What is a self-fulfilling prophecy (a definition).
Video: the pygmalion effect.
Positive versus negative self-fulfilling prophecies.
Articles related to the self-fulfilling prophecy.
Don't forget to grab our free ebook to learn how to grow your wellness business exponentially.
431 Accesses
3 Altmetric
Expectancy effect ; Pygmalion effect
The self-fulfilling prophecy holds that what a person believes about him/herself (or what others believe about them) will influence their performance. The self-fulfilling prophecy can act positively or negatively, depending on whether expectations are positive or negative.
In educational contexts, the self-fulfilling prophecy is often used to explain differences in performance among students, such that a high-performing student might be responding to high expectations from others (e.g., teachers, parents, classmates) while a low-performing student might be responding to low expectations. [ 2 ] illustrated the self-fulfilling prophecy through an experiment in which elementary school teachers treated students differently based on their initial positive expectations of those students, and over the course of the school year, students performed in ways that were consistent with teachers’ positive expectations. Subsequent...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Jones, R. A. (1977). Self-fulfilling prophecies: Social, psychological, and physiological effects of expectancies . Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom . New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Snowman, J., & Biehler, R. (2006). Psychology applied to teaching (11th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Tauber, R. T. (1997). Self-fulfilling prophecy: a practical guide to its use in education . Westport: Praeger.
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
PSY D, Saybrook University, 1870 East Fireside Drive, Meridian, ID, 83642, USA
Anne Fierro Vanderlaan
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Anne Fierro Vanderlaan .
Editors and affiliations.
Neurology, Learning and Behavior Center, 230 South 500 East, Suite 100, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102, USA
Sam Goldstein Ph.D.
Department of Psychology MS 2C6, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA
Jack A. Naglieri Ph.D. ( Professor of Psychology ) ( Professor of Psychology )
Reprints and permissions
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Cite this entry.
Vanderlaan, A. (2011). Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. In: Goldstein, S., Naglieri, J.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_2542
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_2542
Publisher Name : Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN : 978-0-387-77579-1
Online ISBN : 978-0-387-79061-9
eBook Packages : Behavioral Science Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Policies and ethics
FSU | Center for the Advancement of Teaching
Global navigation.
Center for the Advancement of Teaching
Home / News / Weekly Teaching Tips / Self-Fulfilling Prophecies
In the 1960s, Robert Rosenthal decided to test how experimenters’ unconscious expectations shaped the results of their studies. He took a group of average rats and labeled half of them bright and half of them dull before he assigned them to his experimental psychology students at Harvard. In the students’ experiments, the “bright” rats made their way through mazes more quickly. But the difference wasn’t intrinsic to the rats: Rosenthal also observed that the students working with the supposedly smarter rats handled the animals more often, and more gently.
In 1964, Rosenthal performed a similar experiment at an elementary school, with teachers and students instead of rats. He selected some students at random, and told teachers that, based on the results of a new IQ test he had administered, they could expect impressive development from these students in the coming year. The teachers’ expectations were fulfilled, and at the end of the year the selected students showed disproportionate gains over other students. Rosenthal observed significant differences in the ways teachers described the students from the two groups: teachers’ descriptions of the supposedly special students revealed that they genuinely believed that these children were more intelligent, and even more likable. Rosenthal and Jacobson concluded that not only did the teachers see what they were looking for, but their expectations caused them to treat students differently, and hence produced the outcomes they expected: they called this the Pygmalion Effect .
Even at the university level , our expectations of our students influence those students’ expectations of themselves. Our expectations, which may be unconscious, can be shaped by stereotypes , departmental culture, and our own histories. Even when we don’t intend it, our students perceive and respond to our expectations—for good or for ill—so there’s incredible potential for us to influence our students’ performance and conduct. We need to take care to make that influence both positive and just.
In practice, this might look like
If you’d like to revise an assignment or syllabus with the Pygmalion effect in mind, we’re happy to support you. You can schedule a consultation by emailing [email protected] . We look forward to working with you.
