methodology section quantitative research

USC Libraries
Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

6. The Methodology
Purpose of Guide
Design Flaws to Avoid
Independent and Dependent Variables
Glossary of Research Terms
Reading Research Effectively
Narrowing a Topic Idea
Broadening a Topic Idea
Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
Academic Writing Style
Applying Critical Thinking
Choosing a Title
Making an Outline
Paragraph Development
Research Process Video Series
Executive Summary
The C.A.R.S. Model
Background Information
The Research Problem/Question
Theoretical Framework
Citation Tracking
Content Alert Services
Evaluating Sources
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Tiertiary Sources
Scholarly vs. Popular Resources
Qualitative Methods
Quantitative Methods
Insiderness
Using Non-Textual Elements
Limitations of the Study
Common Grammar Mistakes
Writing Concisely
Avoiding Plagiarism
Footnotes or Endnotes?
Further Readings
Generative AI and Writing
USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
Bibliography

The methods section describes actions taken to investigate the research problem and the rationale for the application of specific procedures or techniques used to identify, select, process, and analyze information applied to understanding the problem, thereby, allowing the reader to critically evaluate a study’s overall validity and reliability. The methodology section of a research paper answers two main questions: How was the data collected or generated? And, how was it analyzed? The writing should be direct and precise and always written in the past tense.

Kallet, Richard H. "How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper." Respiratory Care 49 (October 2004): 1229-1232.

Importance of a Good Methodology Section

You must explain how you obtained and analyzed your results for the following reasons:

Readers need to know how the data was obtained because the method you chose affects the results and, by extension, how you interpreted their significance in the discussion section of your paper.
Methodology is crucial for any branch of scholarship because an unreliable method produces unreliable results and, as a consequence, undermines the value of your analysis of the findings.
In most cases, there are a variety of different methods you can choose to investigate a research problem. The methodology section of your paper clearly articulates the reasons why you have chosen a particular procedure or technique.
The reader wants to know that the data was collected or generated in a way that is consistent with accepted practice in the field of study. For example, if you are using a multiple choice questionnaire, readers need to know that it offered your respondents a reasonable range of answers to choose from.
The method must be appropriate to fulfilling the overall aims of the study. For example, you need to ensure that you have a large enough sample size to be able to generalize and make recommendations based on the findings.
The methodology should discuss the problems that were anticipated and the steps you took to prevent them from occurring. For any problems that do arise, you must describe the ways in which they were minimized or why these problems do not impact in any meaningful way your interpretation of the findings.
In the social and behavioral sciences, it is important to always provide sufficient information to allow other researchers to adopt or replicate your methodology. This information is particularly important when a new method has been developed or an innovative use of an existing method is utilized.
In a qualitative study, the reader needs to know that standard protocols concerning how you treated any human subjects were correctly followed [e.g., people you observed and interviewed] and how you controlled for your presence in the study as the primary instrument for gathering information during interactions with respondents.

Bem, Daryl J. Writing the Empirical Journal Article. Psychology Writing Center. University of Washington; Denscombe, Martyn. The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects . 5th edition. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 2014; Lunenburg, Frederick C. Writing a Successful Thesis or Dissertation: Tips and Strategies for Students in the Social and Behavioral Sciences . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2008.

Structure and Writing Style

I. Groups of Research Methods

There are two main groups of research methods in the social sciences:

The e mpirical-analytical group approaches the study of social sciences in a similar manner that researchers study the natural sciences . This type of research focuses on objective knowledge, research questions that can be answered yes or no, and operational definitions of variables to be measured. The empirical-analytical group employs deductive reasoning that uses existing theory as a foundation for formulating hypotheses that need to be tested. This approach is focused on explanation.
The i nterpretative group of methods is focused on understanding phenomenon in a comprehensive, holistic way . Interpretive methods focus on analytically disclosing the meaning-making practices of human subjects [the why, how, or by what means people do what they do], while showing how those practices arrange so that it can be used to generate observable outcomes. Interpretive methods allow you to recognize your connection to the phenomena under investigation. However, the interpretative group requires careful examination of variables because it focuses more on subjective knowledge.

In both groups of research methods, the outcomes of applying methodological techniques for gathering and interpreting information are referred to as "findings" or "results."

