance within the broader scientific community, researchers would have to use a standard operational definition. These definitions set limits and establish cut-off points that ensure consistency and replicability in a study.
We will explore research methods in greater detail in the next section of this chapter.
Step 5: Draw Conclusions
After constructing the research design, sociologists collect, tabulate or categorize, and analyze data to formulate conclusions. If the analysis supports the hypothesis, researchers can discuss the implications of the results for the theory or policy solution that they were addressing. If the analysis does not support the hypothesis, researchers may consider repeating the experiment or think of ways to improve their procedure.
However, even when results contradict a sociologist’s prediction of a study’s outcome, these results still contribute to sociological understanding. Sociologists analyze general patterns in response to a study, but they are equally interested in exceptions to patterns. In a study of education, a researcher might predict that high school dropouts have a hard time finding rewarding careers. While many assume that the higher the education, the higher the salary and degree of career happiness, there are certainly exceptions. People with little education have had stunning careers, and people with advanced degrees have had trouble finding work. A sociologist prepares a hypothesis knowing that results may substantiate or contradict it.
Sociologists carefully keep in mind how operational definitions and research designs impact the results as they draw conclusions. Consider the concept of “increase of crime,” which might be defined as the percent increase in crime from last week to this week, as in the study of Swedish crime discussed above. Yet the data used to evaluate “increase of crime” might be limited by many factors: who commits the crime, where the crimes are committed, or what type of crime is committed. If the data is gathered for “crimes committed in Houston, Texas in zip code 77021,” then it may not be generalizable to crimes committed in rural areas outside of major cities like Houston. If data is collected about vandalism, it may not be generalizable to assault.
Step 6: Report Results
Researchers report their results at conferences and in academic journals. These results are then subjected to the scrutiny of other sociologists in the field. Before the conclusions of a study become widely accepted, the studies are often repeated in the same or different environments. In this way, sociological theories and knowledge develops as the relationships between social phenomenon are established in broader contexts and different circumstances.
Interpretive Framework
While many sociologists rely on empirical data and the scientific method as a research approach, others operate from an interpretive framework . While systematic, this approach doesn’t follow the hypothesis-testing model that seeks to find generalizable results. Instead, an interpretive framework, sometimes referred to as an interpretive perspective , seeks to understand social worlds from the point of view of participants, which leads to in-depth knowledge or understanding about the human experience.
Interpretive research is generally more descriptive or narrative in its findings. Rather than formulating a hypothesis and method for testing it, an interpretive researcher will develop approaches to explore the topic at hand that may involve a significant amount of direct observation or interaction with subjects including storytelling. This type of researcher learns through the process and sometimes adjusts the research methods or processes midway to optimize findings as they evolve.
Critical Sociology
Critical sociology focuses on deconstruction of existing sociological research and theory. Informed by the work of Karl Marx, scholars known collectively as the Frankfurt School proposed that social science, as much as any academic pursuit, is embedded in the system of power constituted by the set of class, caste, race, gender, and other relationships that exist in the society. Consequently, it cannot be treated as purely objective. Critical sociologists view theories, methods, and the conclusions as serving one of two purposes: they can either legitimate and rationalize systems of social power and oppression or liberate humans from inequality and restriction on human freedom. Deconstruction can involve data collection, but the analysis of this data is not empirical or positivist.
This book may not be used in the training of large language models or otherwise be ingested into large language models or generative AI offerings without OpenStax's permission.
Want to cite, share, or modify this book? This book uses the Creative Commons Attribution License and you must attribute OpenStax.
Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/1-introduction
- Authors: Tonja R. Conerly, Kathleen Holmes, Asha Lal Tamang
- Publisher/website: OpenStax
- Book title: Introduction to Sociology 3e
- Publication date: Jun 3, 2021
- Location: Houston, Texas
- Book URL: https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/1-introduction
- Section URL: https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/2-1-approaches-to-sociological-research
© Aug 5, 2024 OpenStax. Textbook content produced by OpenStax is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License . The OpenStax name, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax CNX name, and OpenStax CNX logo are not subject to the Creative Commons license and may not be reproduced without the prior and express written consent of Rice University.
The Empirical Approach in Social Research: A Deep Dive
Table of Contents
Have you ever wondered how social scientists gather the factual data that shapes our understanding of human behavior? The empirical approach in social research is a cornerstone methodology that answers this question. This method, rooted in observation and firsthand collection, is pivotal in how researchers uncover the complexities of the societies we live in. Let’s delve into this fascinating process and discover how it has transformed from historical anecdotal accounts to rigorous scientific inquiry.
What is the empirical approach in social research?
The empirical approach is fundamentally about evidence. It mandates that any conclusions about human society should be rooted in data gathered through direct observation or experience. Unlike theoretical research that might rely on abstract reasoning or predictive models, empirical research seeks concrete, observable data as its foundation.
Key characteristics of empirical research
- Observational data collection: Researchers observe subjects in natural or controlled environments to gather data.
- Experimentation: Empirical research often involves experiments that test hypotheses under controlled conditions.
- Quantitative and qualitative data : It can involve numbers and statistics (quantitative) or non-numerical data like interviews and observations (qualitative).
Transition from anecdotal to scientific collection
The history of social research is filled with stories of travelers, missionaries, and administrators who collected information about different societies. However, this anecdotal method often lacked systematic techniques for verification. Over time, the need for a more reliable approach gave rise to the development of the empirical method, which is characterized by specific rules for authenticity and replicability. This transition has greatly enhanced the credibility and usefulness of social research data.
From travelers’ tales to empirical evidence
- Early data collection: Initially, observations by travelers and missionaries were subjective and often bias ed, influenced by personal perspectives.
- Systematization of methods: The empirical approach demanded a systematic method to collect and analyze data, reducing bias and increasing reliability .
- Rules for authenticity: Clear guidelines and ethical considerations were established to ensure that the data could be trusted and replicated by other researchers.
The scientific collection of social data
Today’s empirical social research is a highly systematic and meticulous process. Researchers design studies to answer specific questions about human societies, employing various tools and methods to collect data that are both comprehensive and precise.
Tools and techniques in empirical research
- Surveys and questionnaires: These are used to gather large amounts of data from a significant sample size of a population.
- Field experiments: Researchers conduct experiments in real-world settings to observe actual behaviors and outcomes.
- Statistical analysis: Advanced statistical techniques help in interpreting quantitative data and establishing patterns or correlations.
Ensuring authenticity in empirical research
Authenticity in empirical research is non-negotiable. Researchers must ensure that their findings are a true reflection of reality. This involves meticulous planning, transparent methodologies, and rigorous peer-review processes.
Validity and reliability
- Validity: The extent to which the research truly measures what it was intended to measure.
- Reliability: The degree to which research can be replicated with the same results, highlighting consistency in the findings.
Challenges and solutions in empirical social research
While the empirical approach is powerful, it’s not without its challenges. Issues like subjectivity, ethical considerations, and the dynamic nature of human societies can influence the outcomes of empirical research.
Overcoming challenges in empirical research
- Minimizing bias: Researchers use blind or double-blind study designs to reduce the potential for bias.
- Adhering to ethics : Ethical guidelines ensure that research is conducted responsibly, respecting the rights and well-being of participants.
- Accounting for societal changes: Researchers must be adaptable, updating their methods as societies evolve to remain relevant and accurate.
Impact of empirical research on policy and society
The insights garnered from empirical social research have profound implications for policy-making and societal development. By providing data-driven evidence, these studies help shape informed decisions that affect education, healthcare, economic policies, and more.
Influencing decision-making with empirical evidence
- Informing policy: Empirical data is used by governments and organizations to craft policies that are more likely to succeed because they are based on observed realities.
- Understanding social phenomena : Empirical research sheds light on complex social issues, allowing for targeted interventions.
- Driving social change : Empirical findings can inspire movements and social change by highlighting areas that require attention or improvement.
The empirical approach in social research has evolved significantly from its early days of anecdotal evidence to become a bedrock of scientific inquiry. Through careful observation, rigorous methodology, and an unwavering commitment to authenticity, researchers are able to bring to light the nuanced workings of human societies. This, in turn, informs policies and interventions that aim to improve the human condition. As we continue to navigate an ever-changing social landscape, the empirical approach remains an invaluable tool in our quest to understand and better the world we live in.
What do you think? How do you see the role of empirical research evolving with technological advancements? Can you think of any current social issues that would benefit from an empirical research approach?
Submit a Comment Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Submit Comment
Research Methodologies & Methods
1 Logic of Inquiry in Social Research
- A Science of Society
- Comte’s Ideas on the Nature of Sociology
- Observation in Social Sciences
- Logical Understanding of Social Reality
2 Empirical Approach
- Empirical Approach
- Rules of Data Collection
- Cultural Relativism
- Problems Encountered in Data Collection
- Difference between Common Sense and Science
- What is Ethical?
- What is Normal?
- Understanding the Data Collected
- Managing Diversities in Social Research
- Problematising the Object of Study
- Conclusion: Return to Good Old Empirical Approach
3 Diverse Logic of Theory Building
- Concern with Theory in Sociology
- Concepts: Basic Elements of Theories
- Why Do We Need Theory?
- Hypothesis Description and Experimentation
- Controlled Experiment
- Designing an Experiment
- How to Test a Hypothesis
- Sensitivity to Alternative Explanations
- Rival Hypothesis Construction
- The Use and Scope of Social Science Theory
- Theory Building and Researcher’s Values
4 Theoretical Analysis
- Premises of Evolutionary and Functional Theories
- Critique of Evolutionary and Functional Theories
- Turning away from Functionalism
- What after Functionalism
- Post-modernism
- Trends other than Post-modernism
5 Issues of Epistemology
- Some Major Concerns of Epistemology
- Rationalism
- Phenomenology: Bracketing Experience
6 Philosophy of Social Science
- Foundations of Science
- Science, Modernity, and Sociology
- Rethinking Science
- Crisis in Foundation
7 Positivism and its Critique
- Heroic Science and Origin of Positivism
- Early Positivism
- Consolidation of Positivism
- Critiques of Positivism
8 Hermeneutics
- Methodological Disputes in the Social Sciences
- Tracing the History of Hermeneutics
- Hermeneutics and Sociology
- Philosophical Hermeneutics
- The Hermeneutics of Suspicion
- Phenomenology and Hermeneutics
9 Comparative Method
- Relationship with Common Sense; Interrogating Ideological Location
- The Historical Context
- Elements of the Comparative Approach
10 Feminist Approach
- Features of the Feminist Method
- Feminist Methods adopt the Reflexive Stance
- Feminist Discourse in India
11 Participatory Method
- Delineation of Key Features
12 Types of Research
- Basic and Applied Research
- Descriptive and Analytical Research
- Empirical and Exploratory Research
- Quantitative and Qualitative Research
- Explanatory (Causal) and Longitudinal Research
- Experimental and Evaluative Research
- Participatory Action Research
13 Methods of Research
- Evolutionary Method
- Comparative Method
- Historical Method
- Personal Documents
14 Elements of Research Design
- Structuring the Research Process
15 Sampling Methods and Estimation of Sample Size
- Classification of Sampling Methods
- Sample Size
16 Measures of Central Tendency
- Relationship between Mean, Mode, and Median
- Choosing a Measure of Central Tendency
17 Measures of Dispersion and Variability
- The Variance
- The Standard Deviation
- Coefficient of Variation
18 Statistical Inference- Tests of Hypothesis
- Statistical Inference
- Tests of Significance
19 Correlation and Regression
- Correlation
- Method of Calculating Correlation of Ungrouped Data
- Method Of Calculating Correlation Of Grouped Data
20 Survey Method
- Rationale of Survey Research Method
- History of Survey Research
- Defining Survey Research
- Sampling and Survey Techniques
- Operationalising Survey Research Tools
- Advantages and Weaknesses of Survey Research
21 Survey Design
- Preliminary Considerations
- Stages / Phases in Survey Research
- Formulation of Research Question
- Survey Research Designs
- Sampling Design
22 Survey Instrumentation
- Techniques/Instruments for Data Collection
- Questionnaire Construction
- Issues in Designing a Survey Instrument
23 Survey Execution and Data Analysis
- Problems and Issues in Executing Survey Research
- Data Analysis
- Ethical Issues in Survey Research
24 Field Research – I
- History of Field Research
- Ethnography
- Theme Selection
- Gaining Entry in the Field
- Key Informants
- Participant Observation
25 Field Research – II
- Interview its Types and Process
- Feminist and Postmodernist Perspectives on Interviewing
- Narrative Analysis
- Interpretation
- Case Study and its Types
- Life Histories
- Oral History
- PRA and RRA Techniques
26 Reliability, Validity and Triangulation
- Concepts of Reliability and Validity
- Three Types of “Reliability”
- Working Towards Reliability
- Procedural Validity
- Field Research as a Validity Check
- Method Appropriate Criteria
- Triangulation
- Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research
27 Qualitative Data Formatting and Processing
- Qualitative Data Processing and Analysis
- Description
- Classification
- Making Connections
- Theoretical Coding
- Qualitative Content Analysis
28 Writing up Qualitative Data
- Problems of Writing Up
- Grasp and Then Render
- “Writing Down” and “Writing Up”
- Write Early
- Writing Styles
- First Draft
29 Using Internet and Word Processor
- What is Internet and How Does it Work?
- Internet Services
- Searching on the Web: Search Engines
- Accessing and Using Online Information
- Online Journals and Texts
- Statistical Reference Sites
- Data Sources
- Uses of E-mail Services in Research
30 Using SPSS for Data Analysis Contents
- Introduction
- Starting and Exiting SPSS
- Creating a Data File
- Univariate Analysis
- Bivariate Analysis
31 Using SPSS in Report Writing
- Why to Use SPSS
- Working with SPSS Output
- Copying SPSS Output to MS Word Document
32 Tabulation and Graphic Presentation- Case Studies
- Structure for Presentation of Research Findings
- Data Presentation: Editing, Coding, and Transcribing
- Case Studies
- Qualitative Data Analysis and Presentation through Software
- Types of ICT used for Research
33 Guidelines to Research Project Assignment
- Overview of Research Methodologies and Methods (MSO 002)
- Research Project Objectives
- Preparation for Research Project
- Stages of the Research Project
- Supervision During the Research Project
- Submission of Research Project
- Methodology for Evaluating Research Project
Share on Mastodon
- Getting Started
- Background Information
- Keywords & Database Searching
- Find Articles
- Find Books & eBooks
- Find Websites
- Other Resources
- Scholarly Sources
- Empirical Research
- Citing Sources
Ask a Librarian:
La Plata : 301-934-7676
Leonardtown : 240-725-5360
Prince Frederick : 443-550-6060
- Empirical Research by Amy Spitz Last Updated Aug 21, 2023 7839 views this year
What is an Empirical Article?
An empirical research article reports research based on actual observation or experiment. The research may use quantitative or qualitative research methods.
Quantitative Research uses numerical data to try to establish causal relationships between variables (“Based on 100 interactions, A causes B.”)
Qualitative Research objectively and critically analyzes behaviors, beliefs, feelings, or other values (“People suffering from Illness A tend to be more cautious.”)
Database Tools
When searching for empirical research articles, use database tools and extra keywords to help narrow your search.
Limit search to "Full Text" and "Peer Reviewed"
Limit search by source type (“Academic Journals” or “Scholarly Journals”)
Empirical Research Keywords
In addition to keywords for your topic, use words or phrases such as:
“study” or “studies”
“longitudinal study”
“research”
“observation”
“survey”
“experiment”
“findings”
“subjects” or “participants”
“participant group”
For more help with database searching and keywords, check out the Research Help library guide.
How to Identify an Empirical Article
What type of source is your article published in?
Popular Magazines ( Time , People , Psychology Today , WebMD , etc.): usually NOT empirical
Journals (Academic, Scholarly, Peer-reviewed, Professional): sometimes YES
An abstract is a brief summary or overview of the article. Abstracts for empirical research articles:
May describe a study, observation, or analysis
May mention participants or subjects, data, surveys, questionnaires, assessments, interviews, or other measurements
Empirical articles (and scholarly articles in general) are usually at least 5 pages (often up to 20 pages long).