Interpreting and Responding to Student Evaluations Thurs., Oct. 4th | 1:00-3:00 p.m. | DIF 432 | Sign up to attend
Student feedback is essential for reflecting on our course designs and teaching practices, but finding out how students responded to us, and to our courses, can be an emotional, sometimes overwhelming experience. In this interactive workshop, we will share strategies for analyzing and interpreting the data collected at the end of each semester, and help you to make the best use of the feedback students provide in their comments. We’ll also discuss a variety of effective ways to collect feedback from students throughout the semester, so you don’t have to wait until a course is over to adjust it for better results.
Exam Design Workshop Tues., Oct. 23rd | 2:00-4:00 p.m. | DIF 432 | Sign up to attend
Test what you want to be testing. During this session, we’ll work on designing exams that are not only accurate measures of student learning in your course, but also learning opportunities themselves.
Open Textbook Workshop Thurs., Oct. 25rd | 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. | Bradley Reading Room, Strozier Library
The Office of the Provost is sponsoring a workshop to introduce faculty to open textbooks and the benefits they can bring to student learning, faculty pedagogical practice, and social justice on campus. Participating faculty will be invited to engage with an open textbook in their discipline by writing a brief review, for which they will be eligible to receive a $200 stipend . Interested faculty are invited to apply by Friday, October 12th .
If you have questions about this workshop or open textbooks, please contact Devin Soper, Scholarly Communications Librarian, at 850-645-2600 or [email protected] . You can also visit the Open & Affordable Textbook Initiative website for more information about open education initiatives at FSU.
Maintained by scott plous , wesleyan university.
For more than 50 years, Robert Rosenthal has conducted research on the role of self-fulfilling prophecies in everyday life and in laboratory situations. Special interests include the effects of teacher's expectations on students' academic and physical performance, the effects of experimenters' expectations on the results of their research, and the effects of clinicians' expectations on their patients' mental and physical health. During this time he has also been studying the role of nonverbal communication in (a) the mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects and in (b) the relationship between members of small groups. In addition, he has explored sources of artifact in behavioral research and in various quantitative procedures. In the realm of data analysis, his special interests are in experimental design and analysis, contrast analysis, and meta-analysis. His most recent books and articles are about these areas of data analysis and about the nature of nonverbal communication in teacher-student, doctor-patient, manager-employee, judge-jury, and psychotherapist-client interaction. Professor Rosenthal is the recipient of several national awards, including election to Fellow status in the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2009), the Gold Medal Award for Life Achievement in the Science of Psychology of the American Psychological Foundation (2003), Distinguished Scientific Award for Applications of Psychology (APA, 2002), Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award (APA Division 5, 2002), James McKeen Cattell Award (APS, 2001), Distinguished Scientist Award (SESP 1996), AAAS Prize for Behavioral Science Research (1993, with Nalini Ambady), Donald Campbell Award (SPSP, 1988), and AAAS Socio-Psychological Prize (1960, with Kermit Fode). He has also been a Guggenheim Fellow, Senior Fulbright Scholar, and a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. Professor Rosenthal served as Co-Chair of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Statistical Inference.
Note from the Network : This SPN member has certified having all necessary rights, licenses, and authorization to post the files listed below. Visitors are welcome to copy or use any files for noncommercial or journalistic purposes provided they credit the member and cite this page as the source.
Note from the Network : The holder of this profile has certified having all necessary rights, licenses, and authorization to post the files listed below. Visitors are welcome to copy or use any files for noncommercial or journalistic purposes provided they credit the profile holder and cite this page as the source.
The Pygmalion Effect and the Power of Positive Expectations
Select video to watch
Length: 5:52
The Pygmalion Effect and Learning, Featuring Robert Rosenthal
Length: 17:0
Master's Series on Field Research: Interview
Length: 53:35
Robert Rosenthal Department of Psychology University of California Psychology Building Riverside, California 92521 United States of America
Note: You will be emailed a copy of your message.
