anna karenina movie reviews

an image, when javascript is unavailable

By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy . We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Review: ‘Anna Karenina’ Is A Bold Reimagining Of A Classic That’s (Mostly) Thrilling & Inventive

Oliver lyttelton.

Share on Facebook
Share to Flipboard
Share on LinkedIn
Show more sharing options
Submit to Reddit
Post to Tumblr
Print This Page
Share on WhatsApp

When it was announced that Joe Wright was going to direct a new film version of Leo Tolstoy ‘s “ Anna Karenina ,” starring his cinematic muse Keira Knightley , most people probably knew what to expect. After all, the two had collaborated on both Wright’s debut “ Pride & Prejudice ” and “ Atonement ” (both also produced by Working Title Films ) and it was easy to assume that their take on the Russian classic would be along similar lines; a handsome period piece taking advantage of the best British actors available, and with a few showy camera touches that would set it apart from your average costume drama.

And in some ways, they would be right. But as it turns out, Wright, presumably let free a little by his experimental pop-art action movie “ Hanna ” last year, was up to something bolder: a heavily stylized, theatrical version that takes the story and sets most (but not quite all) of it within the confines of grand, but faded, theater, making sure the artifice is never concealed. Would it be an ingenious reimagining of an oft-told tale (last seen on the big screen in Bernard Rose ‘s 1997 version, starring Sophie Marceau and Sean Bean )? Or a style-over-substance take that attempts to fix what was never broken? Despite a conceit that isn’t 100% watertight, it’s happily closer to the former, thanks to Wright’s bold vision, a tremendous adaptation by Sir Tom Stoppard , and a superb cast.

Related Stories Jude Law Flaunts His Britishness, Calling the Criterion Closet a ‘Cupboard’ Jude Law Thinks It’s Unlikely ‘Fantastic Beasts’ Franchise Will Return: ‘It’s Certainly On Hold’

The plot for the most part remains the same; indeed, Stoppard has somehow managed to put together something more faithful than the novel than most takes, despite a just-this-side-of-a-bum-numbing 130 minute running time. Anna Karenina (Knightley), who married and had a son with her successful St. Petersburg politician husband Alexei Karenin ( Jude Law ) at a young age, comes to Moscow to visit her brother, Oblonsky ( Matthew Macfadyen , bedecked in a magnificent walrus mustache), who’s just been caught philandering with the governess by his wife Dolly ( Kelly Macdonald ). There’s another visitor in town too, Oblonsky’s friend Levin ( Domhnall Gleeson ), a simple farmer, who’s come to propose to the object of his affections, Dolly’s sister Kitty ( Alicia Vikander ).

But Kitty is in turn in love with young soldier Count Vronsky ( Aaron Taylor-Johnson ), and rebuffs a heartbroken Levin. But she’s soon just as disappointed as Anna and Vronsky meet at a ball, and fall passionately in love. She initally tries to resist, but when Vronsky follows her to St. Petersburg, a passionate affair begins, one that can only have tragic consequences…

Title aside, it’s surprising the degree to which Stoppard’s script focuses on those who aren’t Anna, and Levin in particular, and it’s this approach that’s key to Wright’s grand conceit. He’s a pastoral fellow, one who’s happier with the simple pleasures, in marked contrast to the trivial frolicking of the city classes, and the director drives this home by shooting all of the Moscow and St. Petersburg scenes within the grand, theatrical soundstage (which even includes rafters and backstage areas, hammering home its Brechtian nature), and opening out to location work when Levin returns to the countryside for a life of purity and goodness.

It’s a neat way to encapsulate one of the novels’ major fascinations, and for the most part, it works both thematically and cinematically. Many may get turned off early on by the sheer theatricality, particularly as Wright launches into it at full speed, with a dizzying opening reel. One imagines, from the red curtain and prosecenium arch that make up the first image on screen that Baz Luhrmann was something of an inspiration, but the director settles down from a manic opening, and it begins to feel more like the bold, technicolor work of Powell & Pressburger than anything else. And after that bumpy opening, it starts to feel like second nature, even when the space is transformed into an ice rink, a train station, or, most memorably, a racetrack.

For one, the film looks truly stunning, thanks to spectacular costume and production design work, and some of Wright and DoP Seamus McGarvey ‘s now trademark tracking shots (which somehow feel less shoehorned-in or at least, more in keeping with the style of the piece as a whole, than in previous work), while McGarvey embraces the nature of the concept with some beautiful, and very theatrical lighting. Crucially, the artifice also doesn’t overwhelm the performances, or the narrative. We certainly bought into the situation as much as we would have in a more traditional approach.