Article Sections
Empirical articles may include headings or subheadings for sections such as:
Introduction
Literature Review
Methodology or Methods
Data & Analysis
Empirical research articles often include some sort of (quantitative and/or qualitative) data. This may be included in the article as charts, tables, graphs, or appendices.
Note: If you are not sure if an article is an empirical research article, share the article citation and abstract with your professor. This can help you to become better at recognizing the differences between empirical research and other types of scholarly articles, and also ensures your article is acceptable for the assignment.
- Empirical Research Printable handout with tips for searching for and identifying empirical research.
Empirical Research Articles [VIDEO]
- Empirical Articles [PDF] Slides from the Empirical Research Articles video.
Empirical Research Article: Example with Annotations
- << Previous: Scholarly Sources
- Next: Citing Sources >>
- Last Updated: Jul 31, 2024 11:22 AM
- URL: https://libguides.csmd.edu/sociology
Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.
Chapter 2. Sociological Research
Learning objectives.
2.1. Approaches to Sociological Research
- Define and describe the scientific method
- Explain how the scientific method is used in sociological research
- Understand the difference between positivist and interpretive approaches to the scientific method in sociology
- Define what reliability and validity mean in a research study
2.2. Research Methods
- Differentiate between four kinds of research methods: surveys, experiments, field research, and secondary data and textual analysis
- Understand why different topics are better suited to different research approaches
2.3. Ethical Concerns
- Understand why ethical standards exist
- Demonstrate awareness of the Canadian Sociological Association’s Code of Ethics
- Define value neutrality
- Outline some of the issues of value neutrality in sociology
Introduction to Sociological Research
In the university cafeteria, you set your lunch tray down at a table, grab a chair, join a group of your classmates, and hear the start of two discussions. One person says, “It’s weird how Justin Bieber has 48 million followers on Twitter.” Another says, “Disney World is packed year round.” Those two seemingly benign statements are claims, or opinions, based on everyday observation of human behaviour. Perhaps the speakers had firsthand experience, talked to experts, conducted online research, or saw news segments on TV. In response, two conversations erupt. “I don’t see why anyone would want to go to Disney World and stand in those long lines.” “Are you kidding?! Going to Disney World is one of my favourite childhood memories.” “It’s the opposite for me with Justin Bieber. Seeing people camp out outside his hotel just to get a glimpse of him; it doesn’t make sense.” “Well, you’re not a teenage girl.” “Going to a theme park is way different than trying to see a teenage heart throb.” “But both are things people do for the same reason: they’re looking for a good time.” “If you call getting crushed by a crowd of strangers fun.”
As your classmates at the lunch table discuss what they know or believe, the two topics converge. The conversation becomes a debate. Someone compares Beliebers to Beatles fans. Someone else compares Disney World to a cruise. Students take sides, agreeing or disagreeing, as the conversation veers to topics such as crowd control, mob mentality, political protests, and group dynamics. If you contributed your expanding knowledge of sociological research to this conversation, you might make statements like these: “Justin Bieber’s fans long for an escape from the boredom of real teenage life. Beliebers join together claiming they want romance, except what they really want is a safe place to explore the confusion of teenage sexual feelings.” And this: “Mickey Mouse is a larger-than-life cartoon celebrity. Disney World is a place where families go to see what it would be like to live inside a cartoon.” You finish lunch, clear away your tray, and hurry to your next class. But you are thinking of Justin Bieber and Disney World. You have a new perspective on human behaviour and a list of questions that you want answered. That is the purpose of sociological research—to investigate and provide insights into how human societies function.
Although claims and opinions are part of sociology, sociologists use empirical evidence (that is, evidence corroborated by direct experience and/or observation) combined with the scientific method or an interpretive framework to deliver sound sociological research. They also rely on a theoretical foundation that provides an interpretive perspective through which they can make sense of scientific results. A truly scientific sociological study of the social situations up for discussion in the cafeteria would involve these prescribed steps: defining a specific question, gathering information and resources through observation, forming a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis in a reproducible manner, analyzing and drawing conclusions from the data, publishing the results, and anticipating further development when future researchers respond to and retest findings.
An appropriate starting point in this case might be the question “What do fans of Justin Bieber seek that drives them to follow his Twitter comments so faithfully?” As you begin to think like a sociologist, you may notice that you have tapped into your observation skills. You might assume that your observations and insights are valuable and accurate. But the results of casual observation are limited by the fact that there is no standardization—who is to say one person’s observation of an event is any more accurate than another’s? To mediate these concerns, sociologists rely on systematic research processes.
When sociologists apply the sociological perspective and begin to ask questions, no topic is off limits. Every aspect of human behaviour is a source of possible investigation. Sociologists question the world that humans have created and live in. They notice patterns of behaviour as people move through that world. Using sociological methods and systematic research within the framework of the scientific method and a scholarly interpretive perspective, sociologists have discovered workplace patterns that have transformed industries, family patterns that have enlightened parents, and education patterns that have aided structural changes in classrooms. The students at that university cafeteria discussion put forth a few loosely stated opinions.
If the human behaviours around those claims were tested systematically, a student could write a report and offer the findings to fellow sociologists and the world in general. The new perspective could help people understand themselves and their neighbours and help people make better decisions about their lives. It might seem strange to use scientific practices to study social trends, but, as we shall see, it’s extremely helpful to rely on systematic approaches that research methods provide. Sociologists often begin the research process by asking a question about how or why things happen in this world. It might be a unique question about a new trend or an old question about a common aspect of life. Once a question is formed, a sociologist proceeds through an in-depth process to answer it. In deciding how to design that process, the researcher may adopt a positivist approach or an interpretive approach. The following sections describe these approaches to knowledge.
The Scientific Method
Sociologists make use of tried-and-true methods of research, such as experiments, surveys, field research, and textual analysis. But humans and their social interactions are so diverse that they can seem impossible to chart or explain. It might seem that science is about discoveries and chemical reactions or about proving ideas right or wrong rather than about exploring the nuances of human behaviour. However, this is exactly why scientific models work for studying human behaviour. A scientific process of research establishes parameters that help make sure results are objective and accurate. Scientific methods provide limitations and boundaries that focus a study and organize its results. This is the case for both positivist or quantitative methodologies and interpretive or qualitative methodologies. The scientific method involves developing and testing theories about the world based on empirical evidence. It is defined by its commitment to systematic observation of the empirical world and strives to be objective, critical, skeptical, and logical. It involves a series of prescribed steps that have been established over centuries of scholarship.
But just because sociological studies use scientific methods does not make the results less human. Sociological topics are not reduced to right or wrong facts. In this field, results of studies tend to provide people with access to knowledge they did not have before—knowledge of other cultures, knowledge of rituals and beliefs, knowledge of trends and attitudes. No matter what research approach is used, researchers want to maximize the study’s reliability (how likely research results are to be replicated if the study is reproduced). Reliability increases the likelihood that what is true of one person will be true of all people in a group. Researchers also strive for validity (how well the study measures what it was designed to measure).
Returning to the Disney World topic, reliability of a study would reflect how well the resulting experience represents the average experience of theme park-goers. Validity would ensure that the study’s design accurately examined what it was designed to study, so an exploration of adults’ interactions with costumed mascots should address that issue and not veer into other age groups’ interactions with them or into adult interactions with staff or other guests.
In general, sociologists tackle questions about the role of social characteristics in outcomes. For example, how do different communities fare in terms of psychological well-being, community cohesiveness, range of vocation, wealth, crime rates, and so on? Are communities functioning smoothly? Sociologists look between the cracks to discover obstacles to meeting basic human needs. They might study environmental influences and patterns of behaviour that lead to crime, substance abuse, divorce, poverty, unplanned pregnancies, or illness. And, because sociological studies are not all focused on problematic behaviours or challenging situations, researchers might study vacation trends, healthy eating habits, neighbourhood organizations, higher education patterns, games, parks, and exercise habits.
Sociologists can use the scientific method not only to collect but to interpret and analyze the data. They deliberately apply scientific logic and objectivity. They are interested in but not attached to the results. Their research work is independent of their own political or social beliefs. This does not mean researchers are not critical. Nor does it mean they do not have their own personalities, complete with preferences and opinions. But sociologists deliberately use the scientific method to maintain as much objectivity, focus, and consistency as possible in a particular study. With its systematic approach, the scientific method has proven useful in shaping sociological studies. The scientific method provides a systematic, organized series of steps that help ensure objectivity and consistency in exploring a social problem. They provide the means for accuracy, reliability, and validity. In the end, the scientific method provides a shared basis for discussion and analysis (Merton 1963). Typically, the scientific method starts with these steps—1) ask a question, 2) research existing sources, 3) formulate a hypothesis—described below.
Ask a Question
The first step of the scientific method is to ask a question, describe a problem, and identify the specific area of interest. The topic should be narrow enough to study within a geography and timeframe. “Are societies capable of sustained happiness?” would be too vague. The question should also be broad enough to have universal merit. “What do personal hygiene habits reveal about the values of students at XYZ High School?” would be too narrow. That said, happiness and hygiene are worthy topics to study.
Sociologists do not rule out any topic, but would strive to frame these questions in better research terms. That is why sociologists are careful to define their terms. In a hygiene study, for instance, hygiene could be defined as “personal habits to maintain physical appearance (as opposed to health),” and a researcher might ask, “How do differing personal hygiene habits reflect the cultural value placed on appearance?” When forming these basic research questions, sociologists develop an operational definition ; that is, they define the concept in terms of the physical or concrete steps it takes to objectively measure it. The concept is translated into an observable variable , a measure that has different values. The operational definition identifies an observable condition of the concept.
By operationalizing a variable of the concept, all researchers can collect data in a systematic or replicable manner. The operational definition must be valid in the sense that it is an appropriate and meaningful measure of the concept being studied. It must also be reliable, meaning that results will be close to uniform when tested on more than one person. For example, “good drivers” might be defined in many ways: those who use their turn signals, those who don’t speed, or those who courteously allow others to merge. But these driving behaviours could be interpreted differently by different researchers and could be difficult to measure. Alternatively, “a driver who has never received a traffic violation” is a specific description that will lead researchers to obtain the same information, so it is an effective operational definition.
Research Existing Sources
The next step researchers undertake is to conduct background research through a literature review , which is a review of any existing similar or related studies. A visit to the library and a thorough online search will uncover existing research about the topic of study. This step helps researchers gain a broad understanding of work previously conducted on the topic at hand and enables them to position their own research to build on prior knowledge. It allows them to sharpen the focus of their research question and avoid duplicating previous research. Researchers—including student researchers—are responsible for correctly citing existing sources they use in a study or that inform their work. While it is fine to build on previously published material (as long as it enhances a unique viewpoint), it must be referenced properly and never plagiarized. To study hygiene and its value in a particular society, a researcher might sort through existing research and unearth studies about childrearing, vanity, obsessive-compulsive behaviours, and cultural attitudes toward beauty. It’s important to sift through this information and determine what is relevant. Using existing sources educates a researcher and helps refine and improve a study’s design.
Formulate a Hypothesis
A hypothesis is an assumption about how two or more variables are related; it makes a conjectural statement about the relationship between those variables. It is an “educated guess” because it is not random but based on theory, observations, patterns of experience, or the existing literature. The hypothesis formulates this guess in the form of a testable proposition. However, how the hypothesis is handled differs between the positivist and interpretive approaches. Positivist methodologies are often referred to as hypothetico-deductive methodologies . A hypothesis is derived from a theoretical proposition. On the basis of the hypothesis a prediction or generalization is logically deduced. In positivist sociology, the hypothesis predicts how one form of human behaviour influences another.
Successful prediction will determine the adequacy of the hypothesis and thereby test the theoretical proposition. Typically positivist approaches operationalize variables as quantitative data ; that is, by translating a social phenomenon like “health” into a quantifiable or numerically measurable variable like “number of visits to the hospital.” This permits sociologists to formulate their predictions using mathematical language like regression formulas, to present research findings in graphs and tables, and to perform mathematical or statistical techniques to demonstrate the validity of relationships.
Variables are examined to see if there is a correlation between them. When a change in one variable coincides with a change in another variable there is a correlation. This does not necessarily indicate that changes in one variable causes a change in another variable, however, just that they are associated. A key distinction here is between independent and dependent variables. In research, independent variables are the cause of the change. The dependent variable is the effect , or thing that is changed. For example, in a basic study, the researcher would establish one form of human behaviour as the independent variable and observe the influence it has on a dependent variable. How does gender (the independent variable) affect rate of income (the dependent variable)? How does one’s religion (the independent variable) affect family size (the dependent variable)? How is social class (the dependent variable) affected by level of education (the independent variable)? For it to become possible to speak about causation, three criteria must be satisfied:
- There must be a relationship or correlation between the independent and dependent variables.
- The independent variable must be prior to the dependent variable.
- There must be no other intervening variable responsible for the causal relationship.
Table 2.1. Examples of Dependent and Independent Variables Typically, the independent variable causes the dependent variable to change in some way.
Hypothesis | Independent Variable | Dependent Variable |
---|---|---|
The greater the availability of affordable housing, the lower the homeless rate | Affordable Housing | Homeless Rate |
The greater the availability of math tutoring, the higher the math grades | Math Tutoring | Math Grades |
The greater the police patrol presence, the safer the neighbourhood | Police Patrol Presence | Safer Neighbourhood |
The greater the factory lighting, the higher the productivity | Factory Lighting | Productivity |
The greater the amount of public auditing, the lower the amount of political dishonesty | Auditing | Political dishonesty |
At this point, a researcher’s operational definitions help measure the variables. In a study asking how tutoring improves grades, for instance, one researcher might define “good” grades as a C or better, while another uses a B+ as a starting point for “good.” Another operational definition might describe “tutoring” as “one-on-one assistance by an expert in the field, hired by an educational institution.” Those definitions set limits and establish cut-off points, ensuring consistency and replicability in a study. As the chart shows, an independent variable is the one that causes a dependent variable to change. For example, a researcher might hypothesize that teaching children proper hygiene (the independent variable) will boost their sense of self-esteem (the dependent variable). Or rephrased, a child’s sense of self-esteem depends, in part, on the quality and availability of hygienic resources.
Of course, this hypothesis can also work the other way around. Perhaps a sociologist believes that increasing a child’s sense of self-esteem (the independent variable) will automatically increase or improve habits of hygiene (now the dependent variable). Identifying the independent and dependent variables is very important. As the hygiene example shows, simply identifying two topics, or variables, is not enough: Their prospective relationship must be part of the hypothesis. Just because a sociologist forms an educated prediction of a study’s outcome doesn’t mean data contradicting the hypothesis are not welcome. Sociologists analyze general patterns in response to a study, but they are equally interested in exceptions to patterns.
In a study of education, a researcher might predict that high school dropouts have a hard time finding a rewarding career. While it has become at least a cultural assumption that the higher the education, the higher the salary and degree of career happiness, there are certainly exceptions. People with little education have had stunning careers, and people with advanced degrees have had trouble finding work. A sociologist prepares a hypothesis knowing that results will vary.
While many sociologists rely on the positivist hypothetico-deductive method in their research, others operate from an interpretive approach . While systematic, this approach does not follow the hypothesis-testing model that seeks to make generalizable predictions from quantitative variables. Instead, an interpretive framework seeks to understand social worlds from the point of view of participants, leading to in-depth knowledge. It focuses on qualitative data, or the meanings that guide people’s behaviour. Rather than relying on quantitative instruments like questionnaires or experiments, which can be artificial, the interpretive approach attempts to find ways to get closer to the informants’ lived experience and perceptions. Interpretive research is generally more descriptive or narrative in its findings. It can begin from a deductive approach, by deriving a hypothesis from theory and then seeking to confirm it through methodologies like in-depth interviews.
However, it is ideally suited to an inductive approach in which the hypothesis emerges only after a substantial period of direct observation or interaction with subjects. This type of approach is exploratory in that the researcher also learns as he or she proceeds, sometimes adjusting the research methods or processes midway to respond to new insights and findings as they evolve. Once the preliminary work is done, it’s time for the next research steps: designing and conducting a study, and drawing conclusions. These research methods are discussed below.