Last edited by user: December 21, 2009 Visits since July 19, 2005: 96,501
From around the world.
Robert Rosenthal: Photo 1
Rosenthal2.jpg (2.74MB)
http://file-id.org/120718/374
July 18, 2012 (3:42 pm EST)
Robert Rosenthal: Photo 2
Rosenthal.jpg (711.47KB)
http://file-id.org/120718/373
The Marylu Clayton Rosenthal Dance Studio
Rosenthal3.jpg (3.67MB)
http://file-id.org/120718/375
Robert Rosenthal in the UC Riverside dance studio named after his late wife, MaryLu Clayton Rosenthal. Source: http://ucrtoday.ucr.edu/910/2751_1hi
Looking at a Plaque in Honor of Marylu
Rosenthal4.jpg (3.83MB)
http://file-id.org/120718/376
Robert Rosenthal in 2011 looking at a plaque honoring MaryLu Clayton Rosenthal. Source: http://newsroom.ucr.edu/2751
The limits of self-fulfilling prophecies.
Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
self-fulfilling prophecy , process through which an originally false expectation leads to its own confirmation. In a self-fulfilling prophecy an individual’s expectations about another person or entity eventually result in the other person or entity acting in ways that confirm the expectations.
A classic example of a self-fulfilling prophecy is the bank failures during the Great Depression . Even banks on strong financial footing sometimes were driven to insolvency by bank runs. Often, if a false rumor started that the bank was insolvent (incapable of covering its deposits), a panic ensued, and depositors wanted to withdraw their money all at once before the bank’s cash ran out. When the bank could not cover all the withdrawals, it actually did become insolvent. Thus, an originally false belief led to its own fulfillment.
Self-fulfilling prophecies are important to the understanding of intergroup relations. Under just the right (or wrong) conditions, inaccurate social stereotypes may lead to their own fulfillment. For example, members of groups stereotyped as more intelligent, competent, or likable can, through the operation of self-fulfilling prophecies, actually become more intelligent, competent, or likable than members of groups stereotyped as less intelligent, competent, or likable. Thus, self-fulfilling prophecies may contribute to the maintenance not only of stereotypes themselves but of the group differences and inequalities that give rise to those stereotypes. Such processes, however, are limited, and the extent to which they contribute to group differences and inequalities is the subject of considerable controversy.
The earliest empirical research on self-fulfilling prophecies examined whether teachers’ false expectations for their students caused students to achieve at levels consistent with those teachers’ expectations. Repeatedly, although not always, research demonstrated that teachers’ expectations are indeed self-fulfilling, as students sometimes come to perform at levels consistent with their teachers’ originally false expectations.
This research has been interpreted by many scholars as providing a powerful insight into social, educational, and economic inequality . Teachers’ expectations seem to systematically advantage students from already advantaged backgrounds and disadvantage students from already disadvantaged backgrounds. To the extent that education is a major stepping-stone toward occupational and economic advancement, self-fulfilling prophecies, it would seem, constitute a major social force operating to prevent the disadvantaged from improving their lot.
Classic studies also showed that both physical attractiveness and racial stereotypes could be self-fulfilling. When men interviewed a woman whom they falsely believed was conventionally physically attractive (accomplished through the use of false photographs in nonface-to-face interviews), not only were the men warmer and friendlier to her, but she became warmer and friendlier in response. Moreover, when white interviewers treated white interviewees in the same cold and distant manner they used with African American interviewees, the performance of the white interviewees suffered.
Self-fulfilling prophecies have been demonstrated in a wide variety of educational, occupational, professional, and informal contexts . They have been demonstrated in experimental laboratory studies, experimental field studies, and naturalistic studies. Indeed, it is fairly easy to string together a few of the classic studies to tell a compelling story about how teachers’ expectations, employers’ expectations, and expectations in everyday interactions victimize people from stigmatized social groups. The logic here is quite simple. Stereotypes are widely shared and inaccurate. Stereotypes lead to inaccurate expectations. These expectations, in turn, are self-fulfilling. According to this perspective, self-fulfilling prophecies constitute a major source of social inequalities and social problems.