It’s a shame, then, that Wright leaves seemingly leaves some holes in his conceit. It makes sense — indeed, it’s hugely refreshing — when the theater’s doors open, and Levin walks out into the snow. Only then do you realize how claustrophobic and confining it’s felt within Russian society. But it feels less thematically well-reasoned when Anna and Vronsky romp together in the countryside. Is their love the kind of purity of existence that Levin seeks? Have they been freed from society? It starts to pull at the threads of the universe that Wright’s established, which is a shame when the rest of it seems to have been so carefully planned out. It doesn’t help that some of the interior scenes with Levin feel just as claustrophobic — the first time he retreats to his cottage, you might as well be back inside the theater.

It’s a shame, given that Wright gets about 90% of the way, but it’s also fortunate, then, that the foundations on which the theater are built, as it were, are so solid. Stoppard’s script is occasionally a little muddy when it comes to geography and character relations, but for the most part it fits an expansive tale into the running time (which reaches its conclusion just as you start to feel it) elegantly and inventively, and manages to feature wit, poetry and real feeling as well. It’s virtually the model for a good adaptation.

Almost without exception, the cast are terrific too. Knightley continues to go from strength to strength with each project, giving Anna a flightiness and impulsiveness that feel almost more like an Ibsen heroine than a Tolstoy one, but it’s a smart take on the character, and she truly impresses when she lets the fireworks fly towards the end. Law is excellent too, in a part that’s older and more buttoned-up than the kind he normally gets; the perspective of the script is more empathetic to Karenin than you might expect, and the actor succeeds entirely in giving you reason to feel for him, while also making you understand why Anna might turn elsewhere.

They’re the bigger names in the ensemble, but it’s one of real depth and variety; so much so that one feels that certain cast members get short shrift. Emily Watson, Shirley Henderson and Olivia Williams feel particularly underused, while a rising star like Vicky McClure (“ This Is England “) crops up, only to be denied a line at all. Still, several actors do manage to make a real impression. Matthew MacFayden is enjoyably broad, a world away from his Mr. Darcy, as Oblonsky, threatening, but never quite managing to, tip into caricature, and his approach pays off beautifully with a single heartbreaking shot near the end. And as his wife, Kelly MacDonald perhaps doesn’t get as much screen time as we’d like, but she’s also warm, sweet and smarter than she might at first appear.

Best of all are Domnhal Gleeson and Alicia Vikander, as faltering would-be lovers Levin and Kitty. They’re the least well-known names among the principal cast, but on this basis, it’s unlikely to remain that way for long. Gleeson effortlessly shows the good-hearted nature of Levin, but isn’t afraid to dig into the hypocrisy of the character, while Vikander does wonders with a tricky part that’s written on the page as to be almost saint-like, but she never lets you forget the real human being there as well. The two have great chemistry together, as well, with one scene involving letter-blocks that’s more romantic and sensual than a dozen sex scenes. The lone disappointement is Taylor-Johnson; he acquits himself fairly well for much of the film without ever quite impressing, and starts to feel a little out of his depth by the time the stakes are raised.

We suspect, all in all, that the film is going to divide people enormously. There’ll be some who get turned off the concept from the start and never get on board. And that’s fine, but we hope they don’t miss the pleasures the film contains as a result — McGarvey’s spectacular camerawork, Dario Marianelli ‘s handsome score, weaving niftily between being diagetic and non-diagetic and the intelligence and intimacy of the performances. As for ourselves, we found it both fascinatingly theatrical and thrillingly cinematic, a picture that’s lingered on our minds more than we expected, and while not quite an unreserved cause for celebration, it’s a film that we cherish despite its flaws. [B+]

Most Popular

Log in or sign up for Rotten Tomatoes

Trouble logging in?

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes.

Email not verified

Let's keep in touch.

Sign up for the Rotten Tomatoes newsletter to get weekly updates on:

Upcoming Movies and TV shows
Rotten Tomatoes Podcast
Media News + More

By clicking "Sign Me Up," you are agreeing to receive occasional emails and communications from Fandango Media (Fandango, Vudu, and Rotten Tomatoes) and consenting to Fandango's Privacy Policy and Terms and Policies . Please allow 10 business days for your account to reflect your preferences.