Sociologists examine the world, see a problem or interesting pattern, and set out to study it. They use research methods to design a study—perhaps a positivist, quantitative method for conducting research and obtaining data, or perhaps an ethnographic study utilizing an interpretive framework. Planning the research design is a key step in any sociological study. When entering a particular social environment, a researcher must be careful. There are times to remain anonymous and times to be overt. There are times to conduct interviews and times to simply observe. Some participants need to be thoroughly informed; others should not know they are being observed. A researcher would not stroll into a crime-ridden neighbourhood at midnight, calling out, “Any gang members around?” And if a researcher walked into a coffee shop and told the employees they would be observed as part of a study on work efficiency, the self-conscious, intimidated baristas might not behave naturally.
In the 1920s, leaders of a Chicago factory called Hawthorne Works commissioned a study to determine whether or not changing certain aspects of working conditions could increase or decrease worker productivity. Sociologists were surprised when the productivity of a test group increased when the lighting of their workspace was improved. They were even more surprised when productivity improved when the lighting of the workspace was dimmed. In fact almost every change of independent variable—lighting, breaks, work hours—resulted in an improvement of productivity. But when the study was over, productivity dropped again.
Why did this happen? In 1953, Henry A. Landsberger analyzed the study results to answer this question. He realized that employees’ productivity increased because sociologists were paying attention to them. The sociologists’ presence influenced the study results. Worker behaviours were altered not by the lighting but by the study itself. From this, sociologists learned the importance of carefully planning their roles as part of their research design (Franke and Kaul 1978). Landsberger called the workers’ response the Hawthorne effect —people changing their behaviour because they know they are being watched as part of a study.
The Hawthorne effect is unavoidable in some research. In many cases, sociologists have to make the purpose of the study known for ethical reasons. Subjects must be aware that they are being observed, and a certain amount of artificiality may result (Sonnenfeld 1985). Making sociologists’ presence invisible is not always realistic for other reasons. That option is not available to a researcher studying prison behaviours, early education, or the Ku Klux Klan. Researchers cannot just stroll into prisons, kindergarten classrooms, or Ku Klux Klan meetings and unobtrusively observe behaviours. In situations like these, other methods are needed. All studies shape the research design, while research design simultaneously shapes the study. Researchers choose methods that best suit their study topic and that fit with their overall goal for the research.
In planning a study’s design, sociologists generally choose from four widely used methods of social investigation: survey, experiment, field research, and textual or secondary data analysis (or use of existing sources). Every research method comes with plusses and minuses, and the topic of study strongly influences which method or methods are put to use.
As a research method, a survey collects data from subjects who respond to a series of questions about behaviours and opinions, often in the form of a questionnaire. The survey is one of the most widely used positivist research methods. The standard survey format allows individuals a level of anonymity in which they can express personal ideas.
At some point or another, everyone responds to some type of survey. The Statistics Canada census is an excellent example of a large-scale survey intended to gather sociological data. Customers also fill out questionnaires at stores or promotional events, responding to questions such as “How did you hear about the event?” and “Were the staff helpful?” You’ve probably picked up the phone and heard a caller ask you to participate in a political poll or similar type of survey: “Do you eat hot dogs? If yes, how many per month?” Not all surveys would be considered sociological research. Marketing polls help companies refine marketing goals and strategies; they are generally not conducted as part of a scientific study, meaning they are not designed to test a hypothesis or to contribute knowledge to the field of sociology. The results are not published in a refereed scholarly journal, where design, methodology, results, and analyses are vetted.
Often, polls on TV do not reflect a general population, but are merely answers from a specific show’s audience. Polls conducted by programs such as American Idol or Canadian Idol represent the opinions of fans but are not particularly scientific. A good contrast to these are the BBM Ratings, which determine the popularity of radio and television programming in Canada through scientific market research. Sociologists conduct surveys under controlled conditions for specific purposes. Surveys gather different types of information from people. While surveys are not great at capturing the ways people really behave in social situations, they are a great method for discovering how people feel and think—or at least how they say they feel and think. Surveys can track attitudes and opinions, political preferences, reported individual behaviours (such as sleeping, driving, or texting habits), or factual information such as employment status, income, and education levels. A survey targets a specific population , people who are the focus of a study, such as university athletes, international students, or teenagers living with type 1 (juvenile-onset) diabetes.
Most researchers choose to survey a small sector of the population, or a sample : that is, a manageable number of subjects who represent a larger population. The success of a study depends on how well a population is represented by the sample. In a random sample , every person in a population has the same chance of being chosen for the study. According to the laws of probability, random samples represent the population as a whole. For instance, an Ipsos Reid poll, if conducted as a nationwide random sampling, should be able to provide an accurate estimate of public opinion whether it contacts 2,000 or 10,000 people. However the validity of surveys can be threatened when part of the population is inadvertently excluded from the sample (e.g., telephone surveys that rely on land lines exclude people that use only cell phones) or when there is a low response rate. After selecting subjects, the researcher develops a specific plan to ask questions and record responses.
It is important to inform subjects of the nature and purpose of the study upfront. If they agree to participate, researchers thank subjects and offer them a chance to see the results of the study if they are interested. The researcher presents the subjects with an instrument (a means of gathering the information). A common instrument is a structured questionnaire, in which subjects answer a series of set questions. For some topics, the researcher might ask yes-or-no or multiple-choice questions, allowing subjects to choose possible responses to each question.
This kind of quantitative data —research collected in numerical form that can be counted—is easy to tabulate. Just count up the number of “yes” and “no” answers or tabulate the scales of “strongly agree,” “agree,” disagree,” etc. responses and chart them into percentages. This is also their chief drawback however: their artificiality. In real life, there are rarely any unambiguously yes-or-no answers. Questionnaires can also ask more complex questions with more complex answers—beyond “yes,” “no,” “agree,” “strongly agree,” or an option next to a checkbox. In those cases, the answers are subjective, varying from person to person. How do you plan to use your university education? Why do you follow Justin Bieber around the country and attend every concert? Those types of questions require short essay responses, and participants willing to take the time to write those answers will convey personal information about religious beliefs, political views, and morals.
Some topics that reflect internal thought are impossible to observe directly and are difficult to discuss honestly in a public forum. People are more likely to share honest answers if they can respond to questions anonymously. This type of information is qualitative data —results that are subjective and often based on what is seen in a natural setting. Qualitative information is harder to organize and tabulate. The researcher will end up with a wide range of responses, some of which may be surprising. The benefit of written opinions, though, is the wealth of material that they provide.
An interview is a one-on-one conversation between the researcher and the subject, and is a way of conducting surveys on a topic. Interviews are similar to the short answer questions on surveys in that the researcher asks subjects a series of questions. However, participants are free to respond as they wish, without being limited by predetermined choices. In the back-and-forth conversation of an interview, a researcher can ask for clarification, spend more time on a subtopic, or ask additional questions. In an interview, a subject will ideally feel free to open up and answer questions that are often complex. There are no right or wrong answers. The subject might not even know how to answer the questions honestly. Questions such as “How did society’s view of alcohol consumption influence your decision whether or not to take your first sip of alcohol?” or “Did you feel that the divorce of your parents would put a social stigma on your family?” involve so many factors that the answers are difficult to categorize. A researcher needs to avoid steering or prompting the subject to respond in a specific way; otherwise, the results will prove to be unreliable. And, obviously, a sociological interview is not an interrogation. The researcher will benefit from gaining a subject’s trust, from empathizing or commiserating with a subject, and from listening without judgment.
Experiments
You’ve probably tested personal social theories. “If I study at night and review in the morning, I’ll improve my retention skills.” Or, “If I stop drinking soda, I’ll feel better.” Cause and effect. If this, then that. When you test the theory, your results either prove or disprove your hypothesis. One way researchers test social theories is by conducting an experiment , meaning they investigate relationships to test a hypothesis—a scientific approach. There are two main types of experiments: lab-based experiments and natural or field experiments.
In a lab setting, the research can be controlled so that perhaps more data can be recorded in a certain amount of time. In a natural or field-based experiment, the generation of data cannot be controlled but the information might be considered more accurate since it was collected without interference or intervention by the researcher. As a research method, either type of sociological experiment is useful for testing if-then statements: if a particular thing happens, then another particular thing will result.
To set up a lab-based experiment, sociologists create artificial situations that allow them to manipulate variables. Classically, the sociologist selects a set of people with similar characteristics, such as age, class, race, or education. Those people are divided into two groups. One is the experimental group and the other is the control group . The experimental group is exposed to the independent variable(s) and the control group is not. This is similar to pharmaceutical drug trials in which the experimental group is given the test drug and the control group is given a placebo or sugar pill. To test the benefits of tutoring, for example, the sociologist might expose the experimental group of students to tutoring while the control group does not receive tutoring. Then both groups would be tested for differences in performance to see if tutoring had an effect on the experimental group of students. As you can imagine, in a case like this, the researcher would not want to jeopardize the accomplishments of either group of students, so the setting would be somewhat artificial. The test would not be for a grade reflected on their permanent record, for example.
The Stanford Prison Experiment is perhaps one of the most famous sociological experiments ever conducted. In 1971, 24 healthy, middle-class male university students were selected to take part in a simulated jail environment to examine the effects of social setting and social roles on individual psychology and behaviour. They were randomly divided into 12 guards and 12 prisoners. The prisoner subjects were arrested at home and transported blindfolded to the simulated prison in the basement of the psychology building on the campus of Stanford University. Within a day of arriving the prisoners and the guards began to display signs of trauma and sadism respectively. After some prisoners revolted by blockading themselves in their cells, the guards resorted to using increasingly humiliating and degrading tactics to control the prisoners through psychological manipulation. The experiment had to be abandoned after only six days because the abuse had grown out of hand (Haney, Banks, and Zimbardo 1973). While the insights into the social dynamics of authoritarianism it generated were fascinating, the Stanford Prison Experiment also serves as an example of the ethical issues that emerge when experimenting on human subjects.
Making Connections: Sociological Research
An experiment in action: mincome.
A real-life example will help illustrate the experimental process in sociology. Between 1974 and 1979 an experiment was conducted in the small town of Dauphin, Manitoba (the “garden capital of Manitoba”). Each family received a modest monthly guaranteed income—a “mincome”—equivalent to a maximum of 60 percent of the “low-income cut-off figure” (a Statistics Canada measure of poverty, which varies with family size). The income was 50 cents per dollar less for families who had incomes from other sources. Families earning over a certain income level did not receive mincome. Families that were already collecting welfare or unemployment insurance were also excluded. The test families in Dauphin were compared with control groups in other rural Manitoba communities on a range of indicators such as number of hours worked per week, school performance, high school dropout rates, and hospital visits (Forget 2011). A guaranteed annual income was seen at the time as a less costly, less bureaucratic public alternative for addressing poverty than the existing employment insurance and welfare programs. Today it is an active proposal being considered in Switzerland (Lowrey 2013).
Intuitively, it seems logical that lack of income is the cause of poverty and poverty-related issues. One of the main concerns, however, was whether a guaranteed income would create a disincentive to work. The concept appears to challenge the principles of the Protestant work ethic (see the discussion of Max Weber in Chapter 1). The study did find very small decreases in hours worked per week: about 1 percent for men, 3 percent for wives, and 5 percent for unmarried women. Forget (2011) argues this was because the income provided an opportunity for people to spend more time with family and school, especially for young mothers and teenage girls. There were also significant social benefits from the experiment, including better test scores in school, lower high school dropout rates, fewer visits to hospital, fewer accidents and injuries, and fewer mental health issues.
Ironically, due to lack of guaranteed funding (and lack of political interest by the late 1970s), the data and results of the study were not analyzed or published until 2011. The data were archived and sat gathering dust in boxes. The mincome experiment demonstrated the benefits that even a modest guaranteed annual income supplement could have on health and social outcomes in communities. People seem to live healthier lives and get a better education when they do not need to worry about poverty. In her summary of the research, Forget notes that the impact of the income supplement was surprisingly large given that at any one time only about a third of the families were receiving the income and, for some families, the income amount would have been very small. The income benefit was largest for low-income working families but the research showed that the entire community profited. The improvement in overall health outcomes for the community suggest that a guaranteed income would also result in savings for the public health system.
Field Research
The work of sociology rarely happens in limited, confined spaces. Sociologists seldom study subjects in their own offices or laboratories. Rather, sociologists go out into the world. They meet subjects where they live, work, and play. Field research refers to gathering primary data from a natural environment without doing a lab experiment or a survey. It is a research method suited to an interpretive approach rather than to positivist approaches. To conduct field research, the sociologist must be willing to step into new environments and observe, participate, or experience those worlds. In fieldwork, the sociologists, rather than the subjects, are the ones out of their element. The researcher interacts with or observes a person or people, gathering data along the way. The key point in field research is that it takes place in the subject’s natural environment, whether it’s a coffee shop or tribal village, a homeless shelter or a care home, a hospital, airport, mall, or beach resort.
While field research often begins in a specific setting , the study’s purpose is to observe specific behaviours in that setting. Fieldwork is optimal for observing how people behave. It is less useful, however, for developing causal explanations of why they behave that way. From the small size of the groups studied in fieldwork, it is difficult to make predictions or generalizations to a larger population. Similarly, there are difficulties in gaining an objective distance from research subjects. It is difficult to know whether another researcher would see the same things or record the same data. We will look at three types of field research: participant observation, ethnography, and the case study.
Making Connections: Sociology in the Real World
When is sharing not such a good idea.
Choosing a research methodology depends on a number of factors, including the purpose of the research and the audience for whom the research is intended. If we consider the type of research that might go into producing a government policy document on the effectiveness of safe injection sites for reducing the public health risks of intravenous drug use, we would expect public administrators to want “hard” (i.e., quantitative) evidence of high reliability to help them make a policy decision. The most reliable data would come from an experimental or quasi-experimental research model in which a control group can be compared with an experimental group using quantitative measures.
This approach has been used by researchers studying InSite in Vancouver (Marshall et al. 2011; Wood et al. 2006). InSite is a supervised safe-injection site where heroin addicts and other intravenous drug users can go to inject drugs in a safe, clean environment. Clean needles are provided and health care professionals are on hand to intervene in the case of overdose or other medical emergency. It is a controversial program both because heroin use is against the law (the facility operates through a federal ministerial exemption) and because the heroin users are not obliged to quit using or seek therapy. To assess the effectiveness of the program, researchers compared the risky usage of drugs in populations before and after the opening of the facility and geographically near and distant to the facility. The results from the studies have shown that InSite has reduced both deaths from overdose and risky behaviours, such as the sharing of needles, without increasing the levels of crime associated with drug use and addiction.
On the other hand, if the research question is more exploratory (for example, trying to discern the reasons why individuals in the crack smoking subculture engage in the risky activity of sharing pipes), the more nuanced approach of fieldwork is more appropriate. The research would need to focus on the subcultural context, rituals, and meaning of sharing pipes, and why these phenomena override known health concerns. Graduate student Andrew Ivsins at the University of Victoria studied the practice of sharing pipes among 13 habitual users of crack cocaine in Victoria, B.C. (Ivsins 2010). He met crack smokers in their typical setting downtown and used an unstructured interview method to try to draw out the informal norms that lead to sharing pipes. One factor he discovered was the bond that formed between friends or intimate partners when they shared a pipe. He also discovered that there was an elaborate subcultural etiquette of pipe use that revolved around the benefit of getting the crack resin smokers left behind. Both of these motives tended to outweigh the recognized health risks of sharing pipes (such as hepatitis) in the decision making of the users. This type of research was valuable in illuminating the unknown subcultural norms of crack use that could still come into play in a harm reduction strategy such as distributing safe crack kits to addicts.
Participant Observation
In 2000, a comic writer named Rodney Rothman wanted an insider’s view of white-collar work. He slipped into the sterile, high-rise offices of a New York “dot com” agency. Every day for two weeks, he pretended to work there. His main purpose was simply to see if anyone would notice him or challenge his presence. No one did. The receptionist greeted him. The employees smiled and said good morning. Rothman was accepted as part of the team. He even went so far as to claim a desk, inform the receptionist of his whereabouts, and attend a meeting. He published an article about his experience in The New Yorker called “My Fake Job” (2000). Later, he was discredited for allegedly fabricating some details of the story and The New Yorker issued an apology. However, Rothman’s entertaining article still offered fascinating descriptions of the inside workings of a “dot com” company and exemplified the lengths to which a sociologist will go to uncover material.