For several reasons, however, evidence for the power of self-fulfilling prophecies is far from conclusive. First, some of the classic studies had major methodological problems. Second, many have proven difficult to replicate. Third, the overall power of self-fulfilling prophecies, especially as obtained in naturalistic studies that do not involve experimenters intentionally creating false expectations in participants, is not large at all. Fourth, there currently is about as much evidence that positive self-fulfilling prophecies improve the performance of low-achieving students as there is that negative self-fulfilling prophecies harm their performance. Fifth, considerable evidence indicates that people are not rudderless ships, relentlessly tossed around on the seas of other people’s expectations. Instead, people have their own motivations and goals that enable them to successfully combat others’ false expectations.
Overall, therefore, the evidence does not justify a simple picture of self-fulfilling prophecies as powerful and pervasive sources of social problems. But the picture gets even fuzzier when other research is added to the mix. Although not all stereotypes are 100 percent accurate, it can be argued that most of the empirical studies that have assessed people’s beliefs about groups and then compared those beliefs with criteria regarding what those groups are actually like (census reports, results from hundreds of empirical studies, self-reports) find that people’s beliefs correspond to groups’ characteristics quite well. Indeed, the accuracy of many of the people’s stereotypes (the extent to which people’s beliefs about groups correspond to what those groups are actually like) is one of the largest relationships in all of social psychology .
In addition, the shared component of stereotypes is typically even more accurate than is the individual or idiosyncratic component. Arguably, people do not rigidly and powerfully apply their stereotypes when judging individuals. They often readily jettison their stereotypes when clear and relevant personal information is available about the person being judged, and overall the effect of stereotypes on judging individuals is generally quite small. Thus, some of the key assumptions underlying the “self-fulfilling stereotypes are a powerful and pervasive source of social problems” story, that stereotypes are widely shared and inaccurate and that they powerfully distort expectations for individuals, seem to be largely invalid.
A second important assumption underlying the argument for the power of self-fulfilling prophecies is that even if these prophecies are small in any given study, those small effects, because they likely accumulate over time, can become quite large and hence at least partially account for major social inequalities. For example, if teachers’ expectations increased the IQ of high-expectancy students only 3 points per year and decreased the IQ of low-expectancy students only 3 points per year and if these effects accumulated, then at the end of six years there would be a 36-IQ-point difference between two students who started out with identical IQ test scores but different expectancies.
However, empirical research on self-fulfilling prophecies in education has not provided any evidence of accumulation. Rather than accumulating to become larger and larger over time, the effects of self-fulfilling prophecies in the classroom dissipate over time, as they become smaller and smaller. Given the evidence for generally high accuracy in teachers’ expectations, strongly erroneous teachers’ expectations may be the exception rather than the rule. Thus, students may be highly unlikely to be the target of the same type of erroneous expectation year after year, thereby limiting the likelihood that they will be subjected to the same erroneous expectation (and its self-fulfilling effects) year after year.
Nonetheless, the story about the role of self-fulfilling prophecies in social problems should not be completely discarded. Self-fulfilling prophecies probably do play a real yet relatively modest role in creating or maintaining social inequalities based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity , social class , gender, and attractiveness. Moreover, in some contexts this role can be quite large. Some of the largest self-fulfilling prophecy effects ever obtained were found among students from stigmatized social and demographic groups (African American students, lower social class students, and students with histories of low achievement). Additionally, even though educational self-fulfilling prophecies do not accumulate, they can be very long-lasting. Finally, the types of diagnostic labels often used in educational contexts—learning disabled, emotionally disturbed, neurologically impaired—are inaccurately applied sufficiently often that they may frequently create inaccurately low expectations that are indeed self-fulfilling.
Introduction.