OK, got it!

About Rotten Tomatoes®
Login/signup

Movies in theaters

Opening This Week
Top Box Office
Coming Soon to Theaters
Certified Fresh Movies

Movies at Home

Fandango at Home
Prime Video
Most Popular Streaming Movies
What to Watch New

Certified fresh picks

82% Emilia Pérez Link to Emilia Pérez
95% A Real Pain Link to A Real Pain
100% All We Imagine as Light Link to All We Imagine as Light

New TV Tonight

95% Say Nothing: Season 1
90% Silo: Season 2
82% The Day of the Jackal: Season 1
88% St. Denis Medical: Season 1
81% Bad Sisters: Season 2
84% Yellowstone: Season 5
81% Cobra Kai: Season 6
70% Cross: Season 1
75% The Creep Tapes: Season 1
-- It's All Country: Season 1

Anna Karenina Reviews

While even skilled filmmakers would have trouble adapting Tolstoy’s novel in a straightforward form, Wright attempts a book-to-stage-to-film approach and, for the first time in his career, stretched his considerable talent thin.

Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4 | Sep 20, 2022

The machinery of the music box comes undone in our hands, but the light dancing on the little silver gears is still so beautiful and heartbreaking.

Full Review | Jul 2, 2021

The characters, so beautifully drawn by Tolstoy, are severely truncated in the film, functioning as relatively impoverished figures.

Full Review | Feb 28, 2021

Anna Karenina is a boldly constructed and beautiful film.

Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4.0 | Sep 2, 2020

Enthralling, moving, exhilarating. Majestic and sweeping. The best and most brilliant interpretation of Tolstoy I have ever seen.

Full Review | Nov 27, 2019

One has to applaud Joe Wright's interpretation of 'Anna Karenina' which is a play on the Shakespeare adage, "All the world's a stage, And all the men and women merely players"

Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Oct 31, 2019

All of this calculated design, which plays like an astutely choreographed musical without any discernible music, only mutes our feelings for the roiling, raging passionate affair that's supposed to be transpiring before our eyes.

Full Review | Aug 6, 2019

A radiant Keira Knightley brings more depth to Tolstoy's heroine than you would ever expect. An ingenious adaptation, scripted by Tom Stoppard, frames lush visuals with a trompe l'oeil theatrical setting...

Full Review | Jul 31, 2019

Its nearly flawless craft is done at the expense of the story rather than in service of it, and that I think is its fatal mistake.

Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4 | Jun 8, 2019

Anna Karenina drags in the middle and rushes to its ugly end but the sets, the choreography, the glorious costumes and the secondary characters are pieces of a superior film.

Full Review | Feb 26, 2019

Heavily flawed and unapologetically indulgent, strong performances from its all-star cast and several sumptuous set-pieces just about set Wright's Anna Karenina aside from the madding crowd of bland costume romps.

Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Feb 2, 2019

The constant flashes Anna has of a train rolling on a track -- an obvious foreshadow of her fate -- are beyond ridiculous.

Full Review | Original Score: 2/4 | Dec 20, 2018

Wright has said he did not wish to make 'yet another period drama', and he's achieved this, has explored something new, but at an emotional cost.

Full Review | Sep 1, 2018

This Anna Karenina might not be Tolstoy, but it's the next best thing to a Baz Luhrmann extravaganza, and with even better costumes. The conceit is ingenious, the execution breathtaking (or breathless at a minimum).

Full Review | Jan 9, 2018

It's far from a perfect film, but Anna Karenina should be praised for its attempt to reinvent the wheel of stuffy costume-clad Masterpiece Theater for the big screen.

Full Review | Original Score: B- | Sep 7, 2017

At times, the theater-as-life concept creates too much emotional distance from the characters, but the actors give such human, sympathetic performances that even the biggest Anna fans will find themselves hoping for a happier ending.

Full Review | Oct 5, 2016

It makes for a wonderfully adventurous adaptation that is at times quite thrilling, but one which too often misses the mark.

Full Review | Original Score: 3.5/5 | May 17, 2016

[Lack of] clarity is this slick adaptation's biggest fault.

Full Review | Original Score: 5.5/10 | Aug 17, 2014

The look is gorgeous, of course, but seldom has so much aestheticization served so much heartlessness.

Full Review | Nov 5, 2013

So can we somehow make a bargain with the film world: no more Anna Kareninas? You're making idiots of yourselves.

Full Review | Jun 14, 2013