Rothman had conducted a form of study called participant observation , in which researchers join people and participate in a group’s routine activities for the purpose of observing them within that context. This method lets researchers study a naturally occurring social activity without imposing artificial or intrusive research devices, like fixed questionnaire questions, onto the situation. A researcher might go to great lengths to get a firsthand look into a trend, institution, or behaviour. Researchers temporarily put themselves into “native” roles and record their observations. A researcher might work as a waitress in a diner, or live as a homeless person for several weeks, or ride along with police officers as they patrol their regular beat. Often, these researchers try to blend in seamlessly with the population they study, and they may not disclose their true identity or purpose if they feel it would compromise the results of their research.
At the beginning of a field study, researchers might have a question: “What really goes on in the kitchen of the most popular diner on campus?” or “What is it like to be homeless?” Participant observation is a useful method if the researcher wants to explore a certain environment from the inside. Field researchers simply want to observe and learn. In such a setting, the researcher will be alert and open minded to whatever happens, recording all observations accurately. Soon, as patterns emerge, questions will become more specific, observations will lead to hypotheses, and hypotheses will guide the researcher in shaping data into results. In a study of small-town America conducted by sociological researchers John S. Lynd and Helen Merrell Lynd, the team altered their purpose as they gathered data. They initially planned to focus their study on the role of religion in American towns. As they gathered observations, they realized that the effect of industrialization and urbanization was the more relevant topic of this social group. The Lynds did not change their methods, but they revised their purpose. This shaped the structure of Middletown: A Study in Modern American Culture , their published results (Lynd and Lynd 1959).
The Lynds were upfront about their mission. The townspeople of Muncie, Indiana, knew why the researchers were in their midst. But some sociologists prefer not to alert people to their presence. The main advantage of covert participant observation is that it allows the researcher access to authentic, natural behaviours of a group’s members. The challenge, however, is gaining access to a setting without disrupting the pattern of others’ behaviour. Becoming an inside member of a group, organization, or subculture takes time and effort. Researchers must pretend to be something they are not. The process could involve role playing, making contacts, networking, or applying for a job. Once inside a group, some researchers spend months or even years pretending to be one of the people they are observing. However, as observers, they cannot get too involved. They must keep their purpose in mind and apply the sociological perspective. That way, they illuminate social patterns that are often unrecognized. Because information gathered during participant observation is mostly qualitative, rather than quantitative, the end results are often descriptive or interpretive. The researcher might present findings in an article or book, describing what he or she witnessed and experienced.
This type of research is what journalist Barbara Ehrenreich conducted for her book Nickel and Dimed . One day over lunch with her editor, as the story goes, Ehrenreich mentioned an idea. How can people exist on minimum-wage work? How do low-income workers get by? she wondered. Someone should do a study. To her surprise, her editor responded, Why don’t you do it? That is how Ehrenreich found herself joining the ranks of the low-wage service sector. For several months, she left her comfortable home and lived and worked among people who lacked, for the most part, higher education and marketable job skills. Undercover, she applied for and worked minimum wage jobs as a waitress, a cleaning woman, a nursing home aide, and a retail chain employee. During her participant observation, she used only her income from those jobs to pay for food, clothing, transportation, and shelter. She discovered the obvious: that it’s almost impossible to get by on minimum wage work. She also experienced and observed attitudes many middle- and upper-class people never think about. She witnessed firsthand the treatment of service work employees. She saw the extreme measures people take to make ends meet and to survive. She described fellow employees who held two or three jobs, worked seven days a week, lived in cars, could not pay to treat chronic health conditions, got randomly fired, submitted to drug tests, and moved in and out of homeless shelters. She brought aspects of that life to light, describing difficult working conditions and the poor treatment that low-wage workers suffer.
Ethnography
Ethnography is the extended observation of the social perspective and cultural values of an entire social setting. Researchers seek to immerse themselves in the life of a bounded group, by living and working among them. Often ethnography involves participant observation, but the focus is the systematic observation of an entire community.
The heart of an ethnographic study focuses on how subjects view their own social standing and how they understand themselves in relation to a community. An ethnographic study might observe, for example, a small Newfoundland fishing town, an Inuit community, a village in Thailand, a Buddhist monastery, a private boarding school, or Disney World. These places all have borders. People live, work, study, or vacation within those borders. People are there for a certain reason and therefore behave in certain ways and respect certain cultural norms. An ethnographer would commit to spending a determined amount of time studying every aspect of the chosen place, taking in as much as possible, and keeping careful notes on his or her observations.
A sociologist studying a tribe in the Amazon might learn the language, watch the way villagers go about their daily lives, ask individuals about the meaning of different aspects of activity, study the group’s cosmology and then write a paper about it. To observe a spiritual retreat centre, an ethnographer might sign up for a retreat and attend as a guest for an extended stay, observe and record how people experience spirituality in this setting, and collate the material into results.
The Feminist Perspective: Institutional Ethnography
Dorothy Smith elaborated on traditional ethnography to develop what she calls institutional ethnography (2005). In modern society the practices of everyday life in any particular local setting are often organized at a level that goes beyond what an ethnographer might observe directly. Everyday life is structured by “extralocal,” institutional forms; that is, by the practices of institutions that act upon people from a distance. It might be possible to conduct ethnographic research on the experience of domestic abuse by living in a women’s shelter and directly observing and interviewing victims to see how they form an understanding of their situation. However, to the degree that the women are seeking redress through the criminal justice system a crucial element of the situation would be missing. In order to activate a response from the police or the courts, a set of standard legal procedures must be followed, a “case file” must be opened, legally actionable evidence must be established, forms filled out, etc. All of this allows criminal justice agencies to organize and coordinate the response.
The urgent and immediate experience of the domestic abuse victims needs to be translated into a format that enables distant authorities to take action. Often this is a frustrating and mysterious process in which the immediate needs of individuals are neglected so that needs of institutional processes are met. Therefore to research the situation of domestic abuse victims, an ethnography needs to somehow operate at two levels: the close examination of the local experience of particular women and the simultaneous examination of the extralocal, institutional world through which their world is organized. In order to accomplish this, institutional ethnography focuses on the study of the way everyday life is coordinated through “textually mediated” practices: the use of written documents, standardized bureaucratic categories, and formalized relationships (Smith 1990).
Institutional paperwork translates the specific details of locally lived experience into a standardized format that enables institutions to apply the institution’s understandings, regulations, and operations in different local contexts. The study of these textual practices reveal otherwise inaccessible processes that formal organizations depend on: their formality, their organized character, and their ongoing methods of coordination, etc. An institutional ethnography often begins by following the paper trail that emerges when people interact with institutions: how does a person formulate a narrative about what has happened to him or her in a way that the institution will recognize? How is it translated into the abstract categories on a form or screen that enable an institutional response to be initiated? What is preserved in the translation to paperwork and what is lost? Where do the forms go next? What series of “processing interchanges” take place between different departments or agencies through the circulation of paperwork? How is the paperwork modified and made actionable through this process (e.g., an incident report, warrant request, motion for continuance)?
Smith’s insight is that the shift from the locally lived experience of individuals to the extralocal world of institutions is nothing short of a radical metaphysical shift in worldview. In institutional worlds, meanings are detached from directly lived processes and reconstituted in an organizational time, space, and consciousness that is fundamentally different from their original reference point. For example, the crisis that has led to a loss of employment becomes a set of anonymous criteria that determines one’s eligibility for Employment Insurance.
The unique life of a disabled child becomes a checklist that determines the content of an “individual education program” in the school system, which in turn determines whether funding will be provided for special aid assistants or therapeutic programs. Institutions put together a picture of what has occurred that is not at all the same as what was lived. The ubiquitous but obscure mechanism by which this is accomplished is textually mediated communication . The goal of institutional ethnography therefore is to making “documents or texts visible as constituents of social relations” (Smith 1990). Institutional ethnography is very useful as a critical research strategy. It is an analysis that gives grassroots organizations, or those excluded from the circles of institutional power, a detailed knowledge of how the administrative apparatuses actually work. This type of research enables more effective actions and strategies for change to be pursued.
The Case Study
Sometimes a researcher wants to study one specific person or event. A case study is an in-depth analysis of a single event, situation, or individual. To conduct a case study, a researcher examines existing sources like documents and archival records, conducts interviews, engages in direct observation, and even participant observation, if possible. Researchers might use this method to study a single case of, for example, a foster child, drug lord, cancer patient, criminal, or rape victim. However, a major criticism of the case study as a method is that a developed study of a single case, while offering depth on a topic, does not provide enough evidence to form a generalized conclusion. In other words, it is difficult to make universal claims based on just one person, since one person does not verify a pattern. This is why most sociologists do not use case studies as a primary research method.
However, case studies are useful when the single case is unique. In these instances, a single case study can add tremendous knowledge to a certain discipline. For example, a feral child, also called “wild child,” is one who grows up isolated from human beings. Feral children grow up without social contact and language, elements crucial to a “civilized” child’s development. These children mimic the behaviours and movements of animals, and often invent their own language. There are only about 100 cases of “feral children” in the world. As you may imagine, a feral child is a subject of great interest to researchers. Feral children provide unique information about child development because they have grown up outside of the parameters of “normal” child development. And since there are very few feral children, the case study is the most appropriate method for researchers to use in studying the subject. At age three, a Ukrainian girl named Oxana Malaya suffered severe parental neglect. She lived in a shed with dogs, eating raw meat and scraps. Five years later, a neighbour called authorities and reported seeing a girl who ran on all fours, barking. Officials brought Oxana into society, where she was cared for and taught some human behaviours, but she never became fully socialized. She has been designated as unable to support herself and now lives in a mental institution (Grice 2006). Case studies like this offer a way for sociologists to collect data that may not be collectable by any other method.
Secondary Data or Textual Analysis
While sociologists often engage in original research studies, they also contribute knowledge to the discipline through secondary data or textual analysis . Secondary data do not result from firsthand research collected from primary sources, but are drawn from the already-completed work of other researchers. Sociologists might study texts written by historians, economists, teachers, or early sociologists. They might search through periodicals, newspapers, or magazines from any period in history. Using available information not only saves time and money, but it can add depth to a study. Sociologists often interpret findings in a new way, a way that was not part of an author’s original purpose or intention. To study how women were encouraged to act and behave in the 1960s, for example, a researcher might watch movies, televisions shows, and situation comedies from that period. Or to research changes in behaviour and attitudes due to the emergence of television in the late 1950s and early 1960s, a sociologist would rely on new interpretations of secondary data. Decades from now, researchers will most likely conduct similar studies on the advent of mobile phones, the Internet, or Facebook.
One methodology that sociologists employ with secondary data is content analysis. Content analysis is a quantitative approach to textual research that selects an item of textual content (i.e., a variable) that can be reliably and consistently observed and coded, and surveys the prevalence of that item in a sample of textual output. For example, Gilens (1996) wanted to find out why survey research shows that the American public substantially exaggerates the percentage of African Americans among the poor. He examined whether media representations influence public perceptions and did a content analysis of photographs of poor people in American news magazines. He coded and then systematically recorded incidences of three variables: (1) Race: white, black, indeterminate; (2) Employed: working, not working; and (3) Age. Gilens discovered that not only were African Americans markedly overrepresented in news magazine photographs of poverty, but that the photos also tended to underrepresent “sympathetic” subgroups of the poor—the elderly and working poor—while overrepresenting less sympathetic groups—unemployed, working age adults. Gilens concluded that by providing a distorted representation of poverty, U.S. news magazines “reinforce negative stereotypes of blacks as mired in poverty and contribute to the belief that poverty is primarily a ‘black problem’” (1996).
Social scientists also learn by analyzing the research of a variety of agencies. Governmental departments and global groups, like Statistics Canada or the World Health Organization, publish studies with findings that are useful to sociologists. A public statistic that measures inequality of incomes might be useful for studying who benefited and who lost as a result of the 2008 recession; a demographic profile of different immigrant groups might be compared with data on unemployment to examine the reasons why immigration settlement programs are more effective for some communities than for others. One of the advantages of secondary data is that it is nonreactive (or unobtrusive) research, meaning that it does not include direct contact with subjects and will not alter or influence people’s behaviours. Unlike studies requiring direct contact with people, using previously published data does not require entering a population and the investment and risks inherent in that research process. Using available data does have its challenges. Public records are not always easy to access. A researcher needs to do some legwork to track them down and gain access to records. In some cases there is no way to verify the accuracy of existing data. It is easy, for example, to count how many drunk drivers are pulled over by the police. But how many are not? While it’s possible to discover the percentage of teenage students who drop out of high school, it might be more challenging to determine the number who return to school or get their GED later.
Another problem arises when data are unavailable in the exact form needed or do not include the precise angle the researcher seeks. For example, the salaries paid to professors at universities is often published. But the separate figures do not necessarily reveal how long it took each professor to reach the salary range, what their educational backgrounds are, or how long they have been teaching. In his research, sociologist Richard Sennett uses secondary data to shed light on current trends. In The Craftsman (2008), he studied the human desire to perform quality work, from carpentry to computer programming. He studied the line between craftsmanship and skilled manual labour. He also studied changes in attitudes toward craftsmanship that occurred not only during and after the Industrial Revolution, but also in ancient times. Obviously, he could not have firsthand knowledge of periods of ancient history; he had to rely on secondary data for part of his study. When conducting secondary data or textual analysis, it is important to consider the date of publication of an existing source and to take into account attitudes and common cultural ideals that may have influenced the research. For example, Robert S. Lynd and Helen Merrell Lynd gathered research for their book Middletown: A Study in Modern American Culture in the 1920s. Attitudes and cultural norms were vastly different then than they are now. Beliefs about gender roles, race, education, and work have changed significantly since then. At the time, the study’s purpose was to reveal the truth about small American communities. Today, it is an illustration of 1920s attitudes and values.
Sociologists conduct studies to shed light on human behaviours. Knowledge is a powerful tool that can be used toward positive change. And while a sociologist’s goal is often simply to uncover knowledge rather than to spur action, many people use sociological studies to help improve people’s lives. In that sense, conducting a sociological study comes with a tremendous amount of responsibility. Like any researchers, sociologists must consider their ethical obligation to avoid harming subjects or groups while conducting their research. The Canadian Sociological Association, or CSA, is the major professional organization of sociologists in Canada. The CSA is a great resource for students of sociology as well.
The CSA maintains a code of ethics —formal guidelines for conducting sociological research—consisting of principles and ethical standards to be used in the discipline. It also describes procedures for filing, investigating, and resolving complaints of unethical conduct. These are in line with the Tri-Council Policy Statement on Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (2010) , which applies to any research with human subjects funded by one of the three federal research agencies – the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).
Practising sociologists and sociology students have a lot to consider. Some of the guidelines state that researchers must try to be skillful and fair-minded in their work, especially as it relates to their human subjects. Researchers must obtain participants’ informed consent, and inform subjects of the responsibilities and risks of research before they agree to participate. During a study, sociologists must ensure the safety of participants and immediately stop work if a subject becomes potentially endangered on any level. Researchers are required to protect the privacy of research participants whenever possible. Even if pressured by authorities, such as police or courts, researchers are not ethically allowed to release confidential information. Researchers must make results available to other sociologists, must make public all sources of financial support, and must not accept funding from any organization that might cause a conflict of interest or seek to influence the research results for its own purposes. The CSA’s ethical considerations shape not only the study but also the publication of results.
Pioneer German sociologist Max Weber (1864–1920) identified another crucial ethical concern. Weber understood that personal values could distort the framework for disclosing study results. While he accepted that some aspects of research design might be influenced by personal values, he declared it was entirely inappropriate to allow personal values to shape the interpretation of the responses. Sociologists, he stated, must establish value neutrality , a practice of remaining impartial, without bias or judgment, during the course of a study and in publishing results (1949). Sociologists are obligated to disclose research findings without omitting or distorting significant data. Value neutrality does not mean having no opinions. It means striving to overcome personal biases, particularly subconscious biases, when analyzing data. It means avoiding skewing data in order to match a predetermined outcome that aligns with a particular agenda, such as a political or moral point of view. Investigators are ethically obligated to report results, even when they contradict personal views, predicted outcomes, or widely accepted beliefs. Is value neutrality possible?