About related articles close popup.
Lorem Ipsum Sit Dolor Amet
Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Aliquam ligula odio, euismod ut aliquam et, vestibulum nec risus. Nulla viverra, arcu et iaculis consequat, justo diam ornare tellus, semper ultrices tellus nunc eu tellus.
Forthcoming articles expand or collapse the "forthcoming articles" section.
Robert Rosenthal defined the Pygmalion effect as “the phenomenon whereby one person’s expectation for another person’s behavior comes to serve as a self-fulfilling prophecy” ( American Psychologist 58.3 [November 2003], p. 839). The Pygmalion phenomenon characterizes many leader-follower relationships. The “leader” can be a manager or supervisor, a military commander, an athletic coach, or an instructor. When leaders’ expectations of their followers’ are raised, they behave in ways that cause their followers, be they employees, soldiers, athletes, or trainees, to perform better. Pygmalion effects have been produced in schools, work organizations, armies, courtrooms, summer camps, and nursing homes, as well as in the practice of clinical psychologists and consultants. Robert Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson’s work Pygmalion in the Classroom ( Rosenthal and Jacobson 1968 , cited under Pygmalion in the Classroom ) first demonstrated the Pygmalion effect experimentally in elementary school classrooms. Meta-analyses consistently confirm the classroom Pygmalion effect. Similarly, there is cumulative field-experimental support for the Pygmalion approach among adults in organizations and work settings, including factories, service organizations, banks, and military units. The Pygmalion effect is an interpersonal motivational phenomenon that begins with high leader expectations. Conveyed to followers orally or nonverbally via leader behavior, the leader’s high expectations augment the followers’ self-expectations and self-efficacy (i.e., their belief in their ability to perform better), boosting motivation and effort, and culminating in enhanced performance. Often, this improved performance reinforces the leader’s high expectations, thus extending an interpersonal exchange to an upward spiral of high expectations sparking high performance and justifying continued high expectations that produce still higher performance. In this way, self-fulfilling prophecy (SFP) can become self-sustaining prophecy. However, SFP is a double-edge sword, in that it can be negative. Contrasted with the Pygmalion effect is the negative Golem effect, in which lowering manager expectations impairs subordinate performance—expect dumbbells and you will get dumbbells. Another type of SFP is the Galatea effect, in which the individual’s own high self-expectations become self-fulfilling. The appeal of the Pygmalion approach for management is rooted in its ability to boost performance based on a cost-free investment of managerial mindfulness and communication of high expectations. This implies a two-fold practical agenda: to raise productivity, managers must both implant high expectations and counteract any manifestations of contrary expectations. The essence of the Pygmalion effect is that managers get the workers they expect. Those who expect more, get more. The converse is true, too: those who expect less, get less. All managers can play a Pygmalion role by cultivating in themselves high expectations regarding their subordinates and by fostering in their subordinates high self-efficacy and high self-expectations. High expectations are too important to be left to chance; they should be built into manager-worker relationships and should be part of all managerial leadership training and development.
The notion of self-fulfilling prophecy was born in sociology. Attempting to understand how society influences individuals, W. I. Thomas originated the notion of situations’ affecting individuals if individuals perceive those situations and respond to their own perceptions. This gave birth to Robert K. Merton’s concept of the self-fulfilling prophecy, which in turn inspired Robert Rosenthal’s theory and experimental work on the Pygmalion effect.
back to top
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login .
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here .