II. Content

The introduction to your methodology section should begin by restating the research problem and the theory and underlying assumptions underpinning your study. This is followed by situating the methods you used to gather, analyze, and process information within the overall “tradition” of your field of study and within the particular research design you have chosen to study the problem [i.e., In this case study, I conducted a content analysis of..."]. If the method you choose lies outside of the tradition of your field [i.e., the review of the literature demonstrates that the method is not commonly used], provide a justification for how your choice of methods specifically addresses the research problem in ways that could reveal new insights or understandings. Explain why is this approach important but do not interpret the outcomes until the discussion section of your paper.

The remainder of your methodology section should describe the following:

Decisions made in selecting the data you have analyzed or, in the case of qualitative research, the subjects and research setting you have examined,
Tools and methods used to identify and collect information, and how you identified relevant variables,
The ways in which you processed the information and the procedures you used to analyze that information, and
The specific research tools or strategies that you utilized to study the underlying hypothesis and research questions.

In addition, an effectively written methodology section should:

Re-introduce the overall methodological approach for investigating your research problem . Is your study qualitative or quantitative or a combination of both (mixed method)? Are you going to take a special approach, such as action research, or a more neutral stance?
Indicate how the approach fits the overall research design . Your methods for gathering information should have a clear connection to the research problem. In other words, make sure that your methods will actually address the problem. One of the most common deficiencies found in research papers is that the proposed methodology is not suitable to achieving the stated objective of your paper.
Describe the specific methods for collecting information that you used , such as, surveys, interviews, questionnaires, observation, archival research, etc. If you are analyzing existing information, such as a data set or archival documents, describe how it was originally created or gathered and by whom. Also be sure to explain how older data is still relevant to investigating the current research problem.
Explain how you intend to analyze your results . Will you use statistical analysis? Will you use specific theoretical perspectives to help you analyze a text or explain observed behaviors? Describe how you plan to obtain an accurate assessment of relationships, patterns, trends, distributions, and possible contradictions found in the data.
Provide background and a rationale for methodologies that are unfamiliar for your readers . Very often in the social and behavioral sciences, research problems and the methods for investigating them require more explanation and rationale than widely accepted rules governing the natural and physical sciences. Be clear and concise in your explanation.
Provide a justification for subject selection and sampling procedure . For instance, if you propose to conduct interviews, how do you intend to select the sample population? If you are analyzing texts, which texts have you chosen, and why? If you are using statistics, why is this set of data being used? If other data sources exist, explain why the data you chose is most appropriate to addressing the research problem.
Provide a justification for case study selection . A common method of analyzing research problems in the social sciences is to analyze specific cases. These can be a person, place, event, phenomenon, or other type of subject of analysis that are either examined as a singular topic of in-depth investigation or multiple topics of investigation studied for the purpose of comparing or contrasting findings. In either approach, you should explain why the case or cases were chosen and how they relate to understanding the research problem.
Describe potential limitations . Are there any practical limitations that could affect your data collection? How will you attempt to control for potential confounding variables and errors? If your methodology may lead to problems you can anticipate, state this openly and show why pursuing this methodology outweighs the risk of these problems cropping up.

NOTE: Once you have written all of the elements of the methods section, subsequent revisions should focus on how to present those elements as clearly and as logically as possibly. The description of how you prepared to study the research problem, how you gathered the information, and the protocol for analyzing the information should be organized chronologically. For clarity, when a large amount of detail must be presented, information should be presented in sub-sections according to topic. If necessary, consider using appendices for raw data.

ANOTHER NOTE: If you are conducting a qualitative analysis of a research problem , the methodology section generally requires a more elaborate description of the methods used as well as an explanation of the processes applied to gathering and analyzing the information than is generally required for studies using quantitative methods. Because you are the primary instrument for generating the information [e.g., through interviews or observations], the process for collecting that information has a significantly greater impact on producing the findings. Therefore, qualitative research requires a more detailed description of the methods used.

YET ANOTHER NOTE: If your study involves interviews, observations, or other qualitative techniques involving human subjects , you may be required to obtain approval from the USC's Office for the Protection of Research Subjects before beginning your research. This is not a common procedure you need to follow for research and writing assignments in undergraduate classes. However, i f your professor states you need approval, you must include a statement in your methods section that you received official endorsement and adequate informed consent from the office and that there was a clear assessment and minimization of risks to participants and to the university. This statement informs the reader that your study was conducted in an ethical and responsible manner. In some cases, the approval notice is included as an appendix to your paper.