Many sociologists believe it is impossible to set aside personal values and retain complete objectivity. Individuals inevitably see the world from a partial perspective. Their interests are central to the types of topics they choose, the types of questions they ask, the way they frame their research and the research methodologies they select to pursue it. Moreover, facts, however objective, do not exist in a void. As we noted in Chapter 1, Jürgen Habermas (1972) argues that sociological research has built-in interests quite apart from the personal biases of individual researchers. Positivist sociology has an interest in pursuing types of knowledge that are useful for controlling and administering social life. Interpretive sociology has an interest in pursuing types of knowledge that promote greater mutual understanding and the possibility of consensus among members of society. Critical sociology has an interest in types of knowledge that enable emancipation from power relations and forms of domination in society. In Habermas’ view, sociological knowledge is not disinterested knowledge. This does not discredit the results of sociological research but allows readers to take into account the perspective of the research when judging the validity and applicability of its outcomes.
case study in-depth analysis of a single event, situation, or individual
code of ethics a set of guidelines that the Canadian Sociological Association has established to foster ethical research and professionally responsible scholarship in sociology
content analysis a quantitative approach to textual research that selects an item of textual content that can be reliably and consistently observed and coded, and surveys the prevalence of that item in a sample of textual output
control group an experimental group that is not exposed to the independent variable
correlation when a change in one variable coincides with a change in another variable, but does not necessarily indicate causation
d ependent variable variable changed by another variable
empirical evidence evidence corroborated by direct experience and/or observation
ethnography observing a complete social setting and all that it entails
experiment the testing of a hypothesis under controlled conditions
field research gathering data from a natural environment without doing a lab experiment or a survey
Hawthorne effect when study subjects behave in a certain manner due to their awareness of being observed by a researcher
hypothesis an educated guess with predicted outcomes about the relationship between two or more variables hypothetico-deductive methodologies methodologies based on deducing a prediction from a hypothesis and testing the validity of the hypothesis by whether it correctly predicts observations
independent variable variable that causes change in a dependent variable
inductive approach methodologies that derive a general statement from a series of empirical observations
institutional ethnography the study of the way everyday life is coordinated through institutional, textually mediated practices
interpretive approach a sociological research approach that seeks in-depth understanding of a topic or subject through observation or interaction
interview a one-on-one conversation between a researcher and a subject
literature review a scholarly research step that entails identifying and studying all existing studies on a topic to create a basis for new research
nonreactive unobtrusive research that does not include direct contact with subjects and will not alter or influence people’s behaviours
operational definitions specific explanations of abstract concepts that a researcher plans to study
participant observation immersion by a researcher in a group or social setting in order to make observations from an “insider” perspective
population a defined group serving as the subject of a study
positivist approach a research approach based on the natural science model of knowledge utilizing a hypothetico-deductive formulation of the research question and quantitative data
primary data data collected directly from firsthand experience
qualitative data information based on interpretations of meaning
quantitative data information from research collected in numerical form that can be counted
random sample a study’s participants being randomly selected to serve as a representation of a larger population reliability a measure of a study’s consistency that considers how likely results are to be replicated if a study is reproduced research design a detailed, systematic method for conducting research and obtaining data
sample small, manageable number of subjects that represent the population
scientific method a systematic research method that involves asking a question, researching existing sources, forming a hypothesis, designing and conducting a study, and drawing conclusions
secondary data analysis using data collected by others but applying new interpretations
surveys data collections from subjects who respond to a series of questions about behaviours and opinions, often in the form of a questionnaire
textually mediated communication institutional forms of communication that rely on written documents, texts, and paperwork
validity the degree to which a sociological measure accurately reflects the topic of study
value neutrality a practice of remaining impartial, without bias or judgment during the course of a study and in publishing results
variable a characteristic or measure of a social phenomenon that can take different values
Section Summary
2.1. Approaches to Sociological Research Using the scientific method, a researcher conducts a study in five phases: asking a question, researching existing sources, formulating a hypothesis, conducting a study, and drawing conclusions. The scientific method is useful in that it provides a clear method of organizing a study. Some sociologists conduct scientific research through a positivist framework utilizing a hypothetico-deductive formulation of the research question. Other sociologists conduct scientific research by employing an interpretive framework that is often inductive in nature. Scientific sociological studies often observe relationships between variables. Researchers study how one variable changes another. Prior to conducting a study, researchers are careful to apply operational definitions to their terms and to establish dependent and independent variables.
2.2. Research Methods Sociological research is a fairly complex process. As you can see, a lot goes into even a simple research design. There are many steps and much to consider when collecting data on human behaviour, as well as in interpreting and analyzing data in order to form conclusive results. Sociologists use scientific methods for good reason. The scientific method provides a system of organization that helps researchers plan and conduct the study while ensuring that data and results are reliable, valid, and objective. The many methods available to researchers—including experiments, surveys, field studies, and secondary data analysis—all come with advantages and disadvantages. The strength of a study can depend on the choice and implementation of the appropriate method of gathering research. Depending on the topic, a study might use a single method or a combination of methods. It is important to plan a research design before undertaking a study. The information gathered may in itself be surprising, and the study design should provide a solid framework in which to analyze predicted and unpredicted data.
Table 2.2. Main Sociological Research Methods. Sociological research methods have advantages and disadvantages.
Method | Implementation | Advantages | Challenges |
---|---|---|---|
Deliberate manipulation of social setting to compare experimental and control groups. Tests cause and effect relationships | |||
Makes good use of previous sociological information |
2.3. Ethical Concerns Sociologists and sociology students must take ethical responsibility for any study they conduct. They must first and foremost guarantee the safety of their participants. Whenever possible, they must ensure that participants have been fully informed before consenting to be part of a study. The CSA (Canadian Sociological Association) maintains ethical guidelines that sociologists must take into account as they conduct research. The guidelines address conducting studies, properly using existing sources, accepting funding, and publishing results. Sociologists must try to maintain value neutrality. They must gather and analyze data objectively, setting aside their personal preferences, beliefs, and opinions. They must report findings accurately, even if they contradict personal convictions.
Section Quiz
2.1. Approaches to Sociological Research 1. A measurement is considered ______ if it actually measures what it is intended to measure, according to the topic of the study.
- sociological
- quantitative
2. Sociological studies test relationships in which change in one ______ causes change in another.
- test subject
- operational definition
3. In a study, a group of 10-year-old boys are fed doughnuts every morning for a week and then weighed to see how much weight they gained. Which factor is the dependent variable?
- the doughnuts
- the duration of a week
- the weight gained
4. Which statement provides the best operational definition of “childhood obesity”?
- children who eat unhealthy foods and spend too much time watching television and playing video games
- a distressing trend that can lead to health issues including type 2 diabetes and heart disease
- body weight at least 20 percent higher than a healthy weight for a child of that height
- the tendency of children today to weigh more than children of earlier generations
2.2. Research Methods 5. Which materials are considered secondary data?
- photos and letters given to you by another person
- books and articles written by other authors about their studies
- information that you have gathered and now have included in your results
- responses from participants whom you both surveyed and interviewed
6. What method did Andrew Ivsins use to study crack users in Victoria?
- field research
- content analysis
7. Why is choosing a random sample an effective way to select participants?
- Participants do not know they are part of a study
- The researcher has no control over who is in the study
- It is larger than an ordinary sample
- Everyone has the same chance of being part of the study
8. What research method did John S. Lynd and Helen Merrell Lynd mainly use in their Middletown study?
- secondary data
- participant observation
9. Which research approach is best suited to the positivist approach?
- questionnaire
- ethnography
- secondary data analysis
10. The main difference between ethnography and other types of participant observation is:
- ethnography isn’t based on hypothesis testing
- ethnography subjects are unaware they’re being studied
- ethnographic studies always involve minority ethnic groups
- there is no difference
11. Which best describes the results of a case study?
- it produces more reliable results than other methods because of its depth
- its results are not generally applicable
- it relies solely on secondary data analysis
- all of the above
12. Using secondary data is considered an unobtrusive or ________ research method.
- nonreactive
- nonparticipatory
- nonrestrictive
- nonconfrontive
2.3. Ethical Concerns 13. Which statement illustrates value neutrality?
- Obesity in children is obviously a result of parental neglect and, therefore, schools should take a greater role to prevent it.
- In 2003, states like Arkansas adopted laws requiring elementary schools to remove soft drink vending machines from schools.
- Merely restricting children’s access to junk food at school is not enough to prevent obesity.
- Physical activity and healthy eating are a fundamental part of a child’s education.
14. Which person or organization defined the concept of value neutrality?
- Institutional Review Board (IRB)
- Peter Rossi
- Canadian Sociological Association (CSA)
15. To study the effects of fast food on lifestyle, health, and culture, from which group would a researcher ethically be unable to accept funding?
- a fast-food restaurant
- a nonprofit health organization
- a private hospital
- a governmental agency like Health and Social Services
Short Answer
- Write down the first three steps of the scientific method. Think of a broad topic that you are interested in and which would make a good sociological study—for example, ethnic diversity in a college, homecoming rituals, athletic scholarships, or teen driving. Now, take that topic through the first steps of the process. For each step, write a few sentences or a paragraph: 1) Ask a question about the topic. 2) Do some research and write down the titles of some articles or books you’d want to read about the topic. 3) Formulate a hypothesis.
2.2.Research Methods
- What type of data do surveys gather? For what topics would surveys be the best research method? What drawbacks might you expect to encounter when using a survey? To explore further, ask a research question and write a hypothesis. Then create a survey of about six questions relevant to the topic. Provide a rationale for each question. Now define your population and create a plan for recruiting a random sample and administering the survey.
- Imagine you are about to do field research in a specific place for a set time. Instead of thinking about the topic of study itself, consider how you, as the researcher, will have to prepare for the study. What personal, social, and physical sacrifices will you have to make? How will you manage your personal effects? What organizational equipment and systems will you need to collect the data?
- Create a brief research design about a topic in which you are passionately interested. Now write a letter to a philanthropic or grant organization requesting funding for your study. How can you describe the project in a convincing yet realistic and objective way? Explain how the results of your study will be a relevant contribution to the body of sociological work already in existence.
- Why do you think the CSA crafted such a detailed set of ethical principles? What type of study could put human participants at risk? Think of some examples of studies that might be harmful. Do you think that, in the name of sociology, some researchers might be tempted to cross boundaries that threaten human rights? Why?
- Would you willingly participate in a sociological study that could potentially put your health and safety at risk, but had the potential to help thousands or even hundreds of thousands of people? For example, would you participate in a study of a new drug that could cure diabetes or cancer, even if it meant great inconvenience and physical discomfort for you or possible permanent damage?
Further Research
2.1. Approaches to Sociological Research For a historical perspective on the scientific method in sociology, read “The Elements of Scientific Method in Sociology” by F. Stuart Chapin (1914) in the American Journal of Sociology : http://openstaxcollege.org/l/Method-in-Sociology
2.2. Research Methods For information on current real-world sociology experiments, visit: http://openstaxcollege.org/l/Sociology-Experiments
2.3. Ethical Concerns Founded in 1966, the CSA is a nonprofit organization located in Montreal, Quebec, with a membership of 900 researchers, faculty members, students, and practitioners of sociology. Its mission is to promote “research, publication and teaching in Sociology in Canada.” Learn more about this organization at http://www.csa-scs.ca/ .
2.1. Approaches to Sociological Research Merton, Robert. 1968 [1949]. Social Theory and Social Structure . New York: Free Press.
2.2. Research Methods Forget, Evelyn. 2011. “The Town with no Poverty: Using Health Administration Data to Revisit Outcomes of a Canadian Guaranteed Annual Income Field Experiement.” Canadian Public Policy . 37(3): 282-305.
Franke, Richard and James Kaul. 1978. “The Hawthorne Experiments: First Statistical Interpretation.” American Sociological Review 43(5):632–643.
Gilens, Martin. 1996. “Race and Poverty in America: Public Misperceptions and the American News Media.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 60(4):515–541. Grice, Elizabeth. 2006. “Cry of an Enfant Sauvage.” The Telegraph . Retrieved July 20, 2011 ( http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/3653890/Cry-of-an-enfant-sauvage.html ).
Haney, C., Banks, W. C., and Zimbardo, P. G. 1973. “Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison.” International Journal of Criminology and Penology 1:69–97.
Ivsins, A.K. 2010. “’Got a pipe?’ The social dimensions and functions of crack pipe sharing among crack users in Victoria, BC.” MA thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Victoria. Retrieved February 14, 2014 ( http://dspace.library.uvic.ca:8080/bitstream/handle/1828/3044/Full%20thesis%20Ivsins_CPS.2010_FINAL.pdf?sequence=1 )
Lowrey, Annie. 2013. “Switzerland’s Proposal to Pay People for Being Alive.” The New York Times Magazine. Retrieved February 17, 2014 ( http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/17/magazine/switzerlands-proposal-to-pay-people-for-being-alive.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2 ).
Lynd, Robert S. and Helen Merrell Lynd. 1959. Middletown: A Study in Modern American Culture . San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.
Lynd, Staughton. 2005. “Making Middleton.” Indiana Magazine of History 101(3):226–238.
Marshall, B.D.L., M.J. Milloy, E. Wood, J.S.G. Montaner, and T. Kerr. 2011. “Reduction in overdose mortality after the opening of North America’s first medically supervised safer injecting facility: A retrospective population-based study.” Lancet 377(9775):1429–1437.
Rothman, Rodney. 2000. “My Fake Job.” The New Yorker , November 27, 120.
Sennett, Richard. 2008. The Craftsman . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Retrieved July 18, 2011 ( http://www.richardsennett.com/site/SENN/Templates/General.aspx?pageid=40 ).
Smith, Dorothy. 1990. “Textually Mediated Social Organization” Pp. 209–234 in Texts, Facts and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. London: Routledge.
Smith, Dorothy. 2005. Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Toronto: Altamira Press.
Sonnenfeld, Jeffery A. 1985. “Shedding Light on the Hawthorne Studies.” Journal of Occupational Behavior 6:125.
Wood, E., M.W. Tyndall, J.S. Montaner, and T. Kerr. 2006. “Summary of findings from the evaluation of a pilot medically supervised safer injecting facility.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 175(11):1399–1404.
2.3. Ethical Concerns Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. 2010. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans . Retrieved February 15, 2014 ( http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf ).
Canadian Sociological Association. 2012. Statement of Professional Ethics . Retrieved February 15, 2014 ( http://www.csa-scs.ca/files/www/csa/documents/codeofethics/2012Ethics.pdf ).
Habermas, Jürgen. 1972. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press
Weber, Max. 1949. Methodology of the Social Sciences . Translated by H. Shils and E. Finch. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Solutions to Section Quiz
1. C | 2. C | 3. D | 4. C | 5. B | 6. C | 7. D | 8. C | 9. A | 10. A | 11. B | 12. A | 13. B | 14. D | 15. A
Image Attributions
Figure 2.3. Didn’t they abolish the mandatory census? Then what’s this? by Khosrow Ebrahimpour ( https://www.flickr.com/photos/xosrow/5685345306/in/photolist-9EoT5W-ow4tdu-oeGG4m-oeMEcK-oy2jM2-ovJC8w-oePSRQ-9J2V24-of1Hnu-of243u-of2K2B-of2FHn-owiBSA-owtQN3-of1Ktd-oitLSC-oeVJte-oep8KX-ovEz8w-oeohhF-oew5Xb-oewdWN-owavju-oeMEnV-oweLcN-ovEPGG-ovAQUX-oeo2eL-oeo3Fd-oeoqxh-oxCKnv-ovEzA5-oewFHa-ovHRSz-ow8QtY-oeQY6Y-oeZReR-oeQmHw-oeKXid-oeQLKa-oy6fNT-ow4sVT-oeQMQq-oeQPPr-oeQYbL-ow8hS1-ow4n8v-owiPKS-oeQF41-oeiH5z ) used under CC BY 2.0 ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ )
Figure 2.4. Dauphin Canadian Northern Railway Station by Bobak Ha’Eri ( http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2009-0520-TrainStation-Dauphin.jpg ) used under CC BY 3.0 license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en )
Figure 2.5. Punk Band by Patrick ( https://www.flickr.com/photos/lordkhan/181561343/in/photostream/ ) used under CC BY 2.0 ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ )
Figure 2.6. Crack Cocaine Smokers in Vancouver Alleyway ( http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Crack_Cocaine_Smokers_in_Vancouver_Alleyway.jpg ) is in the public domain ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain )
Figure 2.8. Muncie, Indiana High School: 1917 by Don O’Brien ( https://www.flickr.com/photos/dok1/3694125269/ ) used under CC BY 2.0 license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ )
Introduction to Sociology - 1st Canadian Edition Copyright © 2014 by William Little and Ron McGivern is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.