Powered by:
In Chinese culture those who are born in the year of the Dragon under the zodiac calendar are believed to be destined for good fortune and greatness, and parents prefer their kids to be born in a Dragon year. Using provincial level panel data, we first show that the number of marriages goes up during the two years preceding a Dragon year and that births jump up in a Dragon year. Using three recently collected micro data sets from China we show that those born in a Dragon year are more likely to have a college education, and that they obtain higher scores at the university entrance exam. Similarly, Chinese middle school students have higher test scores if they are born in a Dragon year. We show that these results are not because of family background, student self-esteem or students’ expectations about their future. We find, however, that the “Dragon” effect on test scores is eliminated when we account for parents’ expectations about their children’s educational and professional success. We find that parents of Dragon children have higher expectations for their children in comparison to other parents, and that they invest more heavily in their children in terms of time and money. We also show that girls are about six cm shorter than boys, but that this height disadvantage is cut by about half if a girl is born in the year of the Dragon and that effect is twice as strong in rural areas. Given that childhood nutrition is related to adolescent height, this suggests that parents may also be investing in Dragon girls in terms of nutrition. The results are insensitive to model specification and estimation strategy, including using an RD design. These results show that even though neither the Dragon children nor their families are inherently different from other children and families, the belief in the prophecy of success and the ensuing investment become self-fulfilling.
We thank Paola Giuliano, Nathan Nunn, Leyla Mocan, Hanming Fang, Uta Schoenberg, Jeanet Bentzen, Anastasia Litina and Andreas Irmen for helpful suggestions. Seminar participants of the Study of the Religion, Economics and Culture Workshop at Chapman University, Southern Economic Association Conference in Washington D.C., and the 2018 ASREC Europe Conference in Luxembourg City provided useful comments. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
MARC RIS BibTeΧ
Download Citation Data
Naci Mocan & Han Yu, 2020. " Can Superstition Create a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy? School Outcomes of Dragon Children in China, " Journal of Human Capital, vol 14(4), pages 485-534.
More from nber.
In addition to working papers , the NBER disseminates affiliates’ latest findings through a range of free periodicals — the NBER Reporter , the NBER Digest , the Bulletin on Retirement and Disability , the Bulletin on Health , and the Bulletin on Entrepreneurship — as well as online conference reports , video lectures , and interviews .
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
A self-fulfilling prophecy is a prediction that directly or indirectly causes itself to become true. ... conducted an experiment to see whether student achievement could be self-fulfilling based on the expectations of their teachers. Rosenthal and Jacobsen gave elementary school children an IQ test and then informed their teachers which ...
Pygmalion Effect Experiment. Robert Rosenthal subscribed to the hypothesis that expectations can engender self-fulfilling prophecies by inducing corresponding performance. He chose an elementary school in California for his study, and administered an IQ examination to each student (Rosenthal & Jacobson, 1968).
Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968), with their experiment "Pygmalion in the Classroom", were the first to provide evidence of a self-fulfilling prophecy (Merton, 1948) in the context of school. The experiment was controversial, with several scholars questioning different aspects of its results (Pellegrini & Hicks, 1972; Snow, 1969; Thorndike, 1968).
Jane Elliott's Blue Eyes Brown Eyes experiment is one of the most famous experiments in social psychology - and it took place in a classroom! ... If you have ever heard of the self-fulfilling prophecy, these results may not come as a ... the participants weren't a bunch of elementary school children - they were young adults. From the moment the ...
A classic study which supports the self fulfilling prophecy theory was Rosenthal and Jacobson's (1968) study of an elementary school in California. They selected a random sample of 20% of the student population and informed teachers that these students could be expected to achieve rapid intellectual development.
This effect, known as the Pygmalion Effect, is an example of a self-fulfilling prophecy involving interpersonal processes. As Rosenthal put it: "When we expect certain behaviors of others, we are likely to act in ways that make the expected behavior more likely to occur.". Rosenthal & Babad, 1985. Video.
The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy in a Classic Experiment In a classic experiment done in the 1960s, researchers chose two groups of students at random at an elementary school. They told the teachers that they identified the first group of students as "growth-spurters" who have a high potential for intellectual growth and the second group as the ...
In psychology, the Pygmalion effect, as proposed by Robert Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson (1968), applies the ideas of Merton's self-fulfilling prophecy (2) to education (1). Rosenthal and Jacobson's landmark Oak School experiment (1968) examined the influence of teacher's expectations on student performance. A student who is expected to ...