III. Problems to Avoid

Irrelevant Detail The methodology section of your paper should be thorough but concise. Do not provide any background information that does not directly help the reader understand why a particular method was chosen, how the information was gathered or obtained, and how that information was analyzed in relation to the research problem [note: analyzed, not interpreted! Save how you interpreted the findings for the discussion section]. With this in mind, the page length of your methods section will generally be less than any other section of your paper except the introduction and conclusion.

Unnecessary Explanation of Basic Procedures Remember that you are not writing a how-to guide about a particular method. You should make the assumption that readers possess a basic understanding of how to investigate the research problem on their own and, therefore, you do not have to go into great detail about specific methodological procedures. The focus should be on how you applied a method , not on the mechanics of doing a method. An exception to this rule is if you select an unconventional methodological approach; if this is the case, be sure to explain why this approach was chosen and how it enhances the overall process of discovery.

Problem Blindness It is almost a given that you will encounter problems when collecting or generating your data, or, gaps will exist in existing data or archival materials. Do not ignore these problems and pretend they did not occur. Often, documenting how you overcame obstacles can form an interesting part of how you gathered information and where gaps may exist for future research. It demonstrates to the reader that you can provide a cogent rationale for the decisions you made to minimize the impact of any problems that arose.

Literature Review Just as the literature review section of your paper provides an overview of sources you have examined while researching a particular topic, the methodology section should cite any sources that informed your choice and application of a particular method [i.e., the choice of a survey should include any citations to the works you used to help construct the survey].

It’s More than Sources of Information! A description of a research study's method should not be confused with a description of the sources of information. Such a list of sources is useful in and of itself, especially if it is accompanied by an explanation about the selection and use of the sources. The description of the project's methodology complements a list of sources in that it sets forth the organization and interpretation of information emanating from those sources.

Azevedo, L.F. et al. "How to Write a Scientific Paper: Writing the Methods Section." Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia 17 (2011): 232-238; Blair Lorrie. “Choosing a Methodology.” In Writing a Graduate Thesis or Dissertation , Teaching Writing Series. (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers 2016), pp. 49-72; Butin, Dan W. The Education Dissertation A Guide for Practitioner Scholars . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, 2010; Carter, Susan. Structuring Your Research Thesis . New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012; Kallet, Richard H. “How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper.” Respiratory Care 49 (October 2004):1229-1232; Lunenburg, Frederick C. Writing a Successful Thesis or Dissertation: Tips and Strategies for Students in the Social and Behavioral Sciences . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2008. Methods Section. The Writer’s Handbook. Writing Center. University of Wisconsin, Madison; Rudestam, Kjell Erik and Rae R. Newton. “The Method Chapter: Describing Your Research Plan.” In Surviving Your Dissertation: A Comprehensive Guide to Content and Process . (Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 2015), pp. 87-115; What is Interpretive Research. Institute of Public and International Affairs, University of Utah; Writing the Experimental Report: Methods, Results, and Discussion. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Methods and Materials. The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper. Department of Biology. Bates College.

Writing Tip

Statistical Designs and Tests? Do Not Fear Them!

Don't avoid using a quantitative approach to analyzing your research problem just because you have anxiety about applying statistical designs and tests. A qualitative approach, such as conducting interviews or content analysis of archival texts, can yield exciting new insights about a research problem, but it should not be undertaken simply because you have a disdain for running a simple regression. A well designed quantitative research study can often be accomplished in very clear and direct ways, whereas, a similar study of a qualitative nature usually requires considerable time to analyze large volumes of information and a tremendous burden to create new paths for analysis where previously no path associated with your research problem had existed.

To locate data and statistics, GO HERE .

Another Writing Tip

Knowing the Relationship Between Theories and Methods

There can be multiple meanings associated with the term "theories" and the term "methods" in social sciences research. A helpful way to delineate between them is to understand "theories" as representing different ways of characterizing the social world when you research it and "methods" as representing different ways of generating and analyzing information about that social world. Framed in this way, all empirical social sciences research involves theories and methods, whether they are stated explicitly or not. However, while theories and methods are often related, it is important that, as a researcher, you deliberately separate them in order to avoid your theories playing a disproportionate role in shaping what outcomes your chosen methods produce.

Introspectively engage in an ongoing dialectic between the application of theories and methods to help enable you to use the outcomes from your methods to interrogate and develop new theories, or ways of conceptually framing the research problem. This is how scholarship grows and branches out into new intellectual territory.