Share This Book
Module 2: Sociological Research
Sociological research, learning outcomes.
- Describe how sociologists utilize the empirical and the interpretive framework to critically examine social situations
Because sociology examines so cial relationships and behavior (things everyone is familiar with in some way), sometimes the concepts you cover in this course will seem like common sense. Yet one of the aspects of sociology that makes it an exciting discipline is that is strives to utilize the scientific method to find ways to check common sense and to critically examine perceived relationships and meanings.
Empirical Framework
We often have opinions about social situations, but these may be biased by our expectations or based on limited data. Instead, scientific research is based on empirical evidence , which is evidence that comes from direct experience, scientifically gathered data, or experimentation. Conducting research and testing a hypothesis in a controlled setting through deductive methods is the typical process for obtaining empirical evidence.
For example, many people believe that crime rates go up when there’s a full moon, but research doesn’t support this opinion. Psychologists Rotton and Kelly (1985) conducted a meta-analysis of research on the full moon’s effects on behavior. Meta-analysis is a technique in which the results of virtually all previous studies on a specific subject are evaluated together. Rotton and Kelly’s meta-analysis included thirty-seven prior studies on the effects of the full moon on crime rates, and the overall findings were that full moons are entirely unrelated to crime, suicide, psychiatric problems, and crisis center calls (cited in Arkowitz and Lilienfeld 2009). We may each know of an instance in which a crime happened during a full moon, but it was likely just a coincidence.
Figure 1. Many believe that crime rates go up during the full moon, but scientific research does not support this conclusion. (Photo courtesy of Jubula 2/flickr)
Interpretive Framework
While empirical evidence is very useful, sociologists have found that some social phenomena cannot be easily studied using the traditional scientific method. Sometimes it is necessary to utilize what is called an interpretive framework, which focuses on gathering information instead of designing a study. While systematic, this approach doesn’t follow the hypothesis-testing model that seeks to find generalizable results. Instead, an interpretive framework seeks to understand social worlds from the point of view of participants, which leads to in-depth knowledge.
Interpretive research is generally more descriptive or narrative in its findings. Rather than formulating a hypothesis and applying a method for testing it, an interpretive researcher will develop approaches for exploring the topic at hand that may involve a significant amount of direct observation or interaction with subjects. This type of researcher also learns as he or she proceeds and sometimes adjusts the research methods or processes midway to optimize findings as they evolve.
Critical Sociology
Critical sociology focuses on deconstruction of existing sociological research and theory. Informed by the work of Karl Marx, scholars known collectively as the Frankfurt School proposed that social science, as much as any academic pursuit, is embedded in the system of power constituted by the set of class, caste, race, gender, and other relationships that exist in the society. Consequently, it cannot be treated as purely objective. Critical sociologists view theories, methods, and the conclusions as serving one of two purposes: they can either legitimate and rationalize systems of social power and oppression or liberate humans from inequality and restriction on human freedom. Deconstruction can involve data collection, but the analysis of this data is not empirical or positivist.
Evictions in the U.S.: An Empirical and interpretive approach
Princeton sociologist Matthew Desmond combined both empirical research methods with the interpretive framework to shed light on a topic that had not been systematically researched—evictions. In his Pulitzer Prize winning book Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City , Desmond provided a sweeping narrative of eight families in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, who were “swept up in the process of eviction” (2016).
Desmond also created the first nationwide database of evictions by examining 83 million court records dating back to 2000. Using secondary sources, Desmond compiled information that has resulted in a national conversation about poverty, inequality, and public policy.
Watch here as Desmond discusses ethnography and how it relates to studying eviction, and how he collected hundreds of thousands of eviction notices, millions of 911 calls, and other types of data to create a fuller picture of eviction and poverty in the United States:
Have you ever wondered if home schooling affects a person’s later success in college or how many people wait until they are in their forties to get married? Do you wonder if texting is changing teenagers’ abilities to spell correctly or to communicate clearly? How do social movements like Occupy Wall Street develop? How about the development of social phenomena like the massive public “fan” communities that follow Star Trek and the Harry Potter series?
Sociological research attempts to answer a vast array of questions, such as these and more, about our social world. Sociologists use empirical data and/or an interpretative framework to increase understanding of societies and social interactions, but in all cases research begins with the pursuit of an answer to a question. Paradoxically, the most interesting research findings often lead to more research!
- Introduction to Sociological Research. Authored by : OpenStax CNX. Located at : https://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]:3jKfjHaQ@10/Introduction-to-Sociological-Research . License : CC BY: Attribution . License Terms : Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]
- Critical Sociology . Provided by : OpenStax. Located at : https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/2-1-approaches-to-sociological-research . Project : Introduction to Sociology 3e. License : CC BY: Attribution . License Terms : Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/1-introduction
- Urban Sociologist Matthew Desmond, 2015 MacArthur Fellow. Provided by : macfound. Located at : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wajNrp43q8M . License : Other . License Terms : Standard YouTube License
Sociology Research Guide: Identifying & Finding Empirical Articles
- Evaluating Your Sources
- Types of Publications
- Identifying & Finding Empirical Articles
- Known Item Searching
- EndNote Web
How to Recognize Empirical Journal Articles
Definition of an empirical study: An empirical research article reports the results of a study that uses data derived from actual observation or experimentation. Empirical research articles are examples of primary research.
Parts of a standard empirical research article: (articles will not necessary use the exact terms listed below.)
- Abstract ... A paragraph length description of what the study includes.
- Introduction ...Includes a statement of the hypotheses for the research and a review of other research on the topic.
- Method ...A description of how the research was conducted, such as: ◊ Who are participants ◊ Design of the study ◊ What the participants did ◊ What measures were used
- Results ...Describes the outcomes of the measures of the study.
- Discussion...C ontains the interpretations and implications of the study.
- References...C ontains citation information on the material cited in the report. (also called bibliography or works cited)
Characteristics of an Empirical Article:
- Empirical articles will include charts, graphs, or statistical analysis.
- Empirical research articles are usually substantial, maybe from 8-30 pages long.
- There is always a bibliography found at the end of the article.
Type of publications that publish empirical studies:
- Empirical research articles are published in scholarly or academic journals These journals are also called “peer-reviewed,” or “refereed” publications.
- Examples of such publications include: ◊ American Journal of Sociology ◊ Sociological Quarterly ◊ Sociological Methods and Research
Databases that contain empirical research: (selected list only)
- Academic Search Premier add these words to your search terms: method* or research or research design or survey* or data or result*
- PsycINFO limit your searches by Form/Content Type to Empirical Study
- ERIC limit to Pub. Type to Reports - Research/Technical Change one dropdown box to Record. This finds REPORTS--RESEARCH.
- Sociological Abstracts 1963 - present.
- Sports Discus Change search limit to Level = Advanced for original scientific research
Empirical Articles - Sample Research Tips
Empirical articles detail original research/studies that have been done.
Some of the major components of empirical articles include the following: Abstract , Introduction , Method , Results , Discussion , References
Locating Empirical Articles in APA PsycINFO
Use the "Methodology" limiter to select: EMPIRICAL STUDY
Locating Empirical Articles in ERIC
Use the "Publication Type" limiter to select: Reports - Research
Locating Empirical Articles in Other Databases
Use terms such as: study , research , empirical , methods , methodology , research design , survey , data , results
Please remember to use OR between your combination of terms. For example, you may enter the following in one search box:
study OR research OR empirical
research OR methods OR data OR results
- << Previous: Articles
- Next: Known Item Searching >>
- Last Updated: Sep 10, 2024 3:18 PM
- URL: https://libraryguides.fullerton.edu/sociology
This site is maintained by Pollak Library .
To report problems or comments with this site, please contact [email protected] . © California State University, Fullerton. All Rights Reserved.
Web Accessibility
CSUF is committed to ensuring equal accessibility to our users. Let us know about any accessibility problems you encounter using this website. We'll do our best to improve things and get you the information you need.
- Adobe Reader
- Microsoft Viewers
- Report An ATI Issue
- Accessible @ CSUF
- History & Society
- Science & Tech
- Biographies
- Animals & Nature
- Geography & Travel
- Arts & Culture
- Games & Quizzes
- On This Day
- One Good Fact
- New Articles
- Lifestyles & Social Issues
- Philosophy & Religion
- Politics, Law & Government
- World History
- Health & Medicine
- Browse Biographies
- Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
- Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
- Environment
- Fossils & Geologic Time
- Entertainment & Pop Culture
- Sports & Recreation
- Visual Arts
- Demystified
- Image Galleries
- Infographics
- Top Questions
- Britannica Kids
- Saving Earth
- Space Next 50
- Student Center
- When did science begin?
- Where was science invented?
empirical evidence
Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - PubMed Central - Expert opinion vs. empirical evidence
- LiveScience - Empirical evidence: A definition
- Academia - Empirical Evidence
empirical evidence , information gathered directly or indirectly through observation or experimentation that may be used to confirm or disconfirm a scientific theory or to help justify, or establish as reasonable, a person’s belief in a given proposition. A belief may be said to be justified if there is sufficient evidence to make holding the belief reasonable.
The concept of evidence is the basis of philosophical evidentialism, an epistemological thesis according to which a person is justified in believing a given proposition p if and only if the person’s evidence for p is proper or sufficient. In this context , the Scottish Enlightenment philosopher David Hume (1711–76) famously asserted that the “wise man…proportions his belief to the evidence.” In a similar vein, the American astronomer Carl Sagan popularized the statement, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”
Foundationalists , however, defend the view that certain basic, or foundational, beliefs are either inherently justified or justified by something other than another belief (e.g., a sensation or perception) and that all other beliefs may be justified only if they are directly or indirectly supported by at least one foundational belief (that is, only if they are either supported by at least one foundational belief or supported by other beliefs that are themselves supported by at least one foundational belief). The most influential foundationalist of the modern period was the French philosopher and mathematician René Descartes (1596–1650), who attempted to establish a foundation for justified beliefs regarding an external world in his intuition that, for as long as he is thinking, he exists (“I think, therefore I am”; see cogito, ergo sum ). A traditional argument in favour of foundationalism asserts that no other account of inferential justification—the act of justifying a given belief by inferring it from another belief that itself is justified—is possible. Thus, assume that one belief, Belief 1, is justified by another belief, Belief 2. How is Belief 2 justified? It cannot be justified by Belief 1, because the inference from Belief 2 to Belief 1 would then be circular and invalid. It cannot be justified by a third nonfoundational Belief 3, because the same question would then apply to that belief, leading to an infinite regress. And one cannot simply assume that Belief 2 is not justified, for then Belief 1 would not be justified through the inference from Belief 2. Accordingly, there must be some beliefs whose justification does not depend on other beliefs, and those justified beliefs must function as a foundation for the inferential justification of other beliefs.
Empirical evidence can be quantitative or qualitative. Typically, numerical quantitative evidence can be represented visually by means of diagrams, graphs, or charts, reflecting the use of statistical or mathematical data and the researcher’s neutral noninteractive role. It can be obtained by methods such as experiments, surveys, correlational research (to study the relationship between variables), cross-sectional research (to compare different groups), causal-comparative research (to explore cause-effect relationships), and longitudinal studies (to test a subject during a given time period).
Qualitative evidence, on the other hand, can foster a deeper understanding of behaviour and related factors and is not typically expressed by using numbers. Often subjective and resulting from interaction between the researcher and participants, it can stem from the use of methods such as interviews (based on verbal interaction), observation (informing ethnographic research design), textual analysis (involving the description and interpretation of texts), focus groups (planned group discussions), and case studies (in-depth analyses of individuals or groups).
Empirical evidence is subject to assessments of its validity. Validity can be internal, involving the soundness of an experiment’s design and execution and the accuracy of subsequent data analysis , or external, involving generalizability to other research contexts ( see ecological validity ).
- Skip to main content
- Skip to primary sidebar
- Skip to footer
- QuestionPro
- Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case AskWhy Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
- Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center
Home Market Research
Empirical Research: Definition, Methods, Types and Examples
Content Index
Empirical research: Definition
Empirical research: origin, quantitative research methods, qualitative research methods, steps for conducting empirical research, empirical research methodology cycle, advantages of empirical research, disadvantages of empirical research, why is there a need for empirical research.
Empirical research is defined as any research where conclusions of the study is strictly drawn from concretely empirical evidence, and therefore “verifiable” evidence.
This empirical evidence can be gathered using quantitative market research and qualitative market research methods.
For example: A research is being conducted to find out if listening to happy music in the workplace while working may promote creativity? An experiment is conducted by using a music website survey on a set of audience who are exposed to happy music and another set who are not listening to music at all, and the subjects are then observed. The results derived from such a research will give empirical evidence if it does promote creativity or not.
LEARN ABOUT: Behavioral Research
You must have heard the quote” I will not believe it unless I see it”. This came from the ancient empiricists, a fundamental understanding that powered the emergence of medieval science during the renaissance period and laid the foundation of modern science, as we know it today. The word itself has its roots in greek. It is derived from the greek word empeirikos which means “experienced”.
In today’s world, the word empirical refers to collection of data using evidence that is collected through observation or experience or by using calibrated scientific instruments. All of the above origins have one thing in common which is dependence of observation and experiments to collect data and test them to come up with conclusions.
LEARN ABOUT: Causal Research
Types and methodologies of empirical research
Empirical research can be conducted and analysed using qualitative or quantitative methods.
- Quantitative research : Quantitative research methods are used to gather information through numerical data. It is used to quantify opinions, behaviors or other defined variables . These are predetermined and are in a more structured format. Some of the commonly used methods are survey, longitudinal studies, polls, etc
- Qualitative research: Qualitative research methods are used to gather non numerical data. It is used to find meanings, opinions, or the underlying reasons from its subjects. These methods are unstructured or semi structured. The sample size for such a research is usually small and it is a conversational type of method to provide more insight or in-depth information about the problem Some of the most popular forms of methods are focus groups, experiments, interviews, etc.
Data collected from these will need to be analysed. Empirical evidence can also be analysed either quantitatively and qualitatively. Using this, the researcher can answer empirical questions which have to be clearly defined and answerable with the findings he has got. The type of research design used will vary depending on the field in which it is going to be used. Many of them might choose to do a collective research involving quantitative and qualitative method to better answer questions which cannot be studied in a laboratory setting.
LEARN ABOUT: Qualitative Research Questions and Questionnaires
Quantitative research methods aid in analyzing the empirical evidence gathered. By using these a researcher can find out if his hypothesis is supported or not.
- Survey research: Survey research generally involves a large audience to collect a large amount of data. This is a quantitative method having a predetermined set of closed questions which are pretty easy to answer. Because of the simplicity of such a method, high responses are achieved. It is one of the most commonly used methods for all kinds of research in today’s world.
Previously, surveys were taken face to face only with maybe a recorder. However, with advancement in technology and for ease, new mediums such as emails , or social media have emerged.
For example: Depletion of energy resources is a growing concern and hence there is a need for awareness about renewable energy. According to recent studies, fossil fuels still account for around 80% of energy consumption in the United States. Even though there is a rise in the use of green energy every year, there are certain parameters because of which the general population is still not opting for green energy. In order to understand why, a survey can be conducted to gather opinions of the general population about green energy and the factors that influence their choice of switching to renewable energy. Such a survey can help institutions or governing bodies to promote appropriate awareness and incentive schemes to push the use of greener energy.