Brophy, J. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 631-661. Google Scholar. ... A synthesis of findings from 18 experiments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 85-97. Google Scholar. ... Applications of Self-Fulfilling Prophecies to School Education.
illustrated the self-fulfilling prophecy through an experiment in which elementary school teachers treated students differently based on their initial positive expectations of those students, and over the course of the school year, students performed in ways that were consistent with teachers' positive expectations. Subsequent research ...
The purpose of the present study was to understand the role of self-fulfilling prophecies in the field of education. Self-fulfilling prophecies are an integral aspect of teacher-student interactions. The participants for the study included ten teachers and ten students from grades 8 to 10. Data was collected using semi-structured, in-depth ...
Self-Fulfilling Prophecies. ... In the students' experiments, the "bright" rats made their way through mazes more quickly. ... In 1964, Rosenthal performed a similar experiment at an elementary school, with teachers and students instead of rats. He selected some students at random, and told teachers that, based on the results of a new IQ ...
Few ideas have influenced educational research and practice as much as the notion of the self-fulfilling prophecy. Yet despite the impact of the "educational self-fulfilling prophecy," the empirical status of the construct, as applied to the effect of teacher expectations on student IQ, remains equivocal.Lack of evidence was apparent even in the now-classic "Pygmalion Study" (Rosenthal ...
the self-fulfilling prophecy has wielded greatest influence--and doubtless stirred the most controversy-in education. In its original form, the self-fulfilling prophecy scarcely seemed controversial. The notion that a false but widely-believed prediction could become true simply because enough people believed in it was neither new nor original.
2. A case study of the "Pygmalion effect": teachers' positive expectations and students' low achievement. There is a consensus in that the Pygmalion effect involves both positive expectations and negative expectations. In the light of a self-fulfilling prophecy, the Pygmalion effect means "you get what you expected". If teachers hold.
The Pygmalion effect is a psychological phenomenon in which high expectations lead to improved performance in a given area and low expectations lead to worse performance. [1] It is named after the Greek myth of Pygmalion, the sculptor who fell so much in love with the perfectly beautiful statue he created that the statue came to life.The psychologists Robert Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson ...
Ph.D. in Psychology from University of California, Los Angeles, 1956. For more than 50 years, Robert Rosenthal has conducted research on the role of self-fulfilling prophecies in everyday life and in laboratory situations. Special interests include the effects of teacher's expectations on students' academic and physical performance, the effects ...
without (self-fulfilling) influence. This definition may differ from teachers' subjective experience of "accu-racy." Consider a teacher who successfully predicted a student's performance. Even if that successful predic-tion derived entirely from a self-fulfilling prophecy, subjectively, the teacher might experience this as "ac-curacy."
self-fulfilling prophecy, process through which an originally false expectation leads to its own confirmation. In a self-fulfilling prophecy an individual's expectations about another person or entity eventually result in the other person or entity acting in ways that confirm the expectations. A classic example of a self-fulfilling prophecy ...
A self-fulfilling prophecy is a prediction that comes true at least in part as a result of a person's belief or expectation that the prediction would come true. [1] In the phenomena, people tend to act the way they have been expected to in order to make the expectations come true. [2] Self-fulfilling prophecies are an example of the more general phenomenon of positive feedback loops.
In this way, self-fulfilling prophecy (SFP) can become self-sustaining prophecy. However, SFP is a double-edge sword, in that it can be negative. Contrasted with the Pygmalion effect is the negative Golem effect, in which lowering manager expectations impairs subordinate performance—expect dumbbells and you will get dumbbells.
The results are insensitive to model specification and estimation strategy, including using an RD design. These results show that even though neither the Dragon children nor their families are inherently different from other children and families, the belief in the prophecy of success and the ensuing investment become self-fulfilling.
In a new paper, Donald Burke looks back at the 1977 Russian flu H1N1 pandemic and its origins, seeing it as an eerie specter that humans are capable of repeating.