Reynolds, R. Larry. Ways of Knowing. Alternative Microeconomics . Part 1, Chapter 3. Boise State University; The Theory-Method Relationship. S-Cool Revision. United Kingdom; Dulock, Helen L., and William L. Holzemer. "Substruction: Improving the Linkage from Theory to Method." Nursing Science Quarterly 4 (Summer 1991): 83-87.

Yet Another Writing Tip

Methods and the Methodology

Do not confuse the terms "methods" and "methodology." As Schneider notes, a method refers to the technical steps taken to do research . Descriptions of methods usually include defining and stating why you have chosen specific techniques to investigate a research problem, followed by an outline of the procedures you used to systematically select, gather, and process the information [remember to always save the interpretation of information for the discussion section of your paper].

The methodology refers to a discussion of the underlying reasoning why particular methods were used . This discussion includes describing the theoretical concepts that inform the choice of methods to be applied, placing the choice of methods within the more general nature of academic work, and reviewing its relevance to examining the research problem. The methodology section also includes a thorough review of the methods other scholars have used to study the research problem.

Bryman, Alan. "Of Methods and Methodology." Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 3 (2008): 159-168; Schneider, Florian. “What's in a Methodology: The Difference between Method, Methodology, and Theory…and How to Get the Balance Right?” PoliticsEastAsia.com. Chinese Department, University of Leiden, Netherlands.

<< Previous: Scholarly vs. Popular Resources
Next: Qualitative Methods >>
Last Updated: Nov 18, 2024 10:11 AM
URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

Home » Dissertation Methodology – Structure, Example and Writing Guide

Dissertation Methodology – Structure, Example and Writing Guide

Table of Contents

Dissertation Methodology

The methodology section of a dissertation explains the approach, design, and methods you used to conduct your research. This section is critical for demonstrating the rigor and credibility of your study and allows readers to evaluate the reliability and validity of your findings. The methodology should be clear, detailed, and justified, ensuring that anyone reading it understands how and why the research was conducted.

Purpose of a Dissertation Methodology

The methodology section serves several essential purposes:

Justifies the Research Approach : Explains why specific research methods were chosen and how they align with the research question.
Describes Data Collection and Analysis : Details the tools, techniques, and procedures used to gather and analyze data.
Ensures Replicability : Provides enough detail for other researchers to replicate or build on the study.
Addresses Limitations : Identifies any limitations or constraints of the chosen methodology and their potential impact on results.

Structure of a Dissertation Methodology

A well-organized methodology section is usually structured into five main components: Research Design , Participants/Sampling , Data Collection Methods , Data Analysis , and Ethical Considerations . Some dissertations may include additional sections as needed for specific methods or fields of study.

1. Research Design

Definition : The research design is the overall strategy and framework guiding the study. It outlines whether the research is qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods and justifies this choice in relation to the research question.

Example : If studying consumer behavior, a quantitative survey might be appropriate to gather statistical data, while qualitative interviews could provide in-depth insights into motivations.

Typical Components :

Approach : Qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods.
Research Type : Experimental, observational, survey-based, case study, etc.
Justification : Explanation of why this design aligns with the research objectives.

2. Participants and Sampling

Definition : This section describes the study population, how participants were chosen, and the sample size. It should include the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, as well as details about recruitment procedures.

Example : For a study on workplace satisfaction, you might select employees from various departments in a company and use a sample size calculated based on statistical power analysis.

Target Population : The demographic characteristics and scope of the population studied.
Sampling Method : Probability or non-probability sampling (e.g., random sampling, convenience sampling).
Sample Size : The number of participants included and justification for this number.

3. Data Collection Methods

Definition : This section describes how data was collected, detailing the tools and techniques used. It should include specifics on instruments (e.g., surveys, interviews, experiments), how they were administered, and why these methods are appropriate for the study.

Example : In a study examining consumer satisfaction, data collection could involve an online survey with closed-ended questions to quantify satisfaction levels.

Tools/Procedures : Description of instruments, procedures, and protocols.
Type of Data Collected : Qualitative (e.g., interviews, focus groups) or quantitative (e.g., surveys, experiments).
Rationale : Explanation of why these data collection methods were chosen.

4. Data Analysis

Definition : Data analysis involves explaining the methods and techniques used to interpret the collected data. This includes any statistical or thematic analysis methods applied, as well as software used.

Example : For quantitative data, you might use software like SPSS or R for statistical analysis, while qualitative data could be analyzed using NVivo to identify key themes.