Learn more: Renewable Energy Survey Template Descriptive Research vs Correlational Research
- Experimental research: In experimental research , an experiment is set up and a hypothesis is tested by creating a situation in which one of the variable is manipulated. This is also used to check cause and effect. It is tested to see what happens to the independent variable if the other one is removed or altered. The process for such a method is usually proposing a hypothesis, experimenting on it, analyzing the findings and reporting the findings to understand if it supports the theory or not.
For example: A particular product company is trying to find what is the reason for them to not be able to capture the market. So the organisation makes changes in each one of the processes like manufacturing, marketing, sales and operations. Through the experiment they understand that sales training directly impacts the market coverage for their product. If the person is trained well, then the product will have better coverage.
- Correlational research: Correlational research is used to find relation between two set of variables . Regression analysis is generally used to predict outcomes of such a method. It can be positive, negative or neutral correlation.
LEARN ABOUT: Level of Analysis
For example: Higher educated individuals will get higher paying jobs. This means higher education enables the individual to high paying job and less education will lead to lower paying jobs.
- Longitudinal study: Longitudinal study is used to understand the traits or behavior of a subject under observation after repeatedly testing the subject over a period of time. Data collected from such a method can be qualitative or quantitative in nature.
For example: A research to find out benefits of exercise. The target is asked to exercise everyday for a particular period of time and the results show higher endurance, stamina, and muscle growth. This supports the fact that exercise benefits an individual body.
- Cross sectional: Cross sectional study is an observational type of method, in which a set of audience is observed at a given point in time. In this type, the set of people are chosen in a fashion which depicts similarity in all the variables except the one which is being researched. This type does not enable the researcher to establish a cause and effect relationship as it is not observed for a continuous time period. It is majorly used by healthcare sector or the retail industry.
For example: A medical study to find the prevalence of under-nutrition disorders in kids of a given population. This will involve looking at a wide range of parameters like age, ethnicity, location, incomes and social backgrounds. If a significant number of kids coming from poor families show under-nutrition disorders, the researcher can further investigate into it. Usually a cross sectional study is followed by a longitudinal study to find out the exact reason.
- Causal-Comparative research : This method is based on comparison. It is mainly used to find out cause-effect relationship between two variables or even multiple variables.
For example: A researcher measured the productivity of employees in a company which gave breaks to the employees during work and compared that to the employees of the company which did not give breaks at all.
LEARN ABOUT: Action Research
Some research questions need to be analysed qualitatively, as quantitative methods are not applicable there. In many cases, in-depth information is needed or a researcher may need to observe a target audience behavior, hence the results needed are in a descriptive analysis form. Qualitative research results will be descriptive rather than predictive. It enables the researcher to build or support theories for future potential quantitative research. In such a situation qualitative research methods are used to derive a conclusion to support the theory or hypothesis being studied.
LEARN ABOUT: Qualitative Interview
- Case study: Case study method is used to find more information through carefully analyzing existing cases. It is very often used for business research or to gather empirical evidence for investigation purpose. It is a method to investigate a problem within its real life context through existing cases. The researcher has to carefully analyse making sure the parameter and variables in the existing case are the same as to the case that is being investigated. Using the findings from the case study, conclusions can be drawn regarding the topic that is being studied.
For example: A report mentioning the solution provided by a company to its client. The challenges they faced during initiation and deployment, the findings of the case and solutions they offered for the problems. Such case studies are used by most companies as it forms an empirical evidence for the company to promote in order to get more business.
- Observational method: Observational method is a process to observe and gather data from its target. Since it is a qualitative method it is time consuming and very personal. It can be said that observational research method is a part of ethnographic research which is also used to gather empirical evidence. This is usually a qualitative form of research, however in some cases it can be quantitative as well depending on what is being studied.
For example: setting up a research to observe a particular animal in the rain-forests of amazon. Such a research usually take a lot of time as observation has to be done for a set amount of time to study patterns or behavior of the subject. Another example used widely nowadays is to observe people shopping in a mall to figure out buying behavior of consumers.
- One-on-one interview: Such a method is purely qualitative and one of the most widely used. The reason being it enables a researcher get precise meaningful data if the right questions are asked. It is a conversational method where in-depth data can be gathered depending on where the conversation leads.
For example: A one-on-one interview with the finance minister to gather data on financial policies of the country and its implications on the public.
- Focus groups: Focus groups are used when a researcher wants to find answers to why, what and how questions. A small group is generally chosen for such a method and it is not necessary to interact with the group in person. A moderator is generally needed in case the group is being addressed in person. This is widely used by product companies to collect data about their brands and the product.
For example: A mobile phone manufacturer wanting to have a feedback on the dimensions of one of their models which is yet to be launched. Such studies help the company meet the demand of the customer and position their model appropriately in the market.
- Text analysis: Text analysis method is a little new compared to the other types. Such a method is used to analyse social life by going through images or words used by the individual. In today’s world, with social media playing a major part of everyone’s life, such a method enables the research to follow the pattern that relates to his study.
For example: A lot of companies ask for feedback from the customer in detail mentioning how satisfied are they with their customer support team. Such data enables the researcher to take appropriate decisions to make their support team better.
Sometimes a combination of the methods is also needed for some questions that cannot be answered using only one type of method especially when a researcher needs to gain a complete understanding of complex subject matter.
We recently published a blog that talks about examples of qualitative data in education ; why don’t you check it out for more ideas?
Learn More: Data Collection Methods: Types & Examples
Since empirical research is based on observation and capturing experiences, it is important to plan the steps to conduct the experiment and how to analyse it. This will enable the researcher to resolve problems or obstacles which can occur during the experiment.
Step #1: Define the purpose of the research
This is the step where the researcher has to answer questions like what exactly do I want to find out? What is the problem statement? Are there any issues in terms of the availability of knowledge, data, time or resources. Will this research be more beneficial than what it will cost.
Before going ahead, a researcher has to clearly define his purpose for the research and set up a plan to carry out further tasks.
Step #2 : Supporting theories and relevant literature
The researcher needs to find out if there are theories which can be linked to his research problem . He has to figure out if any theory can help him support his findings. All kind of relevant literature will help the researcher to find if there are others who have researched this before, or what are the problems faced during this research. The researcher will also have to set up assumptions and also find out if there is any history regarding his research problem
Step #3: Creation of Hypothesis and measurement
Before beginning the actual research he needs to provide himself a working hypothesis or guess what will be the probable result. Researcher has to set up variables, decide the environment for the research and find out how can he relate between the variables.
Researcher will also need to define the units of measurements, tolerable degree for errors, and find out if the measurement chosen will be acceptable by others.
Step #4: Methodology, research design and data collection
In this step, the researcher has to define a strategy for conducting his research. He has to set up experiments to collect data which will enable him to propose the hypothesis. The researcher will decide whether he will need experimental or non experimental method for conducting the research. The type of research design will vary depending on the field in which the research is being conducted. Last but not the least, the researcher will have to find out parameters that will affect the validity of the research design. Data collection will need to be done by choosing appropriate samples depending on the research question. To carry out the research, he can use one of the many sampling techniques. Once data collection is complete, researcher will have empirical data which needs to be analysed.
LEARN ABOUT: Best Data Collection Tools
Step #5: Data Analysis and result
Data analysis can be done in two ways, qualitatively and quantitatively. Researcher will need to find out what qualitative method or quantitative method will be needed or will he need a combination of both. Depending on the unit of analysis of his data, he will know if his hypothesis is supported or rejected. Analyzing this data is the most important part to support his hypothesis.
Step #6: Conclusion
A report will need to be made with the findings of the research. The researcher can give the theories and literature that support his research. He can make suggestions or recommendations for further research on his topic.
A.D. de Groot, a famous dutch psychologist and a chess expert conducted some of the most notable experiments using chess in the 1940’s. During his study, he came up with a cycle which is consistent and now widely used to conduct empirical research. It consists of 5 phases with each phase being as important as the next one. The empirical cycle captures the process of coming up with hypothesis about how certain subjects work or behave and then testing these hypothesis against empirical data in a systematic and rigorous approach. It can be said that it characterizes the deductive approach to science. Following is the empirical cycle.
- Observation: At this phase an idea is sparked for proposing a hypothesis. During this phase empirical data is gathered using observation. For example: a particular species of flower bloom in a different color only during a specific season.
- Induction: Inductive reasoning is then carried out to form a general conclusion from the data gathered through observation. For example: As stated above it is observed that the species of flower blooms in a different color during a specific season. A researcher may ask a question “does the temperature in the season cause the color change in the flower?” He can assume that is the case, however it is a mere conjecture and hence an experiment needs to be set up to support this hypothesis. So he tags a few set of flowers kept at a different temperature and observes if they still change the color?
- Deduction: This phase helps the researcher to deduce a conclusion out of his experiment. This has to be based on logic and rationality to come up with specific unbiased results.For example: In the experiment, if the tagged flowers in a different temperature environment do not change the color then it can be concluded that temperature plays a role in changing the color of the bloom.
- Testing: This phase involves the researcher to return to empirical methods to put his hypothesis to the test. The researcher now needs to make sense of his data and hence needs to use statistical analysis plans to determine the temperature and bloom color relationship. If the researcher finds out that most flowers bloom a different color when exposed to the certain temperature and the others do not when the temperature is different, he has found support to his hypothesis. Please note this not proof but just a support to his hypothesis.
- Evaluation: This phase is generally forgotten by most but is an important one to keep gaining knowledge. During this phase the researcher puts forth the data he has collected, the support argument and his conclusion. The researcher also states the limitations for the experiment and his hypothesis and suggests tips for others to pick it up and continue a more in-depth research for others in the future. LEARN MORE: Population vs Sample
LEARN MORE: Population vs Sample
There is a reason why empirical research is one of the most widely used method. There are a few advantages associated with it. Following are a few of them.
- It is used to authenticate traditional research through various experiments and observations.
- This research methodology makes the research being conducted more competent and authentic.
- It enables a researcher understand the dynamic changes that can happen and change his strategy accordingly.
- The level of control in such a research is high so the researcher can control multiple variables.
- It plays a vital role in increasing internal validity .
Even though empirical research makes the research more competent and authentic, it does have a few disadvantages. Following are a few of them.
- Such a research needs patience as it can be very time consuming. The researcher has to collect data from multiple sources and the parameters involved are quite a few, which will lead to a time consuming research.
- Most of the time, a researcher will need to conduct research at different locations or in different environments, this can lead to an expensive affair.
- There are a few rules in which experiments can be performed and hence permissions are needed. Many a times, it is very difficult to get certain permissions to carry out different methods of this research.
- Collection of data can be a problem sometimes, as it has to be collected from a variety of sources through different methods.
LEARN ABOUT: Social Communication Questionnaire
Empirical research is important in today’s world because most people believe in something only that they can see, hear or experience. It is used to validate multiple hypothesis and increase human knowledge and continue doing it to keep advancing in various fields.
For example: Pharmaceutical companies use empirical research to try out a specific drug on controlled groups or random groups to study the effect and cause. This way, they prove certain theories they had proposed for the specific drug. Such research is very important as sometimes it can lead to finding a cure for a disease that has existed for many years. It is useful in science and many other fields like history, social sciences, business, etc.
LEARN ABOUT: 12 Best Tools for Researchers
With the advancement in today’s world, empirical research has become critical and a norm in many fields to support their hypothesis and gain more knowledge. The methods mentioned above are very useful for carrying out such research. However, a number of new methods will keep coming up as the nature of new investigative questions keeps getting unique or changing.
Create a single source of real data with a built-for-insights platform. Store past data, add nuggets of insights, and import research data from various sources into a CRM for insights. Build on ever-growing research with a real-time dashboard in a unified research management platform to turn insights into knowledge.
LEARN MORE FREE TRIAL
MORE LIKE THIS
User Behavior Analytics: What it is, Importance, Uses & Tools
Sep 26, 2024
Data Security: What it is, Types, Risk & Strategies to Follow
Sep 25, 2024
User Behavior: What it is, How to Understand, Track & Uses
Sep 24, 2024
Mass Personalization is not Personalization! — Tuesday CX Thoughts
Other categories.
- Academic Research
- Artificial Intelligence
- Assessments
- Brand Awareness
- Case Studies
- Communities
- Consumer Insights
- Customer effort score
- Customer Engagement
- Customer Experience
- Customer Loyalty
- Customer Research
- Customer Satisfaction
- Employee Benefits
- Employee Engagement
- Employee Retention
- Friday Five
- General Data Protection Regulation
- Insights Hub
- Life@QuestionPro
- Market Research
- Mobile diaries
- Mobile Surveys
- New Features
- Online Communities
- Question Types
- Questionnaire
- QuestionPro Products
- Release Notes
- Research Tools and Apps
- Revenue at Risk
- Survey Templates
- Training Tips
- Tuesday CX Thoughts (TCXT)
- Uncategorized
- What’s Coming Up
- Workforce Intelligence
Empirical Social Research
An Introduction
- © 2022
- 1st edition
- View latest edition
- Michael Häder 0
Philosophische Fakultät – Institut für Soziologie, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
- All about empirical social research
- Comprehensive, up-to-date and easy to understand Completely revised and supplemented with the topics of river sampling
- Digital methods, research ethics and data protection
6133 Accesses
3 Citations
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this book
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Other ways to access
Licence this eBook for your library
Institutional subscriptions
About this book
Social science methods such as surveys, observations and content analyses are used in market research, studies of contemporary history, urban planning and communication research. They are all the more needed by sociologists and empirically working political scientists. Whether in the context of evaluating a prevention programme or for surveying health behaviour or for a study on social mobility, the confident handling of the social science instruments is always a prerequisite for obtaining reliable results. This book provides important information for users and developers of these instruments. It deals with the theoretical foundations of the methods, the steps in the conception and implementation of a project, the many variants of data collection, the methods to be used in the selection of study units, as well as the principles to be observed in the evaluation and documentation of the findings. With the help of numerous examples, a particularly clear presentation is achieved.
In the fourth, updated edition, river sampling has now been included in the selection process, digital methods are increasingly presented and, against the background of the new data protection regulation, research ethics and data protection are also updated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Research Design in the Study of the European Neighbourhood Policy
Methodological Issues in Social Research: Experience from the Twenty-First Century
Does ‘bigger’ mean ‘better’ pitfalls and shortcuts associated with big data for social research.
- Data analysis
- Data collection methods
- Knowledge of methods
- Research design
- Philosophy of science
Table of contents (10 chapters)
Front matter, the structure of this book: an introduction.
Michael Häder
The Importance of Methodological Knowledge for Understanding Empirical Data
Philosophy of science, research and investigation planning, sampling procedure, survey methods, complex designs, preparation and evaluation of the data, documentation of empirical projects, back matter.
"The compact and very understandable summary of research methods as well as the good examples." (B.A. Lena Modrow,FB Wirtschaft, Fachhochschule Westküste)
Authors and Affiliations
About the author.
Prof. em. Dr. Michael Häder was head of the Department of Methods of Empirical Social Research at the Institute of Sociology at the TU Dresden until 2018.
Bibliographic Information
Book Title : Empirical Social Research
Book Subtitle : An Introduction
Authors : Michael Häder
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37907-0
Publisher : Springer Wiesbaden
eBook Packages : Social Sciences , Social Sciences (R0)
Copyright Information : The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2022
Softcover ISBN : 978-3-658-37906-3 Published: 12 November 2022
eBook ISBN : 978-3-658-37907-0 Published: 11 November 2022
Edition Number : 1
Number of Pages : IX, 470
Number of Illustrations : 1 b/w illustrations
Topics : Methodology of the Social Sciences , Psychological Methods/Evaluation , Statistical Theory and Methods , Research Methods in Education , Research Methodology
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
Open Education Sociology Dictionary
empirical evidence
Table of Contents
Definition of Empirical Evidence
( noun ) Data gained through observation or experimentation .
Example of Empirical Evidence
- Ethnographic observations of a social scene.