Techniques : Statistical tests for quantitative data (e.g., t-tests, regression analysis) or coding for qualitative data.
Software : Mention any software used, such as SPSS, R, or NVivo.
Justification : Explanation of why these analysis methods are appropriate for the research question and data.

5. Ethical Considerations

Definition : Ethical considerations involve addressing any ethical issues related to the study, such as informed consent, confidentiality, and participant welfare.

Example : In a study involving human subjects, ethical considerations might include obtaining informed consent and ensuring data anonymity.

Informed Consent : Description of how participants were informed about the study and consent obtained.
Confidentiality : Explanation of measures taken to protect participants’ privacy.
Risk Mitigation : Any procedures in place to protect participants from harm.

Example of a Dissertation Methodology

Here is a sample methodology for a hypothetical dissertation examining the impact of online learning on student engagement.

Title : The Impact of Online Learning Platforms on Student Engagement in Higher Education

This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to obtain a comprehensive understanding of student engagement in online learning. The quantitative component provides generalizable data, while the qualitative component offers in-depth insights.
Participants include 300 undergraduate students enrolled in online courses at three universities. A random sampling method was used to ensure a representative sample across different disciplines.
Data collection involved an online survey with closed-ended questions on engagement, followed by semi-structured interviews with a subset of 20 students to explore their experiences more deeply.
Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis in SPSS to assess relationships between variables. Qualitative data were coded and thematically analyzed using NVivo to identify key themes.
Ethical approval was obtained from each institution’s review board. Participants were informed of the study’s purpose, and informed consent was obtained. All responses were anonymized to ensure confidentiality.

Writing Guide for Dissertation Methodology

Step 1: choose the research design and justify it.

Begin by identifying the research design that best suits your research question. Justify your choice based on how it aligns with the study’s objectives and the type of data needed.

Example : For a dissertation on the effects of diet on physical health, a longitudinal study might be chosen to observe changes over time, with justification based on the need to monitor long-term health outcomes.

Step 2: Describe the Sampling Process

Explain the target population, sampling method, and sample size. Justify your choices by explaining how they ensure the data will be representative and reliable.

Example : A study on employee motivation might choose a random sampling method to prevent bias, ensuring that findings can be generalized to a broader workforce.

Step 3: Outline Data Collection Methods

Provide a detailed description of how data was collected, including any instruments, techniques, and procedures. Explain why these methods are appropriate for capturing the data needed to answer the research question.

Example : If measuring customer satisfaction, an online survey may be selected due to its efficiency and reach, and its questions might be chosen to quantify specific satisfaction dimensions.

Step 4: Explain Data Analysis Procedures

Describe how you analyzed the data and justify the chosen techniques. Include information on any software used and specific statistical or thematic analysis methods applied.

Example : For a quantitative study, you might perform regression analysis to explore relationships between variables. In qualitative studies, you might use thematic coding to identify patterns.

Step 5: Address Ethical Considerations

Identify any ethical issues related to your study and describe how you addressed them. Ethical considerations are crucial for studies involving human subjects, as they help protect participant rights.

Example : For a study involving interviews, explain how participants were assured of confidentiality and provided with the option to withdraw at any time.

Tips for Writing an Effective Methodology

Be Clear and Detailed : Provide enough detail so that another researcher could replicate the study based on your description.
Use Justification for Every Choice : Explain why each methodological choice is suitable for your research objectives.
Stay Objective and Neutral : Avoid using personal opinions or biases; focus on describing your research design and methods factually.
Organize Logically : Follow a logical flow, usually beginning with research design, followed by sampling, data collection, data analysis, and ethical considerations.
Keep It Concise but Comprehensive : Avoid unnecessary detail, but ensure you cover all relevant information needed to understand your methodology.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Vagueness : Avoid vague language and provide specific details for each section.
Lack of Justification : Justify all choices, from sampling methods to analytical techniques, to demonstrate thoughtfulness and rigor.
Overcomplicating Language : Use clear, straightforward language rather than overly technical jargon to improve readability.
Ignoring Limitations : Acknowledge any limitations in your methodology and discuss how they may impact the results.

The methodology section is a vital part of a dissertation, outlining the design, participants, data collection, data analysis, and ethical considerations. By following a structured approach, providing justifications for each choice, and ensuring clarity, you can write a robust methodology that supports the credibility and reliability of your research. A well-written methodology allows readers to evaluate the validity of your study and serves as a foundation for replicating or expanding upon your work.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative Research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students (7th ed.). Pearson.