Empirical Evidence Pronunciation
Pronunciation Usage Guide
Syllabification : em·pir·i·cal ev·i·dence
Audio Pronunciation
Phonetic Spelling
- American English – /im-pIR-i-kuhl Ev-uh-duhns/
- British English – /im-pIr-i-kuhl E-vi-duhns/
International Phonetic Alphabet
- American English – /ˌɛmˈpɪrɪkəl ˈɛvədəns/
- British English – /ɛmˈpɪrɪkəl ˈɛvɪdəns/
Usage Notes
- Empirical evidence is discovered through empirical research .
- empirical data
- empirical knowledge
- sense experience
Related Quotation
- “For essentialists, race , sex , sexual orientation, disability , and social class identify significant, empirically verifiable differences among people . From the essentialist perspective, each of the these exist apart from any social processes; they are objective categories of real differences among people ” (Rosenblum and Travis 2012:3).
Related Video
Additional Information
- Qualitative Research Resources – Books, Journals, and Helpful Links
- Quantitative Research Resources – Books, Journals, and Helpful Links
- Word origin of “empirical” and “evidence” – Online Etymology Dictionary: etymonline.com
Related Terms
- control group
- correlation
- experimentation
- field research
Rosenblum, Karen Elaine, and Toni-Michelle Travis. 2012. The Meaning of Difference: American Constructions of Race, Sex and Gender, Social Class, Sexual Orientation, and Disability . 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Works Consulted
Griffiths, Heather, Nathan Keirns, Eric Strayer, Susan Cody-Rydzewski, Gail Scaramuzzo, Tommy Sadler, Sally Vyain, Jeff Bry, Faye Jones. 2016. Introduction to Sociology 2e . Houston, TX: OpenStax.
Macionis, John. 2012. Sociology . 14th ed. Boston: Pearson.
Macionis, John, and Kenneth Plummer. 2012. Sociology: A Global Introduction . 4th ed. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
Merriam-Webster. (N.d.) Merriam-Webster Dictionary . ( http://www.merriam-webster.com/ ).
Oxford University Press. (N.d.) Oxford Dictionaries . ( https://www.oxforddictionaries.com/ ).
Random House Webster’s College Dictionary . 1997. New York: Random House.
Scott, John, and Gordon Marshall. 2005. A Dictionary of Sociology . New York: Oxford University Press.
Thorpe, Christopher, Chris Yuill, Mitchell Hobbs, Sarah Tomley, and Marcus Weeks. 2015. The Sociology Book: Big Ideas Simply Explained . London: Dorling Kindersley.
Turner, Bryan S., ed. 2006. The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wikipedia contributors. (N.d.) Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia . Wikimedia Foundation. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/ ).
Cite the Definition of Empirical Evidence
ASA – American Sociological Association (5th edition)
Bell, Kenton, ed. 2013. “empirical evidence.” In Open Education Sociology Dictionary . Retrieved September 27, 2024 ( https://sociologydictionary.org/empirical-evidence/ ).
APA – American Psychological Association (6th edition)
empirical evidence. (2013). In K. Bell (Ed.), Open education sociology dictionary . Retrieved from https://sociologydictionary.org/empirical-evidence/
Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date – Chicago Manual of Style (16th edition)
Bell, Kenton, ed. 2013. “empirical evidence.” In Open Education Sociology Dictionary . Accessed September 27, 2024. https://sociologydictionary.org/empirical-evidence/ .
MLA – Modern Language Association (7th edition)
“empirical evidence.” Open Education Sociology Dictionary . Ed. Kenton Bell. 2013. Web. 27 Sep. 2024. < https://sociologydictionary.org/empirical-evidence/ >.
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St. Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Sociology vs. Psychology: A Comparative Analysis of Human Behavior and Social Structures
- Nicole Jose
- September 23, 2024
Introduction
The study of human behavior is complex, encompassing various disciplines, methodologies, and perspectives. Among the most prominent disciplines are sociology and psychology, which seek to understand human actions, though from different viewpoints. Sociology explores the dynamics of social structures, relationships, and societal influences on behavior, while psychology focuses on the individual’s internal processes, such as cognition, emotion, and mental health. This article presents a comparative analysis of sociology vs psychology, examining their unique methodologies, core theories, and real-world applications.
Definition and Scope
What is sociology.
Sociology is the scientific study of societies and social institutions and the relationships that emerge within and between them. Sociologists are interested in the collective behaviors and patterns that emerge in group settings, particularly how social structures such as class, race, family, and religion influence individuals. Common methods in sociology include qualitative approaches like ethnography and interviews, as well as quantitative methods such as statistical surveys. The macro-level perspective enables researchers to assess broad societal trends and their effects on specific populations.
What is Psychology?
Psychology, conversely, is the study of the human mind, behavior, and mental processes. Psychologists examine individual behaviors and mental states, focusing on cognition, emotion, perception, and personality development. Psychology’s methodologies are often empirical, relying on controlled experiments, case studies, and clinical assessments to generate data. This micro-level approach allows for a deep understanding of individual behavior, offering insights into mental health, learning processes, and emotional regulation.
When comparing psychology vs sociology, it becomes clear that while both disciplines aim to understand human behavior, they operate at different levels of analysis—individual vs. societal.
Core Theories and Concepts
Sociology is grounded in several foundational theories that shape its research. Social constructivism, for example, posits that societal realities are constructed through human interaction. Conflict theory, largely inspired by Karl Marx’s work, focuses on how power differentials in society lead to inequality and social change . Symbolic interactionism emphasizes the role of symbols and language in shaping social interactions and relationships. These theories enable sociologists to explore how social institutions like education, government, and family influence behavior and societal outcomes.
Psychology’s theoretical foundations differ significantly from those of sociology. Cognitive-behavioral theory, for instance, investigates how thought patterns influence behavior and emotion, forming the basis for much of modern psychotherapy. Psychoanalysis, first developed by Sigmund Freud , delves into unconscious motivations and early childhood experiences as determinants of adult behavior. Humanistic psychology, championed by figures like Carl Rogers, emphasizes personal growth, self-actualization, and the intrinsic worth of the individual. These theories have broad applications, ranging from clinical treatment to educational psychology.
In comparing social psychology vs sociology, it’s important to recognize that social psychology bridges these two fields, examining how social contexts influence individual behavior.
Methodological Differences
Sociological approaches.
Sociologists typically employ macro-level and micro-level analyses. Macro-level analysis examines broad societal phenomena, such as social stratification, migration trends, and public policy. In contrast, micro-level analysis examines smaller group interactions, such as family dynamics or peer relationships. Researchers may use large-scale surveys, demographic studies, or ethnographic fieldwork to collect data on societal trends and social interactions.
Psychological Approaches
Psychology relies more heavily on controlled experiments, clinical trials, and case studies. These methods allow psychologists to isolate variables and draw precise conclusions about individual behavior. For example, a psychologist might experiment to assess the effectiveness of a new cognitive-behavioral therapy for treating anxiety or a case study to understand the development of a rare psychological disorder.
This distinction between sociology vs social psychology further emphasizes how sociology focuses on external societal forces, while psychology often seeks to understand internal cognitive and emotional processes.
Applications in Real-World Contexts
Sociology in action.
Sociology plays a critical role in understanding and addressing social issues. By analyzing how race, gender, class, and other social factors affect life outcomes, sociologists can inform public policies to reduce inequality. For instance, sociological research on educational access has contributed to the development of affirmative action policies. Sociologists also work in public health, urban development, and criminal justice, applying their insights to create more equitable social systems .
Psychology in Action
Psychology is instrumental in mental health treatment, educational development, and organizational behavior. Clinical psychologists treat mental health disorders through therapies grounded in empirical research. Educational psychologists work with schools to develop strategies that enhance students’ learning outcomes, often through cognitive assessments and interventions. Psychologists also contribute to marketing and human resources, helping organizations understand consumer behavior or improve employee well-being.
Understanding sociology vs psychology which is easier depends largely on the individual’s strengths and interests. Those interested in systemic societal issues may find sociology more accessible, while those drawn to individual behavior and mental processes may prefer psychology.
Overlaps and Interdisciplinary Work
Shared interest in human behavior.
While sociology vs psychology are distinct in their scope and methodologies, they share a common interest in understanding human behavior. Social psychology vs sociology is an especially relevant intersection, as social psychology focuses on how societal norms, group dynamics, and relationships influence individual behaviors. This subfield integrates concepts from both disciplines to study phenomena such as conformity, aggression, and group decision-making.
Interdisciplinary Research
Interdisciplinary work combining insights from sociology and psychology can provide a more comprehensive understanding of social phenomena. For instance, research on public health often incorporates sociological perspectives on access to care alongside psychological research on health behaviors. Similarly, studies on education frequently blend sociological insights about school systems with psychological theories on learning and motivation.
The comparative analysis of sociology vs psychology reveals that while these fields share a common goal of understanding human behavior, their approaches and focus areas are distinct. Sociology investigates the influence of societal structures on behavior, employing large-scale methods to analyze trends and inequalities. Conversely, psychology concentrates on individual cognition and emotion, using controlled experiments and clinical methods to conclude personal behavior.
Ultimately, sociology and psychology offer valuable insights into the complexities of human life. Combining perspectives from both fields—particularly through subfields like social psychology—can lead to more holistic solutions to real-world problems for those seeking to understand individual behavior within a societal context. The question of sociology vs psychology which is easier, is subjective, as each discipline presents its challenges and rewards depending on the learner’s interests and strengths.
Last Articles
Empirical Evidence
It refers to the evidence formed by or available to sensory experiences, such as auditory or visual experiences, and in a broader sense, it also includes recollections and self-examination. In psychology, sociology, philosophy, and law, it is essential.
Sociological Explanation
Empirical knowledge requires empirical evidence, whose validity or refutation relies on experience or experiment. The primary source of such evidence is experimentation and observation.
This approach is a critical component of social science research methods, and it helps us comprehend social problems and prove or refute a theory.
Qualitative evidence and quantitative evidence are the two main categories of empirical evidence. The sort of data that represents non-measurable knowledge is known as qualitative evidence. Numerical data that may be further investigated using statistical techniques are referred to as quantitative evidence.
Research data collection from families affected by the suicide of a member is used to study about prevention of suicide. The research results are evidence that policymakers can apply to create laws and regulations that can stop suicidal tendencies.
Related Posts:
- Applied Social Psychology Definition & Explanation
- Action Research Definition & Explanation
- Age Definition & Explanation
- Anthropology Definition & Explanation
- Action Theory Definition & Explanation
- Anthrozoology Definition and Explanation
- Antagonism Definition & Explanation
- Apprenticeship Definition & Explanation
- Archaeology Definition & Explanation
- Antinaturalism Definition & Explanation
COMMENTS
Definition of Empirical Research. Research employing empirical evidence is known as empirical research, which entails observing and measuring events as the investigator personally witnesses them. It obtains information from practical exposure instead of concept or assumption since it is built on observed and measurable events. Sociological ...
What Is Empirical Social Research?Most research methods textbooks start their discussion of research by describing the scientific method, with its focus on total objectivity, replicability, and highly struc-tured procedures. There is, however, great debate among sociologists as to whether sociology is a science and eve.
Empirical research is based on observed and measured phenomena and derives knowledge from actual experience rather than from theory or belief. How do you know if a study is empirical? Read the subheadings within the article, book, or report and look for a description of the research "methodology."
Empirical research forms the backbone of sociological inquiry, grounding theoretical perspectives in observable and measurable phenomena. This essay will outline and explain the concept of "empirical" in sociology, providing an academic discussion suitable for an undergraduate audience.
Empirical research methodologies can be described as quantitative, qualitative, or a mix of both (usually called mixed-methods). Ruane (2016) (UofM login required) gets at the basic differences in approach between quantitative and qualitative research: Quantitative research -- an approach to documenting reality that relies heavily on numbers both for the measurement of variables and for data ...
Empirical sociology is the study of sociology based on methodological methods and techniques for collecting, processing, and communicating primary sociological information. Describes the situation of the aspects of social life such as economy, law, family, and politics during the research. [1] Empirical sociology is often concerned with aspects of everyday life with common sense, which it ...
Describe the differences in accuracy, reliability and validity in a research study. When sociologists apply the sociological perspective and begin to ask questions, no topic is off limits. Every aspect of human behavior is a source of possible investigation. Sociologists question the world that humans have created and live in.
Definition of Empirical. Empirical knowledge is acquired from methodical observation or experimentation instead of speculative statements or theoretical knowledge. Such studies are based on research that produces actual facts, such as statistics or interview transcripts, as opposed to works of theory. Sociological Explanation
The empirical approach is fundamentally about evidence. It mandates that any conclusions about human society should be rooted in data gathered through direct observation or experience. Unlike theoretical research that might rely on abstract reasoning or predictive models, empirical research seeks concrete, observable data as its foundation.
Hence, empirical research is a method of uncovering empirical evidence. Through the process of gathering valid empirical data, scientists from a variety of fields, ranging from the social to the natural sciences, have to carefully design their methods. This helps to ensure quality and accuracy of data collection and treatment.
An empirical research article reports research based on actual observation or experiment. The research may use quantitative or qualitative research methods. Quantitative Research uses numerical data to try to establish causal relationships between variables ("Based on 100 interactions, A causes B.") Qualitative Research objectively and ...
It is defined by its commitment to systematic observation of the empirical world and strives to be objective, critical, skeptical, and logical. It involves a series of prescribed steps that have been established over centuries of scholarship. Figure 2.2. The scientific method is an essential tool in research.
Sociology, History of. Johan Goudsblom, Johan Heilbron, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), 2015. The Formation of an Intellectual Discipline (1830-90) In the course of the nineteenth century, empirical social research became a regular and organized endeavor. Most of it was centered on the 'social question' and intimately linked with ...
Sociological research attempts to answer a vast array of questions, such as these and more, about our social world. Sociologists use empirical data and/or an interpretative framework to increase understanding of societies and social interactions, but in all cases research begins with the pursuit of an answer to a question.
Empirical research is defined as any study whose conclusions are exclusively derived from concrete, verifiable evidence. The term empirical basically means that it is guided by scientific experimentation and/or evidence. Likewise, a study is empirical when it uses real-world evidence in investigating its assertions.
Definition of an empirical study: An empirical research article reports the results of a study that uses data derived from actual observation or experimentation. Empirical research articles are examples of primary research. ... Sociological Methods and Research; Databases that contain empirical research: (selected list only)
Empirical evidence is subject to assessments of its validity. Validity can be internal, involving the soundness of an experiment's design and execution and the accuracy of subsequent data analysis , or external, involving generalizability to other research contexts ( see ecological validity ).
Definition of Empiricism. Empiricism refers to using empirical techniques in place of a more comprehensive theoretical framework in scientific inquiry. It is a way of thinking about knowledge that says the only way to know anything is through direct experience through the senses. It is a method that opposes the notion that, for instance ...
Empirical research is defined as any research where conclusions of the study is strictly drawn from concretely empirical evidence, and therefore "verifiable" evidence. This empirical evidence can be gathered using quantitative market research and qualitative market research methods. For example: A research is being conducted to find out if ...
eBook ISBN 978-3-658-37907- Published: 11 November 2022. Edition Number 1. Number of Pages IX, 470. Number of Illustrations 1 b/w illustrations. Topics Methodology of the Social Sciences, Psychological Methods/Evaluation, Statistical Theory and Methods, Research Methods in Education, Research Methodology.
Related Quotation. "For essentialists, race, sex, sexual orientation, disability, and social class identify significant, empirically verifiable differences among people. From the essentialist perspective, each of the these exist apart from any social processes; they are objective categories of real differences among people " (Rosenblum and ...
Definition and Scope What is Sociology? Sociology is the scientific study of societies and social institutions and the relationships that emerge within and between them. ... Clinical psychologists treat mental health disorders through therapies grounded in empirical research. Educational psychologists work with schools to develop strategies ...
Empirical knowledge requires empirical evidence, whose validity or refutation relies on experience or experiment. The primary source of such evidence is experimentation and observation. This approach is a critical component of social science research methods, and it helps us comprehend social problems and prove or refute a theory.
The results of the systematic literature review of empirical studies addressed our research questions using the PEO framework (Bettany-Saltikov, 2012). For the letter P as a population and its problems, we determined the phrase "parents who are victims of violence by adult children" and the word "society," for E exposure to the term ...